Holding Therapy Article Attachment Center

8/13/2019 Holding Therapy Article Attachment Center

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/holding-therapy-article-attachment-center 1/13

Comparative Effectiveness of Holding Therapywith Aggressive Children

Robin Myeroff PhDGary Mertlich PhD

University o f Toledo

Jim Gross MA

ABSTRACT: This study was undertaken to assess the effects of holding therapy onchildren who have a history of aggressive and delinquent behaviors. The study designwas a prospective, pre-post, quasi-experimental controlled study. The subjects were re-cruited through the Attachment Center at Evergreen, Colorado. Eligible subjects wereadopted children between the ages of 5-14 years, living in the present adopted homefor at least one year. All children had a history of aggressive and delinquent behaviors,which prompted the contact with Evergreen. Findings resulted in significant decreasein the outcome variable for the treatment group within this study.

KEY WORDS: Achenbach; Childhood Aggression; Treatment; Holding Therapy; Adop-tion; Foster Care.

Young aggressive children can commit such defiant and destructive

acts as lying, stealing, vandalism, fire setting, and running away.1

While it is well accepted that aggressive and antisocial behaviors in

childhood are related (violent, criminal outcomes),2,3,4

it is only over

the last ten years that an increase in adolescent violent acts (142%

increase in murder and manslaughter) has been identified.5 Conse-

quently, aggression in children has been posted as a major public

health concern.6

Aggressive behaviors are included under a wide variety of psychi-

atric terms ranging from attention deficit hyperactivity through oppo-sitional defiant, conduct, and attachment disorders.

7 Distribution of

these disorders is estimated to be between 2 to 16 percent of children

within the general population.7 It is not surprising that researchers

Received December 20, 1997; For Revision April 7, 1998; Accepted September 22,1998.

Address correspondence to Robin Myeroff, PhD, 3800 Park East Dr., Suite 150,Beachwood, O H 44122.

Child Psychiatry and Human Development, V o l 29 4) , Summer 999

© 1999 Human Sciences Press Inc.



Child Psychiatry and Human Development

have identified such behavioral problems as the major impetus for

children's mental health referrals. Numerous interventions have been

attempted to treat aggressive behavior8

including individual, group,residential, behavioral, and psychopharmacological measures.

9,10,1,11

However to date few interventions have been widely successful.

Recently, holding therapy, originally used with autistic children, is

now being recognized as useful with aggressive behaviors in children.

Based on attachment theory holding therapy in part attempts to re-

pair the postulated disruption that occurred in the formative years

between the infant and primary caregiver.12,13 A conceptualization of

attachment theory explains how this can occur. A fter a child experi-

ences a repeated number of parenting inconsistencies he will inter-

nalize the negative input from the primary caregiver and act this out

through abusive and aggressive behaviors toward others.

One way that holding therapy impacts on the original disrupted

cycle of attachment is by creating a representation of a healthy at-

tachment cycle for the child.14,15

This occurs in the treatment by mod-

eling the healthy attachment cycle in which the child will receive pos-

itive input from the therapist and care giver by way of eye contact,

physical holding, and cognitive restructuring. The positive input fromthe therapist and parent assists the child in attaching to the adoptive

parent which, will decrease aggression. The child can now internalize

positive input from the environment, curbing the tendency towards

destructive behavior. During the points in the session when the child

becomes activated with anger or despair the parent and/or therapist

continues to contain the child physically and assists him in cogni-

tively understanding and self regulating his emotions. This replicates

the healthy attachment cycle beginning with the child becomingaroused and the caregiver offering positive input by way of physical

holding, soothing, eye contact, and, adds in helping to articulate the

child's internal struggle. As the child begins to internalize this pro-

cess after many hours and days of intense contact with the parent

and therapist, internal reorganization begins to take place. When the

child's anger is met with love and understanding from the therapist

and caregiver, the aggression can then be libidinized with boundaries

and not leaving the child with unbound and destructive anger.16

The

containment and self-regulation of aggression is more manageable for

the child and destructiveness decreases. Simultaneously, the child in-

ternalizes the adopted mother and begins to trust her. The relation-

ship between the child and the mother begins to develop as the at-

tachment becomes increasingly more secure. This allows for the

4



Robin Myeroff Gary Mertlich and Jim Gross

development of a sense of remorse in the child, and results in a de-

crease in aggressive and delinquent behaviors.16

The shift in the child

based on the exposure to the healthy attachment cycle, allows for anincrease in secure attachment and, therefore, a decrease in aggressive

and delinquent behaviors.

Methods

Subjects

The total sample consisted of 23 subjects. Subjects were recruited from thereferral populations at the Attachment Center at Evergreen, Colorado. Crite-ria for participation included the requirement that the child's adoptive par-ents had contacted the Attachment Center at Evergreen between 1996 and1997. To be considered for treatment the child had to show evidence of de-

structive behaviors and difficulty attaching to their parents. All children werebetween the ages of 4 and 14 years at the time of contact. Every child hadexperienced at least one other type of therapeutic intervention prior to at-tending the Attachment Center under the care of a professional medical doc-tor or mental health worker. All children were living in the home at the timeof contact and returned home after treatment.

The sample consisted of 23 children, 17 males and 6 females, ranging from5 to 14 years of age. Subjects were either in the treatment or comparisongroup because of the timing and or the ability to pursue therapy during theprojected course of the study. Due to the strict inclusion criteria, only 46 ofthe treatment population of The Attachment Center at Evergreen were in-volved as subjects. The two groups were similar in terms of distribution ofage, gender, and race (Table 1). They were also similar in regard to the num-ber of pre-adoption placements as identified by the intake data.

Measure

The Child Behavior Checklist is a widely used parent report measure de-signed to assess behavior problems in children 4 to 16-years of age. The CBCLdepicts the child's behavioral pattern across both broadband (Internalizingand Externalizing) and narrowband syndromes. A higher score of either 1 or 2indicates more behavioral problems. The 2 problem scales used in this studyare aggression and delinquency. Construct validity is supported by correlatesof CBCL scales with significant associations with analogous scales on theQuay-Peterson

18 Revised Behavior Problem Checklist and the Connors

19 Par-

ent Questionnaire. Criterion-related validity is supported by the ability of theCBCL's quantitative scale scores to discriminate between referred and non-referred children after demographic effects were parceled out. T he Cronbach'sor reliability alpha range measures were .74 for delinquent behaviors and .92for aggressive behaviors for boys age 4-11 years, and .83 for delinquent be-haviors and .92 for aggressive behavior for boys age 12-18 years. The range

for girls ages 4-11 years is .73 for delinquent behaviors and .92 for aggressive

5



306 Child Psychiatry and Human Development

Table Demographic Variables

Descriptive Statistics

Categorical Variables:

Variable

Gender

Race

Pre-Adopt.

Placement

TreatmentGroup

MaleFemaleCaucasianAsianM ix1-3 years

4-6 years — 9 years10 and above

Continuous Variables:

Variable

Age

Income

Group

TreatmentComparisonTreatmentComparison

N

10

2

102

08

30

N

121112

11

83.3

16.783.316.70.0

66.7

25.00.0

8.3

Mean

8.369.163.55.92

ComparisonGroup

N

7

4

10

0 6

4 0

63.636.4

90.90.09.1

54.5

36.49.10.0

Range

(6 , 12)(6 , 11)(3,5)( 2 , 6 )

behaviors. Girls age 12-18 years shows .92 for delinquent behaviors and .92for aggressive behaviors.

The study design was a prospective two group pre-post-design of conveni-ence.

Recruitment Procedures

Subjects were recruited based on a parent-initiated phone call to the At-tachment Center at Evergreen. A description of the therapy was offered to theparent and a series of screening questions about the child's early history andpresent level of functioning were conducted to determine the potential fortreatment. Subjects volunteered to be a part of the study based on the knowl-edge that a study was being conducted to test the effects of this holding treat-ment and that the decision to participate would not have any affect on theirfuture treatment at the Attachment Center. The comparison group for the

study was comprised of families who did not attend the Attachment Centerdue to time restraints or finances and parents who were information seeking.




Their lack of attendance was not due to the condition of the child or parent.Prior to treatment parents were mailed the CBCL for the mothers to fill out

one week prior to treatment (time 1). After the treatment was completed theparents were mailed the CBCL for the mother to fill out six weeks post treat-ment (time 2). The comparison groups were mailed the measures at the sameintervals as the treatment groups.

Independent Variable-Holding Therapy

The following description of the holding therapy conducted at Evergreen iscondensed from a procedure manual written by Levy & Orlans.

14 The treat-

ment at the Attachment Center at Evergreen is a two-week therapy modeloften referred to as a two-week intensive. The referred child, parents, andtreatment team, consisting of one therapist and the treatment foster mother,are all present for 30 hours of therapy. This breaks down to three consecutivehours of therapy daily. The 30 treatment hours are broken down to threehours per day for 10 consecutive working days. Each family entering treat-

ment at Evergreen are assigned to a therapeutic parent who houses the childfor the two weeks of treatment. This means that the interactions the parentand child have together are the three hours during the actual treatment time,weekends, and certain times during the two weeks when the parent and childhave interactions for limited amounts of time. A ll therapists and therapeuticparents are trained systematically at the Attachment Center.

The therapy consists of four basic techniques which include cognitive re-structuring, psycho-dramatic reenactment, inner child metaphor, and thera-peutic holding. The therapeutic holdings are designed to imitate the infant-nurturing position on a couch. The child lies across the therapist's lap withher head resting on a pillow. This allows for close proximity, eye contact, andphysical restriction.

Each session follows as closely as possible the session outline, which will bediscussed in an abbreviated fashion in a session-by-session format. All inter-ventions occur in sequence but may be delayed or accelerated depending onthe family dynamics and the strengths of the child. Each session begins witha meeting of all participants with the exception of the child. At this time thechild is waiting in a separate room. All sessions after the first session areconducted using the holding technique.

Session one begins with a history-taking interview and assessment of theparents and child. The parents and the child contract verbally with the treat-ment team, entering the treatment based on the mutually agreed upon tech-niques and goals for the ten days.

Session two includes rapport building between client and therapist and pro-viding a cognitive framework for the treatment. This encompasses a descrip-tion of the first year life cycle and how infants develop trust. A review of thechild's early history with both birth parents and other foster placements isreviewed in light of the trust cycle explored above. A lso included in the secondsession is a review of treatment rules and specific behaviors and changesexpected of the child.

Session three focuses on the resistance of the client and the controlling

behaviors displayed both in the therapeutic process and in the adoptive home.Validation and support are offered as the assistance of conscious connections

7



8

between past and present are verbalized and understood. The child is encour-aged to release anger, sadness, fear, or rage. The child's perceptions of herself

and the adult caregivers in her life are identified.Session four begins with the child expressing thoughts and feelings about

the therapy including the therapeutic parents. Issues of attachment and emo-tional traumas are investigated as they relate to the child's experiences inearly life. The child is assisted to correctly identify feelings and begin ver-balizing these feelings.

Session five begins with the treatment team and parents present discussing

the previous day's and evening's events. Parenting techniques and skills arereviewed in light of the therapeutic parents' report of the child's behavior. Thesecond half of the session is spent in a therapeutic hold, continuing the dis-cussion of the early history of the child with the child.

Sessions six, seven, and eight are the middle phases of treatment allowingfor a more in-depth focus on emotional aspects of the early traumatic experi-ences. Psychodramatic reenactment is utilized at this time. The treatmentteam role-plays significant people in the child's past allowing for a gradual

progression into the events of the past and the ability to confront and expresswhat is needed leading the child to an interpersonal sense of mastery. Thisalso allows for revisions of old self perceptions and fantasies about self andpast significant figures.

The inner child metaphor is also utilized during these sessions as the childis asked to visualize herself in the past and, while being held, is asked aseries of questions about that early time and how those experiences and feel-ings relate to her present relationships.

In addition to these techniques mother-child exercises are repeated manytimes including holding, covering with blankets, and feeding with a bottle.

Session nine includes exploration of any birth father issues that may bepresent. The adoptive father now holds the child, as psycho-dramatic reenact-ment is utilized to provoke and resolve these father issues. The process ofgrief and mourning is explored in relation to the many losses experienced bythese children. This process allows for cognitive restructuring through thedialogue with the role-played birth parents.

Reunification with the adoptive family occurs at this point and the childleaves to spend the night with the adoptive parents instead of the therapeuticparent.

Session ten begins with a review of the prior night and interactions arediscussed. A complete review of the entire ten sessions takes place with every-one on the treatment team including the child. Family members talked abouttheir learning experiences during this time, and a specific follow up plan isthen developed.

Results

Data analysis consisted of two-tailed independent and paired t teststo discern any between and within group significant differences. The

t test was employed in this case as opposed to analysis of variance

Child Psychiatry and Human Development



comparison groups with an independent two tailed t test (t = 3.57; df

= 18; p < .003). In a like manner t test results for pretest delin-

quency sum minus post-test delinquency sum scores also demon-

strated a significant difference between treatment and comparisongroups (t = 2.46; df = 18; p < .04). The results indicate a between

group difference on both aggression and delinquency for the compari-

son and treatment groups over the course of the study.

Discussion

Efforts to address the problem of aggression and behavioral diffi-

culties range from hospital based21,22

and community based programs.23

Because studies show that children with high rates of antisocial

behaviors are likely to continue these behaviors into adulthood,24,25

it

becomes increasingly important to find treatment that can impact

these behaviors.

24,25

Heretofore, there have been no quantitativestudies which verify the effectiveness of holding therapy. The purpose

of the present study was to investigate the relationship between hold-

ing therapy and later aggressive behaviors as compared to children

with a similar profile who did not receive holding therapy.

The significant decreases in the outcome variables for the treat-

ment group in this study may be due to the holding therapy based

upon the theory that disruption in the formative years has a critical

impact on the attachment between infant and the primary caregiver.12,13

The comparison group by contrast did not receive any intervention

and exhibited no significant changes over time for either the aggres-

sion (p = .81) or delinquent (p = .99) scores. Children with high

aggression are significantly more likely to have high delinquency

scores in the treatment and comparison groups, respectively, (treat-

Child Psychiatry and Human Development10

Table 3Statistical Analysis for Delinquency Scores

Group

Comparison

pre time 1post time2Treatment

pre time 1post time2

N

119

1211

Mean

70.37

69.89

72.8365.82

SD

8.279.64

6.74

10.89

t d f

.2 8

2.37 10

p value

.85

.04




ment group rho = .84, p = <0.001; comparison group; rho = 0.61,

p = 0.05). It may be that as one score decreases due to an effective

intervention, so will the other score.Delinquency tended to have even more of a significant decrease for

the treatment groups, (both separately and comparing the two

groups), may be because the questionnaire alluded to more of a char-

acterological component for the questions about delinquency (fire set-

ting, running away, truancy or lack of guilt) than for the questions

referring to aggression (arguing, destructive action to self or property,

temper tantrums). According to our conceptual framework the devel-

opment of the child's attachment towards the parent simultaneously

increases the capability to feel remorse and the capacity for self regu-

lation.

Suggestions fo r Further Research

Further investigation and replication are warranted in order to ex-

tend knowledge and the effects of holding therapy on the special

needs adopted population. Replicating these findings in a controlled

multimodel experimental study could provide information in order to

evaluate the effectiveness of different forms of treatment.Differences in the specific form of early abuse such as physical and

sexual abuse and neglect, along with other possible extraneous vari-

ables may offer insight into the reasons some children clearly benefit

from this treatment while others do not seem to make any progress.

Attachment therapy as it is practiced at the Attachment Center and

other facilities across the country is a controversial and provocative

treatment. Comparative research into the different forms of holdingtherapy could result in new parameters for the treatment.

Summary

This study examined the effects of attachment therapy as per-

formed by the Attachment Center at Evergreen on aggressive chil-

dren between the ages of 5 and 14 years. The hypothesis that holding

therapy will reduce aggressive behaviors in the special needs adopted

population was supported.

Significant differences in the reduction of aggression and delin-

quency scores in children who underwent a 2 week treatment pro-

gram at the Attachment Center at Evergreen were found in this

311



312

study. Delinquency scores decreased across time for the treatment

group. The comparison group, who were eligible for treatment at the

Attachment Center based on specific criteria but, did not receive anyintervention exhibited no significant changes over time for either ag-

gression or delinquency scores as reported from the Child BehaviorChecklist.

Given that childhood aggressive behaviors can become increasinglymore violent and destructive, often at the expense of others includingfamily members, animals, and peers, a strong and effective interven-tion is necessary in order to assist these individuals in decreasingboth the intensity and frequency of their aggressive behaviors. Hold-ing therapy addresses the issues of attachment, early wounding and

aggression through the breakdown of psychological defenses in the

context of the adoptive family.This finding indicates the importance of using holding therapy as

one component of an intervention for children with aggressive anddelinquent behaviors between the ages of 5 and 14 years. Further

investigation and replication are warranted in order to extend knowl-edge of holding therapy on this and other populations.

References

1. Kazdin, A.E., Siegel, T.C., & Bass, D : Cognitive problem-solving skills training andparent management training in the treatment of antisocial behavior in children. JConsult an d Clinical Psychol 60 733-747, 1992.

2. Robins, L.N: Longitudinal studies: Sturdy childhood predictors of adult antisocialbehavior. Psychological Medicine 8 611-622, 1978.

3. Garrison, S.T., & Stolberg, A.L: Modification of anger in children by affective imag-ery training. J Abnorm Child Psychol 11 115-130, 1983.4. Lochman, J.E., White, K.J., & W ayland K.K: Cognitive-behavioral assessment and

treatment with aggressive children. In P. C. Kendall Eds.) Child an d AdolescentTherapy: Cognitive-Behavioral Procedures. N ew York: Guilford Press, 1991.

5. Federal Bureau of Investigation 1993). Uniform Crime Report for the UnitedStates 1992. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.

6. Walker, B., Goodwin, N.J., & Warren, R.C: Violence: A challenge to the publichealth community. Journal National Medical Association 84 490-496, 1992.

7. American Psychiatric Association DSM-IV: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual ofMental Disorders. 4

th ed . Washington, DC : The Association, 1994.

8. Kazdin, A.E: Treatment o Antisocial Behavior in Children and Adolescents. Home-wood, IL: Dorsey Press, 1985.

9. Werry, J.S., & Wollersheim, J.P: Behavior therapy with children and adolescents: Atwenty-year overview. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 28 1-18, 1989.

10. Sanchez, L.E., Armenteros, J.L., Small, A.M., Campbell, M., & Adams P.B.: Placeboresponse in aggressive children with conduct disorder. Psychopharmacology Bulle-

tin 30 209-213, 1994.

hild Psychiatry and Human Development



Robin Myeroff Gary Mertlich and Jim Gross 313

11. Slee, P.T. Family climate and behavior in families with conduct disordered chil-dren. Child Psychiat Hum Developm 26 255-266, 1996.

12. Bowlby, J: Attachment and Loss Vol. LII: Sadness and Depression. New York: BasicBooks, 1980.13. Egeland, B, & Sroufe, A: Attachment and Early Maltreatment. Child Developm

Vol. 52: 44-52, 1981.14 . Levy, T , & Orlans, M : Intensive Short-Term Therapy with Attachment Disordered

Children. Unpublished Manuscript, 1995.15 . Myeroff, R: Comparative Effectiveness With T he Special Needs Adoptive Population.

Unpublished dissertation, Union Institute, Cincinnati, 1997.16. Barrett, T. Supporting drive fusion: Mitigating Destructive Aggression In Infants,

Toddlers And Preschoolers. J Child Anal Vol. 6, 128-151, 1995.17. Achenbach, T, & Edelbrock, C: Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist and Re-

vised Child Behavior Profile. University of Vermont, Burlington, 1983.18. Quay, H.C., & Peterson, D.R: Interim M anual for the Revised Behavior Problem

Checklist. University of Miami, Coral Gables, 1983.19. Conners, C.K: Rating Scales for use of drug studies with children. Psychophar-

macology Bulletin: Pharmacotherapy with children. Washington D C : U.S. Govern-ment Printing Office, 1973.

20. Munroe, B., & Page, E.B. Statistical Me tho ds fo r Health Care Research 2nd

ed .Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott, 1993.21. Lock, J & Strauss, G: Psychiatric hospitalization of adolescents for conduct disor-

der. Ho spital and Community P sychiatry Vol 45 (9) 925-928, 1994.22. Malone, R., Luebbert, J., Pena, A., Biesecker, K: The Overt Aggression Scale in a

study of lithium in aggressive conduct disorder. Psychopharmacology Bull Vol 30(2) 215-218, 1994.

23. Offord, D., & Bennett, K: Conduct Disorder: Long-term outcomes and interventioneffectiveness. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry: Oct. Vol 33 (8) 1069-1078,1994.

24. Robins, L., & Price, R: Adult disorders predicted by childhood conduct problems:Results from the NMH Epidemiological Attachment Area Project. Psychiatry Vol

54, 116-132, 1991.25. Loeber, R: Antisocial behavior: More enduring than Changeable? Special Section. J

Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Vol 30, 393-397, 1991.



Copyright of Child Psychiatry & Human Development is the property of Springer Science & Business Media

B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright

holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.

Holding Therapy Article Attachment Center

Documents

Transcript of Holding Therapy Article Attachment Center