How to Become a Researcher

90
HOW TO BECOME A RESEARCHER? Published by CAFET-INNOVA Technical Society Hyderabad, INDIA www.cafetinnova.org

Transcript of How to Become a Researcher

Page 1: How to Become a Researcher

HOW TO BECOME A RESEARCHER?

Published by

CAFET-INNOVA Technical Society Hyderabad, INDIA

www.cafetinnova.org

Page 2: How to Become a Researcher

CAFET-INNOVA Technical Society 1-2-18/103, Mohini Mansion, Gagan Mahal Road, Domalguda Hyderabad – 500 029, Andhra Pradesh, INDIA Website: http://www.cafetinnova.org Mobile: +91-9866587053

Regd: 1575

Registered by Government of Andhra Pradesh under the AP Societies Act. 2001

The chapters published in this book have been peer reviewed by experts and the authors

are solely responsible for content of the chapters published in this book.

Copyright © 2011 CAFET-INNOVA Technical Society

All rights reserved with CAFET-INNOVA Technical Society. No part of this book should be translated or reproduced in any form, Electronic, Mechanical, Photocopy, Recording or any information storage and retrieval system without prior permission in writing, from CAFET-INNOVA Technical Society.

Page 3: How to Become a Researcher

PREFACE

“Imagination is more important than knowledge” – Albert Einstein

“How to become a Researcher?” is an effort to motivate young talent especially

students towards R&D and harness their intellectual capabilities according to the

industrial requirements. Academic institutions produce a large pool of talented

manpower, but few innovations and patented products. This is because of lack of

necessary technical and practical skills, lack of cultural fit and attitudes towards

teamwork. Due to insufficient guidance, even faculties are unaware of latest

happenings and in-turn fail to deliver research aptitude to students.

The aim of this book is to provide necessary information about basics of research

and the actual methodologies applied while doing research. Highlighting the

details of technical writing followed by both academic and commercial research.

Describing the importance of technical events and publications along with

explaining the various preventive steps taken against plagiarism, infringement,

counterfeits, etc. Presentation skills are also included to guide researchers to

market their research ideas.

The book is intended to be accessible to under-graduate and post-graduate

students as well as research scholars and someone who would like to take up

research either full-time / part-time or consider research as a hobby.

Professor D. Venkat Reddy

Department of Civil Engineering, NIT-Karnataka

President, CAFET-INNOVA Technical Society

Editor-in-Chief, International Journal of Earth Sciences & Engineering

Executive Editor, International Journal of Biological Sciences & Engineering

26th

JUNE, 2011

Page 4: How to Become a Researcher

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I take this opportunity with much pleasure to thank all the authors who have

contributed their chapters to suture the content of this book. I sincerely thank

Professor D. Venkat Reddy of NIT-Karnataka for his guidance, help and

motivation. I would like to express my gratitude to Dr. S. D. Sivasubramaniam of

Nottingham Trent University, UK for his review and many helpful suggestions.

My sincere gratitude also goes to Professor K. Laxminarayana (Project Director

Retd. DLRL-Hyderabad) and Dr. V. Balaram (Director Grade Scientist, NGRI) for

their encouragement.

Special thanks go to Suchismita Mallick for her great support in maintaining high

standards of the book with her proof-read, and Pradeep Kumar Das for sharing his

creative ideas that turned into the cover page of this book.

I gratefully acknowledge the support from Professor Suresh Kumar, Dr. Neelima

Satyam, Dinesh Pandian, Mohd Abubakr, Prakash Raju, and Nafeesa Parveen.

Finally, this book “How to become a Researcher?” would not have been possible

without the confidence, endurance and support of P. Nikhil Prakash and Raju. A

Hafeez Basha. R

Editor – “How to become a Researcher”

Page 5: How to Become a Researcher

Contents

1. What it takes to become a researcher?

By Mohd Abubakr

1-12

2. Awareness on Paper-presentation

By Hafeez Basha. R and S. D. Sivasubramaniam

13-24

3. Importance of Technical Programs & Publications

By Raju. A

25-34

4. Journal Publishing – An inside story

By Hafeez Basha. R and D. Venkat Reddy

35-44

5. Research Methodology

By Neelima Satyam

45-52

6. Nuts and Bolts of Intellectual Property

By Dinesh Pandian and P. Nikhil Prakash

53-72

7. Presentation and Interpersonal Skills

By R. Suresh Kumar

73-84

Page 6: How to Become a Researcher
Page 7: How to Become a Researcher

This chapter isn’t about theorems, lemmas or

be precise, this chapter is about phycology of researchers

researchers, their life, the decisions they make

This chapter is meant for

• Students who want to be researchers but don’t know where to start

• Researchers who are finding

decision in life by taking up research

While the primary audience is to-be researchers, however, the content presented in this chapter can be

read and enjoyed by one and all.

1 Research and ResearchersFor some, research is a profession. For some, research is a recreation. For some, research is business.

For some, research is a crime. For some, research is fear. And so on. But for a true researc

is a way of life. The influence of research can be seen in all works of

live their life through research. Even though this might sound like an exaggerated

indeed true. For example, true sportsmen live their life through the sport they play. Take away the sport

from them, their lives would be empty. Remove cricket from Sachin Tendulkar’s life or remove driving

from Michael Schumacher’s life, what would you find in their lives? Similarl

from the life of a true researcher, you won’t find anything.

But how do researchers live life through research? Research isn’t merely about writing research papers

or inventing machines. There is much more to it. The process of writing a research paper doesn’t merely

start from the time researcher holds the pen. A lot goes on behind the scenes.

How to become a Researcher?

1 | P a g e

This chapter isn’t about theorems, lemmas or prepositions. This chapter is a about human phycology. To

about phycology of researchers and their life. We will discuss ab

the decisions they make and how a researchers can make best use of

Students who want to be researchers but don’t know where to start

re finding extremely difficult to determine whether they hav

decision in life by taking up research

be researchers, however, the content presented in this chapter can be

and Researchers For some, research is a profession. For some, research is a recreation. For some, research is business.

For some, research is a crime. For some, research is fear. And so on. But for a true researc

luence of research can be seen in all works of the life of researcher

live their life through research. Even though this might sound like an exaggerated movie dialogue

rue sportsmen live their life through the sport they play. Take away the sport

from them, their lives would be empty. Remove cricket from Sachin Tendulkar’s life or remove driving

from Michael Schumacher’s life, what would you find in their lives? Similarly, if you remove research

from the life of a true researcher, you won’t find anything. Research is the life for a researcher.

But how do researchers live life through research? Research isn’t merely about writing research papers

re is much more to it. The process of writing a research paper doesn’t merely

holds the pen. A lot goes on behind the scenes.

s. This chapter is a about human phycology. To

. We will discuss about

can make best use of their talent.

extremely difficult to determine whether they have made a right

be researchers, however, the content presented in this chapter can be

For some, research is a profession. For some, research is a recreation. For some, research is business.

For some, research is a crime. For some, research is fear. And so on. But for a true researcher, research

of researcher. Researchers

movie dialogue, this is

rue sportsmen live their life through the sport they play. Take away the sport

from them, their lives would be empty. Remove cricket from Sachin Tendulkar’s life or remove driving

y, if you remove research

Research is the life for a researcher.

But how do researchers live life through research? Research isn’t merely about writing research papers

re is much more to it. The process of writing a research paper doesn’t merely

holds the pen. A lot goes on behind the scenes. In order to make

Page 8: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

2 | P a g e

discoveries or inventions, a researcher must have the unquenchable thirst for knowledge, unceasing

passion for discovering the truth and unending zeal to fight against failures. The greatest of ideas occur

only to those who experience highest amount of failure and yet don’t give up.

Some say that the greatest pleasure that a human can experience is immortality. And research gives that

pleasure. Successful research makes the researcher immortal. The names of researchers are echoed

with respect for centuries and millennia by all civilizations. Their names become synonymous with

human excellence and intellectuality. Even after 350 years since his times, the name of Newton is known

to more than 3,000 million people on this planet. It speaks volumes of the fame research gives to a

human being. And this is not the kind of fame that dies down with the decline of power. This is the

immortal kind of fame that would remain forever.

However, research is heart-breaking too. Sometimes the problems don’t crack even after lifetime of

effort and many researchers had lived such lives. In the rapidly changing technological fields, there is

deep-throat competition on new ideas. One idea replacing another within no time is very common.

Naturally, not all researchers gain the fame of the likes of Newton or Einstein. There have been

numerous researchers who have produced outstanding ideas, yet they are little known outside their

research circles. Though the fame depends on the kind of discovery the researcher has done, fame isn’t

the primary reasons why researchers do research. They do research because they want to do research. If

fame follows, it’s not their fault! However, on many occasions, depending on the popularity of the

problem, researchers know the fame it would fetch when they solve such a problem. (Ask a researcher

who is trying to solve one of the Millennium problems!) The desire for such fame can be tricky.

Sometimes it motivates and sometimes it distracts. Also, on many occasions, discoveries happen all of a

sudden and even to the surprise of the researcher. Researcher might be solving a much lesser known

problem but somehow an idea leads to discovery of much higher magnitude. Bottom line is that,

researcher don’t do research for fame. And those researchers who do research for fame seldom

succeed.

The common misconception among people is that research only relates to fields of science and

technology. This is not true. Research is fundamental to all fields of knowledge, whether be it arts,

sports or sciences. So what is research? Depending on your sensibility, the answer to this question can

be simple or complicated. Curiosity for knowledge is natural to human beings. It is that curiosity that

pushes the human being to acquire knowledge in their field of his/her interest. However, the level of

curiosity and curiosity in which field of knowledge varies from person to person. Music, arts, dance,

sports, science, politics, etc. are all fields of knowledge. Depending on your curiosity in that field, you

choose to acquire more knowledge in that field. In any field that you choose, to be the best among that

field, you need to be a ‘researcher’. The best musician invents new sounds and produces new music, the

best sportsman presents new skills, the best scientist invents new machines or discovers new theories,

and best politician finds new ways to fool people and so on. To be the best in any field, you need to

research on the new ideas, implement them and put it on display.

In this chapter, we shall be taking exclusive of scientific research. However, you can take these ideas and

apply it elsewhere. Most of them are valid for non-scientific fields too.

Page 9: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

3 | P a g e

2 Qualities of a Researcher In previous section, we briefly discussed about the life of researchers and how research applies to all

fields. In this section, we will further probe the lives of researchers and talk about the qualities they

own. Almost all researchers possess some distinct qualities compared to ordinary people. It is these

qualities that help them do research even in the most hostile conditions. The qualities of researchers

include guts to think and question, guts to challenge existing ideas, guts to propose new ideas, guts to

accept new ideas and courage to overcome defeat. Though there isn’t any rule that one must possess

these qualities to be a researcher but given the fact that almost all researchers have these qualities,

these qualities can be used to judge whether a person (ex: student) can be a researcher or not. Also, if

you aspire to be a researcher, make sure that you have these qualities.

Researchers not just exhibit these qualities while doing research but also in their day-to-day life. We

shall now discuss briefly about each of these qualities and why such qualities are essential to doing path-

breaking research.

2.1 Guts to Think and Question

Human beings have the ability to think and decide what is best for them. However, most of us

decide to blindly follow what has been told to us instead of thinking and understanding various

aspects of life. While, we all agree that thinking liberates human being from the shackles of

slavery, but at the same time, we promote blind follower-ship, which is nothing but being slave to

another mind. This weakness of human beings is exploited by politicians, media, religious

preachers, etc. for their benefits.

Especially, in Indian context, ‘the ability to think and question’ is suppressed from the childhood

itself. Children are repeatedly told not to question the elders and follow as they say. In schools

they are told to follow teachers and accept whatever that is written in their books. At religious

places, they are forced not to question what has been written in the scriptures and asked to

perform rituals without understanding them. By the time such child grows up, he/she has lost the

ability to think and question. This social problem is deeply affecting the scientific output of India.

If an event or phenomenon is happening and the cause is unknown, there are two options before

us. The first option is to continue living under the impression that, you can’t do anything about

that event or phenomenon. The second option is to think why that event or phenomenon is

happening and what it means to us. People who choose the second option in their day-to-day

activities have high chances of producing outstanding ideas.

2.2 Guts to challenge existing ideas

Often in life, there is a situation where you know that something is going wrong but you don’t

speak out against it. If we all had the courage to speak-out against wrong stuff, then this planet

would have been a peaceful place to live. But not all of us have the courage to speak out and

challenge the wrongdoers. Similarly, in the context of research, in order to improve science, you

need to have courage to challenge existing ideas.

Page 10: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

4 | P a g e

Science needs to be improved and refined every day. The science of today is more advanced and

better than science of yesterday. Similarly, if the science of future has to be better than that of

todays, it needs to be improved. Improvement cannot happen if one doesn’t challenge existing

ideas. Sometimes the existing ideas might be wrong and such ideas needs to be replaced. An idea

cannot be proved wrong until it’s challenged. Merely opposing an existing idea isn’t challenging

the idea. Keep the following guidelines in mind when you challenge existing ideas:

• The challenge has to happen in the mind of the researcher not necessarily in public. That

is, when you understand something and say you disagree, don’t instantly express your

disagreement in public. Think of a solution to the problem and then challenge.

• Getting into unnecessary debates with your friends or teachers on existing ideas will

only waste your time. Unless you are very lucky, you won’t find supporters. If you have

an idea, publish it. If it is scientifically correct, your friends and teachers have no other

option but to accept it.

• Remember that, until you have something more worthy than the existing idea, people

will not pay attention to your challenge. Anyone Tom, Dick and Harry can challenge.

What really happens is, do you have a solution to the problem. Challenge only if you

have a better solution.

2.3 Guts to propose new ideas

When Galileo discovered telescope, he was able to prove that, earth isn’t center of the universe.

But to propose such idea before everyone involved risk. During the times of Galileo, it was a

religious belief that earth is at the center of the universe. Going against the religious belief was

death penalty. Galileo had to make a decision, whether to propose the new idea or not. He chose

to propose the new idea and subsequently he was killed by poisoning. The story of Galileo doesn’t

end there. In fact, the story of Galileo will not end until the end of human race. Thinking involves

understanding thoroughly about an event or phenomenon. Challenging the existing ideas

regarding an event or phenomenon involves identifying proofs on why the existing ideas are

wrong. And then proposing new ideas involves finding the new explanation about the event or

phenomenon. Researchers must have the guts to propose new ideas.

Keep the following in mind when you propose new ideas:

• When you propose new ideas, make sure that you highlight the limitations and

assumptions of your idea. Don’t exaggerate.

• Don’t use unnecessary verbs to describe your work. Talk in terms of science, more

specifically in terms of mathematics.

• Make sure you do necessary homework before going public with your ideas. Prepare

yourself for criticism.

• Don’t object to criticism. Criticizers are more important than your friends who agree

with your ideas.

Page 11: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

5 | P a g e

• Be scientific but not over confident. Don’t disrespect other researchers and scientists.

Let your research speak for you.

• Be honest about your ideas. You can fool the people but it isn’t people the one who

decide whether your idea is valid or not. If people had the power, politicians would have

been scientists too!

2.4 Guts to accept new ideas

A researcher is not merely someone who questions or proposes new ideas. Researcher is also the

one who accepts the new ideas. One must realize here that, there are millions of researchers

across the world are continuously producing new ideas. Each new idea needs to be critically

analyzed by other researchers and if the idea is found to be better than the previous one, they

must accept such new ideas.

Keep the following in mind when accepting new ideas:

• Be constructive while reviewing the ideas proposed by other researchers. Don’t over

criticize.

• Don’t reject any idea without understanding it. Why should people make an attempt to

understand your ideas when you reject the ideas of others without understanding

them?

• Keep yourself updated with the current research. Appreciate new discoveries. Drop a

letter of appreciation to the author whenever you come across a good research paper.

• Promote new ideas wherever you can, even if those ideas were discovered by the

person whom you hate the most.

• Don’t be biased towards ideas. Being biased towards a particular idea without any

scientific justification reveals the weakness in your character.

• Don’t accept new ideas just because everyone is accepting them. Analyze, understand

and then decide.

2.5 Courage to overcome failure

Failures happen and often people give-up. A good researcher fights all odds to overcome failures.

To overcome any failure, one must first recognize that failure has occurred. The recognition of

failure itself is the first step towards overcoming failure.

Keep the following in mind when you face failures in research:

• If your idea gets proved wrong or is replaced by a better idea, accept the new idea

without being egoistic or sad. Being egoistic or feeling sad about it is not going to help.

Trying improving the new idea.

• If you fail to produce results even after repeated experiments, don’t get disheartened.

Edison did over 2000 experiments over the span of several decades before he was able

Page 12: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

6 | P a g e

to successfully invent light bulb. Let each failure serve as fuel for producing profound

results.

• Analyze your failure and don’t repeat mistakes. If you want to improve science then you

need to improve every day.

• The greatness of the hero lies not in his skills but the villains he defeated. As a

researcher, you would face many villains. Those villains will not accept your ideas;

instead, they would try to suppress you and your ideas. Keep faith in your ideas. If your

ideas are indeed true, they will emerge as a winner.

• Failure forces us to make compromises. Avoid making compromises in life as much as

possible.

• When you face failure, people will start showing their true colors. Don’t feel concerned

that you are losing people. All lesser mortals die and their identity will disappear from

this world. Remind yourself that you aren’t one among them and move on in life.

• ‘Lack of funding’ is an excuse given by untalented or misguided people who claim to be

researchers. True researchers always figure out a way to overcome lack of funding

instead of using as an excuse for not producing outstanding research. Majority of great

experiments were performed by researchers who had no funding. Instead they invented

new devices to conduct their experiments. Also, once a researcher produces

outstanding theoretical results, he/she is bound to get invited to participate in the

renowned experiments.

3 The five acts of researcher In previous sections of this chapter, we discussed about the lives of researchers and the qualities they

possess. Once a student has all the qualities of being a researcher, then by now, he/she must already be

producing new ideas and breaking the conventions. In this section, we will discuss about how a student

must go about doing formal research. Our attempt here is to present a systematic methodology for

carrying out research. Of course, this methodology is just for reference. Your actual journey as a

researcher might be different and revolutionary.

3.1 Read

First and foremost thing as a researcher you must do is ‘read’ as much as possible. Reading helps

you gain knowledge and get a command over subject. Identify the textbooks in the area of your

interest and start reading them. For any particular topic, if you find explanation is missing, try

finding info about that topic on World Wide Web. Common misconception among students is that

WWW has everything and text books are redundant. Even though a lot of information is available

on WWW, in most cases it is not available at one single website. This is where the standard

textbooks scores over WWW. Once, you have gone through at least two standard books in your

area of interest, start reading the journals in that subject. Initially, understanding research papers

can be very difficult as they are written very formally.

Page 13: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

7 | P a g e

Keep the following guidelines in mind when reading textbooks or journals:

• Start from the basics. Unless you are strong in the foundations of the subject, you won’t

be able to challenge existing ideas or produce new ideas.

• Don’t hesitate to refer even to your school textbooks to get an understanding of the

subject. Getting a strong hold on school mathematics is critical to do research in any

branch of science. Refer to Khan Academy Online for excellent lectures on elementary

topics.

• If you get distracted by another subject, do not hesitate to read further about it.

Scientific distractions are good. You are getting distracted by something, because

unknowingly you are finding it interesting. Make advantage of that.

• Do not set time goals on reading. Setting goals such as “will finish reading a particular

book in ‘n’ days” will not help your research. Assume that, you have all the time in the

world to read the book.

• Maintain running notes while reading. Note down important points and questions that

comes across your mind.

• If you come across any formula, spend time deriving that formula. The real pleasure of

understanding the formula comes when you know how to derive it.

3.2 Understand

Reading a subject without understanding is of no use. A rule of thumb: if you are reading a

subject and you aren’t being tempted to understand it then you aren’t interested in that subject.

If that’s happening with you, then choose another subject. There is no point in reading a subject

when you aren’t interested in it. Also, to do research, you need to have a high level of

understanding in that subject. There is a difference between ‘just understanding’ and ‘high level

of understanding’. Keep these points in mind for better understanding

• Every time you read an existing idea, try understanding in what conditions that idea is

valid and what assumptions the author is making.

• Make an attempt to understand why that idea is important to the subject.

• Carefully note down the advantages and limitations of the idea. While doing so, you

might find something that would actually improve the idea.

• Never disrespect or ignore an existing idea. When you disrespect or ignore an idea, you

are losing valuable information. If an idea is wrong, then try replacing it with a better

idea. Sometimes, for lack of better ideas, we adopt ideas which are only approximate.

This doesn’t mean there aren’t better ideas, it just that, as of now it is the best we have.

• Spend time understanding equations and you would start loving them.

Page 14: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

8 | P a g e

3.3 Question

Once you have read and understood a particular subject, you will land on any of the two paths,

both taking you to different destinations. If you land on the first path, you would be completely

satisfied with what you have read and understood and you would have no questions. You would

be convinced whatever you have read is completely true. Or at least, you find no discrepancy in

what you have read. Generally, people who take up teaching profession have landed on the first

path. The second path is rather crazy. Even after reading and understanding, you won’t be

satisfied. You would have hundreds of questions in mind and you find that subject is incomplete.

Generally, researchers land on the second path. If such researcher takes up ‘teaching profession’,

instead of teaching the students about what’s in the subject, such researcher would tend to focus

on what’s incomplete in the subject. That’s why often great researchers don’t make good

teachers. Richard Feynman is an exception!

After reading and understanding a particular subject, if you still have lot of unanswered questions,

then it’s the time for you to start doing research. Generally, a good idea here would be meeting

an expert in the field who can answer some of your questions. However, finding an expert who

can help is very difficult, at least in Indian context. In such cases, participate in discussions on

online forums. Post your questions and have a constructive debate. Also, keep in mind that, on

online forums, even the non-knowledgeable people pose as knowledgeable. Don’t accept any

answer blindly.

Following are some good practices on asking questions:

• Before posing a question to a professor or in an online forum, give them the context on

why such question is important to the subject.

• If you believe your question is advanced then drop an email to professors of various

universities. Explain in detail on why you think such question is important. Some

professors do reply. (My personal experience with Indian professors has been very bad. I

wonder if majority of Indian Professors even check their emails!)

• Always pose the question politely. The answers that you get often depend on how you

pose the question. Note that, science is not owned by anyone. If someone is defending

an idea which you think is wrong, then you don’t have to argue with that person.

• Science is not democracy. The opinion of majority doesn’t matter in Science. In science,

only the truth matters. So, even if majority of the people disagree with you, don’t get

disheartened. When nobody has answers, it’s an indication that, you have to find the

answer through your research.

3.4 Solve

You read the subject, understood it and still you have lot of questions. What does it mean? It

means that, a lot of ideas in that subject can be either improved or replaced. It’s the time for you

start thinking and producing answers to your questions. This is the most exciting phase of time for

Page 15: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

9 | P a g e

the researcher. This is the phase when the researcher is giving birth to new ideas. This is the

phase when the researcher is adding his name to field of science.

If there exists a question and its answer hasn’t been found yet, such question is referred as

‘problem’ in academic circles. To successfully complete a PhD, one must solve a ‘problem’ of

important nature. A famous quote is that, ‘a researcher doesn’t choose a problem to solve, the

problem choses the researcher’. The meaning of the quotation is not that, a researcher will be

assigned to solve a problem but rather it means, unknowing the researcher will be led to solving

such problem. To produce outstanding research, you have to choose a problem that you find

interesting. Unless you find pleasure in working on that problem, you won’t be able to dedicate

your uninterrupted attention towards it.

Following are some good practices on solving the problems:

• As a researcher, you should find abundant open problems in this universe. Pick the

problem that gives you immense pleasure in solving.

o Note for PhD students: Don’t choose the problem because your guide wants

it to solve. Choose the problem that you would find pleasure in solving.

• Believe in yourself that you are going to solve the problem no matter what. People

would try to bring down your confidence, don’t give up.

• For every solution you arrive, note down carefully all conditions and assumptions you

are making.

• Frequently discuss about the problem with someone who has no knowledge about the

problem. Explain the problem to such person and tell them why it’s important. Often

such discussion leads to a solution.

• Take criticism constructively. Whenever someone critics your approach or solution,

take some time out to think, why you are being criticized. All great researchers face

criticism, so don’t be disappointed or frustrated at criticizer’s remarks.

• Don’t reduce the scope of the problem by making unnecessary assumptions.

• Don’t pressurize yourself by setting time-limits for solving the problem.

• Sometimes, solving the problem can be frustrating. You might find it far more complex

than you actually expected it to be. Naturally, you would get angry because of it, which

might affect your personal life. If you are in a relationship, it might affect it too. If your

partner doesn’t understand your situation, then you might have to choose between

your partner and the problem. (Remember that, you can get a partner after you solve

the problem, but once you lose the problem, you can’t get it!)

• Remember that, solution requires just one idea and such idea can arrive at any time.

Make sure that, you note down every idea you get. Many times, new ideas arrive at

odd times and we tend to forget them. It’s really difficult to recollect them again.

• When you are trying to solve a problem, it is always a good idea to start writing a

‘book’ in that subject. If you end-up solving the problem, the book will serve as a

reference in that field.

Page 16: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

10 | P a g e

3.5 Publish

The most difficult phase in the life of the researcher is ‘publish’ phase. After a researcher solves a

problem, he/she has to publish the solution in a standard journal or a conference. Keep the

following guidelines in mind while publishing papers:

• After you complete your paper, think about which journal suits your paper. Top journals

accept only those papers which present solutions to important problems. Don’t be over

ambitious. Know the type of problem you have solved. Depending on the value of the

problem you have solved, select an appropriate journal.

• Make sure that you are submitting the paper to a journal of considerable repute. Read

the papers published by that journal before submitting your paper to it.

• Now-a-days, a lot of journals are advertising themselves using a term called impact-

factor. Don’t let such advertisements make you fooled. Impact-factor can be inflated

and is not a testimonial for the quality of the journal.

• Most of the journals have Editorial committees for namesake. Don’t make a decision of

submitting your paper to that journal just because it has so and so member in its

editorial committee.

• Rate the journal based on its readership than based on impact-factor. Publishing your

paper in a journal of high impact factor doesn’t guarantee citations for your paper. Your

paper gets citations only when it makes significant contribution to that subject. A good

paper published in a journal that has sufficient readership is bound to attract large

audience.

• If your paper gets rejected, it doesn’t necessarily mean your solution is wrong. It could

be because you haven’t been able to express yourself properly. Polish your words and

try to be as clear as possible. Take feedback about your writing style from a non-

technical person. Simplicity of writing is a hallmark of all great researchers.

4 Finding a research guide Finding good professors who can guide for research can be very difficult. And it becomes even more

difficult if the student is looking out for a professor who can guide for PhD in Indian Universities.

Approaching a wrong professor for guidance can be very damaging psychologically and physically. Often

students give up their enthusiasm for research just because some professor ill-treated or has

discouraged them. In India, the general perception among all is that every professor is capable of

guiding students for research. And often students fall victim to such perception. Guiding students for

doing research is an art and that’s not obtained by gaining a PhD degree. For that matter, there is no

degree that certifies whether a professor has the capability to guide students or not. In such a case, how

do you identify good professors? Honestly, guidance depends on the inter-personal relationship

between the student and the professor. And it varies from person to person. Nonetheless, following are

some tips on how to identify a good professor for research guidance:

Page 17: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

11 | P a g e

• Approach only those professors who are actively pursuing research in the field of your

interest. Someone who has done PhD several years ago and hasn’t kept himself/herself

updated with current research won’t be able to guide you on research. Approaching

such professors will be waste of your time.

• Generally, the ‘research-oriented’ professors are the ones who regularly visit journals

section of your university library.

• Good teachers might not be good researchers. Therefore, don’t approach a professor

just because he/she is teaching a particular subject very well. That professor might just

be doing a ‘teaching job’ but not research. Generally, good teachers tend to defend the

stuff written in books rather than critically pointing the problematic areas where further

research is needed.

• Search the name of the concerned professor on internet. If he/she has published quality

research papers, then you should be able to find several links pointing to the papers.

Read about the research done by your professor. You would be able to get some idea on

the knowledge of the professor.

• Read at least two papers written by the professor before approaching. If you aren’t able

download/obtain the papers written by him/her, then approach the professor for those

papers. Note that, if the papers are readily available for download and yet you have

approached the professor for a copy of those papers, he/she would consider you dumb

and incapable to do research. In this modern era, a student who can’t search and find

content on internet, can’t do research. If a student can’t find the content that’s already

available, how can you expect such student to discover new content?

• While reading the papers written by the professor, make sure you take down some

notes. When you approach the professor, those notes would be highly useful during the

conversation with the professor.

• Before you approach the professor for a conversation, take an appointment. Before you

start the conversation, ask the professor whether he is busy with some other work.

• When you approach the professor for guidance, don’t directly start the conversation by

stating what you need. Good professors will guide you only when they find the

intellectual spark in the conversation. Discuss the latest paper you have read and the

related research ideas you have. Agreeing to every idea proposed by the professor is not

the trait of a researcher. Ask questions and don’t be afraid to debate on an idea. Good

professors love intellectual debates.

• During the first conversation itself, if the professor tilts the discussion towards research

funding or bureaucratic work, then he/she isn’t capable of guiding you for research. A

good professor always discusses ideas during first conversation.

Page 18: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

12 | P a g e

About the Author:

Mohammed Abubakr is a physicist and an author of book

titled ‘Cosmos Redefined’. He has published 12 research

papers in journals and conferences in subjects such as optical

solitons, VLSI and cosmology.

He is currently working at Microsoft India as performance

engineer. Though settled in Hyderabad, Abubakr is an avid

traveller and has travelled to four different continents. When

at Hyderabad, he lives with his telescope, an SLR camera and a

motorbike.

Page 19: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

13 | P a g e

Every year above 5, 00,000 engineers are passing out from the 1500 technical colleges as per the

details from the formal technical education board of India.

Populace has started misinterpreting that engineering and technical courses have just turned into a

simple graduation degree leading to fall in quality education. Getting into an engineering college has

become so simple that it is now difficult by a fresher to crack corporate entry with good job profile and

salary.

Top policy makers are worried that post graduate studies in engineering are abysmally low and only

about 5% of the engineering graduates continue to complete M-Tech and, of these only 3% go on to do

a doctorate. This not only causes a severe shortage of qualified faculty, it also blunts the edge in

research and innovation.

Here comes the need of academic research and investigation in various areas of science and

engineering that can add value to the technical education. Creating research interests among the

young talents can ignite great innovations. This chapter inculcates such interests among students which

will guide them with basic information and awareness on paper presentation.

The four major queries that students generally ask about paper presentation are:

• What is a Paper?

• How to write Research Papers?

• Where to submit Papers?

• Benefits of Paper Presentation / Publication

Page 20: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

14 | P a g e

2.1 What is a Paper?

We can describe papers as working drafts of research that often appears in final form as publications.

However the published version of the paper may differ from the working version. Depending on the

usability, papers can be categorized into Regulatory or business papers and technical / research papers.

2.1.1 Regulatory / Business

2.1.1a Green Papers

Green Paper is a government report which is published to stimulate discussion and launch the process

of consultation. They invite individuals or organizations to participate who can contribute their views

and information on the basis of the proposals they put forward.

It is a tentative document of a proposal without any commitment to action and is limited to the

knowledge economy. They are produced early in the policymaking process, while ministerial proposals

are still being formulated.

However Green Paper may give rise to legislative developments that are then outlined in White Paper,

an official set of proposals that is used as a vehicle for their development into law.

2.1.1b White Papers

White Papers generally refer to documents used by businesses as marketing or sales tools and as

marketing communications to promote a specific company's solutions or products. It combines high-

level business benefits with technical details in a single document.

They make a business case for a certain technology or methodology and describe how a certain

technology works and highlight information favorable to the company authorizing or sponsoring the

paper. Such white papers are often used to generate sales leads, establish thought leadership, make a

business case, or to educate customers

2.1.2 Technical / Research

In academic publishing, a research paper is an academic work that is usually published in an academic

journal. It contains original research results or reviews existing results. Such a paper, also called an

article, will only be considered valid if it undergoes a process of peer review by one or more referees in

order to check that the content of the paper is suitable for publication in the journal.

2.1.2a Contributed Papers

The research work documented by Research Scholars, Academicians, Scientists, Professors and Industry

Professionals at an academic level can be termed as Contributed Papers. This requires original research

work will well simulated results, tabulated readings, graphs, etc.

2.1.2b Student Papers

It is an opportunity given to under-graduate and post-graduate students to express their ideas and

imaginations in terms of emerging trends. This need not be an original innovation but the involvement

of the student in the paper is highly essential.

Page 21: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

15 | P a g e

2.2a How to write research papers?

2.2a.1 Selection of Topic

The first step in preparing a research paper is the selection of topic. It is advisable to the authors to

always prefer selecting the topic from his/her area of interest. This would enable the author to

contribute his/her best while carrying out their research.

2.2a.2 Choice of Co-Author

Co-author is a collaborating or joint author who shares the writing of the research article with the

author of the paper. The co-author plays an important role in planning, executing and preparing stages

of a manuscript. While choosing a co-author it is extremely important to have the ‘area of interest’ of

the co-author to match with that of the author so that they can mutually contribute in preparing the

paper.

2.2a.3 Gathering Information

Research papers generally require directed information gathering, which includes looking for sources

online and in the library that will support your manuscript. Books are generally a great resource that

often contains a lot of information gathered into one place, and they can give you a more thorough

investigation of your topic. However sometimes a book can have a great title, but no information and

on the other hand, a book that doesn't seem to go along with what you are doing can turn out to have

a lot of usable information.

Another great place to look for information in a library is periodical literature in the form of journals,

magazines and newsletters which are published monthly, bi-monthly, quarterly, etc. However internet

is the major source that provides information.

Memberships with professional bodies and societies like IEEE, IETE, ISTE, CITS, etc benefit the authors

with newsletters and proceedings.

2.2a.4 Segregating Information

There are a lot of resources on the internet that are not going to be valuable to you. Part of your

internet research will include evaluating the resources that you find. Personal web pages are not a

good source to go by as they often have incorrect information on them and can be very misleading. Be

sure that your internet information is from a recognized source such as the government, an agency that

you are sure is a credible source, or a credible news source.

Taking notes is an important part of doing research. You should take notes on ideas and concepts that

you think are important to include in your paper. You also can include supporting examples that would

be helpful to refer to. You should NOT write the words down exactly as they appear on the page, unless

you are putting them in quotations. Otherwise, you might accidentally write them into your paper that

way, and that would be plagiarism.

Summarizing and paraphrasing are similar to quoting in that you are recording the author's ideas.

However, when you summarize or paraphrase, you record ideas as opposed to exact language; the

language is yours. Any time you summarize or paraphrase, you MUST acknowledge the source of your

information. Not only is it a professional requirement, it is a way to avoid plagiarism.

Page 22: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

16 | P a g e

2.2a.5 Formatting the Paper

Most of the periodicals have a standardized system for formatting research papers and citing

resources. You can write a paper that conforms to standard guidelines by following its rules. Your paper

will appear professional and scholarly and readers will easily understand how to find your resources.

Also chances of paper selection is more for a well formatted paper

2.2b General Steps for preparing an academic research paper:

2.2b.1 Title

This is an opening and important part of a paper because this would bring the readers to be interested

in your article. The authors should always try choosing a catchy title and use good punctuation and

grammar. Therefore this should be as attractive as possible. However it should truly reflect your

scientific work; in other words what you have achieved by doing this work. Avoid giving general titles.

For example, “The effects of serotonin in placental vascular reactivity” is a better heading than

“placental vascular reactivity” because the former one is specific to the work carried out and the data

obtained.

Page 23: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

17 | P a g e

Sometimes scientists start working with the belief that they would obtain positive results (or a positive

co-relation); however the data and the statistical analysis may have given a negative interpretation. In

this case there is no harm in giving a negative heading (e.g. “Substance P does not produce vascular

relaxation in placental vessels”). This is perfectly acceptable as it truly reflects the data obtained.

2.2b.2 Authors and Affiliation

It is usual to list the authors in the order of their involvement with the investigation. That is the

scientist who carried out most of the work becomes first author. However the senior author (i.e. the

main supervisor who had the grant to do the investigation) is listed at the end. This is important

because it gives the readers the information about the investigators and the institutions involved in this

study. Therefore they can contact one of the authors (mostly the senior author) for clarification, and

collaborations. It also gives fame to the authors and their affiliated institutes.

Name and Details of authors mentioning the department,

name of organization, postal and digital address

2.2b.3 Abstract

An abstract is a brief summary of a research article that summarises the major aspects of the entire

paper. It usually has the limit of 250 to 500 words. Therefore it should be brief with the following

prescribed sequence;

• The research question(s) and the purpose (from Introduction) - State the purpose very clearly

in the first or second sentence.

• Information about the experimental design and methods used, (from Methods) - Clearly

express the basic design of the study (without giving excessive details).

• The major findings including key quantitative results, or trends (from Results) - Report the data

that give answers to the research questions

• A brief summary of the interpretations and conclusions. (from Discussion) - Clearly state the

implications of the data should be clearly stated.

Page 24: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

18 | P a g e

Abstracts are widely and readily available to the scientific community via internet, and therefore it

should be concise and make an impact on to the readers. Avoid lengthy background information or

references to other literature, abbreviations or terms that may be confusing to readers, and any sort of

illustration, figure, or table.

2.2b.4 Introduction

The function of the introduction is to establish the context of the work being reported. It should discuss

the relevant primary research literature (with citations) and a summary of current understanding of the

problem which is being investigated. It should describe what has been carried out in this field and

highlight the importance of current investigation. State the purpose of the work in the form of the

hypothesis, question, or problem you have investigated. Briefly explain the rationale, the approach and

the possible outcome that this study can reveal.

Relevant information from original research articles should be used to “build-up” the introduction.

Most importantly give credit to the original authors by citing them (and giving details of the whole

article in the reference section).

2.2b.5 Methodology

This is the easiest section to write in a paper. Methods have been carried out by the authors in their

investigation and therefore they should remember it. However make it a pint to describe the protocol

in sufficient detail that other scientists could repeat this work to verify the findings. This section should

also include details of hypotheses tested, controls, treatments, variables measured, how many

replicates, what was measured, what form the data, and how the data was analysed (statistical

analysis). Always identify treatments by the variable or treatment name, NOT by an ambiguous, generic

name or number. If the paper includes more than one experiment, use subheadings to help the

presentation.

Page 25: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

19 | P a g e

2.2b.6 Results

This section should contain the key (but not all) results without any form of interpretation. It should be

presented in a logical sequence using illustrative materials (Tables and Figures) to support the text.

Summaries of the statistical analyses may appear either in the text (usually parenthetically) or in the

relevant tables or figures (in the legend or as footnotes to the table or figures). The text of the results

section follows the sequence of tables, graphs and figures to highlight the answers to the questions

investigated. Important negative results should be reported, too.

Write the text of the Results section concisely and objectively in passive voice. Always use the past

tense, as the results have already been obtained. Avoid repetitive paragraph structures. Do not

interpret the data here.

2.2b.7 Discussion

This is the major and the most difficult section to write. This is the place where the results should be

interpreted and critically analyzed in relation to published data. Try to explain how the results have

improved the understandings of the subject or problem. The discussion should always connect to the

introduction by way of the question(s) or hypotheses in the literature cited. Note this is not a simple

repeat or rearrangement of the Introduction. Instead, it tells how this study has moved the scientific

community forward.

Following questions may help to structure the discussion

• Do these results provide answers to the testable hypotheses? If so, how it can be interpreted?

• Do these findings agree with what others have shown? If not, is there any alternative

explanation for this finding; or are there any un-foreseen design flaws in the current

experiment?

• What would be the next step in this study (e.g., what experiments can be carried out next? This

is important as it tells the reader that the authors intend to continue this investigation in

future.

2.2b.7 Conclusion

Finally try to explain what conclusions can be drawn from this study. Always remember most of the

investigations do not give any clear conclusions (if so, then there is no future for this investigation!).

Therefore avoid sentences like “from these results it can be concluded” instead use “the data from this

study suggest”. Now days it is extremely difficult to conclusively and flawlessly prove anything in

science.

2.2b.8 Acknowledgements

If, in your experiment, you received any significant help in designing, or carrying out the work, or

received materials from someone who did you a favour by supplying them, you must acknowledge

their assistance and the service or material provided.

Page 26: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

20 | P a g e

2.2b.9 References/Literature cited

Most of the scientific journals expect the authors to give a reference list either according to (a)

chronological order of their citation in the body of the text (also known as Vancouver style of

referencing) or (b) alphabetical order of first author's last name (Harvard style of referencing). Each

journal expects different style of referencing and therefore it is important to read “the instructions to

authors” section carefully before you start writing your article.

Please note that reference list is different from “Bibliography”, as the later contains references that are

used to get the background knowledge (but not specific to the paper). Bibliography sections are found

in books and other literary writing, but not scientific journal-style papers.

2.3 Where to submit Papers?

In most of the cases authors write research papers and then consider where to submit them. But the

decision is best made early, before the writing begins. In this way the paper can be geared

appropriately to the scientific readers.

The following are some of the most excellent places where you can exhibit your research work based

on the level of the paper:

2.3.1 Technical Symposiums

If the paper is prepared by a beginner preferable by engineering or science student to express his/her

ideas or imaginations over what he/she has well-read from their regular subjects, then a technical

symposium conducted by academic institutions would be a right platform to exhibit the work.

Technical symposiums are generally referred to as paper presentation contests where students

compete with their co-participants for a best paper. The presentation skills of the author along with the

technical content are considered as weightage and are awarded accordingly.

Further details of Technical Symposium can be found in 3.1.1 page-25

Page 27: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

21 | P a g e

2.3.2 Conferences

In most cases a conference is considered as a meeting for exchange of information with a formal

agenda. An academic conference is such a program for researchers to present and discuss their work.

Conferences provide an important channel for exchange of information between researchers with the

participation of professionals from research centres, government organizations, corporate agencies,

and people from industrial sector apart from academicians and students.

Further details of Conferences can be found in 3.2 page-26

2.3.3 Publications

If an author desires to make his/her content available to the public, the research work may have to be

submitted to organizations involved in publications. However the author of a work remains the initial

owner who in turn can transfer its ownership to others.

In academic publishing the research work is generally submitted in the form a manuscript for possible

publication in a scientific journal or a technical magazine.

Further details of Journals can be found in 3.6 page-31

2.3.4 Patents

Apart from academic research the authors should also be aware of how to commercialize his/her

research. Since every innovation involves years of research, huge resources, energy, and time of a

researcher it is important to focus on the outcome of the work.

A patent is an exclusive right given by law to inventors to make use of, and exploit, their inventions for

a limited period of time. By granting the inventor a temporary monopoly in exchange for a full

description of how to perform the invention, patents play a key role in developing industry around the

world.

Further details of Patents can be found in 6.2 page-55

2.4 Benefits of Paper Presentation / Publication

Most of the students are unaware of the benefits that they can get in the long run by contributing in

paper presentation and producing research outputs. It is very true that any research requires

encouragement from funding bodies and approvals from universities / institutes. It is very essential

that innovative ideas do get dissipated due to some limitations.

A researcher should always continue to produce when ever he/she gets a chance to work on. However

if there are no possibilities to make research a profession, it can still be continued as a hobby.

Page 28: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

22 | P a g e

The following are some of the benefits that a researcher can avail:

• Distinguished Student / Engineer

• Increases employment potential

• Enhances your career

• Appreciation from College / University

• Well respected by Academicians

• Considered for technical committees

• Will stand unique among fellow students

• Remembered by Mentors / Guides

• Awards & Recognition

Other benefits of paper presentation and publishing include:

• Promoting creativity and critical thinking skills

• Encouraging collaborative learning

• Refining communication skills

• Developing enthusiasm for scholarly pursuits

• Feelings of competence and familiarity with the entire research process

• Obtaining feedback from independent reviewers

2.5 Pl agiarism

Plagiarism has long been a problem in education which is further aggravated by the advent of the

internet and the worldwide. Therefore, Higher Education institutions in the developed countries are

following certain rules in academic writing. A working knowledge of these rules is critically important for

undergraduates (and postgraduates) to avoid plagiarism. The concept of ‘undergraduate plagiarism’ is

well focused and researched. However, the information on plagiarism at school level is limited. One

recent study on avoiding plagiarism at secondary school level has concluded that ‘attempts should be

made to engage the students to evade plagiarism’ (McGregor and Williamson, 2005).

Therefore, when an undergraduate enters the university he/she may be unaware of good academic

practice and methods needed to avoid plagiarism. The universities in developing countries may not be

so insistent on documenting sources or the concept of ‘plagiarism’. These institutions, as Yamada (2003)

puts, may also take into consideration of (a) students’ inability to understand the new concepts which

are mainly written in English - a language other than their mother tongue and (b) their cultural beliefs.

Most of the universities are incorporating lectures, seminars and student workshops to enhance the

ability of all students (both home and especially international) to understand plagiarism and most

importantly how to avoid it. This is carried out via implementation of institutions’ policies without

evidence that these formative lectures/seminars are actually improving the students’ academic writing

skills.

Page 29: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

23 | P a g e

Since learning and writing in a second language is a continuous process, it is not clear whether these

‘one day’ seminars can help the students to improve their academic writing skills. This study aims to

investigate whether formative lectures alone would (a) enhance the students’ understanding of

plagiarism and (b) improve their academic writing and avoidance of plagiarism.

References:

[1] Notes on "Gathering information for essays which require research" from State University of

New York Empire State College http://www.esc.edu

[2] Robert A. Day and Barbara Gastel - How to write and publish a scientific paper? Sixth Edition,

Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org/9780521671675

[3] Stephen Bailey - Academic Writing: A Handbook for International Students (Routledge Study

Guides) [Paperback].

[4] John Swales , Christine B. Feak - Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks and

Skills (Michigan Series in English for Academic & Professional Purposes) [Paperback].

[5] James Hartley - Academic Writing and Publishing: A Practical Handbook [Paperback]

[6] Beasley, JD (2004) The impact of technology on plagiarism prevention and detection: research

process automation – a new approach for prevention Proceedings on Plagiarism: prevention,

Practice & Policy (eds) Smith AP and Duggan F (Plagiarism Advisory Service) 23-30.

[7] Brogan KM and Brogan JD (1983) Yet another ethical problem in technical writing.

[8] ERIC, Reviewed in Pecorari (2003)

[9] Currie, P (1998) Staying out of trouble: Apparent plagiarism and academic survival. Journal of

Second Language Writing, 7(1) 1-18.

[10] Deckert, GD (1993) Perspectives on plagiarism from ESL students in Hong Kong Journal of

Second Language Writing, 2(2), 131-148

[11] Howard, RM (1995) Plagiarism, authorships, and the academic death penalty College English 57,

788-806

[12] Sivasubramaniam, SD (2004) Plagiarism amongst biomedical science undergraduates concerned

academics versus ignorant students. Proceedings on Plagiarism: prevention, Practice & Policy

(eds) Smith AP and Duggan F (Plagiarism Advisory Service) 205-224.

Page 30: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

24 | P a g e

About the Authors:

Hafeez Basha. R

Hafeez Basha. R did his B-Tech in Electrical and Electronics Engineering

from Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, JNTU Hyderabad and M-

Tech in Computer Science Engineering from Acharya Nagarjuna University,

Guntur.

He is recipient of Young Scientist Award and was earlier Research Engineer

Trainee at Pentagram Research Centre. He is currently working as Research

Analyst with the scientific division of Thomson Reuters, worlds’ leading

Information company that accelerates research, scientific discovery and

innovation globally.

He served as Advisory / Technical member in various expert committees

and even organized International Conferences and Technical Symposiums.

He is also Managing Editor for International Journals published by Cafet-

Innova Technical Society an international non-profit organization helping

the scientific community.

S. D. Sivasubramaniam

Dr. Shiva Das Sivasubramaniam is module leader and research supervisor

for M.Sc and Ph. D projects, course developer for pharmacology and

physiology and International student recruitment officer at School of

Science & Technology, Nottingham Trent University, UK.

His research interests include Pre-eclampsia and pre-natal medicine. He is

serving as Vice-President of Cafet-Innova Technical Society and Editor-in-

Chief for International Journal of Biological Sciences and Engineering.

He is also an Advisor for plagiarism prevention, assisting students to avoid

plagiarism at Nottingham Trent University, UK.

Page 31: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

25 | P a g e

Participation in technical programs and presenting research papers is very essential for students,

researchers, scientists, academicians and professors. This chapter gives an insight on the importance of

such technical programs with clarity on each type of program and its significance. Technical

symposiums, conferences, workshops, seminars and guest lectures are some of the most common

technical programs. The main reason to have a separate chapter on importance of technical programs

and publications is to give lucidity in identifying a particular program and distinguishing it with other

programs. There are situations where the event is organized as a workshop but it turns out to be a

symposium or a seminar. This chapter shall help the organizers in correctly taking up the technical

program and conduct the event accordingly.

3.1 Symposiums

3.1.1. What is a Symposium?

Symposium is an educational event where participants get together to discuss thoughts and exchange

ideas, rather than to be lectured at. It is generally regarded as a meeting of the minds to discuss a

specific topic.

3.1.2. How to conduct a Symposium?

The first needed in order to conduct a symposium, is a huge topic. A topic that many people have

expressed a need to address. The topic can refer to acquiring safety equipment in the gymnasiums at a

particular school district; many people have voiced an opinion about already. Set a date, hire an event

planner, invite your distinguished experts on your topic, and invite the crowd. There you have your

symposium.

Page 32: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

26 | P a g e

The invitation for the participants may be in the form of brochures, pamphlets, posters, emails etc. Ex:

International Engineering Symposium 2011(IES 2011) organized by Kumamoto University, JAPAN on 3rd

- 5th March, 2011 It intends to provide a common platform for bringing together researchers from

universities and research organizations in India and Japan for expanding academic collaboration. This

event focuses on the current research and development activities in both countries on topics of current

interest, with special emphasis on “Engineering & Technology”. It is expected that the emerging

technologies and scientific advancements in these themes will be disseminated during the Symposium.

Presentations will also feature new and innovative technologies in the relevant fields.34th International

Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment on April 10-15, 2011 at Sydney, Australia.

3.2 Conferences

An academic conference is a large gathering of students, researchers, scientists, academicians and

professors along with participation from industry and corporate companies to share their ideas and

research work. The conferences are generally organized by academic institutions, colleges, universities,

Government bodies or non-profit scientific societies and professional bodies. Conferences provide an

important channel for exchange of information between researchers together with academic or

scientific journals. Conferences are mainly of three categories:

3.2.1a Themed Conference:

These conferences are organized by specific departments or scientific groups on their relevant theme or

related area. They invite participants for discussing about the emerging and current trends in that

particular stream only. These events are held annually or sometimes on regular basis.

Ex:

a) International Conference on Advances in Civil Engineering organizing by Department of Civil

Engineering, KL University, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, INDIA.

b) International Conference on Earth Sciences and Engineering (ICEE) organized by CAFET-INNOVA

Technical Society (CITS) with the collaboration of Malla Reddy Group of Institutions, Hyderabad

on 21st

August, 2010.

3.2.1b General Conference:

These conferences are organized with a wider focus, with sessions on a wide variety of topics and invite

participants from different streams to discuss on common platform. This is not theme specific but

instead a general program with broader theme.

Ex: International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering (ICETE) organized by Dr. J J Magdum

College of Engineering, Jaysinghpur, Maharastra with technical support of CAFET- INNOVA Technical

Society (CITS) on 20th

February, 2010.

Page 33: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

27 | P a g e

3.2.1c Professional Conference:

It differs from an academic conference and has broader objectives with greater number of participants.

These are usually organized on a national or international basis by federations or groups of the national

societies in a subject. These are often held annually, or some other recurring basis.

Ex: Conference held by the International Federation of Library Associations (IFLA).

Apart from the above three categories, conferences can also be classified as National conference if it is

organized by one nation; Conferences between two countries like Indo-Japanese Conference, etc.;

Continental conferences like Asian Conference, European Conference, etc.; and International

conferences with participation from different countries.

3.2.2 Call for papers:

Conferences are generally inviting papers from the authors by the way of Call For Papers in one or more

announcements. In these announcements they clearly mention the main themes of conference and who

has to send the papers for the conference. The International Conferences generally ask the abstracts in

their first announcement. After completion of the review on abstracts they prepare the selected

abstracts list and based on the same in their second announcement they call the Full length papers from

the authors. Those papers again forwarded to the review committee by the organizing committee. The

announcement in the form of Brochures, pamphlets, posters, emails etc.

3.2.3 Paper Selection Process for Conference:

Once the organizing committee receives the abstracts from authors, they are forwarded to the

conference evaluation or review committee. After evaluation the committee sends its comments on

each individual paper to the organizing committee. As per the comments the organizing committee

prepares the list of selected abstracts along with the comments. The selected authors are then asked to

send their full length paper before the dead line.

After review of full length papers few are accepted with minor or major corrections and intimated to the

corresponding author. The authors then need to present this paper before the session chair during the

conference after registration.

3.2.4 Registration for Conference:

The authors may have to register their paper for the conference by paying registration fee to avail the

conference kits, proceedings, food and other facilities. The registration amount will be varying from

conference to conference depending on the organizing institution or social body. Based on the selected

list of papers the committee arranges parallel sessions for oral presentation during the conference.

Page 34: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

28 | P a g e

3.2.5 Presentations during conference:

Presentations tend to be short and concise, with a time span of about 10 to 20 minutes; they are usually

followed by a discussion. In the themed conferences all the selected papers will be presented by the

authors in a single session since all the papers come under single theme, and even the participants

belongs to same specialization. In General and Professional conferences the selected papers will be

separated as per the theme and arrange number of parallel sessions during the conference for

presentations. Every session should have one session chair (area expert) and one session co –chair

(another expert) who shall lead the whole session and give ranking to the presentations.

3.2.6 Conference proceedings:

Proceedings are generally collection of all accepted full length conference papers that are published in

the context of an academic conference. They are generally printed in the form of books and distributed

to all the participants of the conference. The collection of papers are generally organized by editorial

team (one or more persons belongs to same organization). After receiving the papers for the conference

the editorial team reviews the papers and accepts the same for proceedings. Proceedings are published

in-house, by the organizing institution of the conference, or via an academic or commercial publisher.

Increasingly, proceedings are published in electronic format on CD only, or distributed on Internet.

Note: The papers published in conference proceeding will not be considered as publications unless it is

published in an academic journal. For this reason most of the conferences work in tie-up with journal

publishers and bring out journal special issues based on conference.

3.2.7 Sponsors

The identity of the sponsors is an indicator of the quality of the conference. The conferences organized

by commercial companies go for profit-making and the papers presented at such conferences are

generally of lower quality. In most cases, conferences sponsored by professional bodies, non-profit

societies, universities or groups of academics are worth participating.

3.2.8 Location

Location of the conference is an important factor for the success of the event. Major conferences held in

capital cities are often easier to attend in terms of transport and accommodation. Huge participation

can be expected for such conferences, unlike the one organized in remote places.

3.2.9 Theme

If the conference covers a broad area, it is likely that the audience will be bigger, with added benefits in

terms of exposure and networking. At the same time, it may be hard to find participants with a serious

interest in particular area of research. A smaller conference tends to be more tightly focused and is

possible that you will find yourself in closer contact with the experts in your field. You will need to strike

a balance in such cases.

Page 35: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

29 | P a g e

3.2.10 Benefits:

Attending conferences is a critical part of scientific networking in these days. However, you will gain the

most benefit if you present a paper as the conference papers are a means by which you can attract the

attention of potential experts and influence academic debate in your field.

Some other benefits of presenting a conference paper include:

• A higher personal profile

• Early dissemination of the results of your research

• Opportunities to receive useful criticism

• Experience in the process of peer-review

• Interact with well experienced people

• Lean more advanced trends in your research

3.3 Academic Workshops

3.3.1. What is an Academic Workshop?

Academic Workshops are generally training programs, established for the students, academicians,

researchers and professors. This is the best way of sharing information regarding the educational

research innovations as well as the progress in all fields of studies. One of the most important features

about the workshops is that they allow you to acquire a required experience of studying and improve

useful skills when practicing. They also give an opportunity to find out more information that can be of

use for future learning and beyond the college. Many organizations arrange a course of workshops

lasting from few days to several weeks. Workshops which last more than several hours presuppose

other activities. Now a day’s workshops are an excellent option for academicians to share knowledge

and learn emerging trends in their study area.

3.3.2. Why are academic workshops so valuable?

During the educational workshop the participants gain useful priceless experience and form the abilities

of research work. Besides they may get to know more info concerning the topic of the studies, the

methodology and research way of the study they chose as their field, get familiar with the instances and

practical issues which are coupled to the subject of their research this or that way. These are generally

held by professionals from all over the world. During these workshops we can interact with well

experienced people and lean so many things from them for our bright future. We can also visit new

places or sometimes these workshops are conducted by premier universities, we can know about their

system, facilities, courses offered for students etc.

Ex: National workshop on “Paper Presentation Awareness & Research Methodology” organized by

CAFET-INNOVA Technical Society at Hyderabad definitely creates an excellent research interests among

engineering and science students. For all the academicians this is right platform for get an excellent

knowledge about paper presentations, preparation and publication of research papers and research

methodologies.

Page 36: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

30 | P a g e

The educational institutions generally organize national workshops for their students and faculty

developments. Sometimes well institutions collaborate with foreign universities and organize

international workshops on advanced research areas. These brings good exposure for those

organizations and participants also get enormous knowledge from those training programs and

participants should have an excellent opportunity to learn highly advanced technologies in their

research areas.

3.4 Seminars

Seminar is generally a large lecture by an expert in the particular area or subject. It is generally

organized by academic institution or professional or commercial organization. These seminars start

vfrom class room and ends at international. Seminars are generally technical and general seminars.

Technical seminars are mainly covers advanced trends and applications of technical topics such as

Technical Seminar on “Computer Aided Design” or “Geographical Information System” or “Embedded

Systems” etc.

A “Seminar,” according to Webster's dictionary, is a group of advanced students studying under a

professor with each 0doing original research and all exchanging results through reports and discussions.

A presentation is more like a lecture, a speech, or a sales presentation, made by one person, usually

with the opportunity for the audience to ask a few questions afterwards.

A seminar is more like a workshop, where the presenter offers some information in a participatory

learning setting, and the participants discuss among each other and/or ask questions of the presenter.

Then they move on to the next topic.

Seminar and Presentation are two different things. Seminar is based on a theme whereas presentation is

based on a subject. There can be many presentations in a seminar. A seminar can be whole day affair

whereas a presentation is short. In short, a presentation can be a subset of a seminar whereas the

reverse is not true. I would expect a seminar to be more educational than a presentation. In t seminar

everyone has an equal right to be heard and an equal responsibility for keeping the seminar working

properly. The most difficult and important skill in effective seminar participation is good listening. You

need to attend carefully to what others are saying. And then you need to learn to respond intelligently

and helpfully.

A seminar is not just a collection of individual points of view declared one after the other. It has a

rhythm, often an unpredictable rhythm, which is established, above all, by the ways in which the

participants respond to each other. If someone’s contribution is puzzling, then ask him to continue,

taking care of a particular trouble you have with a point he raised. If the contribution is very good, tell

the speaker so. If you disagree or have an alternative point, then put that on the table. As in a

conversation, in a seminar the participant has to be prepared to be flexible, adjusting her participation

to what is happening moment by moment throughout the seminar. This is the major challenge of the

process.

Page 37: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

31 | P a g e

3.5 Guest Lectures

3.5.1. What is Guest Lecture?

Guest lecture is usually a lecture given by an expert in particular discipline or well experienced in

research and came from outside of the organization. These are generally organized by academic

institutions for create awareness and motivating the students and faculty on advanced disciplines or

technologies or research methods and applications. Sometimes corporate companies also conduct guest

lecturers to train their staff members in advances technologies. The person who gives guest lecture is

generally called as guest speaker.

3.5.2. Who is Guest Speaker?

Guest speaker, the person who is well experience in a particular subject or discipline or research and

belongs to well known organization. By the special invitation of academic or professional or commercial

organizations guest speakers will go there place and deliver the lecture on their requirements and

motivate the people towards topic.

3.5.3. How to conduct a Guest Lecture?

Now a day’s the guest lectures are occupy a major place in academic, professional and commercial

organizations. In academic institutions it became necessary for academicians for their bright carrier.

Every academic institute conducting two or more guest lecturers per academic semester. Based on their

requirement first the academic institute find out well experienced person and send the official invitation

for him. If he accepts your invitation prepare the arrangements and make the program success.

3.6. Journals

3.6.1. What is a Journal?

Journal is a part of publication unit, but journal al publish only pure scientific and research articles

written by the students, researchers, scientists, academicians and professors. The articles which are

published in the journals are called as research paper. Paper published in the journal is not an easy task

for everyone.

After preparation of the research paper the author has to search for right journal in the society then as

per their requirements (it means size and font style of the title, text, main headings, sub headings,

figures, tables, etc) paper has to be modified and then submit the paper through electronic submission

or post the hard copy of the paper.

Each journal has its own Editor-in-Chief, Executive Editors, Sub Editor and an editorial board. Generally

Editor-in-Chief is also called as Managing Editor, who is full time employed and manages all

communications between the author and r reviewers. The Executive and sub editors are support the

managing editor in all aspects.

Page 38: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

32 | P a g e

An editorial board includes a number of referees (also known as reviewers) who are responsible for

reviewing and evaluating the submitted papers. Having reviewed a paper, each referee independently

advises the editor whether to accept or to reject the paper. This is usually done using a peer review form

provided by the editor. However, final decisions are made by the editor. It is common practice that

editors assign external referees to review submissions, for example when the referees of the editorial

board do not have appropriate expertise to make constructive comments on a particular paper.

The most important function of an editor (can also be a group of persons) is to make the final decision

whether to accept or to reject a submitted paper. Indeed, the comments of the referees just serve as

suggestions. Nevertheless, as the editor alone would not be able to review and comment on all

submissions in detail, he usually relies on the advice of his editorial board, where he can choose from a

pool of experts in diverse fields of the journal’s main topics. If there is consensus on acceptance or

rejection, the editor’s life is fairly easy. It becomes difficult only when there is significant disagreement

in the reviewer’s suggestions. In such a case the editor may make a final decision based on the own

opinion or after consulting additional referees.

Fig. The process of publishing a paper in a journal

Journals are generally divided in to two types; one is national journals and another is International

journals. National Journal are belongs to one nation or country, these publish articles or research papers

with in the country. International Journals are worldwide journal they can publish research papers from

all over the world.

Completion of Research

Preparation of Manuscript

Submission of Manuscript

Review of Manuscript

Revision

Decision

Rejection

Resubmission

Re-review Acceptance Publication Rejection

Page 39: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

33 | P a g e

3.7. Magazines

3.7.1. What is a Magazine?

Magazines are a mechanism for providing people with current information on a broad range of topics on

a regular basis - usually monthly, but in some cases even weekly. Simply A magazine is a periodical that

usually contains a miscellaneous collection of articles, stories, poems, and pictures and is directed at the

general reading public.

Its generally contains articles in popularized science, social, political & cultural affairs, etc and published

for a general or mass market to promote those groups' services or products.

Ex: India Today, Newsweek, Sports Illustrated etc.

Magazines are usually divided based on their themes, example sports, business, fashion, aviation,

comics, education, computers, automobiles, Entertainment etc.

For examples Science magazine, it covers news, opinions and reports about science for a non-expert

audience. Science magazines are read by non-scientists and scientists who want accessible information

on fields outside their specialization.

3.7.2. What are the types of magazines?

There are two basic types of magazines - trade or specialized magazines and consumer magazines. Trade

magazines are usually mailed to readers, whereas consumer magazines are available on the stands.

Consumer magazines cater to different groups. There are magazines exclusively targeted for children

and there are other theme magazines such as fashion, cinema, hobby, health and fitness, sports,

women's magazines, men's magazines, political magazines, news magazines and so on.

Generally magazines do not contain bibliographies and are not refereed.

Magazines and newsletters are both serials and periodicals - publications that are published on a

regular, recurring schedule for an indefinite period of time. That schedule could be weekly, monthly,

quarterly, or every other day of every other month that has more than 4 letters.

In general, the differences between newsletters and magazines come down to how they are written,

who they are written for, and how they are distributed. Additionally, most newsletters and magazines

provide visual clues as to their identity.

Magazines come in a variety of sizes from digest to tabloid size. Newsletters do as well, although letter

size is a typical newsletter format. Most magazines are significantly longer than a newsletter, from a few

dozen pages to a few hundred. Newsletters are not generally more than 12-24 pages in length and some

may be only 1-2 pages.

The most common, significant visual difference between a magazine and a newsletter is the cover.

Magazines usually have a cover that includes the name of the publication, graphics, and perhaps

headlines or teasers about what is inside that issue. Newsletters typically have the nameplate and one

or more articles right on the front, no separate cover.

Page 40: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

34 | P a g e

3.8. Newsletters

3.8.1. What is a Newsletter?

A Newsletter is generally used as a publication that gets circulated out to its subscribers after a regular

time interval. Newsletter generally belongs to a particular organization and its covers all the internal

news which is going on in an organization. In academic institutions newsletters plays major role in the

form of covering current events, admissions, achievements etc. Generally newsletters are published by

societies, Associations, Clubs, educational institutions and companies, to provide information of interest

to their students and faculty members, customers or employees.

3.8.2. What are the types of Newsletters?

Newsletters can be divided into two distinct types; one is printed on paper and another on is in digital

formats, which are usually distributed via email, it’s also called as e-Newsletter. The digital formats vary

from the simplest format, text to highly designable formats like Portable Document Format (PDF) and

HTML.

3.8.3. How to start a Newsletter?

Creating and successfully running an electronic newsletter is much easier and less costly endeavor than

trying to put together a paper version of the same newsletter. You will save the costs of copying and

postage, not to mention the supplies you would need to purchase, and the time that the project would

take to put together.

References

[1]. Yuksel, A.: Writing publishable papers. Tourism Management (In Press)

[2]. National Institute for Regional and Spatial Analysis: Questions editors are often asked.

http://www.may.ie/nirsa/geo-pub/geo-editors.html (2003)

[3]. Davis, M.: Scientific Papers and Presentations. Academic Press, San Diego (1997)

[4]. Day, R.A.: How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper. Second edn. ISI Press, Philadelphia (1983)

[5]. Dees, R.: Writing the Modern Research Paper. Second edn. Allyn & Bacon, Boston (1997)

[6]. American Psychological Association: Apa style. http://www.apastyle.org/ pubmanual.html

(2003)

About the Author:

Raju. A

Raju. A did his B-Tech in Electrical & Electronics Engineering and M-Tech in

Environmental Management from Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University

(JNTU), Hyderabad.

He is recipient of Green Environment Award and currently working as Assistant

Professor at Department of Civil Engineering, KL University, Vijayawada. He is

serving as Secretary General of Cafet-Innova Technical Society an international

non-profit organization helping the scientific community.

Page 41: How to Become a Researcher

Publishing research work is very essential for researchers in their academic pursuit.

therefore important to know the editorial policies of a particular journal before he submits his

research work. After the submission of manuscript the researcher should also be aware of

review process so that there will be transparency in the evaluat

The author should receive the feedback positively from the referee and develop the manuscript

based on the suggestions to meet the journal standards. This chapter gives the methodology

followed in general, by most of the publishers to evaluate the m

get a better idea to submit quality papers which would easily clear the review process and get

accepted for publication.

Abstracting and Indexing process which is done post

both researchers and publishers. This chapter shall discuss how a researcher can make use of

this process during his data search while preparing manuscripts and also how important is his

research work if it gets indexed.

Publishing research papers in journals

their research work. But the actual story behind the impact factor calculation is known to very

less people involved in teaching and research. This chapter shall cover all details of citations

and impact factor calculation which will be useful to researchers in choosing the publication for

their research work.

How to become a Researcher?

35 | P a g e

Publishing research work is very essential for researchers in their academic pursuit.

therefore important to know the editorial policies of a particular journal before he submits his

research work. After the submission of manuscript the researcher should also be aware of

review process so that there will be transparency in the evaluation.

The author should receive the feedback positively from the referee and develop the manuscript

based on the suggestions to meet the journal standards. This chapter gives the methodology

followed in general, by most of the publishers to evaluate the manuscripts. The researchers will

get a better idea to submit quality papers which would easily clear the review process and get

Abstracting and Indexing process which is done post-publication is also equally important for

researchers and publishers. This chapter shall discuss how a researcher can make use of

this process during his data search while preparing manuscripts and also how important is his

Publishing research papers in journals with greater impact factor adds value to researchers for

their research work. But the actual story behind the impact factor calculation is known to very

less people involved in teaching and research. This chapter shall cover all details of citations

pact factor calculation which will be useful to researchers in choosing the publication for

Publishing research work is very essential for researchers in their academic pursuit. It is

therefore important to know the editorial policies of a particular journal before he submits his

research work. After the submission of manuscript the researcher should also be aware of

The author should receive the feedback positively from the referee and develop the manuscript

based on the suggestions to meet the journal standards. This chapter gives the methodology

anuscripts. The researchers will

get a better idea to submit quality papers which would easily clear the review process and get

publication is also equally important for

researchers and publishers. This chapter shall discuss how a researcher can make use of

this process during his data search while preparing manuscripts and also how important is his

with greater impact factor adds value to researchers for

their research work. But the actual story behind the impact factor calculation is known to very

less people involved in teaching and research. This chapter shall cover all details of citations

pact factor calculation which will be useful to researchers in choosing the publication for

Page 42: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

36 | P a g e

4.1 Editorial policies and procedures:

The legislation, programs and practices that govern the publication of research work are called as

editorial policies. In simple it is a principle or rule to guide the researchers to submit their manuscripts

based on the requirements of the publishers.

The principal criteria used to evaluate contributions are:

• The contribution must present scientific findings that are original, i.e., they must not have appeared elsewhere

and must not be under consideration by any other publication.

• The contribution must be scientifically constrained, i.e., any interpretations made or conclusions drawn must

be based on the objective evaluation of scientific data.

• There must be effective separation of scientific facts and observations from interpretations and inferences.

• The article should make a contribution toward our deeper understanding of processes, broadly defined.

4.1.1 Guidelines to Authors:

Authors submitting papers for publication warrant that their papers are not currently under

consideration by any other publication and that the material contained within the work is not subject to

any other copyright, unless required consents have been obtained. All authors of articles accepted for

publication must sign a copyright form. The refereeing process is most efficient when papers are

submitted electronically in Microsoft Word. New manuscript submissions should be sent via electronic

mail directly to the Editor-in-Chief. Review papers are welcome as long as they represent original, new

syntheses. Special issues are also encouraged but terms for these must be negotiated with the Scientific

Editors.

4.1.2 Submission of Manuscripts:

The preferred method for submission of manuscripts for review is for them to be completely in an

electronic format such as Microsoft Word zipped or PDF and submitted to the Editors by e-mail. Hard

copy manuscripts also may be submitted. In the latter case, three copies of the complete manuscript

must be addressed to the Scientific Editors. All pages should carry the authors name and be properly

numbered. Authors are encouraged to include with their submissions the names and e-mail addresses of

persons they deem suitable to be referees of their manuscript. At their discretion, the Editors may use

them.

4.1.3 Preparation of Manuscripts for Review:

Manuscripts for review should be submitted double-spaced and authors are requested to consult

previous issues to see what that is. The title page should include the title of the manuscript, initials,

surname, affiliation and e-mail address of each author and corresponding address. The Abstract should

be a short summary of the paper. Avoid using deferring phrases such as “…is discussed.” and include no

references. Remember that your abstract may be the only part of your paper that is read so it should

help readers to become quickly informed about your results and to decide if your paper is relevant to

their interests. Abstracts are circulated by international retrieval systems. The text or main body of the

manuscript should be logically organized into sections but please avoid overuse of subsection

constructs. There must be a clear separation of facts and observations from interpretations and

inferences. An alphabetical and then chronological list of all references sited should follow the main

Page 43: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

37 | P a g e

text. The format of references can be obtained in any issue and the names of journals should be spelled

out in full. Papers “in preparation” and “submitted” cannot be used as references. Please make a careful

crosscheck of the reference list against citations in the text. Tables should be compiled on separate

sheets and designed to fit across a single or double column width of the journal page. Use of decimal

points, rather than commas, is required for all reported numbers. Illustrations should be legible and

contain only relevant information. Place names and other locations mentioned in the text must appear

clearly on maps. Clear instructions must be provided on how mathematical symbols and equations

should be printed. For Greek and non-Roman letters, authors must identify the symbol in words the first

time it is used. Receipt of manuscripts will be acknowledged by e-mail or by post if an e-mail address is

not provided.

4.1.4 Submission of Revised Manuscripts:

Revised manuscripts should be returned to the Editors in electronic format either on a disk or CD or as e-

mail attachments. The text should be in Word, tables in Excel and figures should be in CorelDraw or

Freehand, uncompressed TIFF or PDF format. Figures submitted in TIFF or PDF should have resolutions

of 300 dpi for colour, 600 dpi of grayscale, and 1200 dpi for black and white. Colour should be CMYK not

RGB. Figures must not be embedded in the main body of the manuscript. The cost of colour illustrations

will be charged to the authors. Authors will receive copies of their articles as high quality PDF files. No

reprints will be provided. If figures cannot be submitted in electronic format, they should be submitted

as high quality, camera-ready prints. In the covering letter, the authors must explain in detail how they

dealt with each of the referees’ comments and suggestions.

4.2 Review Process:

4.2.1 Internal Review by Editorial Committee:

The Editor-in-Chief / Executive Editor will perform an initial appraisal of submitted manuscripts which

are judged on the interest and importance of the topic, use of scientific method, clarity of presentation,

and relevance to the journal’s readers. Articles meeting the required criteria and accompanied by the

appropriate documentation are then passed to external peer review. The corresponding authors are

informed whether their paper is progressing to external review, within fifteen days of acknowledgement

of receipt.

4.2.2 External Peer Review:

The aim of the peer review process is to ensure publication of unbiased, scientifically accurate relevant

articles. All manuscripts are peer reviewed by members of the journal’s international editorial

committee and / or other specialists of equal repute before a decision on publication is made. Peer

reviewer identities are kept confidential, but author identities are known to the reviewers. Peer

reviewers are asked to disclose potential conflicts of interests that may affect their ability to provide an

unbiased review of an article.

Page 44: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

38 | P a g e

4.2.3 Clearance for Publication:

After receiving feedback from external peer review the Editor-in-Chief conducts the final checks before

giving clearance for publication. The manuscript will be published in same form in case it meets the

journal standards and positive feedback from reviewers. After making necessary changes to the

manuscript the paper shall be published, if referee recommends this in the evaluation. The letter of

Acceptance is issued to the corresponding author before the actual publication.

The copy-right form and reviewers’ evaluation form are shown below:

To,

The Editor-In-Chief,

International Journal of Earth Science and Engineering,

CAFET-INNOVA Technical Society, Hyderabad, India

Sir,

Sub: Copyright Form

I/We ________________________________________________________________ Author (s) name)

The copyright owner(s) of the Article

____________________________________________________________________ (Title of the article)

Do hereby authorize you to publish the above said article in the

“International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering published by CAFET-INNOVA Technical Society,

Hyderabad, India”

I/We further state that:

1) The Article is my/our original contribution. It does not infringe on the rights of others and does

not contain any libelous or unlawful statements.

2) Wherever required I/We have taken permission and acknowledged the source.

3) The work has been submitted only to “International Journal of Earth Science and Engineering.

CAFET-INNOVA Technical Society, Hyderabad, India”

4) That it has not been previously published or submitted elsewhere for publication.

5) I/We hereby authorize you to edit, alter, modify and make changes in the Article to make it

suitable for publication.

6) I/We hereby assign all the copyrights relating to the said Article to the CAFET-INNOVA Technical

Society, Hyderabad, India.

7) I/We have not assigned any kind of rights of the above said Article to any other

person/Publications.

(Signature)

Name of the Authors:

Page 45: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

39 | P a g e

ISSN-0974-5904 Indexed in CAS-USA-Ref No: 172238

International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering (IJEE)

EVALUATION OF PAPER –REFEREE / REVIEWER

Research/technical papers, review articles ,short communications ,notes submitted to International

Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering (IJEE) must be, original, clear, related to the subject,

complete, concise, with precise logic, and honestly appraised

Title:

Authors Name:

PAPER PROFILE

Place a check in the boxes which, in your opinion, best describe the following features of the manuscript.

Item Poor Average Good Honours

Originality of the work �

Scientific relevance �

Engineering /technological relevance �

Completeness of the work(-Field-lab) �

Organization of the manuscript �

Clarity in abstract, manuscript writing, tables,

graphs and illustrations

Acknowledgement of the work of others by

references

Item YES NO

Does the manuscript fall within the scope of the (IJEE) journal? �

Are you aware of prior publication or presentation of this work? �

In your opinion, is the technical treatment free of errors? �

Is the paper too lengthy �

Is the English grammar and punctuation good? �

Any other ( )

Recommendation check only one

Honours quality

Acceptable in the same form

Acceptable with minor modifications �

Acceptable with major revisions* (review required after revision)

NOT ACCEPTABLE*

*Justify for not accepting the paper

Page 46: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

40 | P a g e

Comments by Reviewer: Modifications in manuscript before publication/further work

I have gone through the above paper which presents the physicochemical characteristics of ore fluids

associated with the Kallur copper deposit. My general remark is that approach of this type to

understand role of fluids involved in the copper mineralization is appreciable. This paper presents the

results of specific interest. Except for the minor modification which is required for the ultimate

publication of the paper, the paper deserves publication in the journal. My other specific comments are

marked in the text, tables, and diagrams and figure itself.

The paper may be accepted for publication once the changes are incorporated.

Date:

Name of the reviewer / Referee:

Email:

NOTE: (name will be deleted-before sending –authors)

4.3 Abstracting and Indexing Process:

This is a post-publication process done by various Abstracting and Indexing service organizations in

order to avoid researchers, to manually search the journal articles of their interest by looking through

various physical journals or consulting literature overviews. Since most of the journals are published

electronically, the data can be searched through internet hence minimizing the time of the researcher in

acquiring related data to his research. At the same time being represented in an Abstracting and

Indexing services is an essential factor for the success of journal publishers.

The abstracting and indexing are practical arts and have two general purposes i.e. minimizing the time &

effort and maximizing the searching success. The function of an index is to give users systematic and

effective shortcuts to the information they need.

Some of the most important and few abstracting and indexing organizations that cover all disciplines are

Google Scholar and Thomson Reuters ISI Web of knowledge. While the well known discipline specific

indexing service include PubMed/Medline (in the field of medicine), ChemAbstracts (chemistry), ADS

(astronomy & physics), Zentralblatt für Mathematik (mathematics), among many others.

4.4 Citation:

A citation is an enumeration that quotes a reference to a precedent by acknowledging the relevance of

other’s works. It represents the conceptual association of scientific ideas where the authors of a

research paper make explicit linkages between their current research and prior work.

However there is a difference in terminology between “citation” and “reference”. The reference is

generally included in the current paper acknowledging the previous work. Also that particular previous

work now will have a citation in the current paper, which will be recorded.

Similarly there is a variation in the words “cited” and “citing”. The cited work is a paper that has been

mentioned in the references of other works, while the citing work is the one that contains the

references.

Page 47: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

41 | P a g e

The basic citation data gives the number of articles published during that year and the number of times

the articles in the journal were cited during the year by later articles in itself and other journals.

It also gives detailed tables showing:

• The number of times the articles in the journal were cited during the year by later articles in

itself and other journals.

• The number of citations made from articles published in the journal that year to it and other

specific individual journals during each of the most recent ten years.

• The number of times articles published in the journal during each of the most recent ten years

were cited by individual specific journals during the year

4.4.1 Advantages of Citation:

The citation-based method of algorithmic subject indexing includes title words, author-supplied

keywords, and abstract words which are algorithmically processed to identify the most-commonly

recurring words and phrases.

The following are some of the advantages of citations:

• Calculation of Impact factor

• Duplication of research work can be avoided

• Time, effort and funds can be well managed

• Scientists need not stress on literature searching

4.5 Impact Factor:

The Impact Factor (IF) is a measure of the frequency with which the “average article” in a journal has

been cited in a particular year or period. In a given year, the impact factor of a journal is the average

number of citations received per paper published in that journal during the two preceding years.

However this is not a measure for the quality of research work done in a particular paper.

4.5.1a Calculation for Journal Impact Factor:

The Journal Impact Factor is calculated by dividing the number of current year citations to the source

items published in that journal during the previous two years.

If A represents total number of cites in a current year, B represents the number of cites to articles

published in previous two years, and C represents the number of articles published in previous two

years, then the Impact Factor is given by the ratio of B to C.

Page 48: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

42 | P a g e

Example:

A = total cites in 2007

B = 2007 cites to articles published in 2005-2006 (this is a subset of A)

C = number of articles published in 2005-2006

D = B/C = 2007 Impact Factor

However the impact factor for the year 2007 will be published in 2008

Important Note: New journals, which are indexed from their first published issue, will receive an impact

factor after two years of indexing; in this case, the citations to the year prior to Volume 1, and the

number of articles published in the year prior to Volume 1 are known zero values. Journals that are

indexed starting with a volume other than the first volume will not get an impact factor until they have

been indexed for three years.

4.5.1b Calculation for five-year impact factor:

An alternative five-year impact can be calculated based on adding citations in 2003-2007 articles

published in the same five-year period. And yet another is possible by selecting one or two earlier years

as factor “B”.

A = citations in 2007 to articles published in 2002-2006

B = articles published in 2002-2006

C = A/B = five-year impact factor

4.5.1c Calculation for impact factor revised to exclude self-citations

A = citations in 2007 to articles published in 2005-2006

B = 2007 self-citations to articles published in 2005-2006

C = A - B = total citations minus self-citations to recent articles

D = number of articles published 2005-2006

E = revised impact factor (C/D)

4.5.1d Unified 2007 impact factor calculation for title change

A = 1992 citations to articles published in 2005-2006 (a1 + a2)

A1 = those for new title

A2 = those for superseded title

B = number of articles published in 2005-2006 (B1 + B2)

B1 = those for new title

B2 = those for superseded title

C = unified impact factor (A/B)

C1 = A1/B1 = Impact factor for the new title

C2 = A2/B2 = Impact factor for the superseded title

Page 49: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

43 | P a g e

4.5.2 Uses of Impact Factor:

The most important use of Impact Factor is in the process of academic evaluation. The following are

some of the other uses:

• Used to provide a gross approximation of the prestige of journals in which individuals have been

published

• Useful in clarifying the significance of total citation frequencies.

• Eliminates some of the bias of such counts which favor large journals over small ones, or

frequently issued journals over less frequently issued ones, and of older journals over newer

ones.

4.5.3 Applications of Impact Factor:

There are many applications of Impact Factor including market research for publishers which provides

quantitative evidence for editors to position their journals in relation to the competition.

References:

[1] Price D. J. D. Little science, big science...and beyond. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986.

301 p.

[2] Small H. G. Cited documents as concept symbols. Soc. Stud. Sci. 8:327-40, 1978.

[3] Merton R. K. Foreword. (Garfield E) Citation indexing—its theory and application in science,

technology, and the humanities. Philadelphia: ISI Press®, 1983. p. vi.

[4] Kochen M. How do we acknowledge intellectual debts? J. Doc. 43:54-64, 1987.

[5] Urey H. C. Lifelike forms in meteorites. Science 137:623-8, 1962.

[6] Selye H. General adaptation syndrome. J. Clin. Endocrinol. 6:117-230, 1946.

[7] Gray W. A. & Harley A. J. Computer assisted indexing. Inform. Storage Retrieval 7:167-74, 1971.

[8] Garfield E. & Sher I. H. KeyWords Plus—algorithmic derivative indexing. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci.

44:298-9, 1993.

[9] Martyn J. Unwitting duplication of research. New Sci. 21:338, 1964.Gross P L K, Gross E M.

College libraries and chemical education. Science 66:385-9, 1927.

[10] Brodman E. Methods of choosing physiology journals. Bull. Med. Libr. Assn. 32:479-83, 1944.

[11] Garfield E. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science 178:471-9, 1972.

[12] Citation indexing for studying science. Nature 227:669-71, 1970.

[13] Which medical journals have the greatest impact? Ann. Intern. Med. 105:313-20, 1986

[14] http://ccp.wkpharma.com/pdfs/CCPolicy.PDF 2010 Wolters Kluwer

Page 50: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

44 | P a g e

About the Authors:

Hafeez Basha. R

Hafeez Basha. R did his B-Tech in Electrical and Electronics Engineering from

Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, JNTU Hyderabad and M-Tech in

Computer Science Engineering from Acharya Nagarjuna University, Guntur.

He is recipient of Young Scientist Award and was earlier Research Engineer

Trainee at Pentagram Research Centre. He is currently working as Research

Analyst with the scientific division of Thomson Reuters, worlds’ leading

Information company that accelerates research, scientific discovery and

innovation globally.

He served as Advisory / Technical member in various expert committees and

even organized International Conferences and Technical Symposiums. He is

also Managing Editor for International Journals published by Cafet-Innova

Technical Society an international non-profit organization helping the

scientific community.

D. Venkat Reddy

Professor D. Venkat Reddy did his M.Sc (Geology) and M.Sc (Tech)

Hydrogeology from Osmania University, Hyderabad. He obtained his Ph. D in

Geology from the same University and currently working as Professor in

Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology (NIT),

Karnataka.

He is serving as President of Cafet-Innova Technical Society and Editor-in-

Chief for International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering. He is also

Associate Editor for Dream Earth publication, Journal Pradushan Nirmulan

and Drilling world along with expert in the field of geology in allexperts.com

He is member of International Gondwana Research Association (Japan),

Geological Society of India, Indian Geological Congress, Mineralogical Society

of India, and Indian Society of Technical Education.

Page 51: How to Become a Researcher

If we knew what it was we were

Introduction The way in which research is conducted may be conceived of in terms of the research philosophy

subscribed to, the research strategy employed and so the research instruments utilized (and perhaps

developed) in the pursuit of a goal

problem i.e., the research question.

used in a technical sense. According to Clifford Woody research comprises defining and redefining

problems, formulating hypothesis

making deductions and reaching conclusions; and at last carefully testing the conclusions to determine

whether they fit the formulating hypothesis. D. Slesinger and M. Ste

Social Sciences define research as “the manipulation of things, concepts or symbols for the purpose of

generalizing to extend, correct or verify knowledge, whether that knowledge aids in construction of

theory or in the practice of an art.”Research is, thus, an original contribution to the existing stock of

knowledge making for its advancement. It is the

comparison and experiment. In short, the search for knowledge through

method of finding solution to a problem is research. The systematic approach concerning generalization

and the formulation of a theory is also research. As such the term ‘research’ refers to the systematic

method consisting of enunciating

analyzing the facts and reaching certain conclusions either in the form of solutions(s) towards the

concerned problem or in certain generalizations

How to become a Researcher?

45 | P a g e

If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called research, would it??

- Albert Einstein (1879

The way in which research is conducted may be conceived of in terms of the research philosophy

subscribed to, the research strategy employed and so the research instruments utilized (and perhaps

developed) in the pursuit of a goal - the research objective(s) - and the quest for the solution of a

problem i.e., the research question. Research is an academic activity and as such the term should be

used in a technical sense. According to Clifford Woody research comprises defining and redefining

ating hypothesis or suggested solutions; collecting, organizing and evaluating data;

making deductions and reaching conclusions; and at last carefully testing the conclusions to determine

whether they fit the formulating hypothesis. D. Slesinger and M. Stephenson in the Encyclopedia of

Social Sciences define research as “the manipulation of things, concepts or symbols for the purpose of

generalizing to extend, correct or verify knowledge, whether that knowledge aids in construction of

ice of an art.”Research is, thus, an original contribution to the existing stock of

knowledge making for its advancement. It is the pursuit of truth with the help of study, observation,

comparison and experiment. In short, the search for knowledge through objective and systematic

method of finding solution to a problem is research. The systematic approach concerning generalization

and the formulation of a theory is also research. As such the term ‘research’ refers to the systematic

ciating the problem, formulating a hypothesis, collecting the facts or data,

analyzing the facts and reaching certain conclusions either in the form of solutions(s) towards the

generalizations for some theoretical formulation.

doing, it would not be called research, would it??

Albert Einstein (1879-1955)

The way in which research is conducted may be conceived of in terms of the research philosophy

subscribed to, the research strategy employed and so the research instruments utilized (and perhaps

and the quest for the solution of a

Research is an academic activity and as such the term should be

used in a technical sense. According to Clifford Woody research comprises defining and redefining

solutions; collecting, organizing and evaluating data;

making deductions and reaching conclusions; and at last carefully testing the conclusions to determine

phenson in the Encyclopedia of

Social Sciences define research as “the manipulation of things, concepts or symbols for the purpose of

generalizing to extend, correct or verify knowledge, whether that knowledge aids in construction of

ice of an art.”Research is, thus, an original contribution to the existing stock of

of truth with the help of study, observation,

objective and systematic

method of finding solution to a problem is research. The systematic approach concerning generalization

and the formulation of a theory is also research. As such the term ‘research’ refers to the systematic

, formulating a hypothesis, collecting the facts or data,

analyzing the facts and reaching certain conclusions either in the form of solutions(s) towards the

Page 52: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

46 | P a g e

5.1 Research Philosophy A research philosophy is a belief about the way in which data about a phenomenon should be gathered,

analysed and used. The term epistemology (what is known to be true) as opposed to doxology (what is

believed to be true) encompasses the various philosophies of research approach. The purpose of

science, then, is the process of transforming things believed into things known: doxa to episteme. Two

major research philosophies have been identified in the Western tradition of science, namely positivist

(sometimes called scientific) and interpretivist (also known as antipositivist) (Galliers, 1991).

5.1.1 Positivism Positivists believe that reality is stable and can be observed and described from an objective viewpoint

(Levin, 1988), i.e. without interfering with the phenomena being studied. They contend that phenomena

should be isolated and that observations should be repeatable. This often involves manipulation of

reality with variations in only a single independent variable so as to identify regularities in, and to form

relationships between, some of the constituent elements of the social world. Predictions can be made

on the basis of the previously observed and explained realities and their inter-relationships. "Positivism

has a long and rich historical tradition. It is so embedded in our society that knowledge claims not

grounded in positivist thought are simply dismissed as ascientific and therefore invalid" (Hirschheim,

1985, p.33). This view is indirectly supported by Alavi and Carlson (1992) who, in a review of 902 IS

research articles, found that all the empirical studies were positivist in approach. Positivism has also had

a particularly successful association with the physical and natural sciences. There has, however, been

much debate on the issue of whether or not this positivist paradigm is entirely suitable for the social

sciences (Hirschheim, 1985), many authors calling for a more pluralistic attitude towards research

methodologies (Kuhn, 1970; Bjørn-Andersen, 1985; Remenyi and Williams, 1996). Indeed, some of the

difficulties experienced in research, such as the apparent inconsistency of results, may be attributed to

the inappropriateness of the positivist paradigm for the domain. Likewise, some variables or constituent

parts of reality might have been previously thought un-measurable under the positivist paradigm and

hence went unresearched (after Galliers, 1991).

5.1.2 Interpretivism Interpretivists contend that only through the subjective interpretation of and intervention in reality can

that reality be fully understood. The study of phenomena in their natural environment is key to the

interpretivist philosophy, together with the acknowledgement that scientists cannot avoid affecting

those phenomena they study. They admit that there may be many interpretations of reality, but

maintain that these interpretations are in themselves a part of the scientific knowledge they are

pursuing. Interpretivism has a tradition that is no less glorious than that of positivism, nor is it shorter.

5.1.3 Research Strategy A large number of research methodologies have been identified, Galliers (1991) for example listing

fourteen, while Alavi and Carlson (1992), use a hierarchical taxonomy with three levels and eighteen

categories. In Table 1 below, listed the methodologies identified by Galliers (1991, p.149), indicating

whether they typically conform to the positivist or interpretivist paradigms. Before introducing the

methodologies we use in this research, we summarise the key features of the key methodologies in the

table, identifying their respective strengths and weaknesses. In the following sections, we justify our

choice of methodologies and explain how they both operate and interoperate in our research.

Page 53: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

47 | P a g e

Laboratory experiments permit the researcher to identify precise relationships between a small number

of variables that are studied intensively via a designed laboratory situation using quantitative analytical

techniques with a view to making generalisable statements applicable to real-life situations. The key

weakness of laboratory experiments is the "limited extent to which identified relationships exist in the

real world due to oversimplification of the experimental situation and the isolation of such situations

from most of the variables that are found in the real world"(Galliers, 1991, p.150).

Field experiments extend laboratory experiments into real organisations and their real life situations,

thereby achieving greater realism and diminishing the extent to which situations can be criticised as

contrived. In practice it is difficult to identify organisations that are prepared to be experimented on and

still more difficult to achieve sufficient control to make replication viable.

Table 1 - Taxonomy of Research Methodologies

Scientific/Positivist Interpretivist/Anti-positivist

Laboratory Experiments Subjective/Argumentative

Field Experiments Reviews

Surveys Action Research

Case Studies Case Studies

Theorem Proof Descriptive/Interpretive

Forecasting Futures Research

Simulation Role/Game Playing

Surveys enable the researcher to obtain data about practices, situations or views at one point in time

through questionnaires or interviews. Quantitative analytical techniques are then used to draw

inferences from this data regarding existing relationships. The use of surveys permit a researcher to

study more variables at one time than is typically possible in laboratory or field experiments, whilst data

can be collected about real world environments. A key weakness is that it is very difficult to realise

insights relating to the causes of or processes involved in the phenomena measured. There are, in

addition, several sources of bias such as the possibly self-selecting nature of respondents, the point in

time when the survey is conducted and in the researcher him/herself through the design of the survey

itself.

Case studies involve an attempt to describe relationships that exist in reality, very often in a single

organisation. Case studies may be positivist or interpretivist in nature, depending on the approach of the

researcher, the data collected and the analytical techniques employed. Reality can be captured in

greater detail by an observer-researcher, with the analysis of more variables than is typically possible in

experimental and survey research. Case studies can be considered weak as they are typically restricted

to a single organisation and it is difficult to generalise findings since it is hard to find similar cases with

similar data that can be analysed in a statistically meaningful way. Furthermore, different researchers

may have different interpretations of the same data, thus adding research bias into the equation.

Simulation involves copying the behaviour of a system. Simulation is used in situations where it would

be difficult normally to solve problems analytically and typically involves the introduction of random

variables. As with experimental forms of research, it is difficult to make a simulation sufficiently realistic

so that it resembles real world events. Forecasting/futures research involves the use of techniques such

as regression analysis and time series analysis to make predictions about likely future events. It is a

useful form of research in that it attempts to cope with the rapid changes that are taking place in IT and

predict the impacts of these changes on individuals, organisations or society. However, it is a method

that is fraught with difficulties relating to the complexity of real world events, the arbitrary nature of

future changes and the lack of knowledge about the future. Researchers cannot build true visions of the

future, but only scenarios of possible futures and so impacts under these possible conditions.

Page 54: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

48 | P a g e

Subjective/argumentative research, for example hermeneutics and phenomenology) requires the

researcher to adopt a creative or speculative stance rather than act as an observer. It is a useful

technique since new theories can be built, new ideas generated and subsequently tested. However, as

an unstructured and subjective form of research, there is a strong chance of researcher bias.

Action research is a form of applied research where the researcher attempts to develop results or a

solution that is of practical value to the people with whom the research is working, and at the same time

developing theoretical knowledge. Through direct intervention in problems, the researcher aims to

create practical, often emancipatory, outcomes while also aiming to reinform existing theory in the

domain studied. As with case studies, action research is usually restricted to a single organization

making it difficult to generalize findings, while different researchers may interpret events differently.

The personal ethics of the researcher are critical, since the opportunity for direct researcher

intervention is always present.

5.2 Objectives of Research The purpose of research is to discover answers to questions through the application of scientific

procedures. The main aim of research is to find out the truth which is hidden and which has not been

discovered as yet. Though each research study has its own specific purpose, we may think of research

objectives as falling into a number of following broad groupings:

1. To gain familiarity with a phenomenon or to achieve new insights into it (studies with this object

in view are termed as exploratory or formulative research studies);

2. To portray accurately the characteristics of a particular individual, situation or a group (studies

with this object in view are known as descriptive research studies);

3. To determine the frequency with which something occurs or with which it is associated with

something else (studies with this object in view are known as diagnostic research studies);

4. To test a hypothesis of a causal relationship between variables (such studies are known as

hypothesis-testing research studies).

5.3 Motivation in Research What makes people to undertake research? This is a question of fundamental importance. The possible

motives for doing research may be either one or more of the following:

1. Desire to get a research degree along with its consequential benefits;

2. Desire to face the challenge in solving the unsolved problems, i.e., concern over practical

problems initiates research;

3. Desire to get intellectual joy of doing some creative work;

4. Desire to be of service to society;

5. Desire to get respectability.

However, this is not an exhaustive list of factors motivating people to undertake research studies.

Many more factors such as directives of government, employment conditions, curiosity about new

things, desire to understand causal relationships, social thinking and awakening, and the like may as well

motivate (or at times compel) people to perform research operations.

Page 55: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

49 | P a g e

5.4 Types of Research The basic types of research are as follows:

(i) Descriptive vs. Analytical: Descriptive research includes surveys and fact-finding enquiries of

different kinds. The major purpose of descriptive research is description of the state of affairs as it

exists at present. In social science and business research we quite often use the term Ex post facto

research for descriptive research studies. The main characteristic of this method is that the

researcher has no control over the variables; he can only report what has happened or what is

happening. Most ex post facto research projects are used for descriptive studies in which the

researcher seeks to measure such items as, for example, frequency of shopping, preferences of

people, or similar data. Ex post facto studies also include attempts by researchers to discover

causes even when they cannot control the variables. The methods of research utilized in

descriptive research are survey methods of all kinds, including comparative and correlational

methods. In analytical research, on the other hand, the researcher has to use facts or information

already available, and analyze these to make a critical evaluation of the material.

(ii) Applied vs. Fundamental: Research can either be applied (or action) research or fundamental (to

basic or pure) research. Applied research aims at finding a solution for an immediate problem

facing a society or an industrial/business organization, whereas fundamental research is mainly

concerned with generalizations and with the formulation of a theory. “Gathering knowledge for

knowledge’s sake is termed ‘pure’ or ‘basic’ research.” Research concerning some natural

phenomenon or relating to pure mathematics are examples of fundamental research. Similarly,

research studies, concerning human behavior carried on with a view to make generalizations about

human behavior, are also examples of fundamental research, but research aimed at certain

conclusions (say, a solution) facing a concrete social or business problem is an example of applied

research. Research to identify social, economic or political trends that may affect a particular

institution or the copy research (research to find out whether certain communications will be read

and understood) or the marketing research or evaluation research are examples of applied

research. Thus, the central aim of applied research is to discover a solution for some pressing

practical problem, whereas basic research is directed towards finding information that has a broad

base of applications and thus, adds to the already existing organized body of scientific knowledge.

(iii) Quantitative vs. Qualitative: Quantitative research is based on the measurement of quantity or

amount. It is applicable to phenomena that can be expressed in terms of quantity. Qualitative

research, on the other hand, is concerned with qualitative phenomenon, i.e., phenomena relating

to or involving quality or kind. For instance, when we are interested in investigating the reasons for

human behavior (i.e., why people think or do certain things), we quite often talk of ‘Motivation

Research’, an important type of qualitative research. This type of research aims at discovering the

underlying motives and desires, using in depth interviews for the purpose. Other techniques of

such research are word association tests, sentence completion tests, story completion tests and

similar other projective techniques. Attitude or opinion research i.e., research designed to find out

how people feel or what they think about a particular subject or institution is also qualitative

research. Qualitative research is especially important in the behavioral sciences where the aim is to

discover the underlying motives of human behavior. Through such research we can analyze the

various factors which motivate people to behave in a particular manner or which make people like

or dislike a particular thing. It may be stated, however, that to apply qualitative research in practice

is relatively a difficult job and therefore, while doing such research, one should seek guidance from

experimental psychologists.

Page 56: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

50 | P a g e

(iv) Conceptual vs. Empirical: Conceptual research is that related to some abstract idea(s) or theory. It

is generally used by philosophers and thinkers to develop new concepts or to reinterpret existing

ones. On the other hand, empirical research relies on experience or observation alone, often

without due regard for system and theory. It is data-based research, coming up with conclusions

which are capable of being verified by observation or experiment. We can also call it as

experimental type of research. In such a research it is necessary to get at facts firsthand, at their

source, and actively to go about doing certain things to stimulate the production of desired

information. In such a research, the researcher must first provide himself with a working

hypothesis or guess as to the probable results. He then works to get enough facts (data) to prove or

disprove his hypothesis. He then sets up experimental designs which he thinks will manipulate the

persons or the materials concerned so as to bring forth the desired information. Such research is

thus characterized by the experimenter’s control over the variables under study and his deliberate

manipulation of one of them to study its effects. Empirical research is appropriate when proof is

sought that certain variables affect other variables in some way. Evidence gathered through

experiments or empirical studies is today considered to be the most powerful support possible for

a given hypothesis.

(v) Some Other Types of Research: All other types of research are variations of one or more of the

above stated approaches, based on either the purpose of research, or the time required to

accomplish research, on the environment in which research is done, or on the basis of some other

similar factor. Form the point of view of time, we can think of research either as one-time research or

longitudinal research. In the former case the research is confined to a single time-period, whereas in

the latter case the research is carried on over several time-periods. Research can be field-setting

research or laboratory research or simulation research, depending upon the environment in which it

is to be carried out. Research can as well be understood as clinical or diagnostic research. Such

research follow case-study methods or in depth approaches to reach the basic causal relations. Such

studies usually go deep into the causes of things or events that interest us, using very small samples

and very deep probing data gathering devices. The research may be exploratory or it may be

formalized. The objective of exploratory research is the development of hypotheses rather than their

testing, whereas formalized research studies are those with substantial structure and with specific

hypotheses to be tested. Historical research is that which utilizes historical sources like documents,

remains, etc. to study events or ideas of the past, including the philosophy of persons and groups at

any remote point of time. Research can also be classified as conclusion-oriented and decision-

oriented. While doing conclusion oriented research, a researcher is free to pick up a problem,

redesign the enquiry as he proceeds and is prepared to conceptualize as he wishes. Decision-oriented

research is always for the need of a decision maker and the researcher in this case is not free to

embark upon research according to his own inclination. Operations research is an example of

decision oriented research since it is a scientific method of providing executive departments with a

quantitative basis for decisions regarding operations under their control. The above description of

the types of research brings to light the fact that there are two basic approaches to research, viz.,

quantitative approach and the qualitative approach. The former involves the generation of data in

quantitative form which can be subjected to rigorous quantitative analysis in a formal and rigid

fashion. This approach can be further sub-classified into inferential, experimental and simulation

approaches to research. The purpose of inferential approach to research is to form a data base from

which to infer characteristics or relationships of population. This usually means survey research

where a sample of population is studied (questioned or observed) to determine its characteristics,

and it is then inferred that the population has the same characteristics. Experimental approach is

characterized by much greater control over the research environment and in this case some variables

Page 57: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

51 | P a g e

are manipulated to observe their effect on other variables. Simulation approach involves the

construction of an artificial environment within which relevant information and data can be

generated. This permits an observation of the dynamic behavior of a system (or its sub-system) under

controlled conditions. The term ‘simulation’ in the context of business and social sciences

applications refers to “the operation of a numerical model that represents the structure of a dynamic

process. Given the values of initial conditions, parameters and exogenous variables, a simulation is

run to represent the behavior of the process over time.” Simulation approach can also be useful in

building models for understanding future conditions.

Qualitative approach to research is concerned with subjective assessment of attitudes, opinions and

behavior. Research in such a situation is a function of researcher’s insights and impressions. Such an

approach to research generates results either in non-quantitative form or in the form which are not

subjected to rigorous quantitative analysis. Generally, the techniques of focus group interviews,

projective techniques and depth interviews are used. All these are explained at length in chapters

that follow.

5.5 Importance of Knowing How Research is done The study of research methodology gives the student the necessary training in gathering material and

arranging or card-indexing them, participation in the field work when required, and also training in

techniques for the collection of data appropriate to particular problems, in the use of statistics,

questionnaires and controlled experimentation and in recording evidence, sorting it out and interpreting

it. In fact, importance of knowing the methodology of research or how research is done stems from the

following considerations:

(i) For one who is preparing himself for a career of carrying out research, the importance of knowing

research methodology and research techniques is obvious since the same constitute the tools of

his trade. The knowledge of methodology provides good training especially to the new research

worker and enables him to do better research. It helps him to develop disciplined thinking or a

‘bent of mind’ to observe the field objectively. Hence, those aspiring for careerism in research

must develop the skill of using research techniques and must thoroughly understand the logic

behind them.

(ii) Knowledge of how to do research will inculcate the ability to evaluate and use research results

with reasonable confidence. In other words, we can state that the knowledge of research

methodology is helpful in various fields such as government or business administration,

community development and social work where persons are increasingly called upon to evaluate

and use research results for action.

(iii) When one knows how research is done, then one may have the satisfaction of acquiring a new

intellectual tool which can become a way of looking at the world and of judging every day

experience. Accordingly, it enables use to make intelligent decisions concerning problems facing

us in practical life at different points of time. Thus, the knowledge of research methodology

provides tools to took at things in life objectively.

(iv) In this scientific age, all of us are in many ways consumers of research results and we can use

them intelligently provided we are able to judge the adequacy of the methods by which they

have been obtained. The knowledge of methodology helps the consumer of research results to

evaluate them and enables him to take rational decisions.

Page 58: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

52 | P a g e

5.6 Criteria of Good Research Whatever may be the types of research works and studies, one thing that is important is that they all

meet on the common ground of scientific method employed by them. One expects scientific research to

satisfy the following criteria:

1. The purpose of the research should be clearly defined and common concepts be used.

2. The research procedure used should be described in sufficient detail to permit another

researcher to repeat the research for further advancement, keeping the continuity of what has

already been attained.

3. The procedural design of the research should be carefully planned to yield results that are as

objective as possible.

4. The researcher should report with complete frankness, flaws in procedural design and estimate

their effects upon the findings.

5. The analysis of data should be sufficiently adequate to reveal its significance and the methods of

analysis used should be appropriate. The validity and reliability of the data should be checked

carefully.

6. Conclusions should be confined to those justified by the data of the research and limited to

those for which the data provide an adequate basis.

7. Greater confidence in research is warranted if the researcher is experienced, has a good

reputation in research and is a person of integrity.

In other words, we can state the qualities of a good research as under:

1. Good research is systematic: It means that research is structured with specified steps to be taken in

a specified sequence in accordance with the well defined set of rules. Systematic characteristic of

the research does not rule out creative thinking but it certainly does reject the use of guessing and

intuition in arriving at conclusions.

2. Good research is logical: This implies that research is guided by the rules of logical reasoning and

the logical process of induction and deduction are of great value in carrying out research. Induction

is the process of reasoning from a part to the whole whereas deduction is the process of reasoning

from some premise to a conclusion which follows from that very premise. In fact, logical reasoning

makes research more meaningful in the context of decision making.

3. Good research is empirical: It implies that research is related basically to one or more aspects of a

real situation and deals with concrete data that provides a basis for external validity to research

results.

4. Good research is replicable: This characteristic allows research results to be verified by replicating

the study and thereby building a sound basis for decisions.

About the Author:

Dr. D. Neelima Satyam

Dr. D. Neelima Satyamr did her B-Tech in Civil Engineering from Sri Venkateshwara

University, Tirupathi and M-Tech from IIT-Delhi, in Geo-technical Engineering. She

obtained her Ph. D from IIT-Delhi. She was earlier Associate Professor at VNR

Vignana Jyothi College of Engineering and currently Assistant Professor at

International Institute of Information Technology (IIIT-Hyderabad). She is also

Visiting faculty at National Academy of construction and associated with professional

bodies like Indian Concrete Institute, Indian Geotechnical society, Indian Society of

Earthquake Technology, Institution of Engineers (India), American Society of Civil

Engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, International Society for Soil

Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering

Page 59: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

53 | P a g e

Intellectual Property (IP) is a buzz word that you as a young researcher should expect to know more.

Most of us have heard words like patent, copyrights, trademarks, trade names, service marks, industrial

designs, undisclosed indications, geographical indications, etc... But do we really know what they are?

Well, if your interest is towards knowing them, then you have the right book in your hand. This section

of this book will address your needs. Happy reading!

We have organized the contents into two big chunks: Intellectual Property Overview; Patents. All though

patents are a part of intellectual property, keeping in mind the extensive information that you guys

would be interested in, we choose to take Patents as a division. This division is again sliced into five

modules: Patents; How to Get a Patent; Patenting Abroad; Commercializing Patented Technology;

Enforcing Patents.

6.1 Intell ectual Property Overview

Day in and day out, we encounter intellectual property in one form or the other. In IP, ownership is the

word which defines the property. Ownership is the power to possess, use to our advantage, sell or

transfer an object and the power of excluding others. In other words, property is a set of rights

conferred on a person by law. IP is an intangible property created by our mind, and our thoughts give

the value to the property.

In simple words, the ideas or thoughts that one owns is a form of property. Hence, it’s imperative to

protect ones property and cash it. You might have a question, what if someone uses my idea or

technology (infringement) or how do I protect my ideas or work or what can I protect and what cannot.

To understand more, let’s drill in and see the types of IP.

Page 60: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

54 | P a g e

6.1.1 Major types of IP

Although there are several ways to protect ones IP and the following are a few basic ones:

• Patent

• Copyright and related rights

• Trademarks, Trade names and Service Marks

• Industrial Designs

• Undisclosed Indications

• Geographical Indications

• Layout Designs of IC

Copyright is granted to original artistic, musical, audio, usual, literary works, which are created by

artists. The rights include rights of reproduction, communication to the public, adaptation and

translation of work. Copyright protection applies to a wide range of works, including computer

programs. These are usually indicated by symbol: ©

Trademarks and Service marks are distinctive symbols, signs, logos that help the consumer to

distinguish between competitor goods or services and are a major part of the good will the company

enjoys in the trade. A Trade name is the name of an enterprise which catches the attention of the

public. They are Indicators of good quality. There are no quality standards for trade mark. Trademarks

are usually indentified by the symbol: ™ e.g. ABC™

A Geographical indication is a sign used on goods that have a specific geographical origin and posses the

specialties of the particular region. These goods have an advantage over other goods in the race. This IP

is having great commercial significance.

An Industrial design is the aesthetic design for an article. It can have shape and surface, color, and they

improve the aesthetic appearance of the product.

A patent is a statutory right granted for a limited period (usually 20 years) to an inventor in respect of an

invention to exclude any other person from manufacturing, using or selling the patented product or

from using the patented process, without the consent of the owner.

Layout design of IC is a relatively new area in IP which has appeared with electronics field making

advances. The design of circuitry of a chip requires great investment of knowledge. You may be able to

obtain protection for an original layout design (or topography) of an integrated circuit used in

microchips and semiconductor chips. Such protection may extend also to the final product incorporating

the layout design. Protection of a layout design is not a monopoly right.

Page 61: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

55 | P a g e

New plant varieties. In many countries, a breeder of a new plant variety, which fulfils the requirements

of novelty, distinctness, uniformity and stability, and is designated with a suitable denomination may

obtain protection in the form of “plant breeder's rights.” For more information on the protection of new

plant varieties, see: www.upov.int

6.2 Patents

6.2.1 What is a patent?

A patent is an exclusive right granted by the State for an invention that is new, involves an inventive step

and is capable of industrial application. It gives its owner the exclusive right to prevent or stop others

from making, using, offering for sale, selling or importing a product or a process, based on the patented

invention, without the owner’s prior permission. A patent is a powerful business tool for companies to

gain exclusivity over a new product or process, develop a strong market position and earn additional

revenues through licensing.

A complex product (such as a camera, mobile phone, or a car) may incorporate a number of inventions

that are covered by several patents, which may be owned by different patent holders.

A patent is granted by the national patent office of a country or a regional patent office for a group of

countries. It is valid for a limited period of time, generally for 20 years from the date of filing of the

patent application, provided the required maintenance fees are paid on time. A patent is a territorial

right, limited to the geographical boundary of the relevant country or region.

In return for the exclusive right provided by a patent, the applicant is required to disclose the invention

to the public by providing a detailed, accurate and complete written description of the invention in the

patent application. The granted patent and, in many countries, the patent application is made public via

publication in an official journal or gazette.

What is an invention?

In patent jargon, an invention is generally defined as a new and inventive solution to a technical

problem. It may relate to the creation of an entirely new device, product, method or process, or may

simply be an incremental improvement to a known product or process. Merely finding something that

already exists in nature generally does not qualify as an invention; an adequate amount of human

ingenuity, creativity and inventiveness must be involved.

While most inventions nowadays are the result of considerable efforts and long-term investments in

Research and Development (R&D), many simple and inexpensive technical improvements, of great

market value, have yielded significant income and profits to their inventors or companies.

Page 62: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

56 | P a g e

Invention refers to a technical solution to a technical problem. It may be an innovative idea or may be in

the form of a working model or prototype. Innovation refers to the translation of the invention into a

marketable product or process.

Why should you consider patenting your inventions?

Short product cycles and increasing competition put enormous pressure on enterprises to become

innovative and/or obtain access to other companies’ innovations, so as to become and remain

competitive in domestic and export markets.

The exclusive rights provided by a patent may be crucial for innovative companies to prosper in a

challenging, risky and dynamic business climate. Key reasons for patenting inventions include:

Strong market position and competitive advantage: A patent gives its owner the exclusive right to

prevent or stop others from commercially using the patented invention, thereby reducing uncertainty,

risk and competition from free riders and imitators. If your company owns or obtains the permission to

exploit a valuable patented invention it may be able to create a market entry barrier for competitors in

respect of the same inventions. This will help it to become a pre-eminent player in the relevant

market(s).

Higher profit or returns on investment. If your company has invested a significant amount of time and

money in R&D, patent protection of the resulting inventions would help in recovering costs and

obtaining higher returns on investments.

Additional income from licensing or assigning the patent: As a patent owner you may license your

rights over the invention to others in exchange for lump sum payments and/or royalties, in order to

generate additional income for the company. Selling (or assigning) a patent implies transfer of

ownership, whereas licensing implies only permission to use the licensed invention under specified

conditions.

Access to technology through cross-licensing: If your company is interested in technology owned by

others you may use your company’s own patents to negotiate cross-licensing agreements, by which your

company and the other party agree to authorize each other to use one or more of your respective

patents under conditions specified in the agreement.

Access to new markets: Licensing of patents (or even pending patent applications) to others may

provide access to new markets, which are otherwise inaccessible. In order to do so, the invention must

also be protected in the relevant foreign market(s).

Diminished risks of infringement: By obtaining patent protection you will be able to prevent others

from patenting the same invention and also reduce the chances of infringing the rights of others when

commercializing your products. While a patent by itself does not provide the “freedom to use”, it does

Page 63: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

57 | P a g e

prevent others from patenting the same or similar inventions and provides a reasonable indication that

the invention that you have patented is new and significantly different from the “prior art.”

Enhanced ability to obtain grants and/or raise funds at a reasonable rate of interest. Ownership of

patents (or license to use patents owned by others) may enhance your ability to raise capital to take a

product to market. In some sectors (e.g., biotechnology), it is often necessary to have a strong patent

portfolio to attract venture capitalists.

A powerful tool to take action against imitators and free riders: In order to effectively enforce the

exclusivity provided by a patent, it may occasionally be necessary to litigate, or bring your patents to the

attention of those who are violating your patent rights. Owning a patent considerably improves your

ability to take successful legal action against copiers and imitators of the protected invention.

Positive image for your enterprise: Business partners, investors, shareholders and customers may

perceive patent portfolios as a demonstration of the high level of expertise, specialization and

technological capacity of your company. This may prove useful for raising funds, finding business

partners and raising your company’s profile and market value. Some companies mention or list their

patents in advertisements to project an innovative image to the public.

If an invention is patentable, is it always wise to apply for patent protection?

Not always. If an invention is patentable, it does not necessarily follow that it will result in a

commercially viable technology or product. Therefore, a careful weighing of pros and cons and an

analysis of possible alternatives is essential before filing a patent application.

A patent may be expensive and difficult to obtain, maintain and enforce. To file or not to file a patent

application is strictly a business decision. It should be based primarily on the probability of obtaining

commercially useful protection for the invention that is likely to provide significant benefits from its

eventual business use. Factors to be taken into account in deciding whether or not to file a patent

application include:

• Is there a market for the invention?

• What are the alternatives to your invention, and how do they compare with your invention?

• Is the invention useful for improving an existing product or developing a new product? If so,

does it fit in with your company’s business strategy?

• Are there potential licensees or investors who will be willing to help to take the invention to

market?

• How valuable will the invention be to your business and to competitors?

• Is it easy to “reverse engineer” your invention from your product or “design around” it?

• How likely are others, especially competitors, to invent and patent what you have invented?

• Do the expected profits from an exclusive position in the market justify the costs of patenting?

• What aspects of the invention can be protected by one or more patents, how broad can this

coverage be and will this provide commercially useful protection?

• Will it be easy to identify violation of the patent rights and are you ready to invest time and

financial resources for enforcing your patent(s)?

Page 64: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

58 | P a g e

What can be patented?

• An invention must meet several requirements to be eligible for patent protection. These

include, in particular, that the claimed invention:

• Consists of patentable subject matter

• Is new (novelty requirement)

• Involves an inventive step (nonobviousness requirement)

• Is capable of industrial application (utility requirement)

• Is disclosed in a clear and complete manner in the patent application (disclosure requirement)

The best way of understanding these requirements is to study what has been patented by others in the

technical field of your interest. For this, you may consult patent databases.

What is patentable subject matter?

In most national or regional patent laws, patentable subject matter is defined negatively, i.e., by

providing a list of what cannot be patented. While there are considerable differences between

countries, the following are examples of some of the areas that may be excluded from patentability:

• Discoveries and scientific theories;

• Aesthetic creations;

• Schemes, rules and methods for performing mental acts;

• Mere discoveries of substances as they naturally occur in the world;

• Inventions that may affect public order, good morals or public health;

• Diagnostic, therapeutic and surgical methods of treatment for humans or animals;

• Plants and animals other than microorganisms, and essentially biological processes for the

production of plants or animals other than non-biological and microbiological processes; and

• Computer programs.

How is an invention judged to be new or novel?

An invention is new or novel if it does not form part of the prior art. In general, prior art refers to all the

relevant technical knowledge available to the public anywhere in the world prior to the first filing date

of the relevant patent application. It includes, inter alia, patents, patent applications and non-patent

literature of all kinds.

The definition of prior art differs considerably from country to country. In many countries, any

information disclosed to the public anywhere in the world in written form, by oral communication, by

display or through public use constitutes prior art. Thus, in principle, the publication of the invention in a

scientific journal, its presentation in a conference, its use in commerce or its display in a company’s

catalogue would all constitute acts that could destroy the novelty of the invention and render it not

patentable. It is important to prevent accidental disclosure of inventions prior to filing the patent

application.

Page 65: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

59 | P a g e

Assistance of a competent patent agent is often crucial for a clear determination of what is included in

the prior art. Prior art often includes “secret prior art” such as pending unpublished patent applications,

provided they are published at a later stage.

When is an invention considered to “involve an inventive step”?

An invention is considered to involve an inventive step (or to be non-obvious) when, taking into account

the prior art, the invention would not have been obvious to a person skilled in the particular field of

technology. The non-obviousness requirement is meant to ensure that patents are only granted in

respect of truly creative and inventive achievements, and not to developments that a person with

ordinary skill in the field could easily deduce from what already exists.

Some examples of what may not qualify as inventive, as established by past court decisions in some

countries, are: mere change of size; making a product portable; the reversal of parts; the change of

materials; or the mere substitution by an equivalent part or function.

What is meant by “capable of industrial application”?

To be patentable, an invention must be capable of being used for an industrial or business purpose. An

invention cannot be a mere theoretical phenomenon; it must be useful and provide some practical

benefit. The term “industrial” is meant here in the broadest sense as anything distinct from purely

intellectual or aesthetic activity, and includes, for example, agriculture. In some countries, instead of

industrial applicability, the criterion is utility.

The utility requirement has become particularly important for patents on genetic sequences for which a

utility may not yet be known at the time of filing the application.

What is the disclosure requirement?

According to the national legislation of most countries, a patent application must disclose the invention

in a manner sufficiently clear and complete for the invention to be carried out by a person skilled in the

specific technical field. In some countries, patent law requires that the inventor discloses the “best

mode” for practicing the invention. For patents involving microorganisms, many countries require the

microorganism to be deposited at a recognized depositary institution.

What rights are granted by patents?

A patent grants its owner the right to exclude others from commercially using the invention. This

includes the right to prevent or stop others from making, using, offering for sale, selling or importing a

product or process, based on the patented invention, without the owner’s permission. It is important to

note that a patent does not grant the owner the “freedom to use” or the right to exploit the technology

covered by the patent but only the right to exclude others.

Page 66: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

60 | P a g e

While this may seem a subtle distinction, it is essential in understanding the patent system and how

multiple patents interact. In fact, patents owned by others may overlap, encompass or complement

your own patent. You may, therefore, need to obtain a license to use other people’s inventions in order

to commercialize your own patented invention and vice versa. Also, before certain inventions (such as

pharmaceutical drugs) can be commercialized other clearances may be required (e.g., marketing

approval from the relevant regulatory body).

Who is an inventor and who owns the rights over a patent?

The person who conceived the invention is the inventor, whereas the person (or company) that files the

patent application is the applicant, holder or owner of the patent. While in some cases the inventor may

also be the applicant, the two are often different entities; the applicant is often the company or

research institution that employs the inventor. The following specific circumstances merit further

analysis:

Employee inventions: In many countries, inventions developed in the course of employment are

automatically assigned to the employer. In some countries, this is only so if it is so stated in the

employment contract. In some cases (e.g., if there is no employment agreement) the inventor may

retain the right to exploit the invention, but the employer is given a non-exclusive right to use the

invention for its internal purposes (called “shop rights”). It is important to find out about the specific

legislation in your own country and to ensure that employment contracts deal with issues of ownership

over employee inventions to avoid future disputes.

Independent contractors: In most countries, an independent contractor hired by a company to develop

a new product or process owns all rights to the invention, unless specifically stated otherwise. This

means that, unless the contractor has a written agreement with the company assigning the invention to

that company, in general, the company will have no ownership rights in what is developed, even if it

paid for the development.

Joint inventors: When more than one person contributes in significant ways to the conception and

realization of an invention, they must be treated as joint inventors and mentioned as such in the patent

application. If the joint inventors are also the applicants, the patent will be granted to them jointly.

Joint owners: Different countries and institutions have different rules concerning the exploitation or

enforcement of patents that are owned by more than one entity or person. In some cases, no single co-

owner may license a patent or sue third parties for infringement without the consent of all other co-

owners.

Page 67: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

61 | P a g e

6.2.2 How to get a patent?

Where should you start?

Generally the first step is to perform a prior art search. With over 40 million patents granted worldwide,

and millions of printed publications, which are potential prior art against your patent application, there

is a serious risk that some reference, or combination of references, may render your invention non-

novel or obvious, and, therefore, un-patentable.

A prior art patentability search can prevent you from wasting money on a patent application if the

search uncovers prior art references that are likely to preclude the patenting of your invention.

A prior art search should extend to all relevant non patent literature, including technical and scientific

journals, textbooks, conference proceedings, theses, websites, company brochures, trade publications

and newspaper articles.

Patent information is a unique source of classified technical information, which companies may find of

great value for their strategic business planning. Most significant inventions are disclosed to the public

for the first time only when the patent or patent application is published. Thus, patents and published

patent applications provide means of learning about current research and innovations often long before

the relevant innovative product appears on the market. Patent searches should be part of the essential

inputs to any company’s R&D effort.

How and where can you conduct a prior art search?

Patents and patent applications published by many patent offices are accessible on-line, thus making it

easier to conduct prior art searches. A list of IP offices that have made their patent databases available

online, free-of-charge, may be found at: www.wipo.int/ipdl/en/resources/links.jsp.

In addition, most national patent offices offer patent search services for a fee. While access to patent

information is considerably simpler thanks to the Internet, it is not easy to perform a high-quality patent

search. Patent jargon is often complex and obscure and professional searching requires considerable

knowledge and expertise. While preliminary searches may be performed through free on-line patent

databases, most companies requiring patent information for making key business decisions (e.g.,

whether to apply for a patent or not) will generally rely on the services of patent professionals and/or

use more sophisticated commercial databases.

A prior art search can be done based on keywords, patent classification or other search criteria. The

prior art uncovered depends on the search strategy employed, the classification system used, the

technical expertise of the person who conducts the search, and the patent database being used.

Page 68: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

62 | P a g e

How to apply for patent protection?

After a prior art search has been performed and the decision to seek patent protection has been made,

a patent application has to be prepared and submitted to the relevant national or regional patent office.

The application will include a full description of the invention, the patent claims that determine the

scope of the patent applied for, drawings and an abstract. Some patent offices make it possible for

applicants to submit their application through the Internet. In some countries, there may be an option

for filing a provisional patent application.

The task of preparing a patent application is generally performed by a patent attorney or agent who will

represent your interests during the application process. The box on the following page provides a basic

overview of the application process. Note that there may be important variations between countries

and it is always best to check with the patent office of the relevant country or a patent law firm in the

relevant country to obtain up-to-date information on procedures and applicable fees.

How much does it cost to patent an invention?

The costs vary considerably from country to country and within a country depending on factors such as

the nature of the invention, its complexity, attorney’s fees, the length of the application and objections

raised during the examination by the patent office. It is important to keep in mind and properly budget

the costs related to patent application and maintenance:

• There are generally costs associated with performing a prior art search, particularly if you rely

on the services of an expert;

• There are official filing fees that vary widely from country to country. The relevant national or

regional patent office will be able to give you details on the fee structure. Some countries have

discounts for SMEs and/or for applicants filing the application on-line. In addition, some

countries allow expedited examination on payment of additional fees.

• If you rely on the services of a patent agent/attorney to assist you in the application process

(e.g., provide the patentability opinion, draft the patent application, prepare the formal

drawings and correspond with the patent office), you will incur additional costs;

• Once a patent has been granted by the patent office, you must pay maintenance or renewal

fees, generally on an annual basis, to maintain the validity of the patent;

• In case you decide to patent your invention abroad, you should consider also the relevant

official filing fees for the countries in question, the translation costs and the costs of using local

patent agents (which is a requirement, in many countries, for foreign applicants).

• In case of inventions involving microorganisms, where the deposit of the micro-organism or

biological material with a recognized depositary institution is necessary, fees for filing, storage

and viability testing of the deposited material will have to be paid.

Page 69: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

63 | P a g e

When should you file a patent application?

In general, it is preferable to apply for patent protection as soon as you have all the information

required for drafting the patent application. However, there are a number of factors that help an

applicant to decide the best time to file a patent application. Reasons for ensuring that your application

is filed early include the following:

• In most countries worldwide (with the notable exception of the United States of America)

patents are granted on a first-to-file basis. Thus, filing an application early is important to

ensure that you are the first to file an application on that particular invention so that you do not

lose your invention to others.

• Applying for patent protection early will generally be useful if you are seeking financial support

or wish to license your invention to commercialize it.

• You can generally only enforce a patent once it has been granted by the relevant patent office,

which is a procedure that may take a few years.

Nevertheless, rushing to file a patent application as soon as you have an invention may also be a

problem for the following reasons:

• If you apply too early and subsequently make changes to your invention it will generally not be

possible to make significant changes to the original description of the invention.

• Once you have filed your application in one country or region, you normally have 12 months to

file an application for the same invention in all the countries of interest to your business in

order to enjoy the benefit of the filing date of your first application. This may be a problem if

the costs of applying in various countries and paying the maintenance fees are too high for your

company. One way of mitigating this problem, is by postponing the payments of translation and

national fees for a period of 30 months by using the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT).

When deciding on the timing for filing a patent application, it is important to bear in mind that the

application should be filed before disclosing the invention. Any disclosure before filing the application

(e.g., for test-marketing, to investors or other business partners) should be done only after signing a

confidentiality or nondisclosure agreement.

How important is it to keep an invention confidential prior to filing a patent application?

If you wish to obtain a patent on your invention, keeping it confidential prior to filing the application is

absolutely necessary. In many circumstances, public disclosure of your invention prior to filing the

application would destroy the novelty of your invention, rendering it un-patentable, unless the

applicable law provides for a “grace period”. It is, therefore, extremely important for inventors,

researchers and companies to avoid any disclosure of an invention that might affect its patentability

until the patent application has been filed.

Page 70: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

64 | P a g e

What is a “grace period”?

The legislation of some countries provides a “grace period” of 6 or 12 months, from the moment an

invention was disclosed by the inventor or the applicant until the application is filed, in which the

invention does not lose its patentability because of such disclosure. In such countries, a company may

disclose its invention, for example by displaying it in a trade show or publishing it in a company

catalogue or technical journal, and file the patent application within the grace period without the

invention losing patentability and being barred from obtaining a patent.

However, as this is not the case in all countries, relying on the grace period in your own country would

preclude you from patenting the invention in other markets of interest where a grace period is not

available.

What is the structure of a patent application?

A patent application has a range of functions:

• It determines the legal scope of the patent;

• It describes the nature of the invention, including instructions on how to carry out the invention;

and

• It gives details of the inventor, the patent owner and other legal information.

Patent applications are similarly structured worldwide and consist of a request, a description, claims,

drawings (if necessary) and an abstract. A patent document may be anywhere between a few pages to

hundreds of pages long, depending on the nature of the specific invention and the technical field

Request: It contains information on the title of the invention, the date of filing, the priority date and

bibliographic data such as the name and address of the applicant and inventor.

Description: The written description of an invention must describe the invention in sufficient detail so

that anyone skilled in the same technical field can reconstruct and practice the invention from the

description and the drawings without putting in further inventive effort. If this is not the case, the

patent may not be granted or may be revoked after it is challenged in a court action.

Claims: The claims determine the scope of protection of a patent. The claims are absolutely crucial to a

patented invention since, if they are badly drafted, even a truly valuable invention could result in a

worthless patent that is easy to circumvent or design around. In patent litigation, interpreting the claims

is generally the first step in determining whether the patent is valid and in determining whether the

patent has been infringed. It is strongly advisable to seek the advice of an expert to draft patent

applications, particularly the claims.

Drawings: The drawings show the technical details of the invention in an abstract and visual way. They

help to explain some information, tool or result set out in the disclosure. Drawings are not always a

necessary part of the application. If the invention is for a process or method of doing something,

drawings usually are not required. If drawings are required, formal rules govern their acceptability.

Abstract: The abstract is a brief summary of the invention. When the patent is published by the patent

office, the abstract is included on the front page. The abstract is sometimes improved or drafted by the

patent examiner in the relevant patent office.

Page 71: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

65 | P a g e

How long does it take to obtain patent protection?

The time taken for a patent office to grant a patent varies significantly from office to office and between

fields of technology and may range from a few months to a few years, generally between 2 to 5 years.

Some patent offices have established a procedure for accelerated grant that can be requested by

applicants in specific circumstances.

From what date is your invention protected?

Your rights effectively begin on the date of grant of your patent, as you can only take legal action against

unauthorized use of the invention by third parties once it has been granted. In some countries, you may

sue infringers after the grant, for infringement that occurred between the date of publication of the

patent application (generally 18 months after the first application has been filed) and the date of grant.

Typically, you may claim reasonable compensation for use between publication and grant. But this is not

the case in all countries.

In some countries, it is possible to file a patent application and a utility model application for the same

invention. This is sometimes done in order to benefit from utility model protection (which is generally

granted faster) until the patent is eventually granted.

How long does patent protection last?

The current international standard provides for a term of protection of 20 years from the filing date of

the application, provided the renewal or maintenance fees are paid on time and that no request for

invalidation or revocation has been successful during this period. While the above relates to the legal life

of a patent, the business or economic life of a patent is over if the technology covered by it is outdated,

if it cannot be commercialized or if the product based on it has not been successful in the market. In all

such circumstances, the patent holder may decide to no longer pay the maintenance or renewal fees,

leaving it to expire earlier than the term of protection of 20 years, and thus, let it fall into the public

domain.

In some countries, protection may be extended beyond 20 years or a Supplementary Protection

Certificate (SPCs) may be granted in very specific circumstances. This is the case, for example, for

patents on pharmaceuticals, due to delayed commercialization resulting from time required to obtain

marketing approval from the appropriate governmental authorities. SPCs have a limited duration and

generally cannot exceed five years.

Do you need a patent agent to file a patent application?

Preparing a patent application and following it through to the grant stage is a complex task. Applying for

patent protection means:

• Making a prior art search in order to identify any prior art that renders your invention

unpatentable;

• Writing the claims and full description of the invention combining legal and technical jargon;

• Corresponding with the national or regional patent office especially during the substantive

examination of the patent application;

• Making the necessary amendments to the application requested by the patent office.

Page 72: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

66 | P a g e

All these aspects require in-depth knowledge of patent law and patent office practice.

Therefore, even if legal or technical assistance is generally not mandatory it is strongly recommended. It

is advisable to rely on a patent agent who has the relevant legal knowledge and experience as well as

the technical background in the technical field of the invention. Most laws require foreign applicants to

be represented by a registered patent agent who is resident in the country.

Can you apply for protection of many inventions through a single application?

Most patent laws provide for certain limitations in respect of the number of different inventions that

may be included in one patent application. These limitations include the so-called requirement of unity

of invention. Whereas some patent laws provide for other types of requirements of unity of invention

(for example, the patent law of the United States of America), others (e.g., the European Patent

Convention and the Patent Cooperation Treaty) permit groups of inventions so linked as to form a single

“inventive concept” to be included in a single application. In case of lack of unity of invention, the

applicant may be required to either restrict the claims or divide the application (divisional applications).

As a result of differences in the applicable law, one patent application may suffice in some countries,

while in others; two or more applications may have to be filed to cover the same ground.

6.2.3. Patenting abroad

Why apply for patents abroad?

Patents are territorial rights, which means that an invention is only protected in the countries or regions

where patent protection has been obtained. In other words, if you have not been granted a patent with

effect in a given country, your invention will not be protected in that country, enabling anybody else to

make, use, import or sell your invention in that country.

Patent protection in foreign countries will enable your company to enjoy exclusive rights over the

patented invention in those countries. In addition, patenting abroad may enable your company to

license the invention to foreign firms, develop outsourcing relationship, and access those markets in

partnership with others.

When should you apply for patent protection abroad?

The date of your first application for a given invention is called the priority date and any subsequent

applications in other countries filed by you within 12 months (i.e., within the priority period) will benefit

from the earlier application and will have priority over other applications for the same invention filed by

others after the priority date. It is highly advisable to file your foreign patent applications within the

priority period.

Page 73: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

67 | P a g e

After the expiration of the priority period and until the patent is first published by the patent office

(generally 18 months after the priority date) you will still have the possibility to apply for protection for

the same invention in other countries, but you can no longer claim priority of your earlier application.

Once the invention has been disclosed or published, you may be unable to obtain patent protection in

foreign countries, due to loss of novelty.

Where should you protect your invention?

As protecting an invention in many countries is an expensive undertaking, companies should carefully

select the countries in which they require protection. Some of the key considerations when selecting

where to patent are:

• Where is the patented product likely to be commercialized?

• Which are the main markets for similar products?

• What are the costs involved in patenting in each target market and what is my budget?

• Where are the main competitors based?

• Where will the product be manufactured?

• How difficult will it be to enforce a patent in a given country?

How do you apply for patent protection abroad?

There are three main ways of protecting an invention abroad:

The national route: You may apply to the national patent office of each country of interest, by filing a

patent application in the required language and paying the required fees. This path may be very

cumbersome and expensive if the number of countries is large.

The regional route: When a number of countries are members of a regional patent system, you may

apply for protection, with effect in the territories of all or some of these, by filing an application at the

relevant regional office. The regional patent offices are:

• The African Intellectual Property Organization (OAPI) (www.oapi.wipo.net);

• The African Regional Intellectual Property Organization (ARIPO) (www.aripo.wipo.net);

• The Eurasian Patent Organization (EAPO) (www.eapo.org);

• The European Patent Office (EPO) (www.epo.org); and

• The Patent Office of the Gulf Cooperation Council (www.gulf-patent-office.org.sa).

The international route: If your company wants to have the option of protecting an invention in any

number of member countries of the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), then you should consider filing an

international PCT application. To be eligible to do so, you must be a national or resident of a PCT

Contracting State or, your business must have a real and effective industrial or commercial presence in

one of these countries. By filing one international application under the PCT, you may simultaneously

seek patent protection for an invention in the more than 125 member countries of the PCT. This

application may be filed either at your national or regional patent office and/or at the PCT receiving

office at the World Intellectual Property Office (WIPO) in Geneva, Switzerland.

Page 74: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

68 | P a g e

6.2.4 Commercializing patented technology

How do you commercialize patented technology?

A patent on its own is no guarantee of commercial success. It is a tool that enhances a company’s

capacity to benefit from its inventions. In order to provide a tangible benefit to a company, a patent

needs to be exploited effectively and will generally make money only if the product based on the patent

is successful in the market or boosts the firm’s reputation and bargaining power. To take a patented

invention to market, a company has a range of options:

• Commercializing the patented invention directly;

• Selling the patent to someone else;

• Licensing the patent to others;

• Establishing a joint venture or other strategic alliance with others having complementary assets.

How do you take a patented product to market?

The commercial success of a new product in the market does not only hinge on its technical features. As

great as an invention may be from a technical point of view, if there is no effective demand for it or if

the product is not properly marketed it is unlikely to attract consumers.

Commercial success, therefore, also depends on a range of other factors, including the design of the

product, the availability of financial resources, the development of an effective marketing strategy and

the price of the product in comparison with that of competing or substitute products.

To take an innovative product to market, it is generally helpful to develop a business plan. Business

plans are effective tools for examining the feasibility of a business idea. A business plan is essential for

approaching an investor to obtain financial resources to take a new patented product to market.

Including information on your company’s patents and patent strategy in the business plan is important,

as it is a strong indicator of the novelty of your company’s products, provides evidence of due diligence

and reduces the risk of infringement of other companies’ patents.

Can you sell your patent?

Yes, this is called assigning your patent, and it will permanently transfer ownership of the patent to

another person. Such a decision must be very carefully considered. By licensing your patent instead of

assigning it, you obtain the benefit of royalties for the remainder of the life of the patent. Licensing can

be a very financially rewarding strategy for that reason. Assignment, on the other hand, means you

receive an agreed-upon payment once, with no future royalties, regardless of how profitable the patent

ends up being.

There may be occasions when an assignment is advantageous. If a patent is sold for a lump sum, you get

the value immediately, without having to wait up to 20 years to realize that value progressively. You also

avoid the risk that the patent may be superseded by another technology. In addition, assignment of the

patent to a start-up company may be a precondition for funding, if the patent does not belong to the

company.

Page 75: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

69 | P a g e

In each case, it is an individual decision, based on your needs and priorities. However, assigning a patent

is generally not recommended and patent owners generally prefer to maintain ownership over their

inventions and grant licenses.

How do you license your patent to be exploited by others?

A patent is licensed when the owner of the patent (the licensor) grants permission to another (the

licensee) to use the patented invention for mutually agreed purposes. In such cases, a licensing contract

is generally signed between the two parties, specifying the terms and scope of the agreement.

Authorizing others to commercialize your patented invention through a licensing agreement will enable

your business to obtain an additional source of revenue and is a common means of exploiting a

company’s exclusive rights over an invention. Licensing is particularly useful if the company that owns

the invention is not in a position to make the product at all or in sufficient quantity o meet a given

market need, or to cover a given geographical area.

As a license agreement requires skillful negotiations and drafting, it is advisable to seek the assistance of

a licensing practitioner for negotiating the terms and conditions and for drafting the licensing

agreement. In some countries, licensing agreements need to be registered with a government

regulatory authority.

What royalty rate should you expect to receive for your patent?

In licensing deals, the owner of the right is generally remunerated through lump-sum payments and/or

through recurring royalties, which may be based on sales volume of the licensed product (per unit

royalty) or on net sales (net sales-based royalty). In many cases, the remuneration for a patent license is

a combination of a lump-sum payment and royalties. Sometimes, an equity stake in the company of the

licensee may replace a royalty.

While industry standards for royalty rates exist for particular industries and may usefully be consulted, it

must be remembered that each licensing agreement is unique and the royalty rate depends on the

particular and very distinct factors being negotiated. Therefore, industry standards may provide some

useful initial guidance but too great a reliance on such standards is often misplaced.

What is the difference between an exclusive and non-exclusive license?

There are three types of licensing agreements depending on the number of licensees that will be

allowed to work the patent:

• Exclusive license: a single licensee has the right to use the patented technology, which cannot

even be used by the patent owner;

• Sole license: a single licensee and the patent owner have the right to use the patented

technology; and

• Non-exclusive license: several licensees and the patent owner have the right to use the

patented technology.

Page 76: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

70 | P a g e

In a single licensing agreement, there may be provisions that grant some rights on an exclusive basis and

others on a sole or non exclusive basis.

Should you grant an exclusive or non-exclusive license for your patent?

It depends on the product and on your company’s business strategy. For example, if your technology can

become a standard that is needed by all players in a specific market to perform their business, a non-

exclusive, widely held license would be the most advantageous. If your product needs one company to

invest heavily to commercialize the product (e.g., a pharmaceutical product that requires investments in

performing clinical trials),a potential licensee would not want to face competition from other licensees,

and may rightly insist on obtaining an exclusive license.

When is the best time to license your invention?

There is no best time to license your invention, as the timing will depend on the specificities of the case.

However, for an independent entrepreneur or inventor, it is often advisable to start the search for

licensees as early as possible in order to guarantee a revenue stream that will be useful to cover the

costs of patenting. There is no need to wait for the patent to be granted. More than the right time, it is

critical to find the right partner(s) to generate profits from the commercialization of the patented

invention.

If you are interested in a competitor’s patent, can you obtain permission to use it?

It may not always be easy or affordable to obtain authorization to incorporate technology owned by a

competitor into your products/processes. However, if your competitor is also interested in your

company’s patents, then you should think of cross-licensing. Cross-licensing is very common in

industries where a number of patents covering a wide range of complementary inventions are held by

two or more competitors. Such competing companies seek to ensure their freedom to operate by

obtaining the right to use patents owned by their competitors while providing the right to use their own

patents to the competitors.

7.2.5 Enforcing patents

Why should you enforce patent rights?

If you launch a new or improved product and it is successful in the market, it is likely that competitors

will sooner or later attempt to make products with technical features that are identical, or very similar,

to those of your product. In some cases, competitors may have the benefit of economies of scale,

greater market access, or access to cheaper raw materials, and be able to make a similar or identical

product at a cheaper price. This could put heavy pressure on your business, especially if it has invested

significantly in R&D for creating the new or improved product.

Page 77: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

71 | P a g e

The exclusive rights granted by a patent give the patent owner the opportunity to prevent or stop

competitors from making products and using processes that infringe on its rights and to seek

compensation for damages suffered. To prove that infringement has occurred, it must be shown that

each and every element of a given claim, or its equivalent, is contained in the infringing product or

process. Enforcing your rights when you believe that your patented invention is being copied may be

crucial to maintaining your competitive edge, market share and profitability.

Who is responsible for enforcing patent rights?

The main responsibility for identifying and taking action against infringers of a patent lies with its owner.

As a patent owner, you are responsible for monitoring the use of your invention in the marketplace,

identifying any infringers and deciding whether, how and when to take action against them.

Independent inventors and SMEs may decide to shift this responsibility (or part of it) to an exclusive

licensee. It is advisable to contact a patent lawyer to assist you in taking any steps for enforcing your

patent, both domestically and/or in any export markets. A lawyer will also advise you on the costs and

the risks involved and the best strategy.

What should you do if your patent is being used by others without your authorization?

If you believe that others are infringing your patent, i.e., using it without your authorization, then, as a

first step, you need to collect information about infringing parties and their use of the infringing product

or process. You should accumulate all available facts to determine the nature and timing of your action.

Always engage a patent lawyer to assist you in making a decision on the infringement of your patented

invention. In some cases, when infringement is detected, companies choose to send a letter (commonly

known as a “cease and desist letter”) informing the alleged infringer of a possible conflict between your

rights and the other company’s business activity. This procedure is often effective in the case of non-

intentional infringement since the infringer will in many such cases either discontinue such activities or

agree to negotiate a licensing agreement.

Sometimes, however, surprise is the best tactic in order to avoid giving the infringer time to hide or

destroy evidence. In these circumstances, it might be appropriate to go to court without giving notice to

the infringer and to ask for an “interim injunction” in order to surprise the infringer by a raid, often with

the help of the police, at his business premises. The court may order that the alleged infringers stop

their infringing action pending the outcome of a trial (which may take many months or years).

However, the question of whether a patent has been infringed may be very complex and a decision may,

therefore, only be taken in proceedings on the merits of the case. Where the company decides to

initiate civil proceedings, the courts generally provide a wide range of civil remedies to compensate

aggrieved owners of patent rights. A patent lawyer will be able to provide you the relevant information.

In order to prevent the importation of goods infringing patents, measures at the international border

may be available to patent holders in some countries through the national customs authorities. Many

countries, however, provide for border measures in accordance with their international obligations only

in cases of importation of counterfeit trademark goods and pirated copyright goods. As a general rule, if

you identify infringement, it is highly advisable to seek professional legal advice.

Page 78: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

72 | P a g e

What are your options for settling the patent infringement out of court?

If the dispute is with a company with which there is a signed contract (e.g., a licensing agreement), then

first check whether there is an arbitration or mediation clause in the contract. It is advisable to include a

special provision in contracts for the dispute to be referred to arbitration or mediation in order to avoid

long and expensive litigation. It may be possible to use alternative dispute resolution systems, such as

arbitration or mediation, even if there is no clause in the contract or no contract at all, as long as both

parties agree to it.

Arbitration generally has the advantage of being a less formal and shorter procedure than court

proceedings, and an arbitral award is more easily enforceable internationally. An advantage of

mediation is that the parties retain control of the dispute resolution process. As such, it can help to

preserve good business relations with another enterprise with which your company may wish to

collaborate in the future. The WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center provides services for alternative

dispute resolution. More information on arbitration and mediation can be found at:

arbiter.wipo.int/center/index.html.

References:

1. www.wipo.int/sme

2. www.patentoffice.nic.in

3. www.uspto.gov

4. www.patentoffice.nic.in

About the Authors:

P. Nikhil Prakash

P. Nikhil Prakash did his B-Tech in Electrical & Electronics Engineering from

Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Hyderabad and Higher diploma in

Software Engineering from National Institute of Information Technology.

He is currently working as Business Analyst at Thomson Reuters, worlds’ leading

Information company that accelerates research, scientific discovery and

innovation globally. He is planning co-ordination member was earlier Secretary

General of Cafet-Innova Technical Society an international non-profit organization

helping the scientific community.

Dinesh Pandian

Dinesh Pandian did his M Sc. in Polymer Science from University of Madras and

M-Tech in Plastic Technology from Central Institute of Plastics Engineering and

Technology (CIPET) Chennai.

He also did his PG-Diploma in Intellectual Property Rights Management from Indra

Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU) and is currently working as Senior

Process Lead at Intellectual Property & Science, Thomson Reuters.

Page 79: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

73 | P a g e

Generally most of the research work fails to attract the market even though the quality of

research is very high due to inefficient presentation of the work by the researchers. This chapter

on impact of presentation skills for professional development is added in this book so that the

researcher can learn the tactics of marketing his research work and bring out his innovation for

the industry.

7.1 Presentation Skills

A Presentation is heavy and delivered to a small knowledgeable audience at conference, a seminar

or business meeting. The purpose of a presentation is to inform, persuade, or present a point of

view, which is then followed by questions from the audience. Being a good orator is an asset in

any profession. Speaking skill can be cultivated and developed with some knowledge of the formal

aspects of public speaking and with practice.

To really succeed at presenting and build up effective presentation skills, there are several key

areas that one should know. These key skill areas are:

• Planning and Preparation of the presentation

• Presentation Material and Using visual aids effectively

• Overcoming presentation nerves

• Delivering the presentation confidently

• Answering questions competently

Page 80: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

74 | P a g e

7.1.1 Planning and Preparation of the presentation

7.1.1a Planning

Planning the presentation involves much of the work that is done before the actually delivery of

the presentation. This is a very important where people should consider improving their skills in. A

key part of this planning is to research your presentation audience. The more one knows about

the audience, the easier it is to understand them as to what preconceptions they might have.

7.1.1b Preparation

The most important thing while preparing the text is to decide exactly what to say, where to find

the required information, and how to give it a proper shape. It must be logical and should have a

smooth flow from one point to the next. For beginners, it is advisable to write down the whole

speech, include the address, the opening sentences and the ending sentences. The tone of the

speech is less formal than the tone of writing. All the same there is a formality in official speaking

as distinguished from social or personal style of speaking. Bad habits, often picked up in

conversation, should not be allowed to creep into a speech, repeating phrases should be avoided

7.1.2 Presentation material & using visual aids

Once the planning is done it is important to consider as to what visual aids would be used during

the presentation.

• Think about what you want to do here – why you actually need the visual aids in your

presentation and what are they going to be used for.

• Often they are fairly redundant – people put them in for the sake of it.

Some key presentation skills we’ll be looking at involve reducing the number of slides in a

presentation to the minimum required to support the message. We will further look into as how

we can make visual aids effective and what type of visual aids would help in a presentation. For

example handing out supplemental materials like articles, reports, etc. along with the

presentation, or handing out copies of the presentation, like handing out copies of the slides that

could be used as a reference during the presentation or might use transparency slides or showing

slides from a personal computer.

• If you plan to project your slides from a computer onto a projection screen, then be sure

to check out the computer system before people come into the meeting room, if at all

possible.

• Use a consistent layout, or organization of colors and images, on your materials.

• If you use transparencies on an overhead projector, then allocate one slide for every 3-5

minutes of your presentation. Include 5-8 lines of bulleted phrases on each slide.

• If you provide the supplemental information during your presentation, then your audience

will very likely read that information during your presentation, rather than listening to

you. Therefore, hand out this information after you have completed your presentation.

Page 81: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

75 | P a g e

Or, hand it out at the beginning of your presentation and ask them not to read it until you

have completed your presentation.

• If you hand out copies of your slides, be sure that the text on the slides is large enough

that your audience can read the text on the table in front of them without having to hold

the handouts up to their faces. Be sure to leave space on the handouts for the audience to

make notes on them.

7.1.3 Overcoming presentation nerves

We’re then going to look at You Yourself! To start considering your personal presentation skills.

When most people when they hear the word presentation – previously built “presentation skills”

are often forgotten about and nerves kick in. So we’re going to help you overcome your nerves

and become more confident in your personal presentation skills. There are lots of techniques and

things you can do to help you to control your nerves and build your confidence even before you

actually start your presentation as well as while you’re speaking and delivering it.

7.1.4 Delivering the presentation confidently

It is important to think about how an individual is actually going to deliver his / her presentation.

This section would give an insight at some of the key techniques and skills that would help one to

speak confidently, how to keep the audience’s interest, and engage with them. Usage of personal

resources is very important while delivering a presentation.

• If you plan to project your slides from a computer onto a projection screen, then be sure

to check out the computer system before people come into the meeting room, if at all

possible.

• Use a consistent layout, or organization of colors and images, on your materials.

• If you use transparencies on an overhead projector, then allocate one slide for every 3- 5

minutes of your presentation. Include 5-8 lines of bulleted phrases on each slide.

• If you provide the supplemental information during your presentation, then your audience

will very likely read that information during your presentation, rather than listening to

you. Therefore, hand out this information after you have completed your presentation.

Or, hand it out at the beginning of your presentation and ask them not to read it until you

have completed your presentation.

• If you hand out copies of your slides, be sure that the text on the slides is large enough

that your audience can read the text on the table in front of them without having to hold

the handouts up to their faces. Be sure to leave space on the handouts for the audience to

make notes on them.

7.1.5 Answering questions competently

Finally it is important that one should have the confidence to interact with the audience and deal

with any questions that the audience might throw at you. This section will give an insight to the

techniques to deal with the difficult questions – the different scenarios that one might face while

interacting with the audience

Page 82: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

76 | P a g e

Summary

So these are the 5 key elements (or presentation skills areas) for building and delivering a

successful presentation.

Get to grips with each of them, build your skills and then apply them to you next presentation –

and you’ll be surprised just how much you’ve progressed.

7.2 Communication Skills

The ability to communicate is the primary factor that distinguishes human beings from animals.

And it is the ability to communicate well that distinguishes one individual from another.

Every individual needs to be well equipped with the tools to communicate effectively, whether it

is on the personal front, or at work. In fact, according to the management gurus, being a good

communicator is half the battle won. After all, if one speaks and listens well, then there is little or

no scope for misunderstanding. Thus, keeping this fact in mind, the primary reasons for

misunderstanding is due to inability to speak well, or listen effectively.

Communication skills are the set of skills that enables a person to convey information so that it is

received and understood. Communication skills refer to the repertoire of behaviors that serve to

convey information for the individual.

Communication skills are the ability an individual displays in consistently demonstrates the ability

to effectively communicate with clients, colleagues, subordinates, and supervisors in professional

manner and in the personal department.

Communication skills are generally understood to be the art or technique of persuasion through

the use of oral language and written language. To understand the basic of communication skills,

one need to understand that communication is one of those words that is most hyped in

contemporary culture. It includes a large number of experiences, actions and events; also a variety

of happening and meanings, as well as technologies.

Identification is one of the key ingredients of effective communication. In fact, unless your

listeners can identify with what you are saying and with the way you are saying it, they are not

likely to receive and understand your message.”

The quote above is the underlying factor that explains the importance of communication skills. In

fact, there are other such quotes, which are as follows that explains the importance of effective

communications skills.

Good communication is as stimulating as black coffee, and just as hard to sleep after.

The newest computer can merely compound, at speed, the oldest problem in the relations

between human beings, and in the end the communicator will be confronted with the old

problem, of what to say and how to say it.

The way one communicates does not only have an impact on their own profession and personal

relations, but also an effect on others. Those who do not have appropriate communication skills

are usually ignored or simply kept at bay. Where those with good communication skills are are

Page 83: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

77 | P a g e

looked upon and well respected. After all a good listener and a good orator are popular in their

groups - professional and personal.

Communication is an important aspect of behavior; human communication is complicated by all

factors that influence human behavior. Communication is the process of exchanging information,

ideas, and feelings.

7.2.1 The Communication Process

It is essential that the basic elements of communication be identified. These elements are:

• Sender/encoder/speaker

• Receiver/decoder/listener

• Message

• Medium

• Feedback/reply

7.2.1a Sender/encoder/Speaker:

The person who initiates the communication process is normally referred to as the sender. From

his personal data bank he selects ideas, encodes and finally transmits them to the receiver.

7.2.1b Receiver/decoder/listener:

The listener receives an encoded message which he attempts to decode. This process is carried on

in relation to the work environment and the value perceived in terms of the work situation.

7.2.1c Message:

Message is the encoded idea transmitted by the sender. The formulation of the message is very

important for an incorrect patterning can turn the receiver hostile or make him lose interest.

7.2.1d Medium:

Another important element of communication is the medium or channel. It could be oral, written,

or non-verbal, prior to the composition of the message, the medium/ channel should be decided.

7.2.1e Feedback:

This is the most important component of communication. Effective communication takes place

only when there is feedback. The errors and faults that abound in business situations are a result

of lack of feedback. Basic Model of Communication:

Page 84: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

78 | P a g e

7.2.2 Purpose of effective communication:

• Saves time of communication

• Helps in coordinating, controlling and issuing instructions

• Brings improvement in speaking abilities, listening, interacting, writing, convincing and

persuading.

7.2.3 7C’s & 4S’s in Effective communication:

In any business environment, adherence to the 7C’s & 4S’s helps the sender in transmitting his

message with ease and accuracy.

7.2.3a C’s Relevance

1. Credibility Builds trust

2. Courtesy Improves relationship

3. Clarity Makes comprehension easier

4. Correctness Builds confidence

5. Consistency Introduces stability

6. Concreteness Reinforces confidence

7. Conciseness Saves time

7.2.3b 4S’s

S’s Relevance

1. Shortness------ Economizes

2. Simplicity----- Impresses

3. Strength------- convinces

4. Sincerity------ appears

7.2.4 Barriers in Communication

• Sender-oriented

• Receiver-oriented

7.2.4a Sender oriented barriers:

It can be either voluntary or involuntary. At any cost, efforts should be made on the part of the

sender to identify and remove them. Some of the barriers that are sender oriented are:

• Badly expressed message: concrete ideas and well structures message

• Loss in transmission: correct choice of medium or channel

Page 85: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

79 | P a g e

• Semantic problem: simple words and accurate understanding of intension

• Over/under communication: quantum of information should be right

• ‘I’ Attitude: avoid I attitude

• Prejudices: mind free of bias

Rules to overcome the sender oriented barriers:

• Plan and clarify ideas

• Create a climate of trust and confidence

• Time your mind carefully

• Reinforce words with action

• Communicate efficiently

7.2.4b Receiver-oriented barriers:

• Poor retention: jot down points

• Inattentive listening: improve concentration

• Tendency to evaluate: delay evaluation

• Interest and attitudes: develop interest

• Conflicting information: confirm with feedback, clarify

• Differing status and position: encourage juniors to come up with ideas and listen

• Resistance to change: be flexible

• Refutations and arguments: enter into healthy discussions

It matters not so much what you say as it does how you say it. Your communication style is a SET

of various behaviors and methods of relaying information that impact all facets of life “How to

speak.”

Guidelines:

• Speed

• Clarity

• Punctuation

• Pronunciation

• Familiarity

• Fluency

• Expression….

Teaching communication skills can be a rather daunting task, considering that almost every

individual feels that they are very good communicators. In fact, most trainers prefer to be

regarded as facilitators, who are able to bring to light the nuances that occur while communicating

ineffectively, rather than pointing a direct finger and saying - You all cannot communicate well'

Page 86: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

80 | P a g e

and when this occurs the participants are ready to delve deeper within and bring out the negative

aspects of their communications and replace it with the corrective measures.

7.2.5 Some tips to good communication skills:

• Maintain eye contact with the audience: This is vital as it keeps all those present involved

in the conversation. It keeps them interested and on the alert, during the course of the

conversation.

• Body awareness: One needs to be aware of all that their body is conveying to them, as

well as others. For instance, if there is anxiety rising during the course of a conversation

then one feels thirsty and there may be a slight body tremor. At that point one needs to

pause and let someone else speak. A few deep breaths and some water works as the

magic portion at this point.

• Gestures and expressions: One needs to be aware of how to effectively use hand gestures

and the way they need to posture their body to convey their messages effectively.

Sometimes it may happen that they verbally convey something, but their gestures and

facial expressions have another story to tell.

• Convey one's thoughts: It is important for one to courageously convey what they think.

This is because when things are left unsaid, then what is being spoken is not as convincing

as it should be. Then a lack of confidence develops.

• Practice effective communication skills: One should practice speaking and listening skills

as often as possible.

In order to practice effective speaking skills one can be read passages from a book aloud, in front

of a mirror, or simply perform a free speech in front of the mirror. And where listening is

concerned, one can try transcribing from the radio or television, etc. this helps in honing sharper

listening skills.

7.3 Group Discussion Skill

Group discussion (GD) is a discussion by a group of people which involves an exchange of thoughts

and ideas. Group Discussions are largely used by institutes where there is a high level of

competition. Group discussions occur in many different formats – from very informal ones

between friends to highly structured and challenging discussions included as part of a selection

process. In both cases, there are a number of specific skills that we can help our students develop

to become better able to contribute effectively to group discussions.

A Group of 6-15 candidates are made to sit in a circular or a semi-circular (U Shaped) fashion so

that they can see each other and take part in the discussion easily. Roll Numbers may be allotted

to participants for easy recognition. Before the GD, the examiner (observer) announces the topic

for discussion and informs candidates about the time-limit. He may also draw attention towards

the etiquette, rules and regulation, procedure to be followed. He also clears any doubts/queries.

The individuals of the group might be given some initial time to put down their thoughts on the

topic. The examiner observes the proceedings of the discussion from a distance without directly

Page 87: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

81 | P a g e

interfering into it. He examines the performance of each candidate without any prejudice or

favour.

Every candidate is supposed to express his opinion and views on the topic given. The time for

discussion is approximately 20 minutes. A group discussion can be categorically divided into three

different phases:

• Initiation/ Introduction

• Body of the group discussion

• Summarization/ Conclusion

7.3.1 Initiation/ Introduction

When you initiate a Group Discussion, you not only If you can make a favorable first impression

with your content and communication skills after you initiate a Group Discussion, it will help you

sail through the discussion. But if you initiate a Group Discussion and stammer/ stutter/ quote

wrong facts and figures, the damage might be irreparable. If you initiate a Group Discussion

impeccably but don’t speak much after that, it gives the impression that you started the Group

Discussion for the sake of starting it or getting those initial kitty of points earmarked for an

initiator! When you start a Group Discussion, you are responsible for putting it into the right

perspective or framework. So initiate one only if you have in depth knowledge about the topic at

hand.

7.3.2 Different techniques to initiate a Group

Discussion and make a good first impression:

• Quotes

• Definition

• Questions

• Shock statement

• Facts, figures and statistics

• Short story

• General statement

7.3.2a Quotes:

Quotes are an effective way of initiating a Group Discussion. If the topic of a Group Discussion is:

Should the Censor Board be abolished?, you could start with a quote like, ‘Hidden apples are

always sweet’. For a Group Discussion topic like, Customer is King, you could quote Sam (Walmart)

Walton’s famous saying, ‘there is only one boss: the customer. And he can fire everybody in the

company — from the chairman on down, simply by spending his money somewhere else.

Page 88: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

82 | P a g e

7.3.2b Definition:

Start a Group Discussion by defining the topic or an important term in the topic.

For example, if the topic of the Group Discussion is Advertising is a Diplomatic Way of Telling a Lie,

why not start the Group Discussion by defining advertising as, ‘Any paid form of non-personal

presentation and promotion of ideas, goods or services through mass media like newspapers,

magazines, television or radio by an identified sponsor’?

For a topic like The Malthusian Economic Prophecy is no longer relevant, you could start by

explaining the definition of the Malthusian Economic Prophecy.

7.3.2c Questions

Asking a question is an impactive way of starting a Group Discussion. It does not signify asking a

question to any of the candidates in a Group Discussion so as to hamper the flow. It implies asking

a question, and answering it yourself. Any question that might hamper the flow of a Group

Discussion or insult a participant or play devil’s advocate must be discouraged. Questions that

promote a flow of ideas are always appreciated. For a topic like, Should India go to war with

Pakistan, you could start by asking, ‘What does war bring to the people of a nation? We have had

four clashes with Pakistan. The pertinent question is: what have we achieved?’

7.3.2d Shock statement

Initiating a Group Discussion with a shocking statement is the best way to grab immediate

attention and put forth your point. If a Group Discussion topic is, The Impact of Population on the

Indian Economy, you could start with, ‘At the centre of the Indian capital stands a population clock

that ticks away relentlessly. It tracks 33 births a minute, 2,000 an hour, 48,000 a day which

calculates to about 12 million every year. That is roughly the size of Australia. As a current political

slogan puts it, ‘Nothing’s impossible when 1 billion Indians work together’.

7.3.2e Facts, figures and statistics

If you decide to initiate your Group Discussion with facts, figure and statistics make sure to quote

them accurately. Approximation is allowed in macro level figures, but micro level figures need to

be correct and accurate. For example, you can say, approximately 70 per cent of the Indian

population stays in rural areas (macro figures, approximation allowed). But you cannot say 30

states of India instead of 28 (micro figures, no approximations).

7.3.2f Short story

Use a short story in a Group Discussion topic like, Attitude is everything. This can be initiated

with, ‘A child once asked a balloon vendor, who was selling helium gas-filled balloons, whether a

blue-coloured balloon will go as high in the sky as a green-coloured balloon. The balloon vendor

told the child, it is not the colour of the balloon but what is inside it that makes it go high.

Page 89: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

83 | P a g e

7.3.2g General statement

Use a general statement to put the Group Discussion in proper perspective. For example, if the

topic is, Should Sonia Gandhi be the prime minister of India?, you could start by saying, ‘Before

jumping to conclusions like, ‘Yes, Sonia Gandhi should be’, or ‘No, Sonia Gandhi should not be’,

let’s first find out the qualities one needs to be a good prime minister of India. Then we can

compare these qualities with those that Mrs. Gandhi possesses. This will help us reach the

conclusion in a more objective and effective manner.’

7.3.3 DO’s and DON’Ts of Group Discussion

7.3.3a DO’s

• Listen to others. It is not necessary to initiate a Group Discussion

• Initiate the discussion if you are familiar with the topic

• Intervene if the discussion is turning out to be hostile. (It reflects your leadership)

• Speak to the point without Repeating

• Back your points with Facts and Figures

• Be gentle with your presentation

• Be Natural, Calm and Maintain your Composure

• Be Participative and Reciprocate

• Say ‘Thank You’ before ending your presentation

• Think before you speak

• Say what you feel, without going in “Favour”/“Against”

7.3.3b DON’Ts

• Do not be loud or aggressive

• Do not go overboard with enthusiasm if you are familiar with the topic

• Do not interrupt other speakers

• Do not deprecate other speakers

• Do not speak first if you are unfamiliar with the topic. Grab the opportunity to speak, you

also grab the attention of the examiner and your fellow candidates

• Do not change your opinions

• Do not ask irrelevant questions

• Do not stop abruptly

• Do not get nervous if the previous speakers have presented their points in a better way

• Do not exhibit your emotions

Page 90: How to Become a Researcher

How to become a Researcher?

84 | P a g e

7.3.4 Tips:

• If you are a participant always try to be the most key participant.

• Put points firmly and always try to get others support too

• If you find that the discussion is going off the track then never lose an opportunity to bring

it back to stream this is the best point to score max

• Try to keep latest information on the topic

• Be very polite, people may try to provoke you to get more points but try to keep cool

• Most important, don’t wait for your turn to speak when discussion is on. Interrupt politely

if you want to put forward your points

• Last but not the least keeps a tab on the time given for discussion. Score points by

wrapping up the discussion if you feel that the discussion is heating but the time is going

to be over

• During conclusion, do end with the conclusion note. That shows your leadership quality.

References:

• Business Communication, Urmila Rai and S.M. Rai, Himalaya Publications

• Business Communication, RK Madhur, Vikas Publications Pvt Ltd

About the Author:

Dr. R. Suresh Kumar

Dr. R. Suresh Kumar did his MBA and M-Phil from Shivaji University,

Maharashtra and obtained his Ph. D from the same university. He has

more than 15 years of teaching experience and is a pre-placement

trainer for MBA, MCA, B-Tech and B-Pharm students. He is visiting

faculty for AP Productivity Council and also corporate trainer for

various MNCs, Research Centres and Government organizations.

Contact details: [email protected]

9948962356, 8008820556