High-Resolution Simulations of the 25 December 2002 Banded Snowstorm using Eta, MM5, and WRF David...
-
date post
22-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of High-Resolution Simulations of the 25 December 2002 Banded Snowstorm using Eta, MM5, and WRF David...
High-Resolution Simulations of the 25 December 2002 Banded Snowstorm using Eta, MM5, and WRF
David NovakNOAA/ NWS Eastern Region Headquarters, Scientific Services Division, Bohemia, New York
Brian ColleUniversity at Stony Brook, State University of New York, Stony Brook, New York
Daniel KeyserUniversity at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, New York
25 December 2002 Snowstorm
Conceptual Models
Novak et al. 2004 Moore (2003)
Synoptic Environment Frontal Environment
Motivation• Can high-resolution models simulate the physical
processes responsible for mesoscale banding?
• What is the simulated relationship between the modeled band and frontogenesis, weak moist symmetric stability (MSS), moisture, and ascent?
• Does precipitation drift influence the forecast band location?
• What are the predictability limits of mesoscale banded features?
Case Study Design• 25 December 2002 Banded Snowstorm:
– Compare Eta, MM5, and WRF forecasts to observations– Models initialized at 0000 UTC 25 Dec 2002
Model Resolution Convection Boundary Layer
Micro-physics
FSL RUC 20 km Grell–Devenyi Burk– Thompson
Simple Ice
NCEP Eta 12 km BMJ Mellor–Yamada (MY)
Ferrier
NCAR PSU MM5
12 km Grell MRF Simple Ice
NCAR WRF v2.0
12 km Grell–Devenyi YSU Simple Ice
25 December 2002 SnowstormLow Track Comparison
25 December 2002 Snowstorm
MSLP Time Series
960
965
970
975
980
985
990
995
1000
12Z 15Z 18Z 21Z 00Z 03Z 06Z
Time (UTC)
MS
LP
(m
b) Obs
Eta
MM5
WRF
QPF Performance1200 UTC 25 Dec – 1200 UTC 26 Dec QPF
ObsMax = 3.00 in.
EtaMax = 1.50 in.
MM5Max = 1.85 in.
WRFMax = 2.25 in.
RUC Analyses
• Radar Reflectivity • 700-hPa Miller 2D Frontogenesis [thin solid; ºC (100 km)–1 (3 h)–1 ]• 700-hPa Geopotential Height (thick solid)
RUC Cross Section
• Frontogenesis (shaded)
• Өes (solid)
• EPVf* = 0 PVU (green)
• Relative Humidity (shaded)
• Vertical Velocity (dashed; µb s-1)
Eta Forecast
• 3-h Accumulated Precip (shaded; hundreths in.)• 700-hPa Miller 2D Frontogenesis [thin solid; ºC (100 km)–1 (3 h)–1 ]• 700-hPa Geopotential Height (thick solid)
Eta Cross Section
• Frontogenesis (shaded)
• Өes (solid)
• EPVf* = 0 PVU (green)
• Relative Humidity (shaded)
• Vertical Velocity (dashed; µb s-1)
MM5 Simulation
Reflectivity
Frontogenesis
Ө
Circulation
EPVf*
< 0
Өes
Circulation
WRF Simulation
Reflectivity
Frontogenesis
Ө
Circulation
EPVf*
< 0
Өes
Circulation
Relationship between the Band, Frontogenesis, weak MSS, and Moisture
MM5 WRF
2000 UTC2000 UTC
Precipitation Drift?
After 2200 UTC
•30 dBZ core of band tilted towards SE
•height of 30 dBZ core steadily descends
2100 UTC2200 UTC2300 UTC0000 UTC0100 UTC0200 UTC0300 UTC
ENX ENX
Precipitation Drift?
Schenectady (SCH) Wind Profiler
Using SCH winds at 2200 UTC, assuming crystal fall speed of ~1 m s-1 and steady-state conditions:
Crystal drifts 46.3 km @ 222°
Findings• Eta/MM5/WRF capable of simulating mesoscale band
formation and dissipation
• All three model forecasts showed a narrow sloping ascent maximum associated with strong midlevel frontogenesis and weak moist symmetric stability
• Model QPFs were underdone by as much as 50% in the banded region, and exhibited a southeast position error.
• Slantwise ascent and precipitation drift may account for slight displacement (20–40 km) between frontogenesis maximum and band
• Despite different surface cyclone intensities, all three models predicted band formation, suggesting some predictability in this case
Future Work• Explore why all three model forecasts exhibited a southeast position error and dissipated the band too early
• Diagnose 3D hydrometeor trajectories across the band
• Perform higher-resolution (4 km / 1.33 km) model runs
• Use high-resolution ensembles to explore mesoscale banding predictability in this case
Ensembles
WRF Eta Init Grell–Devenyi / YSU Simple Ice
MM5 Eta init Grell / MRF Simple Ice
MM5 GFS init Grell / MRF Simple Ice
MM5 Eta init Grell / GS Simple Ice
MM5 Eta init KF / MRF Simple Ice
MM5 Eta init Grell / MRF Reisner
WRF Eta Init KF / YSU Simple Ice