Hindu Students Council · word poet Hussain Haidry, who has insisted on using the word “Hindu”...
Transcript of Hindu Students Council · word poet Hussain Haidry, who has insisted on using the word “Hindu”...
To Whomever It May Concern:
Hindu Students Council, representing tens of thousands of Hindu students and alumni at Universities
throughout North America, strongly condemns a Twitter post made on December 11 by Harvard’s Kennedy
School of Government Senior Fellow Suraj Yengde. In the post, Dr. Yengde calls Hindus the “sick people of
India,” arguing that it is “their religious books who train the mind.” The post is reproduced below.
As Hindu students and allies throughout North American campuses, we feel compelled to speak out and
bring this egregious instance of Hinduphobia to your attention. Deplorably, this instance follows a line of
statements made by faculty, post-doctoral researchers, and employees and institutions attached to Harvard
University that have a chilling effect on Hindu members of the University community. As any premier
research institution, Harvard has a responsibility to balance the interest of fostering free speech with its stated
commitment to diversity, inclusion and belonging, reproduced below:
At Harvard, there is a call to action to create greater diversity, inclusion and belonging (DIB) throughout our
campus communities. We each have the opportunity — and the responsibility — to create an inclusive and
hospitable culture.
As should be clear, Yengde’s words fall into recognized categories of religious bigotry. His words imply
that Hindus are brainwashed by Hindu dharma’s revered, sacred texts and conditioned into an inherently
violent and oppressive outlook on the world. Hinduism is thus reduced to a single monolithic bloc,
inherently incapable of evincing a positive outlook towards members of other communities or classes.
: www.hindustudentscouncil.org * [email protected]
- P.O. Box 5313, Old Bridge, NJ 08857
Hindu Students Council
Calling the 900 million Hindus in India “sick” similarly vilifies Hindus as inferior, in need of being removed
and disabused of a dangerous, diseased ideology.
What is worse is that Yengde, whom Harvard calls “one of India’s leading scholars and public
intellectuals,” has a grossly distorted view of Hinduism, to put it euphemistically. We stand against violence
towards Dalits, no matter which religion they practice. Caste discrimination is a problem across South Asia
that transcends religion— Hindus, Sikhs, Jains, Christians, and Muslims all encounter caste-based
discrimination across South Asia. It’s shameful that we have to put this disclaimer in our statement, but this
is exactly what Yengde’s post does. He forces Hindus to apologize for caste discrimination as if our
scriptures are to blame. This is in spite of the fact that Hindu scriptures themselves provide a rich,
foundational basis from which to battle against discrimination in all its forms.
This type of vilification and anti-religious sentiment is of course not uniquely experienced by Hindus.
Harvard has in fact recognized, and its administration acted against, this type of obvious bigotry towards other
religious groups. Yet, we find, persistently, that Harvard has never recognized even the existence of
Hinduphobia within its community, let alone its embeddedness at an institutional level. We mention here just
two other recent examples. In February, as part of its India Conference, Harvard University hosted spoken
word poet Hussain Haidry, who has insisted on using the word “Hindu” only as a descriptor for acts of terror;
he instead chooses to use “Brahminism” to refer to Hinduism which he then calls “root of all that is evil in
India.” (To point out the commonality in anti-religious bigotries here, Haidry has also justified the Holocaust)
Tweets from Hussain Haidry’s Twitter handle. These repeatedly juxtapose the word “Hindu” with “Terrorism” while also refusing to use the word “Hindu”
to describe the religion. Instead, Haidry uses “Brahmanism” to describe the religion.
In April, Harvard University Press circulated an event titled,
“Meritocracy and Democracy: The Social Life of Caste in India,”
along with a racist cartoon of Hindus from the era of British
colonialism that portrays Hindus as inherently oppressive and
manipulable. At that time, Hindu Students Council had contacted
Harvard about this incident and received no reply. How can Harvard
continue to justify suborning Hinduphobia within its ranks?
In the past, when the Hindu community contacted Harvard,
the University defended the actions of its employees under the
overarching banner of free speech. This does not pass muster. The
University has made an honorable commitment to uphold the
inclusion of all individuals at the University. When the repeated
actions of members of the community infringe on that sense of
inclusion in a manner as flagrant as anti-religious hate speech, the University must recognize its imperative to
act and speak to ensure inclusion. When the University recognizes certain kinds of anti-religious hate speech,
but remains silent when the Hindu community is explicitly attacked in this way, it unfortunately sends a clear
message to Hindus at Harvard that they do not belong. The right to free speech does not preclude—but rather
calls upon— Harvard University’s administration to speak out and affirm the belongingness of Hindus at
Harvard, condemning anti-Hindu bigotry. A failure to do so is a tacit endorsement of Yengde’s words.
Today, Harvard’s choices about how it chooses to address its own institutional Hinduphobia will speak
volumes about its values. Over the past few weeks, several members of Harvard’s community—its Medical
School and undergraduate and graduate communities—have reached out to us with grave concern over
Yengde’s words and how they may lead to their alienation within the University, in combination with the
prevailing culture of Hinduphobia that already pervades the College. Members of all faith communities
deserve to be respected and own their identity at Harvard. Will the University reduce its own commitments to
a dead letter, or reaffirm the way in which the Hindu community enriches Harvard? We urge Harvard to
embrace the latter path by, at minimum, issuing a public statement recognizing this instance of
Hinduphobia and explicitly reaffirming the inclusion of the Hindu community at Harvard.
On Behalf of Hindu Students Council,
Arnav Kejriwal
President, Hindu Students Council