Heroin (diamorphine) supported treatment in Germany ...Heroin (diamorphine) supported treatment in...

29
Heroin (diamorphine) supported treatment Heroin (diamorphine) supported treatment in Germany: Results and problems of implementation in Germany: Results and problems of implementation Dr. Ingo Ilja Michels Head of the Office of the Federal Drug Commissioner Federal Ministry of Health Berlin Germany Berlin, Germany 20th International Confrerence on the Reduction of Drug Related Harms Bangkok (Thailand), 20 April, 2009

Transcript of Heroin (diamorphine) supported treatment in Germany ...Heroin (diamorphine) supported treatment in...

Heroin (diamorphine) supported treatment Heroin (diamorphine) supported treatment in Germany: Results and problems of implementationin Germany: Results and problems of implementation

Dr. Ingo Ilja MichelsHead of the Office of the

Federal Drug CommissionerFederal Ministry of Health

Berlin GermanyBerlin, Germany

20th International Confrerence on the Reduction of Drug

Related HarmsBangkok (Thailand), 20 April, 2009

The German heroinThe German heroin assisted treatment trialassisted treatment trialThe German heroinThe German heroin--assisted treatment trial assisted treatment trial for Opioid dependentsfor Opioid dependents

Results of the scientific studyResults of the scientific studyComparison of control groupsComparison of control groups

HeroinHeroin-- vs Methadone Treatmentvs Methadone TreatmentHeroinHeroin-- vs. Methadone Treatmentvs. Methadone Treatment

Scientific study groupScientific study groupDr. Christian Haasen, Dr. Uwe Verthein, Dr. Peter Degkwitz, Prof. Dr. Christian Haasen, Dr. Uwe Verthein, Dr. Peter Degkwitz, Prof.

Dr. Dieter NaberDr. Dieter NaberCenter for Interdisciplinary Addiction ResearchCenter for Interdisciplinary Addiction ResearchCenter for Interdisciplinary Addiction ResearchCenter for Interdisciplinary Addiction Research

University of Hamburg University of Hamburg

Background informationBackground informationBackground informationBackground informationE ti t d b f O i idE ti t d b f O i idEstimated number of Opioid users: approx. Estimated number of Opioid users: approx. 150150..000000R h d b d f t t tR h d b d f t t t 1010 000000Reached by drug free treatment: approx. Reached by drug free treatment: approx. 1010..000 000 Reached by Opioid Substitution Treatment Reached by Opioid Substitution Treatment (OST)(OST) 7575 000000 ((7070% M th d% M th d 2828 %%(OST): approx. (OST): approx. 7575..000 000 ((7070% Methadone, % Methadone, 28 28 % % Buprenorphin, Buprenorphin, 22% Codeine)% Codeine)Obj ti f th Di hi St d t hObj ti f th Di hi St d t hObjective of the Diamorphine Study: to reach Objective of the Diamorphine Study: to reach those who are not in treatment and those who those who are not in treatment and those who are not benefitting from OST (low retention rateare not benefitting from OST (low retention rateare not benefitting from OST (low retention rate, are not benefitting from OST (low retention rate, high rate of additional substance use)high rate of additional substance use)

Study AimsStudy AimsyyPositive Effects concerning:Positive Effects concerning:–– improvement of physical and mental healthimprovement of physical and mental healthimprovement of physical and mental healthimprovement of physical and mental health–– reduction of additional use of psychoactive drugsreduction of additional use of psychoactive drugs–– reduction of delinquencyreduction of delinquencyreduction of delinquencyreduction of delinquency–– accessability and retention in therapyaccessability and retention in therapy–– getget--out of drugout of drug--related contactsrelated contactsgege ou o d ugou o d ug e a ed co ac se a ed co ac s–– social stabilization: new drugsocial stabilization: new drug--free contacts, improved skills free contacts, improved skills

for jobtaking, financial security, stabilization of housingfor jobtaking, financial security, stabilization of housing–– readiness for additional (psychoreadiness for additional (psycho--) therapeutical treatment) therapeutical treatment

screening and study inclusionscreening and study inclusionscreening and study inclusionscreening and study inclusionScreening (N=2.083) T-1 Untersuchung (N=1.272)Randomisierung (N=1.032) in Analyse (N=1.015)

700

800

500

600

300

400

100

200

0HH Hann Fft Köln Bonn Ka Mü

Methadone FailuresMethadone Failures NonNon ReachedReached

Target Group CharacteristicsTarget Group CharacteristicsMethadone FailuresMethadone Failures NonNon--ReachedReached

sex, percentage of mensex, percentage of men 78%78% 82%82%mean agemean age 36,9 y36,9 y 35,9 y35,9 ygg yy yyage at first Heroin consumptionage at first Heroin consumption 19,8 y19,8 y 20,5 y20,5 yHepatitis C / HIV +Hepatitis C / HIV + 84% / 11%84% / 11% 79% / 7%79% / 7%t bl h i it tit bl h i it ti 75% 64%75% 64%stable housing situationstable housing situation 75% 64%75% 64%

steady partnershipsteady partnership 34%34% 30%30%childrenchildren 35%35% 40%40%childrenchildren 35%35% 40%40%professional training completed professional training completed 45%45% 44%44%employment last 30 day employment last 30 day 15%15% 11%11%debtsdebts 85%85% 81%81%ever convictedever convicted 97%97% 96%96%

Target Group ChracteristicsTarget Group ChracteristicsMethadone Failures Methadone Failures NonNon--ReachedReached

ever in custody or sentenced to prisonever in custody or sentenced to prison 7575%% 7474%%y py p-- for narcotics offencesfor narcotics offences:: 4343%% 3636%%-- for procuring offences: for procuring offences: 3333% % 3434%%years of heroin useyears of heroin use 1414..33 1313years of cocaine use years of cocaine use 66..00 55..11years of multiple useyears of multiple use 1414..22 1212..88intravenous use last intravenous use last 30 30 days days 2020..00 2626..55d d ( b )d d ( b ) 55 99 55 66drug overdoses (average number)drug overdoses (average number) 55..99 55..66money spent on drugs last 30 days (Euro) 810810 11..324324

Additional psychoAdditional psycho--social supportsocial supportAdditional psychoAdditional psycho--social supportsocial supportCase management with integratedCase management with integratedCase management with integrated Case management with integrated motivational interviewing motivational interviewing (case management (case management as structured, personas structured, person--centred, followcentred, follow--up care up care interventionintervention))

Drug counselling with pschoeducationDrug counselling with pschoeducation(weekly group sessions(weekly group sessions 1212 and subsequentand subsequent(weekly group sessions (weekly group sessions –– 12 12 -- and subsequent and subsequent refreshing sessions based on manualised treatment refreshing sessions based on manualised treatment program requiring patients‘ active involvement andprogram requiring patients‘ active involvement andprogram, requiring patients active involvement and program, requiring patients active involvement and learning appropriate coping strategies to improve learning appropriate coping strategies to improve social competrency quality of life coping with illnesssocial competrency quality of life coping with illnesssocial competrency, quality of life, coping with illness social competrency, quality of life, coping with illness related problems, compliance with treatment)related problems, compliance with treatment)

primary outcome measuresprimary outcome measuresprimary outcome measuresprimary outcome measures

(A)(A) improvement of health, both improvement of health, both physical and mental healthphysical and mental healthp yp y

ANDAND(B)(B) d ti f th ti fd ti f th ti f(B)(B) reduction of the consumption of reduction of the consumption of street heroinstreet heroin ANDAND no increase of no increase of cocaine consumptioncocaine consumption

HeroinHeroin--supported treatment supported treatment Heroin outpatient clinic in Hanover

Waiting Room Intake Group Room Application Room

Model project HeroinModel project Heroin--assisted treatmentassisted treatmentStudy sites in Hamburg Bonn KarlsruheStudy sites in Hamburg Bonn KarlsruheStudy sites in Hamburg, Bonn, KarlsruheStudy sites in Hamburg, Bonn, Karlsruhe

Model project HeroinModel project Heroin--assisted treatmentassisted treatmentStudy site in Frankfurt a MStudy site in Frankfurt a MStudy site in Frankfurt a MStudy site in Frankfurt a M

Model project HeroinModel project Heroin--assisted treatmentassisted treatmentStudy site in Frankfurt a MStudy site in Frankfurt a MStudy site in Frankfurt a MStudy site in Frankfurt a M

retention rateretention rateretention rateretention rateHeroin Methadon

80%

100%

60%

80%

40%

0%

20%

0%0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Monat

Assessment of Physical HealthAssessment of Physical Health (OTI)(OTI)Assessment of Physical Health Assessment of Physical Health (OTI)(OTI)

H i M th d

20

Heroin Methadon

15

1010

5T-1 T0 T1 T3 T6 T12

Significant improvement of health,Slightly better in the Heroin group

Assessment of Physical Health Assessment of Physical Health (OTI)(OTI) (BMI)(BMI)(N=156)(N=156)

30

OTI-HSS BMI

25

30

/ BM

I

Follow-up-Analysis: Pillai=0 555 p<0 001

20

mpt

ome Follow-up-Analysis: Pillai=0,555, p<0,001

10

15

zahl

Sym

F ll A l i Pill i 0 822 <0 001

5T 1 T12 T24 T36 T48

An Follow-up-Analysis: Pillai=0,822, p<0,001

T-1 T12 T24 T36 T48

ZISPhase 1 Phase 2| | Follow-up Phase

Assessment of Mental HealthAssessment of Mental Health(SCL(SCL--9090--R)R)

Heroin Methadon

1,4

Heroin Methadon

1

1,2

0,8

1

0 4

0,6

0,4T-1 T1 T3 T6 T12

Significant improvement in both goups,Slightly better in the Heroin group

Assessment of Mental HealthAssessment of Mental Health(SCL(SCL--9090--R)(GSI)R)(GSI) (N=(N=156156))

4 100

SCL-90-R, GSI GAFS

3SI 80Follow-up-Analysis: Pillai=0,485, p<0,001

2

90-R

, GS

60

AFS

1SC

L-9

20

40 G

Follow-up-Analysis: Pillai=0,667, p<0,001

0 0

20p y , , p ,

T-1 T12 T24 T36 T48

ZISPhase 1 Phase 2| | Follow-up Phase

Consumption of street heroinConsumption of street heroinpp(last (last 30 30 days)days)

25

Heroin Methadon

20

10

15

5

0T-1 T0 T1 T3 T6 T12

Significant reduction of street heroin consumption,especially in the Heroin group

Consumption of cocaine Consumption of cocaine (l t 30 d )(l t 30 d )(last 30 days)(last 30 days)

H i M th d

25

Heroin Methadon

15

20

10

15

5

0T-1 T0 T1 T3 T6 T12

Stable reduction of cocaine consumption in both groups

drugconsumption last 30 daysdrugconsumption last 30 daysg p yg p y(N=156)(N=156)

100%

Straßenheroin Kokain i.v.-Konsum

80%

100%

60%

C h T t Q 89 3 <0 001Cochran-Test: Q=263,9, p<0,001

20%

40% Cochran-Test: Q=89,3, p<0,001

0%T 1 T12 T24 T36 T48

Cochran-Test: Q=372,6, p<0,001

T-1 T12 T24 T36 T48

ZISPhase 1 Phase 2| | Follow-up Phase

drugconsumption, urine analysis drugconsumption, urine analysis (N=156)(N=156)

60% 60%

30%

40%

50%

30%

40%

50%

CocaineCocaine

10%

20%

10%

20%BenzodiazepinesBenzodiazepines

0%-1 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48

60%

0%-1 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48

60%

30%

40%

50%

30%

40%

50%AmphetaminesAmphetamines

10%

20%

30%

10%

20%

30%

CannabisCannabis

ZIS

0%-1 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48

0%-1 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48

actual in jobactual in jobjj(N=(N=156156))

50%

40%

20%

30%

Cochran-Test: Q=38,8, p<0,001

10%

20%

0%T 1 T12 T24 T36 T48T-1 T12 T24 T36 T48

ZISPhase 1 Phase 2| | Follow-up Phase

DosageDosageDosageDosageHeroin-Dosis

500

400

n m

g

200

300

esdo

sis

in

100Tag

01 31 61 91 121 151 181 211 241 271 301 331 361

Tageg

Average: stable heroin dosage slightly decreasing

medical safetymedical safety

Severe adverse events:Severe adverse events:Severe adverse events:Severe adverse events:Heroin: 58Heroin: 58 Methadon: 15Methadon: 15 (4:1)(4:1)

not unexpected: caused by intravenous application (cerebral not unexpected: caused by intravenous application (cerebral convulsions respiratory depressions)convulsions respiratory depressions)convulsions, respiratory depressions)convulsions, respiratory depressions)deaths (all withoutdeaths (all without casual relationship to study treatment or casual relationship to study treatment or study medication)study medication) ::

H i 5H i 5 M th d 7M th d 7Heroin: 5Heroin: 5 Methadon: 7Methadon: 7Mortality 1% (expected mortality >3%)Mortality 1% (expected mortality >3%)Slightly higher safety risk is justifying:Slightly higher safety risk is justifying:g y g y j y gg y g y j y g–– Treatment only in specialized clinics, not by GP‘sTreatment only in specialized clinics, not by GP‘s–– no takeno take--home provisionhome provision

Main results of the model project of a heroin assisted treatment studyy

the group of severely ill heroin addicts could be successfully the group of severely ill heroin addicts could be successfully recruited;recruited;recruited;recruited;the retention rate is higher in the heroin group;the retention rate is higher in the heroin group;the heroin treatment group showed significantly better results the heroin treatment group showed significantly better results g p g yg p g ywith respect to improvement of health and reduction of illicit with respect to improvement of health and reduction of illicit drug use;drug use;TheThe effectseffects are largely independent of the target groupare largely independent of the target groupThe The effectseffects are largely independent of the target group, are largely independent of the target group, psychopsycho--social intervention form and study center;social intervention form and study center;Heroin treatment is as effective for ,notHeroin treatment is as effective for ,not--reached drug users’ reached drug users’

f ‘ th d t t t f il ’f ‘ th d t t t f il ’as for ‘methadone treatment failures’;as for ‘methadone treatment failures’;Positive developments are also seen in other areas such as Positive developments are also seen in other areas such as criminality and social contactscriminality and social contactsyy

patients in Heroin treatmentpatients in Heroin treatment

Possible scenarios for implementationPossible scenarios for implementationComprehensive treatment and longComprehensive treatment and long--term care conceptterm care concept

Treatment Service CharacteristicsTreatment Service Characteristics

A di t i di id l dA di t i di id l d22 D tiD ti

Severe problem profilesSevere problem profiles1.1. Patient inclusion criteriaPatient inclusion criteriaTreatment Service CharacteristicsTreatment Service Characteristics

Highly specialized comprehensive Highly specialized comprehensive treatment and care settingstreatment and care settings

3.3. FacilityFacilityAccording to individual needsAccording to individual needs2.2. DurationDuration

Earlier MM/HT according to Earlier MM/HT according to individual problem profile (limited individual problem profile (limited or as longor as long--term care)term care)

4.4. MedicationMedication

Individual need assessmentIndividual need assessmentDisorder specific behavior therapy Disorder specific behavior therapy components (with medication)components (with medication)

5.5. Psychological treatmentPsychological treatmentgg ))

Individual needsIndividual needs6.6. Social supportSocial supportcomponents (with medication)components (with medication)

LongLong--term, proactive case term, proactive case 7.7. Overall treatment conceptOverall treatment conceptmanagementmanagement

Final Decision of the ParliamentFinal Decision of the ParliamentFinal Decision of the ParliamentFinal Decision of the ParliamentDi i th i l t ti f th di hiDi i th i l t ti f th di hiDiscussion on the implementation of the diamorphineDiscussion on the implementation of the diamorphine--supported treatment in the German parliament between supported treatment in the German parliament between the partners of the „great coalition“ (christian the partners of the „great coalition“ (christian p „g (p „g (democrats/social democrats), although most of the study democrats/social democrats), although most of the study cities are governed by the christian democrats cities are governed by the christian democrats (conservatives) the christian democrats in the national(conservatives) the christian democrats in the national(conservatives) the christian democrats in the national (conservatives) the christian democrats in the national Parliament are against the implementationParliament are against the implementationThere will be a decision of the parliament soon, based by There will be a decision of the parliament soon, based by e e be a dec s o o e pa a e soo , based bye e be a dec s o o e pa a e soo , based bya common draft for an amendment of the narcotic law of a common draft for an amendment of the narcotic law of the social democrats together with the „opposition the social democrats together with the „opposition parties“parties“ liberals left green (ecologists)liberals left green (ecologists)parties parties -- liberals, left, green (ecologists)liberals, left, green (ecologists)