PwC Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets
Health Law Developments for 2018 March 21, 2018...compensation to a covered employee that is...
Transcript of Health Law Developments for 2018 March 21, 2018...compensation to a covered employee that is...
icemiller.com icemiller.com
Deepali Doddi (312) 726-7134
Sherry Fabina-Abney (317) 236-2446
Tara Schulstad Sciscoe (317) 236-5888
Kevin C. Woodhouse (317) 236-2154
Health Law Developments for 2018
March 21, 2018
1
I/12848080.1
icemiller.com
Introduction
Health Care Privacy and Cyber Security Update
Employee Benefits Legislative Update
Prescribing and Dispensing of Opioids
HIP 2.0 Waiver Extension
AGENDA
2
I/12848080.1
icemiller.com
Health Care Privacy and Cybersecurity
Update
3
Deepali Doddi (312) 726-7134
I/12848080.1
icemiller.com
Presence Health (Jan. 2017; $475k settlement)
Children’s Medical Center of Dallas (Feb. 2017; $3.2
million civil money penalty)
Memorial Healthcare System (Feb. 2017; $5.5 million
settlement)
St. Luke’s-Roosevelt Hospital Center (May 2017;
$387k)
21st Century Oncology (Dec. 2017; $2.3 million)
OCR HIPAA Enforcement : 2017 Highlights
4
I/12848080.1
icemiller.com
Fresenius Medical Care North America (Feb. 2018;
$3.5 million)
Filefax, Inc. (Feb. 2018; $100k)
And more to come…
OCR HIPAA Enforcement: 2018
5
I/12848080.1
icemiller.com
Emblem Health (New York AG; March 2018; $575k
settlement)
University of Rochester Medical Center (New York
AG; Dec. 2015; $15k settlement)
Dr. Beck (Indiana AG; Jan. 2015; $12k settlement)
Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island
(Massachusetts AG; July 2014; $150k settlement)
State Attorney General Enforcement
6
I/12848080.1
icemiller.com
Phase 2 desk audits have been completed
Phase 2 on-site audits not currently scheduled
OCR will publish report on best practices gleaned
from Phase 2 desk audits
Remember: HITECH Act established a permanent
audit program
OCR’s Phase 2 Audit Program
7
I/12848080.1
icemiller.com
Trending Issue: Ransomware
8
I/12848080.1
icemiller.com
Trending Issue: “Curious” Workforce Members
• UCLA Health System ($865,500 settlement with OCR)
• Snooping employees improperly accessed electronic records of high-profile celebrities
• Walgreen Co. v. Hinchy, 21 N.E.3d 99 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014)
9
I/12848080.1
icemiller.com
Trending Issue: Mobile Device Security
• Cancer Care Group (Sept. 2018; $750k settlement with OCR)
• Theft of unencrypted backup media containing ePHI of 55,000 individuals from employee’s car
“Organizations must complete a comprehensive risk analysis and establish
strong policies and procedures to protect patients’ health information,” said
former OCR Director Jocelyn Samuels. “Further, proper encryption of
mobile devices and electronic media reduces the likelihood of a breach of
protected health information.”
10
I/12848080.1
icemiller.com
Trending Issue: Paper PHI
11
I/12848080.1
icemiller.com
Trending Issue: Internet of Health Things (IoHT)
12
I/12848080.1
icemiller.com
Employee Benefits
Legislative Update
13
I/12848080.1
Tara Schulstad Sciscoe
(317) 236-5888
icemiller.com
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017
Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018
Court decisions
Overview
I/12848080.1
14
icemiller.com
Tax Cut and Jobs Act adds a new Code Section
4960 which imposes a 21% excise tax on:
Remuneration in excess of $1 million dollars paid for a
taxable year by a tax-exempt organization with respect
to the employment of a covered employee; and
Excess parachute payments paid by a tax-exempt
organization to a covered employee for the taxable
year.
Excise tax is paid by the employer.
Effective January 1, 2018.
New Excise Tax on Covered Employees
I/12848080.1
15
icemiller.com
A tax-exempt organization includes:
An organization described in Code Section 501(c).
An organization whose income is excluded from
taxation under Code Section 115.
A covered employee is:
Five highest compensated employees of the
organization for the tax year.
Any employee who has ever been a covered
employee for a tax year beginning on or after January
1, 2017.
New Excise Tax on Covered Employees (cont’d)
I/12848080.1
16
icemiller.com
Remuneration generally includes all taxable wages.
Includes Code Section 457(f) and QEBA distributions.
Includes remuneration paid by a related person or
governmental entity (controlled group).
Does not include amounts paid to a licensed medical
professional for the performance of medical services.
New Excise Tax on Covered Employees (cont’d)
I/12848080.1
17
icemiller.com
An excess parachute payment is the amount by
which a parachute payment exceeds the base
amount allocable to such payment.
A parachute payment is any payment in the nature of
compensation to a covered employee that is
contingent on separation from employment, and
exceeds three times the average annual
compensation for the most recent five taxable years.
Does not include amounts paid to a licensed medical
professional for the performance of medical services.
New Excise Tax on Covered Employees (cont’d)
I/12848080.1
18
icemiller.com
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act eliminates the employer
deduction under Code Section 274 for the cost of
entertainment, amusement or recreation, regardless
of its relationship to employer’s business.
Effective January 1, 2018.
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act eliminates the employer
deduction under Code Section 119 for meals
provided to the employee by the employer on
business premises for employer's convenience
Effective January 1, 2026
Still excludible from employees' wages.
Employer Deductions Eliminated
I/12848080.1
19
icemiller.com
Code Section 132 excludes from employees’ gross
income the value of a de minimus fringe benefit,
which generally includes value of a nondiscriminatory
eating facility operated by the employer on or near its
business premises.
The employer received a 100% deduction of
expenses associated with providing the eating facility.
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act reduces the employer
deduction to 50% effective January 1, 2017, and
eliminates the employer deduction effective
January 1, 2026.
Employer Deductions Eliminated (cont'd)
I/12848080.1
20
icemiller.com
Code Section 132(a) excludes from gross income
qualified transportation fringe benefits, such as
community and parking related expenses.
An employer can also deduct the cost of qualified
transportation fringe benefits.
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act eliminates the employer’s
deduction beginning January 1, 2018, to the extent
that the benefits are excluded from the employee’s
gross income.
Qualified Transportation Expenses
I/12848080.1
21
icemiller.com
Under Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, qualified bicycle
community reimbursements are no longer
excludable from an employee’s gross income, but
will be taxed as wages.
These include expenses for the purchase of a bicycle,
bicycle improvements, repair, and storage, if the
bicycle is regularly used for travel between the
employee’s residence and employment.
These payments may be deducted by the employer.
Effective January 1, 2018 through December 31,
2025.
Biking Related Benefits
I/12848080.1
22
icemiller.com
Under Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, unrelated business
taxable income (UBTI) is increased by the amount
the employer pays for
qualified transportation fringe benefits or
for a parking facility used in connection with qualified
parking and on premise athletic facilities.
Governmental plans continue to have same
arguments against the application of UBTI that have
historically been utilized.
Unrelated Business Taxable Income
I/12848080.1
23
icemiller.com
Code Section 274(j) provides for a limited employer
deduction for the cost of an employee achievement
award, and the value is also excludible from
employee’s gross income.
An employee achievement award is tangible personal
property that an employer gives to an employee at a
meaningful presentation for an achievement related to
length of service or safety.
Clarification: does not include cash, cash
equivalents, gift cards, vacations, meals, lodging,
theatre or sports tickets, stocks, bonds, etc.
Effective January 1, 2018.
Employee Achievement Awards
I/12848080.1
24
icemiller.com
IRS announced HSA contribution limits for individual
and family coverage in spring of 2017.
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act changed the method for
determining inflation-related increases.
IRS recalculated limits, and issued Rev. Proc. 2018-
18 in March 2018, revising the maximum family
contribution to an HSA from $6,900 to $6,850.
Individuals may need to change their elections if they
had intended to make the maximum family
contribution, or withdraw $50 prior to April 15, 2019, if
the maximum contribution has already been made.
Health Savings Accounts
I/12848080.1
25
icemiller.com
An individual can make contributions to a HSA if,
among other requirements, he/she is covered by a
high deductible health plan (HDHP).
A HDHP cannot pay medical expenses until a
minimum deductible is satisfied for the year, but can
pay certain preventive care benefits.
IRS Notice 2018-12 clarifies that male contraception
and male sterilization are not preventive services
for purposes of a health plan qualifying as a HDHP.
Transition relief through December 31, 2019.
Health Savings Accounts (cont’d)
I/12848080.1
26
icemiller.com
Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018
Deletes requirement that elective deferrals must be suspended for 6 months under safe harbor for determining whether a need is “necessary.”
Clarifies that a distribution will not fail to be made for hardship simply because the employee does not take an available loan under the plan.
Expands sources from which hardship distributions can be made to include earnings on elective deferrals, QNECs, and QMACs.
Impacts 401(k) plans and – maybe – 403(b) plans.
Effective January 1, 2019
Changes to Hardship Distributions
I/12848080.1
27
icemiller.com
US District Court of Columbia issued a decision on
August 22, 2017, vacating the EEOC's final wellness
regulations under the Americans with Disabilities Act
and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination
effective January 1, 2019.
Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision on
March 15, 2018, vacating the Department of Labor's
final fiduciary regulations.
Court Decisions
I/12848080.1
28
icemiller.com icemiller.com
Prescribing and Dispensing of
Opioids: Legal Update
29
I/12848080.1
icemiller.com 30
Indiana Code § 25-1-9.7
Applies to opioid prescriptions only
4 parts: 3 apply to prescribers and 1 applies to
pharmacists
Limits prescription to 7 days for certain patients
unless exception
Requires prescription limits if requested by specific
individuals
Allows pharmacist to partial fill if requested
Requires certain medical record documentation
Became effective July 1, 2017
I/12848080.1
30
icemiller.com
“[A] prescriber may issue a prescription for an opioid
only if the following limitations are met:
(1) If the prescription is for an adult who is being
prescribed an opioid for the first time by the
prescriber, the initial prescription may not exceed a
seven (7) day supply.
(2) If the prescription is for a child who is less than
eighteen (18) years of age, the prescription may not
exceed a seven (7) day supply.”
31
General Rule
I/12848080.1
31
icemiller.com
Opioid prescription is for
(A) Cancer.
(B) Palliative care.
(C) Medication-assisted treatment for a substance
use disorder.
(D) [A condition . . . adopted by rule by the medical
licensing board] . . . .”*
*MLB voted to not add any additional treatment
exceptions (9. 27. 2017)
32
Exceptions
I/12848080.1
32
icemiller.com
Professional Judgment Exception
“ If, in the professional judgment of a prescriber, a
patient requires more than the prescription
limitations specified in subsection (a).”
33
Exceptions
I/12848080.1
33
icemiller.com
Statute addresses initial opioid prescriptions by prescribing provider
Seems to be targeting acute pain opioid prescriptions
If palliative or professional judgment exception used, need additional documentation
In on-call or coverage situations, if an initial opioid prescription, there is the 7-day or less limitation or professional judgment exception
Although not explicit non-compliance may expose prescribers to the risk of a licensing board action given location in the Chapter
Documentation is evidence of compliance
34
What Does This Mean for Prescribing Providers?
I/12848080.1
34
icemiller.com
If prescribing provider
(1)determines that a drug other than an opioid is
not appropriate; and
(2)uses palliative care or professional judgment
exemption and issues a prescription that
exceeds the limitations for a child or first
opioid prescription to an adult
then provider must document in the medical
record.
Exception Documentation Required
35
I/12848080.1
35
icemiller.com
Statute requires documentation that:
The indication that a drug other than an opiate was
not appropriate and
The patient is receiving palliative care or that the
prescriber is using the prescriber’s professional
judgment for the exemption.
Ind. Code §25-1-9.7-2(c).
36
Required Documentation
I/12848080.1
36
icemiller.com 37
What Does this Mean for Prescribing Providers?
I/12848080.1
37
No additional documentation if opioid script is for
cancer or MAT
Palliative care or professional judgment exception
requires documentation
Indication documentation ought to be patient-specific
This is documentation on top of what provider should
be documenting
Best practice is to discuss/document the risk and
benefits of the opioid provider is recommending for
informed consent purposes
icemiller.com
Prescriber shall, upon the request of the:
(1) patient;
(2) patient’s personal or legal representative; or
(3) patient’s guardian;
“issue the opioid prescription for a lesser amount than the
prescriber initially intended to prescribe, issue the opioid
prescription for the lesser amount, and indicate the
request and who made the request in the patient’s
medical file.”
Ind. Code §25-1-9.7-3.
38
Requested Limitations
I/12848080.1
38
icemiller.com
Uncertain if statute is trying to enlist those in the medical consent
statute.
Statute does not define “guardian”, “legal representative” “personal
representative.”
A legal guardian and legal representative should have legal
documents--healthcare powers of attorney, health care representative.
Listen to the patients/others listed in the statute and adjust the
prescription accordingly.
Prescribe for the patient’s best interest, not the prescriber’s
convenience.
Competent adult patients have autonomy to direct care so if conflict try
to work out and document.
Unclear why statute refers to “medical file” v. “medical record”.
39
What Does this Mean for Prescribing Providers?
I/12848080.1
39
icemiller.com
For a partial fill of an opioid prescription, a
pharmacist shall dispense, upon request of the:
(1) patient;
(2) patient’s personal or legal representative; or
(3) patient’s guardian;
the lesser amount requested.
40
Pharmacist: Partial Fill
I/12848080.1
40
icemiller.com
If an opioid prescription is partially filled under
subsection (a), the pharmacist must:
(1) Comply with the partial refill requirements set forth in
21 U.S.C. 829.
(2) Document that an individual described in subsection
(a) for whom the partial prescription was filled (or the
individual’s personal or legal representative or
guardian) requested the partially filled prescription.
41
Documentation and Federal Compliance
I/12848080.1
41
icemiller.com
(f) Partial fills of schedule II controlled substances.
(1) A prescription . . . may be partially filled if –
(A) it is not prohibited by State law;
(B) the prescription is written and filled in accordance
with this title, regulations prescribed by the
Attorney General, and State law;
(C) the partial fill is requested by the patient or the
practitioner that wrote the prescription; and
(D) the total quantity dispensed in all partial fillings
does not exceed the total quantity prescribed.
42
21 U.S. Code Section 829
I/12848080.1
42
icemiller.com
(2) Remaining portions.
(A) In general. Except as provided in subparagraph (B),
remaining portions of a partially filled prescription for a
controlled substance in schedule II –
(i) may be filled; and
(ii) shall be filled not later than 30 days after the date
on which the prescription is written.
43
21 U.S. Code Section 829
I/12848080.1
43
icemiller.com
(B) Emergency situations. In emergency situations, as
described in 21 U.S.C. 829 (a), the remaining portions of
a partially filled prescription for a controlled substance in
schedule II –
(i) may be filled; and
(ii) shall be filled not later than 72 hours after the
prescription is issued.
44
21 U.S. Code Section 829
I/12848080.1
44
icemiller.com
Potentially more work for the pharmacist
A patient many not follow providers treatment plan
and ask pharmacist for less
Guardians, legal representatives and personal
representatives will have a say in the prescription
amount
A pharmacist may question first time prescriptions of
adults over 7 days
45
What Does This Mean for Providers?
I/12848080.1
45
icemiller.com 46
Healthy Indiana Plan 2.0 Waiver
Extension
Kevin C. Woodhousei (317) 236-21544
I/12848080.1
*Thank you to Stephen Cornelius of Ice Miller LLP for
assistance in preparing these slides
icemiller.com
On January 11, 2018, CMS issued a State Medicaid Director Letter with new guidance for Section 1115 waiver proposals that would impose work requirements as a condition of eligibility
Indiana requested extension of the Section 1115 demonstration waiver for Indiana’s Healthy Indiana Plan 2.0 (“HIP 2.0”)
CMS granted Indiana’s request on Feb. 1, 2018
The extension request amended several key aspects of Indiana’s HIP 2.0 program, and its approval of a work requirement signaled a reversal of two decades of policy under both Democratic and Republican administrations
HIP 2.0 Waiver Extension - Background
I/12848080.1
47
icemiller.com
HIP was originally used to implement Medicaid
expansion in Indiana under then Governor Mike
Pence; began on February 1, 2015
Included a provision under which most adults with
income from 101-138% of the federal poverty level
pay amounts into Personal Wellness and
Responsibility (“POWER”) account
Imposed a 6-month coverage lock-out on those with
income from 101-138% of the federal poverty level
who fail to pay premiums after a 60-day grace period
HIP 2.0 Review – Certain Key Provisions
I/12848080.1
48
icemiller.com
Delayed coverage until the 1st premium payment, or
for those from 0-100% of the federal poverty level,
after expiration of the 60-day payment period
Enrolled adults who pay premiums in HIP Plus, an
expanded benefit package with copayments only for
non-emergency use of ER
A plan with a more basic benefit package, HIP Basic,
is available for individuals at or below 100% of the
federal poverty level who do not make monthly
POWER account contributions
HIP 2.0 Review – Certain Key Provisions
I/12848080.1
49
icemiller.com
Allows a 50% increase in premiums for smokers in second year of enrollment
Allows disenrollment and a 3-month lockout for expansion adults who fail to complete the eligibility renewal process on a timely basis
Changes premiums to a tiered structure instead of a flat 2% of income – increases as income relative to FPL increases
Expands some coverage of substance abuse disorders for Medicaid beneficiaries, ages 21 to 64, receiving SUD treatment in an Institution for Mental Diseases
Conditions Medicaid eligibility for many adults on meeting a work requirement beginning in 2019
HIP 2.0 Changes and New Provisions
(Approved Feb. 2018)
I/12848080.1
50
icemiller.com
Indiana was the 2nd state CMS approved to include a work
requirement as a condition for Medicaid eligibility; Kentucky was the
1st ; as of mid-January, 2018, 7 other states had pending waiver
requests at CMS that would require work as a condition of eligibility
Work Requirement Details
Time on Medicaid Weekly Work Requirement
1-6 months No weekly hour requirement
7-9 months 5 hours / week
10-12 months 10 hours / week
13-18 months 15 hours / week
18+ months 20 hours / week
I/12848080.1
51
icemiller.com
Several activities can satisfy the work requirement, including:
Employment
Job searches
Education
Job skills training
Community training public services
Volunteer work
Caregiving for non-dependent relative or other individuals with chronic disabling health conditions
Work requirements are determined in December each year. Individuals not in compliance will be suspended January 1 of the following year
Work Requirement Details (cont.)
I/12848080.1
52
icemiller.com
There are several ways an individual can be exempt from a work requirement for a given month, including:
Full or part-time students
Pregnancy
Primary caregiver of dependent child below mandatory education age or dependent with a disability
Medically frail
Documented temporary illness or disability
In active substance use disorder treatment program
Over age of 59
Eligible for good cause exemption, including persons with disabilities and victims of domestic violence
Work Requirement Exemptions
I/12848080.1
53
icemiller.com
Excess hours worked in any given week can be
applied to another week in the same month
Work hours may be documented in several ways:
Online
By phone
By mail
In person
The State may also develop a self-attestation
Work Requirement (cont.)
I/12848080.1
54
icemiller.com
The work requirement is a significant change to the
Medicaid program in Indiana
However, various activities qualify as work and there
are a number of exemptions as well, so it is unclear
exactly how much impact the new work requirement
will have
All interested parties will have to monitor
developments over the next few years
Work Requirement Practical Effects
I/12848080.1
55
icemiller.com
Authority to test graduated copayments up to $25 for
non-emergent use of emergency room; instead, non-
emergent use of ER is subject to a flat $8 copay
Authority to use Medicaid as premium assistance for
those with employer-sponsored insurance
HIP 2.0 Discontinued Provisions
(approved Feb. 2018)
I/12848080.1
56
icemiller.com icemiller.com 57
I/12848080.1
icemiller.com
58 58
I/12848080.1