Hollow Section Joints in Trusses

43
Wardenier RHS Joints - Oslo Course 2009 Hollow Section Joints in Trusses Intro Joints & Behaviour

description

Hollow Section Joints in Trusses - Joints & Behaviour

Transcript of Hollow Section Joints in Trusses

Page 1: Hollow Section Joints in Trusses

Wardenier RHS Joints - Oslo Course 2009

Hollow Section Joints in Trusses

Intro Joints & Behaviour

Page 2: Hollow Section Joints in Trusses

Wardenier RHS Joints - Oslo Course 2009

Trusses

Page 3: Hollow Section Joints in Trusses

Wardenier RHS Joints - Oslo Course 2009

Most common Combinations of sections

for trusses

Brace Chord Joint

CC

RR

CR

RI

CI

Page 4: Hollow Section Joints in Trusses

Wardenier RHS Joints - Oslo Course 2009

Hollow Section Trusses

a. Warren truss

b. Pratt truss

c. Vierendeel truss

d. truss with cross braces

Warren Type : K-joints

Pratt Type : N-joints

Vierendeel Type : T-joints

Cross brace Type : KT - joints

X - joints

Page 5: Hollow Section Joints in Trusses

Wardenier RHS Joints - Oslo Course 2009

Basic Types of Joints

Page 6: Hollow Section Joints in Trusses

Wardenier RHS Joints - Oslo Course 2009

Definition of eccentricity (joint design)

Page 7: Hollow Section Joints in Trusses

Wardenier RHS Joints - Oslo Course 2009

Definition of Gap and Overlap

Page 8: Hollow Section Joints in Trusses

Wardenier RHS Joints - Oslo Course 2009

Definition of Load capacity ultimate load)

Maximum

or load at a

3%d0 or 3%b0

deformation

Page 9: Hollow Section Joints in Trusses

Wardenier RHS Joints - Oslo Course 2009

Further: Service ability criteria

•• Deformation < 1% chord width or chord diameterDeformation < 1% chord width or chord diameter

•• crack initiationcrack initiation

Page 10: Hollow Section Joints in Trusses

Wardenier RHS Joints - Oslo Course 2009

A : chord face plastification

B : chord punching shear

C : brace effective width

D : chord shear failure

E : local buckling brace

F : local buckling chord

Failure Modes

e.g. for

RHS K gap joints

Page 11: Hollow Section Joints in Trusses

Wardenier RHS Joints - Oslo Course 2009

Symbols used (e.g. for K-Joints) d

b

h

t

e

g

0

1

2

β γ θ τ

b0

h0

t0 θ2

b2 d2

h2 h1

b1 d1

θ1

t2 t1

g

+e

N1 N2

N0

1 2

0

Page 12: Hollow Section Joints in Trusses

Wardenier RHS Joints - Oslo Course 2009

For Square Hollow Sections:

T and X-joints:

K gap joints:

KT joints:

For Rectangular Hollow Sections, include rectangularity,

e.g. for K gap joints:

0

1

b

b=β

0

21

2 b

bb +=β

0

321

3b

bbb ++=β

0

2211

4b

hbhb +++=β

Joint parameters

b0

h0

t0 θ2

b2 d2

h2 h1

b1 d1

θ1

t2 t1

g

+e

N1 N2

N0

1 2

0

Page 13: Hollow Section Joints in Trusses

Wardenier RHS Joints - Oslo Course 2009

0

0

0

0

t

bor

t

d2 =γ

0b

hi=η

00

0

yfA

Nn

⋅=

0t

ti=τ

Joint parameters

b0

h0

t0 θ2

b2 d2

h2 h1

b1 d1

θ1

t2 t1

g

+e

N1 N2

N0

1 2

0

Page 14: Hollow Section Joints in Trusses

Wardenier RHS Joints - Oslo Course 2009

Truss Behaviour

• Assume pin ended Joints but only if :

- the governing elements (joints or members) have

sufficient deformation/rotation capacity

If loads between the joints: assume continuous chords

Page 15: Hollow Section Joints in Trusses

Wardenier RHS Joints - Oslo Course 2009

Truss Behaviour

For Vierendeel trusses: use moment joints

(stiffness is important)

Page 16: Hollow Section Joints in Trusses

Wardenier RHS Joints - Oslo Course 2009

General Design Aspects for Trusses

• Depth h ≅ 1/10 to 1/16 L; generally 1/15 L

• pin jointed members if critical parts (members or joints)

have sufficient rotation capacity → secondary moments can

be neglected for static design

• if possible: center lines noding

• gap joints preferred above overlap joints (tolerances)

• optimize chords, however considering joint strength

• consider the joint strength always in the conceptual design

Page 17: Hollow Section Joints in Trusses

Wardenier RHS Joints - Oslo Course 2009

- end preparation

- fitting (tolerances)

- welding

Gap joints vs Overlap joints

ggapoverlap

Page 18: Hollow Section Joints in Trusses

Wardenier RHS Joints - Oslo Course 2009

Multiplanar trusses

Page 19: Hollow Section Joints in Trusses

Wardenier RHS Joints - Oslo Course 2009

Joint strength related to that for uniplanar jointsbut additional:

- Geometrical effect

- Loading effect

(see left)

Multiplanar Truss Behaviour

Page 20: Hollow Section Joints in Trusses

Wardenier RHS Joints - Oslo Course 2009

Hollow Section Joints in Frames

Types of Joints

Page 21: Hollow Section Joints in Trusses

Wardenier RHS Joints - Oslo Course 2009

Bolted joint to a fin plate

Page 22: Hollow Section Joints in Trusses

Wardenier RHS Joints - Oslo Course 2009

Bolted joint to a T stub

Page 23: Hollow Section Joints in Trusses

Wardenier RHS Joints - Oslo Course 2009

Bolted joint to a welded I section stub

Page 24: Hollow Section Joints in Trusses

Wardenier RHS Joints - Oslo Course 2009

Single sided bolted joint

Page 25: Hollow Section Joints in Trusses

Wardenier RHS Joints - Oslo Course 2009

Welded RHS beam to column joints

Page 26: Hollow Section Joints in Trusses

Wardenier RHS Joints - Oslo Course 2009

Stiffened beam to column joints

Page 27: Hollow Section Joints in Trusses

Wardenier RHS Joints - Oslo Course 2009

Basic behaviour of Hollow Section Joints

Page 28: Hollow Section Joints in Trusses

Wardenier RHS Joints - Oslo Course 2009

• follow the forces

• identify potential failure locations

• deform the structure under the acting loads

• consider the local stiffness and the material behaviour

• identify the possible failure modes

General approach

Page 29: Hollow Section Joints in Trusses

Wardenier RHS Joints - Oslo Course 2009

Example: Plate to RHS joint

Page 30: Hollow Section Joints in Trusses

Wardenier RHS Joints - Oslo Course 2009

Example

• plate

• weld

• chord (lamellar tearing)

• chord (face plastification)

• chord (punching shear)

• chord (side wall failure) (yielding, crippling)

Possible failure locations

Page 31: Hollow Section Joints in Trusses

Wardenier RHS Joints - Oslo Course 2009

Example

Plate to RHS chord joint - plate failure

Page 32: Hollow Section Joints in Trusses

Wardenier RHS Joints - Oslo Course 2009

Example

Plate to RHS chord joint - weld failure

Weld failure should be

avoided

(yielding only possible

over a small distance)

Page 33: Hollow Section Joints in Trusses

Wardenier RHS Joints - Oslo Course 2009

Example

Plate to RHS chord joint - chord lamellar tearing

No photo for this failure mode

Page 34: Hollow Section Joints in Trusses

Wardenier RHS Joints - Oslo Course 2009

Example

Plate to RHS chord joint - other chord failure modes

chord

punching shear

side wall yielding

chord face plastification

Page 35: Hollow Section Joints in Trusses

Wardenier RHS Joints - Oslo Course 2009

Plate to RHS joint (plate failure)

Different stiffness for q1 and q2

Page 36: Hollow Section Joints in Trusses

Wardenier RHS Joints - Oslo Course 2009

Plate to RHS joint(plate failure)

Stress and resulting deformation

1. Method:

Consider the

deformations under a

uniform stress

Page 37: Hollow Section Joints in Trusses

Wardenier RHS Joints - Oslo Course 2009

Plate to RHS joint (plate failure)

Compatibility

Resulting stress

pattern in plate

Page 38: Hollow Section Joints in Trusses

Wardenier RHS Joints - Oslo Course 2009

Stress and resulting deformation for a rigid plate

2. Method:

Plate stiffness >>

stiffness RHS face

Plate to RHS joint (plate failure)

Page 39: Hollow Section Joints in Trusses

Wardenier RHS Joints - Oslo Course 2009

a: ductile →redistribution of stresses

b: brittle →failure at reaching in one

point the ultimate stress

Effect of material

Page 40: Hollow Section Joints in Trusses

Wardenier RHS Joints - Oslo Course 2009

Stress pattern at failure (material a)

Page 41: Hollow Section Joints in Trusses

Wardenier RHS Joints - Oslo Course 2009

Chord side

wall failure

Other failure modes e.g. side wall failure

Page 42: Hollow Section Joints in Trusses

Wardenier RHS Joints - Oslo Course 2009

The end of the

lectures on:

introduction into

the joint behaviour

Page 43: Hollow Section Joints in Trusses

Wardenier RHS Joints - Oslo Course 2009

IIW (2008) Relation to the Basic Types of Joints

0.5N sinθ

0.5N sinθ

θ

N

N cosθ

=

0.5N sinθ

θ

0.5N

0.5N cosθ

0.5N sinθ

θ

+

0.5N

0.5N cosθ

Example: Checking of a K joint with imbalanced brace loads