Higher Education Desegregation: An Analysis of State Efforts in Systems Formally Operating...
-
Upload
harvey-burns -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of Higher Education Desegregation: An Analysis of State Efforts in Systems Formally Operating...
![Page 1: Higher Education Desegregation: An Analysis of State Efforts in Systems Formally Operating Segregated Systems of Higher Education Louisiana State University.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082421/56649d045503460f949d7e75/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Higher Education Desegregation: An Analysis of State Efforts in Systems Formally Operating
Segregated Systems of Higher Education
Louisiana State UniversityEdwin Litolff
![Page 2: Higher Education Desegregation: An Analysis of State Efforts in Systems Formally Operating Segregated Systems of Higher Education Louisiana State University.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082421/56649d045503460f949d7e75/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Statement of Problem
The purpose of this study is to longitudinally analyze the results of desegregation efforts at public colleges and universities in states that formally operated dual systems of higher education. The progress, rate of change, and pattern of desegregation will be quantifiably measured using a desegregation index and analyzed using repeated measure analysis of variance, cross-sectional analysis, log linear trend analysis, and time series analysis
![Page 3: Higher Education Desegregation: An Analysis of State Efforts in Systems Formally Operating Segregated Systems of Higher Education Louisiana State University.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082421/56649d045503460f949d7e75/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Research Questions
• To what extent have the states that previously operated dual systems of higher education and were involved in the Adams v. Richardson (1973) litigation desegregated?
• To what degree and at what rate has desegregation taken place in the states that previously operated dual systems of higher education and were involved in the Adams v. Richardson (1973) litigation?
• Is there a difference in desegregation results between two-year and four-year institutions in states that previously operated dual systems of higher education and were involved in the Adams v. Richardson (1973) litigation?
![Page 4: Higher Education Desegregation: An Analysis of State Efforts in Systems Formally Operating Segregated Systems of Higher Education Louisiana State University.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082421/56649d045503460f949d7e75/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Higher Education Desegregation
• Historical perspective– Morrill Act II– Plessy v. Ferguson– Brown v. Board of Education– Civil Rights Act– Adams v. Richardson– California v. Bakke– United States v. Fordice– Hopwood v. Texas– Michigan Cases (Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v.
Bollinger)
![Page 5: Higher Education Desegregation: An Analysis of State Efforts in Systems Formally Operating Segregated Systems of Higher Education Louisiana State University.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082421/56649d045503460f949d7e75/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Higher Education Desegregation• Alabama• Arkansas• Delaware• Florida• Georgia• Kentucky• Louisiana• Maryland• Mississippi• Missouri• North Carolina• Ohio• Oklahoma• Pennsylvania• South Carolina• Tennessee• Texas• Virginia• West Virginia
![Page 6: Higher Education Desegregation: An Analysis of State Efforts in Systems Formally Operating Segregated Systems of Higher Education Louisiana State University.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082421/56649d045503460f949d7e75/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Methodology
• Descriptive research technique• Desegregation Index
– Data Collection• 18 Years of IPEDS Enrollment Data between
1980 and 2004• Over 37,000 records for all 50 states
– Sample• Public, degree granting higher education
institutions with at least 2 year degree programs in the United states
– Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance– Time Series
![Page 7: Higher Education Desegregation: An Analysis of State Efforts in Systems Formally Operating Segregated Systems of Higher Education Louisiana State University.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082421/56649d045503460f949d7e75/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Desegregation Index
½ D =
n1 N
w1 W
0 = Complete Desegregation
100 = Complete Segregation
![Page 8: Higher Education Desegregation: An Analysis of State Efforts in Systems Formally Operating Segregated Systems of Higher Education Louisiana State University.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082421/56649d045503460f949d7e75/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Adams vs. Non Adams States
42.4
32.8
39.4
28.7
05
1015202530354045
1980 2004
Adams States Non Adams States
![Page 9: Higher Education Desegregation: An Analysis of State Efforts in Systems Formally Operating Segregated Systems of Higher Education Louisiana State University.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082421/56649d045503460f949d7e75/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Desegregation Index 1980/2004
State 1980 2004
MO 53.39 48.70
DE 56.48 48.60
MD 50.80 47.73
TN 43.02 47.09
AR 38.57 46.38
NC 45.62 43.53
PA 51.22 43.50
MS 52.84 41.62
AL 35.89 40.98
LA 52.33 40.56
GA 34.55 40.34
VA 46.85 38.23
TX 43.58 37.79
FL 32.21 36.44
KY 30.26 31.99
SC 41.00 31.94
OH 34.39 31.11
OK 28.19 27.81
WV 33.56 24.62
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
MO
DE
MD
TN
AR
NC
PA
MS
AL
LA
GA
VA
TX
FL
KY
SC
OH
OK
WV
![Page 10: Higher Education Desegregation: An Analysis of State Efforts in Systems Formally Operating Segregated Systems of Higher Education Louisiana State University.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082421/56649d045503460f949d7e75/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Largest Declines – Louisiana/MississippiLouisiana
5250 51 52 52 52 51 49 49 48
46 4643 43 42 41 41 41
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1980
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Mississippi
5350 51 49
46 45 44 4446
42 40 41 41 39 41 41 41 42
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1980
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
![Page 11: Higher Education Desegregation: An Analysis of State Efforts in Systems Formally Operating Segregated Systems of Higher Education Louisiana State University.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082421/56649d045503460f949d7e75/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Largest Increases – Arkansas/Alabama
Alabama
36 36 37 37 3841 41 39
34 34 34
40 40 38 39 40 41 41
05
101520253035404550
1980
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Arkansas
39 3741 41
38 38 40 41 42 44 45 47 45 44 46 47 46 46
05
101520253035404550
1980
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
![Page 12: Higher Education Desegregation: An Analysis of State Efforts in Systems Formally Operating Segregated Systems of Higher Education Louisiana State University.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082421/56649d045503460f949d7e75/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Possible Conclusions/Implications• Desegregation results/trends
• Forecasting• Policy implications• Cause-effect relationships
• Future Studies• State and Federal Policy• Higher Education Policy• Institutions (Desegregation index, enrollment,
funding, degree programs, faculty/staff Desegregation Index
• Management Boards• Scholarships/Recruiting
![Page 13: Higher Education Desegregation: An Analysis of State Efforts in Systems Formally Operating Segregated Systems of Higher Education Louisiana State University.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082421/56649d045503460f949d7e75/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Questions/Comments