How Win in 2012

download How Win in 2012

of 26

Transcript of How Win in 2012

  • 8/6/2019 How Win in 2012

    1/26

    How and Why We Can Win:

    Republicans+

    Liberty Activists

  • 8/6/2019 How Win in 2012

    2/26

    .

    67.12%

    32.88%

    National Population = 307,006,550

    Eligible citizens 18yrs+ = 206,072,000

    Ineligible = 100,934,550

    47.66%

    19.47%

    32.88%

    Voters registered and not

    Registered voters = 146,311,000

    Probable Eligible Not Registeredabbrev: PENR = 59,761,000

    Ineligible = 100,934,550Register MORE Republicans

    say 20% of 33% = 3,944,226

  • 8/6/2019 How Win in 2012

    3/26

    36.00%

    33.00%

    31.00%

    Registered Voters 2008 = 146,311,000

    Democrats = 52,671,960

    Republican = 48,282,630

    Unaffiliated or other = 45,356,410

    10.29%

    89.71%

    Registration vs. Votes 2008 = 131,254,328

    Did NOT vote in 2008 = 15,053,672

    Total voted in 2008 = 131,254,328

    Get Out The Vote:Republicans who did not vote =

    15,053,672 * (0.33) = 4,967,712

    If we improve turnout by

    20% = 993,542

    Colorado ratios are similar to national:

    D= 34.26% R = 34.54% U = 30.60%

  • 8/6/2019 How Win in 2012

    4/26

    52.92%45.66%

    1.42% Actual Votes - 2008

    Democrats = 69,456,897

    Republicans = 59,934,814

    Other = 1,865,617

    What the heck happened?

    57%ofUnaffiliated voters cast their ballots

    for the Democrat!

    5.6 million more went D rather than R.

  • 8/6/2019 How Win in 2012

    5/26

    57.03%

    42.97%

    Where the Unaffiliated Votes Went

    Unaffiliated added to Dems = 22,875,881

    Unaffiliated added to Reps = 17,235,549

    BUT WHY?

  • 8/6/2019 How Win in 2012

    6/26

    Has this ever happened before?

    In 1992 Perot promised change, split the

    vote, and thereby handed theWhitehouse

    to a stealthy Progressive . . . . . Bill Clinton

  • 8/6/2019 How Win in 2012

    7/26

    Conventional political thinking pinned

    the blame on not getting enough votesfrom a mythical Centrists group.

    Guess what? Centrists do not exist asa group. Oh they exist here and there

    as individuals but not as a self-identifying

    group. I have known only two peoplewho consistently, consciously split the

    baby on most issues, and . . . . . . .

  • 8/6/2019 How Win in 2012

    8/26

    . . . . both of them voted Democrat 99%

    of the time.

    Instead of mythical Centrists there are

    Unaffiliated (Independent) voters.

    These people do NOT affiliate with

    EITHER party . . . . . . by choice!

    A prudent person would ask Why?

  • 8/6/2019 How Win in 2012

    9/26

    Interviews and surveys consistently show a

    majority of Unaffiliated voters (as well aslarge pluralities of party regulars) feel:

    1. Distrustful of both parties

    2. Betrayed by both parties

    Why?

  • 8/6/2019 How Win in 2012

    10/26

    Because many career politicians have

    proven themselves to be . . . .UNTRUSTWORTHY

    Much of the legislationpassed in the last 80 years addresses

    issues that are clearly not authorized by the Constitution.

    Many members of Congress from both parties have collaborated

    in passing Constitutionally unauthorized legislation in flagrant

    violation of their sworn Oaths, thereby demonstrating they are

    not worthy of the public trust.

    Many politicians, especially career politicians, have frequently said

    orpromised anything to get elected, but once in office have

    repeatedlyreversed themselves (e.g. Oh, that was just a campaign

    pledge. ) again proving they are not trustworthy.

    Legislators engage in deceitful practices including, but not limited to:

    1) earmarks; 2) amendments unrelated to the primary purpose of a

    given bill; 3) closed door negotiations; 4) scheduling late night or

    calendar inconvenient votes; 5) unrecorded votes; 6) hidden favors

    for special interests; 7) excluding members of Congress from the

    effects of legislation. Such practices destroy trust and reinforce

    the public perception that most career politicians consider

    themselves ruling elites, above the law, and possessing

    superior knowledge of what is best for the ignorant masses.

    Many politicians imply that the public should

    automatically acknowledge that theiractions are justified

    because political action is comprised of a series of difficult,

    time consuming negotiations punctuated by compromises,

    all of which demand great patience, stamina, and tact (i.e.

    it is hard work, so shut up!). This is arrogant condescension.

    Most politicians are formerlawyers, are wealthy, orboth.

    Lawyers are the least trustedprofessionals in our society.

    Basic human nature ensures that manypeople envy the

    wealthy and suspect them of being unworthy beneficiaries

    of unfair practices.

  • 8/6/2019 How Win in 2012

    11/26

    Most citizens deeply believe these lines from theDeclaration of Independence: We hold these truths to be

    self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed

    by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these

    are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure

    these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving theirjust powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any

    Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right

    of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government,

    laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in

    such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect

    their Safety and Happiness.

  • 8/6/2019 How Win in 2012

    12/26

    Most citizens also deeply believe there is an inviolable contractbetween the people of the United States of America and the

    federal government clearly spelled out by the Constitution.

    All members of Congress and most officers in the executive and

    judicial branches are required to swear Oaths or Affirmations

    of Office to support and defend the Constitution.

    Hence most citizens FEELBETRAYED (as with a breach of

    contract) by those who undermine the Constitutions integrity

    by passing legislation, by issuing executive orders, or by

    engaging in judicial activism contrary to, or outside of,

    the common-sense, explicit limits defined by the Constitution.

  • 8/6/2019 How Win in 2012

    13/26

    Why do so many reasonably intelligent individualsgo into politics only to wind up abrogating their

    responsibilities and colluding with others to

    literally subvert the Constitution?

    Are there really that many scoundrels?[Well, yes . . . . .but that does not explain everything]

    Is there a better, more comprehensive explanation?[Yes there is . . . . . ]

  • 8/6/2019 How Win in 2012

    14/26

    SYSTEM DRIVES BEHAVIOR

    Lefts list + Rights list + a Constitution[without feedback controls]

    produces an inexorable growth ofLeviathangovernment intruding into every individuals

    life, from the details of work and finances, to

    an endless, irritating series of dictates to impose

    various notions of morality and conscience

    How does it work? . . . . .

  • 8/6/2019 How Win in 2012

    15/26

    Left-wingObsessed with preventing outcomes they

    perceive to be unfair, they want:

    Forced redistribution

    Forced speech/thought conformanceForced union support

    Forced separation from religion

    Forced racial quotas

    Forced social changes (through judicial

    activism &/or frivolous lawsuits)

    Forced acceptance of illegal immigration

    Forced victimhood / disarmamentForced taxpayer funding (for things

    rejected by large pluralities; e.g. abortion ondemand; medical care on demand; unrestricted welfare

    on demand; daycare; legal services; extensive maternity

    and paternity leave; massive foreign aid; humanitarian

    interventionism; onerous regulation of businesses and

    organizations to achieve any of the foregoing)

    Right-wingObsessed with preventing outcomes they

    perceive to be immoral, they want:

    Forced government definition of marriage

    Forced criminalization of abortionForced discrimination against homosexuals

    Forced criminalization of drug use

    Forced taxpayer support of religious institutions

    Forced prayer in schools

    Forced teaching of creationism

    Forced abridgement of civil rights protections

    (e.g. non-warranted wire-tapping, detention withoutaccess to representation or right to trial, and selective

    torture; most of these have been bad ideas from inception

    AND they have been undertaken by unconstitutional means)

    Advocates of using the

    Coercive Power of Government1

  • 8/6/2019 How Win in 2012

    16/26

    System Drives Behavior whenever either the Left-wing or the

    Right-wing, get their way (Oh, its just this one time), then the

    other wing responds to counteract. This ensures the ongoinggrowth and intrusiveness of extra-Constitutional government.

    The rationalizations of either camp followed to their logical

    conclusions inevitably lead to VERY BAD ENDS. On topic aftertopic, relatively few (20% to 30%) FORCE the majority (70% to 80%)

    to comply with their schemes. Eventually the majority begin to

    resent bothparties!

    Advocates of using the

    Coercive Power of Government2

  • 8/6/2019 How Win in 2012

    17/26

    Bigger Government =

    Smaller Individual

    Left-wing Right-wing

    redistribution

    speech/thought conformance

    coerced unionization

    separation from religion

    racial quotas

    radical social changes

    embrace of illegal immigration

    victimhood / disarmament

    coerced taxpayer funding

    criminalization of abortion

    unauthorized definition of marriage

    discrimination against homosexuals

    criminalization of drug use

    taxes to religious institutions

    prayer in schools

    coerced teaching of creationism

    abridgement of civil rights protections

    etc.

  • 8/6/2019 How Win in 2012

    18/26

    The SYSTEM as it currently functionsBETRAYSthe majority and rewards do-nothings and ideologues!

    That is why many on the Left (10%+ ofLiberty Activists), more

    on the Right (30%), and even more Unaffiliated (60%)people

    increasingly fear their government and have become desperate

    to find someone they TRUST . . . . . to behave honorably within

    the terms of our fundamental CONTRACT. In other words,

    someone with the consistent integrity to demand and ensure therestoration of genuine Constitutionally Limited Governance.

  • 8/6/2019 How Win in 2012

    19/26

    TRUST MUSTB

    E EARNED

    ESPECIALLY AMONG

    UNAFFILIATED VOTERS

    How? Actually lets start with How to NOT Earn Trust

  • 8/6/2019 How Win in 2012

    20/26

    HOW TO NOT EARN TRUST:

    PARANOIAGENIC (the opposite of Trust-Inducing)

    CANDIDATE BEHAVIORS:

    1. Tip-toe through the minefields of special interests to try to

    pick the winning lottery number of narrow issues du

    jour in a desperate attempt to avoid alienating anyone

    2. Try to be all things to all special interests, which really means

    becoming a nothing to everybody

    3. Pound the narrow issues and send out negative messages

  • 8/6/2019 How Win in 2012

    21/26

    TRUST-INDUCING

    CANDIDATE BEHAVIORS (basic):

    1. Visionary, uplifting, positive messages

    2. Clearly articulated principles

    3. Genuine, consistent beliefs projected by living them

    4. Commitment to truth-telling, especially when politically risky

    What else? . . . . .

  • 8/6/2019 How Win in 2012

    22/26

    TRUST-INDUCING CANDIDATE BEHAVIOR(higher level

    1

    ):

    Endorse three Federal-level resolutions crafted to produce transformative

    changes to reclaim control and ensure responsible, accountable behavior.

    Finish what the Founders started by implementing common sense methods

    to achieve the clear intent of the Constitution:

    1. Require a Balanced Budget with Explicit Tax and Expenditure Limits

    2. Adhere to Enumerated Powers in all legislative, executive, & judicial acts

    3. Require every Bill/Act to address one, and only one, topic, allow nounrelated amendments, riders, or earmarks, clearly cite Constitutional

    authority, and submit the final form for public review not less than

    seven days prior to vote

  • 8/6/2019 How Win in 2012

    23/26

    TRUST-INDUCING CANDIDATE BEHAVIOR(higher level

    2

    ):

    Endorse the five State-level resolutions crafted to re-assert State sovereignty

    per the 10th Amendment, altogether or separately:

    1. Demand cessation of federal programs, mandates, agencies, and

    obligations that are clearly not authorized by the Constitution.

    2. a) intrastate manufacture and use of firearms not subject to federal control;

    b) no foreign deployment of Colorado National Guard; c) intrastate control

    of drugs by Colorado, not federal entities; d) end federal interference and

    taxation related to mineral, oil and gas resources not under the original

    Constitutional meaning of interstate commerce

    3. a) divest local, county and state asset funds of all US Treasury Bills, Bonds

    and other US financial instruments within 3 years; b) replace with reliable

    assets independently audited, including at least 25% Precious Metals, plus

    (continued on next slide)

  • 8/6/2019 How Win in 2012

    24/26

    TRUST-INDUCING CANDIDATE BEHAVIOR(higher level2):

    Endorse State-level resolutions crafted to re-assert State sovereignty

    perthe 10th Amendment (continued):

    3. (continued) Colorado-based equities and some out-of-state or foreign assets

    and equities per competent asset management; c) establish a Colorado State-owned Bank for all state assets, self-insured and NOT a member of the

    Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)

    4. Implement private Digital Gold Currency (DGC) Exchange and its use within

    3 years by State Treasurer, county, & city financial directors for tax refunds

    5. a) divest city, county and state reserve, pension and PERA asset funds from

    banks and financial institutions; b) replace with reliable assets independently

    audited, including at least 25% Precious Metals, plus Colorado-based equities

    plus out-of-state equities/assets per competent management within 3 years

  • 8/6/2019 How Win in 2012

    25/26

    SUMMARY EARN TRUST BY

    SELECTING CANDIDATES WHO:

    Quit trying to pick the right mix of issues to appeal to enough voters

    Avoid debating all the narrow issues (the Lefts favorite game)

    Boldly tell the truth, even when it might seem risky

    Clearly articulate the visionary and uplifting message of absolute commitment

    to protecting and enhancing Constitutional limits on government(the Left is vulnerable on this --- and they know it)

    Likewise articulate the common-sense necessity of demanding that government

    live within a budget --- just like families --- starting with spending

    reductions instead of tax increases in order to be jobs friendly

  • 8/6/2019 How Win in 2012

    26/26

    We must Earn the TRUST of a

    majority of Unaffiliated votersbecause:

    15.35%

    3.87%

    80.78%

    There are only 3 pla

    ces to get more votes

    Register more: 19,721,130 x 20% target = 3,944,226

    Get Out The Vote: 4,967,712 x 20% target = 993,542

    Attract Unaffiliated: 40,689,772 x 51% target = 20,751,784