Hometowni Map - University of Wisconsin–Eau Claire · Gore, and Nader in 1990 and 1996. The 1990...
1
Bayfield eric sorvari major: history minor: geography bayfield, wi Hometown Map Nader Elect by Counties as Percent of Total Dot Map of Frequency of Nader Vote per State 1 Dot = 70 NADER NADER as Percent of Total 0.049963% - 0.753694% 0.753695% - 1.681726% 1.681727% - 3.519719% 3.519720% - 5.170618% 5.170619% - 14.832571% Gore Elect by Counties as Percent of Total Dot Map of Frequency of Gore Vote per State 1 Dot = 450 BUSH BUSH as Percent of Total 0.018185% - 0.562363% 0.562364% - 1.231735% 1.231736% - 2.518025% 2.518026% - 6.125538% 6.125539% - 13.213754% 1 Dot = 900 GORE GORE as Percent of Total 0.065647% - 0.477149% 0.477150% - 1.093558% 1.093559% - 2.289207% 2.289208% - 5.174468% 5.174469% - 20.299886% Legend PERBUSH PERGORE PERNADER POP1996 / AREA 8.243 - 38.99 39.00 - 86.42 86.43 - 143.7 143.8 - 340.5 340.6 - 588.5 588.6 - 3703 Percent of Bush, Gore, and Nader by use of Pie Chart over 1996 Population by Area by State Bush Elect by Counties as Percent of Total Dot Map of Frequency of Bush Vote per State Percent Bush, Gore, and Nader through Bar Graph data over the Democratic Vote and Population for 1990 by State 39 PERBUSH PERGORE PERNADER DEMVOTE / POP1990 0.000000000 - 0.04274 0.04275 - 0.1192 0.1193 - 0.1986 0.1987 - 0.6135 0.6136 - 2.896 Eric Sorvari Geography 280 Bush, Gore, Nader Election Results 1990/1996 The maps illustrated here indicate voting results and subsequent patterns within the state of Wisconsin. The data was compiled from variables such as votes by Counties as Percent Totals and Frequency of voting per State through the use of dot mapping. In the three maps below, it is easily illustrated how the three candidates and their respective votes were spread throughout the state in 1990. The voting patterns tend to shift toward the southeastern portion of the state where more of the population is located due to larger cities such as Milwaukee and Madison. It is interesting to note the patterns for Ralf Nader as they are spread more evenly throughout the state, although counties such as Dane and Milwaukee show a clear concentration on third party votes. The two larger maps located to the right illustrate the Percent totals of Bush, Gore, and Nader in 1990 and 1996. The 1990 data is the Percent total through the use of bar graphs over the Democratic vote and population by State. The 1996 data is in contrast a pie chart layout over 1996 population by area by State. This map shows the relative balance between the Demographic/Republican votes, the two major parties. It also shows quite a bit of lack of support by population for our third party candidate, Ralf Nader. HWY 96 HWY 96 Fair Rd. Fair La. Bunker Hill Rd. Mill Rd. Mill Rd. Wobeck La. Old 57 Rd. Church Rd. Pike Ct. Lancaster Rd. Branch River Wetlands Branch River Wetlands County Rd. W School Rd. School Rd. Blake Rd. Blake Rd. Meadow Wedge Ct. Lilly Ct. Kennedy Circle Kennedy La. Parridge Rd. Lamar Rd. Reading La. Wobeck La. Hwy 32 Gateway Rd. Gateway Rd. Crown's Ct. Doyle La. Mills Rd. Emma La. Shetland Rd. Tulane Ct. Chester St. Limms Rd. Old Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Hwy 32 Old 97's Rt. Chester St. Tremont way Greenleaf Map of Greenleaf, Wisconsin Eric Sorvari Geography 280 The maps here represent the UW-Eau Claire fall semester of 2002 in Geography 280. They are representations of skills that our class has learned through the use of programs such as Arcmap, Arcview, Adobe Illustrator, Adobe Photoshop, and their related tools. The map to the right is a compilation of election results from 1990 and 1996. It illustrates different variables and voting patterns throughout Wisconsin. The data was first compiled through a selection of various variables in Arcmap and then customized in Adobe Illustrator to fit the theme and related maps. The hometown map was our first project and was put together in a similar manner to our election map. I located Bayfield on a large Wisconsin map from Arcmap and used that portion in Adobe Illustrator to add details to create an effective map of where I grew up. The digital photos were added in to give a personalized aspect to the project. The map of Greenleaf, Wisconsin was our last project in which we took an ariel photograph of the city and its surrounding area and modified it in Adobe Photoshop by cropping it and adding color to the black and white image. Then in Adobe Illustrator we used the pen tool to highlight county roads, interstate highways, railroads and other important features. Then by adding text we successfully created our own informative map. Eric Sorvari Geography 280 Portfolio Project Fall Semester 2002
Transcript of Hometowni Map - University of Wisconsin–Eau Claire · Gore, and Nader in 1990 and 1996. The 1990...
Bayfield
eric sorvarimajor: historyminor: geography
bayfield, wiHometown Map
Nader Elect by Countiesas Percent of Total
Dot Map of Frequency of NaderVote per State
1 Dot = 70
NADER
NADER as Percent of Total
0.049963% - 0.753694%
0.753695% - 1.681726%
1.681727% - 3.519719%
3.519720% - 5.170618%
5.170619% - 14.832571%
Gore Elect by Countiesas Percent of Total
Dot Map of Frequency of GoreVote per State
1 Dot = 450
BUSH
BUSH as Percent of Total0.018185% - 0.562363%
0.562364% - 1.231735%
1.231736% - 2.518025%
2.518026% - 6.125538%
6.125539% - 13.213754%
1 Dot = 900
GORE
GORE as Percent of Total0.065647% - 0.477149%
0.477150% - 1.093558%
1.093559% - 2.289207%
2.289208% - 5.174468%
5.174469% - 20.299886%
Legend
PERBUSH
PERGORE
PERNADER
POP1996 / AREA
8.243 - 38.99
39.00 - 86.42
86.43 - 143.7
143.8 - 340.5
340.6 - 588.5
588.6 - 3703
Percent of Bush, Gore, and Naderby use of Pie Chartover 1996 Population by Area
by State
Bush Elect by Countiesas Percent of Total
Dot Map of Frequencyof Bush Vote per State
Percent Bush, Gore, and Naderthrough Bar Graph data over
the Democratic Vote and Populationfor 1990 by State
39
PERBUSH
PERGORE
PERNADER
DEMVOTE / POP1990
0.000000000 - 0.04274
0.04275 - 0.1192
0.1193 - 0.1986
0.1987 - 0.6135
0.6136 - 2.896
Eric Sorvari Geography 280
Bush, Gore, NaderElection Results 1990/1996
The maps illustrated here indicate voting results and subsequent patterns within the state of Wisconsin. The data wascompiled from variables such as votes by Counties as Percent Totals and Frequency of voting per State through the useof dot mapping. In the three maps below, it is easily illustrated how the three candidates and their respective votes werespread throughout the state in 1990. The voting patterns tend to shift toward the southeastern portion of the state where more of the population is located due to larger cities such as Milwaukee and Madison. It is interesting to note the patternsfor Ralf Nader as they are spread more evenly throughout the state, although counties such as Dane and Milwaukee showa clear concentration on third party votes. The two larger maps located to the right illustrate the Percent totals of Bush, Gore, and Nader in 1990 and 1996. The 1990 data is the Percent total through the use of bar graphs over the Democraticvote and population by State. The 1996 data is in contrast a pie chart layout over 1996 population by area by State. This map shows the relative balance between the Demographic/Republican votes, the two major parties. It also shows quite a bit of lack of support by population for our third party candidate, Ralf Nader.
HWY 96HWY 96
Fair Rd.
Fair
La.
Bu
nke
r Hill
Rd
.
Mill Rd.Mill Rd.
Wo
bec
k La
.
Old
57
Rd
.
Church Rd.
Pike Ct.
Lancaster Rd.
Branch River Wetlands
Branch River Wetlands
Coun
ty R
d. W
School Rd.School Rd.
Bla
ke R
d.
Bla
ke R
d.
Blake Rd. East
MeadowWedge Ct.
Lilly Ct.
Kennedy Circle
Kennedy La.
Parridge Rd.
Lamar Rd.
Reading La.
Wo
bec
k La
.
Hw
y 32
Gate
way R
d.G
atew
ay R
d.
Crown's Ct.
Doyle La.
Mill
s R
d.
Emm
a La
.
Shet
lan
d R
d.
Tulane Ct.
Ch
este
r St.
Limms Rd.
Old Milwaukee, St. Paul& Pacific Railroad
Hw
y 32
Old
97'
s R
t.
Chester St.
Tremont way
Greenleaf
Map of Greenleaf, Wisconsin Eric Sorvari Geography 280
The maps here represent the UW-Eau Claire fall semester of 2002 in Geography 280. They are representations of skills that our class has learned through the use of programs such as Arcmap, Arcview, Adobe Illustrator, AdobePhotoshop, and their related tools. The map to the right is a compilation of election results from 1990 and 1996. It illustrates different variables and voting patterns throughout Wisconsin. The data was first compiled through a selection of various variables in Arcmap and then customized in Adobe Illustrator to fit the theme and related maps. The hometown map was our first project and was put together in a similar manner to our election map.I located Bayfield on a large Wisconsin map from Arcmap and used that portion in Adobe Illustrator to add detailsto create an effective map of where I grew up. The digital photos were added in to give a personalized aspect to the project. The map of Greenleaf, Wisconsin was our last project in which we took an ariel photograph of the city and its surrounding area and modified it in Adobe Photoshop by cropping it and adding color to the blackand white image. Then in Adobe Illustrator we used the pen tool to highlight county roads, interstate highways,railroads and other important features. Then by adding text we successfully created our own informative map.
Eric SorvariGeography 280Portfolio Project
Fall Semester 2002
