Heradstveit Bonham (2007) - What the Axis of Evil Metaphor Did to Iran
-
Upload
kiemenhund -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
0
Transcript of Heradstveit Bonham (2007) - What the Axis of Evil Metaphor Did to Iran
8/2/2019 Heradstveit Bonham (2007) - What the Axis of Evil Metaphor Did to Iran
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/heradstveit-bonham-2007-what-the-axis-of-evil-metaphor-did-to-iran 1/21
What the Axis of Evil Metaphor Did to IranAuthor(s): Daniel Heradstveit and G. Matthew BonhamReviewed work(s):Source: Middle East Journal, Vol. 61, No. 3 (Summer, 2007), pp. 421-440Published by: Middle East InstituteStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4330418 .
Accessed: 17/04/2012 08:59
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
Middle East Institute is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Middle East
Journal.
http://www.jstor.org
8/2/2019 Heradstveit Bonham (2007) - What the Axis of Evil Metaphor Did to Iran
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/heradstveit-bonham-2007-what-the-axis-of-evil-metaphor-did-to-iran 2/21
What heAxis of Evil MetaphorDid to Iran
Daniel HeradstveitandG. MatthewBonham
This articlefocuses on theAxis of Evil metaphor hatwas used by PresidentGeorgeWBush n his Stateof the UnionAddressn 2002 to represent ran,Iraq,
andNorthKorea.Afterdescribing"axis"as a metonymorfascismand Nazism,
and "evil" as a metonym or Satanic orces that impliesan alliance of Iran,
Iraq,and NorthKorea hat is collectivelyresponsibleor evildeeds,theauthors
analyzetheimpactof thismetaphor nIranian elf-imageandpolitics.Thedata
for this analysisaredrawnromin-depth nterviews onductedwith18 members
of the Iranianoppositionalelite. TheinterviewresultssuggestthattheAxis of
Evilmetaphorhadan impacton politicaldiscourse nIranandstrengthenedhe
rhetorical ositionofconservatives is-a'-viseformers y revivingmilitant evo-
lutionaryanguagewiththeGreatSatan(the UnitedStates)as themaintargetof
the theocraticand conservativeorces. Thearticleconcludeswithsome obser-
vationsaboutthe implicationsof usingculturaland historicalexperiencesor
explainingdifferences etween he ways nwhichAmericans and otherpeople in
theWest) nd Iranianshaveunderstoodhemetaphor
In hisarticle,we focuson theAxis of Evilas a creativemetaphor;hat s, a metaphor
that s capableof givingus a new view of the world.'Metaphors the firststep in theconstruction f suchnovel understandings,speciallythose that change theway we
see ourworld.2The restructuringftenbegins with a vague idea that has long been
DanielHeradstveits Professor ndSeniorResearchAssociateat theNorwegian nstitute f InternationalAffairs.He hasheldpositionsas Professor f International elationsatJohnsHopkinsUniversityn Bo-logna, Professorof Comparative olitics at the Universityof Bergen,andvisitingprofessorat SyracuseUniversity.He is theauthoror co-author f ninebookson the MiddleEast,semiotics,andpoliticalpsy-chology.His latestbook is Oil in theGulf:Obstacles oDemocracy ndDevelopment,o-editedby Helge
Hveem (Oxford:Ashgate,2004). G. MatthewBonham s Professor f PoliticalScienceandChairof theInternational elationsProgram t the MaxwellSchoolof SyracuseUniversity.He hasdoneresearch ntheMiddleEastandCentralAsia,Norwegian il policy,relationsbetween heUnitedStatesandRussia,and theexpansionof theEuropeanUnion.He is currentlyonducting esearch n communicativespectsof the"War n Terrorism." is recentresearchhas beenpublishedn InternationaltudiesQuarterly,n-ternational tudiesPerspectives,s wellas a number f anthologies.Thiss arevisedversionof a paper hatwaspresented tthe 461Annual nternationaltudiesAssociationConvention,Honolulu,March1-5,2005.It is based, npart,on a larger eport, ranand theAxisofEvil,NUPIResearchReportNo.277, September2003. Theresearch,whichwasconducted s partof theProjectGrouporStudies nthe PersianGulfof theNorwegian nstitute f Internationalffairs NUPI), was supported y the NorwegianResearchCouncil(ProjectNo. 144705-510), he NorwegianMinistryof ForeignAffairs,andNUPI's ResearchGroupon
TerrorismndInternationalrime.Theauthorswouldlike to thankNaghmehSohrabi orherassistancewith the research.
1. "In the metaphoricalstatement ... the contextualaction creates a new meaning, which trulyhas the status of event since it exists only in the presentcontext ... In this way, the innovationof an
emergentmeaningcanbe takenas a linguistic creation.Andif it is adoptedby a significantpartof thelinguisticcommunity, t in turncan become a common meaning and add to the polysemy of lexicalentities."PaulRicoeur,Ruleof Metaphor Toronto:Universityof TorontoPress, 1977), p. 99.
2. Ricoeurrefersto the "symbolthat gives rise to thought.""It s this articulation f thoughtposit-
MIDDLEEAST JOURNAL* VOLUME61, NO. 3, SUMMER2007 [Continuedon nextpage]
8/2/2019 Heradstveit Bonham (2007) - What the Axis of Evil Metaphor Did to Iran
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/heradstveit-bonham-2007-what-the-axis-of-evil-metaphor-did-to-iran 3/21
422 * MIDDLEEASTJOURNAL
neglected,such as an "Axis." n this respecttheAxis of Evil metaphor s a kind of
cognitivebreakthrough,n effort o restructureheinternationalystemas it wasinthe
1930s - an attempt o see theworld hrough he eyes of thatperiod.Recalling he Sec-
ond WorldWar, heAxis Powersareevil,andtheimplications thatsomethingmustbe
done about hem.If youfindthemetaphorobecompelling, henyoumustact. Infact,metaphor anctionsactionsandhelpsto buildgoals.3Metaphor utsan end to debate
once you follow it to its conclusion,andthentheimplications oraction are obvious.
A senioradvisor o PresidentBush hasacknowledged he implications f this view in
an interviewwith a journalist.He said,"We'rean empirenow,and when we act,we
createourownreality judiciously, asyouwill - we'll actagain,creatingothernew
realities,whichyoucanstudy oo,andthat'showthingssortout. We'rehistory'sactors
... and you,all of you,will be lefttojust studywhatwe do."4
The contributionf thisarticle s its focus on both thetargetof a metaphor, nd
its source.5While the metaphormay re-structurehe way the West views Iran, t also
re-structureshewaytheIranians iew theworld,and,moreimportantly,hemselves.
The Axis of Evil metaphor ivides the world nto twoparts: hose whobelievein the
metaphor ndthose who do not.However,whetheryoubelieve n themetaphor rnot,
it changesthe way you viewyour world.For example, he targetsof the Axis of Evil
maynot takethemetaphor eriously,buttheydon'twant o bepartof "Evil."Forthem
the sourceof themetaphormayalsobecomethe sourceof evil.
THEAXISOF EVILSPEECH6
In his Stateof the UnionAddressto Congresson January 9, 2002, President
Bush used the expression, heAxis of Evil, to includeIraq,Iran,and North Korea:
"States ikethese,andtheir errorist llies,constitute nAxis of Evil, arming o threat-
en thepeaceof theworld.By seekingweaponsof massdestruction,heseregimespose
a graveandgrowingdanger."7
[Continuedfrompreviouspage]ing and thinking thatconstitutes the critical point of our whole enterprise."PaulRicoeur, The Sym-
bolism of Evil, tr. EmersonBuchanan New York:Harperand Row, 1967), pp. 348-349. Ricoeuralso
discusses the power of metaphor o "redescribe eality."PaulRicoeur,TheRule of Metaphor,p. 6.
3. George Lakoff and Mark Johnson,MetaphorsWe Live By (Chicago: Universityof Chicago
Press, 1980), p. 142. The authorswould like to thankVictor M. Sergeev for describing how new
metaphorscan change one's ontology of the world.
4. RonSuskind, "Without Doubt,"TheNew YorkTimes,October17, 2004.
5. The natureof metaphoricalmappings s describedby Lakoff: "Ametaphoricmapping nvolves
a source domain anda targetdomain.The sourcedomain is assumedto be structured y a proposi-
tional or image-schematicmodel.The mapping s typically partial; t mapsthe structure f the ICM
[idealizedcognitivemodel] in the sourcedomainonto a corresponding tructuren thetargetdomain."
See George Lakoff, Women,Fire, and Dangerous Things:WhatCategories Reveal About the Mind
(Chicago:Universityof Chicago Press, 1986), p. 288.
6. An earlierversion of thisanalysis of the Axis of Evil speech andmetaphorwas publishedby the
authors n G. MatthewBonham and Daniel Heradstveit,"The 'Axis of Evil' Metaphorand the Re-
structuring f IranianViewsToward he US," Vaseteh Journalof the EuropeanSociety or Iranian
Studies,Vol. 1,No. 1 (2005), pp. 89-105.
7. "NorthKorea s a regime armingwith missiles andweaponsof mass destruction,while starv-
ing its citizens. Iranaggressively pursuesthese weapons andexportsterror,while an unelectedfew[Continuedon nextpage]
8/2/2019 Heradstveit Bonham (2007) - What the Axis of Evil Metaphor Did to Iran
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/heradstveit-bonham-2007-what-the-axis-of-evil-metaphor-did-to-iran 4/21
WHATTHEAXISOFEVILMETAPHORIDTOIRAN* 423
Thephrase tself was constructed y DavidFrum,a WhiteHousespeechwriter,
who came up with "Axis of Hatred"o describe he linkagebetweenIraqand terror-
ism.Frum'sboss, MichaelGerson, hanged hephrase o Axis of Evil tomake t sound"moresinister,even wicked."8Later Condoleezza
Rice,PresidentBush's
NationalSecurityAdvisor,andStephenHadley,DeputyNationalSecurityAdvisor,suggestedaddingNorthKoreaand Iranas partof theAxis. Hadleyhad secondthoughtsabout
addingIran,because t had a democraticallylectedpresident, ut Bush liked theidea
of including ran."'No,'thepresident aid, 'I want it in."'9 n an interviewwithBob
Woodward,Bushlater elaborated is reasoningbehind ncludingIran:"And he fact
that hepresident f the UnitedStateswould standupandsayIran s justlikeIraqand
NorthKorea in otherwordsyou'vegot a problem andthepresidents willingtocall it, is partof howyoudeal with Iran.And thatwill inspire hosewho love freedom
insidethecountry."'0Intheend,PresidentBush's senioradvisors, uch as KarlRove,thought hat he
Axisof Evil wasa signature hrase,"adeclaration.. that hecountrynowwouldhave
a greatmission. It was big, new,and different.""Althoughsome doubtedwhether twould makesenseto linkthe threecountries,hemetaphorwasregarded y the Pres-ident'sadvisorsas a "watershed"hatwoulddefine theproblemn "graphic, iblicaltermswithoutpubliclycommittingo a particularolution."'2
The use of the phraseAxis of Evil was a restructuringf theAmericanunder-
standingof the "War nTerror,"n which the focusshifted romUsamabin Ladinand
al-Qa'ida,with theirallies and bases in Afghanistan,o a series of otherstates,whoseinvolvementn thatoperation anged romminimal o non-existent.Theuncharitable
might inkthis shiftto the failure o catchUsamabinLadin, n that heAdministrationhada need to show that t wasstill"doing omething,"venif thatsomethingwasun-connectedwithbringing he WorldTradeCenterattackersojustice.Thekeyconceptsin thisrestructuringavebeenfirstly"terroristtates,"which mpliesthe"indivisibilityof terrorism"'3ndtherefore hat hecollectiveresponsibilityor9/1 1 is onanystatesodesignated; ndsecondly,weaponsof massdestruction,ecauseanyonewhopossessesthemmaybe tempted o sell orgive themto terrorists,husevoking earsof chemical,biological,orevennuclearattacksonAmerican ities.However,anyonewhoalreadypossesses nuclearweapons is immunefromattack,as for instancePakistan,whose
military ntelligenceservice was the chief sponsorof theTaliban, ndpossiblyNorthKorea.
Thetoposof "terroristtateswithweaponsof massdestruction"s therefore on-finedto hostilestatesthatmay, at some time in the future,acquirenuclearweapons
[Continuedfrompreviouspage]repress heIranianpeople'shopeforfreedom.Iraqcontinuesto flaunt ts hostility towardAmericaandto support error." residentGeorgeW.Bush, State of the UnionAddress,January29, 2002.
8. Bob Woodward,Plan ofAttack(NewYork:Simon andSchuster,2004), p. 87.9. Woodward,Plan ofAttack,p. 88.
10.Woodward,Plan ofAttack,p. 88.
11.Woodward,Plan ofAttack,p. 90.
12.Woodward,Plan ofAttack,pp.93-94.
13.The phrase,"indivisibilityof terrorism,"was used by RupertCornwell,"HowWar n theMid-dle EastRoils TransatlanticRelations,"EuropeanAffairs,Vol. 3, No. 2 (2002).
8/2/2019 Heradstveit Bonham (2007) - What the Axis of Evil Metaphor Did to Iran
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/heradstveit-bonham-2007-what-the-axis-of-evil-metaphor-did-to-iran 5/21
424 * MIDDLEEASTJOURNAL
whichtheymay,at sometime inthefuture,possiblybetemptedo bestowon terrorists.
Iranmost definitelyqualifiesunder hesecriteria,nthat t is considered hostilestate,
has a nuclearprogram, ndcannotprove hat t will not so bestow heseweapons.'4 he
Americangovernment's pproacho the burdenof proofwas amplydemonstratedn
the caseof Iraq,where t asserted hatneither he UnitedStatesnor theUN needed o
provethatIraqhad WMDs, but thatthe Iraqishadto provethattheydidnot, and that
anyevidencepresentedwas fake.
Two otherreasons orgranting ranmembershipn theAxis of Evil areprobably
first, the theocracy'sgeneralhostility to the United States (opposition o Goodmust
necessarilybeEvil)andsecond, tsattitude owardserrorism;enerally,hatIrandoes
not consider he Palestinians'truggleagainst he Israelis o constitute errorism, nd
specifically,hecountry's upportorHizbullahn Lebanon.
THEAXIS OF EVILMETAPHOR
Manyobserversn the UnitedStatesandEuropewere both amusedandpuzzled
by PresidentBush'suse of thephrase,Axis of Evil. Someregardedhephraseasjust
emptyrhetoric hatwasdesigned o appeal o domesticaudiencesn the UnitedStates.
Forexample, hephrasespawned he "Axisof Evil Cookbook,"whichwaspublished
by the NthPosition,an on-line magazine.'5Althoughthis phrasemay have been an
inventionof the President's peech writers, t containsmetonymicconceptsthat are
groundedn experienceand,like metaphors, structureotjust ourlanguagebut alsoourthoughts,attitudes, ndactions."'6
Bush used the word"evil" ive times in this speech,three imesreferringo en-
emies. He also used it in his speechto the nationon September11,2001, and a week
laterhe described errorists o Congressas "planning vil."In Novemberof thatyear
Bushtold Newsweek hatSaddamwas also "evil."These areclearexamplesof demoni-
zation,and one of the reasons hephrase he Axis of Evil attracted o muchcriticism
and s said to have doneso muchdamage s thatcallingothercountries vil is not gen-
erallyconsideredo be thelanguageof diplomacy.There s probably necho of Ronald
Reagan's abelof "EvilEmpire" or the Soviet Union, which wasequallycriticizedat
thetime. It is possiblethatmanyAmericans emi-consciously magine hat,since theEvilEmpires no longerwithus,theapplication f such a label hasa beneficent ffect
thatcan be repeatedn thecase of the newenemies.Thismaybe connectedwith the
rise of fundamentalist hristianity, hichis encouraging hemto see worldpolitics n
eschatologicalerms.
14. At first the United Statesconcentratedon the Iraniannucleardevelopment,with Russianas-sistance,of a nuclearpower station n Bushehr.The UnitedStatesbelieved that this facility could be
used to producenuclearweapons. Subsequently,the United States learnedto its own surprise hat
Iranhad a nuclear weaponsdevelopment programnear the city of Natanz.Secretaryof StateColin
Powell used this as anexample of how a country,determined o develop nuclearweapons, couldkeep
the process hidden from inspectorsandother outsiders. "Powell Says Iran Is PursuingBomb,"The
WashingtonPost, November 18, 2004, p. AO1.
15. See Val Stevenson,"The Axis of Evil Cookbook,"http://www.nthposition.comlaxis_booklet.
pdf.
16.Lakoff andJohnson,MetaphorsWeLive By, p. 39.
8/2/2019 Heradstveit Bonham (2007) - What the Axis of Evil Metaphor Did to Iran
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/heradstveit-bonham-2007-what-the-axis-of-evil-metaphor-did-to-iran 6/21
WHATTHEAXISOFEVILMETAPHORIDTOIRAN* 425
CertainlyBushand someof his advisors,as evangelicalChristians,mayhaveatendency owards dualisticviewof life, as a strugglebetweenGood andEvil,withnomiddleground."Thosewho are notwithus, areagainstus,"he told the moresecularEuropeans,who insist on tryingto understand situation's omplexities.'7
Althoughthe use of theword"evil" orflyinghijackedaircraft ntocivilianbuildingswill strikemanypeopleasjustified, t is thecorollary, heother side of theeschatological oin,which s especiallydangerous:heassumptionhat he divisionof GoodandEvilcoin-cideswith the divisionbetweenUs andThem.Consequently,nthisdualisticpictureoftheworld, he UnitedStates s a Force orGood,even theForceforGood.Thismeansthatanything t chooses to do is Good andanything hatoffendsor inconveniencest
is Evil.
Theimportanthingabout he "evil" omponent f themetaphors thatevil hasno
specificgoal - exceptto produce vil. As anontological orce evil has nointerestsofits ownexcept the interests elated o its destination:hat s whyall negotiationswithevil arefruitless.There s nowaytomakea dealwithevil,excepttoinclude nthis dealeven a greater vil, notforyoubut forothers.Therefore,heForcesof Evil have to bedestroyed otallyby theForcesof Good.Moreover,heabsurdunityof suchdifferentpolitical orces as IranandNorthKorea eemnot to be so absurd,f youagreewiththeprinciple f theUnity of Evil.If there s only oneevil,all of its incarnationsresimplythedifferent ormsof oneforce anargumentwhich s veryeasyto understand henyouaccept he dualisticontology.Heretheontologicalchangesproduced y metaphor
areobvious.'8TheAxiscomponent anbeconsidered nseveralevels. Inthefirstplace, t is an
incoherentmetaphor, s anaxis is a straightine; thefigurative seis, in fact,takennotfromCartesian eometry thex andy axeson a graph)butfromtheaxisof theEarth'srotation.Anaxisaroundwhichsomething evolvess madebytwopoints;youcanhavethreepoints oinedin a triangle,but thennothingcanrevolvearounda triangle.Thisgeometrical sageactuallyderives roma misunderstoodmodificationo themetaphorshortlyafter t wascoined.
TheoriginalAxiswas thatbetweenHitler'sGermany ndMussolini's taly.Orig-inallyrivals, heyweredriven ogetherby theWesternPowers'hostility o theremili-tarization f theRhineland ndtheconquestof Ethiopia. n 1936theyannouncedhathenceforthheworldwouldrevolvearoundheRome-BerlinAxis. Germany ndItalythusbecame"theAxis Powers."OnNovember1, 1936Mussolinireported n thehis-toricagreementbetweenGermany ndItaly,and he said,"ThisBerlin-Rome erticalline is notanobstaclebutrather naxis aroundwhich canrevolveall thoseEuropeanstateswitha will tocollaboration ndpeace."'9 fter hesignature f thetripartite nti-
17. On September16, 2001, President Bush stated, in response to a question about homelandsecurityand civil rights, "Thisis a new kind of - a new kindof evil. And we understand.And theAmericanpeople are beginningto understand.This crusade,this waron terrorism s going to takea while." "Remarksby the PresidentUpon Arrival,"September16, 2001, http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/09/20010916-2.html.
18. The authorswould like to thankVictor M. Sergeevfor these insights aboutthe Axis of Evilmetaphor.
19. Benito Mussolini, Edoardoand Duilio Susmel, eds., Opera Omnia (Florence, 1951-1960,Rome, 1978-1980), Volume28, pp.67-72.
8/2/2019 Heradstveit Bonham (2007) - What the Axis of Evil Metaphor Did to Iran
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/heradstveit-bonham-2007-what-the-axis-of-evil-metaphor-did-to-iran 7/21
426 * MIDDLEEASTJOURNAL
ComintemPact ater n the year,Japanwas called an Axis Power oo, but in fact there
was no strategic ollaboration etween he EuropeanAxis andthe Japanese.
The metaphor as thusbeen a logical absurdity uta powerfulaffective ool since
1936. "Axis" vokes "our" nemiesof theSecondWorldWar,and it is a metonym orNazism andfascism.20 his historical esonance s the secondlevel.Nobody today n
polite societycansay anything oodabout heAxisPowers,andanyonecomparedwith
them s stigmatized.
A thirdand related evel is that theAxis metaphor mplies the alliance of the
countries ncludedn it.Given heintenseantipathy etween raqandIran,andthelack
of muchvisibleconnectionbetweeneitherand NorthKorea, hetropehas occasioned
much ridicule,withTV and internetwits grouping ogether ripletsof countriesal-
legedly offendedat beingleft out of the Axis. In theory,we mightspeakof the world
revolvingaroundan axis of inveteratenemies, n the sense thattheirquarrels whatpowers nternational olitics.Thatwouldbe a reasonable se of themetaphor, ndus-
ingit for pre-2003Iran-IraqwithoutNorthKorea)wouldnot be inappropriate,utthe
public consensusseemsto be thatthis is not in fact what PresidentBushmeant.Nor
would sucha use have muchmobilizingpower.It appears ather hatBush wasusing
theAxismetaphorn theoriginal ense,tosuggest hatIraq, ran,andNorthKoreawere
notonlyEvil countriesn themselves,butwerein alliancewithoneanother gainst he
restof us. Inotherwords,this is notmerelyEvilbut a conspiracyof Evil. Demoniza-
tion and conspiracy heoriesalways go hand n hand; hehumanmindappearso be
naturallynclined o weave allperceivedhreatsntoa single pattern.In thiswaythe Axis of Evil conceptallows a return o the bipolarworldof the
201 century,when all one's enemieswere fronts or Internationalewry, nternational
Capitalism,or InternationalCommunism, ccording o variousnarratives. t allows
Americans o think hat"evil" s a featureof particular eographical egions, araway
countriesaboutwhichtheyknowlittle,and thus notof Texasor Wyoming,which are
partof the Kingdomof Good. It suggeststhat terrorism s something hatis mostly
createdorpromotedby a list of countriesacting n concert,butwhosememberships
notfixedforever.We caneasily envisage heAxisof Evil intheyear2010 beingtwo or
threecountriesother hanIraq, ran,andNorthKorea.
Finally,we may note how the use of the tropesof the Waron Terrorand the
Axis of Evil in the samerhetorical iscourse ervesto imply,withoutactually tating,
that the Axis is collectively responsible for the attacksof 9/11. The attemptto acquire
weaponsof massdestruction,hepromotion f radical-Islamicerrorism, nd acts of
generaldictatorial npleasantnessre all mixedup together,withtheimplicationhat
responsibilityoranyoneof them s responsibilityor all of them.This we mightcall
theprincipleof "the ndivisibility f evil."
20. Lakoff and Johnson point out that "metaphor nd metonymy aredifferentkinds of processes.
Metaphor s principallya way of conceiving of one thing in termsof another .. Metonymy, on the
otherhand,has primarilya referential unction,thatis, it allows us to use one entity to standfor an-
other."MetaphorsWeLive By, p. 36.
8/2/2019 Heradstveit Bonham (2007) - What the Axis of Evil Metaphor Did to Iran
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/heradstveit-bonham-2007-what-the-axis-of-evil-metaphor-did-to-iran 8/21
WHATTHEAXISOF EVILMETAPHORIDTOIRAN* 427
THECONTEXTUALACKGROUND21
Prior o theAxis of Evil speech,Iranian-Americanelationshad beenundergo-
ing a thaw.One factorwas PresidentKhatami's dea of a "dialogue f civilizations,"22presented s a response o SamuelHuntington's lashof civilizations heory.Another
was the apologyprofferedn March2000 by Secretaryof StateMadeleineAlbrightfor the events of 1953.She admitted hattheUnited Statesplayeda majorrole in the
overthrow f PrimeMinisterMuhammadMossadeqandtherebyputan end to Iranian
democratizationor the sakeof itsownoil interests.She alsoapologized orAmerica's
support f theShah'sbrutal epression nd or itsshort-sightednessnsupportingraq's
waragainst ran rom1980to 1988.Elite nterviews onductednboth200023 and2002
showedthatAlbright'sapologymadea strong mpression n theIranian ppositional
elite.A third actorwas the Iranian ollaborationwiththe WestoverAfghanistan.The
United Statesgraduallygrewdisenchantedwith theTaliban,which it hadoriginally
hoped mightstabilize hecountry.At the end of the 1990s MadeleineAlbright tated
that the UnitedStateswas now an opponentof the Talibanbecause of their"despi-
cable" treatment f women and theirgeneraldisrespect or humanrights. Similarly,
on September 5, 2001 ForeignSecretary ack StrawvisitedTehran, he firstofficialUK government isit since 1979,with a view to gettingIranto join the anti-Taliban
coalition.He stated hatIranwas a usefulandimportantonsulteewithregard o Af-
ghanistan.For theirpart,the Iraniansweresupportinghe NorthernAlliance, whoseethnicbackbonewas the Taziks24f thePanshirValleyand whichhadbeen under he
leadership f the legendaryguerrillaeaderAhmedShah Masouduntil his assassina-
tion on September , 2001 by al-Qa'idaagents.Following he attacksof 9/11, Iranand
the UnitedStates now had a common nterest n crushing heTaliban. ranenvisaged
a newgeopoliticalrolefor itself inAfghanistan ndCentralAsia, in alliancewith theUnitedStates. On November27, 2001 representativesf the NorthernAlliance andvariousAfghanexile groupsmet inBonnto construct transitionaldministration.he
NorthernAllianceacceptedaninternationaleace-keeping orce, andby December5thenegotiators adagreedon a government f nationalunityunderHamidKarzai. ran
playeda constructive ole at thisconference.Everything eemedto point towards ol-
laboration, eteverythingwouldchange ollowingthe Axis speech.
21. For a summaryof recentUS relationswithIranand a descriptionof the internalpoliticalsitua-
tion in Iran,see ErvandAbrahamian, EmpireStrikesBack:Iran n U.S. Sights," n BruceCummings,ErvandAbrahamian,and Moshe Ma'oz, eds., Inventing the Axis of Evil: The Truthabout NorthKorea,Iran,and Syria(New York: The New Press,2004). Abrahamian rgues(p. 94), among otherthings, thatthe Axis of Evil speechthreatens o reverse the process of reform n Iran.
22. See MuhammadKhatami,Hope and Challenge(Binghamton,NY:Instituteof GlobalCulturalStudiesBinghamtonUniversity,1997).
23. Daniel Heradstveit,"ElitePerceptionsof EthicalProblemsFacing theWesternOil IndustrynIran," ournalof IranianResearchandAnalysis, Vol. 17,No. 2 (2001), pp.22-40.
24. Taziksare theIranians' thniccousinsin CentralAsia, as they aresurrounded y mostlyTurkicpeoples.
8/2/2019 Heradstveit Bonham (2007) - What the Axis of Evil Metaphor Did to Iran
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/heradstveit-bonham-2007-what-the-axis-of-evil-metaphor-did-to-iran 9/21
428 * MIDDLEEASTJOURNAL
9/11 AND THEAXIS OF EVILIN IRANIANPOLITICS
THERESPONDENTS
Thedataforthisresearchwere collectedduring ieldworkn Iran n Marchand
April2002.Weconductedn-depthnterviewswith18members f the Iranian oliticalelitewhomaycurrently e consideredpartof thepoliticalopposition.25he"politicalopposition" s deemed to be those forces thatsupport eforms endingto strengthendemocratic rocessesand nstitutions, ndtherebyweakeningheautocratic oliticsof
thevelayat-efaqih.Thesurvey s basedon similar ield interviews onducted nApril2000 in which a totalof 14respondentsromtheIranian ppositionwere interviewed.
Theresponses hownbelowaredirectquotationsrom ndividualshatweretaken rom
detailed nterviewnotes.
SAMPLE NDMETHODOLOGY
We have made a purposive ampleof politicalelites who represent oliciesand
political deologiesthatare n competitionwiththe established nes,andthatmayone
day in the futurebe the mainstream.We also haveincludedrepresentativesf Iran's
culturaland artistic lite,a segmentof thepopulationhathasbeen animportantata-
lyst in the reformprocessthatthecountryhas beenundergoingorthelastdecade.Itshouldbeemphasizedhat his is notapopulationample nthestatistical ense. Social
science knows of no inter-subjectivendconsensualdefinitionof "elite,"andso nouniverses f "elitemembers"anpossiblybe identified. notherwords, t is impossibletotakea statistically epresentativeample,andforourresearch urposest is not evendesirable.
The interviewswere in-depth,andlastedon averagean hour anda half; a few
questionshadclosed responsecategories,while most were open.This methodologyinvolves ime-consumingwork o code theresponses,butthe openmethodwas a natu-
ralconsequenceof our notknowing heresponseuniverseverywell. In otherwords,we werepreparedobe surprised y what he elitesaid.Open-ended uestionsprovideinterestingnformation, nd oursurveyshave shown hat orpoliticalelitesthis proce-dure s stimulating theintervieweesgive moreof themselves han s thecase withclosedquestions.Theproblems risesubsequently, henwe trytoreviewandorganizethedata.Categorizing ndcoding of replies s a time-consuming rocess,butgivesthereader certainquantitativeictureof theresults naddition o theopportunityoenterthecognitiveworldof therespondentsia theextensiveanswers.
On theotherhand, he interviewnstrumentwas standardized,o thatall the re-
spondentswereaskedthesamequestions.Here it was a greathelpthatwe wereableto builduponthe knowledgeandexpertisewe had alreadyacquiredhrougha corre-sponding litesurveyundertakennApril2000.Theseeliteinterviews realso a partofa cumulative esearch trategynvolvingplansforfurtherraniannterview ounds. nthisperspective t is importanto elicit thecognitiveuniverseof therespondents, nd
25. For the respondents' ndividualbiographical nformation,please see the Appendixat the endof the article.
8/2/2019 Heradstveit Bonham (2007) - What the Axis of Evil Metaphor Did to Iran
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/heradstveit-bonham-2007-what-the-axis-of-evil-metaphor-did-to-iran 10/21
WHATTHEAXIS OFEVIL METAPHORDID TOIRAN * 429
for this reasonwe havechosen opresent eplieson mosttopicsalmostverbatim,whichis not usualin suchinvestigations.The objective s nexttime to operatewithclosedresponsecategorieson thebasisof the knowledgegarneredrom the 2000 and2002
surveys. tshouldbe noted hat his is notexclusivelya matter f snapshots f politicalattitudesas in opinionpolls, becauseourarbitraryampleof respondentsncludesadynamicperspective;hat s, it triesto lookforward.
We are alsofullyawareof the limitations f the data.Wehave imitedoursurveyto thepoliticalopposition n Iranand musttherefore ssume hatthe statementsmadein ourinterviewsreflecta politicalstrategy,hatis, the rhetoricof the opposition. tmustbe assumed hat heresponsesarepartof a politicalstrategyo discredit hesup-porters f AyatollahKhamene'i nd herevolutionaryoctrine f the IslamicRepublic.The fact thatwe wereforeignershelpedto softenthis aspect,becauseconversations
withforeigners mphasize he informativeperception-reflexive)ttheexpenseof theagitationand demagogy(instrumental)hatdominate he domesticpowerstruggle.However,what s said in oral nterviewsmayeasilyfail to match he facts.Oursurveymakesno attempto measurehe"truth uotient."Onthecontrary,ur aimis to chartnot factsbutperceptions.
THE RANIANELF-IMAGE
Before we turn to the respondents' views of the current state of play in Iranian
politicsand whichfactions haveprofitedandwhich suffered romthe Axis of Evilrhetoric,we shalllookbrieflyatwhattheysaid orimpliedaboutIran'smageof itselfin the newworldcreatedby theWorldTradeCenterattacks.
RESPONSES
Iran'sNationalUnityHas Been Strengthened
September11led to the Iranian overnmenteelingmoreresponsibilityor itspeo-ple. In generalpeople felt a certainsatisfaction n notingthatperipheral ationsin theThirdWorldcouldplaysuch an importantole in the USA. It is a paradoxthatsome of those whofelt satisfaction lsoreactedagainst heblindandpointlessviolence.
September11 has madethe rulersunderstandhattheymustdo moreto removethegapbetween herulersandtheruled.Thereformists renowopenlyadmittingthatthisgulf - whichis gettingwider exists.Thatpoliticians ake t seriouslyis shownby the greater reedomof speech:Therearecontroversiesnddisagree-
mentson therole thatshouldbeplayed n thisbythecourts,whichare nthehandsof the 'Leader.'
Prior o September11,foreignpolicywas a subcategory f domesticpolicy.Thiscreateda situation n whichnational ecuritypolicyacquired separate imension,partlyelevatedoverdomesticpolicy.Foreignpolicy was subjectto a tug of warbetweendifferent actions n whicheach conducted ts own foreignpolicy.AfterSeptember11, Iransawitselfobligedto change ts foreign-policy riorities.Con-servatives ndreformers ametogethermoreoftenthanbefore norder osearch or
8/2/2019 Heradstveit Bonham (2007) - What the Axis of Evil Metaphor Did to Iran
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/heradstveit-bonham-2007-what-the-axis-of-evil-metaphor-did-to-iran 11/21
430 * MIDDLE EASTJOURNAL
consensus n foreignpolicy.
Iranianoreignandsecuritypolicy is moreimportanthanever.Previously, achfaction conducted ts own foreignpolicy.Now thereis no doubtthat we need a
singlenational oreignpolicy.We must hink hings hrough arefullybeforewe actin theforeignpolicyarena.
Afterthe WTC, previousdisagreementswere laid aside. Before there were fac-
tions n the stateconductingheirownforeignpolicy.Forexample,Khatamiwasn'tawareof whatPasdarantheRevolutionary uard]wasdoing nAfghanistan.
Iran Has Become MoreIntegratedinto the WorldCommunity
The events made Iranians ealizethateverythinghathappens n this worldhascomecloser.Even whathappensa longwayawaycan haveconsequencesorIran.The notionthat we can isolate ourselvesfromthe rest of the world has become
weaker.
Ourgeopoliticalpositionmeant hateveryonehadto talkto us afterSeptember 1.Thismadeus feel important.
September 1reduced hetension inked o Iran n theinternationalommunity.
Theeventsaffectedeverycountryn theworld,and it is thereforenotadvisable oconsider ran eparately.t was a watershedhatmanypeoplethink hould orm hebasisof a new internationalystembasedon multilateralism.uropean ountriesareconcernedwith thisas well.
The need to strengthenhe globalcommunityanddemocratic alues has alwaysexisted.The WTChasstrengthenedheglobalcommunity.
Peoplearedependent n one another.This timeit wastheUSA thatwasaffected,
nexttime it canequallywell be us. Thedividebetweendifferent ultures s notsoclearanylonger;we canhavethe samefeelingsacrossculturalboundaries.
The catastropheof September11] was an excellentopportunityor IraniansoexpresssympathywiththeUSA anddemonstratehatthecountrydistancedtselffromthat sort of act. Iran oinedthe mainstreamf globalpolitics.Khatami ndmostotherIraniansxpressed ympathywiththeUSA, and n theworkof democ-ratizingAfghanistan,rancooperatedwiththeUSA. Khatami's pproach eflectedIranian ttitudes.
Iran is Perceived as Less Extreme
On September11 we were confrontedwith a modern orm of extremism.Thisweakened heimageof Iranas anextremist ountry.
Iranianxtremism s viewed n a gentler ightbecause heeventsso clearlyshowedthat heextremeelements n SunniIslamarewillingtogo further han heextremeelements n IranianShi'i Islam.Extremism n Shi'i Islam s moremodern han n
8/2/2019 Heradstveit Bonham (2007) - What the Axis of Evil Metaphor Did to Iran
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/heradstveit-bonham-2007-what-the-axis-of-evil-metaphor-did-to-iran 12/21
WHATTHE AXIS OF EVIL METAPHORDID TO IRAN * 431
SunniIslam.
AlthoughBin Ladinwas nohero, herewassympathyor himover he wholeworld.
Even in Europe hereweregroupswhowore Bin LadinT-shirts.Nothing ike this
happenedn Iran;heretherewas noone whoexpressed ympathyorhim.
It is importanthat Iranwas not involved.The ideologicalvocabularyn Iranhas
changed.Peopleno longercareabout ssues thatare of onlysymbolic mportance.Forexample he man n thestreethas no interest n fightingnLebanon.Howdoes
this serveour nterests?
It is importanthatnoteverybodyn Iranaccepted helogicbehind he acts.
It is importanthatKhatami ondemnedhe actsafteronly 11hours.
Iran Is the Lighthouseof Islam
We areunlikeothercountries n theregion.Ourpoliticalcultures in constantde-
velopment.And the veryfactthatwe have not stagnated asgivenus confidence.
Everyonewho comes fromoutsidemustpassthrough ran; hisgives us powerat
the sametimeas makingus vulnerableo attack.
Ingeneral,Arab ocietiesarestagnant. his is byno means hesituationnIran.Wehave a dynamic ocietywitha politicalphilosophynconstantdevelopment.
Of the threecountries hatBush first ncluded n the Axis of Evil, Iran s theonlyone where hepopulations well-educated.Moreover,ranplaysanimportant eo-
politicalrole.
The Iranian eformmovement,whichclaimsthata modempoliticalmovement an
grow upin anIslamiccountry,puts Iran n a specialposition.By focusingon elec-
tions andhumanrights, hereformists resendinga powerfulmessageto Muslim
countriesandFarsi-speaking opulations.
Most countries n the Muslimworld areheading owardsdemocracy. n this wayIran,comparedwith the restof theMuslimworld,has a lead of 20 years.
Discussion
Some respondentsthoughtthatthe United States had been weakened by 9/11, but
others believed that Iran had been strengthened by the attack. The strengthening they
describe takes the form of an increase in national unity and greatereffort to conduct acoherentforeign policy and a greaterintegration into the internationalcommunity. Our
respondents are sure that the fact that Iranwas quick to condemn the 9/11 terrorist at-
tacks, and indeed was the firstMuslim country to do so, was favorably received by the
rest of the world and would help to soften the West's perception of Iran as a terrorist
state. In the same way, the worldcommunityought to be able to see that the Iranian de-
ological extremism (as exemplified by Pasdaran'sassassination of dissidents in exile) is
in fact not so dangerous after all, in comparison with what happenedin Manhattan.
8/2/2019 Heradstveit Bonham (2007) - What the Axis of Evil Metaphor Did to Iran
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/heradstveit-bonham-2007-what-the-axis-of-evil-metaphor-did-to-iran 13/21
432 * MIDDLEEASTJOURNAL
It was also a commonperception mongour respondents hatas a consequence
of 9/11, Iranhas become more mportantn international olitics.After 9/11, a num-
berof delegations ameto Tehran. ran ooked as if it was about o be welcomed nto
the Western lub.Therespondentsmphasized he constructive olethey thought ran
played,and therewasa generalconsensus hat ts workto createa democraticAfghan
governmentwas of greatassistanceo the West.Behind his enthusiasmt was easy to
see a hopethat hiswouldbe thecountry's uture.
We may suspect hat he respondents ave an overlyoptimisticview of the inter-
national ommunity's bility o distinguish etween he "fundamentalism"f Iranand
thatof the Wahhabis f SaudiArabia.Forthe Iranians,hese are notonly two different
political deologies,buttheyaretwodramatically ifferentwaysof thinking. ran, hey
think,stands oranIslamicroad o modernity,with theability o adapt ochanging ir-
cumstances.Thereformmovement alksabout slamicdemocracy,he ruleof law,free-dom of speech,humanrights,and civil society. However,muchof the Westernworld
just tars he Shi'i Islamistswiththe brushof Wahhabi uritanismndobscurantism.
The key conceptin the mobilizingrhetoricwas "the GreatSatan" the United
States).Today t is mostlythe conservatives nd ultra-conservatives hoclingto this
enemy image,but t appearsromthe interviewsn both2000 and n 2002 thatIranian
elites, despitethe Revolution'sattempt o liberate he country romforeign interfer-
ence, still feel thattheyarein the powerof the United States.26 hehope is thatthe
UnitedStateswill conductsome self-examination nd confess its offensesagainst he
Iranian ation,so thatnew andgoodrelations an be established,n turn acilitatingmodern ran.
THE IMPACTOF THEAxis OF EvWLONIRANIAN OLITICS
Responses
What effect has the Axis of Evil rhetoric had on Iranian politics and
the Iranian factions? (n is the numberof statements)No effect on Iran 2
Strengthenedhe overseasexiles 1
Strengthenedhe reformers 2
Nationalunity 4
Killedoff dialoguewith theUSA 11
A godsend o the conservatives ndultra-conservatives 16
n = 36
26. Daniel Heradstveit,"Elite Perceptionsof Ethical ProblemsFacing theWesternOil Industry n
Iran," ournal of Iranian Researchand Analysis,Vol. 17,No. 2 (2001).
8/2/2019 Heradstveit Bonham (2007) - What the Axis of Evil Metaphor Did to Iran
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/heradstveit-bonham-2007-what-the-axis-of-evil-metaphor-did-to-iran 14/21
WHATTHE AXIS OF EVIL METAPHORDID TO IRAN * 433
No Effect in Iran;Strengthened he OverseasExiles
No Iranian rouphasexploited histo its ownadvantage.
No singlefaction n Iranhas benefited romthespeech.On theotherhand, heIra-
nianpoliticaloppositionabroadthePahlavists) avebenefited.Thespeechcreated
anatmospherehatenabled he exile oppositionopresenttself as analternativeo
the Islamicgovernment.
Strengthenedthe Reformers
The reformers ave benefitedromthephrase.Theconservatives avebeen scared
and now see theUSA as a real threat.Forthisreason heyaremorecautiousabout
usingtheUSA in the ideologicalstruggleagainst he reformers.Theyunderstandthat his is not the time forideological nitiatives n domesticpolicy;Iranmustact
rationally.All rationaloreignpolicyfavors hereformers. heideologicalelement
inpoliticsharms hecountryandmustbe eliminated.
As long as theywereconfident hat no foreignstate wouldoverthrow hegovern-
ment,the rulersof Iran elt strongenough o oppress heoppositionn thecountry.But afterBush'sspeechon theAxis of Evil,andbearingn mind heactivityof thesecularoppositionabroad includingShahPahlavi's on- thegovernmenton-cluded hat heUSA wouldsupporthe secularandWestern-oriented
ppositionn
Iran. norder o deal with sucha situation ndtheproblems his wouldbring, heywent in fornational econciliation.
NationalUnity
Thereformers re concernednotto give theUSA the impressionhatIrancanbefrightenedntocompliance.Thethreathasbroughtheconservatives ndreformers
together, ompelled o solidarity gainstwhat s seenas anexternaldanger.
The interestinghing is thatwe in Iran acrossfactionalboundaries havereacheda consensuson how to react to it. We shallnot subjectourselves o theUSA,butneither rewe interestedngivingthe USAexcusesforfurtheronfronta-tion. Weareusingthe meanswe have at ourdisposalas regards educing heef-fect thephrasecan haveinternationally,nter alia by cultivatingontactswiththeEuropeans.
Theconservatives avebeensurprisinglyautious.We think t is because heyarequitesimplyscared hat heUSAwill carryout itsthreats. notherwords, his is too
serious oexploitforpropagandaurposes.
If we arethreatenedromoutside,we will stand ogether egardless f ourviewsindomesticpolitics.
Killedoff the Dialogue with the USA
Thelastyearhas beendisappointingor Iran.TheUSAhasdictateddevelopments.
8/2/2019 Heradstveit Bonham (2007) - What the Axis of Evil Metaphor Did to Iran
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/heradstveit-bonham-2007-what-the-axis-of-evil-metaphor-did-to-iran 15/21
434* MIDDLEEASTJOURNAL
Khatami's onceptof 'the dialogueof civilizations'has been shelved n favourof
the USA'sunilateral olicy.
The groups hatsupported ialoguewiththe USA thereforeost ground.
The speechchanged he basis for oint actionwiththe USA. In the new context, he
ideaof dialogueacquired differentmeaning rombefore,whichunderminedhe
positionof those whosupported ialoguewith theUSA.
ThephraseBushusedhas meant hat hemoderatesmust o a muchgreaterdegree
thanpreviouslydefendall positive steps they supportn the relationshipwiththe
USA and n internationalolicy.
In such a situation,he reformerswill not advocatedialoguewith theUSA either.In the lightof the collaborationwith the USA, the reformers ave takenover the
conservatives'rgumentshat he USA cannotbe trusted.
It has weakenedhepositionof thosewhosupport detentewith the USA.
TheIranian oliticianswho wantdialoguewith the USA see theirchanceas gone.
Theideais now dead.
Thephrasecamestraight fter he collaboration etween he USA and Iran n Af-
ghanistan.The sense of betrayalwasstrong.
Iranianswhowerepreviouslyneutral o theUSAhaveunfortunatelyhanged heir
viewsandare nowagainst he USA.
Withgreat satisfaction, heynote that the Axis of Evil is a slapin the face of all
those who trustedhe USA.
I think hat he Axis of Evil hasdestroyedhe foundationora normalized elation-
shipbetweenIranandthe USA.
A Godsendto the Conservativesand Ultra-conservatives
Butwe shouldrememberhat heconservatives, y maintainingheenmitywiththe
USA, arenotexclusivelyconcernedwithscoringdomesticpoints.Thefact is that
theytoowantto negotiate.Theproblem s, however,hat n Iran, actional ighting
is still moreimportanthannational nterests.By exploitingBush's statementsn
domesticpolitics,the conservatives levated actionalconflictovernational nter-
ests.
Religious groups,thosewho exercisereligiousandpoliticalpower,have had the
greatestbenefit rom hespeech.Thespeechwasperceived saninsult o thevalues
of the Iranian eopleandfor thatreason aused heIraniansorallyaroundhe reli-
giousvalues.This reaction trengthenedheconservative roups.The mobilization
of religiousandconservativedeas wasstrengthened y the fact thatBush'sspeech
8/2/2019 Heradstveit Bonham (2007) - What the Axis of Evil Metaphor Did to Iran
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/heradstveit-bonham-2007-what-the-axis-of-evil-metaphor-did-to-iran 16/21
WHATTHEAXIS OF EVILMETAPHORDID TOIRAN * 435
camerightbeforeourcelebrationf the23'd nniversaryf the IslamicRevoluion.27Thismade t easier o getmassesof peopleonto thestreetsanddemonstrategainstwhatBush said andthisbenefitedhe conservativeorces n society.
Therightwing profitedrom heAxis of Evil.Thelanguageused ntheconservativenewspaperKayhans nowthe sameasduring hewarwithIraq,violentandblood-thirsty.Realityis presentedn a way thatrequires he country o be in continualpreparedness,he citizens mustbe on guardand form a common rontagainst he
enemyat thegates.Theconservatives reusingtheAmericannitiativeoeliminateoroppress heopposition.
When heUSA,on the basisof itspositionof power, nsultsanation, ecurityques-tionsacquire place nnational oliticsat theexpenseof topicssuchasfreedomor
the citizens.Thegroups hat upportedpenness ndomesticpolicy .. thereforeostground.The ultra-conservativeaction s criticalof the government nd the statebenefited romBush'sspeech.
PresidentClintonandSecretaryof StateMadeleineAlbrightwere of a differentmetal thanBush.The wayBush is going, he is pouringoil on the flamesof anti-Americanism.He is givingthefundamentalistshelpinghand.Mr.Bushhas exhib-ited a lack of interestnprotectingivil society,civilrights,and hedevelopmentfpoliticalpartiesn Iran.On thebasis of Bush'sstatements,heconservativeswantto introduce stateof emergencyn Iran.
The fact thatBushmade a distinctionn his speech betweenthe electedand thenon-electedelementsof the government ould havebeen used by the reformers.Theycouldhaveplayedon this distinctionandso strengthenedheirposition nIranian olitics.Instead, heycollaboratedwiththeforcesof thedictatorship. heright-wingersmmediatelyawthedanger hat hesupportersf religiousdictator-shipin Iranandthe Talibanmightbe portrayed s birdsof a feather,andthusthattheymightsuffer hesamefate as theTaliban.Topreventhis,theyrealized hat nthis situation hey neededsupport romKhatami, nd it turnedout thatKhatami
waseasytoplayfor a sucker.Thereformers'trategic lunderwasdueto anuncon-sciousxenophobia. t was thisthatpreventedhemfromreaping hebenefitsof asituationhatcould havestrengthenedheforcesof democracyn Iran.
Intheconservative amp herearethosewhohavebenefitedrom hephrase.
The phrasegoes in the conservatives'avor.If the verbalhostilitiesbetweentheUSA andIrancontinue, hey will strengthen he conservative orcesat the nextelection.
The conservatives ndthe ultra-conservatives,ho - in contradistinctiono thereformerswhowantdialogue basetheirpolicyonhostilerelationswiththeUSAandwill clearlybenefit romBush'sspeech.AfterAfghanistan, ranexpected hatthe dialoguewiththe USA wouldget windin its sails,butthencamethe speechthatgave the right-wingershe chanceto say, 'If theywantto hurtus, thenwe'llhurt hem.'
27.January9 andFebruary 1,2002,respectively.
8/2/2019 Heradstveit Bonham (2007) - What the Axis of Evil Metaphor Did to Iran
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/heradstveit-bonham-2007-what-the-axis-of-evil-metaphor-did-to-iran 17/21
436* MIDDLEEASTJOURNAL
Theextremeightwing orceshavederiveddvantagerom heAxisofEvil.
Theconservatives'ssiduously-usedrgumenthat heUSA s hostile o Iranhasbeen trengthened.
Thespeechhasstrengthenedherightwing orces n Iran.Theeffectof thestate-mentwasextensive ecauset wounded ationaleelings hateveryonehares.Bushassaultedpeople,heir ulture,nd heireelings.
Theconservativeselcomedhespeechwithopenarms.
Iranianonservativesave lutchedhephraseo their reasts. ushhasgivenhemthe dealammunition.
ForIran, ll interferenceyforeign owerss theworsthing maginable.WhenBushused heterm heAxisofEvil, twasas if hehitthemoderateorces n Iranwitha hammer.
Discussion
The WTCattacksandsubsequentAmericanpolicyhave had a decisive effect on
Iraniandomesticpolitics.Iranianhatred s not reserved or "theGreatSatan."There
are fierceconflictsamongIraniansas well. Society is fragmented,with destructivefactional ightingbetweensupportersf therevolutionary homeinidogmasandthose
who wanta modemIranwith the ruleof law andfreedomof expression.
Onlytwo of the respondents ismissed he Axis of Evil rhetoricas havingfew
consequences or Iranianpolitics.Oneclaimedthat no Iranianactionhadexploitedthespeech nitsowninterest,aseveryone alliedround heflag,whileanother aid thattheonlybeneficiarywastheexiledopposition, hePahlavists, ivingthemhopeforim-minentregimechange.Everyone lse considered hat hephrasehadhad anenormousimpacton thetugof warbetween heconservatives ndreformers.
Somerespondents int thattherearegroups n Iranian ocietywhichhopefor abitof outsidehelpingettingridof thedictatorship. t thesametime,abloodbaths thelastthingthatthey want.Inthisperspective hepolicy of theUnitedStatesunderBillClinton,whichnowappearsohavebeenshelved,waspromising. t wasimplicit n this
policythatIrancould, by smallstepsandavoidingwar,createthe ruleof law and anIslamicversionof democracy.Fora country ike Iran,American abre-rattlingnderBushis particularlylarming, s thefragmentationf theIranian ationwill mean hatthealready rreconcilable actionswill hateone anotherall the moreandexploit theresulting haos to makea grab orpower. talsowill harmeconomicdevelopment ndcompromise ran'sabilityto deterother attacks.The anxiety the liberalrespondentsfeel leads several o contemplate xile.
TheAxis of Evilledto realfear,notonlyamong hereformers utalsoamong heconservatives.Tworespondentsonsideredhat hespeechhadstrengthenedeformistforcesbybadlyscaring heconservatives. ccording o thesetworespondents,onser-vativeswereconvinced hattheUnitedStateswouldsooneror laterattack ran.Theyrealized hatwith thethreatof anAmericanmilitaryattackhangingoverIran,perhapswith a view to a Pahlavirestoration,his was no time forideologicaladventures rthe
8/2/2019 Heradstveit Bonham (2007) - What the Axis of Evil Metaphor Did to Iran
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/heradstveit-bonham-2007-what-the-axis-of-evil-metaphor-did-to-iran 18/21
WHATTHEAXISOFEVILMETAPHORIDTOIRAN* 437
politicsof symbolism.Thus,conservatives, ccordingo thesetworespondents,oneddownthe anti-American hetoric rom the Revolutionand,afraidthat the reformerswouldgettheupperhand,bit the bulletandoffered hemameasure f compromise nd
cooperation.However, his "Tehran pring"wasverybrief:As soonas theconserva-tivesfelt they heard hedanger-overiren,theyexploitedBush'sspeechforall it wasworth.
Our nterviews hussuggestthattheAmericanwarningo Iranembeddedn theAxis of Evilspeechgaveconservativesauseandresulted ngreaternationalunity.An-otherconsequence f thespeechwas thealienation f reformers.Theymet theconser-
vativeshalf-way,witha suddenlydecreased nthusiasm ornormalizationf relations
witha country hathadbetrayed,hreatened,nd nsulted hem n thismanner.
According o therespondents,he Bushspeechupsetthepositivetrend hathad
begun n Iranian olitics,suchas a moreopenattitude o theinternationalommunityand a normalization f relationswith the UnitedStates.There was muchtalkof the"objective"lliancebetween he twocountriesn overthrowingheTaliban ndrecon-structing heAfghangovernment.This,theythink,demonstratedheusefulness o thesuperpower f havinggoodrelationswith Iran.With helaunching f the Axis of Evil,however,all this was put on ice, andwill not be takenout againfor a long time. To
stigmatizea countryn thatwaywasseenas a deeplyhostileact.
Strongandpassionate s therespondents'enseof betrayalwas,thesuddendeathof the dialoguewith the UnitedStateswas neverthelessnot the highest-scoring f-fect of theAxis of Evil. Thatwas reserved or the balefuleffect on Iran'sdomesticfactional ighting.There s a massiveconsensus hatthespeechwas a godsend o theconservatives, evitalizing he bloodthirsty nti-Americanhetoric romthe days oftheRevolution.The conservativesook thespeechas the finalproof thattheirenemyimageof theUnitedStateshadbeenrightall along,andthatthereformers,withtheirwishfordialogue,were naive.And it is veryhard orthereformerso arguewiththis,as mostpeoplewill perceive heAxis of Evil to be insultinganddegrading.Someoftherespondents tated t wastheviolence-pronendcoup-plotting ltra-conservatives
whoprofitedmostof all fromBush'schoiceof words.
CONCLUSION
In this articlewe focused on domesticIranianpolitics andthe impactthereof9/l 1 andtheAxisof Evil.Therespondentswerequiteupbeatnregardsothefirst, ee-ing it as strengtheningraniannationalunityandbringingcoherence o thecountry'sforeignpolicy.Further,he WTCattacksandIran'sprompt ondemnationmeant hatthe Iranian"fundamentalists"ereno longerseenas theworstthatIslamhad to offer.
Regarding heimpacton theIranianactorsof theAxis speechspecifically,heresultswerequiteunambiguous. tinyminority awit ashelping hereformers rthePahlav-istexiles, a largerminority mphasizedheway it scaredoroffended heconservativesandreformersntocollaboratingwiththeothercamp,buttherewas anoverwhelmingconsensus hat t hadbothkilled thenascentdialoguewiththeUnitedStatesandcomeas a godsend o theconservatives ndtheultra-conservatives.
Themetaphorargetsentirecountries,nottheir eaders.Itdoes notdifferentiatebetween heevil leadersandthe otherswholive in thecountry.Thereformers,or ex-
8/2/2019 Heradstveit Bonham (2007) - What the Axis of Evil Metaphor Did to Iran
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/heradstveit-bonham-2007-what-the-axis-of-evil-metaphor-did-to-iran 19/21
438 * MIDDLEEASTJOURNAL
ample,did not want o be viewed asevil,butthemetaphor ainted hemwith the same
brushof evil; they resistedbyjoiningwith the conservatives ndrallyingaround he
government. n otherwords,themetaphormobilized he entirecountry including
"friends" f the US. We also would remarkhat,whileGreatPowersknow that theirown citizensforgettheirdifferencesandrallyto the flagwhenattacked, hey always
seem to havedifficultyunderstanding hy this might also be the case for theiren-
emies.
Inconclusion,we wouldpointout that he crafters f a rhetorical evice ntended
to function n one culturalandpoliticalcontexthaveonly imperfect ontrolover how
that deviceis receivedandexploited n an alienculturalandpoliticalcontext.Thisis
exactlywhatwe havewitnessedwith dramatichanges n thepoliticalcontextafter he
metaphorwas originallyarticulated. ince then therehasbeenonedramaticnterven-
ing event,theWar n Iraq.Theimpactof this event is too well known,discussed,andanalyzed o dwell furtheruponit here.Sufficeto say thattheWar n Iraqhasbeena
realitycheck on what a superpoweran and cannotachieve n theregion.The War n
Iraqhasbeen a learning xperienceor a wholeglobalaudiencehaving ochangemany
of its pre-warperceptions f a superpower eing graduallyweakenedn its self-image
as well as weakenedn theeyes of the world.
Withthisdramaticallyhanging ituation,PresidentBush hasstoppedusingthe
metaphor.With the changingcontext,the metaphorhas beenemptiedof its original
meaning;ts original ourcehaslost its rhetorical orce.Butthechangingcontexthas
given the metaphornew meaning o thosepeopleand countries t was originally n-
tended o discredit.Now it goes to demonstrate owthe"evilUS"couldlabela whole
country ike Iranas evil. It is notat all surprisinghat the rightwing of the Revolu-
tionaryGuardaffiliatedwith MahmudAhmadinejadikes to repeat his metaphor s
anexampleof what satanic orcesthe US represents.Thisalso is anexampleof how
a senderof any given messagecan lose controlover its furtheruse. New senderscan
resend t in a form that s quitecontraryo whattheoriginalsender ntended. t is not
evennecessaryor thenewsenders otryto createnewmeanings,because hechanging
politicalcontexthasalreadygivenit newmeaning.Ourrespondentsmadesomeappropriateredictions bout heshort-term ffects
of themetaphornIran.What heydid notforesee,however,was its long-term ffect.It
is still with us in politicalspeecheseverywhere. t has been seizedas a rhetorical ool
by many nourglobalvillage.Theeffect of themetaphoror the domesticdevelopment
in Iranhas,for all those working or democracy ndthe ruleof lawinsidethe country,
been a disaster einforced y the turnof events.
GeorgeW.Bush,if not rememberedoranything lse, will certainlybe remem-
bered orgivingtheworld he skillfulbutmisguided onstruction f the metaphor,he
Axis of Evil. It has become a powerful hetorical ool for mobilizing he ultra-conser-vativeand anti-democraticorcesin Iran.The metaphor lso hasbecome a stumbling
block forBush,as well as for the effortof theUnitedStates o createa betterworld.
8/2/2019 Heradstveit Bonham (2007) - What the Axis of Evil Metaphor Did to Iran
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/heradstveit-bonham-2007-what-the-axis-of-evil-metaphor-did-to-iran 20/21
WHATTHEAXISOFEVILMETAPHORIDTOIRAN* 439
APPENDIX
LIST OF RESPONDENTS
1. BahmanFarmanara:. 1942.Studiedactingin Englandat the age of 16 andthen
studied ilmmakingn theUS at theUniversity f SouthernCalifornia.Hereturnedo
Iran o work n IranianTV.ReturnedotheUS andCanada etween1980-1990,where
heranseveral ilmcompanies.Hehas made ivefeature ilms,themostrecentof which
areSmellof Camphor;centofJasmineandHouse BuiltonWater.
2. SadeghZibaKalam:b. 1948.Studied ngineeringn LondonandreceivedhisPh.D.
atBradford,UK,onthe IranianRevolution.Heis aprofessor f PoliticalScience ntheFacultyof Lawand PoliticalScienceat TehranUniversity.
3. FarhadAtaie:b. 1953.Ph.D. nNearEasternStudies romtheUniversity f Califor-
nia,Berkeley.Professorof Economicsat ImamSadeghUniversity.
4. Anonymousplaywright.
5. AbadollahMolaei:Directorof Euro-Americantudiesat the Institute or Political
andInternationaltudies,Tehran.
6. SeyedKazemSajjadpour: h.D. from the US. DirectorGeneralof theInstituteorPoliticalandInternationaltudies,Tehran.
7. MahmudSarioghlam: ducatedn theUnitedStates,he is aprofessor ntheFacultyof EconomicsandPoliticalScience,ShahidBeheshtiUniversitynIranandthe headoftheCenter or ScientificResearch ndStrategicStudiesof theMiddleEast.
8. HamidReza Jalaiepour:One of the most activereformistournalists,he was in-volvedwithmost of thenow-closednewspapers,ncluding ame'ehandmostrecently
Bonyan.
9. FarshidFarzin:b. 1967. He is an M.A.candidaten theFacultyof LawandPoliticalScienceof TehranUniversity,workingon his thesison International awandSatelliteLegislation.He is also a consultanto AtiehBaharconsultancyirm.
10.AmirMohebian:He is a columnist or theconservative ewspaperResalatand is
consideredo be themostvocalspokespersonortheconservativeide.
11.Mohammad li Najafi:b. 1945.He hasan M.A.inarchitecture. e alsohasdirect-ed several ilmsandtelevision eries.Hisarchitecturalirm s responsibleordesigninga mosqueand a cultural enter n Tehran.
12. SiamakNamazi:b. 1971. He receivedhis M.A. in UrbanPlanning romRutgersUniversityandhas lived in Iransince 1999. He is the RiskandStrategicManagement
8/2/2019 Heradstveit Bonham (2007) - What the Axis of Evil Metaphor Did to Iran
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/heradstveit-bonham-2007-what-the-axis-of-evil-metaphor-did-to-iran 21/21
440 * MIDDLEEASTJOURNAL
Directorat Atieh BaharConsulting n Tehran.
13. Hadi Semati:b. 1960. He receivedhis Ph.D. in PoliticalScience from the Univer-
sityof Tennesseen Knoxville.Spent1978-1980inthe UnitedStates, henreturnedoIran,wherehe did his military erviceandworked or theForeignMinistry.He spent
1985-1993 in theUS andcurrentlyeachesat theUniversity f Tehran, acultyof Law
and PoliticalScience.
14. HatamGhaderi:Professorof Political Philosophyat Tehran'sTeacherTraining
University.
15. AhmadZeydabadi: . 1965.Ph.D.candidatenTehranUniversity'sFacultyof Law
andPoliticalScience.His dissertations onreligionandthe state nIsrael.Heworksasajournalistn theForeignDesk of Hamshahri nd variousothernewspapers.He was
in prison or seven months n 2001 and was recentlysentenced o 23 monthsplus five
yearsprohibitionrom ournalistic ctivity.
16. FarhadFirouzi:Previous ditorof theweekly ournalKarnami. ndependent riter
andauthor.
17. IbrahimAsgharzadeh: . 1955. Studiedelectricalengineeringat Sharif Univer-
sity and became partof the studentmovementbeforethe Revolution.He was one
of the main US hostage-takers nd was an MP in the thirdparliament.He is cur-
rentlyan elected memberof the TehranCity Council and an outspokenreformer.
18. SeyyedIbrahimNabavi:b. 1958.He is Iran'smostpopular atiristwhosenewspaper
columnsappear egularlyn the mainstream nd reformistpress.He was imprisoned
for his writingsandcurrentlyunshispopularwebsite,http://www.nabavionline.com.