How Recurrent Dynamics Explain Crowding
description
Transcript of How Recurrent Dynamics Explain Crowding
How Recurrent Dynamics Explain Crowding Aaron Clarke & Michael H. Herzog
Laboratory of Psychophysics, Brain Mind Institute, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Switzerland
Introduction:
• Crowding is the inability to discriminate objects in clutter• Vernier discrimination, for example, deteriorates when the Vernier is
flanked by parallel lines• Pooling (Wilkinson et al., 1997) and lateral inhibition (Wilson, 1986)
models predict that adding more parallel lines should worsen performance
S S
Lateral Inhibition:
Spatial Pooling:
Inhibitory
Excitatory
Important points about the human data:
1. Effects of adding more lines depends critically on line-length• Information for lines of different lengths flows through separate
channels and may be combined based on a length-based similarity metric
• To model this we implement an end-stopped receptive field filter-bank sensitive to lines of different lengths
• Connection strength between filters selective for different line-lengths depends on their similarity
WBtwWBtw
2. Parallel lines of the same length cause maximal interference• Lateral interactions between parallel receptive
fields modulate the cells’ outputs• This may be modeled by weighting connections
between cells with parallel receptive fields using a lateral-inhibitory association field
Figure 1. Human data. Performance worsens when equal-length flankers are added, but improves when shorter- or longer-length flankers are added (Malania et al., 2007).
2 1610
20
30
40
50
60
Flanks (#)
Thre
shol
d (a
rcse
c)
Human Data
• Adding more lines can, however, improve performance
• We propose that performance worsens when the flankers group with the Vernier, but improves when the flankers segregate from the Vernier
• A recurrent architecture employing a Wilson-Cowan type model can explain these results because it allows local information to propagate globally over time
• Global grouping arises from local, dynamical interactions without explicit grouping rules
Conclusions:• Crowding cannot be explained by lateral inhibition or spatial pooling
models• Crowding can be explained by a Wilson-Cowan type model• Global grouping arises through local dynamics without explicit grouping
rules• Redundant information is suppressed while inhomogeneities are
highlighted
References:• Malania, M., Herzog, M.H. &Westheimer, G. (2007). Grouping of contextual elements that affect Vernier thresholds. Journal of Vision. 7(2):1, 1-7. • Wilkinson, F., Wilson, H.R. & Ellemberg, D. (1997). Lateral interactions in peripherally viewed texture arrays. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A. 14(9): 2057-2068.• Wilson, H.R. (1986). Responses of Spatial Mechanisms Can Explain Hyperacuity. Vision Research. 26(3):453-469.• Wilson, H.R. & Cowan, J.D. (1972). Excitatory and Inhibitory Interactions in Localized Populations of Model Neurons. Biophysical Journal. 12:1-24.
http://lpsy.epfl.ch This work was supported by the ProDoc project “Crowds in Crowding" of the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) Corresponding author: [email protected]
Model Specifics:
⊗⊗
⊗E
I
E
I
E
I
Excitatory
Inhibitory
E
I
E
I
E
I
E
I
E
I
E
I
Excitatory Layer
Inhibitory Layer
End-stopped receptive field array
•X
Input Image
Linking Hypothesis:
0.75 0.8 0.85 0.9 0.95 1
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Cross-Correlation With Vernier Template
Vern
ier T
hres
hold
(arc
sec
)
DataFit
•X •X
2 1610
20
30
40
50
60
Flanks (#)
Thre
shol
d (a
rcse
c)
Model Data
No flanksShortEqualLong
Figure 2. In the end the summed cross-correlations are passed through a sigmoidal non-linearity.
Figure 3. The model nicely predicts the pattern of results obtained by Malania et al. (2007).
Cross-correlate un-flanked Vernier template with the flanked Vernier images
Sum the cross-correlation outputs over space and filter sizes
• The model suppresses homogeneities while highlighting inhomogeneities
• Model outputs for each image at each filter size are cross-correlated (.x) with the outputs for the un-flanked Vernier and summed over filter sizes
• The equal-length flankers outputs correlate poorly with the un-flanked Vernier outputs (e.g. compare black outlined image with green outlined image)
• The long-length flankers outputs correlate well with the un-flanked Vernier outputs (e.g. compare black outlined image with blue outlined image)
WBtw