Hope: Not as fragile as we think

28
Hope: Not as fragile as we think KYLE P. EDMONDS, MD ASSISTANT CLINICAL PROFESSOR DORIS A. HOWELL PALLIATIVE CARE SERVICE UCSD HEALTH SCIENCES

description

An in-depth look at hope in medicine drawn from linguistic research with patients & families. Concluding with the concept that hope is much more than medical hope for cure, it is a feature of being human that serves as a powerful coping mechanism.

Transcript of Hope: Not as fragile as we think

Page 1: Hope: Not as fragile as we think

Hope:Not as fragile as we think

KYLE P. EDMONDS, MD ASSISTANT CLINICAL PROFESSOR DORIS A . HOWELL PALLIATIVE CARE SERVICEUCSD HEALTH SCIENCES

Page 2: Hope: Not as fragile as we think

Summary

Hope is much more than medical hope for cure, it is a feature of being human that serves as a powerful

coping mechanism.

Page 3: Hope: Not as fragile as we think

Illness JourneyCRISIS

CRISIS

CRISIS

Peace of Mind

Page 4: Hope: Not as fragile as we think

The Provider’s World

Provider

ExperiencesPopulation

Data

Patient Data

Ambivale-nce

BeliefsChosen Role

Professional Norms

Education

Assump-tions

Page 5: Hope: Not as fragile as we think

The Patient’s World

Patient

Data

Cues

Framing

Ambival-ence

HistoryBeliefs

Coping Style

Trust in Provider

Chosen Role

Page 6: Hope: Not as fragile as we think

Acknowledging the Overlap

Elements to Negotiate

Provider Perspective

Patient Perspective

Page 7: Hope: Not as fragile as we think

Elements to Negotiate

Control

Meaning

Hope

Optimism

Page 8: Hope: Not as fragile as we think

The Power of Optimism

Thoughts influence outcomes◦ Optimism◦ Avoidance◦ Prognostication◦ Miracles

Page 9: Hope: Not as fragile as we think

“Hope”: The Word

•A “short-hand” term

•Objective v. Subjective

•Noun v. Verb

•Cultural Pressures

Page 10: Hope: Not as fragile as we think

“Hope”: The Noun• Limited to medicine

• “No hope”

• Negative future

• Absolutes

• Person• Subject to• Biological

• Focus on Death

Adapted from Table 1: Eliott & Olver, 2006.

Page 11: Hope: Not as fragile as we think

“Hope” in Medicine

Eliott & Olver, 2002.

Page 12: Hope: Not as fragile as we think

“Hope” in Medicine

•“Realistic”• Balanced / adjusted to

“truth”•Measuring words• Fragile

Olsman et al., 2014.

Page 13: Hope: Not as fragile as we think

“Hope”: The Verb• More than medicine

• “I hope”

• Positive future

• Possibilities

• Patient• The subject of• Relatedness

•Focus on Life

Adapted from Table 1: Eliott & Olver, 2006.

Page 14: Hope: Not as fragile as we think

Patient’s “Hope”

Jacobson et al., 2013.

Page 15: Hope: Not as fragile as we think

Patients’ “Hope”

“…some patients may hold that ‘there is no hope’ yet conclude that ‘one can always hope.’”

Eliott & Olver, 2002.

Page 16: Hope: Not as fragile as we think

“Hope”: Resilient

•Beyond medical definition

•Words have power

•Window to patient goals

Page 17: Hope: Not as fragile as we think

Acknowledging the Overlap

Elements to Negotiate

Provider Perspective

Patient Perspective

Page 18: Hope: Not as fragile as we think

Small Groups: “Sarah”• 58yo mother of three with metastatic colorectal CA•Admitted with recurrent SBO (being medically

managed) and pain out of control• You broach the concept of hospice with her

•“Oh no, doctor I still have HOPE to get stronger and have more chemo…•“I want to do EVERYTHING possible!”

Page 19: Hope: Not as fragile as we think

•Affective

•Cognitive

•Spiritual

•Family

Meaning Making: “Do Everything”

Quill et al., 2009.

Page 20: Hope: Not as fragile as we think

In Words

•“Hoping for the best and planning for the worst”

•Align with patient

•Explore & reframe “everything”

Page 21: Hope: Not as fragile as we think

Communication In Action: Participation

Brown et al., 2004.

Page 22: Hope: Not as fragile as we think

Communication In Action: Anxiety

Page 23: Hope: Not as fragile as we think

Communication in Action: Outcomes

Influences to Coping◦ Challenge is Understood◦ Resources to Cope◦ Demands are Worthy of

Investment

Page 24: Hope: Not as fragile as we think

Communication In Action: Palliative Consultation

More accurate prognostic understanding1

◦ Addressed QOL2

◦ Focus on unique patient2 ◦ Contained more pessimistic

cues2

1. Temel et al., 2011.2. Gramling et al., 2012.

Page 25: Hope: Not as fragile as we think

Summary

Hope is much more than medical hope for cure, it is a feature of being human that serves as a powerful

coping mechanism.

Kyle P. Edmonds, MD [email protected]: 619.471.9424

Page 26: Hope: Not as fragile as we think

References Barnes S et al. (2012). Enhancing patient-professional communication about end-of-life issues in life-limiting conditions: A critical review of the literature. J Pain Sympt Mgmt. 44(6): 866-879. Botti S & SS Iyengar (2004). The psychological pleasure and pain of choosing: when people prefer choosing at the cost of subsequent satisfaction. J Personal Soc Psychol 87(3):312–26. Boyd EA, Lo B, Evans LR, Malvar G, Apatira L, Luce JM & DB White (2010). “It’s not just what the doctor tells me:” Factors that influence surrogate decision-makers’ perceptions of prognosis.

Crit Care Med. 38: 1270-1275. Braddock CH, Edwards KA, Hasenberg NM, Laidley TL & W Levinson (1999). Informed decision making in outpatient practice: Time to get back to the basics. JAMA. 282(24): 2313-2320. Brett AS & P Jersild (2003). “Inappropriate” treatment near the end of life: Conflict between religious convictions and clinical judgement. Arch Intern Med. 163: 1645-1650. Brown RF, Butow PN, Butt DG, Moore AR & MHN Tattersall (2004). Developing ethical strategies to assist oncologists in seeking informed consent to cancer clinical trials. Soc Sci & Med. 58:

379-390. Charles C, Redko C, Whelan T, Gafni A, Reyno L (1998). Doing nothing is no choice: lay constructions of treatment decision making among women with early stage breast cancer. Soc Health

Illness. 20(1):71–95. Chochinov HM (2011). Death, time and the theory of relativity. J Pain Sympt Mgmt. In Press. Accessed: July 5, 2011. Chochinov HM, Hack T, Hassard T, Kristjanson LJ, McClement S & M Harlos (2005). Understanding the will to live in patients nearing death. Psychosomatics. 46: 7-10. Chochinov HM, Hassard T, McClement S, Hack T, Kristjanson LJ, Harlos M, Sinclair S & A Murray (2009). The landscape of distress in the terminally ill. J Pain Sympt Mgmt. 38(5): 641-649. Chochinov HM, Kristjanson LJ, Hack TF, Hassard T, McClement S & M Harlos (2006). Personality, neuroticism and coping towards the end of life. J Pain Sympt Mgmt. 32(4): 332-341. Christakis NA (1999). Death foretold: Prophecy and prognosis in medical care. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago, IL. Clayton JM, Butow PN & MHN Tattersall (2005). When and how to initiate discussion about prognosis and end-of-life issues with terminally ill patients. J Pain Sympt Mgmt. 30(2): 132-144. Clover A, Browne J, McErlain P & B Vandenberg (2004). Patient approaches to clinical conversations in the palliative care setting. J Adv Nursing. 48(4): 333-341. Cykert S et al. (2010). Factors associated with decision to undergo surgery among patients with newly diagnosed early-stage lung cancer. JAMA. 303(23):2368-2376. deHaes H & N Koedoot (2003). Patient centered decision making in palliative care treatment: A world of paradoxes. Pt Ed & Couns. 50: 43-49. de Waal, FBM (2012). The Antiquity of empathy. Science. 336: 874-876. Delvecchio Good MJ, Good BJ, Schaffer C & SE Lind (1990). American oncology and the discourse of hope. Culture, Med & Psych. 14: 59-79. Dolan, Paul, Michael Hallsworth, David Halpern, Dominic King, and Ivo Vlaev. "MINDSPACE: Influencing Behaviour through Public Policy." Scribd. Institute for Government & Cabinet Office, 2

Mar. 2009. Web. 16 Jan. 2013. Eliott J & I Oliver (2002). The discursive properties of “hope”: A qualitative analysis of cancer patients’s speech. Qual Health Res. 12: 173-193. Eliott JA & IN Oliver (2006). Hope and hoping in the talk of dying cancer patients. Soc Sci & Med. 64: 138-149. Gettellari M, Vought KJ, Butow PN & MNH Tattersall (2002). When the treatment goal is not cure: Patients equipped to make informed decisions. J Clin Onc. 20(2): 503-513. Gomes B & IJ Higginson (2006). Factors influencing death at home in terminally ill patients with cancer: Systematic review. BMJ. Doi: 10.1136/bmj.38740.614954.55. Gramling R et al. (2012). Direct observation of prognosis communication in palliative care: A descriptive study. J Pain Sympt Mgmt. Released online prior to publishing. Accessed 12/2012. Gries CJ, Engelberg RA, Kross EK, Zatzick D, Nielsen EL, Downey L & JR Curtis (2010). Predictors of symptoms of posttraumatic stress and depression in family members after patient death in

the ICU. Chest. 137(2): 280-287.

Page 27: Hope: Not as fragile as we think

References Groopman J (2007). How Doctors Think. Houghton Mifflin Company. New York, NY. Hancock K et al. (2007). Discrepant perceptions about end-of-life communication: A systematic review. J Pain Sympt Mgmt. 34(2): 190-200. Harding R et al (2008). Meeting the communication and information needs of chronic heart failure patients. J Pain Symp Mgmt. 36(2): 149-156. Heyland, D. K., Chris Frank, Dianne Groll, Deb Pinchora, Peter Dodek, Graeme Rocker, and Amiram Gafni. "Understanding Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Decision Making: Perspectives of

Seriously Ill Hospitalized Patients and Family Members." Chest 130.2 (2006): 419-28. Web. 10 Jan. 2011. Inside Compassion: Edge States, Contemplative Interventions, Neuroscience. Perf. Roshi Joan Halifax and Dr. George Chrousos. Library of Congress, 2011. Slide program. Found online

1/2013. Jacobson J, deLima Thomas J & VA Jackson (2013). Misunderstandings about prognosis: An approach for palliative care consultants when the patient does not seem to understand what

was said. Jour Pall Med. 16(1): 91-95. Johnson S (2007). Hope in terminal illness: an evolutionary concept analysis. Int J Palliat Nurs. 13: 451–459. Johnson SK, Bautista CA, Hong SY, Weissfeld & DB White. An empirical study of surrogates’ preferred level of control over value-laden life support decisions in intensive care units. Am J

Respir Crit Care Med. 183: 915-921. Kass-Bartelmes BL, Hughes R, Rutherford MK. Advance care planning: preferences for care at the end of life. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2003. Research in

Action Issue #12. AHRQ Pub No. 03-0018. Kelley, AS, Morrison RS, Wnger NS, Ettner SL & CA Sarkasian (2010). Determinants of treatment intensity for patients with serious illness: A new conceptual framework. J Pall Med. 13(7):

807-813. Kodish E & SG post (1995). Oncology and hope. J Clin Onc. 13(7): 1817-1822. Kuehlmeyer K, Borasio GD & RJ Jox (2012). How family caregivers’ medical and moral assumptions influence decision making for patients in the vegetative state: a qualitative interview

study. J Med Ethics. 38: 332-337. Lee Char SJ, Evans LR, Malvar GL & DB White (2010). A randomized trial of two methods to disclose prognosis to surrogate decision makers in intensive care units. Am J Respir Crit Care

Med. 182: 905-909. Lo B et al. (2002). Discussing religious and spiritual issues at the end of life. JAMA. 287: 749-754. Maciejewski PK & HG Prigerson (2013). Emotional numbness modifies the effect of end-of-life (EOL) discussions on EOL care. Jour Pain & Sympt Mgmt. ePub ahead of print. Accessed

1/2013. McClement SE & HM Chochinov (2008). Hope in advanced cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. 44: 1169-1174. Miller WR & S Rollnick (2002). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change. The Guilford Press. New York, NY. Morse, JM & B Doberneck (1995). Delineating the concept of hope. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 27: 277-285. Norton SA & BJ Bowers (2001). Working toward consensus: Providers’ strategies to shift patients from curative to palliative treatment choices. Research in Nursing & Health. 24: 258-269. Ok H, Marks R, Allegrante J (2008). Perceptions of health care provider communication activity among American cancer survivors and adults without cancer histories: an analysis of the

2003 Health Information Trends Survey (HINTS). J Health Commun. 13: 637e653. Olsman E, Leget C, Onwuteaka-Philipsen B & D Willems (2014). Should palliative care patient’s hope be truthful, helpful or valuble? An interpretive synthesis of literature describing

healthcare professionals’ perspectives on hope of palliative care patients. Pall Med. 28(1): 59-70.

Page 28: Hope: Not as fragile as we think

References Parker SM et al. (2007). A systematic review of prognostic/end-of-life communication with adults in the advanced stages of a life-limiting illness: Patient/caregiver preferences for the

content, style and timing of information. J Pain Sympt Mgmt. 34(1): 81-93. Poses RM, Bekes MC, Copare FJ & WE Scott (1990). What difference does two days make? The inertia of physician’s sequential prognostic judgements for critically ill patients. Med Decis

Making. 10: 6-14. Quill TE, Arnold R & AL Back (2009). Discussing treatment preferences with patients who want ‘everything.’ Ann Intern Med. 151: 345-349. Reyna VF (2008). Theories of medical decision making and health: An evidence-based approach. Med Decis Making. 28(6): 829-833. Robinson T et al. (2008). Patient-oncologist communication in advanced cancer: predictors of patient perception of prognosis. Support Care Cancer. 16:1049-1057. Slomka J (1002). The negotiation of death: Clinical decision making at the end of life. Soc Sci Med. 35(3): 251-259. Seymore JE (2000). Begotiating natural death in intensive care. Soc Sci Med. 51: 1241-1252. Shalowitz DI, Garrett-Mayer E & D Wendler (2006). The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: A systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 166: 493-497. Steinhauser KE, Christakis NA, Clipp EC, McNeilly M, McIntyre L & Tulsky JA (2000). Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians and other providers. JAMA.

284(19): 2476-2482. Suimasy DP, Astrow AB, He MK, Seils DM, Meropol NJ, Micco E & KP Weinfurt (2010). The culture of faith and hope: Patients’ justifications for their high estimations of expected therapeutic

benefit when enrolling in early phase oncology trials. Cancer. 116: 3702-3711. Tariman JD, Berry DL, Cochrane B, Doorenbos A & K Schepp (2009). Preferred and actual participation roles during health care decision making in persons with cancer: a systematic review.

Annals of Oncology. 21: 1145-1151. Temel JS et al. (2011). Longitudinal perceptions of prognosis and goals of therapy in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a randomized study of early palliative care.

J Clin Oncol. 29: 2319-2326. The A, Hek T, Koeter G & G van der Waal (2000). Collusion in doctor-patient communication about imminent death: an ethnographic study. BMJ. 321: 1376-1381. Thompson GN, Chochinov HM, Wilson KG, McPherson CJ, Chary S, O’Shea FM, Kuhl DR, Fainsinger RL, Gagnon PR & KA Macmillan (2009). Prognostic acceptance and the well-being of

patients receiving palliative care for cancer. J Clin Onc. 27(34): 5757-562. Timmermans S (1998). Resuscitation technology in the emergency department: Towards a dignified death. Soc Health & Illness. 20(2): 144-167. Wagner GJ, Riopelle D, Steckart J, Lorenz KA & KF Rosenfeld (2010). Provider communication and patient understanding of life-limiting illness and their relationship to patient communication

of treatment preferences. J Pain Sympt Mgmt. 39(3): 527-534. Waldrop DP et al. (2012). The nature and timing of family-provider communication in late-stage cancer: A qualitative study of caregivers’ experiences. J Pain Symp Mgmt. 43(2): 182-194. Weeks JC et al. (1998). Relationship Between Cancer Patients' Predictions of Prognosis and Their Treatment Preferences. JAMA. 279(21): 1709-1714. Weeks et al. (2012). Patients’ expectations about effects of chemotherapy for advanced cancer. NEJM. 367: 1616-1625. White DB, Evans LR, Bautista CA, Luce JM & B Lo (2009). Are physicians’ recommendations to limit life support beneficial or burdensome? Bringing empirical data to the debate. Am J Respir

Crit Care Med. 180: 320-325 White DB, Malvar G, Karr J, Lo B & JR Curtis (2010). Expanding the paradigm of the physician’s role in surrogate decision-making: An empirically derived framework. Crit Care Med. 38(3):

743-750. Zier LS et al. (2009). Surrogate decision maker’s responses to physicians’ predictions of medical futility. Chest. 136: 110-117. Zier LS, Sottile PD, Hong SY, Weissfeld LA & DB White. Surrogate decision makers’ interpretation of prognostic information: A mixed-methods study. Arch Intern Med. 156: 360-366.