Helsinki 2012

116

description

In Helsinki the topic was "Shorelines" and that was a good opportunity to go back and reflect on our early work in Supertanker - based and focused on the Copenhagen Harbour.

Transcript of Helsinki 2012

Page 1: Helsinki 2012
Page 2: Helsinki 2012

URBAN MAPPING: IN AND ABOUT COPENHAGEN HARBOUR

Page 3: Helsinki 2012

URBANISTS: LOCALISING AND CONCEPTUALISING ACTIVISM

CONCEPTUALLY INFORMED PRACTICE AND PRACTICALLY INFORMED THEORETICAL DISCOURSE

COLLABORATION WITH URBAN DEVELOPERS, PLANNERS, POLITICIANS, GRASSROOTS, RESEARCHERS, ARTISTS ETC

Page 4: Helsinki 2012

URBANITY: THE POTENTIAL OF THE ‘URBAN’

A FUNDAMENTAL CURIOSITY IN THE POTENTIALS OF A DYNAMIC URBANITY

ARTICULATING AN EVERYDAY URBANITY WITH CONCRETE BODIES, ‘LIVED’ CULTURES AND STRUCTURES OF THE CITY

Page 5: Helsinki 2012

PERSONAL CONTEXT

HARBOUR CONTEXT

SUPERTANKER IN THE HARBOUR

Page 6: Helsinki 2012

PERSONAL CONTEXT

Page 7: Helsinki 2012
Page 8: Helsinki 2012
Page 9: Helsinki 2012
Page 10: Helsinki 2012
Page 11: Helsinki 2012
Page 12: Helsinki 2012
Page 13: Helsinki 2012
Page 14: Helsinki 2012
Page 15: Helsinki 2012

HARBOUR CONTEXT

Page 16: Helsinki 2012
Page 17: Helsinki 2012
Page 18: Helsinki 2012
Page 19: Helsinki 2012
Page 20: Helsinki 2012
Page 21: Helsinki 2012
Page 22: Helsinki 2012
Page 23: Helsinki 2012
Page 24: Helsinki 2012
Page 25: Helsinki 2012
Page 26: Helsinki 2012
Page 27: Helsinki 2012

WEST 8

EGERAAT

SOETERS

Page 28: Helsinki 2012
Page 29: Helsinki 2012
Page 30: Helsinki 2012
Page 31: Helsinki 2012
Page 32: Helsinki 2012
Page 33: Helsinki 2012
Page 34: Helsinki 2012

KRØYERS PLADS

Page 35: Helsinki 2012
Page 36: Helsinki 2012
Page 37: Helsinki 2012
Page 38: Helsinki 2012
Page 39: Helsinki 2012
Page 40: Helsinki 2012
Page 41: Helsinki 2012
Page 42: Helsinki 2012
Page 43: Helsinki 2012
Page 44: Helsinki 2012
Page 45: Helsinki 2012

KRØYERS PLADS: FROM A VAGUE TO A POLARISED SPACE

IMPOSSIBLE FOR DREAMS, INTERESTS  AND NEEDS TO UNFOLD 

BLACK AND WHITE (LACK OF) DIALOGUE

Page 46: Helsinki 2012
Page 47: Helsinki 2012
Page 48: Helsinki 2012
Page 49: Helsinki 2012
Page 50: Helsinki 2012
Page 51: Helsinki 2012

YELLOW ARROW:

VISIBLE IN PUBLIC SPACE AND INTERACTIVE

TOO GEEKY AND NON INCLUSIVE

Page 52: Helsinki 2012

SOUTH HARBOUR

Page 53: Helsinki 2012
Page 54: Helsinki 2012
Page 55: Helsinki 2012
Page 56: Helsinki 2012
Page 57: Helsinki 2012
Page 58: Helsinki 2012
Page 59: Helsinki 2012
Page 60: Helsinki 2012

VOICES OF THE SOUTH HARBOUR:

MAPPING

EMPOWERMENT

PUBLIC MEETING UPSIDE DOWN

Page 61: Helsinki 2012
Page 62: Helsinki 2012
Page 63: Helsinki 2012
Page 64: Helsinki 2012
Page 65: Helsinki 2012
Page 66: Helsinki 2012
Page 67: Helsinki 2012
Page 68: Helsinki 2012
Page 69: Helsinki 2012
Page 70: Helsinki 2012

YELLOW ARROW: SOUTH HARBOUR VOICES

CURATED AND MORE INCLUSIVE

PLAYFUL AND POLITICAL PROCESS

Page 71: Helsinki 2012

DREAM PATH

Page 72: Helsinki 2012
Page 73: Helsinki 2012
Page 74: Helsinki 2012
Page 75: Helsinki 2012
Page 76: Helsinki 2012
Page 77: Helsinki 2012
Page 78: Helsinki 2012
Page 79: Helsinki 2012
Page 80: Helsinki 2012
Page 81: Helsinki 2012
Page 82: Helsinki 2012
Page 83: Helsinki 2012
Page 84: Helsinki 2012
Page 85: Helsinki 2012
Page 86: Helsinki 2012
Page 87: Helsinki 2012

DREAM PATH: FROM DREAM TO PRODUCT

NUMEROUS TYPES OF INPUT - ENGAGED KIDS

PROCES WAS TOO LONG AND INVISIBLE (IN THE BEGINNING)

Page 88: Helsinki 2012

DO IT TOGETHER

Page 89: Helsinki 2012
Page 90: Helsinki 2012
Page 91: Helsinki 2012
Page 92: Helsinki 2012

DO IT TOGETHER:

DESIGNING AND BUILDING IN AND FOR PUBLIC SPACE

SPATIALISE THE DISCUSSION ABOUT SPACE

Page 93: Helsinki 2012

URBAN PROCES DESIGN

Page 94: Helsinki 2012
Page 95: Helsinki 2012
Page 96: Helsinki 2012
Page 97: Helsinki 2012

URBAN PROCESS DESIGN:

SENSING - REFLECTING - ACTING

MAPPING AND TAKING THE SPACE

Page 98: Helsinki 2012

CITYBEE

Page 99: Helsinki 2012
Page 100: Helsinki 2012
Page 101: Helsinki 2012
Page 102: Helsinki 2012
Page 103: Helsinki 2012
Page 104: Helsinki 2012
Page 105: Helsinki 2012
Page 106: Helsinki 2012

CITYBEE:

STORES IN AND ABOUT THE CITY

SPATIALIZING THE DISCUSSION ABOUT SPACE

DISCOVERING PATTERNS OF POSSIBILITIES

NEW NETWORKS AND INITIATIVES

Page 107: Helsinki 2012

THE BEST SENSOR

Page 108: Helsinki 2012

1 : 1 MAP

Page 109: Helsinki 2012

SIMPLE ORGANISATIONS

Page 110: Helsinki 2012

MOVING MAPS

Page 111: Helsinki 2012

SEEING NEW PATTERNS

Page 112: Helsinki 2012

NEW CONTEXTUALISED: IDEAS AND INITIATIVES

Page 113: Helsinki 2012

URBAN MAPPING:

1 : 1 MAPS AND SMALL VISIBLE INTERVENTIONS IN PUBLIC SPACE

CONSTRUCTIVE DIALOGUE

FROM VAGUE SPACES TO POROSITY (AND BACK)

Page 114: Helsinki 2012

POROSITYAT THE BASE OF THE CLIFF ITSELF, CAVES HAVE BEEN HEWN [...] AS POROUS AS THIS STONE IS THE ARCHITECTURE. BUILDING AND ACTION INTERPENETRATE IN THE COURTYARDS, ARCADES, AND STAIRWAYS. IN EVERYTHING THEY PRESERVE THE SCOPE TO BECOME A THEATRE OF NEW, UNFORESEEN THE STAMP OF DEFINITIVE IS AVOIDED. NO SITUATION APPEARS INTENDED FOREVER, NO FIGURE ASSERTS ITS “THUS AND NOT OTHERWISE”. THIS IS HOW ARCHITECTURE, THE MOST BINDING PART OF THE COMMUNAL RHYTHM, COMES INTO BEING HERE WALTHER BENJAMINMOST BINDING PART OF THE COMMUNAL RHYTHM, COMES INTO BEING HERE

Page 115: Helsinki 2012

ARCHITECTURE CAN ‘SPATIALISE’ THE DREAMS, DRIFTS, NEEDS AND INTERESTS THAT FLOWSTHROUGH THE CITY.

ARCHITECTURE CAN ACT AS A SPATIALISING MOMENT IN THE COLLECTIVE AND CONTINUOUSLY CHANGING OEUVRE, THE CITY

Page 116: Helsinki 2012