Upper San Joaquin River Regional Flood Management Plan Regional Flood Protection
Health and flood plan
-
Upload
business-innovation-research-development -
Category
Technology
-
view
2.738 -
download
7
Transcript of Health and flood plan
SECTION I
PART A:
1-IIM MBA CNAM Project Consulting
P.B.S.P.B.S. PDPDFlood
ScenarioFlood
Scenario
Productdescription
choice
Productdescription
choice
MBAProducts
MBAProducts
OrganizationProducts
OrganizationProducts
(World Water Week 200, SIWI)
SolutionSolution
Content: Product Breakdown Structure (PBS)
PFDPFD
GS RADJOU
Amendment to previous slide
GOALS: HELP TO GENERATE MORE SOLUTIONS WITHIN THE SAME BREAKDOWN OF ASSETS.A RE-INGINEERING SOLUTION COMBINES 2 MAIN BRANCHES:LEFT BRANCH : ORGANIZATION PRODUCTS/SERVICESRIGHT BRANCH: MBA PRODUCTS/SERVICESI HAVE SUGGESTED THE COMBINED ORGANIZATION RESULTING OF FUSION OF 2 SINGLE ENTITIES (COMBINED, GROUPING OR INTEGRATION)SO, AFTER THE AMENDMENT IS MADE INSTEAD OF MBA PRODUCT REPLACED BY ORGANIZATION PRODUCTS.
GS RADJOU (MY OWN PROJECT MANAGEMENT IN DEALING WITH VARIOUS STYLES OF PROJECT MANGEMENT WORLWIDE; MY OWN MIX BETWEEN PMBOK, PRINCE 2, ITDG.... (05/04/2010)
2-Product Flow Description
ScenarioScenario
PBSPBS
ProductDescription
ProductDescription
ProductFlow
Diagram
ProductFlow
Diagram
SolutionSolution
ProductDescription
choices
ProductDescription
choices
GS Radjou
A2-INTRODUCTION
I-DEFINITIONS AND ANALYSIS
a)General definitionsStrategy:A set of tactics, consider the high strategy (politics) and low strategy (Policies). Also, a tactic can behigh or low. These are the operations in the supply chain management. Also, in some planning a lower level of the strategy can be the top level of the tactic.
Scenario: Production of rose tinted or apocalytic predictions (Ref.: Michel Godet, from anticipation to action, A handbook of strategic prospective, UNESCO Publishing, p.58 and « the future is multiple and several potential futures are possible… », p. 57)
An event: E. Borel definition, … { « abstract entity, whose characteristic is to happen (status =1) or not to happen --isolated event (status=0) »--p.59…}
Data:Raw Data from a supermarket check out counter can be processed and organizes to produce meanningful information such a the total unit of sales of…[Data:…331 Brite Dish Soap 1.29, 863 BL Hill Coffee 4.69, 113 Ginger Root .85…. 331 Brite Dish Soap 1.29…Information: Sales Region: Northwest, Store: superstore # 122, Item: 331, Description: Brite Dish Soap, Units Sold: 7156, YTD Sales: $9,231.24 (Kenneth Laudon, Management Information System
(MIS), Managing the Digital firm, Chapter 1, p.15)
Useful for deployment
Useful for starters
Useful for binary systems
Useful for societies
b)Water
H2O2
Water properties linked with the free electronic doublet
O--
H+ H+d+
d+
2d-
2d-O--
H+ H+
2d-
As a rule, project management goals are to induce changes in organizations, and because changes deal with ressources, processes and ouputs. It would be nicer to understand these forces that are shaping the present environment in order to take a rational decision (manage with full rational controls). For instance, if these ressources are water in all their contexts, an expertise in water would help. Similarly, if it is a business activity, some knowledge of Market theories (Michael Porter,...)would help to master the dynamic of changes in a rational way.
Embedding my project organization
GS RADJOUAddition: 05/04/2010
Basic box process
Process
inputs Ouputs
Feed-back
Very cybernetics way to organise matters and energies in all kind of organization. All, businesses are organized in that way in order to sustain production activities, product and services orientations whether results porientate or not.With a driver toppling the whole basic box (either the: chief, boss,...or committe). It at the base of the creative engineering and the knowledge of the interactive forces betwwen all these elements
GS RADJOU Addition: 05/04/2010
c)Samples of Time Bombs for the Sustainability Development
98%2%
Hazards
WaterscarcityWater
scarcity
No sanitation
No sanitation
NoSafe water
NoSafe water
33 11
3 3 billion individuals
Water Bornediseases
Water Bornediseases
80%diseases
80%diseases
AsiaAsia
4/5Water related
disasters
4/5Water related
disasters
20 secondChild +
20 secondChild +
Contaminatedwater
Contaminatedwater
DrougthDrougth FloodFlood
Water issuesWater issues
Energycrisis
Energycrisis
FoodcrisisFoodcrisis
Populationgrowth
Populationgrowth
EnvironmentDevelopmentEnvironmentDevelopment
Financialcrisis
Financialcrisis
ClimatechangeClimatechange
US/EU rest of the world
US/EU rest of the world
Few facts and dataFew facts and data
H20
SolidLiquidGas
Biodiversity
Biodiversity
CO2reduction
CO2reduction
US$US$Oil
crisisOil
crisis
War forWater ?War forWater ?
WashingtonConsensus
Water traded good
WashingtonConsensus
Water traded good
AsianDeltaAsianDelta
AfricaAfrica
CoastsCoasts
IslandsIslands
ArticArticGlobal
WarmingGlobal
Warming
e)Pareto Analysis (I)
FloodFlood
EarthquakeVolcanic eruptionTsunamiLandslideHurricaneSnow meltSurge Rain…..
EarthquakeVolcanic eruptionTsunamiLandslideHurricaneSnow meltSurge Rain…..
Interesting pointswith WAER project:
the waste water treatment during a disaster
Most disasters include a flood
d) Water need contexts in flood prone regions
Urban and rural zones/ Urban and rural zones/
DisasterDisaster
NaturalNaturalWARWAR
TechnologyTechnologyIndustrialIndustrial
OthersOthers
20 litres2 litres.2 litres.
? DisasterDisasterTechnologyTechnology
GeographyGeography
Humangeography
PhysicalgeographyPhysical
geography
Risk= asset x probability x vulnerability
f)Pareto analysis (II)
WaterWater
MalariaThyphoidPoisoningCholera
….
MalariaThyphoidPoisoningCholera
….
Interesting pointswith WAER project:
the vector disease reduction
Water the source of most of our diseases
g)Water needs in towns andfields in disaster zones
WATER AERO EMERGENCY RELIEF OR PROJECT WAER IS AWATER AERO EMERGENCY RELIEF OR PROJECT WAER IS AWATER SUPPLY FOR PEOPLE AT RISK OF FLOOD WATER SUPPLY FOR PEOPLE AT RISK OF FLOOD (AND A STRATEGY ACCESS TO FRESH WATER)(AND A STRATEGY ACCESS TO FRESH WATER)______________________________________________________________________________________
+It is a Project benchmarking as no corporates ever try before to +It is a Project benchmarking as no corporates ever try before to deliver fresh water from aircrafts through 2 oz pocket water purifier deliver fresh water from aircrafts through 2 oz pocket water purifier air drops over flooded lands by using drones, microlights,.... air drops over flooded lands by using drones, microlights,....
+It is in the right new thinking and the innovation proned by the UN+It is in the right new thinking and the innovation proned by the UNto reduce flood increases in a world of global warmingto reduce flood increases in a world of global warming
A3-GENERALITIES
a)Project sources
W orld C oF as h ion b u s in es s
P rod u c t ion on F orecas tL ean an d sp eed con cern s
A IRA irlin e m ea ls /d u ty free g ood s M an u fac tu re r
U s e o f as s em b ly w areh ou s e an d tro lliesT im e p lan com p u te r
P ro jec t R A N DU S A ir fo rc e
A s tra teg y ac c es s to b ases ...N eg o tia tion d rive rs
G lobal corporates
F lood c on c ep tW ate r s u p p ly M od e l
1 0 0 km d is ch arg e z on eP o llu t ion c on tro l
In d ica to rB as ic o f p rod u c tion
S o il w a te r In filtra t ion cap ac ityR ive r d isc h arg esD is c h arg e cu rves
H yd rog rap h
Science of Hydrology
P ers on a l exp erien c es
In te rn e t
S IW I
Others
S O U R C E SB u ild -u p
m ate ria ls fo r th e p ro jec t
b)Main business sources
World Co:-Business: Japanese women’s apparel retailer World Co Ltd (« World ») -President, Hidezo Teri, believes in speed and responsiveness for his business-Championing the SPARC, the Super –Production- Apparel Retail –Consumer- Satisfaction-Start with new Brands and monitor them, then improve the production system, -Insure coordination with planning, production, development and marketing, and allows each store keeping units (SKU) to make better production: lead-times and volumes-Importance of cost in the space (Real Estate): influencing the retailer organization: independant –stand alone stores-, shops in fashion malls –grouping of stores in a building, or shops within Department stores. Stores are targeting different kind customers, implying various brands (40)-Lead-time for replenishment (from the order to the delivery: 2 weeks-Design, produce and ship new products to the retail stores within 6 weeks-Interesting point: WORLD produces on forecasted demands. The reference store for the Forecast is Obermeyer (OberMeyer forecast method) –forecasts based on previous season, then through adaption with P-D-C-A and also the annual meeting in Japan. (OberMeyerVote meeting)-Dream project: cost cutting, reduction of inventory and the quality of the SPARC network
[Ref.: Dr Schallembaum IIM MBA CNAM, HavardBusiness Cases, Operation Management Case Book]
c)No waste Production Principle
Energy
Information
Products
Waste
RechargeReuseRetention
3R System
d) Sample of production on forecast
Water crisisunit
mangement
Water crisisunit
mangement
Predictionand outputs
Predictionand outputs
P-D-C-AP-D-C-AAnnualmeeting
Annualmeeting
Idea: nobody can manage water stocks, butif we know where water is in quantity and quality, we may be able to make something
Forecastlike the Ober
Meyer method
Raw material/
labor inspectorate
Raw material/
labor inspectorate
Lead-times,CommunicationManagementTransport
Start
Checkedforecasts
Waterlocations:
look-out pointBase, MIS)
Waterlocations:
look-out pointBase, MIS)
New deci-sion to pro-duce for nextyear forecast
HEAD-QUARTERS
Lead-times,CommunicationManagementTransport IFM
branchesIFM
branches Overseas
Verticalintegration
Verticalintegration
Outsourcing
Outsourcing
home
Foreign country
End
Lead-times,CommunicationManagementTransport
Lead-times,CommunicationManagementTransport
Needsand representation
GS RADJOU
e)Business source: CEMEX (dealing with changes: diversity & sustainability)
CEMEX: 98 years old Mexican multinational, Ready Mix Concrete and Cement, (based in Monterrey), 53 Plants around the World (including USA,…, Phillipines)
-Business characteristics: Cemex: concrete business asset intensive and of low efficiencywith umpredictable demands
-8000 grades of mixed concretes and forward them to 6 regional mixing plants, each with its own fleet of trucks.
-customer routinely changed ½ of their orders, sometimes only hours before delivery and it may be re-routed because of weather changes, trafic jams or problems with building permits, Cemex’phone lines were often jammed as customers, truckers and dispatchers tried to get orders strait…
-Boss: Laurenzo, Zambrano grand son of the founder.1985 implement IT in the business From no technology to the use of a build in system to link trucks with GPS to monitordispatchers for location, direction, speed of every vehicules.
-Customers, distributors and suppliers can use internet to place orders directly, check Shipment delivery times, and review payement records without having to telephoneA customer representative services (Source: Kenneth Laudon,
Management Information System)
Note: What is humanitarian is looking like CEMEX dealing with customer uncertainties
Criticisms on humanitarian actions for not being proactive, reacting to events, the lack of anticipatory mangement
The world of hazard management like the CEMEX business is fullOf sources of risks and uncertainties
WAER project is a possible model of fresh water delivery to manage these sources of uncertainties to the supply of fresh water during the flood
f)Today firm Management Information System
ManagementManagement
OrganizationOrganization
TechnologyTechnology
MISMIS Business solutionBusiness solution
Business challengesBusiness challengesDevelopfast fashionstrategy
Develop design and productionprocesses
Deploy inventoryreplesnishementprocess
(Source adaptation:Kenneth Laudon—MIS--)
Water Aero Emergency Relief Information System [Source adaptation: MIS]
EnvironmentEnvironmentCost cuttingEnergy savingJob creationCRS
Water infiltrationMalaria reductionWater truckingFlood peopleTheir expectations
Real time versus forecast (new: 10/06/2010)
Idea origin: development of i-pod → into i-pad allied with google earth make it a usefull tool for huanitarin actions on the disaster fields
I gave it is new name: open field virtual classrom (ofvc)It describes the life of a master of emergency at headquarters instructing or educating (perhaps simply a mean of the daily environment) staffs or citizens at very remote places -in these disaster zones – how to survive in the real time. There is no forecasts or predictions (this tool could be under construction) or software modelling , but all instructions are in real time.
g)Project Business Model
Watertrucking
Watertrucking
DroneDrone
CUSTOMER
BASE
CUSTOMER
BASE
CRMCRM
FloodEvent Water supply
Decoupling
More than one alternative to Water truckingData
baseDatabase
SchoolsSchools
HospitalsHospitals
BusinessesBusinesses
TouristsTourists
ArmiesArmies
HouseholdsHouseholds
disabling
enabling 2 oz PocketWater Purifier
2 oz PocketWater Purifier
GS RADJOU
h)Planning ressources (a conciliatory match betwen needs and supplies)
PlanningResources
PlanningResources
SpaceSpace
TimeTime CalendarCalendar
Assumptions on flood typesAssumptions on flood types
Classes ofactivities or standardWork ?
Classes ofactivities or standardWork ?
Coverageof the dark zones (uneasy to forecast)
Coverageof the dark zones (uneasy to forecast)Flood
increaseFloodincrease
Product Base Planning
Product Base Planning
Finish with tasks And allocate resources: Manpower per hoursFinish with tasks And allocate resources: Manpower per hours
MaterialsMaterialsGS RADJOU
i)Contacts linked with the projecti)Contacts linked with the project
List locations or contacts for specification (or other related documents) here for teamwork
SIWI or UN Contacts:
+ SIWI: Administration: [email protected]+ SIWI CEO: Anders Berntell, [email protected]+ Project Manager: [email protected]+ Dave trouba: www.who.int+ Joshia Paglia: [email protected] + Dr. Ahmadzai Husamuddin, Tel: + 46-8-698 1145, www.naturvardsverket.se+ Director of the Flood division (IFR HelpDesk): Avinash C. Tyagi+ Dyamashita: technician at WMO (Flood division)+ Joachim Saalmueller, Technical Support Unit, Helpdesk for Integrated Flood Management+ Follow the link: WMO homepage Integrated Flood ResourceIFR HelpDesk
various links: Flood policy and Flood measures in link with the project windows
Contacts Outside SIWIIBM Chief Technology Officer (Mr Williams)The Federal Emergency Management AssistanceUS Geology Dept (Flood Marketing and training division)US Rothchild Fondation for Education
Other various contacts
j)For more info: referenceMains1-Institute International of Management (IIM CNAM MBA)=>Lectures of MBA topics representing the real world of Corporate multinationals2-Stockholm Water International Institute (SIWI): =>World Water Making policy organization and my last participation in 2009 for the consulting project (SIWI Administration, communication officer Joshia Paglia: [email protected])3-World Meteorological Organization (WMO): =>about forecasts and better predictions (influence of lead-times), meeting in Costa Rica in 2006 NOAA, USAID and WMO and [email protected] (WMO Homepage)4-IFR HelpDesk (WMO/GWP Flood division): =>about IFR HelpDesk (Director C. Avanashi of the flood division or type directly on the internet « GS RADJOU » for my individual contribution with Dyamashita)5-Water subsidies and Water Human rights=>Collective participation in decision making process: SIWI Administration, Dr. Ahmadaza Husamuddin and UN expert on Water Human rightsIn additionFEMA (US Federal Emergency Management Assistance):=>I am registered in their database and I have regular contacts with the Flood assistance, adaptation and mitigations services. US Fed Geology Survey Department:=>Through their Marketing department, I learned about their flood softwareInternational Business Machine (IBM): =>Mr William, Chief Technology Officer, I shared through emails with the CFO a common vision of a water infrastructure service: IBM Water leadership, really.GreenBizz (Green Business):=>Organization that runs a Webmedia front runner in matter of discovery new entries in the world of green stewardship in all framework of activities
II-PROJECT COMMUNICATION
a)Project Media attention
Emotions and sadnessCountry crisisCrisis managementTime managementWeather and hydrologyPeople activitiesTaking decisionLooking for new horizonsDrowning peopleTerrorism….Business and investment
b)Data on Natural disasters2009: 55 millions people suffer severe stresses with disasters (Mr J. M. Jarraud, WMO PresidentRef: WMO website)
2008: -214 millions humans affected by natural disasters, -235 000 killed ones -Total Billing: $190 billions in damages -Disaster Costs increase since 1960 -Number of dead stabilized at: 200 000/year -United Nations warned to take specific actions since 2005, if not there is a risk to jeopardize development
A few disaster figures
International community tools against disasters
a) Sattelites:-give the alert (raise the alarm)-inform the rescuers of disater places-play a major role in dispatching the aids
b) Computers:-phenomenal speeds of the calulators help to deal with the need to treat huge flux of data. – (For instance Meteo France 2007, Net SX 6R, treats 2300 billions of operations per second.)
c) Sattelite network:-250 sattelites with tools to observe the Earth –up to 10 tools-
-d)Forecast improvement:-A 4 day forecast is equivalent to a 1 day forecast , 15 years ago
EnvironmentResearch« Le Monde,Special Science »,Nov-Dec 2009p-42
b)Project flood communication
DRINKING WATER SUPPLYAND
FLOOD PLAN
Project description in non technical terms
(Personal description from what is known through the media attention-probably, it is not too different from the real world of flood experiences)
When there is a flood, it can takes a long-time before the international community reacts, when it should act to supply water to people at risk of flood (for instance when an international assistance is possible).
Meanwhile, the death tolls increase. People dies not from the disaster itself , but the aftermath of the disaster by drinking contaminated water.
Also, the queueing of refugees on roads (land, sea and air) is a media attention and real with unexpected globalization movments where people participation is very low.
It is a case for humanitarian actions. Specifically through the light of UN policies to substitute faulty governments to supply assistance to their own citizens.
Description in non technical terms [From rejection factors to the engineering needs]
–Negative reasons–A lack of autonomy: in the community survival, but instead dependance and assistance –Due to the short term anticipation. Good flood plans should advocate for self-sufficiency,
reliance and independance. Not same causes imply same answers–Technical e.g. water trucking is disabled, infrastructures are out of order…–Political: conflicts, authorisations…–Legal proceedings: Orders (emergency evacuations, executive decret, Emergency
Alert Warnings…–Environmental: sand bags, walls are environmental uncompatible–Cultural: drones and water purifiers are technologies for everybody –developped or
emerging countries–Economy: drone: $30, pocket water purifier: $10–GDP: diseases and deaths reduce the country task force and revenues–International projects: in principle, some water project horizon lines are too long (it is
one option of the vicious cycle of the pover chain)–Displacement: increase of refugees during a disaster fleeing the flood zones –Urbanism: impervious surface and mass productions. Flat surfaces
Description of the project in non-technical termsI think, there is an analogy to be drawn with what François Careme, Programme Network and Energy Management Director at EDF-The French National Energy Company- when he said in Environment Research « Le Monde, Special Science », Nov-Dec 2009 p-41 the following points helping me to comment for debating of my project orientation,and, again by analogy. 1°-…« Recours grandissant aux énergies renouvelables pourraient conduire à un accroissement des perturbations du réseau Électrique »…Due to the fact that the wind flows are not continuous –wind is an intermediate energy, illimited but variable in flows- (I think it is correct, because networks may be compatible to a certain limit)
2°-….also, the text adds …« Germany is number one in the world for the electricity generated from wind mills-Decentralized production units-, but supplies are often disrupted. There is great disavantadge, when the wind falls down, the electrical power supply would be annuled if the germans did not introduce a kind of compensationIn the ways of more traditonal ways to produce electricity »…(I think it is correct, we are never sure when the windwill stop blowing-there are still a solution with batteries to stock energy, I suppose)
As I understood the text, german households proeminently –firstly- use electricity generated from soft supplies (not nuclear or oil electricity generated power supplies), then when there is a potential/real defiency in the soft supply sources, there aretops-up energy contributions by national more traditional centred energy firms -sourcing with hard energies.
The delivery of electricity needs match an in-ward process- orientation from the peripherial drives –mission unit organizations eg households, firms..- supplying its own electrical energy, and afterward if households/firms lack of electricity, there is anexternal assistance call made for more traditional sources, this time, I suppose, in charge of the German Federal State companies to deliver from and above the insufficiences
Description of the project in non-technical terms3°-The Programme Network and Energy Managing director at EDF added : « … in France electricity network architecture are heading only one way, as well as power supply framed
– I suppose EDF monopolistic (?) electricity state company, with all the good willing to advocate for decentralization cannot deliver on the promise of set a perfect network of self autonomous ways to produce electricity at decentralized scale levels – your own facility to produce your own electricity, with your own sources to my knowledge are still inexisting or not developped, today.
One reason is what the Progamme Network and Energy Managing director had suggested in the text eg. the bottlenecksof past energy infrastructure options, which would render uneasy decentralized electricity production units –thereforekeeping a more functional way to produce electricity in France (maybe not the case in Germany)
The other reason is about expenditures raising from diversification of sources -from the mission units. Theret would be a Cost to pay for the policy energy diversification. The energy fragmentations with no correlation with people needs. And again, the french Electricity society may end-up with the need to another kind of concentration or centralization.
My conclusion is,
« I think, France is a small country in size, with a small population with an influence based on the use of technological prowesses to produce electricity generated from traditional forms of energy – the dominant way is Nuclear energy, which shaped the network infrastructure and development options, reversely for germany withanother production option, which may be difficult to reverse because of the small size of the population, also. A centralized way to generate electricity matters for France –as a decentralized way for Germany. Now what direction for the futureof electrical networks, when addressing large scale organizations with significant population sizes.
In fact, as the Programme Network and Energy Managing Director at EDF is questionning, in « Le Monde »: … «Can we introduce a large Scale decentralized production? » …
Description of the project in non-technical termsMy project contribution tends to answer positively to the question of large scale organizations and I am taking to illustrate my debate on qualified flood organizations that have a long history of fighting floods.
I have already described in the project paper (ref.: Wateter needs in towns and fields in disasater zones) the case of America, with FEMA-the US Fedal Emergency Management Assistance and the State of California flood organization.There is an obvious relationship between weather and hydrology services linked to the nature of the commerceof weather and hydrology. NOAA –National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration- is in charge of this service and NOAA is a branch of the US Federal Dept of trade. I felt, coming from the media attention –Katarina or Mexico gulf hurricane predictions-, emergency trends tend to bea rather centralized oriented way to solve flood issues under control of FEMA.
The role model of the service and the Emergency infrastructures, options are probably attached to the particular characteristic of the population nature and the size, which FEMA is serving.
Now, comparing to Holland or Bangladesh, which have different flood strategies, I would qualified more adaptative and decentralized. They helped me in a way to illustrate my flood model partly for the emergency rescue builders witha participation approach focus on decentralized forecast production units, using firstly basic local resources beforeapplying to external assistance -as I felt more predictions need more acccess to data, in turn there is a need for moretraditional investment in hard material in order to capture these software needs (for the forecast simulation)
Instead - like Germany for electricity supply network (and also Bangladesh and/or Holland applying adaptation usingBasic networking, I have fancied much more a model of flood fighting based on decentralized unit of forecast productions –first.
I found these models more appropriate to international agenda and perhaps may avoid future bottlenecks in network Infrastructure –my viewpoint taking into account the experience of electricity supply network and energy source Diversification described in the text: « Environment Research, Le Monde special science, Nov-Dec 2009.
c)Floodplan –including drinking water supply- and Health plan
In principle, factors that favour diseases –germs- development are the hazards –physical, chemical and biological and their drivers:
For instance, factors that can fuse germ multiplications are:
-Water temperature,-Water pH and water contaminants-Germ types and behaviors (carriers and pests)-People hygiene and vaccines-People –including staffs- motivation and training-Architecture, design and urbanism of the environment-Health system performance (collectivity, private or hybrid)-Water physical appearance (cleanliness, turbidity, presence of soil)-Water flow speeds (speed up or slow down flows)-Water treatment and waste water treatment-Research & development on cross contaminations during floods-Price of medicaments and affordability during disasters-The hygiene laws, principles and guidelines and pervasions.......
-
A full projectPictureis aboutcorrectingall theseSource of risks
Project Sub-goals (i)
ULTIMATE (I):–Answer to a need: water treatment during a flood–Fresh water supply–More than one alternative to water trucking (in the WAER Project)
•+the Pocket Water Purifier [analogous to a pocket water waste treatment]
•+the shopping on-line and the retail infrastructures•+the flood detector network for short lead-times•+the look-out point network targets sensible flood places•+the assembly bases with the warehouses: analogous to a
market place- exchange zone.•+the 2 oz Pocket Water Purifier drops from aircrafts•+the ultimate automation business engineered system: inputs,
processes and outputs•+the water corne handy desalination unit (from the NGO Care)
Project Sub-goals (ii)
Utimate Goals (II):
The spate would be analogous to the US engineer Corps works. (Same spirit for civilian engineering organizations)
Strengthen the house an also, disease (Malaria) reduction
–« Spate engineering » helps to make water re-circulates (or prevents to go inside the house)
•+Scaffolding the house: modular scaffolds
•+Water pumping: mechanical pumps
•+Safety boats: pneumatic boats
•+Aqueduc leveling: bricks and mortar
•+Isolate the house: use of buoys filled with the flood water
•+Use of barges: dry feet points, sanitation space, emergency evacuation
•+Water canals: to channel flood flows or use for barges
•+Elevation points: preparadness and shelter
•+Raising houses: dry feet during the flood
•+Filtration fences: stop for the unwanted materials: trees, cars….
•+Elevation walls: defence
•+Digging pools: adaptation
•+Water Piping: drain, pollution control and dryer for disease reductions
•+Platforms and asembly bases: water purifier service either on land or at sea (or in the pond)
III-PROJECT PLANNING
a)Lab 1: Flood type influences [rather risk orientate](Severity, Influences on the people expectations, options and planning)
Flashfloods
Flashfloods
In few hourswith great Impact on the waterelevations
In few hourswith great Impact on the waterelevations
Riverfloods
Riverfloods
WaterFlowingout of the river banks
WaterFlowingout of the river banks
MonsoonMonsoon
Create greatDamages incase of flat/ coastal countries
Create greatDamages incase of flat/ coastal countries
MeltingsnowMelting
snow
Surprisinglyspecially withclimate changes
Surprisinglyspecially withclimate changes
Soilperviousness
Soilperviousness
Influenceof citiesandurbanism
Influenceof citiesandurbanism
TidalSea water
TidalSea water
Huge impactson the coastallines with possibilityto penetrate far inner lands
Huge impactson the coastallines with possibilityto penetrate far inner lands
Naturaldisasters
Naturaldisasters
Giant waves With a mega flood. Also, landslidesand hurricanes
Giant waves With a mega flood. Also, landslidesand hurricanes
Man madedisastersMan madedisasters
Landslideswars anddam ruptures
Landslideswars anddam ruptures
TsupolesWater droning….
Defences:WallsAbstracts….
Raising the house
The salvationcomes fromthe abilityto be above Flood water
GoingagainstWater,Which is a fluid
Mitigations:enforcementQuality,Planning…
Technicalpreventivemeasures toavoid the damages
Adaptations:Strategy,Waterscape,Digging…
Organizingthe spaceto live roomsfor water expansion
Politics, policiesand police
Land planning,Environmentalcontrols,Tree plantingevacuation orders…
SheltersRefugeesAppealsCompensationsInsurances….
Humanactivitiesto help
b)Lab 2: Flood type influences [rather spatial orientate]
Flood from the sea
The Sea
InlandfloodfromsurgeRain
waters
RiverFlood
Country Y
Country X
A river Waterelevationoutsidethe riverbedflash flood
Rain
Country Z
c)Lab 3: Flood Plan (Timing)(Ref.: project flowchart slides)
Base
Prototypepreparadness
Long-termPlanning(Policy, access to base)
FlexiblePlanning(strategy Deployment)
Instantplanning(operation)
-AdaptationStrategy-Long-termmitigation-
Water SupplyDuringflood
Within a year
(1day)3 daysWeek
15 days1 month3 months
Key symbols
Capacity building
Preparadness
Prototyping
operation
Flood detector
Look-out point
RFID
1 to 3years
MediumRangeplan
S3
S2
S1Long-term preparedness
Medium term preparedness
Emergency
Ref.: from the flowchart
Preparedness cycles
S1:Preparadness Long-term
S2:Preparedness Medium term
S3: Emergency
Capacity building
Need analysisAnd engineering
Sampling
Activation
Production
Tests
MANDATE
Forecast
25 days-to 4 months
60’
72 hours
Tasks and timing of the mission works
Engineering works adapted to the sufferer needs-types of contractual agreements with the customers
1-All engineering works-all around the year2-Weekly works-emergency rescue3-Holidays works-individual household or small communities with possibility of discounted prices4-Dream works to cater customer needs-all phases of the project Lists of tasks:
T1: MIS implementationT2: Warning Alarm/alert communicationT3: Process for membershipT4: Flood surveillanceT5: Flood reporting and communicationT6: translationT7: Business and tradeT8: Preparedness for the emergencyT9: Call centre, Webdesk and Telephone alertT10: kid preparedness
e)Lab 5: Mission plans
Mon TueWen
Thu Fri Sat Sun
W1 1 day
W2
W3
W4
W5
3 days 5 days
7 days
15 days
IV-SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
a)Sustainable Development (SD)
SD
Brundtland MDGs IWRMCopenhagenKyoto, Rio,
JohannesburgAgenda 21 Decisions
b)Lab 1: Brundtland Commission and Millenium Development Goals
Mrs Gro Harlem Brundtland (formerly WHO Chairwoman)+Deterioration of human habitat+Our common futur+Long-term perpective for development (>2000)+UN Resolution: A/RES/38/161 +(UN GA 1983, prepares the commission)
Brundtland Report: full version, it is about sustainable developmentand the policy change engagement for achievement, a Centre for the World balance) --Report accepted in A/Res/42/187--.
MDGs: 1, 7, 8
[Ref.: Wikipedia]
c)Lab 2: UN-Water and the concept of Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM)
a spur
a mountain crest
a river course+
++
++
+ a sea
a delta
a villagehouse
a reef(or an artificial island)
a lake
IWRM
a road
Scenario case: 1 river basin=1 IWRM(Influence zone on the life of the community around theRiver. Comprehensive changes occurs in a package of solutions that harmonize/integrate the whole river basin activities.
d)The same concept applies in flood management( Integrated Flood Management --IFM)
Sea rises
Spurs
+
+
++
+
Water penetrations into the land
Mountains
Village(Houses)
IFM
IWRM IFM
Flood
e)Sustainable development - taking decisions-
Cultural valuesCultural values
Freediscussion
Freediscussion
Clear decisonClear decison
Full support
Full support
Newchoice
ContractualAgreement
(laws)
ContractualAgreement
(laws)
Conflictzone
Conflictzone
Individual(Market)Individual(Market)
DEPENDANCE
INDEPEDANCE
More or less….Source: High Output Management
Agenda 21
V-ADAPTATION STRATEGIES
a)Lab 1: Living with floods (Waterscape orientations)
Putting people over flood waters at all times
Leaving waterto its naturalexpansion
river
Rooms for expansion
PoolsCanalsParks
Tunnels
Artificial riversDrainsRefill aquifers
-Islands-Boats-Shelter-Dry feets-Elevationhouses…
New architecturesTowerCathedralWater castleLight housesScaffoldersPlatformsSky scrapers….
debordement
Water is a fluid, when it is blocked, water comes somewhere where it is unexpected..
Creating Dry feetconditions
PART B
I-THE FLOOD SCIENCE TO BACK-UP THE DETECTORS (sensors)
a)Lab 1: The flood concept (Source: WMO flood programme)
The rainRun-offs
Pollutions
FloodsSediments
The land
The riverThe Sea
[Source adaptation: WMO Flood program]
FLOOD IS GOOD FLOOD AND/OR BAD
b)Lab 2- Measuring run-offs and forecasting: -the hydrograph-
Discharge curve
Flow (cfs: cubic feet second)2,400
0Time (Days)
Peak of the discharge(for a strench of a river)
6
Type II 24-hrRainfall=5.20’’Runoff Area=768.000 acRunoff Volume=167.195 afRunoff Depth > 2.61’’Tc=20.0minCN=75
[Source adaptation: EROSION CONTROLUS WATER SURVEY]
A sample of simulation for IFMA1 (Pond 3) -See slide in project WBS for explanation-
Pond 2
Pond 1
Pond 3
AnalogySystem:pond collectors
c)Lab 3-The soil water infiltration capacity(« The flood laws »)
Transmission zones
Wetling front soil with Antecedent water context
Saturated zones
Water supply to soil surfaces
Theoritical zonation
fo
tofc
tcInfiltration Capacity
Maximum of water
Time
Decline of infiltration capacityDuring rainfall events
(Sources: Joseph Holden-(J.H.)John Anthony Allan (J.A.A.), ILEA,SIWI)
Impervious surfaces due to:-urbanism,-no adaptation-unfunctional waste treatment-no trees…..
Soil structure:Cracks in the soilSoil moisturesSoil textureSoil compaction….
100km
(J.H.)
(J.A.A.)(ILEA)
(SIWI)
d)Lab 4: The project reporting reference: -World Water Week 2009-
Natural water features(Naturally contaminated)
100km
Look-out pointBest placeswere a watch personcan contemplate a floodDirectly –no technology-or with the floodindicator.
Boundary land/water feature
[More flood Indicators (sensors) in the 100 km Where the likelyhood of flood is important(Balancing act between benefits, costs for risks)]
100 kmboundary
A water feature(river, lake,...,sea)
The pollution risk area on land
Sensors on the ground help to map theseAdvance of the flood front and assess location and speeds (See slide on flood detector map forthe redeploiement strategy of flood stations
Source: World Water Week 2009
Uncertainty distance for hazards due to water flows either at subsurfaces or underground infiltrations
Sensors
Hazard Early Warning System
Source
Issue
Detection
e)Lab 5-Flood crisis monitor - 100km risk zone -
100km
Run-off curve(normal)
crisis
Return to base line(Statistics)
Aquifer
Flood
PreventionMitigationAdaptationEngineeringWorks,maintenance
(Time)
Distances
Drone flightdistances
June NovJan
0 km
SeaOther networks
Hh
Dischargelines
Flood Predicitions from forecasts
(International Organizations, Weather forecasts)
WAER Flood predictions(Or WAER confirmed floodsThrough its own network)
Long lead-times
Short lead-times
Recommendation 1
WAERStand-by
WAERActivation
Risk run-off curve(deviation)
WMO, IHO, IMOOther networks
Legend
-WMO: WorldMeteorologicalOrganization-IHO: International Hydrology Organization-IMO International Maritime Organization-Hh : house location
100km line helps to find likelyhood flood locations installation of the look-out points
Validation ModelIn density population areas Drone activity + Business Model
[Ref: SIWI, adaptation ofWorld Water Week 2009Reporting-see the annex-]
Dec
Land
f)Ref.: Numbers of validations models behind the science from World Water Week
2009+The 100 km zonation from a water feature is significant for preventing pollution damages -Ref.: Swedish Enforcement Dept,
+The 2 oz Pocket Water Purifier deals with a high number of populations -Ref.:World Meteorological Organization, Flood Division, Technical Unit, in the authorization processto place my main project business component in the Integrated Flood ResourceManagement Helpdesk.
+The blue line is a monitor curve—a sample of flood water elevation with the period of the year—it is an expectation from forecasts, a contemplation of river feature water run-offs, synonymous of river discharges at certain points in time in the wonder world free of flood disasters.What should be if mitigations were perfect to avoid negative impacts occuring during a flood (deviation curve): loss of lives, destructions of properties and the livelihood, various casualties and injuries, deathtoll increases and disease spreads up to certain deaths…
+ The flood seasons: assumptions are based on the hurricane starts in June in the USA and ends in Nov-Dec --Ref.: World Bank i.e. worst Hurricane in Haiti ever was end of November 2008– and, the drougth period in Phillipines is between January and May of the year —Ref.: WMO and the dam discharges in the Phillipines.
h)Lab 7: Environmental significance of the 100 km boundary zone of water features
100 km boundary zones of water features are likely to be impacted more severely by pollutions.
Aquifer/sub-surface waters can travel far away enough from their original sources with good soil facilitation Factors: infiltration capacity, structures, perviousness and soil surfaces.
Floodwaters infiltrated into the land combines their pollutions with the ones carried by natural water courses during normal conditions. Loads of pollutants are: the soil unwanted materials, germs, others…
Flood events are the most common disaster (with thehighest predictability), still predictions are unreliable. For instance, if there is a strong rain, an earthquake, the municipality water supply disruption,…most places – except in places with serious flood indicators -- have no reliable flood plan and cannot control them. The pollution context in 100 km risk zone, add ambiguityto the cultural aspect of flood. For such reasons, the importance of good quality predictions has a higher significance in the 100 km .
Physical Chemical Biologocal
Typesof
Pollutions
GS RADJOU
i)Lab 8: important remark on the 100 km(flood is good, flood is bad)
Normally, the flood prone regions and floods are very relevant to the developmentof most country economies (GDP).
In principle, the soil natural sedimention process due to flood run-off waters contain the natural ingredients for the soil fertilization. It is a crucial/trivial cultural agreement/ingredient for flood sediment inputs for small or large farms (Ref.: FAO, UNDP, WMO…).
With the increase pressure of development drivers, pollutions with floods are complex and impacting traditional mode of productions. In the project, the flood water will never be as good as willing so, thus supply of fresh water sources are very likely to be contaminated by the fertilizers –and also, artificial pollutants-
The rational assumption is water supply unfit for the human consumption during a flood. And, if there is no evidence based policies that secondary sources are well mitigated, all waters in the flood prone region are perillous to drink.
The project business case is an alternative way to supply drinking water in emergency conditions. Thus, making the 100 km zonation irrelevant for drinking water.
II-PROJECT STRATEGY
a)Project strategy
THE IDEA IS A LEVERAGE SYSTEM THAT SPEEDS UP AND INTRODUCE SOME SHORT-CUTS INTO THE SUPPLY OF FRESH WATER DURING EXTREM WEATHER/HYDROLOGY CONDITIONS LIKE A HURRICANE, FLOODS…
Starting point of the strategy+ Rare are the cases when you can move people outside their cities during a flood predicted time. (because lead-times are always uncertain –nearly, and emergency evacuations when started are never 100% successfull at completion).+ The municipality water supply is disrupted and water trucking cannot go to deliver fresh water to citizen at risk of flood.+Harvesting water from wells or other water alternatives are impossible.+ We have to realize than nobody can stay without drinking over 3 days. People would not stand alone and refrain drinking dirty water.
Vision: World free of water poisoning during a flood.
Statements: reduction of death tolls and maalria reduction in the aftermath of the flood. Development based on mission organizations.
Missions:+More than one alternative to water trucking and emergency+Building green and the sustainable environment+facilitate the water flow through adaptative strategies+Use of modular scaffold to improve infrastructures
LOCAL BASE SIDE(DRONE)
FLOOD SIDE (IFM)
Retailing structureRetailing structure
Energy Power SupplyEnergy Power Supply
HouseholdsHouseholds
WAER
WATER AERO EMERGENCY RELIEF (WAER)
COUNTRY ASSISTANCE MODEL
Local
(Or Parcel deliveryOn-line Shopping)
2 ozPocket water purifier
b)Partnering for retail infrastructures & trade
Traditionalpurchase, supplyand delivery system
Capacity building(IF 1, NO 2)
Capacity building(IF 1, NO 2)
Order
Supply
Flooddetector
Assemblybase
Datacollection
MIS
MIS
Delivery
GS RADJOU
1
2RELIABILITYPRINCIPLE
LOCAL MANAGEMENTINFORMATION SYSTEM
HOUSEHOLDS
MISMISMISMIS
W.A.E.R.
MISMIS
BASE SIDE HOUSEHOLD SIDE
c)Plant partnering for flood information system
MIS:-Internet access-Computer-Mobile phone-Flood detector-RFID…
Existence of a MIScommunity
Capacity buildingCapacity building
Boundary
WAERACTIVATION
WAERACTIVATION
MISMIS
MISMIS
RETAILINGON-LINE SHOPPING
RETAILINGON-LINE SHOPPING
ENERGYPOWERSUPPLY
ENERGYPOWERSUPPLY
FLOOD SEASON
Households
d)Country activity break-down structures flood
Capacity buildingCapacity building
Flood Management Information System (FMIS)
MISMIS
boundary
Assistance cell Country cell
WAER INSTAND-BYWAER IN
STAND-BY
QUIET SITUATIONHOUSEHOLDS ARE NOT AT RISK OR THEFORECAST HAS NOTBEEN YET CONFIRMED
WATER TRUCKING
COMPARING NPV > 0 OF BOTH SYSTEMSCOMPARING NPV > 0 OF BOTH SYSTEMS
CHOICE ?
e)More than one alternative to supply fresh water
Drone
In principle, water trucking is disabled during a flood disaste and WAER is enabling the fresh water
In principle, water trucking is disabled during a flood disaste and WAER is enabling the fresh water
Capacity buildingCapacity building
AirIFMzones
waterDrone
Assembly base
Flooddetector
Parcel delivery
On-line shoping
Trade
Domestic
Spate
Treeplanting
Pipes(Soft, hard)
reservoir
ScaffoldsWater pumps
Houseelevation
Stone
AqueducLook-out
points
Forecast no detector
Walls
GPS
CameraPhone
RFID
Internet
Telecom.Depart.
Geography
Retailing
WAER MULTINATIONAL: MULTI PRODUCT/SERVICE BUSINESS BLOBAL CORPORATE, BUT NOT A CONGLOMERATE --ONLY ONE BUSINESS WATER SUPLLY DURING A FLOOD--
f) Firm organization Executive Board
Finance
Non executive board
International
ProjectTechnology
Orthodox
NonOrthodox
Disasterand hazards
Insurance Assessment
CSR HubTechnical
BargesCanals
Projectcomponents
III-PROJECT OPERATION
a)The basic of production
OperationalDrone ready
ManufacturingflowsManufacturingflows
SellingprocessSellingprocess
Inputs
ProgressProgress Drone assemble with water purifiersDrone assemble with water purifiers
PreprednessPrepredness
FloodFlood?
Alert confirmed
Pre-alert
Assembly Warehouse
DroneDrone Water purifierWater purifier
PreparednessPreparedness
Prediction(6-7 days) Prediction(6-7 days)
(60’ responsivenessIn day 0 of
the preparedness)
Assembly authorizedAssembly authorizedordersellingsellingprospectprospect
Drone Flights
2 oz pocket water purifier/ good quality drops
Flood identified zone
HouseholdsDrinking water
Water trucking disabled
Forecast (deliverable: weather bulletin)Forecast (deliverable: weather bulletin)
Production on forecast demandsProduction on forecast demands Control/Monitor zoneControl/Monitor zone
Deliverable(happy people)
A project starts with a deliverable and finisheswith a deliverable. Manufacturing flow is the project operation
Output
InputsMaterialsLaborsData
FloodMIS
Base
Look-outPoints(IFM) ‘flood
b)The Project Life Cycle(Preparedness and Emergency)
Projectstarts
Project ends
Meeting
Investmentdecision
Gas phase
R & D of the business system
+Flood forecasts+Flood mitigations+Scaffoldresistance+Lead-times+alternatives+project benchmarks+project funding+project equity
Decisions
Growth
Time
Birth date
developmentphase
Maturityphase
Deathphase
decayingphase
ascentphase
launchphase
NPV>0, project viability
Planning the project
Execution
Directingthe project
c)Project Product PLC 2 oz PocketWater Purifier
Modularscaffolds
ULM BalloonHelicopter
Drone
Delta wing
Assembly Launcher
Supports
Car ScooterBikeTruck Van RailsAircraftcarrier
Air dropproducts
Sea dropproducts
Canoe
Boat
Raft
Speedboat
Waterbike
Waterscooter
Localstores
On-lineshopping
Householdpurchase
Fresh water During a flood
Beforeflooding
Duringflooding
24 412 6 4Tracks n°
HydrocraftHoovercraftWater scooterWater cycle
d)Sustainable development (CSR&Change Management)
Initialstage
Indirect
Direct
old
Combining system(reliance on both for a while)
new
Transitoryperiod
Finalchoice
Business Engineering Systemthat could match environment and regulation for changes
constraints
Time
Help toUnderstandThe choice Of the technologyLinked withThe sustainability developmentEconomy, society and the environment
Firmchoices
T-2 T-1 T-0
c’’
c<c’<c’’
c’
c
e)The building a flood process
DataCentres
DataCentres
UNDPUNDP
FloodzonesFloodzones
SustainableWorld
SustainableWorld
NationalGovernments
NationalGovernments
SpatesSpates
UNUN
UN-Habitat
UN-Habitat
Centre for the World Balance: focus on flood zones
ABSABS
SECTION II
PART A:
A1-MANDATE
a)Ref case: Haiti, Nov 2008 –Worst flood in a century ever- Worldbank grants/IDA financing the recovery
b)WAER Project Mandate (1) (PROJECT BASE LINE BUDGET FOR THE FIRST YEAR IN OPERATION)
0
1
2
3
4
5
1stQtr
2ndQtr
3rdQtr
4thQtr
InvestmentReserve
Project estimate for the first year is a projected amount based on the number of water related disaters. This is the base-line budget for the initial investment during the 1rst year for the 10.000 « base-vies » also called segements, bases or platforms and look-out points. These contain the following components: drones, 2 oz water purifiers and the daily overheads and costs for running the project (items).Cost of 2 oz water purifier: $10Cost of a drone: $30
Revenues in multiple of 250 million
(Source: Sample estimate based on multinational earnings. For instance, Walmart 2 first quaters net profit in 2009Equalled $1.5 billion
c)WAER Project Mandate (2)
-Millenium Development Goals (MDGs)-Based science-Sustainable development-Environmental change-Energy conservation-Bio-diversity-Job creations-Innovation-Crisis integration: finance and disaster-Park development: flood zone, planting trees and clean water-Geneva zones: flood zone improvement for protection of women and kids-Partnerships-Task force: EAP (Eastern Europe, Caucasus and central Asia (Note in EUWI EU Water Initiative)-Tax, trade and transfer.….
A2-PROJECT SCOPE MANAGEMENT
I-PROJECT DEFINITION
a)People needs (1)
Psychology
Security/safety
Society
Self-Esteem
ActualizationOld theoriesbased on fearsfrom bottom-upto top downfxplains peopleneeds and driversof our behavioralmotivations
Modern theories explainthere is no only one unique way into the need Pyramid.It is illustrated with lots examples in life: money, water…
b)People needs (2)+It is an engineering need: it is about the component one would need to ensure the project success. It is going beyond the 2 oz pocket water purifier only (single project).
+In order to drink water. Users may need the water purifier--of course– but firstly, before drinking the water, one should ensure, the household is not drowning, for instance the flood sufferer has a senior house. It does not crumble with the flood flow.
+The 2 oz Pocket Water Purifier is directing the project (cut people thirst within 72 hours of the flood arrival time and refraining people to drink dirty water within this period of time). +Also, how do you market the need….It is the Portofolio project management that would answer this question in the WAER project. So, there are lots of business components –products and services- to satisfy fresh water supply needs.
My favorite solutions are on next slide and they are composing the ultimate goal of the WAER project
Water needs in town and field during a flood. Engineering needs required :
A-single project: drop of pocket water purifiers to cut people thirst in a safe way.
B-Portofolio project: it may not be enough to ensure that people do get access to fresh water, WAER needs to contribute more than just drops to help: ensure people are safe ideally look after maturity of their houses (senior houses) and the presence of an MIS for communication purpose. Pocket water purifier drops still required during the emergency.
c)The business case
d)The project goals
Ensure: self-sufficience reliance and independancewhen facing flood adversities based on the sustainable strategies.
Also, achievement of the MDG and the buildingof a new urbanism (the adaptation strategies and the mitigations) cooping with flood in the 21rstcentury.
e)The projects of various organizations
Deliverables
Forecast Networks
IFR
HelpDesk
Bases
Look-out points
Demand forAssistance
Providers of Flood products and Services
The FloodPlatform
WAERPROJECT
FLOODDIVISION
WMO Weather/Hydrology
FORECASTS(Bulletins,…)
Assumption: easy distinction, but not so strict, as all of them needs each others: evidence based: global changes; environment, finance,…
NOAA is a branchOf the US Dept of commerce
WMO: provider of weather/hydrology services to individuals/ businesses
Project components:
II-PROJECT PRODUCT MANAGEMENT
c)Deliverables
Weather/Hydrologydeliverables
Weather/Hydrologydeliverables
Bulletins
Outlooks
Warnings
Forecasts
Country ExecutiveOrganization deliverables
Country ExecutiveOrganization deliverables
Country presidentspeech
Federal states executive orders
Emergency Evacuation orders
UN/UN relatedOrganisations resolutions
UN/UN relatedOrganisations resolutions
Peace keepingforcesMINUTASH
Appeals
Various deliverablesduring a water hazardVarious deliverablesduring a water hazard
(Source: internet)
ConstructionConstruction
UtilityPermit
People participation(prospectives, contacts,
partnerships)
People participation(prospectives, contacts,
partnerships)
UNUN FirmsFirmsFondationFondationOthersOthers
WMOFlood
division
WMOFlood
division
UNDPUNDPWorld BankWorld Bank
US Federal Governments
US Federal Governments
IBMWater
IBMWater
RockyfellerEducationRockyfellerEducation
FEMAFEMAGeologySurveyGeologySurvey
SIWISIWI
IIMMBA
CNAM
IIMMBA
CNAM
PoleEmploiCadres
PoleEmploiCadres
Including: 2 oz Pocket Water purifier and Technology Pole against tsunamis
WHOWHO
d)Mailing list from my own network
ITDGITDGU.K.Taxes
U.K.Taxes
AbbeybankAbbeybank
FriendsFriends
Starting from (The tsunami* in South East Asia– December 26th, 2004)
Like a flood, a tsunami is a giant wave witha mega flood. I have already described, in various papers, a technology against tsunamies(Ref.: SIWI 2007-08 and CNAM University and the following contacts)
PART B
I-PRODUCT BASE PLANNING
a)Product Base Planning
ProductBase
Planning
ProductBreakdownStructures
WorkBreakdownStructures
FlowDiagram
b)Lab 1: Project Product for Break Down Structures (P.B.S.)
DronesDrones
2 oz PocketWater Purifier
2 oz PocketWater Purifier
Flood detectors
Flood detectors
Assembly bases
Assembly bases
M.I.S. M.I.S.
P.B.S. (Main components)
P.B.S. (Main components)
Look-out points
Look-out points
Retails andOn-line shopping
Retails andOn-line shopping
ElectroMechanical
ElectroMechanical
NuclearNuclear GaugingGauging SpeedSpeedSelfSelf FalseFalseDryfeetDryfeet
c)Lab 2: PBS definitions
d)Project P.B.S. types
PBS
Single Intermediate
Integration Grouping2 oz Pocket
water purifierTyphoon season
Planting treesWater aerator
machine
Water droningSupply chain
Flood detectionnetwork
Households’ Flood Information System
Strategy access to bases
Detectionbuoys
Flood detectors
Flood data stations
Drone launchers
Mobile phonecamera
Internet(landline, wi-fi)
Retail infrastructure/trade capacity
CivilianFlood platforms
e)Single project
It is called single project because the project it-self cannot be breakdown further
The business system engineering of the project is about supplying fresh water during a flood:
+either directly through the use of the 2 oz pocket water purifier,
+or indirectly, in addition flying objects (drones, helicopters, balloons, Ultra light motorized, wings…) will support the delivery. --Also, speed boats in the case accessing to flood zone is through river corridors-- of the 2 oz Pocket Water Purifiers to users.
Still, the main product remains 2 oz pocket water purifier, which can be found at the local store, on-line shopping before the flood predicted arrival time, or with the drone Delivered during emergnecy situations (flash floods, hurricanes, unpredictable floods….
A sample of practice for the flood preparadness if the house can crumble under the flood: water reserve and food for 3 days, a secure safety boat for the emergency evacuation,safety blankets to keep warm, safety belt, plastic sheet to protect the boat against the rain water inflitration, a pot to clear the excess water from the boat, a rope to tighten the Boat to a fix point…--non exhaustive list--
f)Integration
g)Grouping
II-PBS & GLOBAL ARCHITECTURE2-OZ POCKET WATER PURIFIER
a)Lab 1: PBS- 2oz Pocket Water Purifier-
H2OH2O
BacteriaA
BacteriaA
BacteriaD
BacteriaD
BacteriaB
BacteriaB
BacteriaC
BacteriaC
(Global Architecture and Specification)
Plastic case
Active part
Hazardous water side
User’s mouth side
ManufacturerClaims
Claim 1Claim 2Claim 3Claim 4
Digesting process
Water waste treatment principle
Water hazardseats
Legend:Bacteria eats
eats eats eats
Hazards
Bacteria D- eats Bacteria C -eats Bacteria B -eats Bacteria A- eats hazards
BacteriaLevels
Level A Level B Level C Level D
Single Project
b)Performance: 2oz Pocket Water Purifier(Interface specification)
Flood water
2oz Pocket water purifierSufferercan’t refrainto drinkdirty waterDuring 72 hours
This time the water purifier saved his lifeThe water purifier helped him to re-discover the loss water quality.
The 2oz pocket water purifierPlaced on the water cycle, as it is cleaningThe water, it is a real pocket waste treatment during the flood
Clouds
c)Drinking water supply-Water Safety Health Plan(Global architecture)
(Source: WHO internet)Water
ResourceAnd sources
Treatment
DrinkingSystem
Consumersystem
Structureassessment
MonitoringManagement
communication
All these components are in WAER project
2 oz Pocket Water Purifier
Watersources
Drinkingsystem
treatment
Consumersystem
III-PBS: THE DRONES
Drone base definitionAn effective drone base equals:Compulsory items (flood data measures are outsourced)
-Item 1: a drone launch pad : a small size real estate, vehicule or vessel equippedwith a drone launcher,
-Item 2: a warehouse to shelter/keep water purifiers and basic recoding tools andThe drone operator dash board and computer and radio transmittor,
-Item 3: the flood station to send flood signals captured by the flood detectors, Transmitted by long distance RFID in order to activate the drone launches
Additional-Item 4: the flood detector (flood data measures are insourced)Note 1: Flood detectors can be replaced by the look out points. These are special elevation features, artificials or natural equipped with RFID. Flood Detection means or an observator –flood watch person– could anticipate without technology the likelihood of a flood (forecast without technology)
Note 2: A base (grounded) can be replaced with a mobile vector (indirect for the water purifier: a truck, a car, a train, a boat for the droneLaunchers or indirect incase water purifiers are dropped from an helicopters or transported by shuttle or speed boats to households)
PBS for a drone(Easy one!)
(TerrainIdentification
EquipmentIn-board drone)
(Drone InboardGlobal positioning
System)
An OpticalFlux system
RealDrone
(it owns inboard navigational devices)
FalseDrone
(non autonomous)
Drone*(flying robot)
Drone*(flying robot)
*Also known as unmanned aircraft
(Ground floorRadio Control Equipment)
(Help ofoperatorsto assist
the flight)
IV-PBS & GLOBAL ARCHITECTURE: RIFD
(Easy one!)
a) A definition & history of the RFID
1-Definition
-RFID: Radio Frequency Identification. Also, synonymous of tagging.-Nano technologies (using radio wave frequencies)-For the:
->emission, ->transmittion and, ->detection of signals
The code bar is the simplest one -for identifying objects/carriers with RFID- (tagging) 2-History:
Code bar: use to track a mobile living being by emissions of radio waves (ref.: internet)Other places of randomization of code bar: items (fruit juices, cloths…) in stores are marked (identified) with RFID tags
3-Samples of RFID products
-Code bar –passive tagging--Ingecom RFID -Model IP 65 aquaproof
b) The tagging Principle
The carrier of the tag can be identify by:+the receiver (tag controller) during a transmission process. It is either passive if the bearer pass is just reflecting the tag controller identification signal. The bearer tag can be self power with its own identifcation (active tagging) and energy supply.
+mission box, active part have the same electronic performance and characteritics when supplying the radio waves.
c)Lab 1: the code bar PBS
d)Lab 2: the code bar- global architecture-
•Interface specifications•Tagging people or object: purpose: tracking device using
•Performance specifications•nano technologies; 2.45 GHz•Technology 0.18 micrometer CMOS with no energy •consumption nearly.• It helps the miniaturization and low power performance.•Cell life duration: 4 years
e) Lab 3: Ingecom product (product scope)INGECOM product, Controlleur Tag Actif 2.45 GHZ
trading firm: Nomadic solutions, 1015 rue du Marechal Juin –ZI Vaux le Penil, 77000 Melun
1-PBS
2 parts of the tag controller:
A fiix-active part e.g a transponder box emitting the radio wave recognition signal, and A mobile part is called the interrogator- e.g. a credit card or badge shape responding to the active part signal emission (identification) within the RFID electromagnetic environment
distance.
•2-Global architecture
•In fact, the transponder box is like a hotspot –analogous to the wi-fi pole for the internet waves –•It is radiating RFID waves in the surrounding environment. •Short distance RFID emissions are powered within a distance range of 30-50 meters.•Interrogator parts are not just reflecting the transponder –passive component- signal, but they •can produce their own identification signals –active interrogator-
f) Ingecom product -Detailed global architecture-
Performance specificationDim: 126x104x28 mm, alimentation: 5-12 V CD, 100mABandweight: (2.4GHZ-2.48GHZ, no licensing fees, international coverage)Temperature of utilization: between –10 and 55°C (In operation) and –40 and 70°C (storage temperature).
Interface specificationsHealth: limit to human exposure to electromagnetism field.Compatibility: WIFI, GSM, Bluetooh, DECT with no perturbationApplication: Tracking, medical use, animal tagging, detection networks, airports, hydroelectricity and nuslear power plants, supply chain, stock management, geo location, security.Current applications:chips, road tolls with no stops, park entrances…
g) Model IP65/aquaproof (product scope)RFID Model IP65/Aquaproof(active tagging):
1-PBS: Badge shape or credit card shape.
2-Performance specificationsDetection range: 30-50 metersCost: reduce and the size, also.
3-Interface specifications•Working environment•Works in highly constraint environment •(walls, metal, water,…, hostile waves).
[Ref: internet]
h)Long distance RFID
The use of screen antenae increases the power of transmission
i)Lab 2: RFID Global architecture Flood Management Information System
Long transmittance detector via RFID or cable or internet
The choices of linkage between a flood prone region and the households will depens on the type of Management Information System (MIS) and their connectivity with the environment.
Regulatory roles of national/government trade and telecom departments in facilitatingthe technology development to protect their citizens.
Anyway, I think such system efficiency would be based on:-wifi-telephone-access to bases-detector facilities-computer networks-television-RFID….
j)Household MIS/Flood Detection Network Service(Global architecture)
Mobile PhoneCamera
Mobile PhoneCamera
Flooddetector
Flooddetector
FloodbaseFloodbase
RFIDRFID
Socio-mediaevent
Socio-mediaevent
Waterquality
Waterquality
WaterspeedWaterspeed
Waterelevation
Waterelevation
TreamentTreament
InternetInternet
ComputerComputer
BroadbandBroadband
GPSGPS
VisualVisual datadata
Flood contextcapture
Flood contextcapture
FLOOD
FLOOD
Waterstation
Waterstation
DronebaseDronebase
HouseholdsHouseholds
Floodprocess
Floodprocess
World Meteorological Organization NetworkWeather and hydrology forecasts
RFIDhydrologyforecastNetworkservice
RFIDhydrologyforecastNetworkservice
Network powered with nanotechnologies, mobile phone cameras, internet, wi-fi and GPS for flood event captures/media
V-PBS: THE FLOOD DETECTOR
a)Lab 1: PBS - Flood Indicator Components-(Active parts)
Water flows
Rotating wheel
beam
A float
Waterascent
Float mobilizationUp-lift
Vertical rotating wheel configuration
b)PBS: Flood Indicator components (distal parts- (Cyclometer type)
Rotatingwheel
Detector mast (pole)
bottom
To top
beam
Side slopes
3.6m/s
mA
SpeedometerMode A
(Speed)Mode C
(Elevation)
Aluminiumpole
Cables
Also, wirelessConfiguration(RFID)
Floodheight
Sited in the house
environment
Cyclo computer
Internet
GPS
Mobile
Data centersx=vt
RFID
H (cm)
Mode B
(Time)
-Clock-Chrono
c)PBS: flood indicator components(Performance and interface specifications)
mastWheel
Stand
Solar Panel
Cell battery
RFID BoxFor signal transmittance
Floodcomputer
Power Cable
Data cable
Cell
-Speed-Elevation-time-location
WAER PLAN
Flood detectorConfigurationWith a solar panelA standAnd a vertical rotating wheel
Warning system
Flow
d)Lab 1: PBS - Flood Indicator, fixing ends and stands: various configurations-
Modular scaffolds
A rotating wheel -with palettes- movesup and down when the flood flow tides
Various configurationsfor the ground part of the
Detector mast
Mast (tube)
b) A stand shape for flat surfaces
a) Cone shape to (Pick the earth soil)
c) Nailingon a piece of wood
To a computerFor speed andWater elevationTransmittanceuses the RFID.
Wheel Palettes
Mast(or pole)
Configurationmanagement
Tide down
Tide up
e)New versions and configurationsfor the flood detectors
Emptytube
sectionwith
a ruler
bottom
To top
Float
Flood waterflows penetratinginside the tubethrough the window section lift a float.
The waterelevationin the tube canbe read manuallyor electronically
BallAscent
Increasing layersof water is an Indication of the floodarrival
Rulerstick
Ho
H2
Water ascent
Ground: initially without water
CalibratedStones with LightElectoluminescentDiods (LED) for flood night detections The disappearance
of the stone lightmeans that waterSubsurface reachedthe warning level
New configurations
New versions
H1
H2>H2>H1
New versions
f)Lab 3: New configuration of flood indicators
a water levelsubsurface
a float
a water feature bed°a fix
a variable lineWith the water elevation
a rising flag as an indicator shows the importance of the flood
safelow
highmedium
danger
Water tucking
Water droning
Flood
Tsunami
0
1
2
3
4
g)Flood Indicator
(New version)
Gamma source
Receptor
transmittance
Signaltransmission
Floodwater
h
Signal strength Linked to gammanumbers
New version
The dash linerepresents
the receptor support
Cable orRFID for long Transmitance Signals: N(t)
(Radio waves, RFID, internet, GPS..)
Geiger comptor principle: Detection of number impact N(t) = k (h) on the receptor is a variable of the flood water thicknesses (h)
To data centres for analysis,Forecasts andDecision making
PART C
C1- FLOOD STATION AND GLOBAL ARCHITECTURE
I-MISSION UNIT & NETWORK
b)Lab 2: Flood Indicator / global architecture(Interface specification)
FloodIndicator
House
RFID transmission30m-50m
Alimentation: Solar energy
FloodIn development
Sited inthe garden
Security zone (x)
PossibleSolution:WAER
Preparedness (needs) Emergency-Evacuation (needs)
x=v.tt=x/v
Solutionplanning
Hh
Hf
Hf-Hh= 30 to 50m
Datacaptures
c)Lab 3: House unit coordinates(Look-out points)
Dµ
H
O
d
H=dsinµD=dcosµTgµ=H/Dtgµ = sin µ/cosµ
[0<µ<90°]
House height
(Hh)
Hmax
D’
H’
H’Hmax = HHh = tgµ OD’ OD
_________
_____
Land
100kmFlood detector
h1
d)Lab 4: The flood detector and the slope influence
h2 h3H0=h0
HM
HmH
Risk areas
RM RmR
d0 d1 d2 d3
100% Safe
Conclusion: as long as the house isin the safety zones: no worry a bout floodwhatever the season. The house location is functionof the season: Hh > Hf and detector not too far fromThe house. 100km is relevant only if the soil is flat
HM: Maximum waterHm:Minimum waterH:Average water elevationHf:Flood elevationHh:House location
Di=hi, with i=1,2,3 houseLocation (hi) & detectorLocation (di) with 30-50Meters variation for the RFID
House100%secure
Boundary*100% safe
House at riskdependingon the floodwater elevationand the housemitigations:walls, piloti,fencing,…
Max. risk Min. riskAverage risk
d0:Flood calibration(Ref:point, GPS location)
water
Towerzone Piloti
house
New urbanism
Floatinghouse
100% safe
House mitigations
LowMediumHigh
*Except for flood prone regions
e)Lab 5: The extrem scenarios
Saint Michael Mount bay
Sea: water elevation at the speed of a horse (60 km/h)
Maximum risk house
Owner needsa perfect mitigationHimalayian mountains
Flood safe house
Water rises (8km/h) but the house is safebeing located on the mountain slope
No need of particularflood mitigations except building highIn the mountain
Out of reach house
The flood trajectory is not a strait line. The real –apparent- flood speed in direction and intensity combines various speed components to culminate to the horse race speed-60 km/h-
A sample of Speeds
walking10 km/hour
(average human walk)
Cycling20 km/hour
(flat road)
Tsunamy40km/hour (near the coast)
St Michael Mount60km/hour
(Horse race speed)
Escape road80km/hour
(From a hazard source)
Body or system Speed (average)
f)Lab 6: Flood Indicator locations(Global architecture)
Along a road(combines with lamp post
New version)
River bedCrossing aroad
(New version 2)
X=Water elevationµ:time to travel in the water
Laser or doppler
detection
Equation 22(d+x) = c[t+µ]
d: pole lengtht: time to travel in the air
Equation set 1D-d= XT=2 (t+µ)
c (or v): speed of light (or sound (doppler))T: measure between two signals
(d,t)
Signals1 2
TInterface specifications
In-houseFlood indicator
Outdoor flood detectors
(New version 1)Colorimetry
detection
(Computer reading in both cases)
Cable or RFID transmittance,Also sattelite detection with GPS
Flood
New versionsBased on light waves:1-the water colometry analysis(opto density: the waterthickness) is an indicator of the water depth-elevation- in some cases.2- Water elevationmeasures directly -telemetry-the water level
g)Lab 7: Risk drivers (a tool for assessment)(A sample of flood detection influences for
forecasts with very reduced lead-times and very fast response)
Discharge (flood elevation)
Terrainslopes
House location
Presence ofa detector
Time
Speed
Competitors:Increase lead-times
Use ofsoftware modelling
Competitors:Increase lead-times
Use ofsoftware modelling
1
Zone A: Importance of Discharge (6), detector Location (6) and time (ease to solve a floodissue)– easy zone
Slopes (2) and house location (2) are minorFlood speed likely to beMedium (3)
Discharge: water elevation, strengthLocation: proximity to the waterTime: influenced by the quality of the solution to flood ….
In this case it is risky:Flood risk and ruptureof water supply, vitalFor livelyhood and properties
flood detector location, senior house with piloti or mitigation. Preparedness foremergency evacuation/water supplyindividual food ration/safety boat
Causes
ProblemsImpacts
Zone:importanceof slopes only
House on a mountain (6.5). Itis not at risk-- if not the house is in a flood prone zone = likelihood of danger. For intance a house with a(1) indiceHouse highly perchedon the top of a valley slope
23
45
6
the driver indiceFor the event intensity
The driver type
6 6
5
2
2
For instance: case Zone D
h)Lab 8: Prediction horizon-lines
Long range
Short-term predictions
FORECASTS
6 months to
1 year
1, 2 and 3 years
5-6 years
1 day3 days5 days1 week
1 month
Functionorganization
Missionorganization
Weather
Hydrology
Medium range
II-FlOOD DETECTOR MAP
a)Lab 1: Level curves and flood indicator distribution: -the best scenario location-
profile A
profile B
HmHM
DetectorsLand sub-surface
profiles (topography)
100 km
H0
Plan
Profile curves
HoHo
Influence of 100 kmRecommendation zone River course
Good
WaterElevationAverage line
d0dm
d
Safety beam(100km)
Level curve(Profile A)
d’d’m
d’0
Projection
Terrain profile
0
[Ref.note: Spot satellite detection accuracy is 2.5 meters]
Profile B
b)Lab 2: PBS: The best location for a flood detector: In search of the look-out points
R+
R°
Level curveProfile A
Hh: house location
Hx+=Hx°+dxHy+=Hy°+dyHz+=Hz°+dz
d
µ100km
d0
Hh
dMdm
Hh
100 km safety range(Likelihood of a pollution
zone from a water feature)
Radar lecturesat various rangedistances of the waterelevations
oR°
HouseIn danger
Flood can be preventedif there isa flood detectorAnd/or mitigations
Flood increases and detections Give: speed, timeand distancewith RFID mapping
d0
dm
d
dM
Flood detectorsat various distances:H min, H int., H max
The frontline for therising flood water. Theinundation is between100 km and the d0Distance line.from the house insideThe 100 km zone
Flood frontline
detectors
d
C2-PROJECT EXTENSION
III-MODULAR SCAFFOLDS
Linkages between flood protections
(Personal projects)
Technology pole Against tsunami
Flood detectionmission organized
Giant floodsUp to 20 meters
Speed of the flood –Tsunamy-when crushing the coat line40 km/hour
Detection and warningten kilometers beforethe coastline. Emergencyevacuation –running fast- towards the Technology pole against tsunamies.
Protection system is a 15 minutesemergency preparedness to insumersiblesafety boats. In approach, they are analogous to those boats found. in Disneyland Parks or the Queen mary safety boats. Capacity: 50 people. The structure is totally covered and waterproof. Boats are attached –linked- to a very high poles (40 meters)-like those found in highways or football stadiums.The cable –like those used for jumping--are a mix of elastic cable with the propertyto amortize the crash between the tsunamywave and the tsunamy safety boat.
Flood stations for data communication with civilian protection units
Flood detectors based on the use of local resources at look-out points for floodf warning and forecasting coupledto the flood stations with RFID and personal technologies: internet wireless, the mobile phone camera….
The platdorm for water droning.modular scaffolds fixed/raising with the flood elevation.
Civilian protection can be extended by using the adap-tation strategies and re-organizing the flood spacewith buildings analogous towater castles, lighthouses,cathedral architectures, old market places as elevation points-dry feet assembly zones) for civilian protection against flood
I-Civilian protections against floods
PROJECT
PLATFORMCONCEPT
SCAFOLDING ARCHITECTURE/PIPES OF VARIOUS
SIZES AND STRUCTURES
FLOOD
Lab1:The Flood Platform: various scaffolds of different sizes
Scaffolds: pipes of differentSizes and diameters give moreVersatility to the flood architectureEither for strenghteneing a house of Building an instant waste treatment to drain water, or making drone launchers.
Modularscaffolds
Look-outpoints
Drone bases
Waterplatform
Housestrenghtener
Flooddetection
Launcher station
Floodprotection
House consolidation
Vertical scaffold
Horizontal Scaffold
(waste treatment-pipes)
Foundation
N
PIPES
CLIPS
Modular scaffolds (Quick fixing point)
Modular Scaffold (Versatile fixing point) -New configuration-
The build-up components for the new architecture –scaffolds and nail scaffolds-- in order to make the house resilient to the flood flow-.Also, modular scaffolds help to make instant elevation points (dry-feet zones) for an affordable price. Pieces of metallic tubes (scaffolds)fixed together or on the bed rock or the house, put people above the flood water like reffinery –oil- platforms
Metallic tube (scaffolds)The kneel (gripping part of the scaffold)
Scaffold nail
A hole in the kneelA ring with holes give360° flexibility toThe flood architecture
The scaffold nail into the kneel hole (ring)
achieve and maintain rigidity between scaffolds
And the flood body architecture
A Scaffold
5 m - 10 m
kneel
Attachs to fix points: walls, poles…
+
Supporting body (wall)
Scaffold(pipe)
screws
( Section view)
Scaffold(Axis)
(Profile view)
To the body architecture(the platform)
Bed rock
Scaffolds Liasing with the board
+
hooks
+
Horitonzal scaffold
Vertical scaffold
Hooks
+
Board
(Z)
(Z)
(Z’)
(Z’)
(H)(H’)
The flood platform for civilian protection
Space lived for flood flows
5m
10m
15m
Quick and affordable elevation Points in flood prone regions
Kneel and nails
Bed rock
A wall
Details in Slide 137
Scaffold branch
Details inSlide 138
Details of the grips
Raising Platform
House: elevation houseMini-base for the drones
Elevation pointsAssembly point Refuge-shelter
Look-out point WatchForecasts
Flood elevationFlood
Indicator for alternative Aids: WAER,Water trucking
LocalFlooddetector
RFID
GPSPole
Internet
GPS Drone+
Water purifier
computerMobile phone
USB key
Cloud technology
Optical Flux
Assembly Base
Surgerain
My answer:choice
The flood platform
Architecture for important floods– over 10 meters--
Goal: Rendering people more reliant, self-sufficient and independant.
Sub-goal 1:Completion of flood adaptation strategies (advocated by ILEA the dutch water architecture and others and various schools, which philosophy orientations are to leave water floods to their natural expansionsIn digging pools, raising houses/villages with flood tides, building on elevation points or using the fengshui philosophy instead of building walls
Sub-goal 2 :Keep a middle trend between adaptation strategies and raising villages in order to get dry feet points during an important flood by changing our representation of ancient buildings like urban/villages cathedrals/churches, water castles, lighthouses that are vanishing from the countryside landscape for more up to date technologies and organize them for new roles like safety buildings during important floods.(All these building are proeminent buildings, strong and big enough to be assembly building during a flood rescue at predicted arrival times.
New developments for the project (16/12/09) -Ref.: Jean Taricat, Histoires d’architecture, Dessin de Jacques Ziegler, Editions Parenthèses, p.48--
Divisions harmoniques d’un segment de droite
1/2 1/2
2/3 1/3
1/3 2/3
1/4 3/4
New developments for the project (16/12/09)-adaptation from:(Ref.: Jean Taricat, Histoires d’architecture, Dessin de Jacques
Ziegler, Editions Parenthèses, p.48)
Alberti, proportion de la loge Ruccelai (Florence)
d H=9d
Modular order: ideally the height is a multiple of the corresponding column diameter
kD
Dk=1,…,nn c N
Platform
d
kd
New developments for the project (16/12/09)(Adaptations from: Ref.: Jean Taricat, Histoires d’architecture, Dessin de
JacquesZiegler, Editions Parenthèses, p.80)
A
11 m A
A
A/2
A/2
A
22 m
B
B
1 2
3 4
5
6
8
7The dry feet platformAbove the flood waterAre towering like islandsSurrounding with coralReefs.
People will find a safe flood place at the top of high building like churches, cathedrals or ancient market Places. Thebuilding undernith allows water flows to circulate while The top stores (over the water play the role of sheltering floors. Connections between wings of various buildings canBe entirely with the use of Modular scaffolds. (analogous to ancient Market places. Note: whole safety zones could be built with modular scaffolds.
Civilian protection against flood:The water castle.
Water castle part(receiving humanes)During a flood
Water castle foot
Perhaps some castle could beEmpty from their naturalWater before the flood predicted Arrival. To shelter humans at risk of flood. It meansThat community castle would Have a system to pump outThe water before flood.
Stairs
Sheltering room: 50 people or more
Island development
Flood prone region
The flood water (innundation)
Safety island(dry feet zone)
river The Building of a canal isa trap for water
Little bridge
islandbridge
Canal(with more or lessa drain)
The light house tower
Flood subsurface
Lighthouse
Entrance door(under water
During the flood)
road
Water elevation
4 th floor window
C2-RISK IDENTIFICATION
I-RIVER DISCHARGE MODELS
a)Lab 1: Basic description of the river bed compartments
Land surface
River bed
rbs
H0
(average elevation)
River sectionH0 minH0 max
Land surface
Flow (m3/s) = river section x velocity= (H0) x (w) x (d)
Canal width (w)
river
1s
H0
wd
River bed rock
Riverchannel
strand
b)Lab 2: Hypothetical river regimes (discharges)
H0
H0 min
H0 max
Time
Elevation [H = E(t)]
Drougth season Wet season
annual mean
Jan- Dec-Calendar
Equatorial river discharge
Tropical river discharges
Flood line
June
E(t)
II-FLOOD DISCHARGE MODELS
a)Lab 1: The real work is on tHARhe flood line 90°-- Flood detectors located every 20km, at a specific time frequency gives: the flood water elevation. It is the vertical speed of the flood.
90°½ village
100km80km60km40km20km0km
river
H (elevation)
5m
2m2.5m
5m
1m
The flood average travel is 10km/h on line 90°. At 6 am, the flood frontline was at 40 km fromthe village. Flood elevation recorded at that time was 1 meters –local detection using the flood detectors.At 8 am, the flood frontline reached a lowest peak. It means the flood receeded during the Last 4 hours before reaching the village. Certainly it was a flash flood of 2 hours away from the village.
Detection 2
Detection1
0.5 m increasesbetween 100km80 km and
Assumption from previous slide Flood speed =10km/hFirst detection at 0 h 00 (6 hours trip) 0h006h00
Detection of the verticalflood speed
?
90°½ village
100km80km60km40km20km0km
river
6
12
18
b)Lab 2: The real work is on the flood line 90°--It is made by the flood detectors placed every 20km. Data
collected along the line gives the flood frontline distance and horizontal flood speed (the flood velocity)
0
24
Day hours
Case: Flood trip : 6 hours. Travel distance: 60 km (on line 90°)Average flood speed, S = 10 km/hour (at night) [60/6=10]Flood frontline: The flood is at 2 hours out of reach of the village.
First detectionat 0 hour
First detectionat 6 o clock
What is the flood status expectation in 2 hours or with a detector placed at 20 km from the village?
?
c)Monitor 1: Variance of the flood water level with time
-Ref.: average level of run-offs in the flood corridor)-
Hours
(Height)
1m
1h
2m
2.5m
5m
1m
Meter per hourVertical speed of the flood(Variance per hour)
4h 6h (Time)
d)Monitor 2 :Other representation of the flood elevation -at specific distance points-
0.5
With flood detectors spaced of 20 km, the organizationis measuring average results
2.5
4 m
Average water increaseBetween 2 measurements of 20Km(In principle every 2 hours)
100km
detection 2 increase
detection 3Increase
detection 4decrease
1m
80km60km40km20km+22+0.5=2.5+2.5+2.5=55-4.0=1
2m
Detection 1Increase
Variance per hour Multiply by 20km =>it is the tranche of debit if multiply bythe corridor aperture.
?
1
4
3
25
0km
>0
<0
+2.0+0.5+2.5+1.0+6.0-5.0
+1.0
-5.0
d1d2d3
d5?
d4Total
Data recorded Database fillings Forecasting
III-FLOODING MODELS
a)The link between sediments and flooding
Sediment processing over the river bed rock
The river water sediments travel down the river
Increase of the thickness of the sediment layerIncreasing layersof sedimentsinducing the
flooding portion
Volume of water over the sediments
The water lifted outside the river bed under the influence of the sediment layer formation
Level subsurface 1
Level subsurface 2
Before the sedimentprocess
After theSediment process
Water flowing downstream the river
b)Flooding due to canal sediments
The sediments in formationcreating the flooding portion
The flood portion in formation(rise up and eventually flooding)
River flowsDownwards
X
X’
P1 (flooding sediment –traceable layers)
P2 (After)
P1 (Before)
Accumulation of Sediment layers
c)The link between sediment layers and the flooding portions
Riverbed rock
Natural sedimentationof the river bed
The sediment top layer
Equilibrium 1 (Before the hydrolgy hazard)
Equilibrium 2(After the hydrology hazard)
XX’
T=t1T=t2
Y’2
Y2
Y’1
Y1
A2 (t2)
A1 (t1)
T: timeA: sediment layerF: flow (with the sediment)
The sediment top layerFlow 1
Flow 2
Water subsurface 2
Water subsurface 1
FlowstreamFlowstream
A1-A2- = H1+H2 2
H1 = F1+A1H2 = F2+A2F1 =/ F2F2 = F1+A2
d)Lab 3: Issues from Lab 2:. Overflow = run-off inflitration in excess of water infiltration
Initial flow volume
Excess (due to rain)
Flood zone
L70°
L115°
Villagelocation
00
20km
40km
60km
80kmFlood detectors
Run-off infiltrations in excess cannot be drained by the flood prone zone during flooding.
The local detectors are measuring the speeds and the elevations of an excess of water that cannot be drained bythe river canal and the split water from the canal spreads on the strand as run-off infiltrations in excess
+
Run-off infiltration in excess
Flooding portion
IV-THE FLOOD PORTION THEORY
a)Lab 1: The water flow mouvement (the flood portion model)
A
River bed
A Section of waterfrom the river
River flow(Q= m3./s)
Land surface
(B:b1, b2, b3)
Initial increase: Increase 1= B. It has 3 components (b1: speed, b2: elevation, b3 flow A section). It is less than the riverbed security (rbs) rbs – b2 = rbm (river bed margin) room left over before the flood starts. Flood starts if b2 > rbs
Second increase: increase 2 = C (C1, C2,C3). This time, b2+c2 > rbs and b2 = b’2 withb’2 = rbs (with b2 + b’2= rbs)
(rbs)
River canal
River bed margin (rbm)River bed security (rbs)
Flood portion
Debordement formula(rbs-rbm) +d= c+d
d
c
(1)
(2)
(3)
Equilibrium equationrbm = 0 when rb = rbs+a
Canal equationrb = A+rbs
b)The study of the flood portion model
Flood portion
Flowinginto land
Sediment layer obstructing the canal
V-THE WATER TRUCKING
a)Lab 6: Project Risk
Cause
Problem
Impact i
Impact jImpact n
….
(Warning:project risk case: a water hazard –a flood- with one cause and oneproblem only with various impacts)
b)Various causes for water trucks being disabled. Here, I selected a water infiltration source-flood-
Cause Pb
Pb
Pb
Cause
Cause
Variouscauses
Floodinfiltrations
DisabledWater trucking
Driverkilled ImpactImpact
Impact
Impact
Hazard
Multi-hazardeventHazard
Hazard
Looting
Lootingwater
Van stolen
Impact
Water
House scrambling
Sheltering
c)Problem: Disabled water trucking (and project product life cycle -PLC-)
H1
H2
TimeFlood condition requirement definition => H2 – H1 > h value at which water trucking Is not physically possible
h
Elevations
AverageRun-offline
AverageRun-offline
Project starts
Project ends
(Project life cycle)
Water trucking
DeviationincreasesWater
dischargecurve
Control1
Control2
-Monitor-Look-outPoints-Flood detector-RFID-MIS
Production zone Flood
Forecast
WMOLook-out points
Forecast before floodOn order during flood
>0Capacity building Manufacturing DropsPreparadness
Project operation
V-FLOOD DETECTIONS
Lab 1: Issue on the technological detections-Where to position the first flood detector?-
D2T=t
D1T=0
River
Average water rises between 2 detections
How long it takesThe water—water river)to be 2 m high(elevation 2m)
ImportanceOf the locationOf the first detectorTo inform about theReal water elevation in orderTo reduce the variance betweenThe real elevation and the average
Too closeTo the river
Laws on flood maybe sum up in:-the soil structure, and-the infiltration capacity.
2 cases: predictible and unpredictible floodPredictible:Look-out points, evidence based policies of the very likely placesWhere statistically the occurrence of robust floods are highly (In this case one should not leave in this area )
See statistics on standard deviation and risk (1 sigma, 2 sigma….)
Issue with the detection of the first flood: where and when the 0.5 meter water increase occurs, in between the 2 detections. [When does 0.5 meter added to 2 meters ?]--towards a simulation of the first water elevations, non-fixed discharge--
2m
Detection 1T=0.002.5m
Detection 2T=2.00
River
The real curveof the flood elevation:The Flood level increases
Average water levelsthrough 2 detections
at intervals of 2 hours
ExcessOf waterFrom the 1rst detection
Detection 1:Portion of riverflow that travelsinland and can createthe flood.
Issues:
What is the appropriate interval of time for 2 flood measurements? – Normally, the simulation of an hypothetical flood trip travel time between 2 detections allow the determination of the flood speed by the relation: x=vt, x being the trip distance travelled by the flood during the time (t).
In principle, the distance x is unknown until, it has been measured (or simulated).In our case, it is known when the flood detectors are put in the flood zone for Monitoring purpose.
In real works, the implementation of a distance indication with flood detectorspreceeds the speed measurement and also, the time delay measurement between 2 detections that suceed.
Note: Besides using technologies to record flood speeds, an experienced flood person--from the local environment presumably-- may be able to have a feeling for the flood speeds—as with various monitors, also-- and do the reverse operations to assess several flood parameters.— It is flood forecasting without technologies.
d)Flood portion as open system exchanging with the environment
Flooding portion
undergroundsoil
Bed rock
River bed rock
Flood occurs if the soil impervious to a certain extent (see slide 68: flood science and the soil water infiltration capacity)
Flood prone regions
canal wall
Sediments obstructing the canal
river channel
Sub-surface
Soil permeability( K)
Water movements in/out
K= kh (soil structure) + kv (infiltration capacity/perviousness)
e)Visualization of the run-off infiltration in excess(Horizontal Permeability/perviousness coeff. kh)
Flooding
Saturated zone
Transition zone
Impervious surface
Pervioussoil
Wetling front with antecedent water penetration
flood
Run-off infiltration in excess if too high it is creating a floodFlood risk: H-h > 0 (water trucking cannot go)
kv
kv: coefficient of perviousity (soil vertical permeability)
River canalSoil
h)Flood detectors are measuring 2 kinds of excessive waters (run-off waters in excess)
Transition SaturatedWet with
antecedent
Soil structure by a river stream(underground under-influence of the canal
with the permeability Kt )
River canal
in and outWater movements
Underground Water circulations
K: permeability coefficient, K=kv +kh, kv :vertical permeability--when there is the subsurface water that penetrate the soil sourced from the flood (if the surface is not impervious kv=0)kh: horizontal permeability due to infiltration cpacity depending of the soil structure –see slide 68-
kv
Natural river channel
i)River flow equations
River bed characteristic equationsrb = A (a1, a2, a3) +rbsrb = a +( b +rbm)rb= a + b + c (equilibrium equation with b+c= rbs)
Debordement formula(rbs-rbm) +d= c+d
Equilibrium equationrbm = 0 when rb = rbs+a
j)Lab 8: Departure detector (Dd)
river
Flood indicator (Dd)
A
B
Annual mean
rb-A-G = BA__
b= BA__
Gauging capacity
Detection(Indicator)
G
rb
Departure
Visual check(room left)
Flood portion
Where the first flood detector should be placed (Departure detector: Dd)?
k)Lab 9: Special cases for the inundation equation
Case 1rbs – rbm = 0 rbs = rbm-river bed of the canal is with the annual mean of water elevation
Case 2rbm – rbs < 0, river flows varied between the averageWater elevation and the maximum water elevation
l)Lab 10: Split Over Strand condition (SOS)
b2+c2+d2 > rbs split over strand (sos)
I have divided the space over the H0 in 3 parts:-One part related to variations within the standard deviations (part within the river bed security and such: c2 < rbm)-no debordement--The part that creates the flood within the rbm that does not split over (sos), when the equilibrium equation is satisfy (desequilibrium equation)The split over condition is validate (sos) for a d2 >0 -Part 3: the sliding part is when the rbs is reduced due to change in theWeather conditions, H varies within the standard deviation outside floodand the river bed security is reduced due to increases of H c [Hmin, Hmax] It is a factor affecting the flood severity
H0
b2
c2
d2
rbs
The Sliding theory
d2/rbs= [rb – H(t)]/rbs
rbm
d2
VI-FLOODING MODELS
a)Lab 1: Basic models for flooding
River bedrock = 0 (elevation)
[Maximum height of the river canal= rb (river bed)]
rb
knownCanalcharactristics
Sub-surface water (average: annual mean)H0
Notes:1- Index (0) in H(0) is for a specificRiver, it could be river 1, or river 2Etc…2-A means Sum Ai/ n (i=1,2…n)n c N, is the mean of a discret distribution of n measurement forA specific period of time (in theexample 1 year. Thus,H0 the annualmean is a year mean in the region 0(see slide 90 on various river dischar-ges and standard deviation – varianceOf the annual mean of water eleva-Tion in a river canal
(Y)
Riverstrand
Rivercanal
(Flood prone area)
Land subsurface
Y = y(t) variation of the flood portion over time. Also, portion of the river above the river bedSecurity (rbs)
rbs
*Normally known through detections of the wateradvancing inland--flood water raising up, water elevation occurs because of the lack of soil inflitration with the time and soil structures and the distance travelled by the flood from the river channel (see slides 67)
Flooding formula
(rbs-rbm) +b= a+b
rbm
b)Model 1 for flood (improvment):remarks
Preliminary remarksParameters that influence Y= y(t). Y= y(t) is the water elevation dueto flooding on the land sub-surface. But does flood occurs? How, When and where? What are the characteristics of the flood?Which elements are influencing the flood characters: -weather types, -river flows, -canal characteritics, -landsurface crossed by the flood.
Models presented here and their improvment will attempt to answerthese questions in order to find the best detection network.
c)Model 1 for flood (improvment):bis(validation framework)
Understanding the basic flood modelConditions for the basic flood model to be applicable.
2 steps process to validate the model:
Step one: what are the important data to captures in the floodpredicted arrival (or real flood undetected with traditionalMeans –but could be detected with the new technology)
Step two: enouncement of the requirements:
d)Model 1 for flood (improvment):ter(description of the flood with ordinary words)
Description of the flood concept (application for the strand of A river –water innundation coming from water flowing over its upper riverbed limit ---called the river strand portion of the river canal facing the land).Perhaps, it can also goes beyond –question to answer later
After crossing the river bed, the flood portion travel a distanceVariable according to the characteristic of the travel surfaceon,which it has occured
[Intermediate questions?How far the model can be applied beyond the strand?Is the detector well placed at the fringe of the strand?]
e)What happen when water goes beyond its average mean and above the river bed security: Inundation equation (rbs – rbm) + b = a+b –study of the river
bed security and flood conditions)
H0
rbsrbm b
a
f)Excess of overflow --run-offs in excess in the river due to the rain than cannot be drained and, which is createing the split over the river bed –flood--
River bed security(rbs)
River averageNormal elevation
A (a1, a2, a3)
B (b1, b2, b3)Excess of run-off that does not
Create flood
River bed margin (rbm)
b2
a2
Flooddetector 1
Flooddetector 2
20km
C (c1, c2, c3)Excess of run-off that
Create flood
FlowA
FlowB
FlowCc3
(rb)flood=c3+b2 -rbs
Flood portion FlowP
Split of the flood portion ouside the river bedI think it is the portion of water over the river bed that creates the flood over a period of time related to the time being spent by the Water outside the river bed.This portion need to be detected
VII- Sampling Model of the flood portion
E (t)
E (t): thickness of the flood portion varying with time
River width
River height
rbs
Average water discharge(river flow)
H0
Hmin
Hmax
A gauging method applied to the river canal
dry river (empty)
Maximum water river subsurface(or upper limit of the river canal
or river bed or strand for the flood event)
Strand
river bed or canal height
H
Gauging equationH = rb - rbs
rbs
Gauging = reading
Reading zoneon the rulers
rb
rbs: river bed securityMaximum discharge Acceptable in the river bedbefore flooding (possibleflood or innundation)
assumption: outside
dry bed season, the River bed is not empty
Flood equations for the riverflood=c3+b2 –rbs>0 (equation 0)Equation 1: b2 +c2 > b2 + rbm (flood innundation condition)Equation 2: a2+b2+c2 – rb < 0 ( river flow equation)Flood equation: a2 + b2 + c2 - rb > 0 Equation 3: c3 > rbm = rb – (rbs+a2) (2nd equation for flood condition)b2=rbs (identity condition)Equilibrium equation: a2 + b2 +c2 = rb = rbs + margin + a2
Issue with the flood equations: these equations take into account only the elevations factor of the waterRiver flow, in which is our interes : components (2) (a2, b2, c2 of flows A, B and C) of the various flows (normal A, excess B and excess creating the flood C). Component 1 is for speed, and 3 the flow sections.
Such basic flood equations supposed that the speed and/or the sections of the flows are unchanged during the riverflow (total river flow) and the various river flows.Later, we will see that only the dimension of the flow (Q) is conserved. It is the volumeOf water per time, which can be conserved (with assumption of a fix regime– falseAssumption I suppose depending of the type of flood as flood flow is never fixed butTransitory. I may expect to find the time that would help for this fix regime and toPosition the flood indicator during the season and the right place on the ground in orderTo reduce uncertainties though the detections
Adventages: good for a first simulations of the flood detection model. Locations of detectors and goingBeyond average measure that could be dangerous in assessing flood water speed and elevations
VII-Summary of the flood equations
III-THE FLOOD PORTION APPRAISAL
Lab 8: Assumption on the flood frontline speed
Toward a conclusionA simulation model: transport
Travel of a water packageThat varies with timeStart time t= t0, flood occurs
Flood portionQF?
First floodInitial Flood portion QF = [w (m)] x [y (m) x speed record]
Issue with the flood detection: is it really relevant to differentiate vertical speed (water elevation of the flood/second) and the horizontal speed (the distance travelled on the land by the flood front line?Exploration of the mobile model to simulate flood
dy/dt (vertical speed)
dx/dth (horizontal speed)
dz/dt (lateral speed
Flood as a mobile
Resp: different casescenario from the flood type classes:1-flood flows can be very very slow (so slow that one may think there is none, the flood network is not working). ThisRelative muteness is measlideng as for sur the likelyhood of a flood is high.(emergency evacuation order would failbecause of the long lead time for the flood predicted arrival time. 2-Short lead-time: speedy flood with low elevation3-giant flood/short time responsiveness4-giant flood long-time to arrive
This is related to the flood powerP=W/t (robust flood versus non robust flood
This package of water (variation 2.5m X 20km is travelling instantanetly to is new configuration (water package) either new water increases or decreases the total mass of the flood water. In physics it is the flood movement quantity. It help to assess the impact of the flood water during a crash collision on its trip.
20km0
2.5 meters
Line 90°
Assessment of the initial flood flow
The first flood flow is different than the first flood portion
FT: Flood travelRT: River travel
2
3
1
2
1TT: Total travel 3
Travel = flow
Flow equation3= 1+2 are supposedTo be constant and conservativeFlow eq: speed x elevation x widthS3V3 – S1V1 = S2V2With S (section) =W x elevation
: x(t) . y(t). z.
x y
z
a (t)
b(t)
c
a(t) . b(t). c
C
A (t)
B(t)
Conservative Equation of flows
(Velocity measured during 1 second
Section ofFlow 1
d(a)
d(a): distance travelled for 1 second is the velocity
d(b)
d(b): total water elevation before floodingdx: quantity loss from flooding (elevation component)dy:quantity loss from flooding (width component)dz: quantity loss from flooding (
dz
dxdy
Flood flow
Total flow(before flood)
Very important assumption: Hypothesis all waterflows passing from the river into the flood travel and keep travel on the same axis (da (variation on the river
bed goes on dx)
dx
drx
drx=dr-da
r
a
rx
dw
dw
Obviously it may not be the case. It is why we work with the pressure (pipe representation)
Flowbefore flood
Flooding flow
Flow afterflood Flow 3
Flow 2
Flow 1
P 3
P2
P1P= F/S
Bernouilli equation½ µV(i) + m(i) g H(i) + P(i) =ctei=1,2 and 3
Flow equations
Fi= X(t) (i) . Speed (i)i=1, 2 and 3
2
flows after the flood(assumption river flow and flood flow speed are the same and section?
A(t) – a(t) = x(t) B(t) – b(t) = y(t)C(t) – c(t) = z(t)
Flow= section . Speed
Flow 1= Flow 2 + Flow 3
Flow 1= w . rbs. A (1)Flow 2= z(t).y(t).z(1)Flow 3= Flow 1-Flow 2
t= second unit
Conclusion: Flood front line speed: average and real –simulation-
Horizontal distance
10 km
1hour
1.25m
Water elevation
Horizontalspeed
2 questions:1- Can we simplify bernouilli for flood2- Can I validate the model developed without taking into account some assumptions
III-THE FLOOD PREVENTION
Lab 6: My own flood laws
The flood laws: the transformation of flooding into flood
Law 1: The water suppply to the soil surface (water infiltration)Law 2: The soil structure
(For details of these laws see slides on water infiltations-Ref: the geographer Joseph Holden- and, the soil struc-Ture –Ref. Dr. John Anthony Allan-)
A sample model for simulated flood (flood stimulation?)
Water in excess fromThe river bed security
That create flooding
rbs = rb – H (gauging eq.)
strand canal
river width (w)
Flow (m3/s)= [w (m)] x [H (m)] x [V (m/s)] (flow equation)
X = a
Y= 2
X2
D1
D2 Y=2.5
In my flood prone zone, assumption is a = 0and (di – dj) = 20 kmare fixed distances between the floodDetectors. (i= 1…n, and j =i+1). (i, j) c N x N
H2O2 m
a)Lab 9: Flood detection, forecast and accuracy
1-Based on: the flood velocity, the flood elevation, the flood pollution,the road congestion and a disabled water trucking
2-Possible Emergency response: WAER is alternative health and flood plan 3- Flood Modeling with:1-Basic radar analogy detection2-Basic math: arithmetic, statistic and geometry for the simulation of flood flows,flood elevations and flood packages3-Transport system with queueing (waiting line), stock of passengers for fine tuning4-The fluid Bernouilli law model is the ultimate for flood detection and what are thethe adaptation for the indicators5-Importance of subsurface slopes and soil status in flood elevation and speed formation6-assumption: flood events are predictable and flood sources are: water inflitration capacity due to the sediment accumulation in the channel river obstructing the flowand creating a flooding condition. The flood occurs, again, due to water infiltration capacity this time on the flood travel land (flood prone regions). --Normally a bank riverchannel fits its flow -- and vice-versa, a river flow creates the perfect conditions for accomodating its seasonal flooding.– All disasters come from the fact added to the physical geography is a human geography.
d)Lab 2: Radar map detections (without radars)
100km pollution zoneFrom the water feature
(1) Flood indicator(speed -cyclometer type- and water elevation –hydrogaph type--Resulting from gauging detections-New technologies-
Flood detectorTechnology (1)
riverDistance range circles
100 km
Mount
ProtectiveWall
River zoneSurveillance(sector)
North
90°
45°0°
180°
270°
235° 135°
315°
115°
70°Community
village
b)Assumption with 2 flood indicators – the flood velocity and the flood elevation detector spaced 20
km away.
Flood detector functions: are equivalent to one man or 2men carrying field activities 1 and/or 2:
Activity 1: measurement of time (with a clock/watch)Activity 2: measurement of the elevation with a ruler
Notes:A-The technology –flood detector-- is an automation of both activities.B-One or 2 operators depending of their skills and the difficulties to access to measurements during the flood. C-If the technology is implemented, one should not need labour for gauging (the flow elevation) and measuring the flow velocity.
c)Lab 1: The flood map drawing
Not a ready made one-should be drawn before/jointly implemention of a flood detection system.-1° find the true north (map orientation)-2° define obstacles in the landscape that determine the flood corridors-3° draw them on the map: obstacles + corridors-4° position the equipment relatively to the detection goals-5° find entry/exit roads to the flood prone corridor to bring :materialand equipment safely-6° power (energy and data cables or wireless) all material and Equipment.-7° Install safety zones for humanes-7° testing and stand-by (operations)
e)Lab 3: River surveillance with the flood detector-Potential flood corridors-
Mount
70°
Wall
115° 155°42°
Elevation (H), speed (S) and time (T)H and d=ST river
Flood detectors
Flood penetration inland(outside the river banks)
d:Distance range (GPS location)
Community village
100°
GPS location or RFID mappingDatabaseComputertreament
SpeedAndelevation
Wateralternatives
Flood prone zone
f)Lab 4: Community village protection:event scenario
70°
115°
Mount
Villagezone
walls
FloodDetectors
100 km
80 km
60 km
40 km
20 km
90°Flood station
a river
N
Flood frontline
80°
100°
Flood corridor(70°,115°)
g)Lab 5: Importance of a flood detector map
070
CommunityVillage
(30,000 households)
CommunityVillage
(30,000 households)
080
090
100
110
120115
110
1008060402000 32 68
Flood frontline
The flood detectorsconvey information on:-flood speed-flood elevationThese knowledge givetime for a solution:Water supply, evacuation,Other preparedness forFuture risks
km
degree
Flood station
H00 -H20 = 20 km NTo read the map
Corridor 070° – 115°
Benefits brought by Virtualization
Lower expenses(physical assets reductions)
Business continuity(No redunancy or back-ups ratio 1:1 is avoided)
High availability(independence of virtual devices)
Fast Installation(Use of a software)
Corporate governance (Transparency rules for the central point=security)
(Source adaptation AT &T)
Hardwares
Hypervisor
OperatingSystem
Virtualization=squeezing process, memory, network…
Definition: computer device reductions (compactation) to serve primary machines and getting out a biggest bang for the bugsInterests: Cost, energy and environmental savings of the IT infrastructureConsolidations of servers and data centersOperating system works with one type of hardware while virtualization helps to standardize: no worry about hardware or softwaresThe virtualization software, firmware or external providers (hypervisors or virtualization layer) maps real and virtual resources
WBS New Technology (NT) RFID Grouping in the virtualization process at Integrated Flood Resource
Managament Levels
RFID(A2)
RFIDs
Operating System
RFID(A1)
RFID(A3)
Configuration Management
Adaptation :Sample case of organisation with RFIDIs in the RFID Journal: the Dolphin StadiumCalifornia State, people security
Sample of case study: RFID and security (Dolphin Stadium)Also, AIRBUS
-Wireless network able to support POS systems-RFID is competing with WI FI (less equipment)
-Adventage of the stadium: possibility to run high bandwidth services: voice mail, data and video tansmisssion, interesting in outdoor transmission and specific environments-illuminating of blackholes and reducing stocks by 50% -- Ref.: Technology Provider/integrator: check points systems, KooBra software; Location Pfaeffikon, 8808, switzerland, Charle Vogele group, largest Clothesretailer in Switerzeland--
(Source internet: RFID Journal
WBS of New Technology (NT) –RFID network
Hypervisor Hypervisor Hypervisor
OperatingSystem
RFID RFID RFID
ManufactureLevels:-Assembly bases-Water stations-Buoys-Flood detectors
IFM Level
PART X
QUALITY
Indicators (output management)
Flooddata
Sustainability
DailyBusiness
Quality OutputAlter
natives
6 sigma
Dow Jonesindex
Sales
Inventory
Raw material
Manpower
Quality
Flow speed
Elevation
Hazards
Causes
Problems
Impacts
River size
Infiltations
Softwares
10-20
Too much
Too little
average
Stock
1-Flood indicator for forecasts
The flood Indicator is an appropriate technology and its coverage zones would help to scale-up flood detections that cannot be predicted by the software simulation modelings or the radar detections.
Either because, there is no data captures:« I have considered there are more unknowns – uncertainties– than flood evidences/certainties or valid predictions due to the fact that the Earth planet is still empty with direct presence of humanes.
or if increasing lead-times of predictions are WMO new goals to improve forecasts (Ref.: WMO conference in Costa Rica 2006), it implies additional investment in more data captures in order to scale-up the new coverage zones till today not covered, for instance the sea, swamps…other unhabited areas on Earth or the outer space. »
These additional traditonal means are: vessels, aircrafts, sattelites,…weather stations and there are till today not being consider as sustainable.The software modeling successes the data captures and the new investment.
2-Flood indicator for forecasts
Today, more factors need to be taken into account to get eventually these flood forecasts right: weather, climate, hydrology, population growth, new urbanism, sustainable development, policies…
However, my viewpoint is flood studies are a dependancy of the weather andclimate studies.
The importance -- various types-- of floods in the economy allow to think that flood forecasting should have an independant status from the weather forecasts.
The weather forecats can play an important part in the prediction of the hurricane seasons--, but, flooding conditions can occur in places very loosely connected with the flood place. For, instance the flood in Sudan can are sourced from the rainy season in Ethiopia. Also, the fact that countries are sharing water basing, theyorder to develop its own methodology. Can flood also develop without the weather elements (?)
3-Flood indicator for forecasts
Anyway, being independant does not mean absence of collaboration. Flood hydrology development would always needs the weather forecast and an autonomous research actions. in this case the flood indicator is an appropriatetechnology, non-administrative, favouring intermediate technolgies, decentralization, use of local materials and assistance to complement existing system (WMO, IHO…(?)) and improvment of non technology flood forecasts
Quality in detecting the water rise (a)
They are placed in strategy points (see PBS for flood indicator for flood detector locations). It is very relevant in zones, I previously called ponds or dark zones (holes) where their is no predictions.
Dark holes (Swamps, Camargue,…remote places on earth)?
Look out-points and floodDetectors in between theForecast knowledge points
Uncertainty 1 (Horizontal uncertainty)
Horizontal line (subsurface)
Quality in detecting the water rise (b)
Uncertainty 2 (Vertical uncertainty)
Horizontal line (subsurface)
Upper horizontal line
« Known » prediction zone
« Known » prediction zone
?Uncovered,Unknown predictions,Uncertainty zone
SolutionsDirect indicators.Measurement:Gauging manuallyor technically usingNon traditional technologies
PART Y
Resources
Production item+2 oz PocketWater purifier+Outdoor delivery
Product delivery:-aircraft drops-Product Capture:-Resource:+Event manager+boat+fishing equipment+mobile+address book+GPS
In good conditionsAnd functionalFor all households
During the alert
Before the alert
A-PROJECT ORGANIZATION
Delta
Sea
Flood station
DroneAssemblybase
Flood detectors
Warehouse(With water purifiers)
Direct transmission
RFIDtransmission
Water basin
To data centre(Network)
Drone At sea
Vessel
drone (stand-by)
Drone before launching
Mount
Lab 1: Integrated Flood Resource Management: WAER Project version
Role of the capacity buildersCoordination
IWRM
Datacentre
B-WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURES
Organisation project
Start Initiation
Planning
StageManagement
control Closure
Board
Workpackage
Mandate
WBS Level 1: Work Breakdown Structures (Division)(Country Administration representatives- IFRM)
IWRMA
IWRMB
IWRMC
CEO
IFRA1 IFRA2 IFRA3 IFRB1
WAER Integrated Flood Management units
Region A: means Flood zone in region A (highly probable flood occurrencein some part of the world at regular interval of time during a season. Predictionsthrough internationl forecast offices (official and forecasting clubs))
IFR A1 means: Integrated Flood Resource Management of the WAERNetwork using the drones and pocket water purifiers in thregion A, flood unitLocation 1. Prediction through WAER network is a tuning of official networksThat do not predict flood in the real world.
1 IWRM= 3 regionsDepending the size ofThe IWRM
(100km zoneas a reference distance)
ResourceBreak downstructure
Projectorganization
W.B.S.
Administrative organization, linked with power, externalities, use of forces to control weather and hydrology events, responsibilities for deliverables….
WBS Level 2: Work Break down structures(Hybrid) People representation-IFRM level)
WBS CEO
Products MIS System
SpateWAER Internet RFID
Accounting
Land,Real-estate
Merchandising
Purchasing
Personal
Self integrated
Country or region level of organization Integration of the flood preventionwater disability project. Work BreakDown Structure (WBS). This organization is facilitator of theFlood mission units (IFRs) as it givesThe CEO has more control on the businesscomponent and the function let him playA greater role in administrating the assetsSupplies
WBS Level 3: Work Break down structure(at Flood Service level)
SystemsMarketing
R & D
Manufacturing
CEO
ComputersComponents
IFMs
Products
IFMA
IFMB
IFMC
IFMD
Support
Project Manager
Sample of Project Manager avtivity in IFRB, equiping with computersAnd building a base
Finance
PART Z
FLOWCHARTING
Lab 1: Project Flowchart
The representative flowchart of the project for flood Forecasting and services --emergency preparedness and assistance are based on the WMO weather and hydrology service.
It is an hybrid organization combining the WMO with a model of flood detection, responsiveness, leverage that is proactive and local base (before asking for external assistance).
A flood detection mission unit with rapide reponse will help toreduce the lead-times between flood detections (predictions) and the intervention: preparedness-emergency and assistance.
Flow chart focuses on:1-Understand the business environment of the flood detection activities and ouputs –forecasts--, the couplage of the weather and hydrology services, the importance of the uncovered flood zones --unscaled-up flood areas or prone regions on earth--, which carry the flood uncertainties and the disaster likelihoodness impacted by the flood.
These are permanent risks for weather and hydrology service organizers/stakeholders, mainly today through the lens of global warming, raising waters, population growth, modern, urbanism, land planning,…
2- I supposedly emphasis the importance of dark zones/pools/ponds (refering to UNand other UN related organizations) for the increasing numbers of flood and severitysituations –where flood controls are difficult if none or no controls at all.
3-The new opportunities of flood development systems offers to the business community new potential markets, a water finance for all by using appropriate and compact solutions that do not disconnect people and their environment.
4-These chart flows are conveying an information for better leveraging the flood forecast organization: the purpose of the WAER project.
Flowcharting bases (WMO Services)
RELATIONSHIPS WITH OTHER PROJECTS (IIIA)
The short-term
• With the World Meteorlogical Organization (WMO)• -Common Methods:• =>Lead-time influences (WMO President, WMO website and WAER are targeting
lead-times) Production on Forecasts (WAER Pollution, No waste Policy, Speedy Supply chain,
Prediction and Production on forecasts, IFM: cater for the needs, plural answer valued more than a global answer)
• =>The Data treatment (Database versus Spreadsheet and internet)• -Distinctions:• =>WMO increases lead-times, WAER lead-time reduction strategy• =>Forecast zones for coverage (Sea versus flood zones and dark zones)• =>The technologies (Forecast Software simulation versus flood look-out points and
intermediate technologies) • =>The networks: public versus private or combination –also, outsourcing
Anyway, the real framework of flood reductions strategies (long-termism views)• =>Acting on Global Warming and Climate Change
=>Land planning either for agriculture or urbanism• =>Synergy between the various forecast networks
=>Development of simulation forecasted methods (short-termism) • =>Development of new thinking and innovations• =>Allowances and training for forecasts without tools• =>Role of education and sociology (narrative stories)• =>Improvment of traditional forecast methods
Flowcharting bases (WMO Flood division)
RELATIONSHIPS WITH OTHER PROJECTS (IIIB)-With the Integrated Flood Management Division (IFR HelpDesk)Focus on --possible-- distinctions -- Link with users: administrations, firms, process, public/private, poor people…
– Data captures : WMO: HelpDesk (and other MIS)– WAER: website, mobile phone, computers, stations, forecast technologies…– Sharing knowledge: backgrounds, organizations, networks– The Flood Law is under construction / WAER is a project combining existing
multinationals and various agreements: individual choice, contracts and cultures
– Virtual discussion with meeting groups (IFR HelpDesk widely open to users for flood matters: flood policies and flood tools)
– Mobile phone camera and internet may describe better what people lived than words.
– Use of googleFocus on common points-- Flood solving problem: flood issues-- Use of engineering worksFocus on indeterminations (unknowns)– Shape of the IFR HelpDesk: under testing period until March 2010.
Lead-times:Increase or decrease? – =>WMO/Weather and Hydrology service: increase (Ref.: WMO website)– =>M. Jarraud WMO President: increase (Ref: flood increase meeting in Costa
Rica 2007)– =>WAER:dicrease e.g. the acting should be as short as possible , – =>IFR HelpDesk: I don’t know/Nobody asked/ The director did not tell us/Could
be both/
Flowcharting bases (Engineering framework)
RELATIONSHIPS WITH OTHER PROJECTS (IIIC)Engineering works: rules of engagement? (contracts, rules of law, politics…)
Sharing knowledge: analogous to SIWI platformEngineering works
Real world of floodsWAER project is rather business orientate, but can ensure public service missions. (WMO is intergovernmental)
Phase 1:The possible answer is global (water purifiers+drones) e.g. project starts with
a technology business --Rapid Response Unit i.e. like the firefighters in action but for floods. Data are captured through users’ camera mobile phones and internet or forecasts at look-out points. A relevant samples of villages or part of a city could be investigated for the trials.
Phase 2 : A multibusiness caters customer needs with water adaptation strategies: « the Spate engineering » for flash floods to complete WAER is the ultimate goal.
While the IFR HelpDesk is a tool of WMO and Global Water Partnerships to link users, but the responses would not be a unique answer (Words of the Director Avinash C. Tyagi: « I do not know yet if it would be a single answer or can take various forms ».Also, extension of phase 1 to more households than previously.
Phase 3:Recruitement and training new staffs, people MIS development. Networking
Flowcharting bases (striving for output)
WAER high-level timing goals (output management)
• +Lead-time reductions• +Coupling Weather forecasts and Hydrology• Flood forecasting• Decoupling water trucking• Basic of productions: limiting steps, off-set
activities, throughout time• Speedy water supply chain: no waste, pollution
reduction, « low water stocks », production on forecasts
• Networking
I-Flowcharting for production activities –outputs
Non evident Flood
Drone Base search
Operational
droneWAER
Stand-byWAERActivate
W. Forcastdeliverables
Evidentflood
FloodForecasts >0
Floodevidence
Base found
SurgeRain
Floodforecast
Flooding
Checks
Droneorder
Sirenes RFID alarms
Visit checkNo forecast
No technology
Darkponds
Softwaresimulation
Radar detection
WAERdetection
Bad Weather
Visualforecast
Purifierorder
DronePreparation
order
Drone in progress
LauncherIn progress
Dronevoucher
Purifiervoucher
Proceedvoucher
Proceedvoucher
Launcherready
Droneready
Assemblyauthorization
OperationalDrone ready
Fired drone
Flood Zone identification
IdentifiedDrop zone
droppedPurifiers
Drinkingwater
Activationorder
Surge water
Hurricane
FloodMap
Flood Zone identified
Rainreport
Hurricane report
Preparadness
(pre-alert)
FloodForecasts <0
variationWMO forecast
WAERforecast
Personalwarning
Visualforecast
H2-H1>h
Hydrograph
Typhoonalert
No coverage
ForecastNeed
Preparadnessalert
MandateCapacitybuilding
No water trucking
Radiodecodeur
For. needanalysis
Forecastresolution
ForecastMeeting
A rescue team
Options
Water
surface
Base ready
Lab 1: Production
FlowChart
Preparadnesstarts
Test
Flood zoneaccess
Authorization
Lab 2: Grouping chart simplification
Mandate
Tests
WeatherCapacitybuilding
Hydrologydetection
Weatherdetection
Prepa-radness
Detectiontechnology
Hurricane
Surge rainFlash flood
No detection
Needs
Bases
FloodDetector
Look-out points
RFID
Preparadness
Activation
Production
Drops
Pole B:Preparedness Long-term
Pole DEmergency
Pole A:AdministrationPole C:
Preparedness Medium-term
Pole E:Forecast development
Flowcharting the 21 rst century flood issues: – no forecasts, flood scale-up issues and protection systems
Pole Administration
Pole Emergency
Pole PreparednessMedium range
Flood Forecast development
Pole Preparedness Long Term
FinancingMechanism
National countryExternal
Goal
Friendly banks and customers
Broadbanddevelopement
RFID
Internet
Mergers
New capacity building
Old CapacityCuilding
Old CapacityCuilding
BTSA
Consulting group
Mandate
II-Flowchart for financing-including the Camdessus 2003 report-
Flowchart for the financial assistance
Low Earnings
(LE)
Scenariocases
Above(LE)
Benefitcard
No resources
Alternative
resources
HouseholdsIndividuals
citizen
visitors
Duration/Time length
Over6 months
deliverables
Less than 6 months
deliverables
deliverablesdeliverables
The balance between giving a small loan and alternatives –like a membership cards for free –goods and services- ideallyCan be found in many developped economies in down tur crisis. This kind of help could be extended to emerging eco-Nomies dealing with distress flood situations.
Flowchart taking into account the integrated environment
For the System Environment Economic Accounting - SEEA – (Ref. UN Statitical Division on internetAnd the text of: Jinhua, Social Sciences in China, Vo, XXX, Nr 3, August 2009, 5-24, design and discussionof a model for China’s environmental and economic accounting system, financial contribution was made for by the National Social Science Foundation project )
Drone Work Package(Ref.: Christophe Leroux, CEA)
WP 1: Project ManagementWP 2: Specification and designWP 3: Mission control systemWP 4: Location and autonomous navigationWP 5: Obstacle avoidanceWP 6: Drone prototyping and operation system (Air robot)WP 7: Evidence based concept: 2 prototypes in operation to validate the experimentation in-board camera (3pixels)
WORKPACKAGES AS DEFINED BY THE AUTHOR OF THE DRONE PROJECT IN ABOVE REF.
Basic flood management principles:Influences
-Influence on the project Sustainability Standard and
-The global integration with trade, trade barriers, strategy development…
-Function or mission organizations regarding Appartenance to groups
- (philosophy, commerce, North, south, east west…marketing strategy)
-And pro poor business devlopment, technology transfer and International
aids and coordination
Influence quality control, norms and globalization
Role of regulations across borders, corridors, tax incentives
Strategies of development, group pressures, lobbying,….
History is never ending, the beating of times…
Business partnerships, governments as a resource
Inter mobility, infrastructure, environment…
Measuring results: World Bank Project & Operations,from the comprehensive Development
Framework, 1998
Board of Executive Directors
ImplementationCompletion
(End of disbursementPeriod)
Informationpurposes
Disbursementperiod:Pb, lessonlearnt
Project performanceAssessment
(6weeks)
Field Mission
sustainability impacts
Bank operation and
Evaluation staffReports
Impact eveluation (5 to 8 years)
Inspection panel
Review claims ofBank Project failures
Developmentactivities
Bank performance
ConformityWith Bank CAS
SingleProject
CountryAssistanceEvaluation
(10 studies/y)
SectorAnd thematic
Reviews(6 studies/y)
ProcessReviews
(2-3 studies/y)
BUSINESS CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR)
AGBAREnvironmental news: acquisition of an environmental company Interlab to strenghen its environmental dedicated division Aquagest Medioambiante: analysis of water and air
Certification, Profile: branches in Andulusia, Catalonia and Valencia. Turn over 7 million in 2008.
Also, Taeyoung Entec, an environmental Technology Korean firm acknowledged a €20 milllion investment from AGBAR. This is part of its development process in East Asia (with high economical growth potential)
(Ref. Internet)
Portofolio Project Management
Wateraerator
Plantingtrees
Modularscaffolds
Waterpumping
Product BreakdownStructure
(P.B.S.)
CO2 reduction
Water run-offs
Sustainability
No stagnant water
Pollution treatment
Water evacuation
Drainage
Water Cool down
Stop germ production
Anti smell
Senior house
Elevation house
Assembly base
Sub-goals
Water stocks
Infiltrations
Impact list due to flood flow infiltrations, only-Flood law, compensation and risk-Adaptation strategies, mitigations and urbanism-Contractual agreements, cultural aspects and sociology-Innovation in product development-Job creations linked to the IFRM (web, engineering,…)-Loss of earnings, GDP and country economy –indirectly…--Death toll increases, water poisoning and diseases (due to contaminated water)-Loss of properties and livelihoods-Multihazards: violence, crimes, looting…-Re-settlement (close to a source of water), evacuation and sheltering-Male asylum seekers and unprepared migrations-Women and children stress increases-Firms unabled to manufacture products and services without water: a farmer, ice maker…-Water pollution, people sanitation and hygiene-Energy: electrical consuption and the water source-Environmental changes-New thinking for technology, design and R&D-Humanitarian actions-Financing flood crisis and insurances-Others: Education, land planning, food security-Governance, poverty cycle, corruption…….
PROJECT FINANCE
Project finance
StartOf the year
StartOf the year
EndOf the year
EndOf the year
Money Money
ProfitProfitSound financial managementSound business managemntSound financial managementSound business managemnt
Pile of assets
At this stagethere is no distinctionbetween N.G.O.s,
Non-Profit- organizations
and firms’
finance
At this stagethere is no distinctionbetween N.G.O.s,
Non-Profit- organizations
and firms’
finance
Assetdevelopment
Communityservice
Wealthcreation
Returns On Assets
SalesN . unit sale price
Service Water supply
SuppliesDrone+Raw Mat
Returns Supports Plc
Passive returns
Ratio 1/6 (ADB)
….
Real estates Land price
Equipement Raw materials
InventoryWaterpurif.stock
Assets Cash Profi
Trade receivables
Customer debt
Others Assets: bases…
ROA
123456789
16
Accounting Rate of Return (A.R.R.)
Average Annual ProfitAverage investment
Theory base and problems with ARRROA, ROI, NPV approach
Valuation method: project NPV
Future Casflows = Initial Investment (1 + r) power N, N > 0
+N is the number of years: 1, 2…n (project range) Depends on the time horizon line of the investment
+The rate (r): in the water sector 10% to 20% (banking rate) IDA offers grant without interest rate
+The higher the hurdle rate for the project and the better it is for the investors
+Comparing 2 NPVs during a same time horizon line (project range) NPV (Water trucking) – NPV (Water purifier drops) > 0
Starting point for the project finance and how it serves the risk analysis
What I want to show from my feelings and based on the analysis: theproject is viable and which are these conditions if the business is to survive.
1°My feeling is water trucking is a nice way to deliver water during a flood « if the level of water is sufficiently low to allow tuck traffics on the innundated roads »(Still I will have to have a look at the distance trip between the source of watersupplying the trucks and the delivery place. What is the proportion of cost incurred on the whole water service)
Problem identifications: 1a) Which level of water prevent the traffic and/or how to choose eventually the good truck to reverse the truck charge during flood and also to satisfy the sustainable development principle—more energies and less pollutions--
1b) Also, could I anticipate these water level values through the forecast (prediction) before any moves for the water supply with drones. This would help to make an early choices for a water trucking alternatives –in the case the floodwater rises dangerously, and disable the water trucking. What is the risk for a water system to deliver water fromaircraft drops of pocket water purifier?What are these risks?
Productivity analysis of morethan one alternative to water droning
Bottledwater
Waterdroning
Tapwater
Watertrucking
Water solution comparative
adventage analysis
Harvestingwater
Comparing 2 water systems
System 1 (NPV 1)
System 2(NPV2)
Gain
My viewpoint is sustainabilityIs about efficiency of water systems
Profit (gain) is an indicator of sustainable development
No profitDoes not meanThe system issustainable
Is it sustainable,In the way of theBrundtland report?
Watertrucking
Waterdroning
Estimation 1: Numbers or fraction of 1.5 litres in 10000 litres: 3,333.33 –or the number of persons able to drink for one day with water trucking or water purifier truck equivalent per one day.
Water trucking 10,000 litres per truck
2 oz pocket water Purifier1.5 litre/day
Humane water consumption1.5 litre/day
1 water purifierper person per day
3,333.33 peoplewater purifiers per day(people for one day)
Conclusion: 1 water trucking is equivalent to 3,333- 2 oz Pocket Water purifiers (in one day). Now if an emergency service wants to supply fresh water for 3,333 people. It would have to drop an equal amount of water purifiers e.g. 3,333.33 the same day.
Estimation 2: If a pocket water purifier lasts 3 months, how many water purifiers are needed per equivalent for one truck volume of water per one day.
+A 2 oz Pocket Water Purifier delivers during its life time –3 months– 135 litres of water (3 months x 30 days x 1.5 litre per day)
The number of fractions of 135 litres in a water trucking with a water capacity of 10,000 litres are: 74 (10,000 water litres/ 135) It is also, the total of 2 oz Pocket Water Purifiers for 3 months for a communitySurvival with 74 member
Conclusion: 10,000 litres of water, which is the delivery of one truck in a day can help a community of 74 persons at risk of flood to survive 3 months (assumption of water consumption of 1.5 litres per day). It is the equivalent of water. Capacity truck per day and 74 people drinking the same amount of water for 3 months: X 74=k 3(Y), K is a natural number with one truck capacity equivalent to 10,000 litres. The index 3 means for 3 months and 74equals 74 people
Issues: where is the balancing act between water trucking and water droning
1 day 10,000 litres 1 truck3.333,33 people
3.333,33 purifiers
90 days 135 litres Per person 74 people 74 purifiers
IssuesWhere is the balanceWhat is the right proportionFor the emergency efficiency?
Treatment of the equationX(74) = K(3) (Y)
Y (10000 litres per truck)
X grouping of 74 people per drone
1
1
2
2 3
3
Curve 1:1 1drone =1 truck for 1 truckPer day with 10000 you can supply3333.33 person 1:1 (1, 10000, 3333.33 1 drone, 74 person, 3 months, 135 individuals)
Curve 1:3 drone/truck= 1/374p, 3 month, 135 l. People need more water
Curve 2:1Drone/truck=2
New ratio table
Water needs: 1.5 litre/day
truck
drone
10000 1
2 oz Pocket water Purifier: 55g.100 x 55g = 5500g=5.5kg
Assumption: How many drones are needed for the emergency every 3 months (Life time of a water purifier)
100 2 oz Pocket Water Purifiers/drone
SummaryTruck capacity:10,000 litre
3333 people/day74 people with one water purifier for 3 month
Time (month)
People 1.5 litre/person
50 pax.1 month
50
1
1 drone60 persons(40 Pocket
Water PurifiersFor security
Water alternative productivity and debate
74 persons = 135 litres = 3 months= 90 days8.22 persons per day2.74 per 8 hours74 people per dayAverage: 3 people/hour
1 person every 20 minutes
1person=60 kg3kg/minute
3,333 people= 1days = 1.5 litres1,111 people per 8 hours3,333 people per 24 hoursAverage:138 people/hour
46 persons per 20 minutes
78 kg /minute
Water droning
Water truckingDeliver quickly a great
quantity of water for acheap price but it is notworking during a flood
Do not deliver a lot of waterbut can deliver during worstweather conditions
Obstacle 2:Good with volumesof activity e.g..intersting pointBut no deliveryDuring a severe flood
Obstacle 1:The risk is it cando it during a floodBut is it worth investingin this project taking intoaccount is lowVolume of delivery
Theory of fresh water supply productivity during flood
(Time: in 20 minutes)
In 2 people unit
XX
X
XXXXXX
X
Water deliveryfrom a drone
X
Water deliveryBy a truck
Emergency Response Productivity Curve
DeliverVolume
but flooddisabled
Love floodsbut deliver
little
20 minutes
1 peopleSlope: 1 person/20’
Slope 46 persons/20’
46
(1hour=60’)
X
Trucking: 138 p./hDroning: 3 p./h
46 p.
1 p.
Water trucking
Water droning
?
Issues:Which alternative is the best?How to find it ?
20 minute units1p: 1 person
Balancing act between water trucking and water droning
Lessons learnt from the Productivity analysisI-Productivity analysis
Competitors of 2 oz Pocket Water Purifier drops from aircrafts to supply fresh water i.e. tap water, water trucking have a comparative advantage outside the flood zone due to the discounted prices of the litre of water: =>tap water: US 0.56 cts/litre, =>water trucking: US 0.86 cts/litre, =>water purifier: US 7.69 cts =>and bottled water: US 38.45 cts/litre.=>harvesting water : cost of infrastructures to protect water
But during a flood experience supplying fresh water with taps and trucks are cancelled and bottled waters are remaining too expensive. --It is sending mixte signal for an air drop delivery insteadof doing nothing or lately (or plastic bottled waters)--
The only alternative is water droning still cheaper than bottled water (I suppose if it has not been used yet it because it is innovative and the humanitarian aspects of drone are still under R & D and the littleGain, also.
To reverse the charge on water droning would be to consider, it is a health plan (and not a pure business or add more Corporate Social Responsibility)—these are valid reasons.
Physically, the water rescue is either no alternatives or the 2 oz pocket water purifier drops from aircrafts to supply safe water. Drones can flight during a hurricane.
Equipment total costs (Tc) : Fixed costs (Fc)* +Variable costs (Vc)
Platform
Civilian flood zone Protective Area
Base
2oz Pocket Water Purifier
Water supplysystem
Vectors:droneswith
launchers-on a soil-on a boat-on a truck
Supports
Shoppingonly
Variablecosts
Cost distinctions
Remark 1: (*) As long as the number N (the number of 2 oz Pocket Water Purifier) is not execessive and Do not necessite an additional base to drop the excess of 2 oz Pocket Water Purifiers, the base and all infrastructures are consider as fixed costs for and during the incurred emergency mission. These costs incurred mainly during the preparedness and are related again to infrastructures, vectors and personal in salaries. The only parameter, which varied is the number of flood water sufferer equals to n (n is also equalled to N: assumption one water purifier per household
The flood disaster database with number of household members and total population in the flood zone or density population in the inundated area is relevant to know the exact absolute value of water purifier to be dropped, plus an additional security number in order to reach a saturation capability e.g. all flood sufferers should be able to have access to one water purifier or more – specifically, the children and women--
Cost distinctions and relevant costs
Remark2: I think it is not necessary to assess them accurately now for the purpose of the Project. At this stage a rough guide should be to consider water droning fixed cost lower than water trucking fixed costs (Assumption on fixed costs (Fc))
Anyway, there is no alternative to failure of water trucking during a flood except than airdrop survival means and also the fact that a permanent platform in the assisted country seems cheaper than a truck or car carrying the drone launcher and equipment, at large it should not exceed the cost of a truck (in the case the drone launcher is carried by a vehicle).
The drone launcher is preferable to be mobile – carried with vectors like a truck or a boat– as the likelyhood of flood can
be difficult to detect in place and time. The car carrying the drone launcher goed beyond the mobility that is attached
To the flood uncertainty (analogy with flood fighters or firefigters of the local fire station.
Also, the cost of a unique item that serves once is relevant to the 1rst project operation and do not incurred
Later in any new development for future emergency even if the same item is used. Once paid, they are paid once.
Assumption: n*=1000, Cost of 2 oz Pocket Water Purifier= $10, => Revenues = $10,000
$10
$2
$6
$2Raw materials
Manpower
Profit
Fixed
Costs (**)
(*) n: number of people likelyto suffer of fresh water supply shortage due to flood
**Variable cost related to (n): the number of people at risk of flood. For a water purifier unit: Manpower and raw material are fixed. If (n) starts to increase importantly the cost of the water purifier remains the same
The « false » break-even curve for the emergency
Fixedcosts
N: water purifier unitsBEP=0 ****
N Sale unit= N x var cost per unit + Fixed costN= Fc/[sale unit – vc]
Fc
(Revenues(5*))
N=n=1000***K= unit price
Sales=kN +FcSales=10 n +Fc
(***) Assumption 1 individual per household n=N(****In the emergency situation,the break-even point, BEP = 0
$
(5*): Here, I have supposed that the only variable is the number of persons (n=N). The revenues earned from the emergency situation is in fact a cost to the community. What is the reason for profit? $2
Vc (N)
Few considerations on the break-even points
In principle, the real emergency
should be able to deliver water, as soon as it has 1 customer, BEP =1, continuous variable: 0-1.
The revenue equation is a strait line – only function of the number of flood sufferers – this value indeed indicates that
the gap between profit and loss can be small and even smallerif (n): the number of people at risk of flood is small.
Is it worth investing?
Importance of the database and reporting to assess exactly the flood context and exact numbers of flood sufferers. Roles of household MIS, mobile phone, internet, flood detectors and the RFID transmittance,…for the real time flood event capturesForecasting and rapid response units of water purifier drops from small aircrafts.
Few considerations from the cost analysis
Remarks: Some humanitarian actions are not validatedbecause of these small numbers. Database
starts with an important number of sufferers.It is important to reorganize world databasesand improve the captures of data to describe
exactly what happens during a flood in details: quality and quantity and not approximatetly.
Also, the hydrology service should be autonomousfrom the weather service.
The break-even curve: the real one
Fixed cost
Total cost curve
Variable cost
Revenue curve
Volume of activity
$
0
B.E.P.
b
Loss zone Profit zone
Break even point
Here, BEP (b) is different than zero because of the relevant costs to get the revenue.
I had opted firstly to temove them (the false break-even curve) for the debate as normally drones and water purifiers are considered to be sustainable alternatives and if infrastructures are to be built, in principle their small sizes reduce cost of investment. But is it worth investing for a profit –outside the humanitarian action ?
One difference would remain in the operating costs: raw materials and labors. As the project develop the use of local materials and resources would be a priority.
Also, in the case of drone launchers attached on a truck to give more mobility to the emergency rescue through this means – the flood occurence carries uncertaintie--, it is ultimately a real challenge to compare water droning based truck with water trucking and the winner.
Both systems are vectors by trucks and the only parameters to differentiate the quality of alternatives would be (H-h) the water elevation over the truck water tolerance to flood elevation (h) and/or n: the number of people at risk and a reasonable capacity e.g. not enough building that would be worthinvesting into a drone project for the purpose of the humanitarian action --n also equals N: number of water purifiers. In this case the drone could be implemented with a basic base of assets (infrastructures)With the use of local resources and materials –to reduce costs even more.
Distinction between Break Even Curves
The difference with the false curve is that I have considered only the purchase of 2 oz pocket water purifier was a relevant cost. Other costs like the preparedness: capacity building,
acces base negotiation deals, costs of infrastructures: platforms, the network, the drone purchase occured once and are reused during several emergencies (Projects). Therefore there are just relevant once and not for future Flood event assistnce projects in the same country.. The BEP Occurs as soon as there is a flood and there is no minimum requirement for household numbers. If 1 person is requiring for help: BEP=0 a volume of activity for which Total cost equals total revenue. In fact this is fictious as the first profit is $2
Which is the profit revenue, which is in the 1rts water purifier sold (False break even curve).
The real Break Even Curve considers various approximations: the cost of staffs, costs of contengcies, fuels….small costs. In this case the BEP is different that the « 0 » value
All these approximations could be received in kind by assisted countries. In that case the False Break Even curve would be with an apparent simplicity linked with the fact that Total cost would be equals to revenue if $2 profit on each 2 oz pocket water purifier is reused for: training, flood development, other contingencies or miscellineous.
This is by definition what makes the difference between a NGO and Non for profit organizations and a multinational.
Today, with the introduction of the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), global firms have an awarness about their responsibilities toward the communities they are serving.
$2Raw materials
N= numbers of product deliver
$2 (N)Variable cost
$2
$6 Labour$6 (N)
Fixed cost
Profit?
Water supply serviceContingenciesRisks DevelopmentTraining
Costs and profit analysis
Proportions for various beneficiaries
2 oz Pocket Water Purifier Cost Pie Chart
17%
50%
33%
Raw Materials
Labour
Profit
Water trucking high profilewith various reserves
Water trucking break even points and load factorsHigh profile when H<h, because of the Volume of Activity dealt during the water rescue 46 persons/20’. The price of water is low –US 0.86 cts (excluding transport, oil, maintenance, driver salaries…).
So benefits come from the volume, but bying a truck, paying for the drivers and transporting water from long distances in perillous countries can peak up costs easily. At the end, there are no benefit and the revenues are low (and operations risky). Is it worth investing in water tucking with all the volume advantages, but also with adversitie?-High number of people at risk for emergency starts –in the database dealing with number of households-The flood elevation: H<h (can the truck deliver during the flood) -The distance to carry the water from sources to the flood zone-The use of oil or diesel as propelant is not sustainable-Costs of maintenance, new trucks, driver wages…-Risks:looting the truck, killing the rescuers, wheather conditions
-Conclusion: Prices can escalate and prevent the rescuer to help.
-One Positive point for water trucking (sus the volume)-The International community knows the return of such Humanitarian action (return on investment, ROI) And there is no surprise when the flood is low (H<h), there is a real benefit because of the volume 10,000 water litres for 3,333.33 people in one day or 74 people for 3 months
Water droning low profile butcan deliver in worst conditions. Why ?
Condition 1: water trucking disability (as indicator) H (Flood water elevation) - h (elevation of the truck)>0 -assumption for the truck: value for h=50cm (small trucks) to 1 m (high elevated trucks) => H > 0.5 to 1m (flood elevation) . H – h >0 water droning can go (indicator 1)
Condition 2: water droning to be equivalent to water trucking during a flood should be able to deliver for 74 persons X 135 litres of water for 3 months. (which is equivalentof 1 truck per day with capacity of 10000 litres.) Note: if the truck was enabling during the flood, such volume of water per truck would allow 3,333.33 people to drink 1.5 liter of water per day. Water trucking is a volume activity, if working.
Condition 3: is it worth investing in such Water droning project. How much it would cost In infrastructure to implement. From now I have the Feeling that water droning should be reserved to special types of flood (with risk adverse communities,Communities with a good habitat –senior houses that do not crumble with the flood).
Condition 4 (last) as establishing water droning On a permanent basis and an additional alternative to Water trucking outside important flood conditions, When H-h<0 need to makes some more break even Analysis regarding, investment, margin and security
Lesson learnt from the Risk analysis
Water droningWater trucking
$
How to make it really profitableIceberg investmentcost of infrastructuresare unseen still notImportant and it makes waterDroning an efficient sustainableAlternative to water trucking andOthers (explanation see following slides)
Low break-evenBEP =0-1
High break even
Load factor
Load factor
Costs thancan be invisibleor reduce to a strictminimum
Profitis a multipleof n: people
BEP level
revenues
Profit
BEP
High break-evenPoint, it should not be profitablebut truck are carrying volumeof activities, thereforea high return on the operation
2 differentStrategies?
Low break evenIt should be profitableIf there is a high numberOf people at risk and waterTrucking is disabled
Flood ?
n
H-h
ChoiceBalance Equation
Lessons learnt from the Break-even analysis (1)
II-Break Even (Curve) analysis
The delivery of safe water from an aircraft is not a risky experience.
It is not a risky experience at condition to have a small load factor, which is the case with minimalistical infrastructure scenario assumptions.
Tiny load factors can be significant in achieving the mission success by reducing the total cost for initial investment AND balancing water droning for small size communities.
In theory, profit –the small earning- would be achieved by housholds numbers willing to use the service for their water needs. If numbers drop to 0. No profit is made and the company incurred no cost as long we stay within the above condition.
Lessons learnt from the Break-even analysis (2)The delivery of safe water from an aircraft is a risky experience. 2 extremes:
a)Lots of investment for a small community:
The preparadness investment and fixed costs attached to drone launchers (base, truck, boat..) can be
permanent (highest risky assumption in the case of small commmunities is not the favoured solution).
Explorations of various avenues:
-Way to think about flood rescues by analogy with the firefighter brigade station in a civilian flood community
Service –volunteering more or less paid contributions ?
-Flood rescue relying entirely on private firms (and not international assistance) where the profit is not
Garanteed. What will be these Private frm structures ?
-Mix of hybrid organizations best suiting the community in flood prone zones (target of flood uncertainties).
A real match between flood uncertainties and catering a flood answer –in the instant emergency.
-New roles of NGOs, less governmental dependant and more privately orientate –with more or less
government participation –a kind of flood democracy. Note: it is different that the consensus building at inter
governmental level to bring the flood assistance to communities?
Lessons learnt from the Break-even analysis (3)
b) Is it worth investing for a larger community where flood occurrences are well
studied ?
In this case, solutions have been brought by national governments in charge of the civilian protection in
terms of disaster planning, the studies of the disasters and preventing mitigating the
occurence, educating people, insurance policies, flood engineering works, people
re-location, building flood architectures, hedge funding, also and etc. – All these precautionary measures belongs to the framework of the flood adaptation and mitigations of the UN Integrated Water/Flood Resource-IWRM/IFM) management policies and tools.
Considering the case, one wonder how responsive can be the flood community to such package of deals and
how peacemeal, it is still remaining ? Is it the role of the System Environmental Economical Accounting to
Answer –SEEA- ?
Lessons learnt from the Break-even analysis (4)
New exploration and how to answer?
Water droning choice compare to other alternatives –if existing.
-I suspect obstacles can be cheaper than the investment for trucks and/or other alternatives ). Also,
NPV /rate of return for the project may not reach investor hurdle rate (of returns) but still, if the flood
does not materialize these investment may not be lost and may not be difficult to bail out (Even if low).
-After all, these ivestment are not so heavy: a drone cost $30 and a Pocket water purifier $10. Is it worth
taking risk for a very little return (a part from taking risk to save people)? This answer is in the
Humanitarian action, the faifth the world in one, the trust in the community of destiny, the environmental
pressure of globalization-
Would this had happened if the today globalization did not existed? I think, this question leaves a room
for another debating about past courses of human history –energy history, migration history, reasons for
Wars, technological choices, humans resitance to stress…and their goodness?
Lessons learnt from the Break-even analysis (5)The only reasons to be engaged in a water droning system would be :
the change in heart of organization for flood sufferers,
Development of broadband technologies in mission organization (but not leaving room for cahotic
networks. A bit of coordination would be an added value, thus avoiding the formal/paper organization
with conflicting rules and a hierarchical/functional organization to cut costs –but is it really cutting cost
when salvation army of flood forecaster and forecast at the scale of the world, always need more
spending for materials and people. –How to insure that there is a goog coordination? Perhaps, the
equilibrium is a « de facto » balancing act due to the reality. Is it good to just let it running to pave
a way for flood sufferers. Tough job, also in:
improving the legislations,
flood civilians themselves like the idea of pocket water purifier drops from drone
instead of drinking contaminated water,
gouvernment themselves take in charge humanitarian drone projects,
interesting parties could be also philantropic organizations, and bankers for poor people.
Another way to lever the water droning is to reduce costs of infrastructures, increase the CSR in global
firms and also create a flood civilian society that go beyond what is doing firebrigade station or
intergovernmental organization. Like improvment of the democracy and governance.
Sales 10 10
People 6 6
Raw materials
2 2
Fixed costs 0 0