How is psychology different from philosophy?

21
How is psychology How is psychology different from different from philosophy? philosophy?

description

How is psychology different from philosophy?. What qualifies  research as science?. Psychological research must meet certain criteria in order to be considered scientific. Research must be: 1. Replicable 2. Falsifiable 3. Precise 4. Parsimonious. Replicable. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of How is psychology different from philosophy?

Page 1: How is psychology different from philosophy?

How is psychology How is psychology different from different from philosophy?philosophy?

Page 2: How is psychology different from philosophy?

What qualifies What qualifies research as science?research as science?

Psychological research must meet Psychological research must meet certain criteria in order to be certain criteria in order to be considered scientific.considered scientific.

Research must be: Research must be: 1. Replicable1. Replicable 2. Falsifiable2. Falsifiable 3. Precise 3. Precise 4. Parsimonious4. Parsimonious

Page 3: How is psychology different from philosophy?

ReplicableReplicable

Research is replicable when others can Research is replicable when others can repeat it and get the same results. repeat it and get the same results.

Q: If something is only true once, should Q: If something is only true once, should we trust it?we trust it?

Page 4: How is psychology different from philosophy?

FalsifiableFalsifiable

A good theory or hypothesis also must be A good theory or hypothesis also must be falsifiablefalsifiable, which means that it must be , which means that it must be stated in a way that makes it possible to stated in a way that makes it possible to reject it. In other words, we have to be able reject it. In other words, we have to be able to prove a theory or hypothesis wrong.to prove a theory or hypothesis wrong.

Page 5: How is psychology different from philosophy?

FalsifiableFalsifiable

Example: Example:

Some people theorize that the Loch Ness Monster not Some people theorize that the Loch Ness Monster not only exists but has become intelligent enough to only exists but has become intelligent enough to elude detection by hiding in undiscovered, elude detection by hiding in undiscovered, undetectable, underwater caves. This theory is not undetectable, underwater caves. This theory is not falsifiable. Researchers can never find these falsifiable. Researchers can never find these undiscovered caves or the monster that supposedly undiscovered caves or the monster that supposedly hides in them, and they have no way to prove this hides in them, and they have no way to prove this theory wrong.theory wrong.

Page 6: How is psychology different from philosophy?

PrecisePrecise

To make hypotheses more precise, psychologists use To make hypotheses more precise, psychologists use operational definitions to define the variables they study. operational definitions to define the variables they study. Operational definitionsOperational definitions state exactly how a variable will state exactly how a variable will be measured.be measured.

Ex.: Ex.: A psychologist conducts an experiment to find out whether A psychologist conducts an experiment to find out whether

toddlers are happier in warm weather or cool weather. She toddlers are happier in warm weather or cool weather. She needs to have an operational definition of happiness so that needs to have an operational definition of happiness so that she can measure precisely how happy the toddlers are. She she can measure precisely how happy the toddlers are. She might operationally define happiness as “the number of might operationally define happiness as “the number of smiles per hour.smiles per hour.

Page 7: How is psychology different from philosophy?

ParsimoniousParsimonious

The principle of parsimony maintains that researchers should The principle of parsimony maintains that researchers should apply the simplest explanation possible to any set of apply the simplest explanation possible to any set of observations. observations.

Example: Example: Suppose a student consistently falls asleep in her statistics class. Suppose a student consistently falls asleep in her statistics class.

She theorizes that before each class, her statistics professor She theorizes that before each class, her statistics professor secretly sprays her seat with a nerve gas that makes her very secretly sprays her seat with a nerve gas that makes her very drowsy. If she had applied the principle of parsimony, she drowsy. If she had applied the principle of parsimony, she would not have come up with this theory. She can account would not have come up with this theory. She can account for her sleepiness with a much simpler and more likely for her sleepiness with a much simpler and more likely explanation: she finds statistics boring.explanation: she finds statistics boring.

Page 8: How is psychology different from philosophy?

The ExperimentThe Experiment

An experiment involves a set of An experiment involves a set of controlled conditions that aim to controlled conditions that aim to confirm a hypothesis.confirm a hypothesis.

Hypothesis Hypothesis refers to a statement of refers to a statement of cause and effect:cause and effect:

““Higher environmental temperatures lead Higher environmental temperatures lead to more aggression.”to more aggression.”

Page 9: How is psychology different from philosophy?

Experimental VariablesExperimental Variables

To test a hypothesis, an experimenter To test a hypothesis, an experimenter defines the variables of the hypothesis:defines the variables of the hypothesis: Cause: Cause: Independent variableIndependent variable (IV) (IV)

temperature: can be manipulated with intenttemperature: can be manipulated with intent Effect: Effect: Dependent variableDependent variable (DV) (DV)

aggressionaggression: # of acts of verbal/aggression in an hour: # of acts of verbal/aggression in an hour

The experimenter “manipulates” the IV and The experimenter “manipulates” the IV and measures the DV to test the hypothesis.measures the DV to test the hypothesis.

Page 10: How is psychology different from philosophy?

Experimental IssuesExperimental Issues

ControlsControls are important for determining causality are important for determining causality the the onlyonly difference between the experimental difference between the experimental

and control groups is the presence or absence of and control groups is the presence or absence of the IV.the IV.

Placebo effectsPlacebo effects represent changes in behavior that are represent changes in behavior that are related to expectations of a treatment.related to expectations of a treatment. placebo effects are controlled by a “blind” placebo effects are controlled by a “blind”

control group control group Experimenter bias Experimenter bias refers to expectations that refers to expectations that

influence a participant’s behavior.influence a participant’s behavior. example: Clever Hans, the horse who could do example: Clever Hans, the horse who could do

mathmath can be controlled using double blind procedurescan be controlled using double blind procedures

Page 11: How is psychology different from philosophy?

Non-Experimental Non-Experimental ResearchResearch

Naturalistic observationNaturalistic observation refers to systematic recording refers to systematic recording of behavior in a natural state or habitat.of behavior in a natural state or habitat. e.g. observing apes in the wilde.g. observing apes in the wild

Surveys Surveys are instruments designed to sample attitudes or are instruments designed to sample attitudes or behaviors. behaviors. e.g., asking students at a rally how they feel about e.g., asking students at a rally how they feel about

animal rights issuesanimal rights issues

A A case studycase study is an in-depth study of a single person. is an in-depth study of a single person. e.g., Freud used the case study method to study e.g., Freud used the case study method to study

anxietyanxiety

CorrelationsCorrelations refer to looking at the relationship refer to looking at the relationship between two variables without manipulating them.between two variables without manipulating them.

Page 12: How is psychology different from philosophy?

Correlation Correlation TechniquesTechniques

The correlation technique assesses the degree of The correlation technique assesses the degree of association between 2 variables. association between 2 variables.

Correlations vary in direction:Correlations vary in direction: PositivePositive association: increases in the value of association: increases in the value of

variable 1 are associated with increases in variable 1 are associated with increases in variable 2 (e.g., smoking and risk of cancer)variable 2 (e.g., smoking and risk of cancer)

NegativeNegative association: increases in variable 1 association: increases in variable 1 are associated with decreases in the variable 2 are associated with decreases in the variable 2 (e.g., years of education and risk of Alzheimer’s (e.g., years of education and risk of Alzheimer’s disease)disease)

No relation: values of variable 1 are not related No relation: values of variable 1 are not related to variable 2 (e.g., years of education and to variable 2 (e.g., years of education and height)height)

Correlations also vary in strength of the relationshipCorrelations also vary in strength of the relationship-1 to 1-1 to 1

Page 13: How is psychology different from philosophy?

Interpreting Interpreting CorrelationsCorrelations

Fig. 1.5

Page 14: How is psychology different from philosophy?

Correlation Take Home Correlation Take Home Line:Line:

Correlation does NOT imply causation!

Page 15: How is psychology different from philosophy?

What are the Goals of What are the Goals of Psychology as a Science?Psychology as a Science?

Attempts to:Attempts to:1. Describe behavior1. Describe behaviorHow is he acting?How is he acting?2. Explain behavior2. Explain behaviorWhy is he acting this way?Why is he acting this way?3. Predict behavior3. Predict behaviorWill this child be a serial killer?Will this child be a serial killer?4. Control behavior4. Control behaviorCan I keep others/myself from killing?Can I keep others/myself from killing? Uses scientific method, not common Uses scientific method, not common

sense. sense.

Page 16: How is psychology different from philosophy?

ScienceScience vs. vs. Common Common SenseSense

Objective data collection

Reliance on evidence

Systematic observation

Subjective data collection

Ignores counterevidence

Hit or miss observation

Page 17: How is psychology different from philosophy?

Stanley Milgram’s Stanley Milgram’s Obedience StudyObedience Study

1963 social psychology experiment, 1963 social psychology experiment, subjects thought they were shocking subjects thought they were shocking another person to promote “learning”another person to promote “learning”

Many subjects delivered high level Many subjects delivered high level shocks and were upset when they later shocks and were upset when they later learned the true nature of the learned the true nature of the experimentexperiment

This study, This study, and other factorsand other factors, led to , led to much more stringent APA research much more stringent APA research guidelines guidelines

Page 18: How is psychology different from philosophy?

Ethical Issues in Ethical Issues in ResearchResearch

Respecting the rights of human Respecting the rights of human research participants involves:research participants involves: Informed consentInformed consent is an explanation of a is an explanation of a

study and the responsibilities of study and the responsibilities of experimenter and participant.experimenter and participant.

ConfidentialityConfidentiality of study information must of study information must be maintained.be maintained.

DebriefingDebriefing refers to explaining the research refers to explaining the research process to the participants at the end of the process to the participants at the end of the study.study.

DeceptionDeception involving participants must involving participants must be justified.be justified.

Animal research must be justified and Animal research must be justified and must minimize discomfort and painmust minimize discomfort and pain..

Page 19: How is psychology different from philosophy?

Modern Psychology Modern Psychology ViewsViews

• Psychoanalytic viewPsychoanalytic view emphasizes the emphasizes the unconscious mindunconscious mind

• BehaviorismBehaviorism focuses on objective and focuses on objective and measurable behaviorsmeasurable behaviors

• Humanistic psychologyHumanistic psychology emphasizes the emphasizes the inner-self and the importance of inner-self and the importance of subjective feelingssubjective feelings

• Cognitive psychologyCognitive psychology focuses on mental focuses on mental function and reasoningfunction and reasoning

Page 20: How is psychology different from philosophy?

Modern Psychology Modern Psychology ViewsViews

• PsychobiologyPsychobiology views behavior as views behavior as reflecting brain processesreflecting brain processes

• Evolutionary psychologyEvolutionary psychology asserts asserts that certain behavioral that certain behavioral characteristics are subject to characteristics are subject to natural selectionnatural selection

• Cultural psychologyCultural psychology examines the examines the influence of culture and ethnic influence of culture and ethnic practice on people’s behaviorpractice on people’s behavior

Page 21: How is psychology different from philosophy?

Take Home ConceptsTake Home Concepts HypothesisHypothesis What type of study?What type of study?

experimental, correlational, naturalistic experimental, correlational, naturalistic observation, case studyobservation, case study

Independent variable(s) (IV)Independent variable(s) (IV) Dependent variable(s) (DV)Dependent variable(s) (DV) Control groupControl group Were participants randomly sampledWere participants randomly sampled and assigned?and assigned? Ethical concernsEthical concerns Potential experimenter and participant biasPotential experimenter and participant bias