‘Housing as a Means, not an End?’ Reconceptualising ‘Housing Quality’ through Wellbeing...
-
Upload
beatrice-webb -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of ‘Housing as a Means, not an End?’ Reconceptualising ‘Housing Quality’ through Wellbeing...
‘Housing as a Means, not an End?’ Reconceptualising ‘Housing Quality’
through Wellbeing Research
Adele Irving Research Fellow, Department of Social
Sciences, Northumbria University
Key Research Questions
• What is the relationship between residential environments and wellbeing?– What is ‘wellbeing’? – What do we mean by the term ‘residential
environment’? • What are the qualities of a residential
environment that promote wellbeing?• What are the implications of this for current
conceptualisations of ‘housing quality’?
The Concept of Wellbeing
• Multi-dimensional construct. • The state of people’s life conditions.• Subjective wellbeing Vs Objective
wellbeing • Advanced conceptualisations recognise
the importance of both informational spaces.
• Methodological pluralism.
Residential Environments • Two spatial scales– House, Neighbourhood
• Three dimensions – Physical, Psychological, Social
• Multiple attributes • Scales, dimensions and attributes exist
interdependently. • Exist in dynamic relationship with the psycho-
social qualities of the person.
Relationship between Housing and Wellbeing
• Life Satisfaction Studies– Housing quality regarded as a key domain of global
assessments of subjective wellbeing. • Residential Satisfaction Studies– Residential satisfaction considered a proxy indicator for
wellbeing. – Over 100 objective and subjective attributes found to
affect assessments of residential satisfaction.• Residential Quality Investigations – Physical, psychological and social conditions found to
intersect with multiple domains of wellbeing in complex ways.
Housing Quality• Theoretically under-developed. • Definitions dominated by a focus on physical conditions.
– Limited evidence of positive impact of physical improvements to wellbeing or user perspectives on quality.
– Housing quality is individualistic and context-specific.– Ignore the lived experience of home and importance of
psychological and social factors that affect wellbeing. • ’The field has been limited in advancing because it lacks a theoretical
framework for a multi-faceted notion of residential quality that fully embraces the importance of the lived experience of housing for wellbeing’ (Harrison, 2004).
• More advanced conceptualisation – Inequalities, Choice, Control, Identity, Social Support.
Empirical Research
• HMOs in Tyne and Wear.• Qualitative interviews (20 stakeholders, 20-30 HMO residents).– Peer-led approach.• Auto-photography and solicited diaries?• Are HMOs residential environments that promote or diminish
wellbeing?– Nature of the environment (Physical, Psychological and
Social).– Intersection with experiences of wellbeing (Objective and
Subjective).– Mediating factors (Duration, life histories, demographic
variables). • Implications for housing quality.
Emerging Findings • Properties typically occupied by men, of all ages. • Word of mouth most common entry route. • Experiences of multiple exclusion are common.• Move on often voluntary. • Poor property conditions, insecurity, instability, unorthodox
management practices, residents with typically high level needs.
• Negative impacts on objective wellbeing – health, addictions, employment, social networks.
• Negative impact on life satisfaction. • Psychological and social conditions most problematic for
residents. • Mediating factors – duration, of residence, personal resilience.