History of British Legal System
-
Upload
sarah-baylon -
Category
Documents
-
view
5 -
download
0
description
Transcript of History of British Legal System
![Page 1: History of British Legal System](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082821/55cf9913550346d0339b6672/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The History of the British Legal System and the Solicitor's and Barrister's ProfessionThe Evolution of the Modern Day Solicitor
During the 16th Century the legal process was hierarchical. At the very top of the
heap was the Royal power base, i.e. the King's Bench and Star Chamber. These
courts dealt generally with elements of treason and the protection of royal interest.
When moving down the line, the next is the Assize, the Quarter Sessions and finally
the Manorial and Archdeaconary courts.
While the King's Bench and Star Chamber dealt with direct crimes against the
Royal House and Parliament, the remaining courts dealt with the general
population and their crimes. The Assize courts were presented with serious
offenders which ultimately could be sentenced the death penalty. For example,
during the Chelmsford Assize of 1585, Thomas Gawdy and Serjeant Francis Gawdy
tried Richard Norry.
'Norry Richard, of Hatfield Peveral, butcher, indicted for murder. On 22 September
1584 at Hatfield Peverel he attacked Richard Duke with a pike-staff, inflicting
injuries from which he died on 29 September. Not Guilty.'
The next court in the ladder was the Quarter Session, where petty offenses,
administration and misdemeanours were tried. According to J.A Sharpe the
Quarter Sessions emerged from the 14thCentury Statute of Labourers, dictating
that the Justices were to meet four times a year to enforce legislation. From 1360
onwards the trial of capital offences could be tried at the Quarter Sessions. After
1590 however, they were generally left to the Assize. Occasionally there were
exceptions: an individual was convicted and hanged by the Quarter Sessions in
1654. It is quite amazing that the Quarter Sessions survived right up to 1971.
Further down the line was the Manorial court. This court tried minor offenses and
administered the transferral of land. For the social historian the most interesting
of the lower courts was the Church courts. Archdeaconary records are a font of
![Page 2: History of British Legal System](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082821/55cf9913550346d0339b6672/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
village gossip, addressing the issues of drunkenness, adultery and incest. The
courts even tried individuals for playing instruments on the Sabbath.
In 1668, the Archdeaconary Court tried in Braintree 'Mr John Lerkin et Anna
Hurrell for 'being a-bed together''. Mr Robert Poole was tried for 'lending his hog
on the Sabath Day commonly called Sunday'. In 1669, in Braintree, John Danby
from Wethersfield was tried for 'That he married his wifes sisters daughter which
is incest and not knowing whether her husband be dead or not'.
Punishment for petty offences was shame and humiliation. There were numerous
recorded incidents of ducking stools, stocks and of bespoke punishments thought
up for a specific crime. One such example was recorded in 1608 when John Taylor
was indicted for 'wearinge weomen's apparell'; his sentence was 'his clothes to be
cut and breeches to be mode of them & to be whipped thorowe the citie
tomorrowe'.
An accused would be presented before a judge and jury; counsel during this early
period of English history was rare. Other than the elite and highly educated men,
like Coke, there were arguably only the country attorneys.
During the 18th Century barristers were becoming a more common feature of
country life, and as time progressed their wealth and status grew. By 1739 a new
society was formed, namely 'The Society of Gentlemen Practitioners in the Courts
of Law and Equity'. This society endeavoured to protect the high standards and the
conduct which go hand in hand with the legal profession. Arguably, by the 1750s,
the barrister, lawyer and solicitor had established themselves as an organised
profession.
Before the establishment of the legal professions as we know it today, the accused
had to argue their own case in court with a direct confrontation between
themselves and their accuser. Other than in case of serious cases of treason,
defence counsels were rarely seen in the court room. The Treason Act of 1692
introduced the common feature of a defence counsel, and as time passed,
prosecution counsels were introduced for homicide. This can hardly be seen as a
![Page 3: History of British Legal System](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082821/55cf9913550346d0339b6672/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
revolution; it was more of an evolution. It was not until the 19th Century that there
was a distinct change. With a gaggle of Acts, for example the Prisoner's Counsel
Act 1836 and the Poor Prisoner's Defence Act 1903, counsel became a regular
sight in the court room.
References.
Beattie, J.M (1986). Crime and the Courts in England 1660-1800. Oxford: Claradon
Press.
Kent,J.R (1986).The English village constable. 1580-1642 a social and
administrative study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sharpe,J.A (1985.) 'The People in Law'. In B.Reay (ed) Popular Culture in
seventeenth- centuryEngland. London: Routledge.
http://voices.yahoo.com/the-history-british-legal-system-solicitors-4547977.html?cat=37