Henry Fund Report - SLB - Tippie College of...

24
The Henry Fund Henry B. Tippie School of Management Amit Shah [[email protected]] Schlumberger Ltd. (SLB) September 21, 2015 Energy – Oil & Gas Field Services Stock Rating Buy Investment Thesis Target Price $115120 “The best thing that happens to us is when a great company gets into temporary trouble…We want to buy them when they’re on the operating table.This quote by Warren Buffet summarizes our investment hypothesis for Slchlumberger Ltd (SLB). SLB is the largest and arguably the most efficiently managed company in the Oil & Gas Field Services (OFS) industry. We believe that with crude oil prices (WTI) at $46/barrel, a further significant price correction seems unlikely. However, a significant time correction is a distinct possibility. SLB is well positioned to survive through this time correction due to its strong track record, diversified service portfolio and presence across the major geographies in the world. We recommend BUY on SLB with a target price of $117, an upside of 56%. Drivers of Thesis SLB has a strong business portfolio with array of services offered by it to E&P companies. This along with its long track record makes it a partner of choice for E&P companies across the world. SLB’s dependence on US oil and gas production sector is much lower than some of the other companies in the sector, which makes it less vulnerable to a downturn in the US E&P activities. The current downturn in the industry offers great opportunity for SLB to strengthen its position by acquiring other smaller but quality companies like Cameron. Such acquisitions will strengthen SLBs dominance in the industry. SLBs strong financial performance amid downturn in the industry speaks volume about the management’s ability to protect the interest of shareholders. Risks to Thesis A significant reduction in the oil prices from current level would have adverse impact on SLB’s business DCF $117.01 DDM $87.43 Relative Multiple $105.00 Price Data Current Price $75.00 52wk Range $68.01 – 105.82 Key Statistics Market Cap (B) $95.32 Shares Outstanding (B) 1.27 Institutional Ownership 80.0% Five Year Beta 1.13 Dividend Yield 2.5% Est. 5yr Growth 10.5% Price/Earnings (TTM) 22.40 Price/Earnings (FY1) 19.30 Price/Sales (TTM) 2.40 Price/Book 2.50 Profitability Operating Margin 16.9% Profit Margin 14.8% Return on Capital (TTM) 21.8% Return on Equity (TTM) 19.0% Source: Yahoo finance; www.spdrs.com Earnings Estimates Year 2012 2013 2014 2015E 2016E 2017E EPS $4.25 $4.77 $5.57 $3.53 $3.86 $4.10 Growth 9.8% 12.3% 16.7% 36.6% 9.3% 6.1% 12 Month Performance Company Description Source: Yahoo Finance SLB is world’s largest Oil Field Services (OFS) company with presence across 85 countries and business value chain. It supplies technology, integrated project management, and information solutions to the oil and gas exploration and production industries worldwide. The company operates through Reservoir Characterization Group, Drilling Group, and Production Group segments. The recent acquisition of Cameron International has strengthened its presence in products and offshore drilling segments. SLB is one of the most profitable companies in the sector. 22.4 19.0 2.5 13.7 11.8 2.1 15.4 7.3 3.3 0 5 10 15 20 25 P/E ROE Div Yield SLB Industry Sector 70% 50% 30% 10% 10% 30% S O N D J F M A M J J A SLB S&P 500

Transcript of Henry Fund Report - SLB - Tippie College of...

Page 1: Henry Fund Report - SLB - Tippie College of Businesstippie.biz.uiowa.edu/henry/reports15/SLB_fa15.pdf · SLBis&well& positioned& to& survive ... • SLB&has&astrong&business&portfolio&with&array&of

Important  disclosures  appear  on  the  last  page  of  this  report.  

The  Henry  Fund  

 Henry  B.  Tippie  School  of  Management  Amit  Shah  [amitashok-­‐[email protected]]        Schlumberger  Ltd.  (SLB)   September  21,  2015  

Energy  –  Oil  &  Gas  Field  Services   Stock  Rating   Buy  

Investment  Thesis   Target  Price   $115-­‐120    “The   best   thing   that   happens   to   us   is   when   a   great   company   gets   into  temporary   trouble…We  want   to   buy   them  when   they’re   on   the   operating  table.“  This  quote  by  Warren  Buffet  summarizes  our   investment  hypothesis  for   Slchlumberger   Ltd   (SLB).   SLB   is   the   largest   and   arguably   the   most  efficiently  managed  company   in   the  Oil  &  Gas  Field  Services   (OFS)   industry.  We  believe  that  with  crude  oil  prices  (WTI)  at  $46/barrel,  a  further  significant  price   correction   seems   unlikely.   However,   a   significant   time   correction   is   a  distinct   possibility.   SLB   is   well   positioned   to   survive   through   this   time  correction   due   to   its   strong   track   record,   diversified   service   portfolio   and  presence  across  the  major  geographies  in  the  world.  We  recommend  BUY  on  SLB  with  a  target  price  of  $117,  an  upside  of  56%.      Drivers  of  Thesis  • SLB  has  a  strong  business  portfolio  with  array  of  services  offered  by  it  to  

E&P  companies.  This  along  with  its  long  track  record  makes  it  a  partner  of  choice  for  E&P  companies  across  the  world.  

• SLB’s  dependence  on  US  oil  and  gas  production  sector  is  much  lower  than  some  of  the  other  companies  in  the  sector,  which  makes  it  less  vulnerable  to  a  downturn  in  the  US  E&P  activities.  

• The  current  downturn  in  the  industry  offers  great  opportunity  for  SLB  to  strengthen   its  position  by  acquiring  other   smaller  but  quality  companies  like   Cameron.   Such   acquisitions   will   strengthen   SLBs   dominance   in   the  industry.  

• SLBs  strong  financial  performance  amid  downturn   in  the   industry  speaks  volume   about   the   management’s   ability   to   protect   the   interest   of  shareholders.    

 Risks  to  Thesis  • A   significant   reduction   in   the   oil   prices   from   current   level   would   have  

adverse  impact  on  SLB’s  business    

DCF   $117.01  DDM   $87.43  Relative  Multiple   $105.00  Price  Data    Current  Price   $75.00  52wk  Range   $68.01  –  105.82  Key  Statistics    Market  Cap  (B)   $95.32  Shares  Outstanding  (B)   1.27  Institutional  Ownership   80.0%  Five  Year  Beta   1.13  Dividend  Yield   2.5%  Est.  5yr  Growth   10.5%  Price/Earnings  (TTM)   22.40  Price/Earnings  (FY1)   19.30  Price/Sales  (TTM)   2.40  Price/Book     2.50  Profitability    Operating  Margin   16.9%  Profit  Margin   14.8%  Return  on  Capital  (TTM)   21.8%  Return  on  Equity  (TTM)   19.0%  

 Source:  Yahoo  finance;  www.spdrs.com  

Earnings  Estimates  Year   2012   2013   2014   2015E   2016E   2017E  EPS   $4.25   $4.77   $5.57   $3.53   $3.86   $4.10  

Growth   9.8%   12.3%   16.7%   -­‐36.6%   9.3%   6.1%  12  Month  Performance   Company  Description  

 Source:  Yahoo  Finance  

SLB   is   world’s   largest   Oil   Field   Services   (OFS)  company  with  presence  across  85  countries  and  business   value   chain.   It   supplies   technology,  integrated  project  management,  and  information  solutions   to   the   oil   and   gas   exploration   and  production   industries   worldwide.   The   company  operates   through   Reservoir   Characterization  Group,   Drilling   Group,   and   Production   Group  segments.     The   recent   acquisition   of   Cameron  International   has   strengthened   its   presence   in  products   and   offshore   drilling   segments.     SLB   is  one   of   the   most   profitable   companies   in   the  sector.  

22.4  19.0  

2.5  

13.7  11.8  

2.1  

15.4  

7.3  3.3  

0  

5  

10  

15  

20  

25  

P/E   ROE   Div  Yield  

SLB   Industry   Sector  

-­‐70%  

-­‐50%  

-­‐30%  

-­‐10%  

10%  

30%  

S   O   N   D   J   F   M   A   M   J   J   A  

SLB   S&P  500  

Page 2: Henry Fund Report - SLB - Tippie College of Businesstippie.biz.uiowa.edu/henry/reports15/SLB_fa15.pdf · SLBis&well& positioned& to& survive ... • SLB&has&astrong&business&portfolio&with&array&of

     

    Page  2        

EXECUTIVE  SUMMARY  

SLB   is   the   unequivocal   leader   in   the   OFS   industry   with  highest   market   share   across   most   of   its   operating  segments  and  in  terms  of  earnings,  which  are  more  than  double   its   closest   competitor.   As   the   technological   and  profit   leader   in   the   OFS   industry,   SLB’s   success   can   be  attributed   to   its   focus   on   technology   innovation,  extensive   geographic   presence   and   wide   range   of  products  and  services.    We  believe  SLB’s  strong  financial  position  will  continue  to  offer  the  company  opportunities  for   organic/inorganic   growth,   through   acquisitions   and  continued  high  R&D  spending.    

We  believe  that  with  crude  oil  prices  (WTI)  at  $46/barrel,  further   significant   price   correction   seems   unlikely.  However,   a   significant   time   correction   is   a   distinct  possibility.   SLB   is  well   positioned   to   survive   through   this  time  correction  due  to  its  strong  track  record,  diversified  service   portfolio   and   presence   across   the   major  geographies   in   the   world.   We   recommend   BUY   on   SLB  with  target  price  of  $117,  an  upside  of  56%.  

COMPANY  DESCRIPTION  

SLB  is  world’s  largest  OFS  Company  with  presence  across  85   countries   and   business   value   chain.   It   supplies  technology,   integrated   project   management,   and  information   solutions   to   the  oil   and   gas   exploration   and  production   industries  worldwide.  The  company  operates  through  Reservoir  Characterization  Group,  Drilling  Group,  and  Production  Group  segments.    The   recent  acquisition  of   Cameron   International   has   strengthened   its   presence  in  products  and  offshore  drilling  segments.  The  company  was  founded  in  France  in  1926,  with  invention  of  wireline  logging   by   the   Schlumberger   brothers.   Over   the   period,  SLB  began  performing  logging  and  other  well  services  in  a  number  of  different  countries.    

SLB:  Revenue  by  Business  Segments  

Source:  Company  filings  -­‐  10Q  

The  Reservoir  Characterization  Group    

This  segment  provides  reservoir  imaging,  monitoring,  and  development   services;   wireline   technology   that   offers  open-­‐hole   and   cased-­‐hole   services;   exploration   and  production   pressure   and   flow-­‐rate   measurement  services;   information   solutions,   such   as   software,  consulting,   information   management,   and   IT  infrastructure   services   that   support   oil   and   gas   industry  operational   processes;   interpretation   and   integration   of  exploration   and   production   data   types,   as   well   as  consulting   services   for   reservoir   characterization,   field  development   planning   production   enhancement,   and  multi-­‐disciplinary  reservoir  and  production  solutions;  and  multi   client   data   library   and   industry   petro-­‐technical  training  solutions.  

We   expect   Reservoir   Characterization   Group   to   report  22.5%   decline   in   revenue   in   2015   due   to   decrease   in  exploration  related  capex  in  Europe/CIS/Africa,  US  Gulf  of  Mexico   and   Australia.   It   would   impact   the   demand   for  wireline  and  testing  services  activities.    

SLB:  Reservoir  Characterization  Group  Revenue

Source:  Company  filings  -­‐  10K,  HF  estimates  

The  Drilling  Group  

This   segment   designs,  manufactures,   and  markets   roller  cone  and  fixed  cutter  drill  bits,  as  well  as  provides  drilling  fluid   systems,   and   environmental   services   and   products;  offers   geo   services,   drilling   and   measurement   services,  and   land   drilling   and   related   support   services;   and  provides   bottom   hole   assembly   drilling   tools,   borehole  enlargement  technologies,   impact  tools,  and  tubular  and  tubular  services.    

Revenue  from  Drilling  Group  is  expected  to  fall  by  23%  in  CY15   due   to   significant   drop   in   rigs   count   in   North  America,   which   impacted   the   drilling   activities.   Lower  drilling   activity   in   Sub-­‐   Saharan   Africa,   Australia   and  Colombia  are  also  expected  to  impact  the  sales  

Drilling'39%'

Reservoir'Produc4on'

35%'

Reservoir'Characteriza4o

n'26%'

9.9# 11.2# 12.5# 12.2# 9.5# 10.0# 10.8#

6.5%#

12.4%# 11.7%#

-1.9%#

-22.5%#

6.0%#8.0%#

-25.0%#

-20.0%#

-15.0%#

-10.0%#

-5.0%#

0.0%#

5.0%#

10.0%#

15.0%#

0.0#

2.0#

4.0#

6.0#

8.0#

10.0#

12.0#

14.0#

2011# 2012# 2013# 2014# 2015E# 2016E# 2017E#

Revenue#(US$#B)#-#LHS# Growth#-#RHS#

Page 3: Henry Fund Report - SLB - Tippie College of Businesstippie.biz.uiowa.edu/henry/reports15/SLB_fa15.pdf · SLBis&well& positioned& to& survive ... • SLB&has&astrong&business&portfolio&with&array&of

     

    Page  3        

SLB:  Drilling  Group  Revenue

Source:  Company  filings  -­‐  10K,  HF  estimates  

The  Production  Group  segment      

This   segment  provides  well   services   comprising  pressure  pumping,  well   cementing,   stimulation,   and   intervention;  well  completion  services  and  equipment,  such  as  packers,  safety  valves,  and  sand  control  technology,  as  well  as  well  completions   technology   and   equipment;   artificial   lifts;  and   coiled   tubing   equipment   and   services,   and   slickline  services,   as   well   as   engages   in   the   development,  management,   and   environmental   protection   of   water  resources.    

We  expect  Production  Group  revenue  to  decline  by  25%  in  CY15  primarily  due  to  decline  in  E&P  activities  in  North  America.  Pressure  pumping  activity  will  be  impacted.  

SLB:  Production  Group  Revenue

Source:  Company  filings  -­‐  10K,  HD  estimates  

Company  Analysis  –  Investment  rationale  

Numero  Uno  in  the  sector    

In   the   OFS   industry,   we   believe   that   SLB   is   widely  considered   the   technological   leader   and   it   is   the   largest  and   most   profitable   company   both   in   absolute   and  percentage  terms.  The  company’s  strong  position  can  be  attributable  to:  

Technology  Innovation:  With  a  technological  focus  at  the  core   of   the   SLB’s   culture   and   operations,   it   enjoys   a  technological   lead   over   its   competitors,  which   results   in  greater  efficiency,  productivity,  and  pricing  power  for  the  company  and,  hence,  higher  margins.  

Geographically   Diversified   Presence   and   Reach:    Generating   more   than   71%   of   revenue   outside   North  America  and  employing  a  multinational  workforce,  SLB  is  less   vulnerable   to   market   risk   as   a   result   of   geographic  diversification,   a  multinational  workforce   and   the   ability  to   pursue   emerging   markets   as   economic   and   political  climates  warrants.  

Extensive  Suite  of  Products:  SLB  offers  the  most  extensive  range   of   oilfield   products   and   services   in   the   industry,  which   offers   the   company   with   flexibility   in   serving   its  customers   and   allows   it   to   benefit   from   the   increasing  movement  by  customers  toward  integrated  services.  

SLB’s   less   dependence   on   US   E&P   sector  makes   it   less  vulnerable  

The   company’s   strong   international   footprint   is   a  sustainable  competitive  advantage  for  the  company.  The  scale   and   scope   of   the   company’s   international  operations   are   broader   than   any   other   company   in   the  sector,  with  about  70%  of  revenues  from  outside  of  North  America.   This   is   a   significant   position,   given   that   the  international  markets   and   the   NOCs  will   drive   the   long-­‐term   industry   growth.  Additionally,   SLB’s   critical  mass   in  the   regions   provides   operating   efficiencies,   and   thus  higher   operating   margins.   SLB   has   been   operating   in  many   developing  markets   for  many   decades  while  most  of   its   peers   have   only   recently   entered   into   the   same  regions.  

SLB:  Production  Group  Revenue

Source:  Company  filings  –  10Q  

 

13.9% 15.9% 17.1% 18.5% 14.2% 14.8% 16.0%

68.4%%

14.7%%7.6%% 8.0%%

.23.0%%

4.0%% 8.5%%

.40.0%%

.20.0%%

0.0%%

20.0%%

40.0%%

60.0%%

80.0%%

0.0%2.0%4.0%6.0%8.0%10.0%12.0%14.0%16.0%18.0%20.0%

2011% 2012% 2013% 2014% 2015E% 2016E% 2017E%

Revenue%(US$%B)%.%LHS% Growth%.%RHS%

13.1$ 14.8$ 15.9$ 18.1$ 13.6$ 14.1$ 15.3$

45.1%$

12.7%$7.6%$

13.7%$

-25.0%$

4.0%$8.5%$

-30.0%$

-20.0%$

-10.0%$

0.0%$

10.0%$

20.0%$

30.0%$

40.0%$

50.0%$

0.0$2.0$4.0$6.0$8.0$10.0$12.0$14.0$16.0$18.0$20.0$

2011$ 2012$ 2013$ 2014$ 2015E$ 2016E$ 2017E$

Revenue$(US$$B)$-$LHS$ Growth$-$RHS$ North&America&29%&

La1n&America&17%&

Europe/CIS/Africa&26%&

Middle&East/Asia&28%&

Page 4: Henry Fund Report - SLB - Tippie College of Businesstippie.biz.uiowa.edu/henry/reports15/SLB_fa15.pdf · SLBis&well& positioned& to& survive ... • SLB&has&astrong&business&portfolio&with&array&of

     

    Page  4        

Due  to  the  significant  fall  in  oil  prices  over  last  year,  most  of   the  E&P  companies  have  announced  significant  capex  cuts   over   past   year.   International   companies   have  announced   capital   expenditure   reductions   on   the   order  of   15-­‐20%,   while   USA   and   Canadian   companies   have  decreased  their  2015  spending  levels  by  more  than  30%.  The  capex  cuts  in  the  USA  shale  E&P  activities  were  even  more   significant   impacting   the   performance   of   OFS  companies  with  large  dependence  on  US  E&P  activities.  

We   anticipate   a   significant   time   correction   in   oil   prices  and  believe  that  OFS  companies  such  as  SLB,  which  have  less  dependence  on  North  American  E&P  activities  will  be  less   vulnerable   in   the   future.   North   American  unconventional   oil   and   gas   reserves   have   substantially  higher   extraction   and   production   cost   compared   to   the  conventional   reserves   in  Middle   East   and  Russia.   So,  we  don’t  expect  a   significant  decline   in   the  E&P  activities   in  rest  of  the  world  due  to  prolonged  lower  oil  prices.    

SLB’s  strong  presence  in  various  markets  across  the  world  is   likely   to   see   steady   demand   for   its   services   in   the  countries  with  conventional  oil  reserves.    

Land   Drilling   Rigs   Portfolio   Spanning   Across   the  World

Source:  Company  investor  presentation  

Leading   and   highly   technological   intensive   portfolio   of  products  and  services  creates  a  deep  moat  

SLB  has  a  stated  strategy  to  be  a  leading  player  in  all  of  its  operating   services/product   segments   and   has  consistently   invested   in   cutting   edge   technologies   that  create   a   better   understanding   of   the   reservoir.   This   is  increasingly  vital  as  reservoirs  become  more  complex.  SLB  offers   the   highest   exposure   to   Deepwater   and   is   also   a  leader  in  carbonate,  unconventional  gas,  and  pre-­‐salt.  

SLB   is   the   leading  company   in  a  number  of  high-­‐growth,  high   technology   product   lines,   ahead   of   its   peers   by   a  wide   margin   (10%   in   some   cases   in   terms   of   market  share).   The   company   is   #1   in   most   of   its  

products/services,   including   Wireline,   LWD,   Directional  Drilling,  Geophysical  equipment  &  services,  coiled  tubing,  production  testing  etc.  

Segmental  Market  Share  of  Top  OFS  Players

Source:  Spears  &  Associates  and  JP  Morgan    

Increasing  technical  challenges  for  E&P  companies  due  to  highly   complex   nature   of   Deepwater   and   tight   oil  reserves,   are   presenting   opportunities   for   technically  strong   and   operationally   competent   OFS   companies   like  SLB.   SLB’s   approach   of   providing   integrated   solution   to  the   customers   is   gaining   ground   and   would   help   SLB  enhance  its  position  in  the  industry  further.  

A   recent   trend   in   the   US   industry   is   turning   SLB   from   a  mere   service   provider   to   E&P   companies   to   being   a  partner  in  the  project.  Many  US  operators  are  asking  SLB  to   underwrite   their   high-­‐end   solutions   in   exchange   for  production   related   financial   incentives.   We   believe   that  technology   remains   the   key   growth   drivers   of   revenue  and  margin  growth  in  the  future  for  the  company.    

Cameron  acquisition  –  A  marriage  made  in  heaven  

Taking   the   advantage   of   current   downturn   in   the  industry,   SLB’s   move   to   acquire   Cameron   International  

Page 5: Henry Fund Report - SLB - Tippie College of Businesstippie.biz.uiowa.edu/henry/reports15/SLB_fa15.pdf · SLBis&well& positioned& to& survive ... • SLB&has&astrong&business&portfolio&with&array&of

     

    Page  5        

(CAM),  will  significantly  strengthen  company’s  position  in  OFS  industry.  SLB  expects  to  grow  the  combined  business  through   integration   of   reservoir,   well   and   surface  technology  with   instrumentation  and  control  to   launch  a  new   era   of   drilling   and   production   system.   SLB   also  expects   the   acquisition   to   be   earnings   accretive   in   very  first  year.  It  expects  to  generate  cost  synergies  of  $300M  in   first   year   and   $600M   in   the   second   year.  We   believe  that   SLB   will   benefit   from   expansion   in   customer   base  through  and  broadening  the  product  offering  through  this  acquisition.  The  good  thing  about  this  acquisition  is  there  is  very  little  overlap  between  the  services  provided  by  SLB  and  CAM.    

New  SLB  Group  Structure

 

Source:  Company  Investor  Presentation    

CAM,   with   its   90-­‐year   history   that   began   in   pressure-­‐control  technology,  is  one  of  the  premier  engineering  and  manufacturing   companies   in   our   industry,   with   a   broad  portfolio   of   surface-­‐related   drilling   and   production  products,   which   is   well-­‐balanced   between   offshore   and  land  markets.  Today,  CAM  holds  well-­‐established  market  leadership   positions   in   each   of   their   product   lines,   and  has   an   unprecedented   global   installed-­‐base   with  Cameron   wellheads,   found   on   one-­‐third   of   the   world’s  accessible  producing  wells.    

CAM:  Revenue  Contribution  by  Business  Segments

Source:  CAM  Company  filings  -­‐  10K  

Unparalleled  financial  track  record  boosts  confidence  

SLB   has   both   an   impressive   financial   track   record   and   a  solid  balance  sheet.  Through  its  focus  on  delivering  value-­‐added   technology   and   solutions,   SLB   has   steadily  increased   its   total   revenue   annually   to   $48.6B   from   its  low   point   in   1987   of   $4.4B,   reporting   a   compounded  annual  growth  rate  of  9%  over  the  past  28  years.  

Further,  SLB  has  an  extremely  strong  balance  sheet,  with  net  debt  of   just  $5.7B,  which   should  allow   the   company  to   continue   to   grow   both   organically   and   through  acquisitions.  Having  a  strong  financial  position  historically  has   enabled   the   company   to   maintain   R&D   spending  through  difficult  industry  times,  allowing  the  company  to  increase  its  technological  advantage.  

SLB’s   RoIC   is   much   higher   than   its   peers   due   to   strong  presence   in   international   markets.   SLB’s   ability   to  generate   strong   free   cash   flow   despite   difficult   industry  dynamics  is  a  big  positive  as  it  provides  investors  comfort  and  offers  SLB  to  create  shareholder  value  through  share  buyback  and  acquisitions.  

Stellar  Financial  Performance  Across  Business  Cycles

Source:  Company  financials  –  10K,  HF  estimates  

Strong  Balance  Sheet  despite  Various  Acquisitions

Source:  Company  financials  –  10K  

Subsea'29%'

Surface'23%'

Drilling'28%'

V&M'20%'

2162$ 1849$ 6747$ 7219$ 6196$ 1993$ 6138$

19.7%$ 19.2%$

22.1%$ 21.8%$

15.3%$

21.2%$19.7%$

0.0%$

5.0%$

10.0%$

15.0%$

20.0%$

25.0%$

0$

1000$

2000$

3000$

4000$

5000$

6000$

7000$

8000$

2011$ 2012$ 2013$ 2014$ 2015E$ 2016E$ 2017E$

FCF$(US$$M)$ RoIC$

5291% 5480% 8112% 9933% 11630% 13176% 13330%

10.5%%

7.0%% 7.1%%

10.9%%

12.6%%11.2%%

12.2%%

0.0%%

2.0%%

4.0%%

6.0%%

8.0%%

10.0%%

12.0%%

14.0%%

0%

2000%

4000%

6000%

8000%

10000%

12000%

14000%

2008% 2009% 2010% 2011% 2012% 2013% 2014%

Debt%(US$%M)% Leverage%

Page 6: Henry Fund Report - SLB - Tippie College of Businesstippie.biz.uiowa.edu/henry/reports15/SLB_fa15.pdf · SLBis&well& positioned& to& survive ... • SLB&has&astrong&business&portfolio&with&array&of

     

    Page  6        

 

Extraordinary   ability   to   weather   the   storm   in   the  industry    

We  are  highly  impressed  with  SLB’s  exceptional  ability  to  contain   the   damage   in   the   period   of   turbulence.   As  compared   to   the   previous   downturn   of   2009,   SLB   has  been   able   to   keep   margin   reduction   contained.   Even  though   the   revenue   decline   in   1H2015   is   higher  compared  to  1H2009,  the  margins  decline  is  much  lower.  This   has   been   possible   due   to   timely   reduction   in   the  workforce.   SLB   believes   that   its   workforce   is   now   right-­‐sized   to   match   the   current   depressed   activity  environment.  

Significant  Operational  Efficiency  Improvement

Source:  Company  Presentation  

Through   a   combination   of   proactive   cost   reduction  measures,  excellent  execution,  and  the  acceleration  of  its  transformation  initiatives,  SLB’s  margins  have  significantly  exceeded  other  players  through  the  downturn  so  far.  We  believe   that   SLB   is   well   positioned   to   weather   future  pricing  reductions  through  further  efficiency  gains.    

RECENT  DEVELOPMENTS  

SLB  announces  the  acquisition  of  CAM  

Towards   the   end   of   August   2015,   SLB   announced   the  acquisition   of   CAM.   SLB   agreed   to   pay   to   the  shareholders  of  CAM  $14.44  cash  and  0.716  shares  of  SLB  per   share   of   CAM   held.   The   acquisition   values   CAM   at  US$14.8B  or  $66/per  share,  a  premium  of  56%  to  CAM’s  most  recent  closing  share  price.  On  TTM  EV/EBITDA  basis,  the  valuation  stands  at  8.8x.  CAM  shareholders  will  own  ~10%   of   all   outstanding   shares   of   SLB   post   the  acquisition.  The  deal  is  expected  to  close  in  1Q2016.    

Though   the   premium  of   56%   looks   a   bit   on   higher   side,  we   note   that   the   price   of   CAM   shares   have   declined  substantially   in   last   one   year.   In   other   words,   the  

premium  paid  by  SLB  is  just  26%  to  CAM’s  year  old  price.  The   acquisition   gives   SLB   a   strong   presence   into   subsea  equipment   segment   and   strengthens   in   presence   in  offshore/subsea   segment.   We   think   that   the   timing   of  this   acquisition   was   great   given   the   bad   state   of   the  industry  and  generally  low  interest  in  this  sector.  Though  we  believe  that  the  SLB  could  have  bought  CAM  at  lower  price.    

CAM's  products  include  a  wide  range  of  pressure  control  and   rig   systems   for   onshore   and   offshore   drilling;   land  and   platform   production   systems   for   conventional   and  unconventional   applications;   separation,   processing,   and  treatment   systems;   subsea   production   and   processing  systems;   measurement   systems;   and   a   wide   variety   of  valves  and  actuators.  

The   combined   entity  will   generate   revenue  of   $48B   and  net  income  of  $5.7B  as  per  our  estimates  

2QCY15   result   was   above   consensus  estimates  

SLB   reported   better   results   than   consensus   estimates  although  there  was  a  decline  both  on  QoQ  and  YoY  basis  in   both   revenue   and   earnings.   The   company   reported  adjusted   EPS   of   US$0.88,   above   consensus   estimates   of  $0.79.   The   revenue   declined   12%   sequentially   and   25%  YoY  to  US$9B  while  EPS  declined  17%  sequentially.    

The  revenue  decline  was  led  by  sharp  39%  YoY  decline  in  North   American   business   while   international   revenues  declined   by   19%   YoY.   Operating   margins   of   North  American   business   declined   777bps   YoY  while   operating  margins  in  international  business  increased  by  44bps  YoY  despite  decline  in  revenues.    

Despite   the   much   more   challenging   market   conditions,  overall   pretax   operating   margins   were   maintained   at  levels  well  above  the  previous  downturns  as  the  company  continued   to   proactively   manage   costs   and   resources.  Despite  challenging  environment  the  company  generated  $1.5   billion   in   free   cash   flow,   representing   132%   of  earnings  for  the  quarter.    

In   the   first   half   of   2015,   YoY   revenue   dropped   26%   in  North  America  and  14%   internationally.   In  spite  of   these  declines   being   more   severe   than   those   of   the   2009  downturn,  SLB  delivered  first-­‐half  decremental  margins  of  37%   in   North   America   and   18%   internationally.   These  results   represent   a   marked   improvement   over   the  

Page 7: Henry Fund Report - SLB - Tippie College of Businesstippie.biz.uiowa.edu/henry/reports15/SLB_fa15.pdf · SLBis&well& positioned& to& survive ... • SLB&has&astrong&business&portfolio&with&array&of

     

    Page  7        

equivalent  figures  that  were  both  in  excess  of  70%  for  the  same  period  in  2009.    

Among   the   business   segments,   Production   Group  revenue   declined   18%   sequentially   driven   by   the  unprecedented   drop   in   both   activity   and   pricing   for  pressure   pumping   services   on   land   in   North   America.  Drilling   Group   and   Reservoir   Characterization   Group  revenues  fell  by  11%  and  5%,  respectively,  as  the  declines  in   development   drilling   activity   and   exploration-­‐related  services  moderated.  

Reservoir  Characterization  Group   revenue  of  $2.4  billion  declined  5%  sequentially,  primarily  due  to  sustained  cuts  in   exploration   spending   that   impacted   Wireline   and  Testing  Services  activities   in  Europe/CIS  &  Africa,   the  US  Gulf   of  Mexico,   and   Australia.   This   decline  was   partially  offset   by   increased   software   license   sales   and   by  WesternGeco   revenue   that   improved   slightly   on   higher  land   seismic   activity   in   North   Africa   and   in   the   United  Arab  Emirates.  

Drilling   Group   revenue   of   $3.5   billion   decreased   11%  sequentially,  primarily  due  to  a   further  drop   in   rig  count  in   North   America   that   impacted   activities   of   Drilling   &  Measurements  and  M-­‐I  SWACO.  Lower  drilling  activity   in  Sub-­‐   Saharan   Africa,   Australia   and   Colombia   also  contributed  to  the  decline.  

Production  Group  revenue  of  $3.1  billion  decreased  18%  sequentially   with   more   than   80%   of   the   decrease  attributable   to   North   America   land.   Pressure   pumping  activity  continued  to  fall  and  pricing  pressure  increased  as  land  rig  count  in  North  America  extended  its  decline.  

The   company   gave   a   negative   outlook   for   2HCY15   and  CY16   led   by   expectation   of   continued   low   oil   prices   for  some   time.   Management   expects   that   the   E&P  investment   in  North  America   is  expected  to   fall  by  more  than   35%   in   2015   driven   by   lower   land   activity   and  increased   pricing   pressure.   It   believes   that   the   North  American   rig   count   may   now   be   touching   the   bottom,  and   that   a   slow   increase   in   both   land   drilling   and  completion  activity  could  occur   in  the  second  half  of  the  year.  

In   the   international   market,   management   expects   the  E&P  spending  to  drop  more  than  15%.  It  does  not  expect  any  upward  adjustment  to  existing  2015  budgets  but  sees  a   continuation   of   first-­‐half   trends   with   low   exploration  activity,   tight   management   of   development-­‐related  spend,  and  continued  pricing  pressure.    

2QCY15  Revenue  Breakup  

Source:  Company  SEC  Filings  –  10Q  

INDUSTRY  TRENDS  

Deepwater   and   tight   oil   reserves   offer  opportunity  in  the  long  term  

In   the   long   term,   Deepwater   exploration   is   a   very  attractive   opportunity.   Deepwater   accounted   for   more  than   50%   of   the   conventional   new   reserves   added  between   2007   and   2012.   Substantial   discoveries   were  made   in   the   Gulf   of   Mexico,   Brazil,   West   Africa,   East  Africa   as   well   as   Mediterranean.   With   most   of   these  currently   in   the   discovery,   appraisal   and   development  phase,   the   proportion   of   oil   produced   from   Deepwater  fields  is  expected  to  grow  significantly.  The  World  Energy  Outlook   estimates   that   Brazil’s   offshore   oil   discoveries  will   triple  oil   production   to  6M  barrels  per  day  by  2035.  This   will   make   Brazil   the   6th   largest   oil   producer   in   the  world.    

Further,  Deepwater  projects  are  among  the  riskiest  and  most  technologically  complex.  As  a  result  they  are  highly  capital  intensive  and  typically  takes  5  to  8  years  to  bring  into  production.    

Further,   the   countries   like   China   and   Russia   have  significant   shale   oil   and   gas   reserves.   However   due   to  political  and  regulatory   issues  the  progress  on  extracting  these   reserves   has   been   slow.   We   believe   that   in   the  longer   term,   these   unconventional   reserves   offer   great  opportunities  for  all  OFS  companies  and  especially  for  SLB  given  its  strong  foothold  in  those  countries.    

E&P   companies   announcing   significant  capex  cuts  

Many   large   oil   production   and   exploration   companies  operating  in  US  have  cut  down  the  capex  for  2015  to  the  tune  of  30-­‐35%  of  their  earlier  budgets.  It  is  expected  that  if  the  prices  remains  at  current   level  for  next  2  quarters,  these   companies  will   announce   further   capex   cuts   as   at  

2QCY15 2QCY14 Change (%)Revenue by Business SegmentReservoir Characterization 2425 3231 -24.9Drilling 3511 4653 -24.5Production 3103 4208 -26.3Eliminations & other -29 -38 -23.7

Revenue by Geographic SegmentNorth America 2361 3888 -39.3Latin America 1537 1852 -17.0Europe/CIS/Africa 2413 3268 -26.2Middle East & Asia 2575 2966 -13.2Eliminations & other 124 80 55.0

Page 8: Henry Fund Report - SLB - Tippie College of Businesstippie.biz.uiowa.edu/henry/reports15/SLB_fa15.pdf · SLBis&well& positioned& to& survive ... • SLB&has&astrong&business&portfolio&with&array&of

     

    Page  8        

current   oil   price,   the   production   becomes   economically  unviable  in  most  parts  of  the  USA.  We  have  also  seen  the  capex   cuts   announced   by   companies   operating   in   RoW  markets   to   the   tune   of   15%.   This   is   something   unusual  and   did   not   happen   in   last   oil   downturn   in   2009.   This  makes   us   believe   that   the   industry   is   envisaging   a  sustained  low  oil  prices  for  next  couple  of  years.    

Rigs  count  stabilizing  around  the  world  

After  a  massive  60%  decline  in  North  American  active  rigs  count  over  the  past  one  year,  the  rigs  count  is  stabilizing.  We   have   not  witnessed   significant   closure   of   active   rigs  over   past   2   months.   In   fact   there   has   been   marginal  increase   in   number   of   active   rigs   over   past   3  months   in  North  America.  

The   active   rigs   in   Rest   of   the   World   geographies  witnessed  just  15%  decline  over  past  year  led  by  Europe,  which  reported  ~30%  decline  in  active  rigs  count.      

Active  Drilling  Rigs  Around  The  World

Source:  Baker  Hughes  

MARKETS  AND  COMPETITION  

The  oil   and  gas   field   services   industry   is   a   large   industry  consisting   many   diversified   service   providers   and   niche  service   providers.   The   industry   generated   total   revenue  of  $96B  with  profit  of  $12B  in  US  alone  in  latest  financial  year.   According   to   industry   estimates,   the   industry   has  growth   at   a   rate   of   0.3%   CAGR   over   past   5   years.   The  industry   is   expected   to   see   ~17%   decline   in   revenue   in  2015  due  to  decline  in  oil  prices.    

Highly  fragmented  industry  

Oil  &  Gas  field  services  industry  is  fragmented  with  top  3  players   holding   32%   market   share.   These   three  companies   are   Halliburton   Company   (11.8%   market  share),  Schlumberger  Ltd  (10.7%  market  share)  and  Baker  

Hughes   Inc.   (9.5%   market   share).   Concentration   is  particularly   low   among   companies   that   supply   support  services   for   oil   drilling   and   gas   extraction   on   land.  Conversely,  concentration  is  higher  in  the  offshore  oil  and  gas   extraction   services   segment,   because   these   services  have  greater  capital  requirements.    

Market  Share  Data  of  Key  Players

Source:  www.IBISWORLD.com  

Though   global   companies   like   Schlumberger   and  Halliburton  dominate  the   industry,   there  are  many  small  companies   in   the   industry   that  operate  successfully.  The  largest   operators   in   the   industry   have   the   advantage   of  working   on   a   wide   variety   of   projects   across   the   globe,  which   has   provided   them   with   experience   that   smaller  companies  typically  lack  in  managing  a  range  of  projects.  Smaller  companies  can  provide  similar  services,  but  they  typically  do  not  have   the   capital  or   scale   to  manage   the  largest  projects  in  the  United  States.  Oil  drilling  services  is  single   largest   sub   segment   of   oil   and   gas   field   services  with  revenue  share  of  22%.  

USA   Oil   and   Gas   Field   Services   industry   sub   segments

Source:  www.IBISWORLD.com  

Highly  cyclical  nature  of  the  industry  

Like   the   energy   sector,   the   Oil   &   Gas   field   services  industry   is   cyclical   over   a   long   term.   Ultimately,   the  industry   is   clearly   dependent   on   commodity   cycles.  

0"

500"

1000"

1500"

2000"

2500"

Sep" Oct" Nov" Dec" Jan" Feb" Mar" Apr" May" Jun" Jul" Aug"

RoW" North"Am"

Halliburton+Company,+11.8%+ Schulmberger+

Ltd,+10.7%+

Baker+Hughes+Inc,+9.5%+

Nabors,+3.20%+

Helmerich+&+Payne,+2.4%+

PTEN,+2.4%+

Others,+60.0%+

Page 9: Henry Fund Report - SLB - Tippie College of Businesstippie.biz.uiowa.edu/henry/reports15/SLB_fa15.pdf · SLBis&well& positioned& to& survive ... • SLB&has&astrong&business&portfolio&with&array&of

     

    Page  9        

However,   the   industry   is   highly   volatile   and   sensitive   to  the  short-­‐term  changes  in  oil  prices.  

Source:  www.IBISWORLD.com  

Competition  is  fierce  

Competition  in  this  industry  is  high  because  companies  all  provide   similar   services   and  must   therefore   compete  on  price   and   quality.   Competition   for   contracts   is   fierce   in  the  industry,  as  upstream  oil  and  gas  companies  typically  rely   on   the   largest   operators   for   complex   and   large   oil  and  gas  field  projects.  As  a  result,  small  scale  and  regional  companies   must   compete   for   available   projects.  Fortunately   for  these  smaller  companies,   the  emergence  of   hydraulic   fracturing   and  horizontal   drilling   techniques  has   spurred  high   levels   of   production   and   investment   in  oil   and   gas   field   services.   Consequently,   the   number   of  industry  operators  has  increased  at  an  annualized  rate  of  2.9%  to  11,848,  as  companies  have  entered  the  industry.  

Contracts   secured   by   industry   companies   are   largely  awarded  on  a  competitive  bid  basis.  Price  competition   is  often  the  primary  factor  in  determining  which  contractor  is   awarded   a   contract,   although   quality   of   service,  operational   and   safety   performance,   equipment  suitability   and   availability,   location   of   equipment,  reputation  and  technical  expertise  are  also  factors.  These  non-­‐   price   factors   depend   on   skill   levels   within   an  organization.   In  the  area  of  oil  and  gas  well  servicing,  an  important   competitive   factor   in   establishing   and  maintaining   long-­‐term   customer   relationships   is   having  an  experienced,  skilled  and  well-­‐trained  workforce.    

Industry   consolidation   taking   place   due   to   recent  downturn  in  industry  

There  has  been  some  industry  consolidation  over  the  past  five   years,   with   the   merger   of   Smith   International   and  Schlumberger  being   the  most   significant   in   this   industry.  

Decreasing   downstream   demand,   driven   by   low   natural  gas  prices,  has   also  put  pressures  on   industry  players   to  consolidate   and   improve   operating   efficiency.   In  November  2014,  Halliburton  announced  plans  to  acquire  its   competitor,   Baker   Hughes,   for   $34.6   billion.   This  acquisition  would  drastically  alter  the  global  landscape  of  oil   and   gas   field   service   companies.   Halliburton   cited   its  need  to  better  compete  with  SLB  as  a  primary  reason  for  acquiring   Baker  Hughes,   and   their   combined   catalogs   of  technology,   products   and   research   and   development  projects  will   enable   them   to  more   aggressively   compete  in   the   industry.   Recently,   SLB   acquired  CAM   in   a   $14.8B  deal.  Consequently,   small   companies  will  have  a  difficult  time   competing   for   large-­‐scale   contracts.   Nonetheless,  small  companies  will  still  be  able  to  acquire  contracts  for  small-­‐scale  oil  and  gas  extraction  projects,  as   the   largest  operators   typically   only   focus   on   the  most   complex   and  large-­‐scale  extraction  projects.  

Medium  barriers  to  entry  

Barriers  to  entry  in  the  Oil  and  Gas  Field  Services  industry  vary   depending   on   the   services   being   provided.   For  example,  simple  exploration  and  geological  services  have  fewer  barriers  than  offshore  drilling  services.  Overall,  the  level   of   barriers   to   entry   into   the   industry   is   considered  medium,  mostly  because  small  operators  can  participate  in   this   industry   by   providing   information,   research   and  management  services.  Barriers  to  entry  are  very  high  for  companies   that   provide   comprehensive   oil   and   gas  drilling  services.  Work  tends  to  be  won  by  operators  that  offer   not   only   competitive   prices   but   also   established  track   records,   making   it   difficult   for   new   entrants   to  establish  themselves,  particularly  for  contracts  relating  to  ongoing  well  maintenance  or  life-­‐of-­‐mine  management.    

A  brief  profile  of  key  players  

Halliburton  Company  

Halliburton  Company   (HAL)   is   one   of   the  world’s   largest  products  and  services  provider  to  the  energy  sector.  The  company   is   headquartered   in   Houston   and   has   77,000  employees   in   about   80   countries.  Halliburton   serves   the  upstream  oil  and  gas  industry  throughout  the  life  cycle  of  a   reservoir,   from   locating   hydrocarbons   and   managing  geological  data  to  drilling  and  formation  evaluation,  well  construction,  completion  and  optimizing  production.  

The   company   operates   through   its   completion   and  production   segment   and   its   drilling   and   evaluation  segment.  

Page 10: Henry Fund Report - SLB - Tippie College of Businesstippie.biz.uiowa.edu/henry/reports15/SLB_fa15.pdf · SLBis&well& positioned& to& survive ... • SLB&has&astrong&business&portfolio&with&array&of

     

    Page  10        

 Baker  Hughes  Inc.  

Baker   Hughes   Incorporated   (BHI)   is   a   comprehensive   oil  and   gas   drilling   services   provider   founded   in   1987   as   a  result   of   a   merger   between   Baker   International   and  Hughes  Tool  Company.  The  company  is  headquartered  in  Houston  and  operates  in  several  other  markets  across  the  world.  Baker  Hughes  has  about  60,000  employees  serving  customers   in   over   80   countries.   The   company   provides  drill   technology,   drilling   services   and   drilling   fluids   to   oil  and   gas   extractors.   BHI   also   offers   well   completion,  production   optimization   and   pressure   pumping   services.  In  2013,  BHI  generated  $22.4  billion  in  total  revenue.  

BHI’s   products   and   services   are   segmented   into   two  broad   business   segments:   drilling   and   evaluation   and  completion  and  production.  

Weatherford  International  Plc  

Ireland-­‐based  Weatherford  International  (WFT)  is  a  major  worldwide  OFS  provider.  The  company  currently  employs  about   67,000   people   in   more   than   100   countries.  Weatherford’s   primary   product   segments   include  artificial   lift   systems,   stimulation   and   chemicals,   drilling  services   and   well   construction.   Artificial   lift   systems   are  used  to  extract  oil  and  gas  from  wells  that  lack  sufficient  pressure.   The   stimulation   and   chemicals   segment  provides   drilling   fluids   and   chemical   compounds   that  increase  well  output.  This  business  segment  also  provides  hydraulic-­‐  fracturing  technology.  

Weatherford’s  US  oilfield  services  business   is  anticipated  to   generate   about   $4.2   billion   in   2015.   Revenue   has  increased  during   the  past   five  years  due   to   the   recovery  from   recessionary   lows.   However,   similar   to   other  industry   operators,   company   profitability   has   suffered  over  the  past   five  years  due  to   low  domestic  natural  gas  and  oil  prices.  

Peer  Comparisons  

Source:  Bloomberg,  Yahoo  Finance  

Source:  Bloomberg,  Yahoo  Finance  

We   compared   SLB   with   the   key   players   in   the   industry  based   on   certain   financial   and   valuation   parameters   in  the   tables   above.   We   note   that   the   financial   and  valuation  parameters   are  not   strictly   comparable  due   to  complex  portfolio  of  business  each  of  these  players  have  and   different   weightage   of   each   business   in   their  portfolio.    

We   believe   that   SLB   is   the   best   player   in   OFS   industry  based   on   financial   and   operational   parameters.   The  company  has  strong  presence  across  geographies  and  it  is  either  #1  or  #2  player   in  most  of   the  business   segments  and  geographies  it  operates  in.  

However,  we  think  that,  all  the  players  are  likely  to  hit  by  the   persistent   downturn   in   the   global   oil   prices   and   the  dependence  on  USA  oil  production.  However,  SLB  will  be  lease  impacted  among  all  because  is  low  exposure  to  the  US  business  as  compared  to  other  players.  

ECONOMIC  OUTLOOK  

We   believe   that   the   key   economic   indicators   for   oil  pipeline  industry  are  the  global  demand  and  supply  of  oil  and   the   global   prices   of   oil.   If   the   prices   of   oils   drop  globally,  it  results  into  reduced  domestic  production.    

World  oil  production  and  consumption  balance

Source:  EIA  Energy  short-­‐term  outlook  April  7,  2015  

Give   the   low   growth   in   fuel   consumption   growth   over  next   2   years   and   continuous   production   growth   in   Latin  America  and  OPEC  countries  will  keep  the  world  oil  prices  at  below  the  cost  of  production  of  majority  USA  oilfields  

Company PriceSchlumberger $75.0Baker:Hughes $53.4Cameron $65.0Weatherford $9.7Halliburton $37.1

P/E:16 P/B:16 EV/E:1619.4::::::::: 2.0::::::::::: 9.1J:::::::::: 1.3::::::::::: 10.7

22.0::::::::: 2.3::::::::::: 11.3J:::::::::: 1.2::::::::::: 8.6

21.6::::::::: 1.8::::::::::: 7.4

Key Financials (US$ B)Company Mkt+Cap Sales PAT RoESchlumberger 91.8 48.6 7.2 19%Baker7Hughes 23.3 24.5 1.7 1.4%Cameron 12.1 10.4 0.8 4.8%Weatherford 7.9 14.9 D0.6 DHalliburton 31.9 32.9 3.5 9.6%

Page 11: Henry Fund Report - SLB - Tippie College of Businesstippie.biz.uiowa.edu/henry/reports15/SLB_fa15.pdf · SLBis&well& positioned& to& survive ... • SLB&has&astrong&business&portfolio&with&array&of

     

    Page  11        

($60-­‐65)   making   things   difficult   for   oil   pipeline  companies.    

The   forecast   of   decline   in   stock   of   crude   oil   inventory  over  next  2  years  suggests  that  the  production  levels  will  at  best  maintained  at  current  level  if  not  curtailed.    

Also  the  world  oil  demand  and  supply  are  expected  to  go  hand   in  hand  and  unlikely   to  cause  a  scarcity  of  oil.  This  indicates  that  oil  prices  are  unlikely  to  go  up  in  hurry.  The  oil  prices  below  $55-­‐60  range  does  not  augur  well  for  the  growth   of   US   oil   production   industry.  We   expect   US   oil  production  to  decline  by  10-­‐15%  over  next  1  year.  

US  Crude  oil  Inventory

 Source:  EIA  Energy  short-­‐term  outlook  April  7,  2015  

Further,  if  the  global  GDP  growth  rate  is  higher,  it  augurs  well   for   the  demand  of  oil.  However,  World  Bank  report  projects   only   incremental   growth   in  world  GDP   and   it   is  unlikely  to  result   in  significant  demand  for  oil   in  medium  term.    

GDP  Growth  forecast  for  world

Source:  World  Bank,  January  2015  Global  economic  prospects  

Further  interest  rates  are  the  key  economic  driver  for  this  industry,   as   due   to   its   high   capital   intensity,   the   higher  interest   rates   will   increase   the   cost   of   capital   for   the  companies  in  this  industry.  

World   Bank   expects   the   policy   rates   in   the   developed  world  to  start  going  up  from  2015  onwards.  The  interest  rates  in  USA  are  expected  to  show  steep  rise  in  year  2016  compared   to   other   developed   countries.   We   expect  40bps  increase  in  10-­‐year  US  treasury  yield  by  the  end  of  2015.   High   capital-­‐intensive   industries   including   Oil  Production   and   Exploration  will   probably   find   it   difficult  to   undertake   new   projects   limiting   the   production  growth.  

Government  policy  rates  forecast

 Source:  World  Bank,  Bloomberg  

CATALYSTS  FOR  GROWTH  

The  key  value  drivers   for   this   industry  are  price  of  crude  oil,   production   of   oil,   and   demand   of   oil.   Essentially,   a  lower  demand  of  oil  will  result  into  lower  oil  prices,  which  in   turn   reduce   the   production   of   oil.   Reduction   in  production   of   oil   results   into   lower   demand   for   oil   and  gas   equipment   and   services   industry.   The   prices   of   oil  globally   are   not   only   decided   by   demand   and   supply  economics,   but   other   factors   like   political   stability   in  major   oil   producing   regions   as   well   as   international  politics  are  other  key  important  drivers  of  oil  prices.  

We  believe  that  the  industry  is  likely  to  slow  down  if  the  current   low   oil   prices   persist   for   longer   period.   The   key  catalyst   for   this   industry   to   report   reasonable   growth  would  be  continuous  increase  in  production  of  oil  by  USA.  This  is  only  possibly  if  the  global  oil  prices  bounce  back  to  about  $80  per  barrel  over  next  2  quarters.  The  increase  in  oil   prices   is   possible   over   next   few   months   if   OPEC  decides  to  cut  its  production  to  spruce  up  the  prices.  

 

 

Page 12: Henry Fund Report - SLB - Tippie College of Businesstippie.biz.uiowa.edu/henry/reports15/SLB_fa15.pdf · SLBis&well& positioned& to& survive ... • SLB&has&astrong&business&portfolio&with&array&of

     

    Page  12        

Drivers  of  investment  thesis  

• SLB  has  a   strong  business  portfolio  with  array  of  services   offered   by   it   to   E&P   companies.   This  along  with  its  long  track  record  makes  it  a  partner  of  choice  for  E&P  companies  across  the  world.  

• SLB’s   dependence   on  US   oil   and  Gas   production  sector   is   much   lower   than   some   of   the   other  companies   in   the   sector,   which   makes   it   less  vulnerable  to  a  downturn  in  the  US  E&P  activities.  

• The  current  downturn  in  the  industry  offers  great  opportunity   to   SLB   to   strengthen   its   position   by  acquiring   other   smaller   but   quality   companies  like   Cameron.   Such   acquisitions   will   strengthen  SLBs  dominance  in  the  industry.  

• SLBs   strong   financial   performance   amid  downturn   in  the   industry  talks  volume  about  the  management’s   ability   to   protect   the   interest   of  shareholders.    

Risks  to  investment  thesis  

• A   significant   reduction   in   the   oil   prices   from  current  level  would  have  adverse  impact  on  SLB’s  business  

• Increase   in   competitive   from   the  merger   of   HAL  and  BHI  may  impact  the  business.      

VALUATION  

Our   investment   thesis   is   the  outcome  of   careful  analysis  of   OFS   industry,   macro   economic   outlook   and  preparation  of  detailed  financial  modeling.  In  this  part  of  the   report   we   will   explain   you   briefly   about   the   key  assumptions   behind   the   financial  model   and   investment  thesis.  

Key  assumptions  in  financial  model  

Revenue  to  decline  over  next  2  years  

We   expect   the   revenue   of   SLB   to   decline   by   24%   to  US$37.1B   in   2015   led   by   decline   in   all   major   business  segments   due   to   significant   reduction   in   E&P   activities  across   the   world.   However   the   revenue   will   increase  significantly   in   2016   on   the   back   of   acquisition   of   CAM.  We   expect   the   revenue   to   grow   by   29%   yoy   in   2016   to  US$48B.  Without  the  consolidation  of  CAM,  the  revenue  is  expected  to  remain  flat  in  2016.  The  decline  in  revenue  in   2015  will   be  primarily   led  by  North  America,  which   is  likely  to  see  35%  decrease  followed  by  Europe/CIS/Africa  

region,   which   is   likely   to   report   24%   decline   for   the  period.    

We   forecast   revenue   growth   to   normalize   from   FY17  onwards  due  to  steady  increase  in  USA  oil  production  and  exploration  activities.  We  expect  terminal  growth  of  4.5%  for  SLB  from  2021.    

Significant  operating  profit  margin  contraction    

We  estimate  operating  profit  margins  of  SLB   to  contract  by  260  bps  in  2015  led  by  North  America  region,  which  is  expected   to   see   ~6%   drop   in   margins.   Margins   are  expected   to   drop   significantly   by   80bps   in   2016   due   to  low   margin   profile   of   CAM.   However,   we   expect  operating  margins  to  start  inching  up  from  2017  onwards  on  the  back  of  recovery  in  industry.    

Return  to  fall  in  2015;  Cash  flows  to  remain  firm  

We   expect   that   RoIC   will   be   contracted   temporarily   in  2015  due   to   sharp  38%   fall   in  net   income.  However,  we  expect  return  ratios  to  start   improving  2016  onwards  on  the  back  of   cost   synergies  generated   from  CAM  merger.  We  expect  FCF  to  fall   to  US$2B   in  2015  from  US$6.1B   in  2014.  However,  FCF  will  substantially  improve  from  2016  onwards.      

Discounted   Cash   Flow/Economic   Profit  (DCF/EP)  

The  DCF/EP  model  generates  a  target  price  of  $117.  This  model  is  based  on  a  4.5%  CV  growth  rate  discounted  at  a  weighted   average   cost   of   capital   (WACC)   of   7.29%.   This  represents   a   56%  price   premium   to   the   closing   price   on  9/17/15.   The   recent   sell   off   in   the   energy   sector   was  driven  by  a  ~50%  decline  in  WTI  and  Brent  crude  oil  prices  due   to   street   sentiment   regarding   ongoing   headwinds  facing  the  global  economy  combined  with  record  levels  of  crude  oil  production  and  supply.  We  believe  that  this  is  a  great  opportunity  to  buy  SLB  at  significant  discount  to  its  intrinsic  value.  

Dividend  Discount  Model  (DDM)  

The   DDM   returned   a   current   target   price   of   $87.43,   a  16.57%  premium  to   the  current  market  price  and  25.3%  lower   than   the   DCF/EP   model.   SLB   has   maintained   it  dividend   payout   ratio   constant   between   25-­‐30%   over  past   6   years   despite   significant   growth   in   profits.   It   has  rather   utilized   the   excess   free   cash   flow   to   keep   strong  balance   sheet   and   grow   inorganically.   We   like   this  approach   as   the   size   of   SLB   has   helped   it   become  more  

Page 13: Henry Fund Report - SLB - Tippie College of Businesstippie.biz.uiowa.edu/henry/reports15/SLB_fa15.pdf · SLBis&well& positioned& to& survive ... • SLB&has&astrong&business&portfolio&with&array&of

     

    Page  13        

profitable   and   gain  market   share   from   competitors.  We  estimate  the  per  share  dividend  to  increase  from  current  level   of   $1.5   to   $6   in   FY21   if   it   does   not   go   for   big  acquisitions  in  the  future.  

Relative  valuation    

We   have   compared   SLB   with   other   large,   multinational  OFS   companies   like   HAL,   BHI   and   WFT.   All   these  companies  have  presence  in  many  international  markets.  We   understand   that   these   companies   are   not   strictly  comparable   with   each   other   given   their   relative  difference  in  size  and  business  model.  We  have  compared  the   valuation   of   these   companies   based   on   EV/EBITDA,  and  price/book  method  because  earnings  of  BHI  and  HAL  are  expected  to  be  negative/very  low.  

The  relative  P/B  model  and  EV/EBITDA  model  returned  a  target   price   of   $62   and   $77   respectively.   However,   we  believe   that   the   target   price   arrived   based   on   relative  valuation   does   not   differentiate   many   qualitative   and  quantitative   differences   factors.   We   believe   that   SLB  should  trade  at  least  a  50%  premium  multiple  to  its  peers  given   its   superior   balance   sheet,   historical   growth   and  return   ratios.   So   the   target   prices   based   on   relative  valuation  works  out  to  be  $105/share.  

Overall,   we   reference   the   DCF/EP   and   DDM   valuation  model  in  deriving  our  target  price  range  as  that  valuation  most   accurately   captures   SLBs   current   operating   profile  and   the   underlying   revenue   growth   components.   The  Relative   valuation   models   provide   supporting   evidence  and  may  help   substantiate  assumptions  used   in  our  DCF  and  DDM  analysis.      

   

KEYS  TO  MONITOR  

There   is   couple  of   key   things   to  monitor   for   investors   in  this  industry.      

Global  oil  prices:  

Oil   price   is   the   significant   determinant   of   the  performance   of   this   industry   in   the  medium   term   basis.  Currently,   the   oil   prices   are   multi   year   low.   The  movement  of  oil  prices  over  next  2  quarters  will  be  a  key  thing  to  monitor  

 

 

Domestic  production  level  of  oil:  

The   performance   of   oil   &   gas   equipment   and   services  industry  is  directly  related  to  the  domestic  oil  production  levels.    

REFERENCES  

1) “Short-­‐term  Energy  Outlook”,  U.S.  Energy  Information  Administration,  April  17,  2015  http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/steo/  

2) “Effect  of  declining  crude  oil  prices  on  U.S.  production”  http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=19171  

3) IBISWorld  –  U.S.  Industry  Reports  –  Oil  &  Gas  Field  Services    

4) Bloomberg  –  Historical  Volatility,  Beta,  Relative  Valuation    

5) Factset  6) Company  fillings  of  SLB,  BHI,  HAL,  WFT  7) Baker  Hughes    8) www.finance.yahoo.com  9) SLB  2QFY15  Earnings  Transcript    10) JP  Morgan  Analyst  report  

IMPORTANT  DISCLAIMER  

Henry  Fund  reports  are  created  by  student  enrolled  in  the  Applied  Securities  Management  (Henry  Fund)  program  at  the   University   of   Iowa’s   Tippie   School   of   Management.  These   reports   are   intended   to   provide   potential  employers  and  other  interested  parties  an  example  of  the  analytical   skills,   investment   knowledge,   and  communication   abilities   of   Henry   Fund   students.   Henry  Fund   analysts   are   not   registered   investment   advisors,  brokers   or   officially   licensed   financial   professionals.   The  investment   opinion   contained   in   this   report   does   not  represent  an  offer  or  solicitation  to  buy  or  sell  any  of  the  aforementioned  securities.  Unless  otherwise  noted,  facts  and   figures   included   in   this   report   are   from   publicly  available   sources.   This   report   is   not   a   complete  compilation   of   data,   and   its   accuracy   is   not   guaranteed.  From   time   to   time,   the   University   of   Iowa,   its   faculty,  staff,   students,   or   the   Henry   Fund   may   hold   a   financial  interest  in  the  companies  mentioned  in  this  report.  

 

 

 

Page 14: Henry Fund Report - SLB - Tippie College of Businesstippie.biz.uiowa.edu/henry/reports15/SLB_fa15.pdf · SLBis&well& positioned& to& survive ... • SLB&has&astrong&business&portfolio&with&array&of

     

    Page  14        

 

 

Schlumberger+LtdKey$Assumptions$of$Valuation$Model

Ticker'Symbol SLBCurrent'Share'Price $73.70Current'Model'Date 18/11/15Fiscal'Year'End Dec.+31

PreGTax'Cost'of'Debt 2.80%Post'tax'cost'of'Debt 1.82%Beta 1.2RiskGFree'Rate 2.20%Equity'Risk'Premium 4.85%CV'Growth 5%Current'Dividend'Yield 2.13%Marginal'Tax'Rate 35%Cost'of'equity 8.0%WACC 7.29%CV'ROE 13.2%

Stock'Price'DCFGEP'Method 117.01Stock'Price'DDM'Method 87.43Stock'Price'relative'valuation'Method 105.00

Page 15: Henry Fund Report - SLB - Tippie College of Businesstippie.biz.uiowa.edu/henry/reports15/SLB_fa15.pdf · SLBis&well& positioned& to& survive ... • SLB&has&astrong&business&portfolio&with&array&of

     

    Page  15        

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Schlumberger+LtdRevenue&Decomposition

Fiscal'Years'Ending'Dec.'31

Revenue ModelOil Field Services % of Total Sales % changeDrilling % change % of OFSReservoir Production % change % of OFS

2012 2013 2014 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E

41,731.0 45,266.0 48,580.0 37,128.8 38,740.3 42,009.4 44,974.4 47,876.3 50,494.1 52,766.4100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

12.9% 8.5% 7.3% -23.6% 4.3% 8.4% 7.1% 6.5% 5.5% 4.5%15,892.0 17,099.0 18,462.0 14,215.7 14,784.4 16,041.0 17,163.9 18,193.7 19,103.4 19,963.1

14.7% 7.6% 8.0% -23.0% 4.0% 8.5% 7.0% 6.0% 5.0% 4.5%38.1% 37.8% 38.0% 38.3% 38.2% 38.2% 38.2% 38.0% 37.8% 37.8%

14,802.0 15,927.0 18,111.0 13,583.3 14,126.6 15,327.3 16,476.9 17,547.9 18,600.8 19,437.812.7% 7.6% 13.7% -25.0% 4.0% 8.5% 7.5% 6.5% 6.0% 4.5%35.5% 35.2% 37.3% 36.6% 36.5% 36.5% 36.6% 36.7% 36.8% 36.8%

Reservoir Characterization % of OFS % changeElimination/Others % of OFS % change

11,159.0 12,463.0 12,224.0 9,473.6 10,042.0 10,845.4 11,604.6 12,416.9 13,037.7 13,624.426.7% 27.5% 25.2% 25.5% 25.9% 25.8% 25.8% 25.9% 25.8% 25.8%12.4% 11.7% -1.9% -22.5% 6.0% 8.0% 7.0% 7.0% 5.0% 4.5%-122.0 -223.0 -217.0 -143.8 -212.7 -204.3 -270.9 -282.2 -247.8 -258.9<0.3% <0.5% <0.4% <0.4% <0.5% <0.5% <0.6% <0.6% <0.5% <0.5%

-458.8% 82.8% -2.7% -33.7% 47.9% -3.9% 32.6% 4.2% -12.2% 4.5%

Total Revenues % change

Geographic+Split+of+RevenueNorth'America

Latin'America

Europe/CIS/Africa

Middle'East/Asia

Elimination/Others

Total+Revenue

41731 45266 48580 37129 38740 42009 44974 47876 50494 5276612.9% 8.5% 7.3% -23.6% 4.3% 8.4% 7.1% 6.5% 5.5% 4.5%

13535 13897 16151 10,498.2 10,498.2 11,233.0 12,019.3 12,740.5 13,377.5 13,979.59.3% 2.7% 16.2% -35.0% 0.0% 7.0% 7.0% 6.0% 5.0% 4.5%7554 7754 7699 6,159.2 6,528.8 7,116.3 7,650.1 8,185.6 8,676.7 9,067.2

16.8% 2.6% -0.7% -20.0% 6.0% 9.0% 7.5% 7.0% 6.0% 4.5%11510 12411 12515 9,511.4 9,891.9 10,683.2 11,431.0 12,116.9 12,722.7 13,295.319.0% 7.8% 0.8% -24.0% 4.0% 8.0% 7.0% 6.0% 5.0% 4.5%8717 10767 11875 10,450.0 11,286.0 12,414.6 13,283.6 14,213.5 15,066.3 15,744.3

12.9% 23.5% 10.3% -12.0% 8.0% 10.0% 7.0% 7.0% 6.0% 4.5%415 437 340 510.0 535.5 562.3 590.4 619.9 650.9 680.2

23.5% 5.3% -22.2% 50.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 4.5%

41731 45266 48580 37129 38740 42009 44974 47876 50494 5276614.1% 8.5% 7.3% -23.6% 4.3% 8.4% 7.1% 6.5% 5.5% 4.5%

Cameron+International

Business+Segment+RevenueSubsea

Surface

Drilling

V&M

Elimination/Others

2061 2813 3067 2,514.9 2,615.5 2,772.5 2,938.8 3,085.8 3,240.0 3,385.8-83.3% 36.5% 9.0% -18.0% 4.0% 6.0% 6.0% 5.0% 5.0% 4.5%1859 2077 2411 1,977.0 2,095.6 2,263.3 2,421.7 2,567.0 2,695.4 2,816.7

-71.3% 11.7% 16.1% -18.0% 6.0% 8.0% 7.0% 6.0% 5.0% 4.5%1807 2327 3049 2,744.1 2,853.9 3,053.6 3,267.4 3,463.4 3,636.6 3,800.3

-81.3% 28.8% 31.0% -10.0% 4.0% 7.0% 7.0% 6.0% 5.0% 4.5%2168 2105 2125 1,806.3 1,950.8 2,145.8 2,317.5 2,479.7 2,628.5 2,746.8

-71.9% -2.9% 1.0% -15.0% 8.0% 10.0% 8.0% 7.0% 6.0% 4.5%<100 <184 <271 -216.8 -227.6 -239.0 -251.0 -263.5 -276.7 -289.1

-129.8% 84.0% 47.3% -20.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 4.5%Total+Revenue 7795 9138 10381 8826 9288 9996 10694 11332 11924 12460

-78.7% 17.2% 13.6% -15.0% 5.2% 7.6% 7.0% 6.0% 5.2% 4.5%

Page 16: Henry Fund Report - SLB - Tippie College of Businesstippie.biz.uiowa.edu/henry/reports15/SLB_fa15.pdf · SLBis&well& positioned& to& survive ... • SLB&has&astrong&business&portfolio&with&array&of

     

    Page  16        

 

 

Schlumberger+LtdIncome'Statement

Fiscal'Years'Ending'Dec.'31 2012 2013 2014 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E

Total Revenue - Costs of Goods and Services - Depreciation and AmortizationGross Profit - SG&A expenses - R&D expenses - Other operating expensesOperating Income - Interest Expense - Interest Income - Losses (Gains) from affiliates - Net Non-Operating Losses (Gains)Pretax Income - Income Tax Expense - Deffered Income Tax ExpenseIncome Before XO Items - Extraordinary Loss Net of Tax - Minority InterestsNet Income - Other Adjustments

41,731.0 45,266.0 48,580.0 37,128.8 48,028.4 52,005.6 55,668.9 59,208.7 62,418.0 65,226.829,385.0 31,300.0 33,304.0 25,358.9 32,659.3 35,259.8 37,576.5 39,788.3 41,820.0 43,701.9

3,500.0 3,879.0 4,094.0 4,250.9 4,380.5 5,068.7 5,346.2 5,679.2 6,012.2 6,456.28,846.0 10,087.0 11,182.0 7,519.0 10,988.6 11,677.1 12,746.2 13,741.3 14,585.7 15,068.6

405.0 416.0 475.0 371.3 1,681.0 1,768.2 1,892.7 1,953.9 2,059.8 2,152.51,153.0 1,174.0 1,217.0 891.1 1,200.7 1,040.1 1,113.4 1,184.2 1,248.4 1,304.5

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 360.2 390.0 417.5 444.1 468.1 489.27,288.0 8,497.0 9,490.0 6,256.6 7,746.7 8,478.8 9,322.5 10,159.1 10,809.4 11,122.4340.0 391.0 369.0 373.2 339.9 372.4 312.4 252.4 222.4 222.4172.0 165.0 291.0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

7,120.0 8,271.0 9,412.0 5,883.3 7,406.8 8,106.4 9,010.2 9,906.8 10,587.1 10,900.11,776.0 1,953.0 2,149.0 1,529.7 1,925.8 2,269.8 2,522.9 2,773.9 2,964.4 3,052.0

-76.0 -105.0 -221.0 -176.5 -222.2 -243.2 -270.3 -297.2 -317.6 -327.05,420.0 6,423.0 7,484.0 4,530.2 5,703.2 6,079.8 6,757.6 7,430.1 7,940.3 8,175.0-260.0 69.0 205.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

29.0 42.0 68.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 57.0 63.0 70.0 74.05,651.0 6,312.0 7,211.0 4,490.2 5,658.2 6,029.8 6,700.6 7,367.1 7,870.3 8,101.0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Adjusted Net Income 5,651.0 6,312.0 7,211.0 4,490.2 5,658.2 6,029.8 6,700.6 7,367.1 7,870.3 8,101.0

Basic Adjusted EPS 4.25 4.77 5.57 3.53 3.86 4.10 4.53 4.96 5.28 5.41No+of+Shares+outstandingDividend+Per+ShareDividend+Payment

Cost0of0good0sold/RevenueDepreciation/Opening0PPE0balanceSG&A0Expenses/RevenueR&D0Expenses/RevenueOther0operating0Expenses/RevenueOperating+Profit+marginInterest0expense/opening0debt0balance

Income0Tax/Pretax0IncomeDeffered0Tax/Pretax0Income

1,330.0 1,323.0 1,295.0 1,271.2 1,465.8 1,472.0 1,478.2 1,484.4 1,490.6 1,496.81.08 1.22 1.52 1.60 2.00 2.50 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00

M1432.0 M1608.0 M1968.0 M2034 M2932 M3680 M4434 M5937 M7453 M89810.0980 0.1229 0.1671 M0.3657 0.0929 0.0612

70.4% 69.1% 68.6% 68.3% 68.0% 67.8% 67.5% 67.2% 67.0% 67.0%11.8% 11.7% 11.6% 11.5% 11.1% 11.1% 11.1% 11.1% 11.1% 11.1%1.0% 0.9% 1.0% 1.0% 3.5% 3.4% 3.4% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3%2.8% 2.6% 2.5% 2.4% 2.5% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0%0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8%

17.5% 18.8% 19.5% 16.9% 16.1% 16.3% 16.7% 17.2% 17.3% 17.1%3.4% 3.4% 2.8% 2.8% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0%

24.9% 23.6% 22.8% 26.0% 26.0% 28.0% 28.0% 28.0% 28.0% 28.0%M1.1% M1.3% M2.3% M3.0% M3.0% M3.0% M3.0% M3.0% M3.0% M3.0%

Page 17: Henry Fund Report - SLB - Tippie College of Businesstippie.biz.uiowa.edu/henry/reports15/SLB_fa15.pdf · SLBis&well& positioned& to& survive ... • SLB&has&astrong&business&portfolio&with&array&of

     

    Page  17        

 

 

 

Schlumberger+LtdBalance'Sheet

Fiscal'Years'Ending'Dec.'31

Assets Cash & Near Cash Items Short-Term Investments Accounts & Notes Receivable Inventories Other Current AssetsTotal Current Assets LT Investments & LT Receivables Net Fixed Assets Gross Fixed Assets (-) Accumulated Depreciation Other Long-Term Assets - Goodwill - Other intangible assets - Derivative and Hedging assets - Investment in unconsolidted entities - Others, netTotal Long-Term AssetsTotal Assets

Liabilities & Shareholders' Equity Accounts Payable Short-Term Borrowings Other Short-Term LiabilitiesTotal Current Liabilities Long-Term Borrowings Other Long-Term LiabilitiesTotal Long-Term LiabilitiesTotal Liabilities Share Capital & APIC Treasury Stock Retained earnings Other Equity Minority InterestTotal EquityTotal Liabilities & Equity

ASSETSAccounts(receivable/RevenueInventory/RevenueOther(current(assets/RevenueCapex

2012 2013 2014 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E

1,905.0 3,472.0 3,130.0 2,528.7 3,000.7 9,397.3 10,845.4 12,807.1 14,050.8 13,316.44,369.0 4,898.0 4,371.0 5,371.0 6,371.0 7,371.0 8,371.0 9,371.0 10,371.0 11,371.0

11,351.0 11,497.0 11,171.0 8,910.9 12,007.1 13,521.5 14,251.2 14,920.6 15,604.5 16,306.74,785.0 4,603.0 4,628.0 3,712.9 6,724.0 7,540.8 7,793.6 7,993.2 8,114.3 8,153.31,746.0 1,755.0 1,394.0 1,113.9 1,825.1 2,132.2 2,449.4 2,723.6 2,871.2 3,196.1

24,156.0 26,225.0 24,694.0 21,637.3 29,927.9 39,962.8 43,710.7 47,815.4 51,011.9 52,343.6245.0 363.0 442.0 442.0 442.0 442.0 442.0 442.0 442.0 442.0

14,780.0 15,096.0 15,396.0 13,645.1 13,548.6 10,979.9 8,633.7 5,954.5 3,942.3 2,486.133,168.0 35,164.0 36,964.0 39,464.0 45,664.0 48,164.0 51,164.0 54,164.0 58,164.0 63,164.018,388.0 20,068.0 21,568.0 25,818.9 32,115.4 37,184.1 42,530.3 48,209.5 54,221.7 60,677.922,366.0 25,416.0 26,372.0 26,672.0 39,902.0 40,202.0 40,502.0 40,802.0 41,102.0 41,402.014,585.0 14,706.0 15,487.0 15,487.0 27,487.0 27,487.0 27,487.0 27,487.0 27,487.0 27,487.0

4,802.0 4,709.0 4,654.0 4,654.0 5,384.0 5,384.0 5,384.0 5,384.0 5,384.0 5,384.028.0 55.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0

1,502.0 3,317.0 3,235.0 3,235.0 3,235.0 3,235.0 3,235.0 3,235.0 3,235.0 3,235.01,449.0 2,629.0 2,964.0 3,264.0 3,764.0 4,064.0 4,364.0 4,664.0 4,964.0 5,264.0

37,146.0 40,512.0 41,768.0 40,317.1 53,450.6 51,181.9 49,135.7 46,756.5 45,044.3 43,888.161,547.0 67,100.0 66,904.0 62,396.5 83,820.5 91,586.7 93,288.4 95,014.0 96,498.2 96,673.7

10,247.0 10,742.0 11,411.0 8,910.9 12,967.7 14,145.5 15,253.3 16,282.4 17,164.9 17,937.42,121.0 2,783.0 2,765.0 2,765.0 3,028.0 3,028.0 3,028.0 3,028.0 3,028.0 3,028.0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.012,368.0 13,525.0 14,176.0 11,675.9 15,995.7 17,173.5 18,281.3 19,310.4 20,192.9 20,965.4

9,509.0 10,393.0 10,565.0 8,565.0 9,384.0 7,384.0 5,384.0 4,384.0 4,384.0 4,384.04,812.0 3,547.0 4,114.0 2,970.3 3,265.9 3,276.4 3,507.1 3,670.9 3,745.1 3,913.6

14,321.0 13,940.0 14,679.0 11,535.3 12,649.9 10,660.4 8,891.1 8,054.9 8,129.1 8,297.626,689.0 27,465.0 28,855.0 23,211.2 28,645.6 27,833.9 27,172.4 27,365.3 28,322.0 29,263.011,912.0 12,192.0 12,495.0 12,302.0 14,120.1 14,120.1 14,120.1 14,120.1 14,120.1 14,120.16,160.0 8,135.0 11,772.0 12,979.0 1,609.1 1,609.1 1,609.1 1,609.1 1,609.1 1,609.1

32,887.0 37,966.0 41,333.0 43,789.3 46,515.9 48,865.8 51,132.0 52,561.6 52,979.1 52,099.7-3,888.0 -2,554.0 -4,206.0 -4,166.0 -4,136.0 -4,096.0 -4,056.0 -4,016.0 -3,976.0 -3,936.0

107.0 166.0 199.0 239.0 284.0 334.0 391.0 454.0 524.0 598.034,858.0 39,635.0 38,049.0 39,185.3 55,174.9 57,614.8 59,978.0 61,510.6 62,038.1 61,272.761,547.0 67,100.0 66,904.0 62,396.5 83,820.5 85,448.7 87,150.4 88,876.0 90,360.2 90,535.7

0.0 0.0 E6,138.0 E6,138.0 E6,138.0 E6,138.0 E6,138.0

27.2% 25.4% 23.0% 24.0% 25.0% 26.0% 25.6% 25.2% 25.0% 25.0%11.5% 10.2% 9.5% 10.0% 14.0% 14.5% 14.0% 13.5% 13.0% 12.5%4.2% 3.9% 2.9% 3.0% 3.8% 4.1% 4.4% 4.6% 4.6% 4.9%

$3,617.00 $1,996.00 $1,800.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $4,000.00 $5,000.00

LIABILITIESAccounts(payable/RevenueOther(current(liabilities/RevenueOther(long(term(liabilities/Revenue

24.6% 23.7% 23.5% 24.0% 27.0% 27.2% 27.4% 27.5% 27.5% 27.5%0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

11.5% 7.8% 8.5% 8.0% 6.8% 6.3% 6.3% 6.2% 6.0% 6.0%

Page 18: Henry Fund Report - SLB - Tippie College of Businesstippie.biz.uiowa.edu/henry/reports15/SLB_fa15.pdf · SLBis&well& positioned& to& survive ... • SLB&has&astrong&business&portfolio&with&array&of

     

    Page  18        

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Schlumberger+LtdCash%Flow%Statement

Fiscal%Years%Ending%Dec.%31

Cash From Operating Activities + Net Income + Depreciation & Amortization + Other Non-Cash Adjustments + Changes in Non-Cash Capital Short Term investmets Accounts & Notes Receivable Inventories Other Current Assets Accounts Payable Other Short-Term Liabilities + Income from discontinued operationsCash From Operations

Cash From Investing Activities + Disposal of Fixed Assets + Capital Expenditures + Increase in LT Inv + Net cash from discontinued operations + Other Investing ActivitiesCash From Investing Activities

Cash from Financing Activities + Dividends Paid + Change in Short-Term Borrowings + Increase in Long-Term Borrowings + Change in Minority Interest + Increase in Capital Stocks +Other changes in retained earnings + Other Financing ActivitiesCash from Financing ActivitiesNet Changes in Cash

Beginning+Cash+BalanceEnding+Cash+Balance

2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E

4,490.2 5,658.2 6,029.8 6,700.6 7,367.1 7,870.3 8,101.04,250.9 4,380.5 5,068.7 5,346.2 5,679.2 6,012.2 6,456.2

-44.7 -3,761.8 -2,460.5 -1,192.1 -1,113.9 -1,070.1 -1,293.7-1,000.0 -1,000.0 -1,000.0 -1,000.0 -1,000.0 -1,000.0 -1,000.02,260.1 -3,096.2 -1,514.4 -729.8 -669.4 -683.9 -702.2

915.1 -3,011.1 -816.8 -252.8 -199.5 -121.2 -39.0280.1 -711.2 -307.2 -317.2 -274.2 -147.6 -324.9

-2,500.1 4,056.8 1,177.9 1,107.7 1,029.1 882.5 772.40.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

+ Income from discontinued operations8,696.3 6,277.0 8,638.0 10,854.8 11,932.3 12,812.4 13,263.6

6,138.0-2,500.0 -4,284.0 -2,500.0 -3,000.0 -3,000.0 -4,000.0 -5,000.0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 -12,000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

-300.0 -1,230.0 -300.0 -300.0 -300.0 -300.0 -300.0-2,800.0 -17,514.0 3,338.0 -3,300.0 -3,300.0 -4,300.0 -5,300.0

-2,033.9 -2,931.5 -3,679.9 -4,434.5 -5,937.4 -7,452.8 -8,980.50.0 263.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

-2,000.0 819.0 -2,000.0 -2,000.0 -1,000.0 0.0 0.040.0 45.0 50.0 57.0 63.0 70.0 74.0

-1,360.0 13,218.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

-1,143.7 295.6 10.4 230.8 163.8 74.1 168.5-6,497.6 11,709.1 -5,579.5 -6,106.7 -6,670.6 -7,268.6 -8,698.0

-601.3 472.1 6,396.5 1,448.1 1,961.7 1,243.7 -734.4

3,130.0 2,528.7 3,000.7 9,397.3 10,845.4 12,807.1 14,050.82,528.7 3,000.7 9,397.3 10,845.4 12,807.1 14,050.8 13,316.4

Page 19: Henry Fund Report - SLB - Tippie College of Businesstippie.biz.uiowa.edu/henry/reports15/SLB_fa15.pdf · SLBis&well& positioned& to& survive ... • SLB&has&astrong&business&portfolio&with&array&of

     

    Page  19        

 

 

 

 

Schlumberger+LtdValue&Driver&Estimation

Fiscal&Years&Ending&Dec.&31

Operating*RevenueLess*COGS*(excl*depr*&*amort)Less*depreciation*&*amortizationLess*SG&A*and*other*costsPlus*implied*interest*on*operating*leasesEBITA

Less*Adjusted*Taxes:Marginal*Tax*Rate*Provision*for*income*taxesPlus*tax*shield*on*unusual*expensePlus*tax*shield*on*implied*lease*interest*expPlus*tax*shield*on*interest*expense

2012 2013 2014 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E

41731 45266 48580 37129 48028 52006 55669 59209 62418 6522729385 31300 33304 25359 32659 35260 37576 39788 41820 437023500 3879 4094 4251 4381 5069 5346 5679 6012 64561558 1590 1692 1262 3242 3198 3424 3582 3776 394636 41 40 41 43 46 49 52 55 59

7324 8538 9530 6297 7790 8525 9371 10211 10864 11181

25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25%1700 1848 1928 1353 1704 2027 2253 2477 2647 272522 49 134 0 0 0 0 0 0 09 10 10 10 11 12 12 13 14 15

85 98 92 93 85 93 78 63 56 56Less*tax*shield*on*nonoperating*income

Total*Adjusted*Taxes

Deferred*Tax*LiabilityDeferred*Tax*AssetPlus:*Change*in*Deferred*TaxesNOPLAT

Invested+CapitalOperating*Current*Assets

Cash*(make*sure*not*excess)Trade*&*other*receivables,*netInventoryOther*current*assets

Total*operating*current*assetsOperating*Liabilities

Accounts*payableIncome*tax*payableAccrued*PayrollMiscellaneous*Current*Liabilities

Total*operating*current*liabilities

Net+Operating+Working+CapitalPlus:*Net*PPEPlus:*PV*of*operating*leasesPlus:*Net*intangible*assets,*excluding*g/wLess:*Other*operating*liabilitiesInvested+Capital+(IC)

Value+DriversReturn+on+Invested+Capital+(ROIC)CY*NOPLATPY*Invested*CapitalROIC

Free+Cash+Flow+(FCF)CY*NOPLATCY*Invested*CapitalPY*Invested*CapitalFCF

Economic+Profit+(EP)PY*Invested*CapitalROICWACCEP

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01816 2005 2164 1457 1799 2131 2343 2553 2716 2795

1,493.0 1,708.0 1,296.0 1119 897 654 384 87 \231 \5580.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

\238 215 \412 \177 \222 \243 \270 \297 \318 \3275270 6748 6954 4664 5769 6151 6758 7361 7831 8059

1905 3472 3130 2529 3001 9397 10845 12807 14051 1331611351 11497 11171 8911 12007 13521 14251 14921 15604 163074785 4603 4628 3713 6724 7541 7794 7993 8114 81531746 1755 1394 1114 1825 2132 2449 2724 2871 319619787 21327 20323 16266 23557 32592 35340 38444 40641 40973

10247 10742 11411 8911 12968 14146 15253 16282 17165 17937

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 010247 10742 11411 8911 12968 14146 15253 16282 17165 17937

9540 10585 8912 7355 10589 18446 20086 22162 23476 2303514780 15096 15396 13645 13549 10980 8634 5955 3942 24861446 1441 1454 1552 1650 1741 1849 1957 2102 22834802 4709 4654 4654 5384 5384 5384 5384 5384 5384

30568 31831 30416 27206 31172 36551 35953 35458 34904 33188

5270 6748 6954 4664 5769 6151 6758 7361 7831 805927412 30568 31831 30416 27206 31172 36551 35953 35458 3490419.2% 22.1% 21.8% 15.3% 21.2% 19.7% 18.5% 20.5% 22.1% 23.1%

5270 6748 6954 4664 5769 6151 6758 7361 7831 805930568 31831 30416 27206 31172 36551 35953 35458 34904 3318827412 30568 31831 30416 27206 31172 36551 35953 35458 34904

+++++++++++2,113+ +++++++++++5,485+ +++++++++++8,369+ +++++++++++7,873+ +++++++++++1,803+ ++++++++++++++772+ +++++++++++7,356+ +++++++++++7,856+ +++++++++++8,384+ +++++++++++9,775+

27412 30568 31831 30416 27206 31172 36551 35953 35458 3490419.2% 22.1% 21.8% 15.3% 21.2% 19.7% 18.5% 20.5% 22.1% 23.1%7.3% 7.3% 7.3% 7.3% 7.3% 7.3% 7.3% 7.3% 7.3% 7.3%

+++++++++++3,272+ +++++++++++4,520+ +++++++++++4,634+ +++++++++++2,448+ +++++++++++3,786+ +++++++++++3,879+ +++++++++++4,094+ +++++++++++4,741+ +++++++++++5,247+ +++++++++++5,515+

Page 20: Henry Fund Report - SLB - Tippie College of Businesstippie.biz.uiowa.edu/henry/reports15/SLB_fa15.pdf · SLBis&well& positioned& to& survive ... • SLB&has&astrong&business&portfolio&with&array&of

     

    Page  20        

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Schlumberger+LtdCommon%Size%Income%Statement

Fiscal%Years%Ending%Dec.%31

Total Revenue - Purchase and related costs - Depreciation and AmortizationGross Profit - SG&A Expenses - R&D Expenses - Other operating ExpensesOperating Income - Interest Expense - Foreign Exchange Losses (Gains) - Net Non-Operating Losses (Gains)Pretax Income - Income Tax Expense - Deffered Income Tax ExpenseIncome Before XO Items - Extraordinary Loss Net of Tax - Minority InterestsNet Income - Other adjustmentsNet Inc Avail to Common Shareholders

2012 2013 2014 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E

100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%70.42% 69.15% 68.55% 68.30% 68.00% 67.80% 67.50% 67.20% 67.00% 67.00%

8.39% 8.57% 8.43% 11.45% 9.12% 9.75% 9.60% 9.59% 9.63% 9.90%21.20% 22.28% 23.02% 20.25% 22.88% 22.45% 22.90% 23.21% 23.37% 23.10%0.97% 0.92% 0.98% 1.00% 3.50% 3.40% 3.40% 3.30% 3.30% 3.30%2.76% 2.59% 2.51% 2.40% 2.50% 2.00%0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.75% 0.75%

17.46% 18.77% 19.53% 16.85% 16.13% 16.30% 16.75% 17.16% 17.32% 17.05%0.81% 0.86% 0.76% 1.01% 0.71% 0.72% 0.56% 0.43% 0.36% 0.34%0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

17.06% 18.27% 19.37% 15.85% 15.42% 15.59% 16.19% 16.73% 16.96% 16.71%4.26% 4.31% 4.42% 4.12% 4.01% 4.36% 4.53% 4.68% 4.75% 4.68%

-0.18% -0.23% -0.45% -0.48% -0.46% -0.47% -0.49% -0.50% -0.51% -0.50%12.99% 14.19% 15.41% 12.20% 11.87% 11.69% 12.14% 12.55% 12.72% 12.53%-0.62% 0.15% 0.42% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%0.07% 0.09% 0.14% 0.11% 0.09% 0.10% 0.10% 0.11% 0.11% 0.11%

13.54% 13.94% 14.84% 12.09% 11.78% 11.59% 12.04% 12.44% 12.61% 12.42%0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

13.54% 13.94% 14.84% 12.09% 11.78% 11.59% 12.04% 12.44% 12.61% 12.42%

Schlumberger+LtdCommon%Size%Balance%Sheet

Fiscal%Years%Ending%Dec.%31

Assets Cash & Near Cash Items Short-Term Investments Accounts & Notes Receivable Inventories Other Current AssetsTotal Current Assets LT Investments & LT Receivables Net Fixed Assets Gross Fixed Assets (-) Accumulated Depreciation Other Long-Term Assets

2012 2013 2014 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E

3.10% 5.17% 4.68% 4.05% 3.58% 10.26% 11.63% 13.48% 14.56% 13.77%7.10% 7.30% 6.53% 8.61% 7.60% 8.05% 8.97% 9.86% 10.75% 11.76%

18.44% 17.13% 16.70% 14.28% 14.32% 14.76% 15.28% 15.70% 16.17% 16.87%7.77% 6.86% 6.92% 5.95% 8.02% 8.23% 8.35% 8.41% 8.41% 8.43%2.84% 2.62% 2.08% 1.79% 2.18% 2.33% 2.63% 2.87% 2.98% 3.31%

39.25% 39.08% 36.91% 34.68% 35.70% 43.63% 46.86% 50.32% 52.86% 54.14%0.40% 0.54% 0.66% 0.71% 0.53% 0.48% 0.47% 0.47% 0.46% 0.46%

24.01% 22.50% 23.01% 21.87% 16.16% 11.99% 9.25% 6.27% 4.09% 2.57%53.89% 52.41% 55.25% 63.25% 54.48% 52.59% 54.84% 57.01% 60.27% 65.34%29.88% 29.91% 32.24% 41.38% 38.31% 40.60% 45.59% 50.74% 56.19% 62.77%36.34% 37.88% 39.42% 42.75% 47.60% 43.90% 43.42% 42.94% 42.59% 42.83%

Total Long-Term AssetsTotal Assets

Liabilities & Shareholders' Equity Accounts Payable Short-Term Borrowings Other Short-Term LiabilitiesTotal Current Liabilities Long-Term Borrowings Other Long-Term LiabilitiesTotal Long-Term LiabilitiesTotal Liabilities Total Preferred Equity Minority Interest Share Capital & APIC Retained Earnings & Other EquityTotal EquityTotal Liabilities & Equity

60.35% 60.38% 62.43% 64.61% 63.77% 55.88% 52.67% 49.21% 46.68% 45.40%100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%

16.65% 16.01% 17.06% 14.28% 15.47% 15.44% 16.35% 17.14% 17.79% 18.55%3.45% 4.15% 4.13% 4.43% 3.61% 3.31% 3.25% 3.19% 3.14% 3.13%0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

20.10% 20.16% 21.19% 18.71% 19.08% 18.75% 19.60% 20.32% 20.93% 21.69%15.45% 15.49% 15.79% 13.73% 11.20% 8.06% 5.77% 4.61% 4.54% 4.53%

7.82% 5.29% 6.15% 4.76% 3.90% 3.58% 3.76% 3.86% 3.88% 4.05%23.27% 20.77% 21.94% 18.49% 15.09% 11.64% 9.53% 8.48% 8.42% 8.58%43.36% 40.93% 43.13% 37.20% 34.17% 30.39% 29.13% 28.80% 29.35% 30.27%19.35% 18.17% 18.68% 19.72% 16.85% 15.42% 15.14% 14.86% 14.63% 14.61%10.01% 12.12% 17.60% 20.80% 1.92% 1.76% 1.72% 1.69% 1.67% 1.66%53.43% 56.58% 61.78% 70.18% 55.49% 53.35% 54.81% 55.32% 54.90% 53.89%-6.32% -3.81% -6.29% -6.68% -4.93% -4.47% -4.35% -4.23% -4.12% -4.07%56.64% 59.07% 56.87% 62.80% 65.83% 62.91% 64.29% 64.74% 64.29% 63.38%

100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 93.30% 93.42% 93.54% 93.64% 93.65%

Page 21: Henry Fund Report - SLB - Tippie College of Businesstippie.biz.uiowa.edu/henry/reports15/SLB_fa15.pdf · SLBis&well& positioned& to& survive ... • SLB&has&astrong&business&portfolio&with&array&of

     

    Page  21        

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Schlumberger+LtdWeighted(Average(Cost(of(Capital((WACC)(Estimation

Equity DebtShares'outstanding'(Mn) 1,295''''''' Book'value'of'debt'(ST'&'LT) 11,330'''''Price'per'share 73.70''''''' Increase'in'FV'of'debt

Operating'leases 1,454'''''''Market'value'equity 95,442''''' Total'debt 12,784'''''

Weight'of'equity 0.88''''''''' Weight'of'debt 0.12'''''''''

Beta'(3'year) 1.20''''''''' Cost'of'debt,'preQtax 2.80%Risk'free'rate'(30Qyr'US'TQBond)'as'of'2/25/15 2.20%Market'risk'premium'(1928Q2013'TQBond) 4.85% Marginal'Tax'rate 35.00%Cost+of+Equity+by+CAPM+Model 8.02% After+tax+cost+of+debt 1.82%

WACC 7.29%

Present'Value'of'Operating'Lease'Obligations'(2014) Present'Value'of'Operating'Lease'Obligations'(2013)

Operating OperatingFiscal.Years.Ending.Dec..31 Leases Fiscal.Years.Ending.Dec..31 Leases2015 330 2014 3182016 259 2015 2462017 197 2016 1952018 156 2017 1652019 134 2018 136Thereafter 554 Thereafter 558Total.Minimum.Payments 1630 Total.Minimum.Payments 1618Less:.Interest 176 Less:.Interest 177PV.of.Minimum.Payments 1454 PV.of.Minimum.Payments 1441

Capitalization'of'Operating'Leases Capitalization'of'Operating'Leases

PreKTax.Cost.of.Debt 2.80% PreKTax.Cost.of.Debt 2.80%Number.Years.Implied.by.Year.6.Payment 4.1 Number.Years.Implied.by.Year.6.Payment 4.1

Lease PV.Lease Lease PV.LeaseYear Commitment Payment Year Commitment Payment1 330 321.0 1 318 309.32 259 245.1 2 246 232.83 197 181.3 3 195 179.54 156 139.7 4 165 147.75 134 116.7 5 136 118.56.&.beyond 134 449.8 6.&.beyond 136 453.2PV.of.Minimum.Payments 1453.6 PV.of.Minimum.Payments 1441.0

Page 22: Henry Fund Report - SLB - Tippie College of Businesstippie.biz.uiowa.edu/henry/reports15/SLB_fa15.pdf · SLBis&well& positioned& to& survive ... • SLB&has&astrong&business&portfolio&with&array&of

     

    Page  22        

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Schlumberger+Ltd

Discounted+Cash+Flow+(DCF)+and+Economic+Profit+(EP)+Valuation+Models

Key$Inputs:$$$$$CV$Growth 4.50%$$$$$CV$ROIC 22%$$$$$WACC 7.29%$$$$$Cost$of$Equity 8.02%

Fiscal+Years+Ending+Dec.+31 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E

DCF+Model

NOPLAT 4664 5769 6151 6758 7361 7831 8059Change$in$Invested$Capital P3209 3966 5379 P598 P495 P554 P1716FCF 7873 1803 772 7356 7856 8384 9775Continuing$value 230187Periods$to$discount 0 1 2 3 4 5 5PV$of$FCF$discounted$by$WACC 7,873$$$$$$$$$$ 1680 671 5956 5929 5898 161932Value+of+operating+assets 1,89,940+++++

Plus$Investment$in$unconsolidated$entities 3235Less$debt 13330Less$Other$non$operating$liabilities 2818Less$Minority$Interest 11772Less$PV$of$operating$leases 1454Value$of$equity 163801Shares$outstanding 1478Intrinsic+value+(per+share)+as+of+12/31/14 109.31

EP+Model

Economic$profit$to$discount 2448 3786 3879 4094 4741 5247 5515Continuing$value 195282Periods$to$discount 0 1 2 3 4 5 5PV$of$FCF$discounted$by$WACC 2,448$$$$$$$$$$ 3529 3370 3315 3578 3691 137377PV$(Economic$Profit) 1,57,308$$$$$Plus$beginning$invested$capital 30416

Value+of+operating+assets 187723

Plus$Investment$in$unconsolidated$entities 3235Less$debt 13330Less$Other$non$operating$liabilities 2818Less$Minority$Interest 11772Less$PV$of$operating$leases 1454Value$of$equity 161585Shares$outstanding 1478Intrinsic+value+(per+share)+as+of+12/31/14 109.31

Initnsic+value+per+share+as+of+today $117.01

Page 23: Henry Fund Report - SLB - Tippie College of Businesstippie.biz.uiowa.edu/henry/reports15/SLB_fa15.pdf · SLBis&well& positioned& to& survive ... • SLB&has&astrong&business&portfolio&with&array&of

     

    Page  23        

 

 

Schlumberger+LtdDividend'Discount'Model'(DDM)'or'Fundamental'P/E'Valuation'Model

Fiscal'Years'Ending'Dec.'31 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E

EPS 3.53$/////// 3.86$/////// 4.10$/////// 4.53$/////// 4.96$/////// 5.28$/////// 5.41$///////

Key$Assumptions///CV/growth 5%///CV/ROE 13.2%///Cost/of/Equity 8.0%

Future$Cash$Flows/////P/E/Multiple/(CV/Year) 18.7/////EPS/(CV/Year) 5.41/////Future/Stock/Price 101.4/////Dividends/Per/Share 1.60 2.00 2.50 3.00 4.00 5.00/////Future/Cash/Flows 1.60 2.00 2.50 3.00 4.00 5.00 101.43$///

0 1 2 3 4 5 5/////Discounted/Cash/Flows 1.60 1.85 2.14 2.38 2.94 3.40 68.97

Intrinsic+Value 81.68$+++++

Initnsic+value+per+share+as+of+today $87.43

Page 24: Henry Fund Report - SLB - Tippie College of Businesstippie.biz.uiowa.edu/henry/reports15/SLB_fa15.pdf · SLBis&well& positioned& to& survive ... • SLB&has&astrong&business&portfolio&with&array&of

     

    Page  24        

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Schlumberger+LtdKey$Management$Ratios

Fiscal$Years$Ending$Dec.$31

Liquidity(RatiosCurrent'ratioQuick'ratioCash'ratio

Activity(or(Asset2Management(RatiosAccounts'Receivable'TurnoverInventory'TurnoverNet'Working'Capital'TurnoverFixed'Asset'TurnoverTotal'Asset'Turnover

Financial(Leverage(RatiosDebt/Equity'RationInterest'Coverage'Ratio

Profitability(RatiosGross'MarginsOperating'MarginsRoERoIC

Payout(Policy(RatiosDividend'Payout'Ratio

2012 2013 2014 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E

2.0 1.9 1.7 1.9 1.9 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.51.4 1.5 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.8 1.8 1.9 2.00.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.7

4.0 4.0 4.3 3.7 4.6 4.1 4.0 4.1 4.16.2 6.7 7.2 6.1 6.3 4.9 4.9 5.0 5.23.3 3.1 3.4 2.9 3.2 2.4 2.1 2.0 1.93.0 3.0 3.2 2.6 3.5 4.2 5.7 8.1 12.60.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7

0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.121.5 21.8 25.8 16.9 22.9 22.9 30.0 40.5 48.9

21.2% 22.3% 23.0% 20.3% 22.9% 22.5% 22.9% 23.2% 23.4%17.5% 18.8% 19.5% 16.9% 16.1% 16.3% 16.7% 17.2% 17.3%16.2% 15.9% 19.0% 11.5% 10.3% 10.5% 11.2% 12.0% 12.7%19.2% 22.1% 21.8% 15.3% 21.2% 19.7% 18.5% 20.5% 22.1%

25.3% 25.5% 27.3% 45.3% 51.8% 61.0% 66.2% 80.6% 94.7%