Electronic Supplementary Information A survey of diverse ...
HeLF Electronic Management of Assessment Survey Data 2013
-
Upload
barbara-newland -
Category
Education
-
view
618 -
download
4
description
Transcript of HeLF Electronic Management of Assessment Survey Data 2013
HeLFElectronic Management of
Assessment SurveyData 2013
Dr Barbara Newland, Brighton
Lindsay Martin, Edge Hill
Alice Bird, Liverpool John Moores
This presentation is a summary of the quantitative data from the Heads of eLearning Forum Electronic Management of Assessment survey undertaken in March/April 2013.
Further information on the qualitative results will be made available later.
Overview
The term eSubmission is used very widely to cover a range of activities so the following definitions were used:
Definitions
eSubmission electronic submission of an assignment
eMarking electronic marking (including offline marking eg in Word)
eFeedback eFeedback - electronic feedback (ie text, audio, video but not hard copy)
eReturn eReturn - electronic return of marks
To identify current practice with regard to Electronic Management of Assessment in UK HE
To gain a snapshot of the strategic overview identifying key issues relating to assessment regulations and academic attitudes
To enable a comparison with the past 2 years
Aim
A network of senior staff in institutions engaged in promoting, supporting and developing technology enhanced learning
Over 138 nominated Heads from UK Higher Education institutions
A regular programme of well attended events
Represents the interests of its members to various national bodies and agencies including the Higher Education Academy and JISCwww.helf.ac.uk
Heads of eLearning Forum (HeLF)
The survey was available to HeLF members who were asked to respond with regard to their knowledge of their own institution.
The survey was available in March/April 2013 and took about 10 minutes to complete
The questions were a mixture of closed multiple-choice and multiple selection as well as open response type
Participants were assured that all data collected in the survey would be held anonymously and securely
No personal data was asked for or retained unless the participant indicated a willingness to participate in the follow-up activity
The results are being analyzed using quantitative and qualitative methods
Methodology
52 responses from HeLF members
38% response rate
Results
Institution-wide policy
eSubmission eMarking eFeedback0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
YesNo
Closer to having an institution-wider policy than a year ago?
eSubmission eMarking eFeedback0
5
10
15
20
25
30
YesNoDon't know
Is the move to eFeedback leading to more standardisation in terms of the feedback provided?
University-wide
Department-wide
Neither
Which software does your institution recommend for eFeedback in text format?
Turnitin (stand-alone)Turnitin (integrated into VLE)VLEHome grownOther
Current practice
05
10152025303540
University-wideSome department-wideIndividual academics
Is there evidence of increased use of mobile devices?
eSubmission eMarking eFeedback0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Academic staffStudents
Have you experienced critical issues with the eSubmission, eMarking or eFeedback software over the past year?
YesNoDon't know
Does your institution have a fully integrated EMA approach?
YesNoUnder consideration
Does your EMA system cope with the following marking processes?
Anon
ymou
s m
arking
Double
mar
king
Exte
rnal e
xam
iner
s0
5
10
15
20
25
30
YesNoDon't know
How would you rate attitudes to eSubmission?
Positive Negative Neutral Don't know0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Academic staffAdministrative staffStudents
How would you rate attitudes to eFeedback?
Positive Negative Neutral Don't know0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Academic staffAdministrative staffStudents
How would you rate academic staff attitudes to eMarking?
PositiveNegativeNeutralDon't know
Dr Barbara Newland [email protected]
Lindsey [email protected]
Alice [email protected]
Contact details