HR Final Barriers to Effective Performance Appraisal
-
Upload
smriti-khanna -
Category
Documents
-
view
113 -
download
0
description
Transcript of HR Final Barriers to Effective Performance Appraisal
![Page 1: HR Final Barriers to Effective Performance Appraisal](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081715/545cb977b1af9ff8378b48cc/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
BARRIERS TO EFFECTIVE APPRAISAL
Presented BY :- DEEPAK KUMAR PRAVEEN DUBE
![Page 2: HR Final Barriers to Effective Performance Appraisal](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081715/545cb977b1af9ff8378b48cc/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
WHAT IS A BARRIER ?
• Barrier refers to any obstacle to movement, communication or progress.
• Anything which prevents two or more people or groups from agreeing , communicating or working with each other.
![Page 3: HR Final Barriers to Effective Performance Appraisal](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081715/545cb977b1af9ff8378b48cc/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AT A GLANCE…
A performance appraisal, employee appraisal, performance review, or (career) development discussion is a method by which the job performance of an employee is evaluated (generally in terms of quality, quantity, cost, and time) typically by the corresponding manager or supervisor. A performance appraisal is a part of guiding and managing career development.
![Page 4: HR Final Barriers to Effective Performance Appraisal](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081715/545cb977b1af9ff8378b48cc/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Barriers to Effective Appraisals
• Halo or Horn Effect• Personality Conflict • Central tendency • Leniency or Strictness• Similar to Me Effect • Contrast Effect
![Page 5: HR Final Barriers to Effective Performance Appraisal](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081715/545cb977b1af9ff8378b48cc/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Barriers to Effective Appraisals
• First Impression • Spill Over Effect• Use Of Abstract Words• Unrealistic Standards• Ineffective Communication Channel• Critical Incident Effect
![Page 6: HR Final Barriers to Effective Performance Appraisal](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081715/545cb977b1af9ff8378b48cc/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Barriers to Effective Appraisals
• Forced Distribution• Stereotyping• Incompetence & Lack Of Knowledge• Negative Approach• Resistance
![Page 7: HR Final Barriers to Effective Performance Appraisal](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081715/545cb977b1af9ff8378b48cc/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Halo or Horn Effect
• It was first noted by Edward Thorndike in the 1920s.
• This is an assumption on the part of the supervisor that because the employee was good at one factor, they will be good at all other subsequent factors.
![Page 8: HR Final Barriers to Effective Performance Appraisal](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081715/545cb977b1af9ff8378b48cc/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Personality Conflict
• Disagreements on interpersonal issues are known as Personality Conflict.
• Certain level of conflict is necessary to increase performance.
• Performance declines as the level of conflict increases.
![Page 9: HR Final Barriers to Effective Performance Appraisal](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081715/545cb977b1af9ff8378b48cc/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Central tendency
• Central tendency is when the supervisor tends to see everything as average, such as a 3 on a 5-point scale.
• Subordinates are neither condemned nor
praised according to their performance.
![Page 10: HR Final Barriers to Effective Performance Appraisal](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081715/545cb977b1af9ff8378b48cc/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Leniency or Strictness
• Lenient or easy raters assign consistently high values or scores to their employees.
• Strict or harsh raters give consistently low ratings.
![Page 11: HR Final Barriers to Effective Performance Appraisal](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081715/545cb977b1af9ff8378b48cc/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Leniency Evaluation
A n-item rating scale is used by the subjects to evaluate the employee’s performance. Each scale item corresponds to a different performance dimension and is measured using a 7-point likert scale. Subject ratings of the employee’s performance are converted into leniency measures . Using the ratings’ “true scores” as determined by the subject matter experts, it is possible to quantify the raters’ tendencies to assign higher ratings than the employee’s performance would necessitate.
![Page 12: HR Final Barriers to Effective Performance Appraisal](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081715/545cb977b1af9ff8378b48cc/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Leniency is computed using the following formula:
where d is the number of rating scale items (4); k refers to the kth rater; R is the obtained rating; and T is the “true score”. Negative mean scores indicate that the subject was more lenient in his/her ratings than the true score. Positive scores indicate severity in ratings from the true score.
![Page 13: HR Final Barriers to Effective Performance Appraisal](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081715/545cb977b1af9ff8378b48cc/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Similar to Me Effect
• It refers to a tendency of assessor or evaluator to favor those individuals who are similar to them. Put simply, people are attracted to candidates with similar senses of humor, similar conversational styles, even similar physical appearances.
• This occurs when there are non-job factors in common between the assessor and the employee, such as social or religious similarities and so on.
![Page 14: HR Final Barriers to Effective Performance Appraisal](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081715/545cb977b1af9ff8378b48cc/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Similar to me effect continued….- Tendency to perceive people in a (+) way when
assessor sees them as being similar to himself- those that are dissimilar are evaluated in a (-)way- source of bias- similarities found in age, race, work values, habits,
beliefsWORKER-BOSS relationship: Boss to Worker = more lenientWorker to Boss = more trusting + confident
![Page 15: HR Final Barriers to Effective Performance Appraisal](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081715/545cb977b1af9ff8378b48cc/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Contrast Effect
• This occurs when comparison of the performance of one employee with the performance of another employee is done.
• It results in an unfair judgment of the first employee.
![Page 16: HR Final Barriers to Effective Performance Appraisal](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081715/545cb977b1af9ff8378b48cc/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
First Impression
• When the performance appraisal is made without observation over time. This can be either positive or negative, based on impression that is created.
![Page 17: HR Final Barriers to Effective Performance Appraisal](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081715/545cb977b1af9ff8378b48cc/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Spill Over Effect
• Often some raters evaluate persons on the basis of their performance in the past; average constant behaviour is not checked.
• When the employee is rated on the basis of his recent past performance , it is termed as Recency.
![Page 18: HR Final Barriers to Effective Performance Appraisal](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081715/545cb977b1af9ff8378b48cc/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Use Of Abstract Words
• Too often managers fill their performance reviews with words such as “good”, “excellent” and “outstanding” rather than being specific and explaining how well the employees met their goals.
• Words like “grasps”, “generates” and “achieves” would serve the purpose better.
![Page 19: HR Final Barriers to Effective Performance Appraisal](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081715/545cb977b1af9ff8378b48cc/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Unrealistic Standards
• Standards describe the conditions that must exist before the performance can be rated satisfactory.
• Standards should neither be too high nor too low to ensure the growth of the organization.
![Page 20: HR Final Barriers to Effective Performance Appraisal](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081715/545cb977b1af9ff8378b48cc/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Ineffective Communication Channel
• Due to the ineffectiveness in communication channel the evaluator may not be able to convey the intended message to the employee.
![Page 21: HR Final Barriers to Effective Performance Appraisal](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081715/545cb977b1af9ff8378b48cc/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Critical Incident Effect
It refers to keeping a record of uncommonly good or undesirable examples of an employee's work-related behavior and reviewing the list with the employee at the time of evaluation.
![Page 22: HR Final Barriers to Effective Performance Appraisal](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081715/545cb977b1af9ff8378b48cc/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
forced distribution
• Predetermined percentages of employees are placed in various performance categories.
AverageBelow averageGoodExcellent
Distribution Of Employees
![Page 23: HR Final Barriers to Effective Performance Appraisal](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081715/545cb977b1af9ff8378b48cc/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Stereotyping
• This implies that forming a mental picture of a person on the basis of his age, gender, caste or religion.
• It results in an over-simplified view and blurs the assessment of job performance.
![Page 24: HR Final Barriers to Effective Performance Appraisal](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081715/545cb977b1af9ff8378b48cc/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Incompetence & Lack Of Knowledge
• Raters may fail to evaluate performance accurately due to lack of knowledge and experience.
• Post appraisal interview is often handled ineffectively.
![Page 25: HR Final Barriers to Effective Performance Appraisal](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081715/545cb977b1af9ff8378b48cc/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Negative Approach
• Performance appraisal loses most of its value when the focus of management is on punishment rather than on development of employees.
![Page 26: HR Final Barriers to Effective Performance Appraisal](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081715/545cb977b1af9ff8378b48cc/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Resistance
• Trade unions may resist performance appraisal on the ground that it involves discrimination among its members.
• Negative ratings may affect interpersonal relation particularly when employees or unions do not have faith in the system of performance appraisal.
![Page 27: HR Final Barriers to Effective Performance Appraisal](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081715/545cb977b1af9ff8378b48cc/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
References
• About.com • Adam N. Prowker, Research paper (1999),
Blacksburg, Virginia• Arthur Sherman, George Bohlander ,Scott Snell ;
Managing Human Resource• Rakesh K. Chopra; Management Of Human Resource• George T. Milkovich, John W. Boudreau (Cornell
University); Human Resource Management
![Page 28: HR Final Barriers to Effective Performance Appraisal](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081715/545cb977b1af9ff8378b48cc/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
References
• Dr. C.B. Gupta (Delhi University)Human Resource Management
• Dr. L.M. Prasad ; Principles and Practice Of Management
• Wikipedia.com
![Page 29: HR Final Barriers to Effective Performance Appraisal](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081715/545cb977b1af9ff8378b48cc/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
ANY QUESTIONS???