High P T Identified Particles at STAR
description
Transcript of High P T Identified Particles at STAR
Nov 1-2, 2001 High PT Phenomena at RHIC 1STAR
High PT Identified Particles at STARB. Lasiuk (YALE) for the STAR collaboration
•Hard Processes at RHIC
•STAR Measurements–Detectors–Methods–Physics Implication
•Some Results and Beyond… at STAR...
Nov 1-2, 2001 High PT Phenomena at RHIC 2STAR
Hard Process Observables• Jets are the Most Direct Observable
– 30% of particle production at RHIC energies– In pp, e+e-, light ions
• Event Backgrounds Favorable
• Difficult in Au+Au
• What Can We See in Au+Au?– Leading Particles– Azimuthal Correlations– High Mass Objects
OPAL qq jet
Nov 1-2, 2001 High PT Phenomena at RHIC 3STAR
Models and Physics Implications• Parton Propagation Affects Spectral Shape
– dE/dx softens spectra
– color screening (high density)
– Where does the onset occur?
• Identified Particle Production Rates– Medium Effects on Fragmentation Functions
– Asymmetries in Coupling Between Quarks and Gluons
• Measured PT Anisotropy– Sensitive to Propagation Through Matter
Nov 1-2, 2001 High PT Phenomena at RHIC 4STAR
Charged Multiplicity
• Spectrum Softens with– Energy Loss– Increasing Multiplicity– Gluon Density
• Onset of Hard Scattering
M. Gyulassy, I. Vitev, X.N. Wang PRL 86 (2001) 2537
Where Does it Affect “MEASURED” Spectrum?
Nov 1-2, 2001 High PT Phenomena at RHIC 5STAR
STAR Detector
• Year 1 Detectors Shown– TPC
– RICH • Extensions in Year 2…
– Calorimeter
ZDC
Magnet
ZDC
Central Trigger Barrel
Time Projection Chamber
RICH
• Hadronic Observables:
• PID by Several Detectors
• Focus on Central Region
Nov 1-2, 2001 High PT Phenomena at RHIC 6STAR
STAR TPC• Large Acceptance
– |y|<1.6• High Efficiency Tracking• Azimuthally Symmetric• B Field = 2.5 kG
– Limits Momentum Resolution
– For 2001: 5.0 kG
• PID via Ionization– Below 1 GeV/c– Other Detectors Augment
Capabilities
PT (GeV/c)
Fra
ctio
nal
Mom
entu
m R
esol
uti
on •From Embedding
•“Primaries”
Nov 1-2, 2001 High PT Phenomena at RHIC 7STAR
Identification of Particles
•Specific Ionization
•Secondary Vertices (Topology)
•Ko
•RICH•TOF and Calorimetry …
Nov 1-2, 2001 High PT Phenomena at RHIC 8STAR
STAR-RICH Detector
• Radiator– C6F14 Liquid
• Photo Converter– CsI
– < 210 (nm)
• Ionization Detector– MWPC pad chamber
– CH4 Gas
80 mm
STAR-RICH Collaboration Headed by F. Piuz, E. Nappi, G. Paic, G.J. Kunde
Developed by CERN RD-26 in ALICE framework
Nov 1-2, 2001 High PT Phenomena at RHIC 9STAR
Identification with RICH• Direct Ray Tracing
– Hough Transform– D. Elia et al., NIM A433 (1999) 262.
• Momentum Range1 < p < 3
2 < p < 5 p
Nov 1-2, 2001 High PT Phenomena at RHIC 10STAR
Identification with RICH• Geometrical Patterns
– Statistical Basis
D
p
K
Ring
C
oun
ts
Nov 1-2, 2001 High PT Phenomena at RHIC 11STAR
15% Central
Triggering Capabilities• Symmetric Zero Degree Calorimeters
• Central Trigger Barrel
5% central
Au AuZDC ZDC
Nov 1-2, 2001 High PT Phenomena at RHIC 12STAR
Indications from Inclusive Spectra...
• Indication of:– JET QUENCHING?
STAR preliminary
• Turn over at PT > 2 GeV/c• Large Systematic ~30%• Double the PT Reach this YearX-N Wang
Nov 1-2, 2001 High PT Phenomena at RHIC 13STAR
Identified Particle Yields
• Most Striking for Protons– ~30% for STAR-RICH Range
– effect slight for , K…
• Species/Flavor Dependence– Asymmetry of Leading Particle
– Propagation in Medium
– Coupling to Medium
• Not Restricted to Protons…
• Reference Spectra Importance– Need for PID at RHIC
X.N.Wang, Phys.Rev.C 58 (1998) 2321
RICH Range
Rat
io
Nov 1-2, 2001 High PT Phenomena at RHIC 14STAR
• Constant Yields with PT
* Slight Difference in Centrality
• NO DECREASE with PT
– Compared to Inclusive Spectra
– Compared to v2…???
– Significant in Comparison with Other Observables?
• Extend Reach with 2001 Data– Normalized Spectra
Protons in the Central Region
Nov 1-2, 2001 High PT Phenomena at RHIC 15STAR
Other Hadrons in Central Region• Less Sensitivity to Energy Loss than Protons
• Constant Ratio with PT
• More Statistics in 2001…
• Normalized Spectra
Nov 1-2, 2001 High PT Phenomena at RHIC 16STAR
Spectra
p = pe- + pe+
v
p
Primary Vertex
Photon Momentum Vector
e+
e-
Photon Conversion Vector
z (cm)
r (c
m)
0100200 2001000
100
200
TPC
Fit Mass ~ 131 MeV/ c2
FWHM ~ 20 MeV/c2
Minv (GeV/c2)
Nov 1-2, 2001 High PT Phenomena at RHIC 17STAR
o Spectrum• Small Reconstruction
Efficiency…BUT
• Continuous Kinematic Range
• 2nd
PHENIX pt range
0 - Top 10% most central0 – Minimum Bias data0 – 20% - 50%
1/pt
dN
/dp t (
a.u.
)X.N.Wang, Phys.Rev.C 58 (1998) 2321
• <PT> Consistent with
• Central To Min Bias ~2-3
• …Still Large Errors…
• EMC Extension to 6-10 GeV/c...
Nov 1-2, 2001 High PT Phenomena at RHIC 18STAR
• Anisotropy in geometry:
• Anisotropy in jet quenching:
– hydro valid up to some p t
– without dE/dx
v2 0
– with finite dE/dx
anisotropy in geometry
v2 > 0
Azimuthal Anisotropy
path
leng
th
X-N. Wang PRC 63 (2001) 054902
•A Pathlength Effect
•Sensitive to In Medium Effects
•Energy Loss Increases with Distance
•Difference in Hydrodynamic and Hard Scattering Evolution
Nov 1-2, 2001 High PT Phenomena at RHIC 19STAR
Elliptic Flow…What is it?
2cos2 v
v2: 2nd Harmonic Fourier Coefficient in Azimuthal Distribution of Particles with Respect to the Impact Parameter Vector
Origin: Spatial Anisotropy is created in Non-Central Collisions. Subsequent Rescattering in Evolving System Translates to Dynamics spatial anisotropy momentum anisotropy
Nov 1-2, 2001 High PT Phenomena at RHIC 20STAR
Physics From Anisotropy
• Sensitive to Energy Loss
• Saturation at PT=2 GeV/c
Gyulassy, Vitev and Wang,
Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2537(2001).
Nov 1-2, 2001 High PT Phenomena at RHIC 21STAR
Mass Dependence of v2
• Low PT Follow Hydro Predictions
• High PT Region Access:
– and K0S
– RICH in Future
Calculations: P. Huovinen, P. Kolb and U. Heinz
STAR Preliminary
• Minimum Bias Comparison
– K0S K±
consistent
– and K0S increase to PT =1.5 GeV/c
• “Saturation” of v2 independent of mass
Nov 1-2, 2001 High PT Phenomena at RHIC 22STAR
Conclusions
• STAR Capabilities to Measure Complimentary Observables
– v2 Measured for Kos and o
• Saturation of v2 Appears Independent of Particle Type
• Hydrodynamics Does NOT Describe v2 at PT > 2 GeV/c
– Possibility of Jet Quenching at PT > 2 GeV/c? BUT...
– = 0.6 to PT 2.5 GeV/c
• NO FALL OFF with increasing PT
• Why is Ratio NOT Decreasing if Partonic dE/dx Present?– Flow Effects Strongly Affecting Central Baryons?
– Information Regarding Fragmentation Functions?
/pp
Nov 1-2, 2001 High PT Phenomena at RHIC 23STAR
The
Collaboration
The STAR Collaboration
> 400 collaborators34 institutions8 countries
Brazil: Sao Paolo China: IHEP - Beijing, IPP - Wuhan
England: Birmingham France: IReS - Strasbourg, SUBATECH-Nantes
Germany: Frankfurt, MPI - Munich Poland: Warsaw University, Warsaw U. of TechnologyRussia: MEPHI - Moscow, JINR - Dubna, IHEP - Protvino
U.S.: Argonne, Berkeley, Brookhaven National Laboratories, UC Berkeley, UC Davis, UCLA, Creighton, Carnegie-Mellon, Indiana, Kent State, MSU, CCNY, Ohio State, Penn State, Purdue, Rice, Texas, Texas A&M, Washington, Wayne, Yale University
STARSTAR
Nov 1-2, 2001 High PT Phenomena at RHIC 24STAR
STAR-RICH Collaboration(Baria-CERNb-Yalec)
Y. Andresa, A. Braemb, D. Cozzaa. M. Davenportb,
G. De Cataldoa, L. Dell Oliaa, D. DiBaria, A. DiMaurob,
J.C. Dunlopc, E. Finchc, D.Fraissardb, A. Francoa, J. Gansc,
B. Ghidinia, J.W Harrisc, M. Horsleyc, G.J. Kundec, B. Lasiukc,
Y. Lesenechalb, R.D. Majkac, P. Martinengob, A. Morschb,
E. Nappia, G. Paicb, F. Piuzb, B. Posaa, J.Raynaudb, S. Salurc,
J. Sandweissc, J.C. Santinardb, J. Satinoverc, E.Schynsb,
N. Smirnovc, J. Van Beelenb, T.D Williamsb, Z. Xuc