HEALTH AND SAFETY (H&S) CONSTRUCTION … · 2011-02-23 · Builders South Africa ... 2010 Study: 13...

30
THE NATURE AND CONTENTS OF HEALTH AND SAFETY (H&S) SPECIFICATIONS HEALTH AND SAFETY (H&S) CONSTRUCTION SEMINAR KEMPTON PARK, 10-11 FEBRUARY 2011 PROFESSOR JOHN SMALLWOOD CONSTRUCTION RESEARCH EDUCATION AND TRAINING ENTERPRISES (CREATE) [email protected] COPYRIGHT 2003 REVISED 2008 AND 2011

Transcript of HEALTH AND SAFETY (H&S) CONSTRUCTION … · 2011-02-23 · Builders South Africa ... 2010 Study: 13...

THE NATURE AND CONTENTS OF

HEALTH AND SAFETY (H&S) SPECIFICATIONS

HEALTH AND SAFETY (H&S) CONSTRUCTION SEMINAR

KEMPTON PARK, 10-11 FEBRUARY 2011

PROFESSOR JOHN SMALLWOOD

CONSTRUCTION RESEARCH EDUCATION AND TRAINING ENTERPRISES

(CREATE)

[email protected]

COPYRIGHT 2003 REVISED 2008 AND 2011

2

Introduction (1)

© 2008 Prof JJ Smallwood

Sheer-face construction, Aerial Cableway Station, Table Mountain (Deacon, 1997)

3

Introduction (2)

© 2003 Prof JJ Smallwood

Bush-hammered concrete, UPE (Smallwood, 1994)

Introduction (3)

The Construction Regulations require clients to provide

principal contractors (PCs) with H&S specifications

The definition of H&S specification refers to H&S

requirements

The contents are implicitly as opposed to explicitly

stated

Based upon the client and designer requirements the

contents are implied

Construction Regulations are not unique – can be

argued that they were spawned by European Directive

92/57

© 2007 Prof JJ Smallwood

Introduction (4)

A range of international literature informs regarding the role and influence of design on construction H&S

‘H&S through design’ is at the top of the hierarchy of controls (Hecker and Gambatese, 2003)

Given: The third anniversary of the promulgation of the Construction

Regulations

Anecdotal evidence that the contents of H&S specifications are a regurgitation of the Construction Regulations

© 2007 Prof JJ Smallwood

Introduction (5)

An initial study was conducted in 2007 to determine the

(Smallwood, 2007):

Prevalence of H&S specifications

Degree of project specificity of H&S specifications

Length of project specifications

Extent to which various aspects / issues are addressed in H&S

specifications

Degree of concurrence relative to a range of H&S specification

related statements

The initial study was followed by a further study in 2010

© 2007 Prof JJ Smallwood

Review of the literature – Recommendations

International Labour Office (ILO) (1992) specifically

states that designers should:

Receive training in H&S

Integrate the H&S of construction workers into the design and

planning process

Not include anything in a design which would necessitate the

use of dangerous structural or other procedures or hazardous

materials which could be avoided by design modifications or by

substitute materials

Take into account the H&S of workers during subsequent

maintenance

© 2003 Prof JJ Smallwood

Review of the literature – Impact of designers on

construction H&S

151 / 450 (33.6%) reports of construction workers’

deaths and disabling injuries in the USA indicate the

hazard that contributed to the incident could have been

eliminated or reduced if design-for-H&S measures had

been implemented (Behm, 2006)

© 2007 Prof JJ Smallwood

Review of the literature – Legislation (Clients)

Construction Regulations – clients must:

Prepare H&S specifications

Ensure that principal contractors (PCs) have made provision for

H&S costs in their tenders

Provide PCs with any information that might affect H&S

© 2003 Prof JJ Smallwood

Review of the literature – Legislation (Designers)

Section 10 of the OH&S Act of 1993 - designers are allocated the responsibility to ensure that any ‘article’ is safe and without risks to health

Construction Regulations – designers must: Make available all relevant information about the design such as

the soil investigation report; design loadings of the structure,

and methods and sequence of construction Inform PCs of any known or anticipated dangers or hazards or

special measures required for the safe execution of the works

Modify the design or make use of substitute materials where the design necessitates the use of dangerous structural or other procedures or materials hazardous to H&S

Ensure that during commissioning, cognisance is taken of ergonomic design principles in order to minimize ergonomic related hazards in all phases of the life cycle of a structure

© 2003 Prof JJ Smallwood

11

Methods and sequence of construction

© 2004 Dr TC Haupt and Prof JJ Smallwood

Precast concrete planks and hollow blocks to composite slab, Plettenberg

Bay (Hamp-Adams, 1994)

H&S specification

Intention is to ‘design out’ the hazards

© 2007 Prof JJ Smallwood

Research – Methodology and sample stratum

2007 Study (Smallwood, 2007):

27 General contractors (GCs) which achieved a place in the

Building Industries Federation South Africa (BIFSA) / Master

Builders South Africa (MBSA) National H&S Competition on one

or more of their projects during the period 1995 – 2005

11 GCs responded, which represents a response rate of 39.3%

2010 Study:

13 Members of the Association of Construction Health and

Safety Management (ACHASM) responded

81 Delegates attending Construction Research Education and

Training Enterprises (CREATE) H&S Specification Workshops

responded

© 2011 Prof JJ Smallwood

Research – Findings (1)

Mean percentage (approximate) of projects for which

H&S specifications are provided is:

ACHASM: 56% (2010)

Workshops: 71% (2010)

GCs: 59% (2007)

These are notable findings in that H&S specifications

are required for all projects

© 2011 Prof JJ Smallwood

Research – Findings (2)

Degree to which H&S specifications are project specific:

GCs: 3.57 / 5.00 (2007)

ACHASM and Workshops: 3.09 / 5.00 (2010)

© 2011 Prof JJ Smallwood

Research – Findings (3)

Table 1A: Length of H&S specifications provided to respondents (GCs: 2007)

Category Response per range of number of pages (%)

Unsure 1-5 6-10 11-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 > 51

Shortest 9.1 54.5 9.1 27.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Average 0.0 0.0 9.1 63.6 18.2 0.0 9.1 0.0

Longest 9.1 0.0 0.0 9.1 9.1 18.2 18.2 36.4

© 2011 Prof JJ Smallwood

Category Response per range of number of pages (%)

Unsure 1-5 6-10 11-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 > 51

Shortest 27.3 18.2 9.1 36.4 0.0 9.1 0.0 0.0

Average 9.1 0.0 9.1 18.2 36.4 9.1 18.2 0.0

Longest 9.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.3 9.1 18.2 36.4

Category Response per range of number of pages (%)

Unsure 1-5 6-10 11-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 > 51

Shortest 27.0 25.7 16.2 16.2 10.8 0.0 2.7 1.3

Average 27.0 5.4 12.2 10.8 21.6 14.9 5.4 2.7

Longest 26.7 1.3 4.0 6.7 10.7 5.3 20.0 25.3

Table 1B: Length of H&S specifications provided to respondents (ACHASM: 2010)

Table 1C: Length of H&S specifications provided to respondents (Workshops: 2010)

Research – Findings (4)

Table 2: Extent to which various aspects / issues are addressed in H&S specifications (Part A) (2010).

© 2011 Prof JJ Smallwood

Aspects / Issues ACHASM Workshops Mean

MS Rank MS Rank MS Rank

Existing services e.g. high voltage cables 2.92 5 3.82 1 3.37 1

H&S file e.g. format & frequency of amendment 3.00 3 3.62 3 3.31 2

Client restrictions e.g. traffic 3.00 2 3.52 4 3.26 3

Client’s activities e.g. sewerage works 3.15 1 3.30 11 3.23 4

Client specific requirements e.g. daily removal of rubbish /

waste & security cards 2.92 4 3.47 5 3.20 5

Health hazards e.g. sewerage works 2.92 6 3.46 6 3.19 6

Client specific H&S requirements e.g. permit to work

procedure 2.69 9 3.65 2 3.17 7

Materials containing hazardous chemical substances

(HCSs) 2.92 7 3.38 10 3.15 8

Research – Findings (5)

Table 2: Extent to which various aspects / issues are addressed in H&S specifications (Part B) (2010).

© 2011 Prof JJ Smallwood

Aspects / Issues ACHASM Workshops Mean

MS Rank MS Rank MS Rank

Project location details e.g. adjoining structures or

geographical features 2.75 8 3.39 8 3.07 9

Hazardous processes e.g. bush-hammering concrete 2.62 10 3.13 13 2.88 10

Environmental hazards e.g. contaminated ground 2.31 14 3.39 9 2.85 11

Heavy materials e.g. blocks & precast concrete kerb

sections 2.54 11 3.11 14 2.83 12

Details of existing structures e.g. fragile materials 2.23 15 3.41 7 2.82 13

‘Designer’ design & construction method statement e.g.

reference to temporary works required 2.42 13 3.11 15 2.77 14

Design principles & assumptions e.g. stages of instability 2.45 12 2.84 16 2.65 15

Permissible design loadings for stages of structures 2.00 17 3.16 12 2.58 16

Geotechnical reports 2.11 16 2.83 17 2.47 17

Research – Findings (5)

Table 3: Extent to which respondents concur with various H&S specification related statements (2010).

© 2011 Prof JJ Smallwood

Aspects / Issues ACHASM Workshops Mean

MS Rank MS Rank MS Rank

H&S specifications should be a useful reference 4.77 1 4.48 1 4.63 1

H&S specifications are a useful form of reference 4.23 4 3.95 2 4.09 2

Designers are incapable of compiling H&S specifications 4.31 3 3.05 7 3.68 3

Project managers are incapable of compiling H&S

specifications 4.38 2 2.95 8 3.67 4

H&S specifications are a ‘regurgitation’ of the Construction

Regulations 3.58 6 3.49 3 3.54 5

Clients are incapable of compiling H&S specifications 3.85 5 3.13 6 3.49 6

Contractors are expected to provide H&S plans when

inappropriate H&S specifications are provided 3.50 8 3.40 4 3.45 7

Contractors are expected to provide H&S plans when H&S

specifications are not provided 3.50 7 3.32 5 3.41 8

H&S consultants are incapable of compiling H&S

specifications 2.62 9 2.63 9 2.63 9

20

Sections

Project details

Client’s considerations and management requirements

Environmental restrictions and existing on-site risks

Significant design and construction hazards

H&S file

© 2003 Prof JJ Smallwood

21

Project details

Project location including:

Access e.g. Infrastructure such as railway routes and roads

Fauna and related e.g. crocodiles, malaria, and snakes

Services e.g. electricity, sewage, and water

Socio-economic issues such as crime, and vandalism

Weather e.g. precipitation, temperature, and wind

Other e.g. landmines

Project description

Phases and programme

Details of client, designers, and other consultants

Extent and location of existing records and plans

© 2003 Prof JJ Smallwood

22

Client’s considerations and management requirements

Structure and organisation – general including H&S

H&S goals for the project

H&S monitoring and review

Permit and authorisation requirements

Emergency procedures

Site rules and other restrictions on contractors, suppliers

and others e.g. access arrangements to those parts of

the site which continue to be used by the client, shift

work, night work, restricted hours

Mandatory client provided H&S training

Activities on or adjacent to the site during the works

Arrangements for liaison between parties

© 2003 Prof JJ Smallwood

23

Environmental restrictions and existing on-site risks

Safety hazards, including: Boundaries and access, including temporary access

Adjacent land uses

Existing storage of hazardous materials

Location of existing services – water, electricity, gas, etc.

Ground conditions e.g. geotechnical report

Existing structures – degree of stability, or fragile materials

Health hazards, including: Asbestos, including results of surveys

Existing storage of hazardous materials

Contaminated land, including results of surveys

Existing structures - hazardous materials e.g. asbestos containing

Health risks arising from client’s activities

© 2003 Prof JJ Smallwood

24

Significant design and construction hazards

Design assumptions and control measures e.g. design and

construction method statements – composite slabs, and

structural steel

Arrangements for co-ordination of on-going design work

and handling design changes e.g. Nominated

subcontractors’ shop drawings

Information on significant hazards identified during design

e.g. bush-hammered concrete

Materials requiring particular precautions e.g. heavy blocks,

and precast concrete kerbs

© 2003 Prof JJ Smallwood

25

‘As built’ drawings and plans

Design criteria e.g. design loadings

Potential hazards included in the structure

Construction methods and materials used

Record of hazardous processes e.g. removal of asbestos

containing materials (ACMs)

Equipment and maintenance facilities

Maintenance procedures and requirements

Manuals (operating and maintenance) for plant and

equipment

Location and nature of utilities and services

H&S file

© 2003 Prof JJ Smallwood

Conclusions (1)

The Construction Regulations are not explicit with respect to the nature and contents of the H&S specification – are implicit in that requirements of various regulations inform what ideally should be included

H&S specifications are marginally project specific and relatively lengthy, which implies that they could be more non-specific and more a regurgitation of the Construction Regulations. This conclusion is reinforced by the degree of concurrence relative to the statements: H&S specifications are a ‘regurgitation’ of the Construction

Regulations: 3.54 / 5.00 (2010) (4.00 / 5.00: 2007) Contractors are expected to provide H&S plans when

inappropriate H&S specifications are provided: 3.41 / 5.00 (4.18 / 5.00)

© 2007 Prof JJ Smallwood

Conclusions (2)

The origin of information included in H&S specifications is more client than designer based

Based upon the degree of concurrence relative to various statements, there is a lack of competence among clients, project managers, designers, and H&S consultants to compile H&S specifications

© 2007 Prof JJ Smallwood

Recommendations

The Construction Regulations should be amended such

that the nature and contents of H&S specifications is

scheduled i.e. explicit

The tertiary education of project managers, designers,

and quantity surveyors should address construction

H&S, and include a ‘designing for H&S’ module which

includes design risk management

The OH&S Inspectorate should conduct focused

inspections relative to H&S specifications and visit

design practices to determine the extent of design

hazard identification and risk assessment

© 2007 Prof JJ Smallwood

References (1)

Behm, M. 2006. An Analysis of Construction Accidents

from a Design Perspective, The Center to Protect

Workers’ Rights: Silver Spring.

Hecker, S. and Gambatese, J.A. 2003. Safety in Design:

A Proactive Approach to Construction Worker Safety

and Health, Applied Occupational and Environmental

Hygiene, 18(5), pp. 339-342.

International Labour Office (ILO). 1992. Safety and

health in construction. Geneva: ILO.

Republic of South Africa. 1993. Government Gazette No.

14918 Occupational Health and Safety Act. Pretoria.

Republic of South Africa. 2003. Government Gazette No

25207 Construction Regulations 2003. Pretoria.

© 2007 Prof JJ Smallwood

References (2)

Smallwood, J.J. 2007. The nature and contents of

health and safety (H&S) specifications, Proceedings of

The Second Built Environment Conference, Port

Elizabeth, 17-19 June, 337-349.

© 2011 Prof JJ Smallwood