Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values);...

63
Search for + βˆ’ β†’ ,, using data above + βˆ’ CM energy ~4 GeV 1 Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , ChangZheng Yuan 1 , Xingtao Huang Shandong university IHEP 1 2019.3.13

Transcript of Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values);...

Page 1: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

Search for 𝒆+π’†βˆ’ β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸŽ,π’„πŸ,π’„πŸ using data above 𝒆+π’†βˆ’ CM energy ~4 GeV

1

Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , ChangZheng Yuan1 , Xingtao Huang

Shandong universityIHEP1

2019.3.13

Page 2: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

2

β—†Motivation

β€’ We hope use 𝑒+π‘’βˆ’ β†’ π›Ύπœ’π‘π‘— to give more information about Y states ;

β€’ E1 radiative transitions from the higher-mass charmonium states are especially interesting. For example : we can proof if ψ(4160) is 2D state

β€’ Some work before this study;(CPC 39,041001) (PhysRevD.92.012011);

Phys. Rev. D 72, 054026

Page 3: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

3

Section I 𝒆+π’†βˆ’ β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ,π’„πŸ

Page 4: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

4

β—†DATA Set

β€’ Boss version boss703

β€’ DATA

21 energy points XYZ data

β€’ Signal MC

𝑒+π‘’βˆ’ β†’ π‘Œ(4260) β†’ π›Ύπœ’π‘1,2 P2GC1/P2GC2

πœ’π‘1 β†’ 𝛾J/πœ“ AV2GV

πœ’π‘2 β†’ 𝛾J/πœ“ T2GV

C.M 𝒔(MeV) L(pb-1οΌ‰

4009 4007.6 482.0

4180 4173.0 3189.0

4190 4189.3 521.9

4200 4199.6 523.7

4210 4209.7 511.2

4220 4218.8 508.2

4230 4226.3 1047.3

4237 4235.8 508.9

4246 4243.9 532.7

4260 4258.0 825.7

4270 4266.9 529.3

4360 4358.3 539.8

4420 4415.6 1028.9

4600 4599.5 566.9

C.M 𝒔(MeV) L(pb-1οΌ‰

4090 4085.5 52.8

4280 4277.8 174.5

4310 4307.9 45.1

4390 4387.4 55.6

4470 4467.1 111.1

4530 4427.1 112.1

4575 4574.5 48.9

Named DataSet I : DataSet II:

Page 5: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

5

β—† Event Selection

β€’ Initial selection:

➒ Charged track:N=2

➒ photon :good photons>=2;

➒ e , μ selection :

➒ The two photon candidates with the largest energies are retained;

Page 6: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

6

β€’ Further selection:

➒ Clearly πœ‚π½/πœ“ evnets, let M(𝛾𝛾) < 0.52 || M(𝛾𝛾) > 0.58 GeV;

β€’ After above selection,the inclusiveMC study show the dominant backgrounds come from Bhabha events.

β—† Event Selection for 𝒆+π’†βˆ’ channel

M(𝜸𝜸)@4180 DATA M(πœΈπ‘³π‘±/𝝍) >3.3GeV Signal MC M(πœΈπ‘³π‘±/𝝍) >3.3GeV

Page 7: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

7

β—†Suppress Bhabha events in 𝒆+π’†βˆ’ channel

β€’ Let Cos𝑒+𝛾𝐻>-0.9&& Cosπ‘’βˆ’π›Ύπ» >-0.9&&Cos𝑒+𝛾𝐿 <0.9&& Cosπ‘’βˆ’π›ΎπΏ <0.9 ;β€’ |Cos 𝛾𝐻 |<0.8 to remove Bhabha events;

Page 8: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

8

β€’ Further selection:

➒ Clearly πœ‚π½/πœ“ evnets, let M(𝛾𝛾) < 0.52 || M(𝛾𝛾) > 0.58 GeV;➒ Clearly πœ‹0 background, let | M(𝛾𝛾) –M(πœ‹0 )|>0.015GeV;

β€’ After above selection, the inclusiveMC study show the dominant backgrounds come from𝒆+π’†βˆ’ β†’ (π’πœΈ)𝝁+πβˆ’;

β—† Event Selection for 𝝁+πβˆ’ channel

Signal MCM(𝜸𝜸)@4180 DATA M(πœΈπ‘³π‘±/𝝍) >3.3GeV

Page 9: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

9

➒ Let |Cos 𝛾𝐻 |<0.8 to suppress dimu events;

β—†Suppress dimu events in 𝝁+πβˆ’ channel

Page 10: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

10

β—†Chisq4c cut

Chisq4c<40

➒ In πŒπ’„πŸ, πŒπ’„πŸ region:

Page 11: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

11

β—†M(πœΈπ‘³π‘±/𝝍) distribution@4180

β€’ Clearly, there are πœ’π‘1,2 events.

➒ After above cut:

Page 12: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

12

πœ’π‘1 MC

Scatter Plot of MC

β—†Photons distribution @4009

➒ Obviously, some πœ’π‘2 decay to 𝛾HJ/πœ“ at 4009 energy point. To πœ’π‘1 MC, also there is an overlap between the two photons distributions .so we decide to use two photons to search signal.

πœ’π‘2 MC

Page 13: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

13

β—†Photons distribution @4180

πœ’π‘1 MC

Scatter Plot of MC

➒ Obviously, the distribution of two photons is essentially without overlap,andalmost all πœ’π‘1,2 decay to low energy photon . So we use low energy photon to search signal

πœ’π‘2 MC

Page 14: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

14

β—†Signal extraction(DataSet I)

➒ For dataset I, We use fit method;

Fit Method

β€’ As analyzed above , we use both of the two photons to search signal at 4009 (2D- Fit), and use the low energy photon to search signal at others energy points.

β€’ Fit 𝑒+π‘’βˆ’ and πœ‡+πœ‡βˆ’ two channel Simultaneously.

β€’ Fit Shape:➒ @4009Signal use signal MC M(𝛾𝐿𝐽/πœ“) and M(𝛾𝐻𝐽/πœ“) 2-D shape ;Background use dimu or bhabha MC M(𝛾𝐿𝐽/πœ“) and M(𝛾𝐻𝐽/πœ“) 2-D shape;

➒ others Signal use signal MC M(𝛾𝐿𝐽/πœ“) fit to dataBackground 2-order Chebychev

Page 15: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

15

β—†Fit result @4009 (2-D simultaneously fit)

M(𝛾𝐻𝐽/πœ“)

M(𝛾𝐿𝐽/πœ“)

πœ‡+πœ‡βˆ’ 𝑒+π‘’βˆ’ combine

Page 16: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

16

β—†Fit result @4180 (simultaneously fit)

πœ‡+πœ‡βˆ’ 𝑒+π‘’βˆ’ combine

Page 17: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

17

➒ Using six xyz data to fill in large gaps between somehigh-statistic energy points , For dataset II,we use count method:

β€’ Define signal region: πœ’π‘1(3.49,3.53) πœ’π‘2(3.54,3.58) ,note the number of events as n;

β€’ Define sideband region (3.42,3.46) (3.6,3.64),note the number of events as b;

β€’ Statistical error:Suppose n and b follow Poisson distribution;

β—†Signal extraction(DataSet II)

C.M N_c1 N_c2 b

4090 2 0 7

4280 10 5 20

4310 2 4 3

4390 3 3 4

4470 8 0 6

4530 2 2 3

4575 1 0 1

Page 18: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

18

β—†Cross Section and lineshape of 𝒆+π’†βˆ’ β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ,π’„πŸ

➒ Firstly, we use πœ“ 4160 lineshape to get radiation correction factor;

β€’ Using follow fumula measure cross section:

➒ Fit to 𝒆+π’†βˆ’ β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ,π’„πŸ cross section:

β€’ Fit Method(likelihood Method): Define likelihood fuction:

@4180 We suppose the number of events follow Gaussion distribution; @ others We suppose the number of events follow possion distribution;

β„’ =ΰ·‘

i=1

𝐺(𝜎, 𝑁𝑒π‘₯𝑝)ΰ·‘

𝑖

𝑃(𝑁fit , 𝑁𝑒π‘₯𝑝)

Page 19: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

19

β—†The line shape of 𝒆+π’†βˆ’ β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ,π’„πŸ(Model I)

➒ Fit fuction(two coherent Breit-Wigner functions), because of the very similar line-shape ,we give a simultaneously(decay from same resonenceοΌ‰ fit:

πœŽπ‘‘π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘ π‘  = BW1+ π΅π‘Š2π‘’π‘–πœ™2

➒ Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values(For the first time , we use πœ“(4160) line-shape to get radiative correction factor)

β€’ 𝒆+π’†βˆ’ β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ (1+𝛿) βˆ— 𝑒𝑓𝑓 only πœ‡+πœ‡βˆ’

Page 20: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

20

𝒆+π’†βˆ’ β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ

𝒆+π’†βˆ’ β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ

β—†The line shape of 𝒆+π’†βˆ’ β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ,π’„πŸ(Model I-2-BW)

➒ Parameters➒ Fit result

Parameters I

M(R1) 3866.4Β± 326.6

Ξ“π‘‘π‘œπ‘‘(𝑅1) 523.1 Β± 87.9

Γ𝑒𝑒ℬ(𝑅1β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ)

2.8 Β± 0.7

Γ𝑒𝑒ℬ(𝑅1β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ)

4.2 Β± 0.7

M(R2) 4225.6 Β± 2.7

Ξ“π‘‘π‘œπ‘‘(𝑅2) 28.5 Β± 5.4

Γ𝑒𝑒ℬ(𝑅2β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ)

0.094 Β± 0.006

Γ𝑒𝑒ℬ(𝑅2β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ)

0.015 Β± 0.006

πœ™1(πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ) 79.2Β±0.3

πœ™2(πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ) 343.1Β±0.2

Page 21: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

21

β—†The line shape of 𝒆+π’†βˆ’ β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ,π’„πŸ(Model I-2-BW)

➒ Cross section 𝒆+π’†βˆ’ β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ(Data Set I)

𝒔 L(pb-1) 𝝐_𝒆𝒆 𝝐_𝒖𝒖 1+𝜹 πˆπ’…π’“π’†π’”π’”(𝒆𝒆)πˆπ’…π’“π’†π’”π’”(𝝁𝝁) Sig

4.0076 482.0 0.196 0.325 0.943 πŸ’. πŸβˆ’πŸ.πŸ“+πŸ‘.𝟎 πŸ“. πŸβˆ’πŸ.πŸ”

+𝟏.πŸ– 4.1𝝈

4.1783 3194.5 0.184 0.308 0.972 𝟐. πŸ—βˆ’πŸ.𝟎+𝟏.𝟏 πŸ‘. πŸ“βˆ’πŸŽ.πŸ”

+𝟎.πŸ” 7.6𝝈

4.1888 522.5 0.188 0.319 0.941 𝟎. πŸ“βˆ’πŸ.𝟐+𝟐.πŸ” πŸ’. πŸ•βˆ’πŸ.πŸ’

+𝟏.πŸ” 3.9𝝈

4.1989 524.6 0.196 0.329 0.898 𝟏. πŸ‘βˆ’πŸ.πŸ—+𝟐.πŸ‘ 𝟏. πŸ•βˆ’πŸ.𝟏

+𝟏.πŸ‘ 3.1𝝈

4.2092 518.1 0.201 0.338 0.839 𝟏. πŸ–βˆ’πŸ.πŸ“+𝟐.πŸ— 𝟏. πŸ•βˆ’πŸ.𝟏

+𝟏.πŸ’ -

4.2187 514.3 0.213 0.356 0.789 βˆ’πŸ. πŸβˆ’πŸ.𝟏+𝟐.πŸ“ 𝟏. πŸ‘βˆ’πŸ.𝟎

+𝟏.𝟐 -

4226.3 1047.3 0.212 0.360 0.819 βˆ’πŸ. πŸ•βˆ’πŸ.𝟐+𝟏.πŸ’ 𝟎. πŸβˆ’πŸŽ.πŸ“

+𝟎.πŸ” -

4.2357 530.6 0.204 0.347 0.970 βˆ’πŸŽ. πŸ’βˆ’πŸ.πŸ•+𝟐.𝟎 βˆ’πŸŽ.πŸβˆ’πŸŽ.πŸ”

+𝟎.πŸ• -

4.2438 537.4 0.188 0.316 1.127 𝟐. πŸ’βˆ’πŸ.πŸ—+𝟐.𝟐 βˆ’πŸ’.πŸ”βˆ’πŸ.πŸ’

+𝟏.πŸ“ -

4.258 825.7 0.164 0.275 1.291 πŸ‘. πŸ—βˆ’πŸ.πŸ•+𝟏.πŸ— 𝟏. πŸ‘βˆ’πŸŽ.πŸ”

+𝟎.πŸ• -

4.2668 529.3 0.152 0.258 1.336 𝟏. πŸŽβˆ’πŸ.πŸ“+𝟏.πŸ— 𝟎. πŸ•βˆ’πŸŽ.πŸ—

+𝟏.𝟏 -

4.3583 539.8 0.133 0.231 1.379 βˆ’πŸŽ. πŸβˆ’πŸ.πŸ–+𝟐.𝟏 𝟎. πŸ–βˆ’πŸŽ.πŸ•

+𝟎.πŸ— -

4.4156 1028.9 0.129 0.223 1.400 βˆ’πŸŽ. πŸ‘βˆ’πŸ.𝟏+𝟏.πŸ‘ 𝟐. πŸβˆ’πŸŽ.πŸ•

+𝟎.πŸ– -

4.5995 566.9 0.114 0.204 1.520 βˆ’πŸŽ. πŸβˆ’πŸ.πŸ”+𝟐.𝟎 𝟏. πŸ’βˆ’πŸŽ.πŸ•

+𝟎.πŸ— -

Page 22: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

22

β—†The line shape of 𝒆+π’†βˆ’ β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ,π’„πŸ(Model I-2-BW)

➒ Cross section 𝒆+π’†βˆ’ β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ(Data Set II)

𝒔 L(pb-1) 𝝐 1+𝜹 πˆπ’…π’“π’†π’”π’”

4.0855 52.8 0.238 0.990 βˆ’πŸ‘. πŸŽβˆ’πŸ‘.πŸ–+πŸ“.πŸ”

4.2778 174.5 0.180 1.356 πŸŽβˆ’πŸ.πŸ‘+𝟐.πŸ—

4.3079 45.1 0.174 1.369 𝟏. πŸβˆ’πŸ‘.𝟐+πŸ“.πŸ’

4.3874 55.6 0.170 1.384 𝟏. πŸ—βˆ’πŸ‘.πŸ’+πŸ“.𝟐

4.4671 111.1 0.163 1.428 πŸ’. πŸ–βˆ’πŸ.πŸ–+πŸ‘.πŸ”

4.4271 112.1 0.155 1.470 𝟎. πŸ“βˆ’πŸ.πŸ’+𝟐.πŸ‘

4.5745 48.9 0.154 1.503 𝟏. πŸβˆ’πŸ.πŸ–+πŸ‘.πŸ–

Page 23: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

23

β—†The line shape of 𝒆+π’†βˆ’ β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ,π’„πŸ(Model I-2-BW)

➒ Cross section 𝒆+π’†βˆ’ β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ(Data Set I)

𝒔 L(pb-1) 𝝐_𝒆𝒆 𝝐_𝒖𝒖 1+𝜹 πˆπ’…π’“π’†π’”π’”(𝒆𝒆)πˆπ’…π’“π’†π’”π’”(𝝁𝝁) Sig

4.0076 482.0 0.182 0.297 0.959 πŸπŸ‘. πŸβˆ’πŸ“.πŸ‘+πŸ”.𝟏 πŸ“. πŸ‘βˆ’πŸ.πŸ’

+𝟐.πŸ– 3.2𝝈

4.1783 3194.5 0.139 0.225 1.292 πŸ’. πŸ•βˆ’πŸ.πŸ–+𝟏.πŸ— πŸ’. πŸβˆ’πŸŽ.πŸ—

+𝟏.𝟎 5.4𝝈

4.1888 522.5 0.130 0.218 1.357 πŸ‘. πŸ•βˆ’πŸ’.𝟏+πŸ’.πŸ• 𝟐. πŸ–βˆ’πŸ.πŸ•

+𝟐.𝟎 -

4.1989 524.6 0.128 0.216 1.337 πŸ—. πŸ’βˆ’πŸ’.πŸ•+πŸ“.πŸ’ πŸ‘. πŸβˆ’πŸ.𝟏

+𝟐.πŸ” -

4.2092 518.1 0.148 0.249 1.069 πŸ—. πŸ•βˆ’πŸ“.πŸ–+πŸ”.πŸ“ 𝟏. πŸ•βˆ’πŸ.πŸ–

+𝟐.πŸ‘ -

4.2187 514.3 0.182 0.313 0.811 βˆ’πŸŽ. πŸ–βˆ’πŸ“.𝟏+πŸ“.πŸ– πŸ’. πŸ•βˆ’πŸ.𝟏

+πŸ‘.πŸ” -

4226.3 1047.3 0.202 0.338 0.749 βˆ’πŸ. πŸ‘βˆ’πŸ.πŸ”+𝟐.πŸ— βˆ’πŸŽ.πŸ–βˆ’πŸŽ.πŸ—

+𝟏.𝟏 -

4.2357 530.6 0.202 0.337 0.809 πŸ“. πŸ•βˆ’πŸ.𝟏+𝟐.πŸ— βˆ’πŸ.πŸ–βˆ’πŸ.𝟏

+𝟏.𝟐 -

4.2438 537.4 0.195 0.331 0.877 πŸ’. πŸ”βˆ’πŸ.πŸ”+πŸ’.𝟐 βˆ’πŸ.πŸβˆ’πŸ.πŸ”

+𝟏.πŸ— -

4.258 825.7 0.186 0.316 0.964 𝟐. πŸ“βˆ’πŸ‘.𝟎+πŸ‘.πŸ’ 𝟐. πŸ’βˆ’πŸ.πŸ’

+𝟏.πŸ” -

4.2668 529.3 0.177 0.299 1.001 πŸ“. πŸŽβˆ’πŸ‘.πŸ–+πŸ’.πŸ’ βˆ’πŸ‘.πŸ–βˆ’πŸ.πŸ”

+𝟏.πŸ• -

4.3583 539.8 0.149 0.251 1.167 𝟏. πŸ—βˆ’πŸ’.𝟎+πŸ’.πŸ” 𝟐. πŸ–βˆ’πŸ.πŸ•

+𝟐.𝟏 -

4.4156 1028.9 0.138 0.236 1.231 𝟏. πŸ‘βˆ’πŸ.πŸ”+πŸ‘.𝟎 πŸ’. πŸŽβˆ’πŸ.πŸ‘

+𝟏.πŸ“ 3.1𝝈

4.5995 566.9 0.117 0.208 1.380 βˆ’πŸ‘. πŸ”βˆ’πŸ.πŸ“+πŸ‘.𝟏 𝟎. πŸ•βˆ’πŸŽ.πŸ—

+𝟏.πŸ‘ -

Page 24: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

24

β—†The line shape of 𝒆+π’†βˆ’ β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ,π’„πŸ(Model I-2-BW)

➒ Cross section 𝒆+π’†βˆ’ β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ(Data Set II)

𝒔 L(pb-1) 𝝐 1+𝜹 πˆπ’…π’“π’†π’”π’”

4.0855 52.8 0.205 1.037 βˆ’πŸπŸ–. πŸβˆ’πŸ”.πŸ‘+πŸ—.𝟐

4.2778 174.5 0.213 1.038 βˆ’πŸ’. πŸ‘βˆ’πŸ‘.𝟎+πŸ‘.πŸ–

4.3079 45.1 0.196 1.099 πŸ—. πŸŽβˆ’πŸ”.πŸ—+𝟏𝟎.𝟐

4.3874 55.6 0.178 1.189 πŸ‘. πŸβˆ’πŸ“.πŸ•+πŸ–.πŸ•

4.4671 111.1 0.166 1.273 βˆ’πŸ”. πŸ”βˆ’πŸ.πŸ‘+πŸ‘.πŸ“

4.4271 112.1 0.157 1.321 𝟎. πŸ–βˆ’πŸ.πŸ’+πŸ’.𝟎

4.5745 48.9 0.152 1.361 βˆ’πŸ“. πŸ•βˆ’πŸ.πŸ”+πŸ’.πŸ”

Page 25: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

25

➒ Fit fuction: Suppose the line shape determined by πœ“ 4040 and πœ“ 4160 in 4~4.18GeV,we use(simultaneously fit ):

πœŽπ‘‘π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘ π‘  = π΅π‘Š πœ“ 4040 + π΅π‘Š πœ“ 4160 π‘’π‘–πœ™1 + π΅π‘Š(𝑅1)π‘’π‘–πœ™22;

➒ Fix πœ“ 4040 andπœ“ 4160 mass and width (PDG values);

➒ Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values (For the first time , we use πœ“(4160) line-shape to get radiative correction factor)

β€’ 𝒆+π’†βˆ’ β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ (1+𝛿) βˆ— 𝑒𝑓𝑓 only mumu

β—†The line shape of 𝒆+π’†βˆ’ β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ,π’„πŸ(Model II-3BW)

Page 26: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

26

β—†The line shape of 𝒆+π’†βˆ’ β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ,π’„πŸ

𝒆+π’†βˆ’ β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ

𝒆+π’†βˆ’ β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ

➒ Fitting result : ➒ Parameters:

Parameters I

M(πœ“ 4040 ) 4039(𝑓𝑖π‘₯𝑒𝑑)

Ξ“π‘‘π‘œπ‘‘(πœ“ 4040 ) 80(fixed)

Γ𝑒𝑒ℬ(πœ“ 4040 β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ) 0.8Β±0.3

Γ𝑒𝑒ℬ(πœ“ 4040 β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ) 1.6 Β±0.4

M(πœ“ 4160 ) 4191(fixed)

Ξ“π‘‘π‘œπ‘‘(πœ“ 4160 ) 70(fixed)

Γ𝑒𝑒ℬ(πœ“ 4160 β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ) 1.0 Β± 0.3

Γ𝑒𝑒ℬ(πœ“ 4160 β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ) 1.8 Β± 0.6

M(R2) 4244.8 Β± 6.3

Ξ“π‘‘π‘œπ‘‘(𝑅2) 83.2 Β± 14.8

Γ𝑒𝑒ℬ(𝑅2 β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ) 0.8 Β± 0.2

Γ𝑒𝑒ℬ(𝑅2 β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ) 1.5 Β± 0.8

Page 27: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

27

β—†The line shape of 𝒆+π’†βˆ’ β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ,π’„πŸ(Model II-3-BW)

➒ Cross section 𝒆+π’†βˆ’ β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ(Data Set I)

𝒔 L(pb-1) 𝝐_𝒆𝒆 𝝐_𝒖𝒖 1+𝜹 πˆπ’…π’“π’†π’”π’”(𝒆𝒆) πˆπ’…π’“π’†π’”π’”(𝝁𝝁)

4.0076 482.0 0.233 0.378 0.763 πŸ’. πŸ‘βˆ’πŸ.πŸ•+πŸ‘.𝟏 πŸ“. πŸ’βˆ’πŸ.πŸ•

+𝟏.πŸ—

4.1783 3194.5 0.220 0.375 0.778 πŸ‘. πŸβˆ’πŸ.𝟎+𝟏.𝟏 πŸ‘. πŸ“βˆ’πŸŽ.πŸ”

+𝟎.πŸ”

4.1888 522.5 0.222 0.374 0.783 𝟎. πŸ“βˆ’πŸ.πŸ‘+𝟐.πŸ” πŸ’. πŸ–βˆ’πŸ.πŸ’

+𝟏.πŸ”

4.1989 524.6 0.220 0.375 0.802 𝟏. πŸ‘βˆ’πŸ.πŸ—+𝟐.πŸ‘ πŸ‘. πŸ—βˆ’πŸ.πŸ’

+𝟏.πŸ”

4.2092 518.1 0.216 0.363 0.825 𝟏. πŸ•βˆ’πŸ.πŸ’+𝟐.πŸ• 𝟏. πŸ”βˆ’πŸ.𝟎

+𝟏.πŸ‘

4.2187 514.3 0.215 0.362 0.844 βˆ’πŸ. πŸŽβˆ’πŸ.𝟎+𝟐.πŸ‘ 𝟏. πŸβˆ’πŸŽ.πŸ—

+𝟏.𝟏

4226.3 1047.3 0.214 0.363 0.853 βˆ’πŸ. πŸ”βˆ’πŸ.𝟏+𝟏.πŸ‘ 𝟎. πŸβˆ’πŸŽ.πŸ“

+𝟎.πŸ”

4.2357 530.6 0.213 0.363 0.863 βˆ’πŸŽ. πŸ“βˆ’πŸ.πŸ–+𝟐.𝟐 βˆ’πŸŽ.πŸβˆ’πŸŽ.πŸ”

+𝟎.πŸ–

4.2438 537.4 0.214 0.349 0.875 𝟐. πŸ•βˆ’πŸ.𝟐+𝟐.πŸ“ βˆ’πŸ“.πŸ’βˆ’πŸ.πŸ–

+𝟏.πŸ•

4.258 825.7 0.207 0.347 0.917 πŸ’. πŸ‘βˆ’πŸ.πŸ—+𝟐.𝟐 𝟏. πŸ’βˆ’πŸŽ.πŸ•

+𝟎.πŸ–

4.2668 529.3 0.198 0.334 0.957 𝟏. πŸŽβˆ’πŸ.πŸ”+𝟐.𝟎 𝟎. πŸ–βˆ’πŸ.𝟎

+𝟏.𝟐

4.3583 539.8 0.122 0.210 1.577 βˆ’πŸŽ. πŸβˆ’πŸ.πŸ”+𝟐.𝟎 𝟎. πŸ–βˆ’πŸŽ.πŸ•

+𝟎.πŸ–

4.4156 1028.9 0.095 0.164 1.985 βˆ’πŸŽ. πŸ‘βˆ’πŸ.𝟏+𝟏.πŸ‘ 𝟐. πŸŽβˆ’πŸŽ.πŸ•

+𝟎.πŸ–

4.5995 566.9 0.054 0.097 3.244 βˆ’πŸŽ. πŸβˆ’πŸ.πŸ”+𝟐.𝟎 𝟏. πŸ‘βˆ’πŸŽ.πŸ•

+𝟎.πŸ—

Page 28: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

28

β—†The line shape of 𝒆+π’†βˆ’ β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ,π’„πŸ(Model II-3-BW)

➒ Cross section 𝒆+π’†βˆ’ β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ(Data Set II)

𝒔 L(pb-1) 𝝐 1+𝜹 πˆπ’…π’“π’†π’”π’”

4.0855 52.8 0.264 0.901 βˆ’πŸ. πŸ—βˆ’πŸ‘.πŸ•+πŸ“.πŸ“

4.2778 174.5 0.237 1.049 πŸŽβˆ’πŸ.πŸ‘+𝟐.πŸ—

4.3079 45.1 0.205 1.289 𝟏. πŸβˆ’πŸ‘.𝟐+πŸ“.𝟐

4.3874 55.6 0.135 2.004 𝟏. πŸ–βˆ’πŸ‘.πŸ‘+πŸ“.𝟎

4.4671 111.1 0.099 2.712 πŸ’. πŸ–βˆ’πŸ.πŸ•+πŸ‘.πŸ”

4.4271 112.1 0.089 3.240 𝟎. πŸ’βˆ’πŸ.πŸ‘:+𝟐.𝟏

4.5745 48.9 0.075 3.657 𝟏. πŸβˆ’πŸ.πŸ–+πŸ‘.πŸ–

Page 29: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

29

β—†The line shape of 𝒆+π’†βˆ’ β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ,π’„πŸ(Model II-3-BW)

➒ Cross section 𝒆+π’†βˆ’ β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ(Data Set I)

𝒔 L(pb-1) 𝝐_𝒆𝒆 𝝐_𝒖𝒖 1+𝜹 πˆπ’…π’“π’†π’”π’”(𝒆𝒆) πˆπ’…π’“π’†π’”π’”(𝝁𝝁)

4.0076 482.0 0.222 0.357 0.760 πŸπŸ‘. πŸ”βˆ’πŸ“.πŸ“+πŸ”.πŸ‘ πŸ“. πŸ”βˆ’πŸ.πŸ“

+πŸ‘.𝟎

4.1783 3194.5 0.208 0.339 0.779 πŸ“. πŸβˆ’πŸ.𝟎+𝟐.𝟏 πŸ’. πŸ•βˆ’πŸ.𝟎

+𝟏.𝟏

4.1888 522.5 0.206 0.350 0.780 πŸ’. πŸŽβˆ’πŸ’.πŸ“+πŸ“.𝟐 πŸ‘. πŸβˆ’.𝟏.πŸ–

+𝟐.𝟐

4.1989 524.6 0.209 0.349 0.797 πŸ—. πŸ•βˆ’πŸ’.πŸ—+πŸ“.πŸ” πŸ‘. πŸ’βˆ’πŸ.𝟐

+𝟐.πŸ•

4.2092 518.1 0.204 0.338 0.818 πŸ—. πŸβˆ’πŸ“.πŸ“+πŸ”.𝟐 𝟏. πŸ•βˆ’πŸ.πŸ•

+𝟐.𝟐

4.2187 514.3 0.201 0.337 0.838 βˆ’πŸŽ. πŸ•βˆ’πŸ’.πŸ“+πŸ“.𝟏 πŸ’. πŸβˆ’πŸ.𝟎

+𝟐.πŸ’

4226.3 1047.3 0.205 0.343 0.851 βˆ’πŸ. πŸβˆ’πŸ.𝟐+𝟐.πŸ“ βˆ’πŸŽ.πŸ•βˆ’πŸŽ.πŸ•

+𝟎.πŸ—

4.2357 530.6 0.203 0.335 0.864 πŸ“. πŸ‘βˆ’πŸ.𝟎+𝟐.πŸ” βˆ’πŸ.πŸ•βˆ’πŸŽ.πŸ—

+𝟏.𝟐

4.2438 537.4 0.197 0.332 0.880 πŸ’. πŸ“βˆ’πŸ‘.πŸ”+πŸ’.𝟐 βˆ’πŸ.πŸβˆ’πŸ.πŸ”

+𝟏.πŸ—

4.258 825.7 0.189 0.323 0.932 𝟐. πŸ”βˆ’πŸ‘.𝟏+πŸ‘.πŸ“ 𝟐. πŸ’βˆ’πŸ.πŸ’

+𝟏.πŸ”

4.2668 529.3 0.186 0.315 0.979 πŸ’. πŸ—βˆ’πŸ‘.πŸ•+πŸ’.πŸ‘ βˆ’πŸ‘.πŸ•βˆ’πŸ.πŸ“

+𝟏.πŸ”

4.3583 539.8 0.104 0.179 1.739 𝟏. πŸ—βˆ’πŸ‘.πŸ–+πŸ’.πŸ’ 𝟐. πŸ”βˆ’πŸ.πŸ”

+𝟏.πŸ—

4.4156 1028.9 0.075 0.135 2.263 𝟏. πŸ‘βˆ’πŸ.πŸ”+πŸ‘.𝟎 πŸ‘. πŸ–βˆ’πŸ.πŸ‘

+𝟏.πŸ“

4.5995 566.9 0.043 0.075 3.882 βˆ’πŸ‘. πŸ“βˆ’πŸ.πŸ“+πŸ‘.𝟏 𝟎. πŸ•βˆ’πŸ.𝟎

+𝟏.πŸ‘

Page 30: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

30

β—†The line shape of 𝒆+π’†βˆ’ β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ,π’„πŸ(Model II-3-BW)

➒ Cross section 𝒆+π’†βˆ’ β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ(Data Set II)

𝒔 L(pb-1) 𝝐 1+𝜹 πˆπ’…π’“π’†π’”π’”

4.0855 52.8 0.205 1.037 βˆ’πŸπŸ–. πŸβˆ’πŸ”.πŸ‘+πŸ—.𝟐

4.2778 174.5 0.213 1.038 βˆ’πŸ’. πŸ‘βˆ’πŸ‘.𝟎+πŸ‘.πŸ–

4.3079 45.1 0.196 1.099 πŸ—. πŸŽβˆ’πŸ”.πŸ—+𝟏𝟎.𝟐

4.3874 55.6 0.178 1.189 πŸ‘. πŸβˆ’πŸ“.πŸ•+πŸ–.πŸ•

4.4671 111.1 0.166 1.273 βˆ’πŸ”. πŸ”βˆ’πŸ.πŸ‘+πŸ‘.πŸ“

4.4271 112.1 0.157 1.321 𝟎. πŸ–βˆ’πŸ.πŸ’+πŸ’.𝟎

4.5745 48.9 0.152 1.361 βˆ’πŸ“. πŸ•βˆ’πŸ.πŸ”+πŸ’.πŸ”

Page 31: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

31

β—†Compare these two fit methods

β€’ βˆ’ log 𝐿 :

2-BW βˆ’ log 𝐿 =165.5 3βˆ’BW βˆ’ log 𝐿 =173.8

Can’t distinguish these two methods;

β€’ For Resonance: Consistent with each other , Also consistent with 𝒆+ π’†βˆ’ β†’ 𝝅+ π…βˆ’π‘±/𝝍 channel;

Parameters(MeVοΌ‰ 𝒆+π’†βˆ’ β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ,𝟐

M(R2) 4225.6Β±2.6

Ξ“(R2) 28.5Β±5.4

2-BW 3-BW

Parameters(MeV) 𝒆+π’†βˆ’ β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ,𝟐

M(R1) 4247.2Β±6.2

Ξ“(R1) 82.5Β±14.1

Page 32: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

32

β„’~2683.2

β„’~1533.6

β„’~2221.5

β—†Confirm the dip around 4.23GeV

Page 33: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

33

β—†Systematic uncertainty(Cross SectionοΌ‰

β€’ The luminosity : measured using Bhabha events, with uncertainty 1.0%;

β€’ Tracking efficiency : 1% is assigned to each track, 2% in total ;

β€’ branching ratios : 0.6% for each channel 𝐽/πœ“ β†’ 𝑒+π‘’βˆ’ , 𝐽/πœ“ β†’ πœ‡+πœ‡βˆ’;

β€’ branching ratios : 3.5% for πœ’π‘1 β†’ 𝛾J/πœ“, 3.6% for πœ’π‘2 β†’ 𝛾J/πœ“;

β€’ Photon efficiency: each 1%, total 2%;

β€’ Fit to M(𝛾𝐿𝐽/πœ“) :➒ Change background shape 2nd β€”> 3nd ;

➒ Fit Range-----> (3.4,3.65οΌ‰->(3.45,3.7οΌ‰πŒπ’„πŸ ~πŸ’. πŸ–% πŒπ’„πŸ ~πŸ•. 𝟐%

β€’ Kinematic fit: The difference efficiency between before and after pull correction;

πŒπ’„πŸ~𝟐. πŸ’%, πŒπ’„πŸ~𝟐. πŸ‘%

Use 4180

Page 34: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

34

β€’ Radiative correction: Take the difference νœ€ βˆ— (1 + 𝛿) between two fit models as systematic uncertainty;πœ’π‘1~2.7% πœ’π‘2~1% @4180

β€’ Total systematic uncertainty : 𝑒+π‘’βˆ’ β†’ π›Ύπœ’π‘1 ~ 7.5% ;𝑒+π‘’βˆ’ β†’ π›Ύπœ’π‘2 ~ 8.9%;

β—†Systematic uncertainty (Cross Section)

Page 35: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

35

β—†Systematic uncertainty(Resonance Y(4220)οΌ‰

β€’ The CMS energies of all dataset: 1MeV for mass mesurement;

β€’ The difference of Two models(width and mass );

Parameters(MeV) 𝒆+π’†βˆ’ β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ,𝟐

M(Y(4220)) 4225.6 Β± 2.7 Β±20.2

Ξ“π‘‘π‘œπ‘‘(π‘Œ(4220)) 28.5 Β± 5.4 Β±54.7

Page 36: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

36

β—†Upper Limit for (significance <3𝝈)

β€’ To evaluate the upper limits of cross section at 90% C.L. :Define likelihood fuction:

β€’ 𝑁0 is the fixed number of signal events;

β€’ 𝐺 𝑁0, 𝑁0𝜎 is Gauss function, 𝜎 is systematic uncertainty ;

β€’ The upper limit on the cross section is calculated with following formula:

β„’(𝑁0) = ࢱ𝐺 𝑁0, 𝑁0𝜎 βˆ— β„’(𝑁) 𝑑𝑁

πœŽπ‘π‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘›π‘’π‘

=𝑁𝑒𝑝

β„’ βˆ™ ℬ βˆ™ πœ– βˆ™ (1 + 𝛿) βˆ™ (1 + 𝛿𝑉𝑃)

Page 37: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

37

β—†Upper Limit @4230

β€’ After consider to system uncertainty, we give the number of signal upper limit at 90% confidence level:

β€’ Total systematic uncertainty : 𝑒+π‘’βˆ’ β†’ π›Ύπœ’π‘1 ~ 8.5% ;𝑒+π‘’βˆ’ β†’ π›Ύπœ’π‘2 ~ 15.8%;

𝑒+π‘’βˆ’ β†’ π›Ύπœ’π‘1 𝑒+π‘’βˆ’ β†’ π›Ύπœ’π‘2

πœŽπ‘π‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘›π‘’π‘

< 0.8pb πœŽπ‘π‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘›π‘’π‘

< 1.4pb

Page 38: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

38

β—†Upper Limit (For <3𝝈)

β€’ After consider to system uncertainty, we give the number of signal upper limit at 90% confidence level:

𝑒+π‘’βˆ’ β†’ π›Ύπœ’π‘1 𝑒+π‘’βˆ’ β†’ π›Ύπœ’π‘2

C.M Sys error(%) Upper Limit(pb)

4210 8.6 2.8

4220 10.8 1.8

4230 8.5 0.8

4237 10.3 1.3

4246 18.2 0.9

4260 13.5 2.2

4270 10.7 2.4

4360 8.1 1.6

4420 8.1 2.0

4600 7.3 2.24

C.M Sys error(%) Upper Limit(pb)

4190 12.1 4.1

4200 9.7 5.7

4210 9.6 5.1

4220 13.5 6.3

4230 15.8 1.4

4237 11.9 1.4

4246 8.8 4.0

4260 8.9 3.1

4270 9.4 2.1

4360 10.8 4.7

4600 9.0 1.9

Page 39: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

39

Section II 𝒆+π’†βˆ’ β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸŽ

Page 40: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

40

β—†DATA Set

β€’ Boss version boss703

β€’ DATA

XYZ data

C.M 𝒔(MeV) L(pb-1οΌ‰

4009 4007.6 482.0

4180 4173.0 3189.0

4190 4189.3 521.9

4200 4199.6 523.7

4210 4209.7 511.2

4220 4218.8 508.2

4230 4226.3 1047.3

4237 4235.8 508.9

4246 4243.9 532.7

4260 4258.0 825.7

4270 4266.9 529.3

4360 4358.3 539.8

4420 4415.6 1028.9

4600 4599.5 566.9

DataSet :

Page 41: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

41

β—†MC Samples for πŒπ’„πŸŽ β†’ 𝑲+π‘²βˆ’ 𝝅+π…βˆ’/ 𝝅+π…βˆ’ 𝝅+π…βˆ’

β€’ In PDG , πŒπ’„πŸŽ π’„π’‚π’π’Žπ’‚π’Šπ’π’π’š π’…π’†π’„π’‚π’š 𝒕𝒐 𝑲+π‘²βˆ’ 𝝅+π…βˆ’ , through the following channel:𝝅+π…βˆ’ 𝝅+π…βˆ’

πœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’ πœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’

𝐾+πΎβˆ’ πœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’

Page 42: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

42

β—†MC Samples for πŒπ’„πŸŽ β†’ 𝑲+π‘²βˆ’ 𝝅+π…βˆ’/ 𝝅+π…βˆ’ 𝝅+π…βˆ’

β€’ Signal MC 𝑒+π‘’βˆ’ β†’ π‘Œ(4260) β†’ π›Ύπœ’π‘0 P2GC0

➒ πœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’ πœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’

1. πœ’π‘0 β†’ πœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’ πœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’ ; PHSP

2. πœ’π‘0 β†’ 𝜌0πœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’ ;

3. πœ’π‘0 β†’ 𝑓0(980)𝑓0(980);

➒ 𝐾+πΎβˆ’ πœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’

1.πœ’π‘0 β†’ 𝑲+π‘²βˆ’πœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’ ; PHSP

2. πœ’π‘0 β†’ 𝐾0βˆ—(1430)0𝐾0

βˆ—(1430)0;

3. πœ’π‘0 β†’ 𝐾0βˆ—(1430)0𝐾2

βˆ—(1430)0+c.c. ;4. πœ’π‘0 β†’ 𝐾1(1270)

+ +c.c.;5. πœ’π‘0 β†’ 𝐾1(1400)

+ +c.c.;6. πœ’π‘0 β†’ 𝑓0(980)𝑓0(2200);7. πœ’π‘0 β†’ 𝑓0(1370)𝑓0(1710);8. πœ’π‘0 β†’ ΰ΄₯πΎβˆ—(892)0πœ‹βˆ’ 𝐾++c.c.;9. πœ’π‘0 β†’ ΰ΄₯πΎβˆ—(892)0 πΎβˆ— (892)0;

Page 43: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

43

β€’ Initial selection:➒ Charged tracks:

N=4➒ photon :

good photon>=1;➒ PID:

K: Prob(K)>Prob(πœ‹),Prob(K)>0.001πœ‹: Prob(πœ‹)>Prob(𝐾),Prob(πœ‹)>0.001

➒ Retain the photon with the large energy➒ 4C Kinematic fit:

Ο‡2 < 30 πœ’π‘0 β†’ 𝐾+πΎβˆ’ πœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’

Ο‡2 < 30 πœ’π‘0 β†’ πœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’ πœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’

β—† Event Selection

πœ’π‘0 β†’ 𝐾+πΎβˆ’ πœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’ πœ’π‘0 β†’ πœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’ πœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’

Page 44: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

44

β—†Background study in 𝑲+π‘²βˆ’ 𝝅+π…βˆ’ mode

β€’ background events mainly come from:

1. 𝑒+π‘’βˆ’ β†’ (𝑛)𝛾𝐼𝑆𝑅𝐾+πΎβˆ’ πœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’;

2. 𝑒+π‘’βˆ’ β†’ π›ΎπΌπ‘†π‘…πΎβˆ—ΰ΄₯πΎβˆ—;

3. 𝑒+π‘’βˆ’ β†’ (𝑛)π›ΎπΌπ‘†π‘…πΎβˆ’ πœ‹βˆ’πΎβˆ—+c.c.;

4. include πœ™ β†’ 𝐾+πΎβˆ’ background;5. include πœ‚β€² β†’ π›ΎπœŒ0(𝜌0 β†’ πœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’)background;6. include 𝜌0 β†’ πœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’ background;

β€’ For πœ™ β†’ 𝐾+πΎβˆ’ background in M(𝐾+πΎβˆ’ πœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’)∈ [3.2,3.6]:

β€’ M(𝐾+πΎβˆ’)>1.05 GeV

Page 45: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

45

β—†Background study in 𝑲+π‘²βˆ’ 𝝅+π…βˆ’ mode

β€’ πœ‚β€² background in M(𝐾+πΎβˆ’ πœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’)∈ [3.2,3.6] :

β€’ background events mainly come from:

1. 𝑒+π‘’βˆ’ β†’ (𝑛)𝛾𝐼𝑆𝑅𝐾+πΎβˆ’ πœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’;

2. 𝑒+π‘’βˆ’ β†’ π›ΎπΌπ‘†π‘…πΎβˆ—ΰ΄₯πΎβˆ—;

3. 𝑒+π‘’βˆ’ β†’ (𝑛)π›ΎπΌπ‘†π‘…πΎβˆ’ πœ‹βˆ’πΎβˆ—+c.c.;

4. include πœ™ β†’ 𝐾+πΎβˆ’ background;5. include πœ‚β€² β†’ π›ΎπœŒ0(𝜌0 β†’ πœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’)background;6. include 𝜌0 β†’ πœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’ background;

𝑴 πœΈπ…+π…βˆ’ > 𝟎. πŸ—πŸ•

Page 46: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

46

β—†Background study in 𝝅+π…βˆ’ 𝝅+π…βˆ’ mode

β€’ All combinations of π›Ύπœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’ pairs in M(πœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’ πœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’)∈ [3.2,3.6]

β€’ M(π›Ύπœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’_hh)

β€’ background events mainly come from: 1. 𝑒+π‘’βˆ’ β†’ (𝑛)π›ΎπΌπ‘†π‘…πœ‹

+πœ‹βˆ’πœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’;2. 𝑒+π‘’βˆ’ β†’ (𝑛)π›ΎπΌπ‘†π‘…πœ‹

+πœ‹βˆ’πœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’;3. include 𝜌0 β†’ πœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’ background;4. include πœ‚β€² β†’ π›Ύπœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’ background;

β€’ M(π›Ύπœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’_lh) β€’ M(π›Ύπœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’_ll)

|M(π›Ύπœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’)-M(πœ‚β€²)|>0.01GeV

Page 47: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

47

β—†Fit to M(𝝅+π…βˆ’ 𝝅+π…βˆ’) and M(π’Œ+π’Œβˆ’ 𝝅+π…βˆ’)

β€’ Fit Method: Fit two channel simultaneously;β€’ MC shape + 2nd polynomial;

πœ’π‘0 β†’ πœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’ πœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’πœ’π‘0 β†’ 𝐾+πΎβˆ’ πœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’

Page 48: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

48

β—†Fit to M(𝝅+π…βˆ’ 𝝅+π…βˆ’) and M(π’Œ+π’Œβˆ’ 𝝅+π…βˆ’)

β€’ Fit Method: Fit two channel simultaneously;β€’ MC shape + 2nd polynomial;

πœ’π‘0 β†’ πœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’ πœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’πœ’π‘0 β†’ 𝐾+πΎβˆ’ πœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’

Page 49: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

49

β—†Systematic uncertainty

β€’ The luminosity : measured using Bhabha events, with uncertainty 1.0%;

β€’ Tracking efficiency : 1% is assigned to each track, 4% in total ;

β€’ branching ratios : 8% for πœ’π‘0 β†’ π‘˜+π‘˜βˆ’ πœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’, 8% for πœ’π‘0 β†’ πœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’ πœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’;

β€’ PID: ,1.0% per kaon or pion ~ 4%;

β€’ Kinematic fit: The difference efficiency between before and after pull correction;

πœ’π‘0 β†’ π‘˜+π‘˜βˆ’ πœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’ ~6%, πœ’π‘0 β†’ πœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’ πœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’ ~2%;Use 4180

β€’ Radiative correction:use 𝑒+π‘’βˆ’ β†’ π›Ύπœ’π‘1 line shape, take the difference νœ€ βˆ— (1 + 𝛿)between 2-bw and 3-bw model as systematic uncertainty; ~2.7% ~1%

β€’ @4180 Total systematic uncertainty : πœ’π‘0 β†’ π‘˜+π‘˜βˆ’ πœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’ ~11.8% ;πœ’π‘0 β†’ πœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’ πœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’~10.9%;

Page 50: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

50

β—†Upper Limit

β€’ To evaluate the upper limits of cross section at 90% C.L. :Define likelihood fuction:

β€’ 𝑁0 is the fixed number of signal events;

β€’ 𝐺 𝑁0, 𝑁0𝜎 is Gauss function, 𝜎 is systematic uncertainty ;

β€’ The upper limit on the cross section is calculated with following formula:

β„’(𝑁0) = ࢱ𝐺 𝑁0, 𝑁0𝜎 βˆ— β„’(𝑁) 𝑑𝑁

πœŽπ‘π‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘›π‘’π‘

=𝑁𝑒𝑝

β„’ βˆ™ ℬ βˆ™ πœ– βˆ™ (1 + 𝛿) βˆ™ (1 + 𝛿𝑉𝑃)

Page 51: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

51

Upper limit @4180

β€’ Suppose 𝑒+π‘’βˆ’ β†’ π›Ύπœ’π‘0 follow 𝑒+π‘’βˆ’ β†’ π›Ύπœ’π‘1β€² line shape (P19), we generate signal MC samples ;

β€’ Similarly, After consider to systematic uncertainty,we give the number of signal upper limit at 90% confidence level:

β€’ πœŽπ‘π‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘›π‘’π‘ <2.4pb;

Page 52: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

52

β—†Summary

β€’ Using data above 𝑒+π‘’βˆ’ CM energy ~4 GeV, we observed 𝑒+π‘’βˆ’ β†’ π›Ύπœ’π‘1,𝑐2at 4180, evidence for 𝑒+π‘’βˆ’ β†’ π›Ύπœ’π‘1 at 4009@4190@4200,evidence for 𝑒+π‘’βˆ’ β†’ π›Ύπœ’π‘2 at 4009@4420;

β€’ Branch ratio(4180) about ℬ(𝑒+π‘’βˆ’ β†’ π›Ύπœ’π‘1/ 𝑒+π‘’βˆ’ β†’ π›Ύπœ’π‘2)β‰ˆ 0.767βˆ’0.242+0.258, there is a big

difference from theoretical prediction about πœ“(4160) E1 radiative transitions ;

β€’ Both 𝑒+π‘’βˆ’ β†’ π›Ύπœ’π‘1 and 𝑒+π‘’βˆ’ β†’ π›Ύπœ’π‘2 show there are a dip around 4230, which might be due to the interference of the Y(4220) resonance;

β€’ Using πœ’π‘0 β†’ 𝐾+πΎβˆ’ πœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’/ πœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’ πœ‹+πœ‹βˆ’ ,we don`t observe 𝑒+π‘’βˆ’ β†’ π›Ύπœ’π‘0 signal, upper limit of born cross sections are given;

Thanks!

Page 53: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

53

Back Up

Page 54: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

54

β—†MC for πŒπ’„πŸŽ β†’ 𝑲+π‘²βˆ’ 𝝅+π…βˆ’/ 𝝅+π…βˆ’ 𝝅+π…βˆ’

β€’ Decay card:

𝝅+π…βˆ’ 𝝅+π…βˆ’ 𝑲+π‘²βˆ’ 𝝅+π…βˆ’

Page 55: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

55

Scan data

Page 56: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

56

Fit result @4180&4190&4200

πœ‡+πœ‡βˆ’ 𝑒+π‘’βˆ’ combine

Page 57: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

57

Fit result @4210&4220&4230

πœ‡+πœ‡βˆ’ 𝑒+π‘’βˆ’

combine

Page 58: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

58

Fit result @4237&4246&4260

πœ‡+πœ‡βˆ’ 𝑒+π‘’βˆ’ combine

Page 59: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

59

Fit result @4270&4280&4360

πœ‡+πœ‡βˆ’ 𝑒+π‘’βˆ’ combine

Page 60: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

60

Fit result @4420&4600

πœ‡+πœ‡βˆ’ 𝑒+π‘’βˆ’

combine

Page 61: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

61

βˆ† βˆ’ log 𝐿 = 85.116Ndf=6Sig>10

Significance test

β€’ 𝒆+π’†βˆ’ β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ

β€’ 𝒆+π’†βˆ’ β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ

βˆ† βˆ’ log 𝐿 = 46.906Ndf=5Sig>10

Page 62: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

62

β—†Compare these two fit methods

β€’ βˆ’ log 𝐿 :2-BW βˆ’ log 𝐿 =165.5 3βˆ’BW βˆ’ log 𝐿 =173.8

Can’t distinguish these two methods;

β€’ For Resonance: Consistent with each other , Also consistent with 𝒆+ π’†βˆ’ β†’ 𝝅+ π…βˆ’π‘±/𝝍 channel;

Parameters(MeVοΌ‰ 𝒆+π’†βˆ’ β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ,𝟐

M(R2) 4225.6Β±2.6

Ξ“(R2) 28.5Β±5.4

2-BW 3-BW

Parameters(MeV) 𝒆+π’†βˆ’ β†’ πœΈπŒπ’„πŸ,𝟐

M(R1) 4247.2Β±6.2

Ξ“(R1) 82.5Β±14.1

𝒆+ π’†βˆ’ β†’ 𝝅+ π…βˆ’π‘±/𝝍

Page 63: Houbing Jiang , Qiyun Li , Ke Li , Zhiqing Liu , …...Fix 4040and 4160 mass and width (PDG values); Three times iteration of the radiative correction procedure to get converge values

63

β—†MC for πŒπ’„πŸŽ β†’ 𝑲+π‘²βˆ’ 𝝅+π…βˆ’/ 𝝅+π…βˆ’ 𝝅+π…βˆ’

β€’ Decay card:

𝝅+π…βˆ’ 𝝅+π…βˆ’ 𝑲+π‘²βˆ’ 𝝅+π…βˆ’