Justiciability and Separation of Powers- A Neo-Federalist Approac
How the circle and the squares get along. Federalism Federalist #51 Delegated powers Reserved powers...
-
Upload
flora-perry -
Category
Documents
-
view
225 -
download
0
Transcript of How the circle and the squares get along. Federalism Federalist #51 Delegated powers Reserved powers...
How the circle and the squares get along
FederalismFederalist #51Delegated powersReserved powersConcurrent powersProhibited powersElastic clauseMcCulloch v. Maryland (1819)Commerce clauseGibbons v. Ogden (1824)
Terms you need to know after this presentation…
• Dual Federalism• Cooperative Federalism• Grants-in-aid• Categorical grant• Block grant• Mandate• Devolution• Pros and cons of federalism
Who’s job was it to clean up New Orleans and the rest of the coast after Katrina?
Disaster Relief
Should the national gov’t step in to regulate school performance?
No Child Left Behind
Defends the Constitution
Explains why a strong gov’t is necessary
•“If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary.”
Defends separation of powers between state and national gov’t
Federalist #51
Federalism – Two or more governments exercise power and authority over the same people in the same territory
OR… the relationship between the federal government (circle) and the state governments (squares)
What is Federalism?
OLD SCHOOL – Dual Federalism• Federal and state governments remain dominant in their
separate spheres of influence• Gibbons v. Ogden proved life is not that simple
NEW SCHOOL – Cooperative Federalism• State and Federal governments work together to solve
complex problems
2 Federalisms?
Dual Federalism – Layer Cake: Constitution has given limited list of powers to the national gov’t and the rest belongs to the states
2 Federalisms
• Cooperative Federalism – Marble Cake: Mixed set of responsibilities in which all levels of government are engaged in a variety of issues
Federal
State
Competitive: National government, States, and localities all trying to compete with each other over ways to hand out goods/services packages
Permissive: Even though powers are to be shared the States’ powers rest with the National gov’t’s permission
New federalism: Nixon and Reagan were good with this. Power of the fed. Gov’t is limited in favor of the wider powers reserved to the states
Other Forms
1. Checks the Growth of Tyranny
2. Unity without Uniformity
3. Experimentation
4. Training for Future Leaders
5. Government close to the People
Advantages
1. Slow response time to national problems
2. Difficult to know who is responsible
3. Lack of uniformity can lead to conflict
4. So many policies can lead to inefficiency
Disadvantages
-Delegated Powers (enumerated powers) – powers given to Fed gov’t by Constitution- Implied: Inferred from express powers that allow Congress to function
-Concurrent Powers – shared
-Prohibited Powers – denied from both- Ex. Neither gov’t can tax exports
Powers of National Government
•Regulate interstate and international trade
•Coin money
•Declare war
•Maintain an armed forces
•Establish a postal system
•Enforce copyrights
•Sign treaties
Delegated Powers
• Regulate intrastate trade
• Establish schools
• Establish local governments
• Pass statewide laws • safety belt laws• gun laws, etc.
• Run elections
Reserved Powers of the States
•Power to tax
•Maintain courts
•Borrow money
Concurrent Powers
Aka – “Necessary and Proper Clause”Art. I, Sec. 8, Cl. 18 - "The Congress shall have Power - To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof."
Impossible to predict all powers Congress will need to function, sometimes we might have to allow Congress extra powers to fulfill their delegated powers
Elastic Clause
1. National Supremacy Article• Article IV … This Constitution under the
Authority of the United States, shall be SUPREME law of the Land
2. War Power
3. Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause I)
• Wide range of activity• Gibbons v. Ogden
4. Power to Tax and Spend
4 Pillars of Authority
Art. I, Sec. 8, Cl. 3 – ‘The Congress shall have power - To regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes.”
Congress has used the elastic clause to stretch this power
What is commerce? “Buying and selling of goods and services.”
Congress given the power to regulate commerce between foreign countries and US as well as state to state… they control business law.
Commerce clause
1824 – aka “The Steamboat Case”
Ogden received a state licensed monopoly to run a ferry across the Hudson River
Gibbons also saw the potential of the traffic between NJ and NY and obtained a federal license.
Ogden sued saying he had the valid state license, even though Gibbons had US license
Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)
Result – Gibbons wins
Marshall Court says only national gov’t can regulate interstate commerce, not individual states per Art I, sect. 8 commerce clause.
Fed Gov’t gets STRONGER
All trade today is primarily controlled by national law
Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)
Who cares? Why is it important?
Gibbons v. Ogden ruling makes a loop hole giving Congress power to take control over any issue involving the movement of people, or things
Fed gov’t power increased
Commerce Clause
Supremacy Clause
McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)Background
Bank of the US operated in Maryland
Maryland did not want BoUS to operate in state, competition unwanted, unfair
Maryland taxed the bank to put it out of business
McCulloch, BoUS employee, refused to pay the state tax
The Courts as the Umpire of Federalism
Is a Bank of the US Constitutional?
YES. The national gov’t has certain implied powers that go beyond delegated powers. US needs a national bank for borrowing, lending, holding minted money, etc. All of which are delegated powers.
McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)
Can a state tax the federal gov’t?
-NO. The federal gov’t is supreme. Since the BoUS is constitutional, only the feds may tax it.
-John Marshall reaffirmed Supremacy Clause and Elastic Clause
-National (Federal) Gov gets STRONGER
McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)
Commerce clause quiz!!!
1995 – “Gun Free School Zone” law banned possession of a firearm within 1000 feet of a school, 12 year old Lopez carried a gun on to the property
Declared law unconstitutional – “nothing to do with commerce” – carrying a weapon through a school zone is too much of a stretch for “commerce”
LIMITED National government power
United States v. Lopez (1995)
Commerce clause quiz!!! Medicinal MarijuanaControlled Substance Act (1970) – US gov regulates the manufacture, importation, possession, and distribution of certain drugsMedicinal marijuana was legalized in California, but illegal to US government. Raich argued commerce clause should not take effect because 1) there was no business transactions and 2) there were no state border issues.Supreme Court ruled 6-3 against Raich saying that the federal government could trump state laws that permitted medicinal marijuana
Gonzalez v. Raich (2005)
•Reserve Powers- Not delegated to the national gov’t (10th Amendment)
•Create schools and local governments
Powers of the States
Full Faith and Credit Clause• State courts must enforce the civil judgments of the courts in other states
• Must accept their public records and acts as valid
Article IV Section 2• States must extend same privileges and immunities they grant to their own citizens
• Extradition to other states
Interstate Relationships
• Established judicial review - affirms the Court’s position as a coequal branch of government having considerable influence on the politics of government and direction of public policy.
• John Marshall Supreme Court Justice
• Marshall ruled against Marbury stating that it wasn’t under the Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction
Marbury v. Madison (1803)
Fiscal means $
Q – How do you get the states to do things they normally wouldn’t do?
A – Money
Q – What is the answer to any question ever asked?
A – Money
Fiscal Federalism
Money paid from one level of government to another to be spent for a specific purpose
Categorical Grants - target specific purposes and “strings attached.” (States receive funds if state raised age to 21 and lowered BAC to .08)
Block Grants (or flexible grants) – given for broad, general purposes and allow more discretion on how the money is spent (ex. Welfare reform)
Project Grants – Scientific research, highway construction, and job training. Fixed amount of time and strict guidelines
Grants-in-Aid
A requirement that a state undertake an activity or provide a service
Most apply to Civil Rights and the Environment
Often times the states or local gov’ts have to pay the bill of the mandate set by Congress
Mandates
1986 – Asbestos Emergency Response Act, Handicapped Children’s Protection Act1988 – Drug-free Workplace Acts, Ocean Dumping Ban Act1990 – Clean Air ActEX – Columbus, OH spends 23% of the city budget trying to meet environmental mandates (including testing for pesticides used on rice and pineapple)EX – Public schools have to use Internet filtering or schools lose e-rate subsidies
Mandates
Change in SpendingShift towards Federal Gov’t Spending
Federal State Local (City)
1929 17% 23% 60%
1939 47% 23% 30%
1960 64% 17% 19%
1997 66% 19% 15%
Devolution is the return of power to the state gov
Idea is fueled by distrust of the federal gov and the desire to save money by reducing the size of the “bloated federal government”
Devolution
Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996
Eliminated welfare and transferred the money to states as block grants
• States received wide latitude on how to administer “workfare” but with the knowledge that Congress was counting on anti-poverty spending”
• Strings attached: head of family must work or lose benefit; lifetime benefits limited to 5 years; unmarried mother < 18 only receive $ if stay in school and live with adult; immigrants ineligible for 5 years
Devolution Example
Living under 2 governments is great…
Built on compromise, promotes unity
Gov’t duties can be split up
Brings gov’t closer to people
Allows for state gov’t to address issues in unique regions of the country
Allows states to experiment with policy before enacting it at the federal level – Ex. Vermont’s free health care for children
Federalism is good
Living under 2 governments is bad…
States can impede progress of Nation
States are unequal
States have different policy
Easier for states to be dominated by interest groups
Federalism is bad