hs lecture 1
-
Upload
hammad-sarwar -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
0
Transcript of hs lecture 1
-
8/7/2019 hs lecture 1
1/11
Hammad Sarwar Page 1
LECTURE 1
Audit and Assurance
AUDIT: (check, examination, assessment, inspection and appraisal)
The general definition of an audit is an evaluation of a person, organization, system,
process, enterprise, project or product.
OBJECTIVE OF EXTERNAL AUDIT:
The objective of external audit of financial statements is to enable the auditor to express
an opinion on whether the financial statements are prepared, in all material respects, in
accordance with an applicable financial reporting framework.
The phrases used to express the auditors opinion are give a true and fair view or
present fairly, in all material respects, which are equivalent terms.
The auditor gives an opinion on whether the financial
statements:
y Have been prepared in accordance with an acceptable
financial reporting framework, e.g. IFRSs; and
y Comply with any specific statutory requirements, e.g.
to keep adequate accounting records.
THE PURPOSE OF ASSURANCE FOR FINANCIAL AND NON-FINANCIAL
INFORMATION:
An assurance engagement as opposed to an audit is one in which the independent
practitioner evaluates or measures a subject matter that is the responsibility of another
party, against suitable criteria and expresses an opinion that provides the intended user
with a level of assurance about the subject matter.
An external audit is a type ofassurance engagement that is carried out by an auditor to give
independent opinion on a set of financial statements.
People will be surprised to
know that in EnglandCCAB comprises of sixaccounting bodies and all
of them can conductaudits.
-
8/7/2019 hs lecture 1
2/11
Hammad Sarwar Page 2
Subject matter could include data, systems, processes or behavior.
An assurance engagement will involve three separate parties;
y Practitioner
y Responsible party
y Users
BENEFITS OF ASSURANCE WORK:
y Enhances credibility of financial information (to a lesser extent for limited
assurance)
y Reduces risk of management bias.
DIFFERENT ASSURANCE ASSIGNMENTS:
y an audit of financial statements
y a review of financial statements
y risk assessment reports
y performance measurement reports
y Fraud investigations
y Internal control reports
THE IMPORTANCE OF INDEPENDENCE IN ASSURANCE:
Assurance reports are written for the benefit of the people reading them. The
readers need to be able to trust that the reports are reliable and correct. If they
sense any links between the auditors and the things being audited, they may not trust
the opinions given.
If there are any links between the auditors and the things being audited, the report
loses credibility and the assurance is undermined.
It is therefore a requirement if the auditors are independent of those they are auditing
June 10, Question 2 (a): Auditors are frequently required to provide assurance
for a range of non-audit engagements.
Required:
List and explain the elements of an assurance engagement. (5 marks)
-
8/7/2019 hs lecture 1
3/11
Hammad Sarwar Page 3
TRUTH AND FAIRNESS:
True = information is
1. Factual and conforms to reality, is not false.
2. Conforms to required standards and laws.3. The accounts have been correctly extracted from accounting records.
Fair= Information is
1. Free from discrimination and bias.
2. Is in compliance with expected standards and rules.
3. The accounts reflect commercial substance.
WHY HAVE ACCOUNTS AUDITED:
Due to the directors most likely differing to the shareholders, the shareholders will need
some protection, and therefore the auditors will independently review that the directors
have acted in the best interests of the shareholders.
TYPES AND LEVELS OF ASSURANCE:
Reasonable assurance
y High level of assurance
y Positive opinion e.g. in our opinion the FS show a T&F view
y Audit is not an absolute guarantee that FS are free from material misstatement.
y Auditors cannot provide a guarantee because of limitations.
Limited assurance
y Moderate level of assurance
y Negative assurance e.g. nothing has come to our attention to suggest that the
FS do not show a T&F view therefore looks reasonable.y Need more evidence to support a higher level of assurance so limited assurance
generally is for cash flow forecasts, budgets etc
-
8/7/2019 hs lecture 1
4/11
Hammad Sarwar Page 4
Past Exam Questions
June 05, Question 5 (c): Briefly explain the difference between positive and
negative assurance, outlining the advantages to the directors of providing
negative assurance on their cash flow forecast. (4 marks)
June 08,Question 5 (d): In the context of the cash flow forecast, define the term
negative assurance and explain how this differs from the assurance provided by
an audit report on statutory financial statements.(4 marks)
TYPES OF AUDIT:
y Financial Audit
y Cost Audit
y Operational Audit
y System Audit
y Management Audit
y Environmental Audit
y Quality Audit
STATUTORY AND NON-STATUTORY AUDIT:
y Statutory audit
y Non-Statutory audits
-
8/7/2019 hs lecture 1
5/11
Hammad Sarwar Page 5
STATUTORY AUDIT COMPARED TO OTHER ASSURANCE ENGAGEMENTS:
Statutory audit Other assurance work
Scope of work governed by the law Scope of work decided by parties
involved
Carry out in accordance with ethics,
ISAs
Carry out in accordance with ethics,
maybe other guidance
Report on T&F, Properly Prepared and
directors report consistent with FS
Reporting depends on scope of work
Report to members Report to party who engaged
SHOULD A COMPANY HAVE AN AUDIT?
Benefits Disadvantages
Independent confirmation to directors
of profits
Cost
Assurance of compliance with
accounting standards
Time consuming
Can make recommendations on
systems
Adds credibility to financial information
-
8/7/2019 hs lecture 1
6/11
Hammad Sarwar Page 6
ADVANTAGES OF NON-STATUTORY AUDIT:
In addition to advantages common to all forms of audit a non-statutory audit can bring
other advantages.
a) For partners.b) For taxation authorities
c) For loan
RESPONSIBILITIES:
y It is not the auditors responsibility to prepare and present the financial
statements.
y This is the responsibility of the directors.
FORMS OF AUDIT:
y Periodic Audit
y Interim Audit
y Continuous Audit
THE AGENCY THEORY:
The agency theory implies the relationships between the various stakeholders in a
company. The Agency relationships occur when one party, the principle, employs
another party, the agent, to perform a task on their behalf.
ACCOUNTABILITY:
Accountability is the quality or state of being accountable, that is, being required or
expected to justify actions and decisions. It suggests an obligation or willingness to
accept responsibility for ones actions.
STEWARDSHIP:
Stewardship another persons property
AGENTS:
Agents are people employed or used to provide a particular service. In the case of a
company, the people being used to provide the service of managing the business also
have the second role of being people in their own trying to maximize their personal
wealth.
-
8/7/2019 hs lecture 1
7/11
Hammad Sarwar Page 7
MATERIALITY:
Materiality is an expression of the relative significance or importance of a particular
matter in the context of the financial statements as a whole.
A
matter is material if its omission or misstatement would reasonably influence thedecisions of an addressee of the auditors report.
Materiality may also be considered in the context of any individual primary statement
within the financial statements or of individual items included in them.
The auditor must be concerned with identifying 'material' errors, omissions and
misstatements. Both the amount (quantity) and nature (quality) of
misstatements need to be considered.
LIMITATIONS OF AUDIT:
y Auditing is not objective. Judgments have to be made
y Not all items in the Financial statements are tested
y Limitations in accounting and control systems
y Audit report has inherent limitations
y Audit report is issued a long time after the balance sheet date
y Audit evidence sometimes indicated what is probable, not certain
TYPES OF ENGAGEMENTS:
Audit engagement:
The auditor provides a high, but not absolute, level of assurance that the information
is audited is free of material misstatement. This is expressed positively in audit report
as reasonable assurance
Review engagement:
The objective of a review engagement is to enable a practitioner to state whether, on
the basis of procedures which do not provide all the evidence that would be required in
an audit, anything that has come to the practitioners attention that causes the
practitioner to believe that the financial statements are not prepared, in all material
respects, in accordance with an applicable financial reporting network.
In a review engagement, therefore the auditor gives negative assurance, reporting that
he is not aware that anything is materially wrong.
-
8/7/2019 hs lecture 1
8/11
Hammad Sarwar Page 8
Characteristics of a review engagement:
A review engagement has all the attributes of any assurance engagement:
y the practitioner who conducts the work
y
the user who commissioned the worky a responsible party
y the subject matter or the subject matter information
y criteria
y sufficient appropriate evidence which needs to be documented
y a report in which opinion is written
Agreed Upon Procedures:
The auditor simply provides a report of the actual findings, so no assurance is
expressed. Users of the report must instead judge for themselves the auditor procedureand finding and draw their own conclusion
International Standard on Related Services (ISR) 4400, Engagements to Perform
Agreed Upon Procedures Regarding Financial Information. Examples of this type of
engagement could include the quantification of an insurance claim, or of the loss
suffered due to a fraud. The specialist area of forensic accounting and auditing could be
viewed as a specific type of agreed upon procedure engagement.
Compilation of work:
Users of the compiled information gain some benefit from the accountants involvement,
but no assurance is expressed in the report.
Guidance to practitioners is given by the IAASB in ISR 4410, Engagements to Compile
Financial Information. Thus the engagement here is to prepare the financial
statements, and not to express any kind of opinion on them.
THE ENGAGEMENT PROCESS USUALLY INVOLVES:
y
A
greeing the terms of the engagement in an engagement lettery Deciding on a methodology for evidence gathering, and evaluation and
measurement to support a conclusion
y Agreeing the type of report to be produced at the end of the engagement
-
8/7/2019 hs lecture 1
9/11
Hammad Sarwar Page 9
EXPECTATION GAP:
There are certain misconceptions about the role of the auditor and this gap between
what the auditors actually do and what people think they do is known as the
expectations gap.
DISCUSS HOW THE EXPECTATION GAP HAS AN IMPACT ON THE AUDITOR:
The expectation gap is the difference between the auditors responsibilities and the
understanding the users have of assurance reports.
1. Users assume that the auditors are responsible for the preparation of
the financial statements, when in fact its the directors.
2. Users assume its the auditor is responsibility for detecting fraud when in fact
the auditors are concerned about detecting material misstatement which
could include fraud.
3. Users assume that the auditors check all work when in fact they test a sample.
4. Users assume that the audit report is stating the Financial Statements are
correct when actually the auditors are stating they are factually materially
correct.
HOW CAN WE NARROW THE EXPECTATIONS GAP:
y Audit report includes details on responsibilities of auditors and directors.
y Audit report explains how the audit is conducted (test basis, reasonable
assurance etc.) Engagement letter.
y Statement of directors responsibilities in the financial statements.
-
8/7/2019 hs lecture 1
10/11
Hammad Sarwar Page 10
COMPARISON OF EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL AUDITING:
External Audit Internal Audit
Appointed By Shareholders Directors
Reporting To Shareholders Directors
What they CheckAnnual Financial
Statements
Risk Management Systems
(anything management
ask them to check!)
Legally Requirement Usually Yes Typically No
Independence They Must BeIdeally, but hard to
achieve
June 09, Question 4 (a): Contrast the role of internal and external auditors.
(8 marks)
Dec 09, Question 4 (a): Explain the difference between the interim audit and
the final audit. (4 marks)
THE EXTERNAL AUDIT TIMELINE:
INTERIM AUDIT:
The detailed audit planning and assessment of internal controls are
often carried out on an interim audit, which can be done without
waiting for the accounting year to end.
On very large audits, more than one interim audit visit may
be necessary.
FINAL AUDIT:
The Draft (unaudited) Financial Statements are now available.
The main focus is substantive testing results of control tests
determine how much substantive testing is required.
-
8/7/2019 hs lecture 1
11/11
Hammad Sarwar Page 11
H.A.2 (9 mins)
(1) When buying a house, it is common for the purchaser to obtain a number of reports to giveassurance that the property is sound and worth the money that is being offered. Describe threesuch reports and explain the assurance that is being sought.
(2) A common example of a limited assurance engagement is when an accountant is engaged toreview a set of accounts. Identify and briefly describe the five elements of a review engagementto give limited assurance on whether a set of financial statements complies with ifrs.
(3) Complete all the boxes in the table below.
Nature of engagement Audit Review
Amount of work done decided by whom
Type of assurance engagement
Level of assurance provided
Type of report provided
(Total = 5 marks)
H.A.3 (5mins)
(1) Does the external auditor report on whether the published financial statements are correct ornot?
(2) You are auditing the financial statements of AB Ltd and discover that a car has beendouble-counted in the fixed assets at the balance sheet date. The car has a net book value of
$5,000, non current assets are stated at $400,000 the profit before tax for the year is $100,000.What should do?
(Total = 3 marks)