Head Tracking and Action Recognition in a Smart Meeting Room

16
Head Tracking and Action Recognition in a Smart Meeting Room Hammadi Nait-Charif & Stephen J. McKenna

description

Head Tracking and Action Recognition in a Smart Meeting Room. Hammadi Nait-Charif & Stephen J. McKenna. Objectives. Simultaneously track multiple people Perform automatic initialization Handle Person-Person Occlusion - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Head Tracking and Action Recognition in a Smart Meeting Room

Page 1: Head Tracking and Action Recognition in a Smart Meeting Room

Head Tracking and Action Recognition in a Smart Meeting

Room

Hammadi Nait-Charif

& Stephen J. McKenna

Page 2: Head Tracking and Action Recognition in a Smart Meeting Room

Objectives

1. Simultaneously track multiple people

2. Perform automatic initialization

3. Handle Person-Person Occlusion

4. Combine data from the 2 cameras to annotate the activity of all 6 participants

Page 3: Head Tracking and Action Recognition in a Smart Meeting Room

SIS Algorithm

Page 4: Head Tracking and Action Recognition in a Smart Meeting Room

SIS Algorithm

Solutions to degeneracy problem

1. Good Choice of Important Density

sub-optimal solution =>

2. Resampling

Page 5: Head Tracking and Action Recognition in a Smart Meeting Room

SIR Algorithm

Page 6: Head Tracking and Action Recognition in a Smart Meeting Room

Drawbacks of SIR Algorithm

1. Particles with high weight a statistically selected many times which leads to the loss of diversity of the particles

2. Prior is not the optimal choice for the importance function because it does not take into account the latest observation

3. SIR tends to be less accurate with smaller sample sets

Page 7: Head Tracking and Action Recognition in a Smart Meeting Room

ILW Algorithm

Page 8: Head Tracking and Action Recognition in a Smart Meeting Room

How ILW is Better

Half of the particles migrate to the high likelihood regions (because they take into account the latest measurement) in the state-space while the other half are sampled from the prior

So even if the prior is poor the estimate is better due the use of the other half of the particles in the high likelihood regions

Page 9: Head Tracking and Action Recognition in a Smart Meeting Room

Figure 1

Page 10: Head Tracking and Action Recognition in a Smart Meeting Room

Figure 2

Page 11: Head Tracking and Action Recognition in a Smart Meeting Room

Figure 3

Page 12: Head Tracking and Action Recognition in a Smart Meeting Room

Figure 4

Page 13: Head Tracking and Action Recognition in a Smart Meeting Room

Figure 5

Page 14: Head Tracking and Action Recognition in a Smart Meeting Room

Figure 6

Page 15: Head Tracking and Action Recognition in a Smart Meeting Room

Figure 7

Page 16: Head Tracking and Action Recognition in a Smart Meeting Room

Figure 8