Heating Values of Fuel

8/3/2019 Heating Values of Fuel

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/heating-values-of-fuel 1/19

Steam: its Generation and Use

Table of Contents Previous Chapter

[Pg 173]

THE DETERMINATION OF HEATING VALUES OF FUELS

The heating value of a fuel may be determined either by a calculation from a chemical

analysis or by burning a sample in a calorimeter.

In the former method the calculation should be based on an ultimate analysis, which

reduces the fuel to its elementary constituents of carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen,

sulphur, ash and moisture, to secure a reasonable degree of accuracy. A proximate

analysis, which determines only the percentage of moisture, fixed carbon, volatile matter

and ash, without determining the ultimate composition of the volatile matter, cannot be

used for computing the heat of combustion with the same degree of accuracy as an

ultimate analysis, but estimates may be based on the ultimate analysis that are fairly

correct.

An ultimate analysis requires the services of a competent chemist, and the methods to be

employed in such a determination will be found in any standard book on engineering

chemistry. An ultimate analysis, while resolving the fuel into its elementary constituents,

does not reveal how these may have been combined in the fuel. The manner of their

combination undoubtedly has a direct effect upon their calorific value, as fuels havingalmost identical ultimate analyses show a difference in heating value when tested in a

calorimeter. Such a difference, however, is slight, and very close approximations may be

computed from the ultimate analysis.

Ultimate analyses are given on both a moist and a dry fuel basis. Inasmuch as the latter is

the basis generally accepted for the comparison of data, it would appear that it is the best

basis on which to report such an analysis. When an analysis is given on a moist fuel basis it

may be readily converted to a dry basis by dividing the percentages of the various

constituents by one minus the percentage of moisture, reporting the moisture content

separately.

Moist Fuel Dry Fuel

C 83.95 84.45

H 4.23 4.25

O 3.02 3.04

N 1.27 1.28

S .91 .91

Ash 6.03 6.07–––––––––––

100.00

Moisture .59 .59–––––––––––

http://www.gutenberg.org/files/22657/22657-h/header.html


http://www.gutenberg.org/files/22657/22657-h/chapters/classification.html#end






100.00

CALCULATIONS FROM AN ULTIMATE ANALYSIS—The first formula for the calculation of heating

values from the composition of a fuel as determined from an ultimate analysis is due to

Dulong, and this formula, slightly modified, is the most commonly used to-day. Other

formulae have been proposed, some of which are more accurate for certain specific classes

of fuel, but all have their basis in Dulong’s formula, the accepted modified form of which is:

Heat units in B. t. u. per pound of dry fuel =

14,600 C + 62,000( H -

O––––

8 ) + 4000 S (18)

[Pg 174]

where C, H, O and S are the proportionate parts by weight of carbon, hydrogen, oxygen and

sulphur.

Assume a coal of the composition given. Substituting in this formula (18),

Heating value per pound of dry coal

= 14,600 × .8445 + 62,000 ( .0425 -.0304–––––––––

8) + 4000 × .0091 = 14,765 B. t. u.

This coal, by a calorimetric test, showed 14,843 B. t. u., and from a comparison the degreeof accuracy of the formula will be noted.

The investigation of Lord and Haas in this country, Mabler in France, and Bunte in

Germany, all show that Dulong’s formula gives results nearly identical with those obtained

from calorimetric tests and may be safely applied to all solid fuels except cannel coal,

lignite, turf and wood, provided the ultimate analysis is correct. This practically limits its

use to coal. The limiting features are the presence of hydrogen and carbon united in the

form of hydrocarbons. Such hydrocarbons are present in coals in small quantities, but they

have positive and negative heats of combination, and in coals these appear to offset each

other, certainly sufficiently to apply the formula to such fuels.

HIGH AND LOW HEAT VALUE OF FUELS—In any fuel containing hydrogen the calorific value as

found by the calorimeter is higher than that obtainable under most working conditions in

boiler practice by an amount equal to the latent heat of the volatilization of water. This

heat would reappear when the vapor was condensed, though in ordinary practice the

vapor passes away uncondensed. This fact gives rise to a distinction in heat values into the

so-called “higher” and “lower” calorific values. The higher value, i. e., the one determined

by the calorimeter, is the only scientific unit, is the value which should be used in boiler

testing work, and is the one recommended by the American Society of MechanicalEngineers.

http://www.gutenberg.org/files/22657/22657-h/chapters/value.html#equn_18






There is no absolute measure of the lower heat of combustion, and in view of the wide

difference in opinion among physicists as to the deductions to be made from the higher or

absolute unit in this determination, the lower value must be considered an artificial unit.

The lower value entails the use of an ultimate analysis and involves assumptions that

would make the employment of such a unit impracticable for commercial work. The use of

the low value may also lead to error and is in no way to be recommended for boiler

practice.

An example of its illogical use may be shown by the consideration of a boiler operated in

connection with a special economizer where the vapor produced by hydrogen is partially

condensed by the economizer. If the low value were used in computing the boiler

efficiency, it is obvious that the total efficiency of the combined boiler and economizer

must be in error through crediting the combination with the heat imparted in condensing

the vapor and not charging such heat to the heat value of the coal.

HEATING VALUE OF GASEOUS FUELS—The method of computing calorific values from an

ultimate analysis is particularly adapted to solid fuels, with the exceptions already noted.The heating value of gaseous fuels may be calculated by Dulong’s formula provided

another term is added to provide for any carbon monoxide present. Such a method,

however, involves the separating of the constituent gases into their elementary gases,

which is oftentimes difficult and liable to simple arithmetical error. As the combustible

portion of gaseous fuels is ordinarily composed of hydrogen, carbon [Pg 175]monoxide and

certain hydrocarbons, a determination of the calorific value is much more readily obtained

by a separation into their constituent gases and a computation of the calorific value from a

table of such values of the constituents. Table 37 gives the calorific value of the more

common combustible gases, together with the theoretical amount of air required for their

combustion.

TABLE 37

WEIGHT AND CALORIFIC VALUE OF VARIOUS GASES

AT 32 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AND ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE

WITH THEORETICAL AMOUNT OF AIR REQUIRED FOR COMBUSTION

Gas Symbol

Cubic Feet of

Gas perPound

B. t. u.

perPound

B. t. u. per

CubicFoot

Cubic Feet of

Air

Requiredper Pound of

Gas

Cubic Feet of

Air Required

Per CubicFoot

of Gas

Hydrogen H 177.90 62000 349 428.25 2.41

Carbon

MonoxideCO 2.81 4450 347 30.60 2.39

Methane CH4 22.37 23550 1053 214.00 9.57

Acetylene C2H2 13.79 21465 1556 164.87 11.93

Olefiant Gas C2H4 12.80 21440 1675 183.60 14.33

Ethane C2H6 11.94 22230 1862 199.88 16.74

http://www.gutenberg.org/files/22657/22657-h/chapters/value.html#tabl_37






In applying this table, as gas analyses may be reported either by weight or volume, there is

given in Table 33[36] a method of changing from volumetric analysis to analysis by weight.

Examples:

1st. Assume a blast furnace gas, the analysis of which in percentages by weight is, oxygen =

2.7, carbon monoxide = 19.5, carbon dioxide = 18.7, nitrogen = 59.1. Here the only

combustible gas is the carbon monoxide, and the heat value will be,

0.195 × 4450 = 867.75 B. t. u. per pound.

The net volume of air required to burn one pound of this gas will be,

0.195 × 30.6 = 5.967 cubic feet.

2nd. Assume a natural gas, the analysis of which in percentages by volume is oxygen =

0.40, carbon monoxide = 0.95, carbon dioxide = 0.34, olefiant gas (C2H4) = 0.66, ethane

(C2H6) = 3.55, marsh gas (CH4) = 72.15 and hydrogen = 21.95. All but the oxygen and thecarbon dioxide are combustibles, and the heat per cubic foot will be,

From CO = 0.0095 × 347 = 3.30

C2H4 = 0.0066 × 1675 = 11.05

C2H6 = 0.0355 × 1862 = 66.10

CH4 = 0.7215 × 1050 = 757.58

H = 0.2195 × 349 = 76.61–––––––––––

B. t. u. per cubic foot = 914.64

[Pg 176]

The net air required for combustion of one cubic foot of the gas will be,

CO = 0.0095 × 2.39 = 0.02

C2H4 = 0.0066 × 14.33 = 0.09

C2H6 = 0.0355 × 16.74 = 0.59

CH4 = 0.7215 × 9.57 = 6.90

H = 0.2195 × 2.41 = 0.53–––––––

Total net air per cubic foot = 8.13

PROXIMATE ANALYSIS—The proximate analysis of a fuel gives its proportions by weight of

fixed carbon, volatile combustible matter, moisture and ash. A method of making such an

analysis which has been found to give eminently satisfactory results is described below.

From the coal sample obtained on the boiler trial, an average sample of approximately 40

grams is broken up and weighed. A good means of reducing such a sample is passing it

through an ordinary coffee mill. This sample should be placed in a double-walled air bath,

which should be kept at an approximately constant temperature of 105 degreescentigrade, the sample being weighed at intervals until a minimum is reached. The

percentage of moisture can be calculated from the loss in such a drying.




http://www.gutenberg.org/files/22657/22657-h/chapters/fluegas.html#tabl_33









For the determination of the remainder of the analysis, and the heating value of the fuel, a

portion of this dried sample should be thoroughly pulverized, and if it is to be kept, should

be placed in an air-tight receptacle. One gram of the pulverized sample should be weighed

into a porcelain crucible equipped with a well fitting lid. This crucible should be supported

on a platinum triangle and heated for seven minutes over the full flame of a Bunsen

burner. At the end of such time the sample should be placed in a desiccator containing

calcium chloride, and when cooled should be weighed. From the loss the percentage of

volatile combustible matter may be readily calculated.

The same sample from which the volatile matter has been driven should be used in the

determination of the percentage of ash. This percentage is obtained by burning the fixed

carbon over a Bunsen burner or in a muffle furnace. The burning should be kept up until a

constant weight is secured, and it may be assisted by stirring with a platinum rod. The

weight of the residue determines the percentage of ash, and the percentage of fixed carbon

is easily calculated from the loss during the determination of ash after the volatile matter

has been driven off.

Proximate analyses may be made and reported on a moist or dry basis. The dry basis is

that ordinarily accepted, and this is the basis adopted throughout this book. The method of

converting from a moist to a dry basis is the same as described in the case of an ultimate

analysis. A proximate analysis is easily made, gives information as to the general

characteristics of a fuel and of its relative heating value.

Table 38 gives the proximate analysis and calorific value of a number of representative

coals found in the United States. [Pg 177]

TABLE 38

APPROXIMATE COMPOSITION AND CALORIFIC VALUE OF CERTAIN TYPICAL AMERICAN COALS

State CountyField, Bed

or VeinMine Size

Proximate Analysis (Dry Coal) B. t. u.

Per

Pound

Dry

Coal

AuthorityMoisture

Volatile

Matter

Fixed

Carbon Ash

ANTHRACITES

Pa. Carbon Lehigh Beaver Meadow 1.50 2.41 90.30 7.29 Gale

Pa. Dauphin Schuylkill Buckwheat 2.15 12.88 78.23 8.89 13137 Whitham

Pa. Lackawanna Wyoming Belleview No. 2 Buck. 8.29 7.81 77.19 15.00 12341 Sadtler

Pa. Lackawanna Wyoming Johnson Culm. 13.90 11.16 65.96 22.88 10591 B. & W. Co.

Pa. Luzerne Wyoming Pittston No. 2 Buck. 3.66 4.40 78.96 16.64 12865 B. & W. Co.

Pa. Luzerne Wyoming Mammoth Large 4.00 3.44 90.59 5.97 13720 Carpenter

Pa. Luzerne Wyoming Exeter Rice 0.25 8.18 79.61 12.21 12400 B. & W. Co.

Pa. Northumberland Schuylkill Treverton 0.84 6.73 86.39 6.88 Isherwood

Pa. Schuylkill Schuylkill Buck Mountain 3.17 92.41 4.42 14220 Carpenter

Pa. Schuylkill York Farm Buckwheat 0.81 5.51 75.90 18.59 11430

Pa. Victoria Buckwheat 4.30 0.55 86.73 12.72 12642 B. & W. Co.

Pa. Carbon LehighLehigh & Wilkes

C. Co.Buck. & Pea 1.57 6.27 66.53 27.20 12848 B. & W. Co.

Pa. Carbon Lehigh Buckwheat 5.00 81.00 14.00 11800 Carpenter






Pa. Lackawanna Del. & Hud. Co. No. 1 Buck. 6.20 11.60 12100 Denton

SEMI-ANTHRACITES

Pa. Lycoming Loyalsock 1.30 8.72 84.44 6.84

Pa. Sullivan Lopez 5.48 7.53 81.00 11.47 13547 B. & W. Co.

Pa. Sullivan Bernice 1.29 8.21 84.43 7.36

SEMI-BITUMINOUS

Md. AlleghanyBig Vein,

George's Crk. 3.50 21.33 72.47 6.20 14682 B. & W. Co.

Md. Alleghany George's Creek 3.63 16.27 76.93 6.80 14695 B. & W. Co.

Md. Alleghany George's Creek 2.28 19.43 77.44 6.13 14793 B. & W. Co.

Md. Alleghany George's Creek Ocean No. 7 Mine run 1.13 14451 B. & W. Co.

Md. Alleghany Cumberland 1.50 17.26 76.65 6.09 14700

Md. Garrett Washington No.

3Mine run 2.33 14.38 74.93 10.49 14033 U. S. Geo. S.[37]

Pa. Bradford Long Valley 1.55 20.33 68.38 11.29 12965

Pa. Tioga Antrim 2.19 18.43 71.87 9.70 13500

Pa. Cambria "B" or MillerSoriman Shaft C.

Co. 3.40 20.70 71.84 7.46 14484 N. Y. Ed. Co.

Pa. Cambria "B" or Miller Henrietta 1.23 18.37 75.28 6.45 14770 So. Eng. Co.

Pa. Cambria "B" or Miller Penker 3.64 21.34 70.48 8.18 14401 B. & W. Co.

Pa. Cambria "B" or Miller Lancashire 4.38 21.20 70.27 8.53 14453 B. & W. Co.

Pa. CambriaLower

Kittanning

Penn. C. & C. Co.

No. 3Mine run 3.51 17.43 75.69 6.88 14279 U. S. Geo. S.

Pa. CambriaUpper

KittanningValley Mine run 3.40 14.89 75.03 10.08 14152 B. & W. Co.

Pa. ClearfieldLower

KittanningEureka Mine run 5.90 16.71 77.22 6.07 14843 U. S. Geo. S.

Pa. Clearfield Ghem Mine run 3.43 17.53 69.67 12.80 13744 B. & W. Co.Pa. Clearfield Osceola 1.24 25.43 68.56 6.01 13589 B. & W. Co.

Pa. Clearfield Reynoldsville 2.91 21.55 69.03 9.42 14685 B. & W. Co.

Pa. ClearfieldAtlantic-

ClearfieldMine run 1.55 23.36 71.15 5.94 13963 Whitham

Pa. Huntington Barnet & Fulton Carbon Mine run 4.50 18.34 73.06 8.60 13770 B. & W. Co.

Pa. Huntington Rock Hill Mine run 5.91 17.58 73.44 8.99 14105 B. & W. Co.

Pa. Somerset Lower

KittanningKimmelton Mine run 3.09 17.84 70.47 11.69 13424 U. S. Geo. S.

Pa. Somerset "C" Prime Vein Jenner Mine run 9.37 16.47 75.76 7.77 14507 P. R. R.

W. Va. Fayette New River Rush Run Mine run 2.14 22.87 71.56 5.57 14959 U. S. Geo. S.[Pg178]

W. Va. Fayette New River Loup Creek 0.55 19.36 78.48 2.16 14975 Hill

W. Va. Fayette New River Slack 6.66 20.94 73.16 5.90 14412 B. & W. Co.

W. Va. Fayette New River Mine run 2.16 17.82 75.66 6.52 14786 B. & W. Co.

W. Va. Fayette New River Rush Run Mine run 0.94 22.16 75.85 1.99 15007 B. & W. Co.

W. Va. McDowellPocahontas No.

3Zenith Mine run 4.85 17.14 76.54 6.32 14480 U. S. Geo. S.

W. Va. McDowell Tug River Big Sandy Mine run 1.58 18.55 76.44 4.91 15170 U. S. Geo. S.

W. Va. Mercer Pocahontas Mora Lump 1.74 18.55 75.15 6.30 15015 U. S. Geo. S.

W. Va. Mineral Elk Garden 2.10 15.70 75.40 8.90 14195 B. & W. Co.

W. Va. McDowell Pocahontas Flat Top Mine run 0.52 24.02 74.59 1.39 14490 B. & W. Co.

W. Va. McDowell Pocahontas Flat Top Slack 3.24 15.33 77.60 7.07 14653 B. & W. Co.

W. Va. McDowell Pocahontas Flat Top Lump 3.63 16.03 78.04 5.93 14956 B. & W. Co.

http://www.gutenberg.org/files/22657/22657-h/chapters/value.html#footnote_37







or VeinMine Size


Per

Pound

Dry

Coal

AuthorityMoisture

Volatile

Matter

Fixed

Carbon Ash

BITUMINOUS

Ala. Bibb Cahaba Hill Creek Mine run 6.19 28.58 55.60 15.82 12576 B. & W. Co.

Ala. Jefferson Pratt Pratt No. 13 4.29 25.78 67.68 6.54 14482 B. & W. Co.

Ala. Jefferson Pratt Warner Mine run 2.51 27.80 61.50 10.70 13628 U. S. Geo. S.

Ala. Jefferson Coalburg Mine run 0.94 31.34 65.65 3.01 14513 B. & W. Co.

Ala. Walker Horse Creek Ivy C. & I. Co. No.

8Nut 2.56 31.82 53.89 14.29 12937 U. S. Geo. S.

Ala. Walker JaggerGalloway C. Co.

No. 5Mine run 4.83 34.65 51.12 14.03 12976 U. S. Geo. S.

Ark. Franklin Denning Western No. 4 Nut 2.22 12.83 75.35 11.82 U. S. Geo. S.

Ark. Sebastian Jenny Lind Mine No. 12 Lump 1.07 17.04 74.45 8.51 14252 U. S. Geo. S.

Ark. Sebastian Huntington Cherokee Mine run 0.97 19.87 70.30 9.83 14159 U. S. Geo. S.

Col. Boulder South Platte Lafayette Mine run 19.48 38.80 49.00 12.20 11939 B. & W. Co.

Col. Boulder Laramie Simson Mine run 19.78 44.69 48.62 6.69 12577 U. S. Geo. S.

Col. Fremont Canon City ChandlerNut and

Slack 9.37 38.10 51.75 10.15 11850 B. & W. Co.

Col. Las Animas Trinidad Hastings Nut 2.15 31.07 53.40 15.53 12547 B. & W. Co.

Col. Las Animas Trinidad Moreley Slack 1.88 28.47 55.58 15.95 12703 B. & W. Co.

Col. Routt Yampa Oak Creek 6.67 42.91 55.64 1.45 Hill

Ill. Christian Pana Penwell Col. Lump 8.05 43.67 49.97 6.36 10900 Jones

Ill. Franklin No. 6 Benton Egg 8.31 34.52 54.05 11.43 11727 U. S. Geo. S.

Ill. Franklin Big Muddy Zeigler ¾ inch 13.28 31.97 57.37 10.66 12857 U. S. Geo. S.

Ill. Jackson Big Muddy 4.85 31.55 62.19 6.26 11466 Breckenridge

Ill. La Salle Streator 8.40 41.76 51.42 6.82 11727 Breckenridge

Ill. La Salle Streator Marseilles Mine run 12.98 43.73 49.13 7.14 10899 B. & W. Co.

Ill. Macoupin Nilwood Mine No. 2 Screenings 13.34 34.75 44.55 20.70 10781 B. & W. Co.

Ill. Macoupin Mt. Olive Mine No. 2 Mine run 13.54 41.28 46.30 12.42 10807 U. S. Geo. S.

Ill. Madison Belleville Donk Bros. Lump 13.47 38.69 48.07 13.24 12427 U. S. Geo. S.

Ill. Madison Glen Carbon Mine run 9.78 38.18 51.52 10.30 11672 Bryan

Ill. Marion Odin Lump 6.20 42.91 49.06 8.03 11880 Breckenridge

Ill. Mercer Gilchrist Screenings 8.50 36.17 41.64 22.19 10497 Breckenridge

Ill. Montgomery Pana or No. 5 Coffeen Mine run 11.93 34.05 49.85 16.10 10303 U. S. Geo. S.

Ill. Peoria No. 5 Empire 17.64 31.91 46.17 21.92 10705 B. & W. Co.

Ill. Perry Du Quoin Number 1 Screenings 9.81 33.67 48.36 17.97 11229 B. & W. Co.

Ill. Perry Du Quoin Willis Mine run 7.22 33.06 53.97 12.97 11352U. S. Geo. S.[Pg

179]

Ill. Sangamon Pawnee Slack 4.81 41.53 39.62 18.85 10220 Jones

Ill. St. Glair Standard Nigger Hollow Mine run 14.39 32.90 44.84 22.26 11059 B. & W. Co.

Ill. St. Clair Standard Maryville Mine run 15.71 38.10 41.10 20.80 10999 B. & W. Co.

Ill. Williamson Big Muddy Daws Mine run 8.17 34.33 52.50 13.17 12643 U. S. Geo. S.

Ill. WilliamsonCarterville or

No. 7Carterville 4.66 35.65 56.86 7.49 12286 Univ. of Ill.

Ill. WilliamsonCarterville or

No. 7Burr

Nut, Pea and

Slack 11.91 33.70 55.90 10.40 12932 B. & W. Co.

Ind. Brazil Brazil Gartside Block 2.83 40.03 51.97 8.00 13375 Stillman

Ind. Clay Louise Block 0.83 39.70 52.28 8.02 13248 Jones



Ind. Green Island City Mine run 6.17 35.42 53.55 11.03 11916 Dearborn

Ind. Knox Vein No. 5 Tecumseh Mine run 10.73 35.75 54.46 9.79 12911 B. & W. Co.

Ind. Parke Vein No. 6 Parke Coal Co. Lump 10.72 44.02 46.33 9.65 11767 U. S. Geo. S.

Ind. Sullivan Sullivan No. 6 Mildred Washed 16.59 42.17 48.44 9.59 13377 U. S. Geo. S.

Ind. Vigo Number 6 Fontanet Mine run 2.28 34.95 50.50 14.55 11920 Dearborn


or Vein Mine Size


Per

PoundDry

Coal

AuthorityMoisture VolatileMatter

FixedCarbon

Ash

Ind. Vigo Number 7 Red Bird Mine run 11.62 41.17 46.76 12.07 12740 U. S. Geo. S.

Iowa Appanoose Mystic Mine No. 3 Lump 13.48 39.40 43.09 17.51 11678 U. S. Geo. S.

Iowa Lucas Lucas Inland No. 1 Mine run 16.01 37.82 46.24 15.94 11963 U. S. Geo. S.

Iowa Marion Big Vein Liberty No. 5 Mine run 14.88 41.53 39.63 18.84 11443 U. S. Geo. S.

Iowa Polk Third Seam Altoona No. 4 Lump 12.44 41.27 40.86 17.87 11671 U. S. Geo. S.

Iowa Wapello Wapello Lump 8.69 36.23 43.68 20.09 11443 U. S. Geo. S.

Kan. Cherokee Weir PittsburghSouthwestern

Dev. Co.Lump 4.31 33.88 53.67 12.45 13144 U. S. Geo. S.

Kan. Cherokee Cherokee Screenings 6.16 35.56 46.90 17.54 10175 Jones

Kan. Cherokee Cherokee Lump 1.81 34.77 52.77 12.46 12557 Jones

Kan. Linn Boicourt Lump 4.74 36.59 47.07 16.34 10392 Jones

Ky. Bell Straight Creek Str. Ck. C. & C.

Co.Mine run 2.89 36.67 57.24 6.09 14362 U. S. Geo. S.

Ky. Hopkins Bed No. 9 Earlington Lump 6.89 40.30 55.16 4.54 13381 St. Col. Ky.

Ky. Hopkins Bed No. 9 Barnsley Mine run 7.92 40.53 48.70 10.77 13036 U. S. Geo. S.

Ky. Hopkins Vein No. 14 NeboPea and

Slack 8.02 31.91 54.02 14.07 12448 B. & W. Co.

Ky. Johnson Vein No. 1 Miller's Creek Mine run 5.12 38.46 58.63 2.91 13743 U. S. Geo. S.

Ky. Mulenburg Bed No. 9 PiercePea and

Slack 9.22 33.94 52.18 13.88 12229 B. & W. Co.

Ky. Pulaski Greensburg 2.80 26.54 63.58 9.88 14095 N. Y. Ed. Co.

Ky. Webster Bed No. 9Pea and

Slack 7.30 31.08 60.72 8.20 13600 B. & W. Co.

Ky. Whitley JellicoNut and

Slack 3.82 31.82 58.78 9.40 13175 B. & W. Co.

Mo. Adair Danforth Mine run 9.00 30.55 46.26 23.19 9889 B. & W. Co.

Mo. Bates Rich Hill New Home Mine run 7.28 37.62 43.83 18.55 12109 U. S. Geo. S.

Mo. Clay Lexington Mo. City Coal Co. 12.45 39.39 48.47 12.14 12875 Univ. of Mo.

Mo. Lafayette Waverly Buckthorn 8.58 41.78 45.99 12.23 12735 Univ. of Mo.

Mo. Lafayette Waverly Higbee 10.84 31.72 55.29 12.99 12500 Univ. of Mo.

Mo. Linn Bevier Marceline 9.45 36.72 52.20 11.08 13180 Univ. of Mo.

Mo. Macon BevierNorthwest Coal

Co.13.09 37.83 42.95 19.22 11500 U. S. Geo. S.

Mo. Morgan Morgan Co.Morgan Co. Coal


Mo. Putnam Mendotta Mendotta No. 8 20.78 39.36 50.00 10.64 12602 U. S. Geo. S.

N.Mex. McKinley Gallup GibsonPea and

Slack 12.17 36.31 51.17 12.52 12126 B. & W. Co.

Ohio Athens Hocking Valley Sunday Creek Slack 12.16 34.64 53.10 12.26 12214

[Pg 180] Ohio Belmont Pittsburgh No. 8 Neff Coal Co. Mine run 5.31 38.78 52.22 9.00 12843 U. S. Geo. S.

Ohio ColumbianaMiddle

KittanningPalestine 2.15 37.57 51.80 10.63 13370 Lord & Haas



Ohio CoshoctonMiddle

KittanningMorgan Run Mine run 41.76 45.24 13.00 13239 B. & W. Co.

Ohio Guernsey Vein No. 7 Little Kate 6.19 33.02 59.96 7.02 13634 B. & W. Co.

Ohio Hocking Hocking Valley Lump 6.45 39.12 50.08 10.80 12700 Lord & Haas

Ohio Hocking Hocking Valley 2.60 40.80 47.60 11.60 12175 Jones

Ohio Jackson BrookvilleSuperior Coal


Ohio Jackson LowerKittanning

Superior CoalCo.

Mine run 8.99 41.43 50.06 8.51 13113 U. S. Geo. S.

Ohio Jackson Quakertown Wellston 3.38 35.26 54.18 7.56 12506 Hill

Ohio JeffersonPittsburgh or

No. 8Crow Hollow ¾ inch 4.04 40.08 52.27 9.65 13374 U. S. Geo. S.

Ohio JeffersonPittsburgh or

No. 8Rush Run No. 1 ¾ inch 4.74 36.08 54.81 9.11 13532 U. S. Geo. S.

Ohio Perry Hocking Congo 6 41 38.33 46.71 14.96 12284 B. & W. Co.

Ohio Stark Massillon Slack 6.67 40.02 46.46 13.52 11860 B. & W. Co.

Ohio VintonBrookville or No.

4Clarion

Nut and

Slack 2.47 42.38 50.39 6.23 13421 U. S. Geo. S.


or VeinMine Size

Proximate Analysis (Dry Coal) B. t. u.Per

Pound

Dry

Coal

AuthorityMoisture

Volatile

Matter

Fixed

Carbon Ash

Okla. Choctaw McAlester Edwards No. 1 Mine run 4.79 39.18 49.97 10.85 13005 U. S. Geo. S.

Okla. Choctaw McAlester Adamson Slack 4.72 28.54 58.17 13.29 12105 B. & W. Co.

Okla. Creek HenriettaLump and

Slack 7.65 36.77 50.14 13.09 12834 U. S. Geo. S.

Pa. AlleghenyPittsburgh 3rd

PoolSlack 1.77 32.06 57.11 10.83 13205 Carpenter

Pa. Allegheny Monongahela Turtle Creek 1.75 36.85 53.94 9.21 13480 Lord & Haas

Pa. Allegheny Pittsburgh Bertha ¾ inch 2.61 35.86 57.81 6.33 13997 U. S. Geo. S.

Pa. Cambria Beach Creek Slack 3.01 32.87 55.86 11.27 13755 B. & W. Co.

Pa. Cambria Miller Lincoln Mine run 5.39 30.83 61.05 8.12 13600 B. & W. Co.

Pa. Clarion Lower Freeport 0.54 35.93 57.66 6.41 13547

Pa. Fayette Connellsville Slack 1.85 28.73 63.22 7.95 13775 Whitham

Pa. Greene Youghiogheny Lump 1.25 32.60 54.70 12.70 13100 B. & W. Co.

Pa. Greene Westmoreland Screenings 11.12 31.67 55.61 12.72 13100 P. R. R.

Pa. Indiana Iselin Mine run 2.70 29.33 63.56 7.11 14220 B. & W. Co.

Pa. Jefferson Punxsutawney Mine run 3.38 29.33 64.93 5.73 14781 B. & W. Co.

Pa. LawrenceMiddle

Kittanning0.70 37.06 56.24 6.70 13840 Lord & Haas

Pa. Mercer Taylor 4.18 32.19 55.55 12.26 12820 B. & W. Co.

Pa. Washington Pittsburgh Ellsworth 2.46 35.35 58.46 6.19 14013 U. S. Geo. S.

Pa. Washington Youghiogheny Anderson ¾ inch 1.00 39.29 54.80 5.91 13729 Jones

Pa. Westmoreland Pittsburgh Scott Haven Lump 4.06 32.91 59.78 7.31 13934 B. & W. Co.

Tenn. Campbell Jellico 1.80 37.76 62.12 1.12 13846 U. S. Navy

Tenn. Claiborne Mingo 4.40 34.31 59.22 6.47 U. S. Geo. S.

Tenn. Marion Etna 3.16 32.98 56.59 10.43

Tenn. Morgan Brushy Mt. 1.77 33.46 54.73 11.87 13824 B. & W. Co.

Tenn. Scott Glen Mary No. 4 Glen Mary 1.53 40.80 56.78 2.42 14625 Ky. State Col.

Tex. Maverick Eagle Pass 5.42 33.73 44.89 21.38 10945 B. & W. Co.

Tex. Paolo Pinto Thurber Mine run 1.90 36.01 49.09 14.90 12760 B. & W. Co.



Tex. Paolo Pinto Strawn Mine run 4.19 35.40 52.98 11.62 13202 B. & W. Co.

Va. Henrico Gayton 0.82 17.14 74.92 7.94 14363 B. & W. Co.

Va. Lee Darby Darby 1½ inch 4.35 38.46 56.91 4.63 13939U. S. Geo. S.[Pg

181]

Va. Lee McConnel Wilson Mine run 3.35 36.35 57.88 5.77 13931 U. S. Geo. S.

Va. Wise Upper Banner Coburn 3½ inch 3.05 32.65 62.73 4.62 14470 U. S. Geo. S.

Va. Rockingham Clover Hill 31.77 57.98 10.25 13103Va. Russel Clinchfield 2.00 35.72 56.12 8.16 14200

Va. Monongahela Bernmont 32.00 59.90 8.10 13424 Carpenter

W. Va. Harrison Pittsburgh Ocean Mine run 2.47 39.35 52.78 7.87 14202 U. S. Geo. S.

W. Va. Harrison GirardNut, Pea and

Slack 36.66 57.49 5.85 14548 B. & W. Co.

W. Va. Kanawha Winifrede Winifrede 1.05 32.74 64.38 2.88 14111 Hill

W. Va. Kanawha Keystone Keystone Mine run 2.21 33.29 58.61 8.10 14202 U. S. Geo. S.

W. Va. Logan Island Creek Nut and

Slack 1.12 38.61 55.91 5.48 14273 Hill

W. Va. Marion Fairmont Kingmont 1.90 35.31 57.34 7.35 14198 U. S. Geo. S.W. Va. Mingo Thacker Maritime 0.68 31.89 63.48 4.63 14126 Hill

W. Va. Mingo Glen Alum Glen Alum Mine run 3.02 33.81 59.45 6.74 14414 U. S. Geo. S.

W. Va. Preston Bakerstown 4.14 29.09 63.50 7.41 14546 U. S. Geo. S.

W. Va. Putnam Pittsburgh Black Betsy Bug dust 7.41 32.84 53.96 13.20 12568 B. & W. Co.

W. Va. Randolph Upper Freeport CoaltonLump and

Nut 2.11 29.57 59.93 10.50 13854 U. S. Geo. S.


or VeinMine Size


Per

Pound

Dry

Coal

AuthorityMoisture

Volatile

Matter

Fixed

Carbon Ash

LIGNITES AND LIGNITIC COALS

Col. Boulder Rex 16.05 42.12 47.97 9.91 10678 B. & W. Co.

Col. El Paso Curtis 23.25 42.11 49.38 8.51 11090 B. & W. Co.

Col. El Paso Pike View 23.77 48.70 41.47 9.83 10629 B. & W. Co.

Col. Gunnison South Platte Mt. Carbon 20.38 46.38 47.50 6.12

Col. Las Animas Acme 16.74 47.90 44.60 7.50 Col. Sc. of M.

Col. Lehigh 18.30 45.29 44.67 10.04

N.

Dak.McLean Eckland Mine run 29.65 45.56 47.05 7.39 10553 Lord

N.Dak.

McLean Wilton Lump 35.96 49.84 38.05 12.11 11036 U. S. Geo. S.

N.

Dak.McLean Casino 29.65 46.56 38.70 14.74 Lord

N.

Dak.Stark Lehigh Lehigh Mine run 35.84 43.84 39.59 16.57 10121 U. S. Geo. S.

N.

Dak.William Williston Mine run 41.76 39.37 48.09 12.54 10121 B. & W. Co.

N.

Dak.William Williston Mine run 42.74 40.83 47.79 11.38 10271 B. & W. Co.

Tex. Bastrop Bastrop Glenham 32.77 42.76 36.88 20.36 8958 B. & W. Co.

Tex. Houston Crockett 23.27 40.95 38.37 20.68 10886 U. S. Geo. S.

Tex. HoustonHouston C. & C.

Co.31.48 46.93 34.40 18.87 10176 B. & W. Co.

Tex. Milam Rockdale Worley 32.48 43.04 41.14 15.82 10021 B. & W. Co.



Tex. Robertson Calvert Coaling No. 1 32.01 43.70 43.08 13.22 10753 B. & W. Co.

Tex. Wood Hoyt Consumer's Lig.

Co.33.98 46.97 41.40 11.63 10600 U. S. Geo. S.

Tex. Wood Hoyt 30.25 43.27 41.46 15.27 10597

Wash. King Black Diamond 3.71 48.72 46.56 4.72 Gale

Wyo. Carbon Hanna Mine run 6.44 51.32 43.00 5.68 11607 B. & W. Co.

Wyo. Crook Black Hills Stilwell Coal Co. 19.08 45.21 46.42 8.37 12641 U. S. Geo. S.

Wyo. Sheridan Sheridan Monarch 21.18 51.87 40.43 7.70 12316 U. S. Geo. S.

Wyo. Sweetwater Rock Spring Screenings 7.70 38.57 56.99 4.44 12534 B. & W. Co.

Wyo. Uinta Adaville Lazeart 19.15 45.50 48.11 6.39 9868

U. S. Geo. S.

[Pg

182] [Pl

182]

[Pg 183]

TABLE 39

SHOWING RELATION BETWEEN PROXIMATE AND ULTIMATE ANALYSES OF COAL

State Field or Bed Mine

Proximate

AnalysisUltimate Analysis

Common in

Proximate

& Ultimate

Analysis

Volatile

Matter

Fixed

CarbonCarbon Hydrogen Oxygen Nitrogen Sulphur Ash Moisture

Ala. Horse Creek Icy Coal & Iron Co., No.

831.81 53.90 72.02 4.78 6.45 1.66 .80 14.29 2.56

Ark. Huntington Central C. & C. Co., No. 3 18.99 67.71 76.37 3.90 3.71 1.49 1.23 13.30 1.99

Ill. Pana or No. 5 Clover Leaf, No. 1 37.22 45.64 63.04 4.49 10.04 1.28 4.01 17.14 13.19

Ind. No. 5, Warrick Co. Electric 41.85 44.45 68.08 4.78 7.56 1.35 4.53 13.70 9.11

Ky. No. 11, Hopkins Co. St. Bernard, No. 11 41.10 49.60 72.22 5.06 8.44 1.33 3.65 9.30 7.76

Pa."B" or Lower

KittanningEureka, No. 31 16.71 77.22 84.45 4.25 3.04 1.28 .91 6.07 .56

Pa. Indiana Co. 29.55 62.64 79.86 5.02 4.27 1.86 1.18 7.81 2.90

W.

Va.Fire Creek Rush Run 22.87 71.56 83.71 4.64 3.67 1.70 .71 5.57 2.14

Table 39 gives for comparison the ultimate and proximate analyses of certain of the coals

with which tests were made in the coal testing plant of the United States Geological Survey

at the Louisiana Purchase Exposition at St. Louis.

The heating value of a fuel cannot be directly computed from a proximate analysis, due to

the fact that the volatile content varies widely in different fuels in composition and in

heating value.

Some methods have been advanced for estimating the calorific value of coals from the

proximate analysis. William Kent [38] deducted from Mahler’s tests of European coals the

approximate heating value dependent upon the content of fixed carbon in the combustible.

The relation as deduced by Kent between the heat and value per pound of combustible andthe per cent of fixed carbon referred to combustible is represented graphically by Fig. 23.

Goutal gives another method of determining the heat value from a proximate analysis, in

which the carbon is given a fixed value and the heating value of the volatile matter is

http://www.gutenberg.org/files/22657/22657-h/plates/plate182.html















considered as a function of its percentage referred to combustible. Goutal’s method checks

closely with Kent’s determinations.

All the formulae, however, for computing the calorific value of coals from a proximate

analysis are ordinarily limited to certain classes of fuels. Mr. Kent, for instance, states that

his deductions are correct within a close limit for fuels containing more than 60 per cent of

fixed carbon in the combustible, while for those containing a lower percentage, the error

may be as great as 4 per cent, either high or low.

While the use of such computations will serve where approximate results only are

required, that they are approximate should be thoroughly understood.

CALORIMETRY—An ultimate or a proximate analysis of a fuel is useful in [Pg 184]determining

its general characteristics, and as described on page 183, may be used in the calculation of

the approximate heating value. Where the efficiency of a boiler is to be computed,

however, this heating value should in all instances be determined accurately by means of a

fuel calorimeter.

FIG. 23. GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF RELATION BETWEEN

HEAT V ALUE PER POUND OF COMBUSTIBLE AND

FIXED C ARBON IN COMBUSTIBLE AS DEDUCED BY WM. K ENT.

In such an apparatus the fuel is completely burned and the heat generated by such

combustion is absorbed by water, the amount of heat being calculated from the elevation

in the temperature of the water. A calorimeter which has been accepted as the best for

such work is one in which the fuel is burned in a steel bomb filled with compressed

oxygen. The function of the oxygen, which is ordinarily under a pressure of about 25

atmospheres, is to cause the rapid and complete combustion of the fuel sample. The fuel is

ignited by means of an electric current, allowance being made for the heat produced bysuch current, and by the burning of the fuse wire.

http://www.gutenberg.org/files/22657/22657-h/chapters/value.html#page_183






A calorimeter of this type which will be found to give satisfactory results is that of M.

Pierre Mahler, illustrated in Fig. 24 and consisting of the following parts:

A water jacket A, which maintains constant conditions outside of the calorimeter proper,

and thus makes possible a more accurate computation of radiation losses.

The porcelain lined steel bomb B, in which the combustion of the fuel takes place in

compressed oxygen.

FIG. 24. M AHLER BOMB C ALORIMETER

[Pg 185]

The platinum pan C , for holding the fuel.

The calorimeter proper D, surrounding the bomb and containing a definite weighed

amount of water.

An electrode E , connecting with the fuse wire F , for igniting the fuel placed in the pan C .

A support G, for a water agitator.

A thermometer I , for temperature determination of the water in the calorimeter. The

thermometer is best supported by a stand independent of the calorimeter, so that it may

not be moved by tremors in the parts of the calorimeter, which would render the making

of readings difficult. To obtain accuracy of readings, they should be made through a

telescope or eyeglass.

A spring and screw device for revolving the agitator.

A lever L, by the movement of which the agitator is revolved.

A pressure gauge M , for noting the amount of oxygen admitted to the bomb. Between 20

and 25 atmospheres are ordinarily employed.



An oxygen tank O.

A battery or batteries P , the current from which heats the fuse wire used to ignite the fuel.

This or a similar calorimeter is used in the determination of the heat of combustion of solid

or liquid fuels. Whatever the fuel to be tested, too much importance cannot be given to the

securing of an average sample. Where coal is to be tested, tests should be made from a

portion of the dried and pulverized laboratory sample, the methods of obtaining whichhave been described. In considering the methods of calorimeter determination, the

remarks applied to coal are equally applicable to any solid fuel, and such changes in

methods as are necessary for liquid fuels will be self-evident from the same description.

Approximately one gram of the pulverized dried coal sample should be placed directly in

the pan of the calorimeter. There is some danger in the using of a pulverized sample from

the fact that some of it may be blown out of the pan when oxygen is admitted. This may be

at least partially overcome by forming about two grams into a briquette by the use of a

cylinder equipped with a plunger and a screw press. Such a briquette should be brokenand approximately one gram used. If a pulverized sample is used, care should be taken to

admit oxygen slowly to prevent blowing the coal out of the pan. The weight of the sample

is limited to approximately one gram since the calorimeter is proportioned for the

combustion of about this weight when under an oxygen pressure of about 25 atmospheres.

A piece of fine iron wire is connected to the lower end of the plunger to form a fuse for

igniting the sample. The weight of iron wire used is determined, and if after combustion a

portion has not been burned, the weight of such portion is determined. In placing the

sample in the pan, and in adjusting the fuse, the top of the calorimeter is removed. It is

then replaced and carefully screwed into place on the bomb by means of a long handledwrench furnished for the purpose.

The bomb is then placed in the calorimeter, which has been filled with a definite amount of

water. This weight is the “water equivalent” of the apparatus, i. e., the weight of water, the

temperature of which would be increased one degree for an equivalent increase in the

temperature of the combined apparatus. It may be determined by calculation from the

weights and specific heats of the various parts of [Pg 186]the apparatus. Such a

determination is liable to error, however, as the weight of the bomb lining can only be

approximated, and a considerable portion of the apparatus is not submerged. Anothermethod of making such a determination is by the adding of definite weights of warm water

to definite amounts of cooler water in the calorimeter and taking an average of a number

of experiments. The best method for the making of such a determination is probably the

burning of a definite amount of resublimed naphthaline whose heat of combustion is

known.

The temperature of the water in the water jacket of the calorimeter should be

approximately that of the surrounding atmosphere. The temperature of the weighed

amount of water in the calorimeter is made by some experimenters slightly greater than

that of the surrounding air in order that the initial correction for radiation will be in thesame direction as the final correction. Other experimenters start from a temperature the

same or slightly lower than the temperature of the room, on the basis that the temperature



after combustion will be slightly higher than the room temperature and the radiation

correction be either a minimum or entirely eliminated.

While no experiments have been made to show conclusively which of these methods is the

better, the latter is generally used.

After the bomb has been placed in the calorimeter, it is filled with oxygen from a tank until

the pressure reaches from 20 to 25 atmospheres. The lower pressure will be sufficient inall but exceptional cases. Connection is then made to a current from the dry batteries in

series so arranged as to allow completion of the circuit with a switch. The current from a

lighting system should not be used for ignition, as there is danger from sparking in burning

the fuse, which may effect the results. The apparatus is then ready for the test.

Unquestionably the best method of taking data is by the use of co-ordinate paper and a

plotting of the data with temperatures and time intervals as ordinates and abscissae. Such

a graphic representation is shown in Fig. 25.

FIG. 25. GRAPHIC METHOD OF RECORDING BOMB C ALORIMETER RESULTS

After the bomb is placed in the calorimeter, and before the coal is ignited, readings of thetemperature of the water should be taken at one minute intervals for a period long enough

to insure a constant rate of change, and in this way determine the initial radiation. The coal

is then ignited by completing the circuit, the temperature at the instant the circuit is closed



being considered the temperature at the beginning of the combustion. After ignition the

readings should be taken at one-half minute intervals, though because of the rapidity of

the mercury’s rise approximate readings only may be possible for at least a minute after

the firing, such readings, however, being sufficiently accurate for this period. The one-half

minute readings should be taken [Pg 187]after ignition for five minutes, and for, say, five

minutes longer at minute intervals to determine accurately the final rate of radiation.

Fig. 25 shows the results of such readings, plotted in accordance with the methodsuggested. It now remains to compute the results from this plotted data.

The radiation correction is first applied. Probably the most accurate manner of making

such correction is by the use of Pfaundler’s method, which is a modification of that of

Regnault. This assumes that in starting with an initial rate of radiation, as represented by

the inclination of the line AB, Fig. 25, and ending with a final radiation represented by the

inclination of the line CD, Fig. 25, that the rate of radiation for the intermediate

temperatures between the points B and C are proportional to the initial and final rates.

That is, the rate of radiation at a point midway between B and C will be the mean betweenthe initial and final rates; the rate of radiation at a point three-quarters of the distance

between B andC would be the rate at B plus three-quarters of the difference in rates

at B and C , etc. This method differs from Regnault’s in that the radiation was assumed by

Regnault to be in each case proportional to the difference in temperatures between the

water of the calorimeter and the surrounding air plus a constant found for each

experiment. Pfaundler’s method is more simple than that of Regnault, and the results by

the two methods are in practical agreement.

Expressed as a formula, Pfaundler’s method is, though not in form given by him:

C = N( R +

R' - R––––––––––

T' - T( T" - T ))

(19)

Where C = correction in degree centigrade,

N = number of intervals over which correction is made,

R = initial radiation in degrees per interval,

R' = final radiation in degrees per interval,

T = average temperature for period through which initial radiation is computed,

T" = average temperature over period of combustion[39],

T' = average temperature over period through which final radiation is computed.[39]

The application of this formula to Fig. 25 is as follows:

As already stated, the temperature at the beginning of combustion is the reading just

before the current is turned on, or B in Fig. 25. The point C or the temperature at which

combustion is presumably completed, should be taken at a point which falls well within

the established final rate of radiation, and not at the maximum temperature that the

thermometer indicates in the test, unless it lies on the straight line determining the final

radiation. This is due to the fact that in certain instances local conditions will cause the

thermometer to read higher than it should during the time that the bomb is transmitting

heat to the water rapidly, and at other times the maximum temperature might be lower










than that which would be indicated were readings to be taken at intervals of less than one-

half minute, i. e., the point of maximum temperature will fall below the line determined by

the final rate of radiation. With this understanding AB, Fig. 25, represents the time of initial

radiation, BC the time of [Pg 188]combustion, and CD the time of final radiation. Therefore

to apply Pfaundler’s correction, formula (19), to the data as represented by Fig. 25.

N = 6, R = 0, R' = .01, T = 20.29, T' = 22.83,

T" =20.29 + 22.54 + 22.84 + 22.88 + 22.87 + 22.86––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

6= 22.36

C = 6( 0 +

.01 - 0–––––––––––––––––––––

22.85 - 20.29( 22.36 - 20.29 ))

= 6 × .008 = .048

Pfaundler’s formula while simple is rather long. Mr. E. H. Peabody has devised a simpler

formula with which, under proper conditions, the variation from correction as found by

Pfaundler’s method is negligible.

It was noted throughout an extended series of calorimeter tests that the maximum

temperature was reached by the thermometer slightly over one minute after the time of

firing. If this period between the time of firing and the maximum temperature reported

was exactly one minute, the radiation through this period would equal the radiation per

one-half minutebefore firing plus the radiation per one-half minute after the maximum

temperature is reached ; or, the radiation through the one minute interval would be the

average of the radiation per minute before firing and the radiation per minute after the

maximum. A plotted chart of temperatures would take the form of a curve of three straight lines (B, C' , D) in Fig. 25. Under such conditions, using the notation as in formula (19) the

correction would become,

C =2R + 2R'–––––––––––––––

2+ ( N - 2 ) R', or R + (N - 1)R' ( 20)

This formula may be generalized for conditions where the maximum temperature is

reached after a period of more than one minute as follows:

Let M = the number of intervals between the time of firing and the maximum temperature.

Then the radiation through this period will be an average of the radiation for M intervals

before firing and for M intervals after the maximum is recorded, or

C =MR + MR'–––––––––––––––––

2+ ( N - M ) R' =

M––––

2R + ( N -

M––––

2) R' ( 21)

In the case of Mr. Peabody’s deductions M was found to be approximately 2 and formula

( 21) becomes directly, C = R + (N - 1)R' or formula ( 20).

The corrections to be made, as secured by the use of this formula, are very close to those

secured by Pfaundler’s method, where the point of maximum temperature is not more

than five intervals later than the point of firing. Where a longer period than this is


















indicated in the chart of plotted temperatures, the approximate formula should not be

used. As the period between firing and the maximum temperature is increased, the plotted

results are further and further away from the theoretical straight line curve. Where this

period is not over five intervals, or two and a half minutes, an approximation of the

straight line curve may be plotted by eye, and ordinarily the radiation correction to be

applied may be determined very closely from such an approximated curve.

Peabody’s approximate formula has been found from a number of tests to give resultswithin .003 degrees Fahrenheit for the limits within which its application holds [Pg

189]good as described. The value of M, which is not necessarily a whole number, should be

determined for each test, though in all probability such a value is a constant for any

individual calorimeter which is properly operated.

The correction for radiation as found on page 188 is in all instances to be added to the

range of temperature between the firing point and the point chosen from which the final

radiation is calculated. This corrected range multiplied by the water equivalent of the

calorimeter gives the heat of combustion in calories of the coal burned in the calorimetertogether with that evolved by the burning of the fuse wire. The heat evolved by the

burning of the fuse wire is found from the determination of the actual weight of wire

burned and the heat of combustion of one milligram of the wire (1.7 calories), i. e., multiply

the weight of wire used by 1.7, the result being in gram calories or the heat required to

raise one gram of water one degree centigrade.

Other small corrections to be made are those for the formation of nitric acid and for the

combustion of sulphur to sulphuric acid instead of sulphur dioxide, due to the more

complete combustion in the presence of oxygen than would be possible in the atmosphere.

To make these corrections the bomb of the calorimeter is carefully washed out with water

after each test and the amount of acid determined from titrating this water with a standard

solution of ammonia or of caustic soda, all of the acid being assumed to be nitric acid. Each

cubic centimeter of the ammonia titrating solution used is equivalent to a correction of

2.65 calories.

As part of acidity is due to the formation of sulphuric acid, a further correction is

necessary. In burning sulphuric acid the heat evolved per gram of sulphur is 2230 calories

in excess of the heat which would be evolved if the sulphur burned to sulphur dioxide, or22.3 calories for each per cent of sulphur in the coal. One cubic centimeter of the ammonia

solution is equivalent to 0.00286 grams of sulphur as sulphuric acid, or to 0.286 × 22.3 =

6.38 calories. It is evident therefore that after multiplying the number of cubic centimeters

used in titrating by the heat factor for nitric acid (2.65) a further correction of 6.38 - 2.65 =

3.73 is necessary for each cubic centimeter used in titrating sulphuric instead of nitric acid.

This correction will be 3.73⁄0.297 = 13 units for each 0.01 gram of sulphur in the coal.

The total correction therefore for the aqueous nitric and sulphuric acid is found by

multiplying the ammonia by 2.65 and adding 13 calories for each 0.01 gram of sulphur in

the coal. This total correction is to be deducted from the heat value as found from thecorrected range and the amount equivalent to the calorimeter.







After each test the pan in which the coal has been burned must be carefully examined to

make sure that all of the sample has undergone complete combustion. The presence of

black specks ordinarily indicates unburned coal, and often will be found where the coal

contains bone or slate. Where such specks are found the tests should be repeated. In

testing any fuel where it is found difficult to completely consume a sample, a weighed

amount of naphthaline may be added, the total weight of fuel and naphthaline being

approximately one gram. The naphthaline has a known heat of combustion, samples for

this purpose being obtainable from the United States Bureau of Standards, and from the

combined heat of combustion of the fuel and naphthaline that of the former may be readily

computed.

The heat evolved in burning of a definite weight of standard naphthaline may also be used

as a means of calibrating the calorimeter as a whole.

Table of Contents Next Chapter

FOOTNOTES

[36]See page 161.

[37]U. S. Geological Survey.

[38]See “Steam Boiler Economy”, page 47, First Edition.

[39]To agree with Pfaundler’s formula the end ordinates should be given half values in determining T", i. e., T" =((Temp. at B + Temp. at C) ÷ 2 + Temp. all other ordinates) ÷ N

Table of Contents Next Chapter



http://www.gutenberg.org/files/22657/22657-h/chapters/coal.html


http://www.gutenberg.org/files/22657/22657-h/chapters/value.html#fnanchor_36


http://www.gutenberg.org/files/22657/22657-h/chapters/fluegas.html#page_161




















Heating Values of Fuel

Documents

Transcript of Heating Values of Fuel