HIM: 2010, Q1 GSTS Action Planning Comfort of bed and pillow (81.9 ; 0.7)

3
1 Key Prioriti es Root Causes Actions Action By Start Date Target Completio n Date Remarks External laundry Outsourced Laundry did not consistently provide clean linen. (I-Interview feedback mostly on linen issue only) 1. Meeting was held with Mr.Azman (Owner of Azman Laundry) and GM/RDM/QCIM: a) Both parties agreed that QCIM will audit laundry flow and HIM flow, and come out with flow chart b) Base on flow chart analysis, both parties agreed to appoint and train HIM linen staff to be placed at the laundry site for quality control. c) Daily reporting and review weekly by RDM/ GM on linen rejection rate ( max 5%) and reject reasons d) EHK to report daily and review weekly by RDM/GM for number of accumulated reject linen (to be sent for special treatment) QCIM QCIM/ Executive Housekeeper Executive Housekeeper /RDM/GM Executive Housekeeper/RD M/GM 11 May 1 Jun 1 Jun 1 July 17 May 5 Jun Ongoing Ongoing See attached flow chart HIM: 2010, Q1 GSTS Action Planning Comfort of bed and pillow (81.9 ; 0.7)

description

HIM: 2010, Q1 GSTS Action Planning Comfort of bed and pillow (81.9 ; 0.7). HIM: 2010, Q1 GSTS Action Planning Comfort of bed and pillow (81.9 ; 0.7). Linen Flow. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of HIM: 2010, Q1 GSTS Action Planning Comfort of bed and pillow (81.9 ; 0.7)

Page 1: HIM:    2010, Q1  GSTS Action Planning Comfort of bed and pillow  (81.9 ; 0.7)

1

Key Priorities

Root Causes Actions Action By Start

Date

Target Completio

n Date

Remarks

External laundry

Outsourced Laundry did not consistently provide clean linen. (I-Interview feedback mostly on linen issue only)

1. Meeting was held with Mr.Azman (Owner of Azman Laundry) and GM/RDM/QCIM:

a) Both parties agreed that

QCIM will audit laundry flow and HIM flow, and come out with flow chart

b) Base on flow chart analysis, both parties agreed to appoint and train HIM linen staff to be placed at the laundry site for quality control.

c) Daily reporting and review weekly by RDM/ GM on linen rejection rate ( max 5%) and reject reasons

d) EHK to report daily and review weekly by RDM/GM for number of accumulated reject linen (to be sent for special treatment)

QCIM

QCIM/ Executive Housekeeper

Executive Housekeeper /RDM/GM

Executive Housekeeper/RDM/GM

11 May

1 Jun

1 Jun

1 July

17 May

5 Jun

Ongoing

Ongoing

See attached flow chart

HIM: 2010, Q1 GSTS Action PlanningComfort of bed and pillow (81.9 ; 0.7)

Page 2: HIM:    2010, Q1  GSTS Action Planning Comfort of bed and pillow  (81.9 ; 0.7)

2

Key Priorities

Root Causes Actions Action By Start

Date

Target Completio

n Date

Remarks

Linen par level

Communication with suppliers

Red zone (Linen handling area)

Par level and laundry quality was not monitored

No regular communication with Azman and Ecolab

Contamination of linen during handling process

1. Linen was checked and beefed up before thebusy period during endof May( borrowed 100king and 250 twin bedsheet from HIGL) , in anticipation of busy schoolholiday period.

2. Monthly reporting ofpar levels ( to be signedoff by RDM /EHK min par levels 3.5)

Weekly review meeting

Improve Red zone area byputting fencingand surface protection(e.g. canvas on floor )

Executive Housekeeper

Executive Housekeeper/RDM

Executive Housekeeper/RDM/GM/QCIM/Azman Ecolab

Executive Housekeeper

31 May

1 Jun

1 Jul

31 May

4 Jun

30 Jun (Ongoing monthly)

Weekly

4 Jun

Additional linen ordered expected to arrive end of Jun

Monthly Inventory

HIM: 2010, Q1 GSTS Action PlanningComfort of bed and pillow (81.9 ; 0.7)

Page 3: HIM:    2010, Q1  GSTS Action Planning Comfort of bed and pillow  (81.9 ; 0.7)

3

Linen Flow