How the Brain Learns to Read in Environments with High ... · -./0$1 How the Brain Learns to Read...
Transcript of How the Brain Learns to Read in Environments with High ... · -./0$1 How the Brain Learns to Read...
Rule
ResponseChoices
Target
How the Brain Learns to Read in Environments with High-Risk of Illiteracy: an fNIRS Study of Reading Development in Rural Côte d’Ivoire
Kaja K. Jasińska12, Fabrice Tanoh3, Axel Seri4, Sosthene Guei41iUniversity of Delaware, Newark, DE, 2Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT 3Université Félix Houphouët-Boigny, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire, 4Centre d'Action et de Recherche pour la Paix, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire
INTRODUCTIONChildren living in poverty grow up facing numerous obstacles to literacy, including limited time and/or resources dedicated to learning, impoverished learning environments, and inadequate education resources.
Child Labor in Cote d’Ivoire: Estimated 1.3 million children between the ages of 5-17 are working in cocoa production, 14.8% of children working in cocoa production are not attending school (Tulane University, 2015)
Specific Aim: To examine the impact of poor educational access, cocoa labor, and impoverished environments on the behavioral and neural substrates of:• bilingual language development in French and Attié/Baoule/Abidji/Bété• executive functions, and in turn,• reading ability
CONTACTKaja Jasińska, [email protected]; www.haskins.yale.edu/staff/jasinskaSupported by the Jacobs Foundation Early Career Fellowship
SCIENTIFIC CAPACITY BUIDING
READING
METHODS
Robust collaboration with local researchers and long-term mentorship for Ivorian students to provide opportunities to conduct child development research and advance skills in transition to independent global scientists.
Participants. 625 children ages 6-14 in grades 1,3,5 (French: CP1, CE1, CM1)Language Assessment and Literacy Assessment (Yopp et all, 1995; Woodcock et al., 2001 )
Cognitive Assessment (NIH Cognitive Assessment Toolbox)
Survey of Home/School Environment and Child LaborBased on USAID Early Grade Reading Assessment and Tulane University Survey of Child Labor in West African Cocoa Growing Areas (2015)
Measures school attendance and school habits, access to literacy materials, language background, family structure, socioeconomic status, child involvement in cocoa agriculture and other domestic and economic activities
Field fNIRS neuroimaging (Jasinska & Guei, 2018)
Reading: Print+Speech Task
Executive Functions: Rule Switch Task
Task Description French Attié
Phonological Awareness Identification, elision, segmentation � �
Tonemic Awareness Identify words that “share tone” to target n/a �
Vocabulary Synonym and antonym generation � �
Rapid Automatized Naming
Timed digit naming n/a �
Oral Comprehension Listen to story + comprehension questions � �
Reading Letter, word, pseudoword reading � n/a
Task Description
Working Memory: List Sorting Task
Sequence items in a 2-7 item list (animals) according to size.
Attention:Flanker Task
Indicate the arrow direction in congruent and incongruent trials
Boys more exposed to hazardous working conditions (spraying pesticide, cutting trees, burning trees, and/or carrying heavy loads)
DISCUSSIONBEHAVIORAL RESULTSCocoa LaborAgricultural Labor % of Children
Cocoa Labor 55%
Hazardous Cocoa Labor 73%(of children working in cocoa)
Other Plantation 40%
Never 5%
Predictor Std. Beta p-value
Age 0.101 <.05
Gender 0.194 <.0001
Family SES 0.060 >.05
Economic Work 0.216 <.0001
Domestic Work 0.152 <.0001
Cocoa Labor50% of children are working on cocoa plantations, >70% of these children are engaged in hazardous labor on cocoa plantations – this has negative associations with literacy
LiteracyLiteracy outcomes are overall extremely poor. 5th graders’ (CM1) average scores indicate little to no reading competency
BilingualismFrench and local language phonological awareness independently predict literacy– local language matters!
Brain Bases of ReadingStronger readers show patterns of neural activation much like what has previously been reported for Western children. Poorer readers (mean age = 10;6) do not show the same pattern of neural sensitivity to lexicality. These poorer readers do not resemble preliterate children nor children with reading disorder.
SES has a strong impact on functional brain activation in the prefrontal cortex, which in turn, predicts reading outcomes.
Understanding the complex relationships between impoverished environment, brain development, children’s linguistics and cognitive development, and reading outcomes yields new information about reading development in environments with a high risk of illiteracy.
Lexicality
Words Pseudowords Falsefonts/Vocoded
ModalityVisual jeu val valAuditory pied opmu /////
Rule
Repeat Switch
Color Shape ColorandShape
Letter
CP1 CE1 CM1
0
25
50
75
100
Grade
Mea
n
Grade
CP1
CE1
CM1
Word Pseudoword
CP1 CE1 CM1 CP1 CE1 CM1
0
10
20
30
40
50
Classe
Moy
enne
Classe
CP1
CE1
CM1
Letter
CP1 CE1 CM1
0
25
50
75
100
Grade
Mea
n
Grade
CP1
CE1
CM1
Letter
CP1 CE1 CM1
0
25
50
75
100
Grade
Mea
n
Grade
CP1
CE1
CM1
Predictor Letter b Word b Pseudo. bAge 0.83 0.08 -0.34Gender -0.99 -1.70 -2.03+
SES -0.40 -0.26 -0.29+
Cocoa Labor 1.02** 0.42* 0.44**Hazardous Labor (Y/N) -11.20** -3.32 -3.36+
Domestic Work -1.06 -0.44 -0.25Economic Work 1.14+ 0.27 0.22PA (French) 1.02** 0.61** 0.57**Vocab. (French) 0.22 0.16 0.04PA (Local) 0.50** 0.38** 0.28**Vocab. (Local) -0.23 -0.08 -0.14Oral Lang. (French) 1.02+ 0.08 -0.03Oral Lang (Local) -0.45 0.31 0.74Tonemic Awareness 0.09 0.00 -0.06RAN -0.12* -0.01 -0.01Working Memory -0.49 -0.42 -0.53*Inhibitory Control 0.40 0.21 0.20
NEUROIMAGING RESULTSReading CircuitStronger Readers (> 60/100 letter task)Word > False Fonts
Poorer Readers (< 40/100 letter task)False Fonts > Word
Language, Cognitive, and Literacy Assessment
Executive FunctionsPredictor
L.DLPFC(BA9)
R.DLPFC(BA46)
R.DLPFC(BA9)
L.VLPFC(BA44)
std.! (SE) std.! (SE) std.! (SE) std.! (SE)
Age -0.246(0.10)* -0.205(0.10)+ -0.241(0.10)* -0.239(0.10)*Gender -0.445(0.26)+ -0.295(0.27) -0.421(0.26) -0.410(0.27)
BMI 0.050(0.11) 0.041(0.11) 0.049(0.11) 0.047(0.11)
SES -0.227(0.11)* -0.236(0.11)* -0.233(0.11)* -0.234(0.11)*CocoaLabor 0.023(0.20) -0.050(0.20) 0.008(0.20) 0.002(0.20)
HazardousL. 0.043(0.18) 0.058(0.19) 0.047(0.18) 0.048(0.18)
DomesticL. 0.204(0.13) 0.229(0.13)+ 0.212(0.13) 0.215(0.13)
EconomicL. 0.085(0.12) -0.013(0.12) 0.066(0.12) 0.058(0.12)
Predictor Letter b Word b Pseudo.bL.DLPFC -544.626(189.81)** -286.182(124.38)* -222.890(101.51)*
R.DLPFC -933.45(490.13)* -170.767(138.80) -185.294(260.18)
L.VLPFC 1206.369(370.78)** 516.034(246.57)* 421.186(201.24)*
R.VLPFC -30.520(52.27) 16.722(33.40) 7.666(27.26)
**p<.01,*p<.05,+p<.1
**p<.01,*p<.05,+p<.1