Heated Soil Vapor Extraction (HSVE) Pilot Project at United

18
Heated Soil Vapor Extraction (HSVE) Pilot Project at United Cleaners Lemont, Illinois Juho So, Ph.D. IDERTF

Transcript of Heated Soil Vapor Extraction (HSVE) Pilot Project at United

Page 1: Heated Soil Vapor Extraction (HSVE) Pilot Project at United

Heated Soil Vapor Extraction (HSVE) Pilot Project at United Cleaners Lemont, Illinois

Juho So, Ph.D. IDERTF

Page 2: Heated Soil Vapor Extraction (HSVE) Pilot Project at United

Overview

� 1. Chronicles � 2. What is HSVE � 3. Technical Information � 4. Cost Information � 5. Future Plans � 6. Lessons Learned � 7. Q & A

Page 3: Heated Soil Vapor Extraction (HSVE) Pilot Project at United

Chronicles

� 08/15/01: Claim was filed � 01/23/02: Initial site investigation completed

SOW Depth Contamination a. 8 SBs 15 ft 4,300 ppm (~ 3 ft)

2,540 ppm (~15 ft) b. 11SBs&4MWs 35 ft 48 ppm (~ 7 ft) c. 10 SBs 50 ft 480 ppm (~ 6 ft) d. 4 SBs 15 ft Not Happened !!

Remediation Objectives (RO) for PCE: 110 ppm (Ingestion)

Page 4: Heated Soil Vapor Extraction (HSVE) Pilot Project at United

Chronicles (Continued)

� 02/21/02: Remedial Action Plan (RAP) � 02/21/02: Projected Pilot Project Costs

� Consulting: $ 35,000.00� Vendor Cost $ 27,502.15

� 09/02/02: Initial Installation � Dec. 02: Confirmatory SI Å Failed to Meet the RO � Jan. 03 : 60-days extension Å Failed to Meet the RO � Mar. 03 :120 days extension Å Failed to Meet the RO

Æ Found more (?) PCE: 4,700 ppm (~ 4 ft)1,300 ppm (~ 24 ft)

� 12/05/03: Additional Site Investigation � 12 SBs (32 ft) Å mostly delineated (by RO)

Page 5: Heated Soil Vapor Extraction (HSVE) Pilot Project at United

Heated Soil Vapor Extraction (HSVE) System

� Enhances the volatilization of VOCs by supplemental heat � Heat Source: Underground pipes which contain heated material � Heated Material: water (or oil with polymer) � Strengths:

� Relatively easy to install & inexpensive� Faster result than conventional SVE system

� Weaknesses: � Occupies a larger space than conventional SVE system � Additional heat source is needed � More maintenance is required (boiler failure) � Retains all of the problems of SVE system (short circuit, etc.)

Page 6: Heated Soil Vapor Extraction (HSVE) Pilot Project at United

Technical Information

� 41 SBs (or 33 SBs) & 4 MWs (dry): 50 ft � Deepest Contamination at 24 ft � Highest Contamination: 4,700 ppm � Area to be Remediated: 40 ft (H) x 20 ft (W) � Volume to be Remediated: 40 ft (H) x 20 ft (W) x 30 ft (D)

(due to depth Æ much larger area Æ much more volume !)

� No GW down to 50 ft� K (Hydraulic Conductivity) = 1 x 10-8 cm/sec (lab test)� FOC (Fraction of Organic Carbon) = 1.3 % - 2.0 %� Soil Type: very tight clay.

Page 7: Heated Soil Vapor Extraction (HSVE) Pilot Project at United
Page 8: Heated Soil Vapor Extraction (HSVE) Pilot Project at United
Page 9: Heated Soil Vapor Extraction (HSVE) Pilot Project at United
Page 10: Heated Soil Vapor Extraction (HSVE) Pilot Project at United
Page 11: Heated Soil Vapor Extraction (HSVE) Pilot Project at United
Page 12: Heated Soil Vapor Extraction (HSVE) Pilot Project at United
Page 13: Heated Soil Vapor Extraction (HSVE) Pilot Project at United
Page 14: Heated Soil Vapor Extraction (HSVE) Pilot Project at United
Page 15: Heated Soil Vapor Extraction (HSVE) Pilot Project at United

Cost Information ($109,536.91 as of 04/30/2004) � Site Investigation: $44,054.76� 33 SBs & 4 MWs � 90 VOCs � Note: SI Cost for 8 SBs before the Fund:

$8,000 is NOT Included.

� HSVE Pilot Project: $65,482.15� $ 2,980.00: RAP � $ 62,502.15 HSVE Installation &

Maintenance)

Page 16: Heated Soil Vapor Extraction (HSVE) Pilot Project at United

Future PlansRemediation Objectives for PCE: 408 ppm (Csat)

� Evaluating the Following Remedial Technologies: � Options Issues

� Chemical Oxidation a. Overkill for Oxidant: FOC = 1.3 % ~ 2.0 % b. Many many injection points: K= 1x 10-8 cm./sec

� Excavation a. Down to 30 ft Structural Issue

� Electrical Heating a. Cost $500,000 and up (?) b. Utility Issues

Page 17: Heated Soil Vapor Extraction (HSVE) Pilot Project at United

Lessons Learned

� The more soil borings, the better it is� Especially in the tight clay soil zone� Hit or Miss?

� Be realistically optimistic � Vendor’s statement: 80- 90 % of contamination

removal in 2 months according to the modeling bysuper computer (!!)

� Takes longer than expected. � Tight clay is always the problem.

� Sanders Cleaners � Two additional Injections � Three times more costs than originally expected

(if successful !?).

Page 18: Heated Soil Vapor Extraction (HSVE) Pilot Project at United

Q & A

� Any Advice ?!