How did we come to the ideas of

23
18 May, 2003 QuarkNet 1 How did we come to the ideas of quarks, strings? Myron Bander U.C. Irvine

description

How did we come to the ideas of. quarks , strings?. Myron Bander U.C. Irvine. Lots of data. Arcane rules correlating the data. More economical set of rules. Model. Explanation from more fundamental principles. Model. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of How did we come to the ideas of

Page 1: How did we come to the ideas of

18 May, 2003 QuarkNet 1

How did we come to the ideas of

quarks, strings?

Myron BanderU.C. Irvine

Page 2: How did we come to the ideas of

18 May, 2003 QuarkNet 2

How do we come up with any ideas in physics?

Lots of data.Arcane rules correlating the data.More economical set of rules.Model.Explanation from more fundamental principles.Model.Is the the model consistent, consistent with experiment? Is it predictive?If yes! Theory!

Fundamental particles.Too many.Introduce constituents.Too many.Go back two steps.

stumble on them

molecules to atoms to

electron and nuclei toproton, neutron, electron to

quarks to?

Page 3: How did we come to the ideas of

18 May, 2003 QuarkNet 3

Particles:

] ( )[ charge msymb l asso

Spin:

Quantum Mechanics

Spin=0, 1/2, 1, 3/2, ….

Page 4: How did we come to the ideas of

18 May, 2003 QuarkNet 4

Spin-0

Spin-1/2

Elementary Particle Zoo circa 1960:

Page 5: How did we come to the ideas of

18 May, 2003 QuarkNet 5

Resonances:

Spin-1

Spin-3/2

Page 6: How did we come to the ideas of

18 May, 2003 QuarkNet 6

Horizontal: Isospin back to 1930’s

Challenge: Find a symmetry for the

whole group.

Many attempts(1957-1961)

1961M. Gell-Mann,Y. Ne’eman:

(flavor) SU(3) symmetry

Symmetries:

Page 7: How did we come to the ideas of

18 May, 2003 QuarkNet 7

SU(3) Symmetry(Cartan, ~1900):

Allowed groups: 1, 3, 6, 8, 10, . . .

o oo

o o o o o

oo o

o o oo o o o

Octet

Decuplet

Page 8: How did we come to the ideas of

18 May, 2003 QuarkNet 8

OK

Comparison with known (1961) particles:

Page 9: How did we come to the ideas of

18 May, 2003 QuarkNet 9

Predictions:

)547(0 MeV

)1672( MeV

…many more borne out prediction.

Page 10: How did we come to the ideas of

18 May, 2003 QuarkNet 10

What about the 3?

2/3 1/3

1/3

u d

s

spin 1/2 ..can build up ALL known particles out of these:

0

0

( ) ( )

( ) ( , ) ( )

p uud n udd

ud uu dd du

……

Get a reasonable picture of many properties of nucleons and mesons --- particle chemistry.

Page 11: How did we come to the ideas of

18 May, 2003 QuarkNet 11

Are the 3’s real?

…just mathematics, just mathematics …

…charge 1/3, 2/3 ?

real particles are in 8’s, 10’s (eight-fold-way)

1964: maybe the 3’s are real Gell-Mann, Zweig

quarks

Page 12: How did we come to the ideas of

18 May, 2003 QuarkNet 12

Two flies in the ointment …

Where are the quarks?Pauli Exclusion Principle

Page 13: How did we come to the ideas of

18 May, 2003 QuarkNet 13

Where are the quarks?

Search for in: old rocks, sea shells, lunar rocks, …..

Try to producethem in accelerators:

less than one part in 2210

less than one part in 1210

Page 14: How did we come to the ideas of

18 May, 2003 QuarkNet 14

Pauli Exclusion Principle:

Hydrogen Helium

Lithium Beryllium

No two electronswith the same spin

can occupy the same orbit.

Page 15: How did we come to the ideas of

18 May, 2003 QuarkNet 15

extended to quarks:

…no two identical quarks with the same spin can be in the same orbit….

what about:

O.W Greenberg, Gell-Mann

2/3 2 /3 2 /3( , , )u u u

1/3 1/3 1/3( , , )s s s

Page 16: How did we come to the ideas of

18 May, 2003 QuarkNet 16

color: (+flavor)

2/3 1/3

1/3

u d

s

2/3 1/3

1/3

u d

s

2/3 1/3

1/3

u d

s

2/ /33 2 32/( , , )u uu 1/3 1/31/3( , , )s s s

Page 17: How did we come to the ideas of

18 May, 2003 QuarkNet 17

Confinement:

Forces between quarks:

bungee chordno force

confined

?

glue(on)

pull too far

Page 18: How did we come to the ideas of

18 May, 2003 QuarkNet 18

e

e

eee

e

e

e

hadrons u

u

d

d

q

q

2qQ 2 2 2[(2 / 3) (1/ 3) (1/ 3) ]R (3?)X

(2 / 3) (3?)X

Test in electron-positron annihilation:

Page 19: How did we come to the ideas of

18 May, 2003 QuarkNet 19

R=2

R=3 1/3

c quarkthreshold

b quarkthreshold

2133

3223

to date: 6 quarks

Page 20: How did we come to the ideas of

18 May, 2003 QuarkNet 20

Other tests and consequences:

0

Inelastic electron proton scatteringQuantum Chromo Dynamics

Off by a factor of 3 without color.

“And since these things are so, it is necessary to think that in all the objects that are compound there exist many things of al sorts,

and germs of all objects, having all sorts of forms and colors and flavors”.

Anaxagoras (5th century BC)

Firs

t evi

d enc

e fo

r q u

ark -

like

subs

truc

t ure

Page 21: How did we come to the ideas of

18 May, 2003 QuarkNet 21

Strings:

• Veneziano Model• Dual Resonance Model• ‘bungee chords’ } 1970

elementary particles behave likevibrating strings

(studied for a long time).

Page 22: How did we come to the ideas of

18 May, 2003 QuarkNet 22

Classical and Quantum Strings:

Strings consistent with the theory of relativity: Nambu, Goto OK

Strings consistent with the theory of relativity and with quantum mechanics

..number of dimensions, unwanted particles

Page 23: How did we come to the ideas of

18 May, 2003 QuarkNet 23

String theory maybe a 21st century theory, requiring 21st century mathematics, that wasaccidentally discovered in the 20th century.

Ed Witten

Theory Of Everything:

1980: …extra dimensions, unwanted particlesmay fit into a theory of gravity

TOE

….still major problems.