HBM M&A · PDF fileHBM Pharma/Biotech M&A Report 2017 ... transactions. Also, the results...

12
February 2018 1 About the HBM Pharma/Biotech M&A Report The HBM Pharma/Biotech M&A Report covers all completed trade sales of US and European biotechnology and pharma companies with a therapeutic focus (Rx incl. generics as well as OTC). For 2014-2017, additional data for asset deals and transactions outside of US and Europe is provided. The report does not cover nutritional supplements, diagnostics, medical technology, digital health, life sciences tools, CROs, pharma manufacturing and services. Reverse mergers or minority investments are not included. Acquisitions that were structured as mergers for tax or other reasons are included. Upfront transaction value is defined in this report as the upfront consideration in cash and/or shares. By contrast, the total transaction value also includes contingent (“biodollar”) payments linked to reaching certain milestones. Additional data such as invested capital, exit multiples, stage of lead product etc. were collected from various sources. Please note that such data may be based on estimates and may not have been available for all transactions. Further information about the HBM Pharma/Biotech M&A Report including a list of all transactions can be found under http://www.hbmpartners.com/reports. The use of data and charts is permitted with reference to “HBM Partners Pharma/Biotech M&A Report”. The authors of the report welcome any feedback or corrections: Dr Ulrich Geilinger, [email protected] , Dr Chandra Leo, [email protected] and Dr Emil Bujak, [email protected] HBM Pharma/Biotech M&A Report 2017 Analysis of Biopharma M&A in 2017 (and previous years) Key Findings Worldwide biopharma M&A volume of completed deals (including contingent payments and asset deals) in 2017 dropped to $72.6 billion (as compared to $149 billion in 2016 and $230 billion in 2015). In 2017, only two deals topped $10 billion: The $30 billion acquisition of Swiss Actelion by Johnson & Johnson was by far the largest deal in 2017 (and the largest European biopharma M&A deal since the Sanofi Aventis merger in 2004). The second largest transaction was Gilead’s $11.2 billion purchase of US Kite Pharma, followed by the $6.4 billion buyout of German Stada by Bain Capital/Cinven and the $5.2 billion purchase of US-based Ariad Pharma by Takeda. The largest private deal in 2017 was the sale of 34-year-old US vaccine company Protein Sciences to Sanofi for $650 million upfront plus a further $100 million of contingent payments. US transaction volume was down to $30 billion (company and asset sales). Only 5 significant* public takeovers were reported, the lowest number seen in many years. The number of 14 significant private transactions was in-line with previous years. The $30 billion Actelion deal drove up transaction volume from European M&As to $40 billion. However, the number of transactions was quite low with only 7 trade sales generating upfront proceeds of $100 million or more. As in 2015 and 2016, M&A transaction volume outside of the US and Europe in 2017 was modest with a transaction volume of only $2.1 billion. Return multiples to VC investors from M&A stayed at high levels in 2017, but average multiples were lower than in the record year of 2016. * transactions with upfront proceeds of at least $100 million.

Transcript of HBM M&A · PDF fileHBM Pharma/Biotech M&A Report 2017 ... transactions. Also, the results...

Page 1: HBM M&A  · PDF fileHBM Pharma/Biotech M&A Report 2017 ... transactions. Also, the results presented in this report may deviate from our earlier reports due to subsequent

February 2018

1

About the HBM Pharma/Biotech M&A Report

The HBM Pharma/Biotech M&A Report covers all completed trade sales of US and European biotechnology and pharma companies with a therapeutic focus (Rx incl. generics as well as OTC). For 2014-2017, additional data for asset deals and transactions outside of US and Europe is provided.

The report does not cover nutritional supplements, diagnostics, medical technology, digital health, life sciences tools, CROs, pharma manufacturing and services. Reverse mergers or minority investments are not included. Acquisitions that were structured as mergers for tax or other reasons are included.

Upfront transaction value is defined in this report as the upfront consideration in cash and/or shares. By contrast, the total transaction value also includes contingent (“biodollar”) payments linked to reaching certain milestones.

Additional data such as invested capital, exit multiples, stage of lead product etc. were collected from various sources. Please note that such data may be based on estimates and may not have been available for all transactions.

Further information about the HBM Pharma/Biotech M&A Report including a list of all transactions can be found under http://www.hbmpartners.com/reports. The use of data and charts is permitted with reference to “HBM Partners Pharma/Biotech M&A Report”.

The authors of the report welcome any feedback or corrections:

Dr Ulrich Geilinger, [email protected] , Dr Chandra Leo, [email protected] and Dr Emil Bujak, [email protected]

HBM Pharma/Biotech M&A Report 2017 Analysis of Biopharma M&A in 2017 (and previous years)

Key Findings

Worldwide biopharma M&A volume of completed deals (including contingent payments

and asset deals) in 2017 dropped to $72.6 billion (as compared to $149 billion in 2016

and $230 billion in 2015).

In 2017, only two deals topped $10 billion: The $30 billion acquisition of Swiss Actelion

by Johnson & Johnson was by far the largest deal in 2017 (and the largest European

biopharma M&A deal since the Sanofi Aventis merger in 2004). The second largest

transaction was Gilead’s $11.2 billion purchase of US Kite Pharma, followed by the

$6.4 billion buyout of German Stada by Bain Capital/Cinven and the $5.2 billion

purchase of US-based Ariad Pharma by Takeda. The largest private deal in 2017 was the

sale of 34-year-old US vaccine company Protein Sciences to Sanofi for $650 million

upfront plus a further $100 million of contingent payments.

US transaction volume was down to $30 billion (company and asset sales). Only 5

significant* public takeovers were reported, the lowest number seen in many years. The

number of 14 significant private transactions was in-line with previous years.

The $30 billion Actelion deal drove up transaction volume from European M&As to

$40 billion. However, the number of transactions was quite low with only 7 trade sales

generating upfront proceeds of $100 million or more.

As in 2015 and 2016, M&A transaction volume outside of the US and Europe in 2017

was modest with a transaction volume of only $2.1 billion.

Return multiples to VC investors from M&A stayed at high levels in 2017, but average

multiples were lower than in the record year of 2016.

* transactions with upfront proceeds of at least $100 million.

Page 2: HBM M&A  · PDF fileHBM Pharma/Biotech M&A Report 2017 ... transactions. Also, the results presented in this report may deviate from our earlier reports due to subsequent

HBM Pharma/Biotech M&A Report 2017

2

Worldwide Biopharma M&A Transaction Volume 2014-2017

Worldwide Biopharma M&A Transaction Volume 2014 -2017

Completed transactions, including asset deals, transaction volume including contingent payments. Europe includes Israel.

Worldwide biopharma M&A volume of completed deals (including contingent payments and

asset deals) in 2017 dropped to $72.6 billion (as compared to $149 billion in 2016 and

$230 billion in 2015). In 2017 only two deals topped $10 billion: The $30 billion acquisition of

Swiss Actelion by Johnson & Johnson and Gilead’s $11.2 billion purchase of US Kite Pharma.

US deal volume was down to $30 billion (company and asset sales) while the $30 billion Actelion

deal drove up transaction volume from European1 M&As to $40 billion.

As in 2016, M&A transaction volume outside of the US and Europe in 2017 was quite low

($2.1 billion). Deal volumes in the years 2014 and 2015 were a bit higher.

2017 was certainly a quiet year for biopharma M&A at a time when new drugs approvals were

strong and stock performance of pharma and biotech was quite good. Maybe high valuations made

public biopharma companies less attractive take-over targets and private companies took

advantage of the open IPO window instead of selling out. One other reason frequently cited is that

US buyers waited for the proposed US tax reform to happen (which includes the tax-efficient

repatriation of overseas profit back to the US). The announcement of major deals right at the start

of 2018 certainly indicate that in 2018 M&A in the pharma sector might increase again.

Interestingly, biopharma M&A transaction volume was also weak outside of the US and Europe

even though countries like China and other economies showed robust growth in the pharma and

healthcare sectors.

Please see next page for list of the larger biopharma M&A transactions in 2017 (including asset

transactions and major transactions announced, but not completed yet before year end).

1 Including Israel.

3Source: HBM Pharma/Biotech M&A Report

15.3 18.3 14.439.6

34.92.9

49.8 1.0

72.2

195.6

77.6

26.8

17.2

7.6

3.7

3.1

11.9

5.8

3.4

2.1

151.6

230.3

148.9

72.6

0

50

100

150

200

2014 2015 2016 2017

Up

fro

nt

Tran

sact

ion

Vo

lum

e ($

bill

ion

)

ROW companies/assets* sold

Assets* of US companies sold

US companies sold

Assets* of EU companies sold

European companies sold

Total Worldwide Biopharma M&A Transaction Volume 2014-2017

Worldwide total biopharma M&A

transaction volume (including contingent

payments) of completed deals,

including sale of assets, subsidiaries,

divisions etc.

* assets, subsidiaries, divisions,

business/product segments

Worldwide biopharma M&A transaction volume (completed transactions)

Page 3: HBM M&A  · PDF fileHBM Pharma/Biotech M&A Report 2017 ... transactions. Also, the results presented in this report may deviate from our earlier reports due to subsequent

HBM Pharma/Biotech M&A Report 2017

3

Table: Largest Completed and Announced Biopharma M&A Transactions in 2017

Notes: Transactions ranked by upfront value Regions and countries (columns 1 and 3): In case of whole companies sold = location of headquarter; in case of asset/division deals = country of business (if available) * = Announced transaction, not completed yet at year end 2017 “Asset/Div.” = Sale of assets, divisions and subsidiaries “Market” = Approved or marketed drugs | “NDA” – NDA filed | “1”, “2” and “3” = Phase 1 2 3, stage of lead product

Target Company/BusinessPublic/

Private

VC/PE-

Backed

Premium

Buyer

Upfront

Deal Value

($m)

Overall

Deal Value

($m)

Phase/Stage

of Lead

Product

VC Invest-

ment ($m)Therapeutic Area(s)

EuropeActelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd /

SwitzerlandPublic 23% Johnson & Johnson / US 30'000 30'000 Market PAH, cardiovascular

US Kite Pharma Inc / US Public 29% Gilead Sciences Inc / US 11'900 11'900 NDA Caner immunotherapies

Europe Stada / Germany Public 60% Bain Capital / Cinven / UK 6'400 6'400 Market Generics

US Ariad Pharmaceuticals Inc / US Public 75% Takeda / Japan 5'200 5'200 Market Cancer

US * Akorn / US Public 47% Fresenius / Germany 4'750 4'750 Market Specialty generics

US * Ignyta / US Public 74% Roche / Switzerland 1'700 1'700 2 Cancer

US * Sucampo / US Public 20% Mallinckrodt / UK 1'200 1'200 3 Genetic orphan diseases

Europe NeuroDerm / Israel Public 17%Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma /

Japan1'100 1'100 3 Parkinsons

US Upsher-Smith (subsidiary Acova) / US Asset/Div. Sawai Pharmaceuticals / Japan 1'050 1'050 Market Generics

US CoLucid Pharmaceuticals Inc / US Public 33% Eli Lilly / US 960 960 3 Migraine

Asia iNova / Australia Asset/Div.Carlyle / Pacific Equity Partners

/ Australia930 930 Market Generics, OTC

US Dendreon (subsidiary Valeant) / US Asset/Div. Sanpower Group / China 820 820 Market Cancer

US Protein Sciences / US Private VC Sanofi / France 650 750 Market Vaccines

Asia Claris Injectables (subs. Claris) / India Asset/Div. Baxter / US 625 625 Market Generics

US SciClone / US/China Public 11% Investor group / China 605 605 Market Specialty pharma China

US Merrimack Pharmaceuticals / US Asset/Div. Ipsen / France 575 1'025 Market Cancer

AsiaUnichem Laboratories (generics

business) / IndiaAsset/Div. Torrent Pharmaceuticals / India 556 556 Market Generics

Europe Ogeda / Belgium Private VC Astellas / Japan 530 850 2 42 Women's health

US True North Therapeutics Inc / US Private VC Bioverativ Therapeutics / US 400 825 1 140 Genetic orphan diseases

Europe * NMS Group / Italy Private SARI / China 362 362 n.a. Oncology, others

US Altor BioScience Corp / US Private VC NantCell / US 360 1'080 2 123 Cancer, inflammation

AsiaWuhan Zhong Yuan Rui De Biological

(sub Humanwell) / ChinaAsset/Div. CSL / Australia 352 352 Market Plasma-derived therapies

ROW Mettrum Health / Canada Public 42% Canopy Growth / Canada 320 320 Market Medical marijuana

US IFM Therapeutics / US Private VC Bristol-Myers Squibb / US 300 1'310 Preclinical 30 Cancer

US Delinia / US Private VC Celgene / US 300 475 Preclinical 35 Autoimmune, cancer

US Aptuit / US Private PE Evotec / Germany 300 300 n.a. Drug discovery

US *The Medicines (infectious disease

business) / USAsset/Div. Melinta Therapeutics / US 270 320 Market Anti-infectives

ROW Merus Labs International / Canada Public 63% Norgine / Netherlands 250 250 Market Various generics

US Mitobridge / US Private VC Astellas / Japan 225 450 1 45 Genetic orphan, duchenne

Europe Quantum / UK Public 18% Clinigen / UK 190 190 MarketEthical access to unlicensed

medicines

US Obagi Medical (subs. Valeant) / US Asset/Div.

Haitong International Zhonghua

Finance Acquisition Fund I /

China

190 190 Market Cosmetics, dermatology

AsiaTanabe Seiyaku Hanbai (generics

business) / JapanAsset/Div. Nipro / Japan 180 180 Market Generics

US Sentynl Therapeutics / US Private Cadila Healthcare / India 171 171 Market Pain

US Vtesse / US Private VC Sucampo / US 170 200 3 42 Genetic orphan diseases

EuropeMerck KGaA Biosimilar Businesss /

GermanyAsset/Div. Fresenius / Germany 167 703 Clinical Biosimilars

Europe Weifa / Norway Public 10% Karo Pharma / Sweden 162 162 Market Generics, OTC in Norway

EuropeIntrathecal Therapy (subs. Mallinckrodt) /

UKAsset/Div. Piramal / India 161 203 Market Severe spasticity

Asia Ambest Pharma / China Private Sihuan Pharmceutical / China 160 160 Market TCM

US Cell Design / US Private VC Gilead / US 157 567 Preclinical 35 Cancer

US Dimension Therapeutics / US Public 358% Ultragenyx / US 151 151 2 Gene therapy

US River Vision Development / US Private VC Horizon Pharma / Ireland 145 145 2 33 Thyroid eye disease, orphan

Europe Generis Pharmaceutica / Portugal Private PE Aurobindo / India 143 143 Market Generics,

Europe Rigontec / Germany Private VC Merck & Co. / US 140 552 2 33Immuno-oncology, drug

discovery RNA

ROW Grupo Pharmaceutico Somar / Mexico Asset/Div. Advent International / US 124 124 Martke Generics, specialty pharma

US Apicore US (subs. Medicure) / US Asset/Div. Undisclosed pharma company / 105 105 Market Cardiovascular

US Neurovance / US Private VC Otsuka / Japan 100 250 2 32Attention-deficit hyperactivity

disorder

ROW Litha Healthcare / South Africa Private Acino Pharma / Switzerland 100 100 Market Generics

Page 4: HBM M&A  · PDF fileHBM Pharma/Biotech M&A Report 2017 ... transactions. Also, the results presented in this report may deviate from our earlier reports due to subsequent

HBM Pharma/Biotech M&A Report 2017

4

Sale of US and European Biopharma Companies (completed deals)

Please note that the M&A transaction data presented in the next pages only relate to the sale of (entire) US and

European biopharma companies with a therapeutic focus. Asset deals, the sale of divisions or subsidiaries, M&A

transactions outside of the US and Europe, and transactions announced (but not completed in 2017) are not

included. For the purpose of this analysis, Israel is included under Europe.

US and European Biopharma Company Trade Sales (Upfront Deal Values)

Completed trade sales of public and private US and European biopharma companies, not including asset deals or purchase of divisions

The number of US and European biopharma company trade sales sold in 2017 was lower than in

previous years. Upfront transaction volume was up for European transactions and down for US

transactions. Quite remarkable was the low deal volume from US transactions. As mentioned

previously, the pending US tax reform might have played a role here.

US and European Biopharma Trade Sales by Upfront Transaction Size

Completed trade sales of public and private US and European biopharma companies, not including asset deals or purchase of divisions

4Source: HBM Pharma/Biotech M&A Report

US & European Biopharma Company Trade Sales*

3.7 8.6 8.020.8 11.1

22.2 15.3 18.3 14.439.6

49.6

171.9

62.348.4

39.230.5

72.2

195.6

77.6 26.811153.3

180.5

70.3 69.2

50.2 52.7

87.5

214.0

92.0

66.4

66 63

74

6471 70 70

98

87

57

0

50

100

150

200

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Upfront Transaction Volume ($ billion)

Number of company

trade sales US & Europe

Completed

European

company

trade sales

Completed

US company

trade sales

Trade sales of public & private US & European biopharma companies (completed transactions)

* not including sale of assets,

subsidiaries, divisions etc.

5Source: HBM Pharma/Biotech M&A Report

2 4 2 1 3 2

10

20

62

22

2 4 18

9

5

7

3

11 6 116

4

11

9

8

9

14

15

13

24

23

11

19

17

26

31

18

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

# o

f Tr

ansa

ctio

ns

<$100m

$100m - $499m

$500m-$999m

>=$1 billion

US & European Biopharma Trade Sales by Upfront Transaction Size

European Transactions

US Transactions

Trade sales of public & private US & European biopharma companies (completed transactions)

Page 5: HBM M&A  · PDF fileHBM Pharma/Biotech M&A Report 2017 ... transactions. Also, the results presented in this report may deviate from our earlier reports due to subsequent

HBM Pharma/Biotech M&A Report 2017

5

The chart on the previous page shows that the number of transactions in 2017 was down in most

size segments with the exception of US deals between $100 million to $500 million upfront which

include the sale of 11 venture-backed biopharma companies in that size bracket.

Two European companies (Actelion and Stada) plus Israeli1 NeuroDerm were sold for over

$1 billion, while the US only saw 2 such deals (Kite and Ariad).

Premiums Paid for Public US and European Biopharma Companies

Premium = increase of stock price on the day of deal announcement. Only deals with an upfront consideration

of at least $100 million are included in this analysis. Given the high degree of variation in premiums paid, the

average numbers should be interpreted with caution.

Premiums Paid for US and European Public Biopharma Companies

Completed trade sales of public US and European biopharma companies with an upfront consideration of at least $100 million. Non-

weighted average premiums.

Premiums paid in 2017 for public US and European biopharma companies dropped to an

average of 31%. One should note that average premiums paid for US companies during 2016

and 2017 would be over 100% if one includes the sale of Tobira in 2016 (premium paid 500%)

and the sale of Dimension Therapeutics in 2017 (358%). Both deals were done at very high

premiums at a time when the stocks of these two companies were quite depressed.

Premiums paid in the US were generally higher than in Europe.

Clinical-stage companies generally received much higher premiums than companies with

approved or marketed products (see table below):

Average Premiums Paid for Public Biopharma Companies Acquired 2013-2017 (for at Least

$100 Million Upfront) by Stage of Lead Product

Phase 2 Phase 3 NDA Filed Approved/

Marketed

Total*

# of public companies sold 8 12 5 45 70

Average premium paid 175% 58% 40% 34% 56%

1 For the purpose of this analysis, Israel is included under Europe.

7Source: HBM Pharma/Biotech M&A Report

62%

36%

47%

77%

57%

29%

60%

36%

71%

37%

69%

31%

57%

28%

36%

46%

25%27%

31%

64%

26%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Ave

rag

eP

rem

ium

Pai

dfo

rP

ub

lic T

akeo

vers

US deals

US & European deals

European deals

Average Premiums Paid for Public BioPharma Companies

US and European public

takeovers with upfront

consideration of at least

$100 million

Trade sales of public US & European biopharma companies (completed transactions)

Excluding sale of Tobira to

Allergan in 2016 (500%

premium) and sale of Dimension

to Ultragenyx in 2017 (358%

premium).

Page 6: HBM M&A  · PDF fileHBM Pharma/Biotech M&A Report 2017 ... transactions. Also, the results presented in this report may deviate from our earlier reports due to subsequent

HBM Pharma/Biotech M&A Report 2017

6

Trade Sales of Private US & European Biopharma Companies

Trade Sales of Private US & European Biopharma Companies

Completed trade sales of private US and European biopharma companies, not including asset deals or purchases of divisions. “Other

private companies” are companies not majority-owned by venture or private equity investors.

The number of private US and European biopharma companies sold and the deal volume they

generated were quite low in 2017 as compared to previous years. And, the bulk of the

transaction volume in private deals was generated by the 22 (mostly US) venture-backed

companies that were sold in 2017 ($3.8 billion upfront, $8.6 billion potential total value).

Only two private-equity-backed pharma companies found a buyer in 2017: German Evotec paid

$300 million for US Aptuit, a drug discovery and services company financed by US buyout fund

Welsh Carson. Portuguese Generis Farmaceutica was purchased by Indian pharma Aurobindo

for $143 million. This manufacturer and supplier of pharmaceutical products has been bought

in 2009 by Magnum Capital. For both transactions there are no return estimates available.

The 19 other private (i.e. not VC- or PE-backed) pharma companies sold generated only a

modest transaction volume of $590 million. One should note that deal terms were only available

in about 50% of these private transactions.

8Source: HBM Pharma/Biotech M&A Report

Trade Sales of Private Biopharma Companies

2.3 1.8 2.3 4.0 2.8 3.4 5.17.4

9.8

3.80.61.7

14.6

10.4 10.310.5

18.2

2.2

0.47.4

6.8

2.1

0.9 1.5

5.0

3.7

1.3

0.62.6

9.810.8

20.7

14.015.2

20.5

29.3

13.3

4.8

36 38

54

42

58

5254

79

70

44

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Up

fro

nt

Tran

sact

ion

Val

ue

($ b

illio

n)

Other private co's

PE-backed co's

VC-backed co'sNumber or private

companies sold

Trade sales of private US & European biopharma companies (completed transactions)

Page 7: HBM M&A  · PDF fileHBM Pharma/Biotech M&A Report 2017 ... transactions. Also, the results presented in this report may deviate from our earlier reports due to subsequent

HBM Pharma/Biotech M&A Report 2017

7

Trade Sales of VC-Backed US and European Biopharma Companies

Trade Sales of Private VC-Backed US and European Biopharma Companies

Completed trade sales of private VC-backed US and European biopharma companies.

Trade sales of the 22 venture-backed biopharma companies generated upfront proceeds of

$3.8 billion (and $8.6 billion in total deal volume including contingent payments). While these

numbers are substantially lower than in 2016 and 2015, they are similar than to the years before

2015.

Trade Sales of Private VC-Backed US Biopharma Companies

Completed trade sales of private VC-backed US biopharma companies.

As the chart above shows, 2017 was a pretty good exit year for US VCs with a good number of

significant transactions. In Europe (chart on next page), there were only 2 noteworthy deals: the

sale of women’s health company Ogeda to Astellas for $530 million upfront (plus $320 million in

milestones) and the acquisition of immuno-oncology company Rigontec by Merck & Co. for

$140 million upfront (plus another $400 million biodollar value).

9Source: HBM Pharma/Biotech M&A Report

Trade Sales of VC-Backed Private Biopharma Companies

2.3 1.8 2.34.0

2.8 3.45.1

7.4 9.8

3.83.5

4.7

4.7

6.77.4

6.8

8.4

20.1

20.9

8.6

24

18

2827

28

2325

3635

22

0

5

10

15

20

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Tran

sact

ion

Val

ue

($ b

illio

n)

Upfront transaction value

Total transaction value

Number of VC-backed

companies sold

Trade sales of private VC-backed US & European biopharma companies

Trade sales of private VC-backed US &

European biopharma companies

Stemcentrx sale to AbbVie

for $5.8bn upfront plus $4bn pot. payments

Acerta sale to AstraZeneca

for $2.5bn upfront plus $4.5bn pot. payments

10Source: HBM Pharma/Biotech M&A Report

Trade Sales of VC-Backed Private Biopharma Companies

1.6 1.11.9

3.6

2.1 2.4

4.53.5

8.1

3.12.6

3.14.0

6.16.6

4.8

7.2

8.7

16.8

7.2

15

10

19

17

23

14

17

2021

18

0

5

10

15

20

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Tran

sact

ion

Val

ue

($ b

illio

n)

Upfront transaction value

Total transaction value

Number of US VC-backed

companies sold

Trade sales of private VC-backed US biopharma companies

Trade sales of private VC-backed US &

European biopharma companies

Stemcentrx sale to AbbVie

for $5.8bn upfront plus $4bn pot. payments

Page 8: HBM M&A  · PDF fileHBM Pharma/Biotech M&A Report 2017 ... transactions. Also, the results presented in this report may deviate from our earlier reports due to subsequent

HBM Pharma/Biotech M&A Report 2017

8

Trade Sales of Private VC-Backed European Biopharma Companies

Completed trade sales of private VC-backed European biopharma companies.

Trade Sales of VC-Backed Oncology Companies

Trade Sales of VC-Backed Oncology Companies – Upfront Transaction Volumes

Completed trade sales of private VC-backed US and European biopharma companies.

2016 was clearly the” year of oncology companies” with the sale of such companies generating 80%

of overall proceeds. In 2017, that value dropped to just $1 billion as there were a good number of

significant deals in anti-infectives and other therapeutic areas. The oncology sector certainly

remained hot in 2017 and some oncology companies probably preferred the IPO route where

valuations were and are high.

11Source: HBM Pharma/Biotech M&A Report

Trade Sales of European VC-Backed Private Biopharma Companies

0.8 0.7 0.3 0.4 0.6 1.0 0.5

3.9

1.60.70.9

1.60.7 0.5 0.7

1.91.2

11.4

4.1

1.4

98

910

5

98

16

14

4

0

5

10

15

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Tran

sact

ion

Val

ue

($ b

illio

n)

Upfront transaction value

Total transaction value

Number of European

VC-backed companies sold

Trade sales of private VC-backed European biopharma companies

Trade sales of private VC-backed

US biopharma companies

Acerta sale to AstraZeneca

for $2.5bn upfront plus $4bn pot. payments

13Source: HBM Pharma/Biotech M&A Report

0.9 0.4

2.1

0.61.5 1.4

3.6

7.9

1.0

0.9 1.8

1.9

2.2

1.9

3.7

3.8

1.9

2.81.82.3

4.0

2.83.4

5.1

7.4

9.8

3.8

0

2

4

6

8

10

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Up

fro

nt

Tran

sact

ion

Vo

lum

e ($

bill

ion

)

Other therapeutic areas

Oncology

Upfront Proceeds from Sale of VC-Backed Oncology Companies

Trade sales of private VC-backed US & European biopharma companies

Trade sales of private VC-backed US &

European biopharma companies

Only for transactions where

respective information was available.

Page 9: HBM M&A  · PDF fileHBM Pharma/Biotech M&A Report 2017 ... transactions. Also, the results presented in this report may deviate from our earlier reports due to subsequent

HBM Pharma/Biotech M&A Report 2017

9

Average Investment Amounts and Transaction Values

Trade Sales of VC-Backed Companies – Av. Investment Amounts & Transaction Values

Completed trade sales of private VC-backed US and European biopharma companies. Only for deals where respective information was

available.

Average1 upfront and average total deal values in 2017 from VC-backed company exits dropped

from the record levels reached in 2016. One should not that median deal values are significantly

lower than average deal values. Average investment amounts - until an exit could be achieved -

remained quite stable.

1 Non-weighted averages

12Source: HBM Pharma/Biotech M&A Report

175

313

203

317 320

376420

692722

477

116 119 103

192

126

190

267 266

348

210

44 58 48 66 56 53 47 49 58 470

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Ave

rag

e V

alu

es ($

mill

ion

)

Average Total Transaction Value

Average Upfront Transaction Value

Average Invested Capital

Average Investment / Average Upfront and Total Deal Values

Trade sales of private VC-backed US &

European biopharma companies

Only for transactions where

respective information was available.

Trade sales of private VC-backed US & European biopharma companies

Noteworthy Venture Exits in 2017

In September 2017, IFM Therapeutics was sold to BMS for $300 million upfront plus potential milestone payments of up to $1 billion. IFM, founded only in 2015, developed therapies that modulate novel targets in the innate immune system to treat cancer, autoimmunity and inflammatory disorders. At the time of the sale, the company was still pre-clinical and investors Atlas, Abingworth and Novartis Venture Fund got a great return on their estimated $30 million investment.

In May 2017, Belgian women's health company Ogeda was sold to Astellas for $530 million upfront plus contingent payments of up to $320 million. The company's lead drug fezolinetant, a selective NK3 receptor antagonist, reported positive data Phase 2a data earlier in the year for non-hormonal treatment of menopause-related vasomotor symptoms ("MR-VMS"). Investors such as Versalius, Capricorn or BNP are estimated to have generated a 10x multiple or more on the roughly $40 million that went into the company.

US Delinia, founded in 2015, was financed in 2016 by Atlas Venture and Paris-based Sofinnova Partners. The company developed novel therapeutics for autoimmune diseases with a focus on regulatory T cells (Tregs). Celgene bought the company for $300 million upfront plus $175 million in contigent payments. A great deal for Atlas (again) and Sofinnova.

Other good exits of VC-backed biopharma companies in 2017 (with an upfront return of at least 3x) were: CellDesign (sold to Gilead), Rigontec (sold to Merck & Co.), MitoBridge (sold to Astellas), Calimmune (sold to CSL), Neurovance (sold to Otsuka), Vtesse (sold to Sucampo), River Vision (sold to Horizon),

Page 10: HBM M&A  · PDF fileHBM Pharma/Biotech M&A Report 2017 ... transactions. Also, the results presented in this report may deviate from our earlier reports due to subsequent

HBM Pharma/Biotech M&A Report 2017

10

Contingent Payments

Trade Sales of VC-Backed Companies – Contingent Payments

Completed trade sales of private VC-backed US and European biopharma companies. Only for deals where respective information was

available.

As mentioned in our last year’s report, contingent payments (as percentage of total deal values)

have increased substantially since 2009 (see chart above). The sum of contingent payments in 2017

and the two years before were close to 50% of total deal values, i.e. the potential future payments

to sellers are not much less than the upfront considerations.

It should be noted that, according to a recent study by SRS Acquiom1 about 40% of the milestones

for such contingent payments are usually reached, i.e. sellers can - on average- expect further

payments corresponding to roughly 20% of the upfront proceeds.

Investor Returns from the Sale of VC-Backed Biopharma Companies

We have approximated the return multiples for venture investors from biopharma trade sales using the ratio of

upfront (and total) proceeds divided by invested capital. To calculate the average multiples in a given year, we

have divided the sum of exit values (upfront or including contingent payments) by aggregate VC investments.

These averages, weighted by deal size, provide – in our view – a good indicator of the overall exit performance

in a given year. Non-weighted averages (included in the chart below as well) were generally a bit higher and

medians generally a bit lower.

The valuations paid by investors in private biopharma companies are generally higher than the invested capital

(as some of the fully-diluted equity belongs to founders, management etc.). Therefore, the multiples shown here

are about 20-25% higher than the actual investor returns.

1 https://www.srsacquiom.com/resources/2017-srs-acquiom-life-sciences-ma-study/

14Source: HBM Pharma/Biotech M&A Report

Contingent „Biodollar“ Payments as % of Total Deal Value

6

0

4 3 3 3 3 4 42

2

2

26

3 24 2 1 4

1

6

4

3

5 8 59

8 7

14%

62%

33%31%

37%39% 39%

48% 47%43%

0

5

10

15

20

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

# o

f Tr

ansa

ctio

ns

Over 50% contingent payments

Up to 50% contingent payments

No contingent payments

Average

contingent

payments in %

total deal value

(not weighted by

deal size)

Trade sales of VC-Backed US

and European companies

with total upfront

consideration of at least

$100 million

Trade sales of private VC-backed US & European biopharma companies

Trade sales of private VC-backed US &

European biopharma companies

Only for transactions where

respective information was available.

Page 11: HBM M&A  · PDF fileHBM Pharma/Biotech M&A Report 2017 ... transactions. Also, the results presented in this report may deviate from our earlier reports due to subsequent

HBM Pharma/Biotech M&A Report 2017

11

Trade Sales of VC-Backed Companies – Investment Multiples

Completed trade sales of private VC-backed US and European biopharma companies. Only for deals where respective information was

available.

Investment multiples (non-weighted and weighted) have shown a significant upward trend

since 2010. However, 2017 returns were clearly below the record 2016 numbers.

The upfront multiples achieved in 2017 from European exits were better in 2017 than from US

deals. However, there were just two significant exits (Ogeda 12.5x and Rigontec 4.3x) and, thus,

the 2017 number is not really representative.

Trade Sales of VC-Backed Companies – Investment Multiples US vs. Europe

Completed trade sales of private VC-backed US and European biopharma companies. Only for deals where respective information was

available.

17Source: HBM Pharma/Biotech M&A Report

Average Investment Multiples On Upfront and Total Deal Value

3.8x

5.1x

3.9x4.5x

6.4x7.1x

9.4x

13.1x

14.8x

11.3x

2.5x 1.9x 1.8x

2.7x2.3x

3.6x

5.7x4.9x

6.7x

4.5x

2.9x

1.9x

3.0x3.6x

5.0x4.2x

6.5x

7.3x

6.4x

4.3x

0

5

10

15

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Rat

io /

Mu

ltip

leWeighted-average investment multiple (on totaltransaction value)

Weighted-average investment multiple (onupfront transaction value)

(Non-Weighted) average investment multiple (onupfront transaction value)

Trade sales of private VC-backed US & European biopharma companies

Actual investor multiples

approx. 20%-25% lower!

Trade sales of private VC-backed US &

European biopharma companies

Only for transactions where

respective information was available.

16Source: HBM Pharma/Biotech M&A Report

Average Investment Multiples On Upfront Deal Value – US vs. Europe

2.0x 2.0x 2.0x

3.2x

2.7x

3.4x

6.6x

6.0x

7.3x

3.9x

3.4x

1.9x

1.2x 1.2x1.5x

4.2x

2.6x

4.3x

3.7x

8.9x

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Rat

io /

Mu

ltip

le

US - Weighted-average investment multiples (on upfront)

Europe - Weighted-average investment multiples (on upfront)

Trade sales of private VC-backed US & European biopharma companies

Actual investor multiples

approx. 20%-25% lower!

Trade sales of private VC-backed US &

European biopharma companies

Only for transactions where

respective information was available.

Page 12: HBM M&A  · PDF fileHBM Pharma/Biotech M&A Report 2017 ... transactions. Also, the results presented in this report may deviate from our earlier reports due to subsequent

HBM Pharma/Biotech M&A Report 2017

12

Our return data also indicate that in recent years early exits (i.e. at early stages of clinical

development and when less money has been invested) generated higher multiples (see chart

below).

Trade Sales of VC-Backed Companies – Investment Multiples by Stage of Lead Product

Completed trade sales of private US and European VC-backed biopharma companies. Stage of lead product at time of company sale. Investment multiples non-weighted.

Zug, 24 February 2018

The authors of the report welcome any feedback or corrections:

Dr. Ulrich Geilinger, [email protected] , Dr. Chandra Leo, [email protected]

and Dr Emil Bujak, [email protected]

17Source: HBM Pharma/Biotech M&A Report

Average Multiples by Stage

8.7x

5.8x5.4x

4.6x5.0x

4.7x

5.4x

4.7x 4.7x4.2x

4.6x

3.9x

2.5x

3.7x 3.9x 3.7x3.3x 3.2x

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Pre-clinical Phase I Phase II Phase III NDA Approved

No

n-W

eig

hte

dIn

vest

men

t Mu

ltip

les

2013-2017

All (2008-2017)

2008-2012

Trade sales of private VC-backed US & European biopharma companies

Actual investor multiples

approx. 20%-25% lower!

Trade sales of private VC-backed US &

European biopharma companies

Only for transactions where

respective information was available.

About HBM Partners

HBM Partners is among the global leaders in healthcare-focused investing with over $1.5 billion in assets under management. HBM focuses on development stage, growth and buy-out financings of private and public biopharma, medical device and diagnostics companies. Investments in private companies usually range between $10 million to $50 million.

HBM Partners advises HBM Healthcare Investments AG, HBM BioCapital as well as specialized public equity funds. HBM Partners has been an active contributor to value creation in its portfolio companies, generating over 50 trade sales and IPOs since its inception in 2001.

HBM Partners AG, CH-6300 Zug, Switzerland, www.hbmpartners.com, phone +41 43 888 71 71