Hspa systems 002
-
Upload
santosh-sajjan -
Category
Business
-
view
1.364 -
download
7
Transcript of Hspa systems 002
2 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Disclaimer
Effort has been put to make these slides as correct as possible, however it is still suggested that reader confirms the latest information from official sources like 3GPP specs (http://www.3gpp.org/Specification-Numbering)
Material represents the views and opinions of the author and not necessarily the views of their employers
Use/reproduction of this material is forbidden without a permission from the author
3 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Readings related to the subject
General readings WCDMA for UMTS – H. Holma, A. Toskala HSDPA/HSUPA for UMTS – H. Holma, A. Toskala 3G Evolution - HSPA and LTE for Mobile Broadband - E.
Dahlman, S. Parkvall, J. Sköld and P. Beming, Network planning oriented
Radio Network Planning and Optimisation for UMTS – J. Laiho, A. Wacker, T. Novosad
UMTS Radio Network Planning, Optimization and QoS Management For Practical Engineering Tasks – J. Lempiäinen, M. Manninen
4 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Contents
Introduction HSDPA HSUPA Continuous Packet Connectivity I-HSPA Conclusions
5 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd5 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Introduction
6 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
High Speed Packet Access (1/3)
There were number of pushing forces to improve the packet data capabilities of WCDMA even further, e.g. Growing interest towards rich calls, mobile-TV and music streaming in
the wireless domain Competitive technologies such as WIMAX
High Speed Packet Access (HSPA) evolution introduced first downlink counterpart of the evolution called High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) in Release 5
Uplink evolution followed later in Release 6 by the name of High Speed Uplink Packet Access (HSUPA)
HSPA was originally designed for non-real time traffic with high transmission rate requirements
7 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
High Speed Packet Access (2/3)
HSPA features/properties include e.g. Higher order modulation and coding
Higher throughput and peak data rates In theory up to 5,8 Mbps in the uplink and 14 Mbps in the downlink
without Multiple Inputs and Multiple Outputs (MIMO) Multiple Inputs and Multiple Outputs (MIMO)
Roughly speaking equals to additional transmitter and receiver antennas
Fast scheduling in the Node B Possibility to take advantage of channel conditions with lower latency
8 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
High Speed Packet Access (3/3)
Link adaptation in downlink Possibility to adjust the used modulation and coding scheme according
to be appropriate for current radio channel conditions Improved retransmission capabilities
Newly introduced layer one retransmissions called as Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request (HARQ) => reduced delay
Radio Link Control (RLC) level retransmissions still possible Shorter frame sizes and thus Transmission Time Intervals (TTI)
With HSDPA 2ms and with HSUPA 10ms and 2ms
9 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
WCDMA Background and Evolution
2000 2002 2004 2006 2007200520032001
3GPP Rel -9912/99
3GPP Rel 403/01
3GPP Rel 5 (HSDPA)
03/02
3GPP Rel 6(HSUPA)
2H/04
3GPP Rel 7HSPA+06/07
Further Releases, (LTE)
JapanEurope
(pre-commercial)
Europe(commercial)
HSDPA (commercial)
HSUPA (commercial)
10 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Questions
Why were the packet data capabilities of WCDMA improved even further?
For what kind of services was HSPA originally designed?
11 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd11 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
High Speed Downlink Packet Access(HSDPA)
12 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Introduction to HSDPA (1/2)
In Release 99 there basically exists three different methods for downlink packet data operation DCH, Forward Access Channel (FACH) and Downlink Shared Channel (DSCH)
After the introduction of HSDPA in Release 5 some changes to downlink packet data operations occurred New High Speed DSCH (HS-DSCH) channel was introduced DSCH was removed due to lack of interest for implementing it
in practical networks
13 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Introduction to HSDPA (2/2)
HSDPA Improvements for packet data performance both in terms of capacity and practical bit rates are based on The use of link adaptation, Higher order modulation, Fast scheduling, Shorter frame size (or transmission time interval), and Physical layer retransmission
HSDPA does not support DCH features like fast power control or soft handover
14 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
HSDPA channels (1/2)
The Release 99 based DCH is the key part of the system – despite the introduction of HSDPA Release 5 HSDPA is always operated with the DCH
DCH with HSDPA If the service is only for packet data, then at least the signaling
radio bearer (SRB) is carried on the DCH In case the service is circuit-switched then the service always
runs on the DCH With Release 6, signaling can also be carried without the DCH In Release 5, uplink user data always go on the DCH (when
HSDPA is active)
15 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
HSDPA channels (2/2)
in Release 6 an alternative is provided by the Enhanced DCH (E-DCH) with the introduction of high-speed uplink packet access (HSUPA)
User data is sent on High Speed Downlink Shared Channel (HS-DSCH)
Control information is sent on High Speed Common Control Channel (HS-SCCH)
HS-SCCH is sent two slot before HS-DSCH to inform the scheduled UE of the transport format of the incoming transmission on HS-DSCH
16 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Questions
Mention at least purpose to which Rel’99 DCH is used with HSDPA
What kind of handovers are supported with HSDPA?
17 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Link Adaptation (1/3)
UE informs the Node B regularly of its channel quality by CQI messages (Channel Quality Indicator)
18 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Link Adaptation (2/3)
Adaptive modulation and higher order modulation (16/64QAM) with HSDPA
0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0 1 00 1 20 1 40 1 60- 202468
10121416
Time [number of TTIs]
QPSK1/4
QPSK2/4
QPSK3/4
16QAM 2/4
16QAM 3/4
Inst
anta
neou
s Es
No
[dB]
Link adaptation adjusts the
mode within few ms based
on CQI
19 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Link Adaptation (3/3)
More complex modulation schemes require more energy per bit to be transmitted than simply going for transmission with multiple parallel code channels, thus HSUPA benefits more from using multiple codes as PC keeps the signal levels quite good anyway
20 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Fast Retransmissions (1/3)
Radio Link Control (RLC) layer ACK/NACKs also possible with HSPA
Packet
RLC ACK/NACK
Retransmisson Packet
Layer 1 ACK/NACK
Retransmisson
Rel ‘99 HSPA
RNC
NodeB
UE
21 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Fast Retransmissions (2/3)
RNCNodeBUE
User data
RLC
MAC-d
Layer1
MAC-hs
HARQ (N)ACK
(Re)transmission
RLC (N)ACK
(Re)transmission
22 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Fast Retransmissions (3/3)
Layer 1 signaling indicates the need of retransmission which leads to much faster round trip time that with Rel ‘99
Retransmission procedure with layer 1 retransmissions (HARQ) is done so that decoder does not get rid of the received symbols if the transmission fails but combines them with new transmissions
Retransmissions can operate in two ways: Identical retransmissions (soft/chase combining) Non-identical retransmissions (incremental redundancy)
23 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Questions
What is CQI? What does link adaptation do? Which entity initiates RLC re-transmissions? Which entity initiates HARQ re-transmissions?
24 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Downlink scheduling (1/5)
NodeB has certain amount of users connected to it and it needs to schedule the different users for transmission in different fractions of time (Transmission Time Intervals) Certain fairness for scheduling time for each user should be
maintained Resources should be utilized in optimal manor
There exists different ways that users can be scheduled in downlink, e.g. Round Robin Proportional Fair
25 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Downlink scheduling (2/5)
Round Robin (RR) Simplest scheduling algorithms Assigns users in order i.e. handling all users without priority Positive sides
Easy to implement Each user gets served equally
Negative sides No channel conditions are taken into account and thus resources
might be wasted
26 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Downlink scheduling (3/5)
Proportional Fair (PF) Compromise-based scheduling algorithm Based upon maintaining a balance between two competing
interests Maximize network throughput i.e. users are served in good channel
conditions Allowing all users at least a minimal level of service
27 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Downlink scheduling (4/5)
PF assigning each users a scheduling priority that is inversely proportional to its anticipated resource consumption
High resource consumption => low priority
28 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Downlink scheduling (5/5)
In general priority metric for certain user can be defined as follows
,r
dpriority
where instantaneous data rate, d, is obtained by consulting the link adaptation algorithm and average throughput, r, of the user is defined and/or updated as follows
,otherwise ,*)1(
served isuser if ,**)1(
old
old
ra
darar
where is so called forgetting factor. Hence, equals the equivalent averaging period in a number of TTIs for the exponential smoothing filter
a 1a
29 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Mobility with HSDPA (1/4)
Handovers are roughly tradeoff between two issues When channel conditions are getting worse, handover to better
cell should be made so that packets won’t get lost due to poor channel conditions
However, each time when the handover is made, transmission buffers in the Node B are flushed resulting to additional delays from RLC level retransmission or disruption of service
When regarding HSDPA, the user can be connected only to one serving HSDPA Node B at the time Leading to hard handover when the handover between HSDPA
Node Bs is required in contrary to DCH soft handover
30 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Mobility with HSDPA (2/4)
Even though there is only one serving HS-DSCH cell, the associated DCH itself can be in soft(er) handover and maintain the active set as in Rel’99
DCH
Node B,Serving HSDPA
UE
Node B,Part of DCH active set
HS-SCCH
DCH/HSDPA
DCH
DCH
31 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Mobility with HSDPA (3/4)
HSDPA handover procedure includes following steps Serving HS-DSCH cell change procedure is initiated when a link
in (DCH) active set becomes higher in strength and stays stronger for certain period of time, referred as time-to-trigger
If the condition mentioned above is met then the measurement report is sent from the UE to the Node B, which forwards it to the RNC
If e.g. the admission control requirements are met the RNC can then give the consent for the UE to make the handover by sending so called Signaling Radio Bearer (SRB) (re)configuration message
32 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Mobility with HSDPA (4/4)
In the case of intra Node B handover, the HARQ processes (transmissions) and Node B buffers can be maintained and thus there is only minimal interruption in data flow
However, with inter Node B handover i.e. between Node Bs, the Node B packet buffers are flushed including all unfinished HARQ processes which are belonging to the UE that is handed off
33 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Questions
How does Round Robin allocate resources for the users? How intra- and inter-Node B handovers differ from each
other?
34 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd34 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
High Speed Uplink Packet Access(HSUPA)
35 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Introduction to HSUPA (1/2)
Roughly three years later when HSDPA was introduced uplink counterpart of the high speed packet access evolution was introduced in Release 6 In 3GPP original name was not HSUPA but Enhanced Dedicated
Channel (E-DCH) The obvious choices for uplink evolution was to investigate the
techniques used for HSDPA and, if possible, adopt them for the uplink as well
Improvements in HSUPA when compared to Rel’99 Layer 1 Hybrid ARQ (HARQ) i.e. fast retransmissions Node B based scheduling
36 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Introduction to HSUPA (2/2)
Easier multicode transmissions Shorter frame size, 10ms mandatory for all HSUPA capable
devices and 2 ms as optional feature HSUPA is not a standalone feature, but requires many of
the basic features of the WCDMA Rel’99 Cell selection and synchronization, random access, basic power control loop functions, basic mobility procedures (soft handover), etc.
37 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
HSUPA channels (1/4)
New uplink transport channel - Enhanced Dedicated Channel (E-DCH) Supports key HSUPA features such as HARQ, fast scheduling
etc. Unlike HS-DSCH (HSDPA) E-DCH is not a shared channel, but a
dedicated channel (*) Similarly to DCH, E-DCH is also mapped to physical control and
data channels The user data is carried on the enhanced dedicated physical data
channel (E-DPDCH) while new control information is on the E-DPCCH
(*)Dedicated channel means that each UE has its own data path to the Node B that is continuous and independent from the DCHs and E-DCHs of other UEs
38 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
HSUPA channels (2/4)
From the Release 99 DCH, the dedicated physical control channel (DPCCH) is unchanged and the need for the DPDCH depends on possible uplink services mapped to the DCH DPCCH is used e.g. for fast power control
New channels for scheduling control E-DCH absolute grant channel (E-AGCH) - absolute scheduling
value E-DCH relative grant channel (E-RGCH) - relative step up/down
scheduling commands
39 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
HSUPA channels (3/4)
New channel for retransmission control, carries information in the downlink direction on whether a particular base station has received the uplink packet correctly or not E-DCH HARQ indicator channel (E-HICH)
40 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
HSUPA channels (4/4)
NodeB
UEE-RGGH
E-AGCH
E-HICH
DPCCH
E-DPCCH
E-DPDCH
41 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Questions
What new features on top of multicodes and shorter frame sizes do HSUPA offer?
Is DCH part of the HSUPA?
42 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Uplink scheduling (1/5)
With HSDPA all the cell power can be directed to a single user for a short period of time Very high peak data rates achievable for certain UE and all the
others can be left with a zero data rate However, in the next time instant another UE can be served
and so on With HSUPA HSDPA type of scheduling is not possible
HSUPA is a many-to-one scheduling The uplink transmission power resources are divided to
separate devices (UEs) which can be used only for their purposes and not shared as with HSDPA
43 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Uplink scheduling (2/5)
The shared resource of the uplink is the uplink noise rise(*), or the total received power seen in the Node B receiver
Typically, one UE is unable to consume that resource alone completely and it is very beneficial for the scheduler to know at each time instant how much of that resource each UE will consume and to try to maintain the interference level experienced close to the maximum
Thus, HSUPA scheduling could be referred as very fast DCH scheduling
(*)ratio between the total power received from all of the UEs at the base station and the thermal noise
44 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Uplink scheduling (3/5)
Two different scheduling schemes are defined for HSUPA traffic Scheduled transmissions controlled by Node B which might not
guarantee high enough minimum bit rate. In addition each request requires time consuming signaling
Non-scheduled transmissions (NST) controlled by radio network controller (RNC) which defines a minimum data rate at which the UE can transmit without any previous request. This reduces signaling overhead and consequently processing delays
45 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Uplink scheduling (4/5)
Scheduled transmissions The scheduler measures the noise level and decides whether
Additional traffic can be allocated Should some users have smaller data rates
The scheduler also monitors the uplink feedback Transmitted on E-DPCCH in every TTI Referred as happy bits Tells which users could transmit at a higher data rate both from the
buffer status and the transmission power availability point of view
46 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Uplink scheduling (5/5)
Depending on possible user priorities given from the RNC, the scheduler chooses a particular user or users for data rate adjustment
The respective relative or absolute rate commands are then send on the E-RGCH or E-AGCH
UE in soft handover receives only relative hold/down commands from other than serving HSUPA Node B
47 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Questions
What is the shared resource in the uplink if power is in the downlink?
What kind of scheduling possibilities HSUPA offer?
48 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Multicodes with HSUPA (1/2)
Even though Rel’99 DCH supports in theory multicode transmissions in practice only E-DCH can support multicode transmissions and thus higher bitrates In theory DCH can use 6xSF4 leading to 5.4 Mbps E-DCH can in practice support 2xSF2 + 2xSF4 leading to 5.4
Mbps The reason why DCH does not support multicodes is that
the DCH is controlled by RNC and thus DCH is rather slowly controllable
49 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Multicodes with HSUPA (2/2)
If the UE could send with fully utilizing multicodes in some time instant this might not be the case later and UE might end up in power outage and thus wouldn’t be able to use its allocation
With RNC control reallocation of resources is slow => resources wasted
Also, HSUPA with HARQ increases the possibility to operate with higher BLER target which leads to lower power requirement for corresponding data rate
50 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Mobility with HSUPA (1/2)
HSUPA supports the soft(er) handover procedure similar to WCDMA Rel’99
The HARQ operation in HSUPA soft handover situation is done in following manor If any Node B part of the active set sends an ACK, then the
information given to the Medium Access Control (MAC) layer is that an ACK has been received and the MAC layer will consider the transmission successful
51 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Mobility with HSUPA (2/2)
Data
Layer 1 ACK/NACK
RNC
NodeB
UE
NodeB
Layer 1 ACK/NACK
Correctly received packet
Packet reordering
52 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Questions
Why does not DCH support multicodes in practice? If UE is in a two-way soft handover how does the HARQ
operate?
53 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd53 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Continuous Packet Connectivity(CPC)
54 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Continuous Packet Connectivity (1/5)
Continuous Packet Connectivity (CPC) was released in Release 7
Designed to improve the performance of delay critical small bit rate services like VoIP
Eliminates the need for continuous transmission and reception when data is not exchanged. Can be categorized into three feature UL discontinuous transmission DL discontinuous transmission HS-SCCH less for HSDPA VoIP
55 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Continuous Packet Connectivity (2/5)
Benefits Connected inactive HSPA users need less resources and create
less interference => more users can be connected UE power savings => increased talk time (VoIP) UTRAN resources are saved
56 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Continuous Packet Connectivity (3/5)
= DPDCH (DCH) / E-DPDCH (E-DCH)= DPCCH
E-DCH with 2-ms TTI(Rel-6, phase 2, VoIP)
E-DCH with 10-ms TTI(Rel’6, phase 1, VoIP)
R99 DCH with 20-ms TTI(Rel’99, CS voice)
12.2 kbps DCH
32 kbps E-DCH
160 kbps E-DCHPower offset
E-DCH with 2 ms TTIand UL DPCCH gating
(Rel-7, VoIP)
160 kbps E-DCH
PO
57 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Continuous Packet Connectivity (4/5)
DL discontinuous transmission or Discontinuous Reception (DRx) cycles allow an idle UE to power off the radio receiver for a predefined period Period after the UE wakes up again is called as DRx cycle When UE wakes up it listens predefined time for incoming
transmissions and if it successfully decodes a new transmission during that time it starts timer for staying active certain period of time
UE shall monitor PDCCH
On Duration
DRX Cycle
DRX Period
No measurements done or data received
58 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Continuous Packet Connectivity (5/5)
HS-SCCH-less HSDPA operation in downlink Initial transmission of small (VoIP) packets can be sent without
High Speed Secondary Control Channel (HS-SCCH) Eliminates the control channel overhead from small packets
sent over HSDPA Retransmissions are sent with HS-SCCH pointing to the initial
transmission
59 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
VoIP performance with and without CPC In general major performance enhancements visible if circuit switched
voice over WCDMA and VoIP over HSPA Rel 7 is compared With Rel 99 CS voice capacity 60-70 users/cell With Rel 7 VoIP capacity goes beyond 120 users/cell
H. Holma, M. Kuusela, E. Malkamäki, K. Ranta-aho, C. Tao: “VoIP over HSPA with 3GPP Release 7”, PIMRC, 2006.
60 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd60 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Internet HSPA(I-HSPA)
61 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
I-HSPA (1/3)
Internet-HSPA (I-HSPA) aims to provide competitive mobile internet access with much more simpler network architecture than it is in normal WCDMA systems
Deployable with existing WCDMA base stations Utilizes standard 3GPP terminals Simplified architecture brings many benefits such as
Cost-efficient broadband wireless access Improves the delay performance Transmission savings Enables flat rating for the end user Works anywhere (compared to WLAN or WIMAX)
62 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
I-HSPA (2/3)
UE
NodeB /E-NodeB
RNC
SGSN
GGSN
Internet /Intranet
Internet /Intranet
I-HSPA
63 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
I-HSPA (3/3)
Round trip time of 32-Byte packet
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
Today HSDPA HSDPA+HSUPA
Release 99 ~200
ms
HSDPA <100 ms
HSUPA ~50 ms
InternetIu + coreRNCIubNode BAIUE
I-HSDPA+I-HSUPA
I-HSPA ~25 ms
64 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd64 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Conclusions
65 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Conclusions (1/2)
High Speed Packet Access evolution for WCDMA was introduced in Release 5 and 6 for downlink and uplink, respectively
HSPA offers much higher peak data rates, reaching in theory up to 14 Mbps in the downlink and 5,4 Mbps in the uplink, in addition to reduced delays
Key technologies with HSPA are Fast Layer 1 retransmissions i.e. HARQ Node B scheduling Shorter frame size (2ms in DL and 2/10ms UL) Higher order modulation and coding along with link adaptation
in downlink Real support for multicodes in the uplink
66 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
Conclusions (2/2)
HSPA improved also the performance of delay critical low bit rate services like VoIP even though it was not originally designed for it
Continuous Packet Connectivity (CPC) enhancements introduced in Release 7 improved VoIP performance even more
I-HSPA was introduced to provide competitive internet access solution High data rates with low delay Reduced costs => flat rate could be possible
Femtocells were introduced to improve the mobile convergence and performance in small offices or at home, for instance
67 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
HSPA vs DCH (basic WCDMA)
Feature
Variable spreading factor
Fast power control
Adaptive modulation
BTS based scheduling
DCH
Yes
Yes
No
No
HSUPA
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Fast L1 HARQ No Yes
HSDPA
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Multicode transmission Yes(No in practice)
Yes Yes
Soft handover Yes Yes No(associated DCH only)
68 © 2008 Magister Solutions Ltd
5 codes QPSK
# of codesModulation
5 codes 16-QAM
10 codes 16-QAM
15 codes 16-QAM
15 codes 16-QAM
1.8 Mbps
Maxdata rate
3.6 Mbps
7.2 Mbps
10.1 Mbps
14.4 Mbps
2 x SF4 2 ms10 ms
# of codes TTI
2 x SF2 10 ms
2 x SF2 2 ms
2 x SF2 +2 x SF4 2 ms
1.46 Mbps
Maxdata rate
2.0 Mbps
2.9 Mbps
5.76 Mbps
Downlink HSDPA Theoretical up to 14.4 Mbps Initial capability 1.8 – 3.6 Mbps
Uplink HSUPA Theoretical up to 5.76 Mbps Initial capability 1.46 Mbps
HSPA Peak Data Rates