Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of Flux Transfer Events

29
[email protected] a Space & Atmospheric Studies Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of Flux Transfer Events Kathryn McWilliams and Matt Wessel University of Saskatchewan

description

Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of Flux Transfer Events. Kathryn McWilliams and Matt Wessel University of Saskatchewan. FTE Models. From Scholer, 1995. FTEs at the Magnetopause. bipolar field variation. (Russell & Elphic, 1979). Flux Transfer Events at the Magnetopause. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of Flux Transfer Events

Page 1: Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of  Flux Transfer Events

[email protected] & Atmospheric Studies Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of Flux Transfer Events

Kathryn McWilliams and Matt WesselUniversity of Saskatchewan

Page 2: Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of  Flux Transfer Events

[email protected] & Atmospheric Studies Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

From Scholer, 1995

FTE ModelsFTE Models

Page 3: Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of  Flux Transfer Events

[email protected]

FTEs at the MagnetopauseFTEs at the Magnetopause

(Russell & Elphic, 1979)

bipolar field variation

Page 4: Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of  Flux Transfer Events

[email protected] Fall AGU Meeting Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

Magnetopause(Equator-S)

Ionosphere(SuperDARN)

(Neudegg et al., 2001)

Flux Transfer Events at the MagnetopauseFlux Transfer Events at the Magnetopause

bipolar boundary-normal FTE signatures

poleward moving radar auroral forms (PMRAFs)

Page 5: Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of  Flux Transfer Events

[email protected] Fall AGU Meeting Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

Poleward Moving Radar Patches (STARE)Poleward Moving Radar Patches (STARE)

• poleward moving patches during Aug 28, 1978, storm

• patches emanate from polar cap boundary

(Sofko et al., 1979; 1985)

Page 6: Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of  Flux Transfer Events

[email protected] Fall AGU Meeting Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

STARE Patches & GEOS-2 M’pause CrossingsSTARE Patches & GEOS-2 M’pause Crossings

(Sofko et al., 1979; 1985)

GEOS-2footprintin patch

upwellingions

GEOS-2footprintpolewardof patch

10X fewerupwelling

ions

Page 7: Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of  Flux Transfer Events

[email protected] Fall AGU Meeting Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

Pulsed Ionospheric Flows (PIFs) vs. PMRAFsPulsed Ionospheric Flows (PIFs) vs. PMRAFs

oscillating flow magnitude(with continuous data)

discrete poleward movingpatches (with data gaps)

PMRAFsPMRAFs

PIFsPIFs

Page 8: Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of  Flux Transfer Events

[email protected]

MHD Simulation – No Dipole TiltMHD Simulation – No Dipole Tilt

• Raeder, Annales Geophysicae, 2006

• “Stagnation line” – separates northward and southward flow

• Relatively smooth flow away from subsolar point (Earth-Sun line)

• No evident plasmoids

• Reconnection relatively smooth

Space & Atmospheric Studies Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

Page 9: Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of  Flux Transfer Events

[email protected]

MHD Simulation – Large Dipole TiltMHD Simulation – Large Dipole Tilt

• Raeder, Annales Geophysicae, 2006

• “Stagnation line” located off Earth-Sun line, towards winter hemisphere

• Reconnection X-line forms winter-ward of Sun-Earth line

• Plasmoid forms in region of flow towards winter cusp

• Field lines draped around plasmoid from summer cusp form second X-line

• Plasmoid moves towards winter cusp

• No plasmoid observed in summer hemisphere

Space & Atmospheric Studies Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

Page 10: Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of  Flux Transfer Events

[email protected]

3D Simulations – Development Along Magnetopause3D Simulations – Development Along Magnetopause

• Raeder, Annales Geophysicae, 2006

Space & Atmospheric Studies Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

Page 11: Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of  Flux Transfer Events

[email protected] Fall AGU Meeting Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

2-D Electric Field in Footprint of Reconnection2-D Electric Field in Footprint of Reconnection• Patch of

SuperDARN backscatter:– footprint of

reconnected field lines

– measured by two overlapping SuperDARN radars (CUTLASS)

• Compared patch motion to ExB drift

(McWilliams et al., 2001)

Page 12: Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of  Flux Transfer Events

[email protected] Fall AGU Meeting Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

• patch expands and moves azimuthally• convection speed differs from patch motion at first

2-D Electric Field in Footprint of Reconnection2-D Electric Field in Footprint of Reconnection

Page 13: Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of  Flux Transfer Events

[email protected] Fall AGU Meeting Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

• Two phases of motion: (1) reconnection (2) convection

• FTEs are not necessarily “small”

2-D Electric Field in Footprint of Reconnection2-D Electric Field in Footprint of Reconnection

1

2

Page 14: Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of  Flux Transfer Events

[email protected] & Atmospheric Studies Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

Recent ObservationsRecent Observations

• Korotova & Sibeck, GRL, 2008

• Considered m’pause crossings

• Interball-1 on dayside only during northern summer months; north=summer, south=winter

• Included only FTEs during neg. IMF Bz– Bz < -1 nT

• Interball-1 FTEs observed exclusively in WINTER hemisphere

Page 15: Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of  Flux Transfer Events

[email protected] & Atmospheric Studies Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

Signatures of FTEsSignatures of FTEs

4 hours UT

Geotail FTEs

SuperDARN poleward moving forms 18 Jan 1999 (NH winter)

McWilliams et al., AG, 2004

Page 16: Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of  Flux Transfer Events

[email protected] & Atmospheric Studies Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

Survey of Poleward Moving Radar Auroral FormsSurvey of Poleward Moving Radar Auroral Forms

• only examined poleward moving forms (PMRAFs)

• no modulated continuous drifts (PIFs)

• Radar Frequency is important!

• Before 2002 used single day and single night transmitter frequency

• Con: You have to be lucky to get good propagation

• Pro: Motion of patches is geophysicalfrequency change

Page 17: Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of  Flux Transfer Events

[email protected] & Atmospheric Studies Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

Survey of SuperDARN PMRAFsSurvey of SuperDARN PMRAFs

• Noted days when PMRAFs evident (visual inspection)

• viewing angle important

Page 18: Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of  Flux Transfer Events

[email protected] & Atmospheric Studies Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

Comparing N&S Hem.Comparing N&S Hem.

• The “one hope” frequency makes things difficult

• Not guaranteed that radio wave will refract enough to scatter back from cusp/mantle patches

Kerguelen = SH

Hankasalmi = NH

Ker Han

Page 19: Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of  Flux Transfer Events

[email protected] & Atmospheric Studies Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

Question Answered!Question Answered!

• …sort of• Simultaneous poleward

moving form in winter and summer hemisphere

• This is RARE

Page 20: Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of  Flux Transfer Events

[email protected] & Atmospheric Studies Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

Seasonal Dependence?Seasonal Dependence?

• Hankasalmi data only – Does not run “sounding” mode, so patch motion is geophysical

• Visual inspection of PMRAFs over nearly a full solar cycle

• 1997 – 2006

• FTE: 1893 days

• No FTE: 3468 days

(~35% FTE)

Page 21: Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of  Flux Transfer Events

[email protected] & Atmospheric Studies Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

Probably Not…Probably Not…• Our day-frequency is not

optimized for season

• So we take what we can get

• The number of days with FTEs strongly resembles the amount of ionospheric backscatter overall throughout the year

• No seasonal trend in SuperDARN PMRAFs

Page 22: Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of  Flux Transfer Events

[email protected]

Summary and Future WorkSummary and Future Work

• Study motivated by simulations and observations of FTEs in winter hemisphere– Modelled plasmoids form in on winter side of Sun-Earth line– Modelled plasmoids carried through winter cusp– FTEs detected in winter hemisphere by Interball-1

• Reconnection footprint should map to both hemispheres, so particles are expected to precipitate into both hemispheres, regardless of where plasmoid forms

• SuperDARN does not see seasonal dependence on occurrence of PMRAFs– Simultaneous observations by Hankasalmi and Kerguelen

• More sophisticated analysis of statistics is required– More detail on duration of PMRAFs, beams involved, etc.– Relationship to upstream IMF orientation

Space & Atmospheric Studies Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

Page 23: Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of  Flux Transfer Events

[email protected] & Atmospheric Studies Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

Page 24: Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of  Flux Transfer Events

[email protected] Fall AGU Meeting Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

• FTEs observed at Geotail only under certain IMF conditions (+By and +Bz).

• SuperDARN transients suggest FTEs occurred at all times, regardless of IMF orientation.

FTEs

SuperDARN PMRAFs

IMFBy

(McWilliams et al., 2004)

IMFBz

Geotail

Page 25: Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of  Flux Transfer Events

[email protected] & Atmospheric Studies Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

Page 26: Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of  Flux Transfer Events

[email protected] & Atmospheric Studies Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

Page 27: Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of  Flux Transfer Events

[email protected] & Atmospheric Studies Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

Page 28: Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of  Flux Transfer Events

[email protected] & Atmospheric Studies Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

Page 29: Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of  Flux Transfer Events

[email protected] & Atmospheric Studies Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan