History of British Legal System

download History of British Legal System

of 3

description

Legal System

Transcript of History of British Legal System

The History of the British Legal System and the Solicitor's and Barrister's ProfessionThe Evolution of the Modern Day SolicitorDuring the 16thCentury the legal process was hierarchical. At the very top of the heap was the Royal power base, i.e. the King's Bench and Star Chamber. These courts dealt generally with elements of treason and the protection of royal interest. When moving down the line, the next is the Assize, the Quarter Sessions and finally the Manorial and Archdeaconary courts.While the King's Bench and Star Chamber dealt with direct crimes against the Royal House and Parliament, the remaining courts dealt with the general population and their crimes. The Assize courts were presented with serious offenders which ultimately could be sentenced the death penalty. For example, during the Chelmsford Assize of 1585, Thomas Gawdy and Serjeant Francis Gawdy tried Richard Norry.'Norry Richard, of Hatfield Peveral, butcher, indicted for murder. On 22 September 1584 at Hatfield Peverel he attacked Richard Duke with a pike-staff, inflicting injuries from which he died on 29 September. Not Guilty.'The next court in the ladder was the Quarter Session, where petty offenses, administration and misdemeanours were tried. According to J.A Sharpe the Quarter Sessions emerged from the 14thCenturyStatute of Labourers, dictating that the Justices were to meet four times a year to enforce legislation. From 1360 onwards the trial of capital offences could be tried at the Quarter Sessions. After 1590 however, they were generally left to the Assize. Occasionally there were exceptions: an individual was convicted and hanged by the Quarter Sessions in 1654. It is quite amazing that the Quarter Sessions survived right up to 1971.Further down the line was the Manorial court. This court tried minor offenses and administered the transferral of land. For the social historian the most interesting of the lower courts was the Church courts. Archdeaconary records are a font of village gossip, addressing the issues of drunkenness, adultery and incest. The courts even tried individuals for playing instruments on the Sabbath.In 1668, the Archdeaconary Court tried in Braintree 'Mr John Lerkin et Anna Hurrell for 'being a-bed together''. Mr Robert Poole was tried for 'lending his hog on the Sabath Day commonly called Sunday'. In 1669, in Braintree, John Danby from Wethersfield was tried for 'That he married his wifes sisters daughter which is incest and not knowing whether her husband be dead or not'.Punishment for petty offences was shame and humiliation. There were numerous recorded incidents of ducking stools, stocks and of bespoke punishments thought up for a specific crime. One such example was recorded in 1608 when John Taylor was indicted for 'wearinge weomen's apparell'; his sentence was 'his clothes to be cut and breeches to be mode of them & to be whipped thorowe the citie tomorrowe'.An accused would be presented before a judge and jury; counsel during this early period of English history was rare. Other than the elite and highly educated men, like Coke, there were arguably only the country attorneys.During the 18thCentury barristers were becoming a more common feature of country life, and as time progressed their wealth and status grew. By 1739 a new society was formed, namely 'The Society of Gentlemen Practitioners in the Courts of Law and Equity'. This society endeavoured to protect the high standards and the conduct which go hand in hand with the legal profession. Arguably, by the 1750s, the barrister, lawyer and solicitor had established themselves as an organised profession.Before the establishment of the legal professions as we know it today, the accused had to argue their own case in court with a direct confrontation between themselves and their accuser. Other than in case of serious cases of treason, defence counsels were rarely seen in the court room. The Treason Act of 1692 introduced the common feature of a defence counsel, and as time passed, prosecution counsels were introduced for homicide. This can hardly be seen as a revolution; it was more of an evolution. It was not until the 19thCentury that there was a distinct change. With a gaggle of Acts, for example the Prisoner's Counsel Act 1836 and the Poor Prisoner's Defence Act 1903, counsel became a regular sight in the court room.References.Beattie, J.M (1986).Crime and the Courts inEngland1660-1800.Oxford: Claradon Press.Kent,J.R (1986).The English village constable. 1580-1642 a social and administrative study.Oxford: Oxford University Press.Sharpe,J.A (1985.) 'The People in Law'. In B.Reay (ed)Popular Culture in seventeenth- centuryEngland. London: Routledge.

http://voices.yahoo.com/the-history-british-legal-system-solicitors-4547977.html?cat=37