HMA Design by Marshall Method
18
MENU HOT MIX DESIGN BY MARHSALL METHOD 1. DATA 2. TEST REPORT 3. FIGURE 4. AGGREGATE AGGREGATE 5. MARSHALL DESIGN CRITERIA
-
Upload
elson-kong -
Category
Documents
-
view
31 -
download
1
Transcript of HMA Design by Marshall Method
MENU
HOT MIX DESIGN BY MARHSALL METHOD
Created by: [email protected] by: [email protected]
1. DATA1. DATA
2. TEST REPORT2. TEST REPORT
3. FIGURE3. FIGURE
4. AGGREGATE AGGREGATE
4. AGGREGATE AGGREGATE
5. MARSHALL DESIGN CRITERIA
5. MARSHALL DESIGN CRITERIA
Please insert the Data
Date of sampling 2/8/2003 Pen 2.62
Date of testing 2/8/2003 2.454
Test by Deen 1.03 3
Providing Ring Factor 2.758 Max. Temp 135 3
Testing Temp. 60
Spec. No. Weight of Specimen Stability
1 5.0 1169.0 1167.8 650.7 2400 2400 112 1164.2 1164.9 647.0 2630 2630 113 1167.0 1165.1 651.0 2560 2560 12
1 5.5 1167.5 1167.5 652.4 2520 2520 112 1180.6 1180.6 661.4 2690 2690 123 1171.0 1171.0 650.9 2650 2650 13
1 6.0 1170.4 1171.0 656.7 2620 2620 132 1181.1 1181.9 664.7 2710 2710 133 1187.3 1189.0 670.9 2980 2980 12
1 6.5 1174.2 1174.7 661.6 2800 2800 122 1185.3 1186.0 667.7 2730 2730 133 1182.3 1182.9 667.7 2900 2900 14
1 7.0 1177.5 1177.9 663.0 2820 2820 142 1183.4 1183.6 665.4 2730 2730 143 1192.8 1193.3 675.7 2790 2790 15
1 7.5 1181.9 1182.3 663.3 2690 2690 162 1173.0 1173.5 660.2 2340 2340 163 1182.2 1182.7 666.1 2590 2590 14
Gsb
Gmm
Gb
oCoC
Go to Result
Asphalt Content
%
Flow inchIn Air
(SSD) gm
In Air (SSD)
gm
In Water (Dry) gm
Meas. lb
Correct lb
Go to Result
40/5060/7080/100
120/150
200/300
6
2645
MARSHALL TEST RESULTS
Date of sampling 2/8/2003 Pen 3
Date of testing 2/8/2003 2.454 2.62 eeTest by Deen 1.03 2.647 80/100
Providing Ring Factor 2.758 Max. Temp 135 0
Test Temp. 60 0
Weight of Specimen Density (gm/cc) Voids % Stability
VMA VFA
a b c d e f g h j k q r s
1 5.0 1169.0 1167.8 650.7 517.1 2.253
2.454
2400 2400 11
2 1164.2 1164.9 647.0 517.9 2.252 2630 2630 11
3 1167.0 1165.1 651.0 514.1 2.258 2560 2560 12
AVE : 2.254 8.13 18.25 55.46 2530 11
1 5.5 1167.5 1167.5 652.4 515.1 2.267
2.436
2520 2520 11
2 1180.6 1180.6 661.4 519.2 2.274 2690 2690 12
3 1171.0 1171.0 650.9 520.1 2.251 2650 2650 13
AVE : 2.264 7.07 18.34 61.44 2620.0 12
1 6.0 1170.4 1171.0 656.7 514.3 2.280
2.419
2620 2620 13
2 1181.1 1181.9 664.7 517.2 2.289 2710 2710 13
3 1187.3 1189.0 670.9 518.1 2.302 2980 2980 12
AVE : 2.290 5.31 17.83 70.19 2770.0 13
1 6.5 1174.2 1174.7 661.6 513.1 2.292
2.252
2800 2800 12
2 1185.3 1186.0 667.7 518.3 2.291 2730 2730 13
3 1182.3 1182.9 667.7 515.2 2.299 2900 2900 14
AVE : 2.294 5.16 18.14 71.53 2810.0 13
1 7.0 1177.5 1177.9 663.0 514.9 2.289
2.385
2820 2820 14
2 1183.4 1183.6 665.4 518.2 2.285 2730 2730 14
3 1192.8 1193.3 675.7 517.6 2.308 2790 2790 15
AVE : 2.294 3.80 18.57 79.55 2780.0 14
1 7.5 1181.9 1182.3 663.3 519.0 2.280
2.368
2690 2690 16
Gmm Gsb =
Gb Gse =
oC
Back to MENU oCBack to DATA
Spec. No.
Asphalt Content
%
Bulk Vol
cc kkkkk
kkk
Flow inch
In Air (SSD)
gm
In Air (Dry)
gm
In Water (SSD) gm
Bulk kkkkk kkkkk
Max (Theory)
AV/ VTM Meas. lb
Correct lb
i ccc
2
7.5
1173.0 1173.5 660.2 513.3 2.288
2.368
2340 2340 16
3 1182.2 1182.7 666.1 516.6 2.292 2590 2590 14
AVE : 2.287 3.43 19.27 82.19 2540.0 15
AC Bulk Density Stability AV VMA VFA Flow
% N lb % % % in mm
5.0 2.254 140.4 11282 2530 8.13 18.25 55.46 1.1 2.88
5.5 2.264 141.0 11683 2620 7.07 18.34 61.44 1.2 3.05
6.0 2.290 142.7 12352 2770 5.31 17.83 70.19 1.3 3.22
6.5 2.294 142.9 12530 2810 5.16 18.14 71.53 1.3 3.30
7.0 2.294 142.9 12396 2780 3.80 18.57 79.55 1.4 3.64
7.5 2.287 142.4 11326 2540 3.43 19.27 82.19 1.5 3.89
f = c-e , Bulk volume in gm
g = d/(c-e) , Bulk Density in g/cm3
i = (1-g/h)x 100 , Void in total mix (AV)
k =( j - i/ j)100 , Void filled asphalt (VFA)
Summary of Result (Go to Figure)
g/cm3 lb/ft3
h = 1/(1-b/Gse + b/Gb), Theorical maximum density (Gmm)
j = 100(1-(g(1-b))/Gsb), Void in mineral aggregate (VMA)
C41
To PRINT OUT this Test Result; PRESS CTRL + P
Back to MENU
4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0139.0
139.5
140.0
140.5
141.0
141.5
142.0
142.5
143.0
143.5
Bulk Density Vs AC
% AC
Bulk
Density (
lb/f
t3)
4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.02350
2400
2450
2500
2550
2600
2650
2700
2750
2800
2850Marshall Stability Vs AC
% AC
Sta
bili
ty (
lb)
4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
Flow Vs AC
% AC
Flo
w (
in.)
4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.01.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00 Air Void Vs AC
% AC
Air
Vo
id
4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.017.00
17.50
18.00
18.50
19.00
19.50
VMA Vs AC
% AC
% V
MA
4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.060.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
VFA Vs AC
% AC
% V
FA
4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.017.00
17.50
18.00
18.50
19.00
19.50
VMA Vs AC
% AC
% V
MA
4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.060.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
VFA Vs AC
% AC
% V
FA
% ACBulk Density 6.7
Back to Test Report
4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.02350
2400
2450
2500
2550
2600
2650
2700
2750
2800
2850Marshall Stability Vs AC
% AC
Sta
bili
ty (
lb)
4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.01.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00 Air Void Vs AC
% AC
Air
Vo
id
4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.060.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
VFA Vs AC
% AC
% V
FA
Stability 6.6Air Void 7.0
Void Filled 7.2Average 6.9
4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.060.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
VFA Vs AC
% AC
% V
FA
AGGREGATE GRADATION BY SIZE SPECIFICATION
SIEVE ANALYSIS SIZE :
Back to MENU
SINGLE TYPESINGLE TYPE
BLENDING TYPEBLENDING TYPE
Back to MENU
B97
To PRINT OUT this Result : PRESS CTRL+ P
Single Type
28.0 0 0.00 100.00 100 100 10020.0 105.9 9.29 90.71 80 - 10014.0 83.8 7.35 83.36 72 - 9310.0 157.3 13.80 69.56 58 - 825.0 80 7.02 62.54 50 - 75
2.36 20 1.75 60.79 36 - 581.18 150 13.16 47.63 30 - 52
0.600 210.3 18.45 29.18 18 - 380.300 132.3 11.61 17.58 11 - 250.150 114.7 10.06 7.52 5 - 140.075 25.4 2.23 5.29 3 - 8pan 60.3 5.29 0.00 4.22 0 4.82
1140
Back to Aggregate
BS Sieve (mm)
Weight Retained
% Retained
% Passing
% Job Standard Tolerence
0.0 0.1 1.0 10.0 100.00
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110SIEVE ANALYSIS TEST
Seive Size
Pe
rce
nta
ge
Pa
ss
ing
(%
)
Blending Aggregates
Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 Type 4
12.5 100 100.00 100.00 100 100 - 1009.5 89 100.00 100.00 100 95 - 100
4.75 3 58.00 99.00 100.00 47 - 772.36 1 10.00 81.00 99.00 52 - 701.18 1 8.00 71.00 94.00 46 - 63
0.600 1 5.00 46.00 86.00 37 - 570.300 1 4.00 26.00 68.00 24 - 390.150 1 3.00 15.00 18.00 8 - 250.075 0.1 2.20 10.00 2.50 2 - 8
Percentage Trial : Type 1 25 %Type 2 15 %Type 3 35 %Type 4 25 %
Blending Result
Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 Type 4 Combined Mid. Spec
12.5 25.00 15.00 35.00 25 100.00 100.009.5 22.25 15.00 35.00 25 97.25 97.50
4.75 0.75 8.70 34.65 25 69.10 62.002.36 0.25 1.50 28.35 24.75 54.85 61.001.18 0.25 1.20 24.85 23.5 49.80 54.50
0.600 0.25 0.75 16.10 21.5 38.60 47.000.300 0.25 0.60 9.10 17 26.95 31.500.150 0.25 0.45 5.25 4.5 10.45 16.500.075 0.025 0.33 3.50 0.625 4.48 5.00
BS Sieve (mm)
% Job Standard Tolerence
Back to Aggregate
BS Sieve (mm)
0.0 0.1 1.0 10.0 100.00
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110SIEVE ANALYSIS RESULT
Sample
Lower Limit
Upper LimitSieve Size
Pe
rce
nta
ge
Pa
ss
ing
(%
)
Back to MENU
0.0 0.1 1.0 10.0 100.00
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110SIEVE ANALYSIS RESULT
Sample
Lower Limit
Upper LimitSieve Size
Pe
rce
nta
ge
Pa
ss
ing
(%
)
B51
To PRINT OUT this Result : PRESS CTRL+ P
0.0 0.1 1.0 10.0 100.00
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110SIEVE ANALYSIS RESULT
Sample
Lower Limit
Upper LimitSieve Size
Pe
rce
nta
ge
Pa
ss
ing
(%
)
0.0 0.1 1.0 10.0 100.00
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110SIEVE ANALYSIS RESULT
Sample
Lower Limit
Upper LimitSieve Size
Pe
rce
nta
ge
Pa
ss
ing
(%
)
MARSHALL MIXTURE DESIGN CRITERIA
Traffic
Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum
35 50 75
Stability, lb(N) 750 (3333) …… 1200 (5333) …… 1800 (8000) …
8 203.2
Air Voids % 3 5 3 5 3 5
By Graphically
JKR : MARSHALL DESIGN CRITERIA
LAYER
Binder Course Wearing Course
Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum
50 75
Stability, lb(N) ≥ 500 ≥ 500
Flow (0.01cm) 20 40 20 40
Air Voids % 3 7 3 5
≥75 ≥75
Back to MENU
Marshall Method Mix
CriteriaLight (ESAL < 104) Medium (104 < ESAL < 104) Light (ESAL > 104)
Compaction No. of blow/side
Flow 0.01 inches
(0.025mm)
8 203.2
18 457.2
16 406.4
8 203.2
14 355.6
Voids in mineral Aggregate
Marshall Method Mix
Criteria
Compaction No. of blow/side
Voids in mineral Aggregate
Back to MENU
![MARSHALL MIX DESIGN METHOD FOR ASPHALTIC ... 832a February 22, 2013 (28 Pages) MARSHALL MIX DESIGN METHOD FOR ASPHALTIC CONCRETE (ASPHALT-RUBBER) [AR-AC] (An Arizona Method) 1. SCOPE](https://static.fdocuments.in/doc/165x107/5aa5df047f8b9ab4788dc1c1/marshall-mix-design-method-for-asphaltic-832a-february-22-2013-28-pages-marshall.jpg)
