HL-LHC: scope, structure and management

HL-LHC: scope, structure and management

HL-LHC internal kick-off day15 April 2011

L.Rossi @ HL kick off internal day 2

Content

• Scope• Structure• Management• Situation of CERN budget• Situation of HiLumi FP7 DS

15-04-2011


How the luminosity might evolve optimistic to 2012, then prudent: nominal

15-04-2011

0.01

0.10

1.00

10.00

100.00

1000.00

0.0E+00

2.0E+33

4.0E+33

6.0E+33

8.0E+33

1.0E+34

1.2E+3420

10

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

Inte

grat

ed lu

min

osity

[fb-1

]

Peak

Lum

inos

ity [c

m-2

s-1]

Peak lumi Int. lumi

Shut

dow

n

Shut

dow

n

Data from M. LamontGraph E. TodescoNOT yet validated in LMC

Based on 15 months LS1 now under change

L.Rossi @ HL kick off internal day 415-04-2011

0

3

6

9

12

15

0.1

1.0

10.0

100.0

1000.020

10

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

Hal

ving

tim

e (y

ears

)

Inte

grat

ed Lu

min

osity

[fb-1

]

Int. lumi Halving time

Shut

dow

n

Shut

dow

n


How the luminosity might evolve optimistic to 2012, then nominal -cont

220 inv fb by end of 2020



Lumi evolution: more otpimistic(ultimate=2xnominal) is reached

15-04-2011

If LHC performs « nominal »: the upgrade is required by the saturationIf LHC performs better, saturation is 2 years later, but radiation limits may come in earlier

In such case we may reach 320 inv. fb for end of 2020.




The goal

The main objective of HL-LHC is to implement a hardware configuration and a set of beam parameters that will allow the LHC to reach the following targets:•A peak luminosity of 5×1034 cm-2s-1 with levelling, allowing:•An integrated luminosity of 250 fb-1 per year, enabling the goal of 3000 fb-1 twelve years after the upgrade. This luminosity is more than ten times the luminosity reach of the first 10 years of the LHC lifetime.

0.E+00

2.E+34

4.E+34

6.E+34

8.E+34

1.E+35

0 2 4 6 8 10 12

Lum

inos

ity

(cm

-2s-1

)

time (hours)

Nominal

1035 - no levelling

Levelling at 5 10

35

34

0.E+00

2.E+34

4.E+34

6.E+34

8.E+34

1.E+35

0 5 10 15 20 25

Lum

inos

ity

(cm

-2 s

-1)

time (hours)

1035 - no level Level at 5 1035 34

Average no level

Average level

15-04-2011


Goal – cont.

• Levelled lumi of LLp =51034 s-1 cm-2 (not Hz cm-2)• Annual integrated luminosty: IL =250 fb-1

– More than 1 fb-1 a day

• Which is more important? I guess IL . We take Lp as guideline, not a barrier, however it is understood that this is the nominal limit.

• These goals are already questioning parameter space of Linear Collider: we need to be correct, optimist but not overoptimist

15-04-2011


• We need to have potential for Lp =10-151034 (before levelling)– Today the preferred baseline is to reach 5 1034 and then « crabbing ». But

may be we put crab at max immediately and then use another parameters.– We cannot rely only on one scheme: we need to have scheme with very

low and not small , we need to explore very high beam curent and moderate beam current, and having more than on leveling methods.

– Many actions will be needed in addition to the most visible being discussed today to reach integrated :

• Turn around time: will allow « releasing » beam current (protection)• Stops, Shutdowns, etc…

– Advanced robotics and monitoring? – Remove on surface of sensible equipments.

• To be worked out with experiments• The upgrade is « ultimate consolidation », too. I see these actions as a

« continuum » with some spike activities , the biggest being

15-04-2011


Structure• By deliverable

– Study and R&D (big part in FP7 HiLumi Design Study and Eucard(2))– Construction

• tooling&infrastructure, if needed, • components , • Assembly• Test (on surface)

– Installation, commissioning• This way external contribution are easy to evidence and to account• Also is easy to do a cost-to-completion and decision making by line management• My view is to agree at Management level the cost (M+P) and time profile, then transfer resources

(with clear control) to Department/Groups. It is their job to efficiently manage it and our job to check, to see sufferance or excess and propose transfers/integrations. Contingency at CERN level (or Project with full transparency toward management, but see US project: in this way contingency is always used)

• The cost-structure should be based on CORE-cost. This will easy in-kind contribution and make them visible.

• Next slides: quick overview, details and substructure to be discussed with various leaders of projects and systems.

15-04-2011


HL-LHC composition

WP1 Project Management and Technical Coordination

WP2 Accelerator Physics and Performance

WP3 Magnet Design

WP5 IR Collimation

WP6 Cold Powering

WP4 Crab Cavities

HiLumi LHC

WP7 Machine Protection

WP8 Collider-Experiment Interface

WP9 Cryogenics

WP10 Energy Deposition and shielding

WP11 11 tesla dipole two-in-one

WP12 Integration & (de)installation

Non-HiLumi LHC

HL-LHC Design Study

CollimationProject

Matching section and correctors

Beam Diagnostics

High Field Magnets R&D

HE-LHC Studies Hardware Commissioning

15-04-2011


HL-LHC management

CERN Council

CERN DG

Collaboration Board Scientific Advisory Board

Project Coordinator

Steering Committee

WP1 WP11

Project Office EC DG Research

WP6 to to WP7

Key:

Strategic decisions

Specific to HiLumi LHC

HiLumi LHC

management structure

extended to whole

HL-LHC Design Study

15-04-2011


R&D Design PrototypeConstruction CERN Budget Code name Bud.Code#Installtion-Commission.

1HL-LHC Proj. Mngt. and Techn.Coordin.

1.1 ManagementForm and coordinate various bodies: CB, SC,SAC,...Maintain DB of collaboration members Reporting to EU-FP7, to Collaborations and to CERN managementAnnual meetings, etc.Master PlanningBudget

1.2 Parameters and Lay-outCommittee (PLC) activitiesData Base of the the various possible HL-LHC lay-outLiaison with LHC operation and MDs

1.3 QA PlanNaming ConventionTechnical QA planRules for in-kind contributionProcedures and Reviews

1.4 SafetyRadiological impactImplementation of ALARA proceduresDefintion of equivalence among different standardsGeneral riskEnvironmental impact

1.5Liaison with Detector Uprade and LIU

Link to Detector Upgrade and LHCCLink to LIU

1.6Dissemination and Industry outreach

Publication policy and publication DBLink to TIARA, CERN-ITLO and other kTT programsScientific dissemination and communication to general public

15-04-2011


2Accelerator Physics and Performance

2.1Coordination and Communication

2.2 Optics and Lay-out2.2.1 New IR4 Optics for CC

2.2.2Chromatic aberration corrections (of insertions)

2.2.3 General Optics and Lattice (various lay-out)2.2.4 ATS studies

2.3 Particle simulation2.3.1 Monte Carlo tracking2.3.2 Simulation tools2.3.3 Correction circuits 2.3.4 Optimize Tune working pointfor HL2.3.5 Radiation and heat depostion

2.4 Intensity limitations2.4.1 Impedence studies2.4.2 Corrector circuit settings2.4.3 IBS estimate2.4.4 e-coulds effects

2.5 Beam-beam effects2.5.1 Orbit variation2.5.2 LR b-b correction by wires2.5.3 CC b-b compensation

2.6Beam parameter and Lumi optimization

2.6.1Lumi reduction by geometric factor and levelling means

2.6.2 Optimization of Lumi via beam paramerters2.6.3 Optimization of beam parameters

15-04-2011


3 Magnets for IRs


3.2 Ending Phase 1 LIT project3.2.1 MQXC Short model 2(3) 2m models Short quadrupoles 99605

SLHC-PP WP6 (CERN) 97109SLHC-PP WP6 (EU) 97184

2 short cold mass wiht 2 models Pre-series quadrupoles 99606cryostat for short cold mass Cryostats and support 99608

3.2.2 Nested correctors2 single and 1 nested assembly Correctors NIT 99610

3.2.3 Magnet Testing LIT Magnet Testing 996113.2.4 Magnetic measurements LIT NIT: Magnetic Measurements 99625

3.3 General Design3.3.1 Nb3Sn MQX for inner triplet3.3.2 SeparationDipoles D1-D23.3.3 Cooling studies for IR3.3.4 Special Magnet studies

Large Aperture Outer Triplet Q4-Q6Analysis of Nb-Ti Phase 1 resultsIR3-IR7 magnet lifetimeDipole first and Two-in-One MQX

3.4 R&D and Prototyping Models and demonstrator3.5 Construction

SuperconductorComponentsToolingMagnet assemblyCryostatsCold TestsMagnetic MeasurementsMagnet ProtectionIntegration in the tunnelInstallationAlignment

15-04-2011


4 Crab Cavities (CC)

4.1Coordination and communications

4.2 Support studies4.3 Compact CC (CCC)

4.3.1 CCC Design4.3.2 CCC Validation Prototyping 4.3.3 CCC construction4.3.4 CCC Cryopmodule components4.3.5 CCC Cryomodule assembly

4.4 Elliptical CC (ECC)4.4.1 ECC Design

4.4.2 ECC Validation Prototyping These lines go on only if CCC fails

4.4.3 ECC construction4.4.4 ECC Cryopmodule components4.4.5 ECC Cryomodule assembly

4.5 Test on beam4.5.1 Test prototype in SPS4.5.2 Test prototype in IP4

4.6 RF Power System4.7 Low level RF (LLRF)4.8 Integration in the tunnel4.9 Installation

15-04-2011


5Collimation project

5.1

Coordination, communication and technical management

Budget & ScheduleQA Safety

5.2 Studies LHC studies and beam lossesEnergy deposition in/around collimatorsRadiation impactSPS and HiRadMat beam tests

5.2Collimation upgrade in the LLSS

DesignConstructionInstallation

5.3Collimation upgrade in DS by warm collimators

General Design & StudiesCryo by-pass

DesignComponentsAssemblyTestsMagnet removal and re-installationModification of LHC layout: cryogenicsModification of LHC layout: vacuumInstallation

5.4Collimation upgrade in DS by cold collimators

5.5 Collimation for IR upgradeSimulation of Beam losses in IRSimulation of Energy deposition in IRDesign of Collimation in the IRCollimators constructionIntegration Installation15-04-2011


6 Cold Powering


6.2Sc Link R&D Horizontal prototype

Development and conctruction 20 m link (ending Phase 1) Cold Powering NIT 99614Test link Magnet Testing NIT 99611

6.3 General DesignLHC Cryogenics: cooling and operationElectrical Transfer and cryostatsEnergy depostion and material studies

6.4 Vertical link for HL IPsR&D and prototypes 60 m longCivil EngineeringConstruction linkConstruction FeedboxesTestIntegration Installation

6.5 Power Converters

7Machine Protection

8

Collider-Experiment Interface

8.1 New beam pipes8.1.1 Studies8.1.2 New beam pipe ATLAS8.1.3 New beam pipe CMS8.1.4 New beam pipe Alice8.1.5 New beam pipe LHCb ?

8.2 Studies of background8.3 TAS & absorbers design

15-04-2011


9 Cryogenics

9.1Cryogenics for test CC in SPS

9.2Cryoplant for upgrade Point 4

9.3 Cryoplants for HL IP1-IP5

10Energy Deposition & Absorber

10.1 ED by Collision DebrisMagnet coil (triplets, D1, D2, MS, DS ?)Cryoequipment s (Magnets, cryostats)Dose for life-time, fluence spectrum Conceptual Design of TAS-TAN-absorbersThermomechanical stress in peak conditionR2E shieldingSc linkModel-Run for activation (with/for SC, see WP 1.4)

10.2 ED by primary beam lossesShower induced on Magnet coil (triplet, D1)background on experimentinfluence of abosrber on Change of beam losses due higher current or different beam parameters

10.3ED by Beam-residual gas interaction

Activation R2EQuench

10.4 Constuction of absorbers

15-04-2011


1111 T dipole Two-in-One for DS

11.1 Short model magnets11.2 Construction

SuperConductorComponentsToolingConstructionCryostatsCold TestsMagnetic MeasurementsMagnet protectionPower converterIntegration tunnel with collimationInstallation

12

Matching Sections and Correctors (Ma.Se.Co.)

12.1 Lay-out studies & design12.1.1 Magnet design & prototypes12.1.2 hardware commis.600A12.1.3 MQT new powering

12.2 Magnets ConstructionMQY wideMCBYMatc.Section ModificationNew MQs P6-P7Power TestMagnetic MeasurementsMagnet ProtectionIntegrationInstallation

12.3 Cryogenics modifications12.4 Vacuum modification15-04-2011


13Integration and (de-)installation

14Hardware commissioning

15 Beam Diagnostics

15.1Studies New diagnostics for HiLumi

15.2 LRBB compensating wirestudiesprototypesTest in LHC ConstructionsIntegration Installation

15-04-2011


16High Field Magnet R&D

HFM: design, analysis and test HFM: design, analysis and test 99150HFM: insulation and impregnation

HFM: insulation and impregnation 99151

HFM: constructions HFM: constructions 99152FP7 HFM Fresca2 (CERN) FP7 HFM Fresca2 (CERN) 99353FP7 HFM Fresca2 (EU) FP7 HFM Fresca2 (EU) 99354HFM Power Tests HFM Power Tests 99344HFM MM magnetic measurements

HFM MM magnetic measurements 99345

Eucard HFM HTS Links (CERN) Eucard HFM HTS Links (CERN) 99153Eucard HFM HTS Links (EU) Eucard HFM HTS Links (EU) 99161

17 HE-LHC StudiesGeneral accelerator concepts & integrationOptics and lay-outImpedance and collective effectsMagnets

Magnet designSuperconductorsMagnets short models

CryogenicsVacuum SR topicsInjection and dumpCollimationMachine protectionRF

15-04-2011

Long term R&D aimed at SC R&D and validation via FRESCA2 (13 T 100 mm)

Preparation of EU Sc cable, tooling technologies (help from US-LRP)

Lucio Rossi @sLHC2011 22

HiLumi FP7 Design Study

Saclay - 8 Feb 2011

WP1 Project Management and Technical Coordination

WP2 Accelerator Physics and Performance

WP3 Magnet Design

WP5 IR Collimation

WP6 Cold Powering

WP4 Crab Cavities

HiLumi LHC

WP7 Machine Protection

WP8 Collider-Experiment Interface

WP9 Cryogenics

WP10 Energy Deposition and shielding

WP11 11 tesla dipole two-in-one

WP12 Integration & (de)installation

Non-HiLumi LHC

HL-LHC Design Study

End of year


Large participationapplication 25 Nov 2010

Saclay - 8 Feb 2011

Participant no.

Participant organisation name Short name

Country

1 (Coord-inator)

European Organization for Nuclear Research CERN IEIO1

2 Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux énergies alternatives

CEA France

3 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique CNRS France

4 Stiftung Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY Germany

5 Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare INFN Italy

6 Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics BINP Russia

7 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas CSIC Spain

8 École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne EPFL Switzerland

9 Royal Holloway, University of London RHUL UK

10 University of Southampton SOTON UK

11 Science & Technology Facilities Council STFC UK

12 University of Lancaster ULANC UK

13 University of Liverpool UNILIV UK

14 University of Manchester UNIMAN UK

15 High Energy Accelerator Research Organization KEK Japan

16 Brookhaven National Laboratory BNL USA

17 Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (Fermilab)

FNAL USA

18 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory LBNL USA

19 Old Dominion University ODU USA

20 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory SLAC USA

1 International European Interest Organisation


HiLumi is the focal point of 20 years of converging International collaboration

• The collaboration wiht US on LHC upgrafe started during the cosntruction of LHC

• EU programs have been instruemntal in federatin all EU efforts

• With Hi-Lumi the coordination makes a step further: from coordinated R&D to a common project

• CERN is not anymore the unique owner, rather is the motor and cathalizer of a wider effort.

• Manged like a large detector collaboration (with CERN in special position as operator of LHC)

Saclay - 8 Feb 2011


Budget FP7 HiLumi

Saclay - 8 Feb 2011

Waiving effect

CERN waives all technical works: LHC is core program.Only kept the CERN cost for managem.

50%85% of CERN gen. mngt

Only EU research area

N.1/67Score 15/15

4.9 M€


Budget cont.

Saclay - 8 Feb 2011

Design in FP7 HiLumi

Extra effort for Design

R&D and proto

Industrialization & Construction TOT Industry

W1-WP6 27 10 50 200 287 160WP7-12 0 15 30 100 145 80Other 0 5 10 50 65 40TOT 27 30 90 350 497 280

Personnel for HiLumi by WP1. Manag and Tech. Coord. (6%)2. Acc. Physics and beam3. Magnets for IR4. Crab Cavities5. Collimators6. Sc links

Estimated cost for the the whole HL-LHC over 10 years in M€

Precise cost evaluation by end 2011


In-Kind contributions: targets

• Profiting of LARP– 200 M$ from USA (US accounting)

• 5 G¥ (50 MCHF) from Japan• Others?

– Member states? Difficult or impossible? • CH and FR are theobvious candidates• Othr MSs (or Labs) with specific interest or exchange of

help we give them

– Non MSs: we need to think wide…

15-04-2011


conclusions

15-04-2011

A luminous future in front of us!!!

(Lucio: from Lucius = lux)

HL-LHC: scope, structure and management

Documents

Transcript of HL-LHC: scope, structure and management