HAYES CREEK PROJECT MINING MANAGEMENT PLAN 0804-01 … · 2018. 6. 26. · Hayes Creek Project –...
Transcript of HAYES CREEK PROJECT MINING MANAGEMENT PLAN 0804-01 … · 2018. 6. 26. · Hayes Creek Project –...
HAYES CREEK PROJECT
MINING MANAGEMENT PLAN 0804-01-V1
March 2018 Ammendment
Rockland Resources Pty Ltd
Emirates House
Level 7, 167 Eagle Street
Brisbane, QLD 4000
Tel: +61 (0)7 3135 9770
Fax: +61 (0)7 3135 9772
Email: [email protected]
Web: www.rocklandresources.com.au
Authorsation: Geoff Beckitt (Exploration Manager)
Date: 12.03.2018
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
COPYRIGHT © Rockland Resources Pty Ltd 2018
This document and its contents are the copyright of Rockland Resources Pty Ltd. The document is for
submitting to the Department of Mines and Energy of the Northern Territory, as part of the Mine
Management Reporting requirements of the Minerals Titles Act 2010. Any information included in this report
that originates from historical reports or other sources is listed in the ‘References’ section at the end of this
document. Rockland Resources Pty Ltd authorizes the Department of Mines and Energy to copy and
distribute the report and associated data.
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
TOC
CONTENTS
1. AMENDMENTS ........................................................................................................................................ 1
2. OPERATOR DETAILS ................................................................................................................................. 3
3. ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE ................................................................................................................ 4
3.1 WORKFORCE ............................................................................................................................................. 4
4. PROJECT DETAILS ..................................................................................................................................... 6
4.1 MAP OF SITE LOCATION AND LAYOUT ............................................................................................................ 7
4.2 HISTORY OF DEVELOPMENT AND CURRENT STATUS........................................................................................... 9
4.2.1 Historical Mining Exploration ........................................................................................................... 9
4.2.2 Disturbing Activities by Rockland Resources and MMP History of Changes ................................... 12
4.3 PROPOSED ACTIVITIES ............................................................................................................................... 19
5. CURRENT PROJECT SITE CONDITIONS .................................................................................................... 22
5.1 GEOLOGY ............................................................................................................................................... 22
5.2 HYDROGEOLOGY ...................................................................................................................................... 22
5.3 FLORA .................................................................................................................................................... 23
5.4 FAUNA ................................................................................................................................................... 23
5.5 PEST SPECIES ........................................................................................................................................... 23
5.6 LAND USE ............................................................................................................................................... 24
5.7 HISTORICAL, ABORIGINAL, HERITAGE SITES ................................................................................................... 25
6. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM/PLAN ................................................................................. 27
6.1 ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND RESPONSIBILITY............................................................................................... 28
6.2 STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS ....................................................................................................................... 28
6.3 NON-STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................................... 29
6.4 IDENTIFIED STAKEHOLDER AND CONSULTATION .............................................................................................. 29
6.5 INDUCTION AND TRAINING ......................................................................................................................... 29
6.6 IDENTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND ASPECTS ........................................................................... 31
6.6.1 Water Management ....................................................................................................................... 34
6.6.2 Invasive Species Management ........................................................................................................ 34
6.6.3 Flora and Fauna Management ....................................................................................................... 34
6.6.4 Waste Management ....................................................................................................................... 35
6.6.5 Cultural and Heritage Management ............................................................................................... 35
6.6.6 Hazardous Material and Hydrocarbon Management ..................................................................... 35
6.7 EMERGENCY PROCEDURES AND INCIDENT REPORTING ..................................................................................... 36
6.8 ENVIRONMENTAL AUDITS AND INSPECTIONS .................................................................................................. 37
6.9 ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE REPORTING................................................................................................ 38
7. EXPLORATION REHABILITATION ............................................................................................................ 39
8. COSTING OF CLOSURE ACTIVITIES.......................................................................................................... 43
8.1 LEGACY SECURITY ..................................................................................................................................... 43
8.2 NEW SECURITY ........................................................................................................................................ 43
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
TOC
9. PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................................. 44
10. REFERENCES ...................................................................................................................................... 45
11. APPENDICIES ..................................................................................................................................... 45
8.3 APPENDIX A OPERATOR NOMINATION .......................................................................................................... A
8.4 APPENDIX B PREVIOUS SECURITY CALCULATIONS ............................................................................................ B
8.5 APPENDIX C REGISTRY OF DISTURBED SITES ................................................................................................... C
8.6 APPENDIX D NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT .......................................................................................... D
8.7 APPENDIX E LANDHOLDER DETAILS AND LAND ACCESS AGREEMENT ................................................................... E
8.8 APPENDIX F AAPA SEARCH REPORTS ........................................................................................................... F
8.9 APPENDIX G HERITAGE SITE SEARCH REPORTS .............................................................................................. G
8.10 APPENDIX H HISTORIC SITE SEARCH REPORT ..................................................................................................H
8.11 APPENDIX I RADIATION MANAGEMENT PLAN .................................................................................................. I
8.12 APPENDIX J S29 REPORTING GUIDELINE ........................................................................................................ J
8.13 APPENDIX K DME ADVISORY NOTES ............................................................................................................ K
8.14 APPENDIX L INDUCTION AND TRAINING ......................................................................................................... L
8.15 APPENDIX M SECURITY CALCULATION.......................................................................................................... M
8.16 APPENDIX N CROCODILE GOLD CONFIRMATION LETTER RE BROCKS CORE STORAGE ............................................. N
8.17 APPENDIX O SECURITY CALCULATION FOR BROCKS CORE STORAGE ................................................................... O
FIGURES
Figure 1 Organisation Chart ................................................................................................................... 4
Figure 2 Tenement Location Plan .......................................................................................................... 8
Figure 3 Disturbance Summary (Red = Open, Blue = Closed and Green = Monitoring) ..................... 18
Figure 4 Yam Ck Area 13 Possible Holes and 1 Possible Costean (yellow) overlying 2012 Imagery ... 21
TABLES
Table 1 Listing of MMP Document History ............................................................................................. 1
Table 2 Operator Details ......................................................................................................................... 3
Table 3 Project Details ............................................................................................................................ 6
Table 4 Exploration License Details ........................................................................................................ 6
Table 5 Mining License Details ................................................................................................................ 7
Table 6 Summary of Legacy ground disturbing exploration activities by Thundelarra by Exploration
Licence. ................................................................................................................................................. 11
Table 7 Summary of Legacy ground disturbing exploration activities by Thundelarra by Mining
Licence. ................................................................................................................................................. 12
Table 8 Summary of Remaining Rehabilitation .................................................................................... 15
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
TOC
Table 9 Summary of ground disturbing exploration activities by Rockland Resources since June 2014
by Exploration License. ......................................................................................................................... 16
Table 10 Summary of ground disturbing exploration activities by Rockland Resources since June
2014 by Mining License. ........................................................................................................................ 17
Table 11 Summary of proposed ground disturbing exploration activities by Rockland Resources at
Yam Ck. .................................................................................................................................................. 20
Table 12 List of environmental aspects and impacts related to exploration activities ........................ 31
Table 13 Thunderball Area Radiation Monitoring Sites ..................................................................... 37
Table 14 Table of Rehabilitation Activities ........................................................................................... 39
Table 15 Summary of Security Calculation from Appendix M ............................................................. 43
Table 16 Table of Environmental Objectives ........................................................................................ 44
APPENDICES
Appendix A Operator Nomination ................................................................................. A
Appendix B Security Calculation Legacy ........................................................................ B
Appendix C Registry of Disturbed Sites ......................................................................... C
Appendix D Natural Resource Management ................................................................... D
Appendix E Landholder Details ..................................................................................... E
Appendix F AAPA Search Reports ................................................................................. F
Appendix G Heritage Site Search Reports ...................................................................... G
Appendix H Historic Site Search Report ......................................................................... H
Appendix I Radiation Management Plan ......................................................................... I
Appendix J S29 Reporting Guideline............................................................................... J
Appendix K DME Advisory Notes ............................................................................................................ K
Appendix L Induction and Training ......................................................................................................... L
Appendix M Security Calculation ........................................................................................................... M
Appendix N Crocodile Gold Confirmation Letter Re Brocks Core Storage ............................................. N
Appendix O Security Calculation for Brocks Core Storage ..................................................................... O
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
Page | 1
1. AMENDMENTS
Table 1 Listing of MMP Document History
Date Section Amendment
1/5/2014 Entire Document This MMP is the initial Plan submitted by Rockland Resources Pty Ltd, the proponent for the project.
11/6/2014 Initial authorization issued 0804-01
30/10/2014 Proposed Activities
Security Summary
This MMP amendment is specifically for the establishment of core storage at Brocks Creek
15/6/2015 4 Project Details Simplified to only list main licenses where work has been done or is planned.
4.2.1Historical Mining/Exploration
Captures aspects related to rehab of Rockland and legacy Thundelarra sites.
4.4.4 Disturbing Activities by Rockland Resources
Captures aspects related to rehab of Rockland and legacy Thundelarra sites.
6.6 Identification of Environmental Impacts and Aspects
Expanded section to address feedback from previous MMP: management for dust, water, waste and weed aspects, and list of likely environmental emergencies /responses
8.1 Security
Calculation
Overview and update for calculation based on rehab work
and audits
30/6/2015 3.0 Project Details Reduced the number of titles in the MMP to just those that
are necessary due to current/legacy activity
3.3.3 Disturbing
Activities by Rockland
Reduced the number of titles in the MMP to just those that
are necessary due to current/legacy activity
3.3 Proposed Activities Reduced the number of titles in the MMP to just those that
are necessary due to current/legacy activity
16/7/2015 Revised MMP accepted as MMP 0804-01-V1
14/8/2015 Separate rehab report Rehab report incorporates Rockland rehabilitation and also
department site visit feedback (24th June 2015)
4.2 History of
Development and
Current Status
Updated as per rehab report
8.1 Security Summary Update as per rehab report
20/5/2016 Yearly update with no material changes – no significant
new rehab and no major disturbances are planned (just
rehab monitoring).
12/3/2018 29/3/2017
Background Info
A revised MMP was submitted but never approved. The
department asked for evidence of a Land Access
Agreement (LAA) with the Postural Lease holder. It was
realized that the Pastoral Lease holder had changed hands
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
TOC
and there were significant problems establishing a new
agreement with the new land holder - right through until
2018.
General References to Crocodile Gold changed to Kirkland Lake
Gold due to name change / merger.
Tom Northcott is no longer with the company (was
Managing Director)
2.0 Operator Details Minor change to contact details (ph)
Updates to the nomination of operator information
4.0 Project Details Update because PNX Metals has acquired 51% of
exploration licenses held by New Market Gold NL
4.3 Proposed Activities Proposed exploration: costean and drilling at Yam Ck.
5.6 Land Use Clarified aspects related to pastor lease and new Land
Access Agreement with Douglas Station.
8.1 Security Summary Proposed exploration: costean and drilling at Yam Ck.
Appendices Minor Updates to: Operation Nominator, Legacy Security
Calculation, Registry of Disturbed Sites, Landholder details,
DME Advisory Notes and New Security Calculation
Web Availability The currently approved MMP is available on the web at the
following site:
http://www.rocklandresources.com.au/presentations.html
*Note: Current document amendments highlighted in yellow throughout this report
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
Page | 3
2. OPERATOR DETAILS
Rockland Resources Pty Ltd (ABN: 99 149 709 713) has tenements registered under it’s wholly owned
subsidiary called Oz Uranium Pty Ltd (ABN: 98 164 615 749), which are both registered with ASIC. Rockland
Resources is a privately owned Australian Exploration company with activities in the Northern Territory and
state of Queensland (see Table 2).
The company is predominantly focused on the discovery of economic uranium.
Table 2 Operator Details
Operator Name: Rockland Resources Pty Ltd
Key Contact and
Responsible Person/s:
Thomas Northcott – Managing Director
Geoff Beckitt – Exploration Manager
Postal Address:
GPO Box 3245, Brisbane, QLD, 4001
Street Address:
Level 7, 167 Eagle Street, Brisbane
Phone: 0458930000
Fax:
Email: [email protected]
At the time of writing the transfer documents had been lodged with Titles (25 April 2014) and were awaiting
ratification. Once ratified, Rockland will nominate itself as the operator to allow the MMP authority to be
issued.
Rockland Resources is also in the process of submitting the nomination form as operator for the contiguous
Joint Venture ground with Crocodile Gold Pty Ltd (Crocodile Gold - CGAO).
The Operator Nominations are included as Appendix A for Rockland Resources to be the operator on ground
held by Oz Uranium Pty Ltd (the subsidiary), Newmarket Gold NT Holdings Pty Ltd, PNX Metals Ltd, Dale Page
and Yogi Griesbach as per the tenement listing in Table 4 and Table 5.
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
TOC
3. ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE
Rockland Resource organisation chart is shown in Figure 1. The chart shows that the Exploration Manager
and Administration Support report to the Managing Director. The consulting geologists, safety officer and
field personnel report to the Managing Director and Exploration Manager.
The Responsible Persons for the project are Thomas Northcott, Managing Director and is Geoff Beckitt,
Exploration Manager; who are responsible for maintaining the MMP and ensuring compliance of activities.
Figure 1 Organisation Chart
3.1 Workforce
During field activities the senior personnel on site will consist of either the Exploration Manager or a Senior
Consulting Geologist. They will be responsible for all aspect of the field activities including those that relate
to technical, safety, environmental and field programs.
Specialist technical geoscientists may be on site for activities such as structural mapping and drill-core
logging.
Junior geologists and field personnel will be employed on a casual basis to assist with sampling, mapping and
drill-core activities.
Contractors during the season will have their own teams of personnel for drilling (i.e. up to 5 personnel),
track and rehabilitation works (i.e. up to 2 personnel).
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
Page | 5
All contractors and staff will reside in demountable accommodation at the Crocodile Gold Cosmo
Village (located at the corner of Dorat and Oolloo Roads). An alternative is to utilise the Hayes Creek
or Emerald Springs Roadhouses.
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
Page | 6
4. PROJECT DETAILS
The project details are listed in Table 3. The project consists of a number of contiguous exploration
licences listed in Table 4 and also mining leases listed in Table 5. The licences are: EL 25553, EL
10120, EL 25120, EL 27363, EL 25379, EL 23509, EL 23431, EL 24018, MLN1139 and ML29933.
The licences consist of those owned by Oz Uranium (wholly owned subsidiary of Rockland
Resources) and also those where there is a current joint venture for the uranium with Kirkland River
Gold P/L (previously Crocodile Gold Australia P/L and Newmarket Gold P/L).
In June 2015, MMP authorisation 0804-01 was amended to only reference those tenements where
there is legacy ground disturbance due to activities by Thundelarra (wholly owned by Element 92) or
where Oz Uranium (wholly owned by Rockland Resources) has or intends to conduct ground
disturbing exploration activities. This has significantly reduced the number of exploration and mining
licences which will simplify future amendments.
Table 3 Project Details
Project Name: Hayes Creek Project
Location:
The Hayes Creek project is also referred to by Crocodile Gold as the Burnside Project. It
is situated 120 km south of Darwin along the Stuart Highway. The Stuart Highway pass
through the project and the Hayes Creek road-house is situated in the south east
corner of the project.
Site Access:
Access to the various tenements is via secondary dirt roads (i.e. Groves Hill Rd) and
tracks. The project falls within the Pine Creek 1:250,000 Mapsheet.
Table 4 Exploration License Details
Exploration Title Holder Rockland (Oz Uranium Pty Ltd) %
EL 25553 Oz Uranium Pty Ltd 100% (all commodities)
EL 10120 Oz Uranium Pty Ltd 100% (all commodities)
EL 25120 Oz Uranium Pty Ltd 100% (all commodities)
EL 27363 Oz Uranium Pty Ltd 100% (all commodities)
EL 25379 Oz Uranium Pty Ltd 100% (all commodities)
EL 23509 Oz Uranium Pty Ltd 100% (all commodities)
EL 23431 Newmarket Gold NT Holdings Pty Ltd (49%)
PNX Metals Limited (51%) 100% (uranium only)
EL 24018 Newmarket Gold NT Holdings Pty Ltd (49%)
PNX Metals Limited (51%) 100% (uranium only)
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
Page | 7
Table 5 Mining License Details
Mining Title Holder Rockland (Oz Uranium Pty Ltd) %
MLN1139 Newmarket Gold NT Holdings Pty Ltd 100% (uranium only)
ML29933
Oz Uranium Pty Ltd 80%,
Dale Page 10% and
Yogi Griesbach 10%
80% (all commodities)
4.1 Map of Site Location and Layout
The Hayes Creek project is also referred to as the Burnside Project by other explorers in the area. It
is situated 120 km south of Darwin along the Stuart Highway. The Stuart Highway pass through the
project and the Hayes Creek road-house is situated in the south east corner of the project. The
location of the Hayes Creek Project and Tenements are shown in Figure 2.
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
Page | 8
Figure 2 Tenement Location Plan
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
Page | 9
4.2 History of Development and Current Status
4.2.1 Historical Mining Exploration
The project area has undergone historic exploration and development spanning over 140 years of
historical prospecting and mining and several waves of modern exploration and development in the
1980s, 1990s and during the early part of this decade. A total of over 3.7 million ounces of gold have
been produced from the Pine Creek Orogen and it has been estimated that in excess of 3 million
ounces have been produced from the project area. It is estimated that over 750,000 m of drilling
have been completed.
Within Hayes Creek there are a number of historical Mine Sites including Woolwonga, Yam Creek,
Davies, Mount Bonnie, Iron Blow and Golden Dyke. Environmental care, maintenance and
monitoring activities are ongoing by Kirkland River Gold P/L within the project area. Environmental
activities included as part of the site’s care and maintenance status includes flora and fauna
monitoring, weed mapping, inspections, fire management, heritage and water monitoring (surface
and groundwater).
Kirkland River Gold P/L is currently mining at the Cosmo Howley Gold Mine. Exploration is being
carried out by Kirkland River Gold P/L and PNX Metals P/L in overlapping and adjoining areas to the
ground explored by Rockland Resources.
Thundelarra operated from 2008 which included track works and drilling pads. Their operation was
carried out under MMP Authority Number 0437-04. During the life of the Authorization and its
precursors 185 RC (13 with diamond tails) and 16 Diamond Holes were drilled and sufficient pads
and tracks were cleared to allow for the drilling. In addition 9 costeans were dug. Almost all holes
and all costeans were rehabilitated in line with the authorisation. Most access tracks were
rehabilitated, although some have been left open to facilitate any future exploration.
In October 2013, the Department of Mining and Energy accepted a rehabilitation report for the
majority of these works covered by the Authority. Following a rehabilitation report from Thundelarra
the department calculated a withheld security of $17,954, as shown in Appendix B for the closure of
historical activities, rehabilitation of 11 holes and rehabilitation of 6.6 km of track. Rockland
Resources has taken on this environment legacy as part of the purchase of the project. The legacy
activities for the exploration and mining licences respectively are shown in Table 6 and
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
TOC
Table 7.
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
Page | 11
Table 6 Summary of Legacy ground disturbing exploration activities by Thundelarra by Exploration
Licence.
Note 1: The values for existing disturbed ground are taken directly from the Register of Disturbed Sites – Hayes Creek Project contained in
Appendix C.
Exp
lora
tio
n In
tere
sts
(i.e
. tit
les)
Nu
mb
er
of
ho
les
dri
lled
Typ
e
of
ho
les
dri
lled
(i
.e.
RA
B,
RC
, D
DH
,
Air
core
)
Max
imu
m d
ep
th o
f h
ole
s (m
)
Nu
mb
er
of
dri
ll p
ads
cle
are
d
Nu
mb
er
of
sum
ps
cle
are
d
Dri
llin
g D
istu
rban
ce (
ha
)
Trac
ks L
en
gth
cle
are
d (
m)
Trac
ks D
istu
rban
ce (
ha)
Are
a o
f co
ste
ans
exc
avat
ed
(h
a)
Are
a To
tal b
ulk
sam
ple
pit
s (h
a)
Co
re F
arm
(h
a)
Tota
l are
a d
istu
rbe
d (
ha)
Tota
l are
a re
hab
ilita
ted
(h
a)
Re
hab
Sta
tus
Unspecified Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil 5000 2.5 Nil Nil Nil 2.5 2.5 Closed
EL 25553 3 RC 198 3 3 .0675 Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil .0675 .0675 Nil
EL 10120 5 RC 135 5 5 .1125 1500 .75 Nil Nil Nil .8625 .8625 Closed
EL 25120 Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
EL 27363 1 RC 192 1 1 .025 Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil .025 .025 Closed
EL 25379 Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
EL 23509 1 RC 220 1 1 .025 Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil .025 .025
Rehabbed –
minor weed
monitoring
EL 23431 8 RC 217 8 8 .18 1300 .65 Nil Nil Nil .83 .18
Thunderball
track open,
All holes
rehabbed -
but 3 are
monitored
for erosion
and one for
weeds.
EL 24018 Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
TOTAL 18 18 18 .41 7.8 3.9 4.31 4.13
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
TOC
Table 7 Summary of Legacy ground disturbing exploration activities by Thundelarra by Mining
Licence.
M
inin
g In
tere
sts
(i.e
. tit
les)
Nu
mb
er
of
ho
les
dri
lled
Typ
e o
f h
ole
s d
rille
d (
i.e
. RA
B, R
C, D
DH
, Air
core
)
Max
imu
m d
ep
th o
f h
ole
s (m
)
Nu
mb
er
of
dri
ll p
ads
cle
are
d
Nu
mb
er
of
sum
ps
cle
are
d
Dri
llin
g D
istu
rban
ce (
ha)
Trac
ks L
en
gth
cle
are
d (
m)
Trac
ks D
istu
rban
ce (
ha)
Are
a o
f co
ste
ans
exca
vate
d (
ha)
Are
a To
tal b
ulk
sam
ple
pit
s (h
a)
Co
re F
arm
(h
a)
Tota
l are
a d
istu
rbe
d (
ha)
Tota
l are
a re
hab
ilita
ted
(h
a)
MLN1139 Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
ML29933 Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
Note 1: The values for existing disturbed ground are taken directly from the Register of Disturbed Sites – Hayes Creek Project contained in
Appendix C.
4.2.2 Disturbing Activities by Rockland Resources and MMP History of Changes
On 11th June 2014, an initial MMP authority 0804-01 was issued to Rockland Resources for the
purpose of 28 new drill holes and track works of which most were contingency and in the end only
eight sites were prepared in 2014 (eight holes were drilled at seven of these sites) by Rockland
Resources. In addition the MMP incorporated the Thundelarra legacy of 11 holes and 6.6 km of
track.
On 30th October 2014, an amendment was submitted for the establishment of a core storage area
adjacent to the historical Brocks administration area within mining licence MLN1139.
On 15th June 2015, an MMP amendment was made to incorporate rehabilitation aspects and
accommodate department amendments from the original MMP.
On 30th June 2015, an MMP amendment was made to reduce the licences to only those actually
relating to current or past disturbances.
On 21st July 2015, a revised MMP was accepted as 0804-01-V1.
On 14th August 2015, an MMP amendment was submitted which incorporated feedback from a site
visit by the Department of Mines (MR2015/0245) and also rehabilitation activities by Rockland
Resources. Remaining rehabilitation is for the track to Thunderball which is still open, Brocks core
storage, and monitoring of erosion/weeds at various sites.
The Registry of Disturbance (including legacy from Thundelarra) has been submitted with this report
both in digital format (Microsoft Excel) and in Adobe PDF format as Appendix C. Figure 3 shows the
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
TOC
current status of disturbing work classified as open, closed and monitoring. The status of disturbance
and rehabilitation is summarised in Table 8. Ground disturbing activities based on the exploration
and mining licences respectively are shown in
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
Page | 14
Table 9 and Table 10.
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
Page | 15
Table 8 Summary of Remaining Rehabilitation
Disturbance Disturbed
(ha)
Remaining
Rehab (ha)
Remaining Rehab Comments
Drill Sites .41 0 All holes are fully rehabbed
One of Rockland Resource’s holes requires monitoring for
minor weeds.
Three Thundelarra holes requires monitoring for erosion and
one hole requires monitoring for weeds
Tracks 3.9 .65 The Thunderball Deposit track (1.3 km - .65 ha) is still open
and requires some spraying of minor weeds in March 2016:
A track to Thunderball Extended has been rehabbed but
requires monitoring for minor weeds (Hyptis was pulled from
a drill site),
Core
Storage
0 0 A storage area has been established at Brocks which houses
five shipping containers with drill core, chips and standards
etc (.08 ha). This area requires some spraying of minor weeds
to keep usable and not a fire hazard, however, it is within the
broader mining lease maintained by Kirkland River Gold P/L.
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
Page | 16
Table 9 Summary of ground disturbing exploration activities by Rockland Resources since June 2014 by Exploration License.
Note 1: The values for existing disturbed ground are taken directly from the Register of Disturbed Sites – Hayes Creek Project contained in Appendix C.
Min
ing
Inte
rest
s (i
.e. t
itle
s)
Nu
mb
er
of
ho
les
dri
lled
Typ
e o
f h
ole
s d
rille
d (
i.e
. RA
B, R
C, D
DH
, Air
core
)
Max
imu
m d
ep
th o
f h
ole
s (m
)
Nu
mb
er
of
dri
ll p
ads
cle
are
d
Nu
mb
er
of
sum
ps
cle
are
d
Dri
llin
g D
istu
rban
ce (
ha)
Trac
ks L
en
gth
cle
are
d (
m)
Trac
ks D
istu
rban
ce (
ha)
Are
a o
f co
ste
ans
exca
vate
d (
ha)
Are
a To
tal b
ulk
sam
ple
pit
s (h
a)
Co
re F
arm
(h
a)
Tota
l are
a d
istu
rbe
d (
ha)
Tota
l are
a re
hab
ilita
ted
(h
a)
Re
hab
Sta
tus
EL 25553 Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
EL 10120 Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
EL 25120 Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
EL 27363 Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
EL 25379 Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
EL 23509 1 DDH 159 1 1 0.025 0 0 Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
Rehabbed -
left open
to monitor
weeds
EL 23431 5 DDH 245 6 6 0.0900 200 .1 Nil Nil Nil 0.19 0.19 Closed
EL 24018 3 DDH 99 3 3 0.0675 100 0.05 Nil Nil Nil 0.1175 0.1175 Closed
TOTAL 9 10 10 .1825 300 .15 .3075 .3075
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
Page | 17
Table 10 Summary of ground disturbing exploration activities by Rockland Resources since June 2014 by Mining License.
M
inin
g In
tere
sts
(i.e
. tit
les)
Nu
mb
er
of
ho
les
dri
lled
Typ
e
of
ho
les
dri
lled
(i
.e.
RA
B,
RC
, D
DH
,
Air
core
)
Max
imu
m d
ep
th o
f h
ole
s (m
)
Nu
mb
er
of
dri
ll p
ads
cle
are
d
Nu
mb
er
of
sum
ps
cle
are
d
Dri
llin
g D
istu
rban
ce (
ha
)
Trac
ks L
en
gth
cle
are
d (
m)
Trac
ks D
istu
rban
ce (
ha)
Are
a o
f co
ste
ans
exc
avat
ed
(h
a)
Are
a To
tal b
ulk
sam
ple
pit
s (h
a)
Co
re F
arm
(h
a)
Tota
l are
a d
istu
rbe
d (
ha)
Tota
l are
a re
hab
ilita
ted
(h
a)
MLN1139 Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
0 –
Already
disturbed
0 Nil
Note 1: The values for existing disturbed ground are taken directly from the Register of Disturbed Sites – Hayes Creek Project contained in Appendix C.
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
Page | 18
Figure 3 Disturbance Summary (Red = Open, Blue = Closed and Green = Monitoring)
Thunderball Insert
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
Page | 19
4.3 Proposed Activities
The present new MMP update is to outline disturbance relating to drill holes and a costean (trench)
proposed for the Yam Ck area within EL10120 for 2018. For reference purposes, the work is also
within the overlapping mining lease ML29933. The costean and drill holes are to help assess the
mineral potential for the area. Table 11 summarises the proposed activity. The Yam Creek alluvial
gold mining area is also known as the Priscilla Line and it includes the Priscilla Prospect (gold). The
area has been subject to more than a century of alluvial mining and land disturbance including more
recent gravel mining and alluvial operations by Dale Page and Yogi Griesbach (who operate under
separate MMPs). There are several established tracks and the ground is relatively flat. Exploration in
the past by previous explorers has included drilling and surface sampling programs. There are no
outstanding rehabilitation sites within EL10120, which are covered by Rockland Resource’s MMP or
site registry.
Figure 4 shows the satellite imagery from 2012 (similar to current Google Earth) and the possible
location of one costean and 13 RC drill holes. The specific locations will vary within the target areas
depicted in the figure. The holes will likely be no deeper than 200 m. The proposed costean is to
assess the geology and for sampling purposes. It is estimated that the costean will be approximately
2 m deep (to bedrock) and up to 80 m in length. The costean will be constructed to minimise the
effect on the environment (i.e. careful handling of top soil and avoiding established trees). The
material will be piled next to the costean and put back into the costean once the geology has been
fully assessed. The ~ 1 kg samples will likely be on a .5 to 2 m basis. Water for drilling will be sourced
from nearby dams. No new track work is required since the area is flat with a network of existing
tracks. Nevertheless a contingency of 1 km track is included in this proposal.
The costean and drilling will be undertaken in accordance with the policies outlined in this MMP and
respective department technical advisory notes AA7-006 and AA7-029 (see APPENDIX K).
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
Page | 20
Table 11 Summary of proposed ground disturbing exploration activities by Rockland Resources at
Yam Ck.
Mining Interests (i.e. titles) EL10120
What time of year will exploration occur June, 2017
Type of holes drilled (i.e. RAB, RC, DDH, Aircore) RC
Target Commodity Gold and Base
Metals
Is the drilling likely to encounter radioactive material No
Number of holes drilled 13
Maximum depth of holes (m) 200
Number of drill pads cleared ( 5 x 5 m) 13
Number of sumps cleared 13
Is drilling likely to encounter groundwater Unsure
Drilling Disturbance (ha) 0.16
Tracks Length cleared (m) 1 km
Tracks Disturbance (ha) .5ha
Area of costeans excavated (five 80 m length, 1 m width, 2 m deep) (ha) 0.016
Area Total bulk sample pits (ha) Nil
Will topsoil be removed for rehabilitation purposes Yes if present
Previous disturbance yet to be rehabilitated on the title (ha) if known Nil
Camp Nil
Total area disturbed (ha) 0.176
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
Page | 21
Figure 4 Yam Ck Area 13 Possible Holes and 1 Possible Costean (yellow) overlying 2012 Imagery
(Actual locations may vary within general target areas shown in red)
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
Page | 22
5. CURRENT PROJECT SITE CONDITIONS
The Hayes Creek project falls within the Daly Basin and Pine Creek bioregions. The project area
consists of typical Top End rugged hill country, with steep sided rocky, scree covered hills ranging
from 180-280m ASL. Soils on the hills are mostly skeletal and consist mainly of rocky scree.
The area has a savannah climate with a short wet season and prolonged dry season.
Vegetation is sparse and stunted on the rocky hills and is dominated by Eucalypts and
Ironwood (E. Latifolia, E.alba, E.miniata and Erythropleum chlorostachys) with an understory which
predominantly consists of Plachonia careya, Grevilia goodie, Brachychita paradoxum, Buchania
obovata Cochlospernum sp, Calytrix sp and Livistona humilis as well as native grasses.
The NT NRM Infonet http://lrm.nt.gov.au/infonet provides map-based information to help people
manage their land for biodiversity, weeds and pest animals. The site provides an overview of the
biodiversity values and threats for any area within the Northern Territory. Results of the Infonet
search for Hayes Creek is shown in Appendix D.
5.1 Geology
The general topography around the Project Area consists of undulating terrain with scattered hills,
isolated strike ridges and alluvial flats. On the project area slopes and summits consist of erosional
remnants of siltstone, sandstone and quartz on slightly weathered meta-sediments of the Burrell
Creek geological formation. Colluvial wash slopes have a veneer of siltstone flakes and/or sub-
angular stony quartz in a loamy mix. Soils are either gravelly or skeletal on the slopes and summits
or silty, sand or clay soils on the flats.
Hayes Creek is located centrally within the Pine Creek Orogen. The Orogen contains Early
Proterozoic, dominantly clastic sediment and minor volcanics which were folded and
metamorphosed. The stratigraphy comprises the Early Proterozoic Gerowie Tuff and Mt. Bonnie
Formation of the South Alligator Group and the overlying Burrell Creek Formation of the Finniss
River Group. A major dolerite dyke, which is magnetic and fine grained, intrude the stratigraphy.
Several thin (generally < 1.0m thick) lamprophyre dykes also intrude the stratigraphy.
Rocks of the South Alligator and Finniss River Groups outcrop poorly. The dominant outcropping
rock types are siltstone, mudstone, greywacke and chert. These rocks outcrop on low rises often
with pisolitic scree. Surrounding the rises are tertiary sands, gravels and silts as well as younger
alluvium associated with the Margaret River.
Soils are predominantly loamy lithosols less than one meter deep, derived from metamorphosed
slates and shales with some earthy sands and red / yellow earths. Soils are skeletal and generally
acidic. 5.2 Hydrogeology
Creeks within the project area are typically incised dendritic streams in the hill country that flow
during the wet season between December to April and dry out during the dry season. The streams
debauch on to alluvial plains where the typically adopt a meandering course.
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
Page | 23
Drainage flows occur in to the Yam Creek or the Hayes Creek systems, which are tributaries of the
Margaret River.
Some parts of the project area have been subject to historical alluvial gold mining, which has
disrupted the natural drainage pattern, leaving a series of interconnected dams and spoil-banks. 5.3 Flora
The Hayes Creek Project is located within the Daly Basin and Pine Creek bioregions and no sites of
conservation significance are identified within the project area.
On the project area the undulating plateaux and plains are open forests with mixed stands of Darwin
woolly butt (Eucalyptus miniata) and stringybark (E. tetrodonta), with a shrub layer and ground
layer dominated by sorghum species. Other species include fan palm (Livistonia humilis) and zamia
palm (Cycas armstrongii). Other associations on the undulating country include northern box (E.
tectifica), round-leaved bloodwood (E. latifolia) and ironwood (Erythrophleum chlorostachys)
with fan palms and tall grasses such as sorghum and giant spear grass (Heteropogon triticeus).
On the rocky ridges and outcrops woodlands include stringybark, Darwin woolly butt and variable-
barked bloodwood (C. dichromophloia) over curley spinifex (Plectrachne pungens) and golden
beard grass (Chrysopogon fallax).
Along watercourses, billabongs and in poorly drained soils are communities of paperbark
(Melaleuca viridiflora), screw palm (Pandanus spiralis), river pandanus (P. aquaticus) and
freshwater mangrove (Barringtonia acutangula) (Kerle, 1996). 5.4 Fauna
Fauna in the project area is similar to the northern Top End, with mainly woodland species inhabiting
the tenements. Common fauna species that have been sighted in the area include the Agile Wallaby
(Macropus agilis) and Goanna (Varanus panoptes).
There is a high diversity of birds including migratory and water birds. Monsoon specialists include
the rainbow pitta (Pitta iris), rose-crowned fruit dove (Ptilinopus regina) and torresian imperial
pigeon (Ducula bicolar). Amongst the billabong fringing vegetation are found honeyeaters,
flycatchers and finches. The endangered gouldian finch (Erythrura gouldiae) is known from several
locations in this bioregion. The pig nosed turtle (Carettochelys insculpta) also occurs in the region
(Kerle, 1996). 5.5 Pest Species
The NT Government publication “Northern Territory Weed Management Handbook” (2015) provides
an excellent resource to help be aware of new weeds in the area.
https://nt.gov.au/environment/weeds .
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
Pest species for the area include the Bellyache Bush (atropha gossypifoli), Chinee apple (Ziziyphus mauritiana),
Creeping lantana (Lantana montevidensis), Grader grass (Themeda quadrivalvi), Hymenachne (Hymenachne
amplexicaulis,) Hyptis (Hyptis suaveolens), Lantana (Lantana camara), Mimosa (Mimosa pigra), Mission grass
(Pennisetum polystachion), Sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia) and (S. tora) and Snake weed (Stachylarpheta spp).
To date the weed species sighted in the general area of the project are Mission grass (Pennisetum
polystachion) and Hyptis (Hyptis suaveolens).
Fauna pest species in the region include the Feral pig (Sus scrofa), Wild dog (Canis spp.), Feral cat (Felis catus),
Cane toad (Buffo marinus), Water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) and the Donkey (Equus asinus).
To date the animal pest species sighted on the project area were the Feral pig (Sus scrofa), Cane toad (Buffo
marinus), Water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) and the Donkey (Equus asinus). 5.6 Land Use
The underlying pastoral tenure for the project area is Douglas Station pastoral lease that is owned by NT
Vet Supplies Pty Ltd (PL903 – NT Portion 2683). Copies of the ILIS Landholder reports for PL903 is
attached at Appendix E.
A land access agreement was attempted to be established with Douglas Station in mid-2017, however,
there were numerous delays in establishing dialogue and then agreeing on the content including the
compensation aspects. Douglas Station has nominated Emanate Legal to handle all legal aspects and also
any ongoing correspondence. The agreement is included in Appendix E – but will not be included on the
internet due to commercial confidence.
Contact: Nicholas Taylor
Emanate Legal
Ph: 07-47270100 / 0438725047
The Brocks Core Storage area is not within a Pastoral Lease since it is part of the Brocks infrastructure
accessed by road.
The Hayes Ck region is nominally grazing country, however, only the Lady Josephine area supports open range
grazing; most other areas are too rugged for cattle. None of the proposed disturbance areas is used for
intensive pastoral or any other purposes. The lady Josephine area is the northern extension of Yam Creek.
Yam Creek has been mined historically for alluvial gold deposits and some parts are extensively disturbed.
The land area adjacent to the Thunderball Prospect is covered by the leases of the Sandy Creek Alluvial Gold
Mine. Sporadic, small scale gold alluvial gold mining and prospecting takes place here. It also appears to be
the principal residence of a local prospector, Mr Derek Dixon.
The surrounding area is part of the NT Goldfields, a region that has been subject to extensive mining activity
since the 1870's. Crocodile Gold / Newmarket Gold’s active Cosmo / Brocks Project Areas are in production
nearby.
The Historic Grove Hill Hotel is located within the project and Hayes Creek Roadhouse is situated just to the
south east.
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
Page | 25
5.7 Historical, Aboriginal, Heritage Sites
Searches of the project area conducted by the Aboriginal Areas Protection Authority (AAPA) found that a
number of sacred sites are located within the project area. Copies of the AAPA search reports for the project
are attached at Appendix F.
Copies of the Heritage site search reports from the Department of Lands, Planning and the Environment are
attached at Appendix G.
Copy of the Historic sites (Declared Historical Places) search report from the Department of Lands, Planning
and the Environment is attached at Appendix H.
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
Page | 26
Key areas are:
Brocks Creek Township, Railway Siding & Military Detention Barracks
http://www.ntlis.nt.gov.au/heritageregister/f?p=103:302:1242687268697343::NO::P302_SI
TE_ID:18
Brocks Creek Chinatown and Temple Site
http://www.ntlis.nt.gov.au/heritageregister/f?p=103:302:1242687268697343::NO::P302_SI
TE_ID:23
Brocks Creek Cemetery
http://www.ntlis.nt.gov.au/heritageregister/f?p=103:302:1242687268697343::NO::P302_SI
TE_ID:295
Grove Hill Hotel
http://www.ntlis.nt.gov.au/heritageregister/f?p=103:302:1242687268697343::NO::P302_SI
TE_ID:102
The proposed disturbance activities in this MMP have been cross-referenced with Historical,
Aboriginal and Heritage sites to ensure there is no possible conflict or infringement. All personnel
have also been made aware of these sites.
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
Page | 27
6. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM/PLAN
Excellence in environmental management is fundamental to Rockland Resources; it is a foundation
to Rockland’s vision for the future. The company recognises that our performance is judged by the
actions of our employees and contractors, which in turn promotes environmentally responsible
behavior by the company and those employed by Rockland. In exploring the project area, our goals
are to prevent, minimise, mitigate, and remediate any harmful effects of our operations on the
environment. To achieve these goals Rockland will:
Comply with all requirements of the Northern Territory Mineral Titles Act and the Mining
Management Act;
Integrate environmental issues into planning and decision making processes;
Develop and implement an Environmental Management Plan for the project;
Identify the risks that operations on the project area may pose to the environment to
manage and minimise the risk to the environment;
Strive to achieve continuous improvement in environmental performance and management
practices;
Ensure that its employees, contractors and visitors to the project are aware of their
environmental responsibilities by participating in a site induction that will be recorded to
formalise the process;
Provide training and resources to allow personnel to conduct activities in a safe manner;
Maintain a system of formal incident reporting to prevent reoccurrence;
Undertake regular reviews of environmental performance; and
Establish an open dialogue with government and stakeholders in respect to operational
matters.
A Radiation Management Plan for the Hayes Creek Project is attached at Appendix I. The following
management measures for all personnel (including contractors) will be strictly enforced:
The wearing of a portable radiation monitor at all times while on the site;
The provision of general training in radiation safety;
Provision of a safety induction identifying the hazards of drilling and the steps to be taken to
minimise exposure to dust. Measures can include working up-wind from dust, washing parts
of the body that have been exposed to dust;
Waiting for dust to clear before sampling of drilling specimens; and
Wearing a dust mask in dusty situations while drilling is in progress;
If high-grade mineralisation is intersected, it will be labelled and stored separately.
On completion of the program, all highly radioactive material spoils will be returned down hole.
Holes may be capped with a temporary cap or permanently capped in accordance with DME
Guideline AA7-029 Construction and Rehabilitation of Exploration Drill Sites, a copy of which is
attached at Appendix J
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
Page | 28
6.1 Environmental Policy and Responsibility
Rockland Resources Pty Ltd is committed to sustainable development and acknowledges that sound
environmental management strategies are essential to the continual expansion of the Company.
Management is committed to excellence in environmental management and aims to prevent
unnecessary environmental impact from the Company’s operations through a policy of minimisation
of disturbance and degradation of ecosystems. Prompt and effective rehabilitation of any areas
disturbed during the course of exploration activities is a key strategy to mitigate environmental
harm.
To obtain this objective, Rockland Resources will:
Implement exploration programs to conserve resources, reduce waste and promote
recycling.
Observe all environmental laws and conduct activities in compliance with applicable
legislation, regulations and license requirements.
Actively promote environmental awareness among Company personnel and contractors to
increase the understanding of environmental matters.
Incorporate environmental matters into planning and operational decisions and conduct
regular audits of operations including those of contractors to ensure performance standards
are maintained at the highest level.
Undertake environmental awareness training programs for management and staff and
contractors to recognise the value of the environments in which they work.
Apply the Australian Minerals Industry Code for Environmental Management to all the
Company’s environmental management systems.
The Responsible Persons for the project are Thomas Northcott, Managing Director and is Geoff
Beckitt, Exploration Manager; who is responsible for maintaining the MMP and ensuring compliance
of activities.
Reporting of any Environmental Incidences will be in accordance with the Environmental Incident
Reporting Guidelines - Section 29 of the Mining Management Act; as shown at Appendix J.
Clearing and Rehabilitation of grid lines and tracks will be in accordance with the advisory note
shown in Appendix K. 6.2 Statutory Requirements
The following Acts may or will apply to the project:
Bushfires Act;
Dangerous Goods Act;
Energy Pipelines Act;
Environmental Assessment Act;
Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act;
Heritage Conservation Act;
Minerals Titles Act;
Mining Management Act;
Native Title Act;
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
Page | 29
Northern Territory Aboriginal Sacred Sites Act;
Northern Territory Land Corporation Act;
Northern Territory Rail Safety Act;
Pastoral Land Act;
Public Health Act;
Soil Conservation and Land Utilisation Act Territory Parks and Wildlife Conservation Act;
Traffic Act;
Waste Management and Pollution Control Act Water Act;
Weeds Management Act; and
Work Health and Safety (National Uniform Legislation) Act.
The following uranium specific legislation also applies to the project:
Atomic Energy Act;
Radioactive Ores and Concentrates (Packaging and Transport) Act; and
Code of Practice for Safe Transport of Radioactive Materials 6.3 Non-Statutory Requirements
Rockland Resources has a JV agreement with Crocodile Gold / Newmarket Gold applicable to titles as
shown in
Table 1. 6.4 Identified Stakeholder and Consultation
Rockland Resources will consult with relevant stakeholders prior to commencing any ground
disturbing activity.
Department of Mines and Energy;
Department of Business (NT WorkSafe);
Department of Land Resource Management;
Aboriginal Areas Protection Authority (AAPA);
Northern Land Council;
Ban Ban Springs (PL 1111);
Douglas Station (PL903);
Derick Dixon Mining Lease (MLN2028) adjacent to Thunderball; and
Crocodile Gold Australia Pty Ltd / New Market Gold; and
6.5 Induction and Training
Personnel, contractor and visitors will be required to participate in a Rockland site specific induction
shown in Appendix L that will be formally recorded; records of participation in the process will be
initially stored on site, then at Rocklands office in Brisbane.
In addition to the Rocklands induction, field personnel will also be required to participate in an
induction conducted by Crocodile Gold / Newmarket Gold that will also be formally recorded.
Key components of the induction process are:
Identification of duties of care;
Site environmental procedures;
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
Page | 30
Fitness for work;
Correct use of Personal Protective Equipment;
Hazard identification;
Risk assessment;
Emergency procedures.
The responsible persons will ensure that the policies and programs are developed and implemented,
and that exploration activities are conducted in a manner that poses the least amount of danger to
personnel and the environment. The provision of further training for personnel (if required) will be
undertaken by the responsible persons.
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
Page | 31
6.6 Identification of Environmental Impacts and Aspects
The table below provides a summary of environmental aspects and impacts related to exploration activities which are expanded in the remaining
section.
Table 12 List of environmental aspects and impacts related to exploration activities
Aspect Impact Risk Rating Management measures (prevention) Management measures (remediation)
Clearing for drill pads/
tracks / camps / costeans
Loss of native flora and
fauna Medium
Leave the area of the drip line of a tree’s
canopy untouched to protect the tree’s
root ball.
Disturbance to flora and fauna will be
minimal due to sensitive clearing of drill
pads. Maintain the smallest possible area
for drill pads using blade–up technique.
Re-establish / clear tracks using blade–up
technique. Establish camps in cleared
areas.
Close/ cap drill holes as soon as possible
after exploration activities have ceased.
Re-spread topsoil over pads and seed;
monitoring will determine if it is required.
Remove all rubbish from camp areas for
disposal at approved facility.
Radioactive
materials
(NORM)
Radioactive
contamination
of soil and surface waters
Low
Constant monitoring of drill
spoils and groundwater for radioactivity.
Use of dust suppression unit on drill rig.
Use of sumps to manage groundwater
expelled by drilling
Burial of all radioactive
materials under at least 1 metre of soil
Driving between drill sites
/ tenements
Spread of weed pest
species Medium
Inspect vehicles prior to entry and exit
from project area.
Establish shake down areas near the exit
from the project area to assist in removing
weeds and seeds from plant and
equipment.
Incidences of new weed species on site
will be reported to DLRM and DME.
Consider establishing a spraying campaign
to control weed infestation or hand pull
weeds from small areas where infestation
has taken hold.
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
Page | 32
Aspect Impact Risk Rating Management measures (prevention) Management measures (remediation)
Personnel are familiar with the NT
Government, 2015, Northern Territory
Weed Management Handbook:
https://nt.gov.au/environment/weeds
Drilling
Medium
Noise and dust emissions will be managed
with mandatory noise and dust reduction
equipment on plant and machinery.
PPE will be issued to personnel to
minimize exposure to dust and noise.
Sumps to be lined with a heavy
polyurethane membrane.
Topsoil will be re-spread as soon as
possible after cessation of drilling.
Hydrology
Water encountered
during drilling/ surface
water
Medium Provision will be made to divert water into
drill sumps or on to the surrounding land.
Water to be diverted onto surrounding
land will first be diverted into a silt trap.
The water that will leave the trap will have
deposited its silt load into the trap before
leaving.
Sacred Site Intrusion Possible destruction of
sacred site High
The operator has received an abstract
from the register of sacred sites
confirming that there are registered sites
within the project area.
If the intention is to drill in the vicinity
identified sites, the operator may request
a Clearance Certificate from AAPA to
identify the areas in which the sites occur,
and to determine if any other
unregistered sites are present on the
project area.
Knowledge of the precise location of
sacred sites on the project area will enable
the proponent to remove any risk of
intruding on registered or unregistered
sites.
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
Page | 33
Aspect Impact Risk Rating Management measures (prevention) Management measures (remediation)
Fuel Storage
Hydrocarbon spills –
contamination of soil,
surface and ground water
Dust and noise emission –
pollution and disturbance
to fauna
Medium
Diesel fuel will be brought on site in 200
litre drums, stored on the service truck
and transferred via a hand-pump. Spill kit
will be on hand at transfer point. Only
sufficient fuel for the day’s activities will
be brought on to the work site.
Small quantities of fuel (in sealed 200 litre
drums) will be carried on the service truck.
Spill kit will be on hand at transfer point
Flora and Fauna
- Trapping of fauna in pits
and costeans
- Introduction of weeds
Low
All sumps will be constructed with an
egress ramp at one end to aid fauna
escape from sumps. Sumps will not be left
open for longer than essential. Vehicles
will be washed down prior to entry and
exit of work area
Rescue of animals if safe to do so.
Disturbed sites to be audited and weed
eradicated
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
34
6.6.1 Water Management
Diamond and RC drilling will require only limited water. This will be drawn from dams at Sandy Creek Mine
or from authorised water supplies at the driller’s base of operations for the campaign. Past experience has shown that RC holes in the Thunderball Prospect area can be drilled dry. Sumps will be
dug to contain potential water flows as needed. Ground water in the area is of good quality, and minor spills
of water are unlikely to have an adverse environmental impact. No specific measures to protect local aquifers are undertaken; the targeted uranium mineralisation mostly lies
well below the water table, which is considered to be the main aquifer in the region. Exploration activities
are not expected to have a discernible impact on groundwater water quality. Upon final closure all holes
that intersect significant mineralisation will be grouted. No groundwater extraction is currently taking place in this area, and Rockland is not aware of any proposals
for future groundwater extraction in the area affected by the exploration activities. There are no water bores in the area of exploration activities, and no permanent streams, thus Rockland
does not propose to do any water quality monitoring at this stage of the exploration program.
Sumps with a minimum capacity of 4m3 and minimum depth of 1.5m will be excavated for each hole in
order to capture groundwater expelled from the hole during the drilling process. The groundwater is not
hyper-saline and poses little risk to the environment. Should groundwater be intersected in areas of uranium mineralisation then any outflow will be monitored by on- site spectrometer / scintillometer. If warranted, samples will be submitted for analysis.
6.6.2 Invasive Species Management
The spread of weeds is minimised by regular inspection and wash down of vehicles. Upon final
rehabilitation the pads and access track will be checked for the more easily identifiable declared weeds (the
personnel doing the checking will have no formal botanical training, and the company considers it
unwarranted at this stage of the exploration program to employ a botanist), and if any are detected
remedial action will be taken. A number of weed species have been observed on nearby disturbed areas of
Sandy Creek Mine. Vehicles are regularly washed both at the exploration site and at Adelaide River prior to commencing fieldwork.
6.6.3 Flora and Fauna Management
Weed control will be “prevention first” approach as per the NT weeds management strategy. Introduction of weeds will be prevented by the prior and regular washing of all machinery located from other
areas. Vulnerable and endangered fauna will be identified in the induction process and during the work
program. Ground disturbance activities will be kept to a minimum, thus limiting interaction with these
species or their habitats. Should areas of importance be identified the senior site geologist will ensure areas
are not disturbed.
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
Page | 35
The impact of exploration activities on the flora and fauna is planned to be
reduced by:
Limiting ground disturbing clearance to a minimum,
Instruction given by the senior site geologist to preserve large or old trees during clearance
that may provide nesting habitat for birds such as the Red-tailed Black Cockatoo,
Carry out exploration activities during daylight.
6.6.4 Waste Management
All waste is removed from site and disposed of in approved government waste disposal facilities
in Pine Creek, Adelaide River or Berry Springs.
6.6.5 Cultural and Heritage Management
Rockland Resources has the results of a search of the register of Sacred Places administered by
Aboriginal Areas Protection Authority (AAPA) as per Section 4.7. The company will continue to be
aware of and avoid all registered sacred sites.
6.6.6 Hazardous Material and Hydrocarbon Management
It is a legislative requirement that materials safety data sheet (MSDS) information is available on
hazardous substances that are used in any workplace in within the Company. This register (located
in the Pine Creek Office) is kept up to date with new substances being added to the register and
substances no longer on site or used in the work sites being removed from the register. No hazardous materials are used on site at the Hayes
Creek Project. Radioactive substances (drill chips and core) are kept in a secured, fenced facility at the Company’s
Adelaide River storage yard. Radioactive material from the Hayes Creek Project is also kept at this
facility. Hydrocarbons (petrol, diesel, and drilling fluids) which may be transported to and from site
are only to be transported in approved containers. When transporting hazardous materials a spill
response kit (including first aid kit, fire extinguisher, containers for disposal of spilled material and
sorbent material) is required on the transporting vehicle. Due to the proximity of the Hayes Creek Project to town sites such as Hayes Creek and Adelaide
River, no hydrocarbons are to be stored on site, as vehicles will be refuelled in authorised fuel
outlets off-site The only exception to this is the RC drilling rig which may be refuelled on site from the drill
support vehicle. Rockland Resources requires the drilling contractors to have a hydrocarbon spill kit
on site during the refuelling process.
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
Page | 36
Ground affected by minor hydrocarbon spills (i.e. from leaking hoses) is to be shovelled into a
green plastic bag, removed from site and disposed of at an approved waste facility. 6.7 Emergency Procedures and Incident Reporting
Environmental incidents that could conceivably happen could be: hydrocarbon spills, radioactive
contamination, fires and uncontrolled clearing.
In the case of hydrocarbon spills emergency procedures are to clean up the spill as quickly as
possible using soaker mats, to remove any contaminated soil, and as an interim response to create
bunds or barriers to contain the spill so that it cannot spread or enter waterways. Any spill of
greater than 10 litres will be considered a reportable incident.
Radioactive contamination could occur if high grade mineralisation is intersected in the drilling and
for some unforseen reason the sample collection system malfunctions. However, the quantity of
material would be extremely small and would be relatively easily to clean up manually.
In the unlikely case of fires started by Rockland Resource’s activities the response will be to
attempt to put out the fire with fire extinguishers and the fire-fighting unit kept on standby if this
can be done without personal risk. If this cannot be done, personnel will be evacuated. It is more
likely that bushfires not related to Rockland Resource’s activities will occur. In this event the
response is to take only the action necessary to guarantee the safety of personnel and equipment.
Uncontrolled clearing should not occur as earthmoving activities will be tightly managed. In case
through some unforeseen circumstance it does occur, this will be a reportable incident. No
emergency procedures are likely to be of use in this eventuality.
If Rockland Resource’s activities are observed to be causing significant erosion, then the emergency
procedure is to attempt to stabilise the area affected through the creation of diversion drains,
bunds or any other appropriate technique.
The company has incident reporting procedures which, while mainly focussed on OHS, also require
the reporting of any environmental incidents. Environmental incidents will also be reported to DME
in accordance with Section 29 of the Mining Management Act.
As part of the induction and training process all employees and contractors are made aware of the
need to report an incident or near miss. All incidents are reported to the OH&S co-ordinator and the
Exploration Manager as soon as practicable. An incident report is completed and the incident
investigated and rectified.
These reports are reviewed at toolbox, safety and exploration meeting to provide a means of
feedback for both the employees and employer. These reports will be annually reviewed in the
view of the company continually improving.
In the unlikely event of a serious incident (i.e. spill) occurs, then a notification of a serious accident
or critical incident (environmental) form must be completed and submitted to the DME in
accordance with Section 29 of the Mining Management Act.
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
Page | 37
If a serious environmental accident occurs the operator must carry out an investigation to determine
its cause and forward a written report to the Department of Mines and Energy (Section 31 of the
Mining Management Act). 6.8 Environmental Audits and Inspections
All disturbances caused by Rockland activities will be entered in a log as they occur. As these
disturbed areas are rehabilitated, details will be entered in these logs, thus allowing continuous
monitoring of the status of rehabilitation during the season. Ultimately, all environmental activities
will be captured in an ongoing Disturbance Registry.
Upon completion of rehabilitation of operational areas that have been closed, the results will be
documented in an inspection report accompanied by photographs showing pre-rehabilitation and
post-rehabilitation, as well as a report of the rehabilitation activities conducted. It is understood that
the prerequisite for the return of an amount lodged as security is a rehabilitation report
accompanied by photographs.
Rehabilitated areas are intended to be inspected prior to the next field season or as soon as access
becomes available following the cessation of the wet season.
Radiation monitoring sites have been established near the Thunderball Deposit. Radiation level
measurements will be taken before and after any drilling activities at the deposit. The site locations
are shown in Table 13.
Table 13 Thunderball Area Radiation Monitoring Sites
Testing_Point GDA_E GDA_N
TP1 772789 8501445
TP2 772779 8501415
TP3 772751 8501424
TP4 772761 8501454
TP5 772790 8501584
TP6 772690 8501642
TP7 772644 8501582
TP8 772608 8501453
TP9 772565 8501382
TP10 772551 8501371
TP11 772690 8501346
TP12 772790 8501371
TP13 772549 8502050
TP14 772597 8501806
TP15 772630 8501300
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
Page | 38
6.9 Environmental Performance Reporting
Radiation levels will be monitored during drilling activities using a hand held scintillometer. Previous
explorers have conducted detailed ground radiometric surveys over the areas to be drilled and this
will be used as a baseline to determine a change in radioactivity levels following drilling.
Within the field season, of photographic and radiometric (where appropriate) data will be
undertaken for all Rockland drillholes for comparison with known datasets.
As data is collected during activities on the site, performance reviews will be carried out by the
Responsible Person.
Documentation kept on site will include:
1) Register of disturbed sites (location of drill-hole collars, costeans, pits and tracks) which will
include rehabilitation status. This will form part of the company’s database. The Responsible
Person will review the rehabilitation status of all disturbed sites prior to the start of the wet
season.
2) Radiometric surveys of sites prior to and post disturbance. These are kept in the company
database.
3) Identification sheets for endangered/vulnerable flora and fauna. These are included in the
company’s induction manual.
4) Photographic records of rehabilitation.
TP16 772723 8501233
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
Page | 39
7. EXPLORATION REHABILITATION
Table 14 Table of Rehabilitation Activities
Disturbance Rehabilitation Activities Schedule (Timing) Closure Objectives / Targets Monitoring Techniques
Drill holes
When core samples have been
analysed and there is no
requirement to go back down hole,
the holes will be permanently
plugged with plastic cones below
ground level, backfilled and
mounded as per Advisory Note AA7-
029.
If more down hole activity is
proposed temporary caps will be
installed
Holes will be permanently or
temporarily capped following
cessation of the drilling program.
All holes will be plugged/ capped as
per DME Advisory Note AA7-029.
Rehabilitated drill sites will be
inspected at end of the wet season
or within 6 months to ensure that
the site is safe and stable and that
there have not been any hole
failures.
Remediation of any failures will be
undertaken immediately.
Drill pads
Any topsoil that was removed will be
re-spread over the pad. Any shrubs
or trees that were removed will be
placed over the area to provide
habitat for small fauna.
The pad may not be rehabilitated
immediately after drilling ceases if
more down-hole is scheduled.
If no further work is proposed the
pad will be rehabilitated after drilling
ceases as per Advisory Note AA7-
029.
The drill pad will be rehabilitated
after drilling ceases as per Advisory
Note AA7-029.
Drill pads will be left in a safe and
stable condition as soon as possible
after the end of drilling program.
Rehabilitated drill pads will be
inspected at end of the wet season
or within 6 months to ensure that
the site is safe and stable and that
regrowth on the area is satisfactory.
Sumps
Sumps will not be filled until all
water has been pumped out or
evaporated.
Polyurethane liners will be removed
if applicable for disposal at an
If no further work is proposed the
sump will be rehabilitated after
drilling ceases as per Advisory Note
AA7-029.
The sump will be rehabilitated after
drilling ceases as per Advisory Note
AA7-029.
Sumps will be left in a safe stable
condition as soon as possible after
the end of drilling program.
Rehabilitated sumps will be
inspected at end of the wet season
or within 6 months to ensure that
the site is safe and stable and that
regrowth on the area is satisfactory.
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
Page | 40
Disturbance Rehabilitation Activities Schedule (Timing) Closure Objectives / Targets Monitoring Techniques
Drill holes
When core samples have been
analysed and there is no
requirement to go back down hole,
the holes will be permanently
plugged with plastic cones below
ground level, backfilled and
mounded as per Advisory Note AA7-
029.
If more down hole activity is
proposed temporary caps will be
installed
Holes will be permanently or
temporarily capped following
cessation of the drilling program.
All holes will be plugged/ capped as
per DME Advisory Note AA7-029.
Rehabilitated drill sites will be
inspected at end of the wet season
or within 6 months to ensure that
the site is safe and stable and that
there have not been any hole
failures.
Remediation of any failures will be
undertaken immediately.
Drill pads
Any topsoil that was removed will be
re-spread over the pad. Any shrubs
or trees that were removed will be
placed over the area to provide
habitat for small fauna.
The pad may not be rehabilitated
immediately after drilling ceases if
more down-hole is scheduled.
If no further work is proposed the
pad will be rehabilitated after drilling
ceases as per Advisory Note AA7-
029.
The drill pad will be rehabilitated
after drilling ceases as per Advisory
Note AA7-029.
Drill pads will be left in a safe and
stable condition as soon as possible
after the end of drilling program.
Rehabilitated drill pads will be
inspected at end of the wet season
or within 6 months to ensure that
the site is safe and stable and that
regrowth on the area is satisfactory.
approved facility.
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
Page | 41
Disturbance Rehabilitation Activities Schedule (Timing) Closure Objectives / Targets Monitoring Techniques
Costeans (Costeans)
The position will be chosen to have
minimal impact on the
environment including trees. Top
soil and surface material will be
stocked next to the costean.
Any topsoil that was removed will
be re-spread over the costean. Any
shrubs or trees that were removed
will be placed over the area to
provide habitat for small fauna.
If no further work is proposed
the costean will be rehabilitated
prior to the next wet season
and in accordance with
Advisory Note AA7-006.
The site will be rehabilitated
as per Advisory Note AA7-
006.
The site will be left in a safe
and stable condition as soon
as possible after the end of
the program and as close as
possible to the original state
including top-soil.
Rehabilitated costeans will be
inspected at end of the wet
season or within 6 months to
ensure that the site is safe and
stable and that regrowth on
the area is satisfactory.
Bulk sample pits
The position will be chosen to have
minimal impact on the
environment including trees. Top
soil and surface material will be
stocked next to the pit.
Any topsoil that was removed will
be re-spread over the pit. Any
shrubs or trees that were removed
will be placed over the area to
provide habitat for small fauna.
If no further work is proposed
the pit will be rehabilitated
prior to the next wet season
and in accordance with
Advisory Note AA7-006.
The site will be rehabilitated
as per Advisory Note AA7-
006.
The site will be left in a safe
and stable condition as soon
as possible after the end of
the program and as close as
possible to the original state
including top-soil.
Rehabilitated pits will be
inspected at end of the wet
season or within 6 months to
ensure that the site is safe and
stable and that regrowth on
the area is satisfactory.
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
Page | 42
Tracks / Gridlines
Existing tracks to be cleaned up if
required using blade-up technique.
If compaction occurs they will be
ripped prior to closure of the site as
per DME Advisory Note AA7-005
(attached at Appendix 9), unless
required to remain in place by the
pastoralist.
Tracks/ Gridlines will be
rehabilitated as per Advisory
Note AA7-005 upon closure of
the Authorisation unless
required to remain in place by
the pastoralist.
Tracks will be rehabilitated as
per Advisory Note AA7-005
unless required to remain in
place by the pastoralist
Rehabilitated tracks will be
inspected at end of the wet
season or within 6 months to
ensure that they remain safe
and stable and that regrowth
on the area is satisfactory
Sample bags
All radioactive samples to be buried
1m below ground, or stored in a
locked facility.
On completion of program No radioactive samples to be
left on pads at completion of
program
Inspection of holes to be
undertaken at the end of the
wet season. Remediation
immediately if necessary.
Radiation levels of pads
monitored and recorded
before and after drilling.
Camp
N/A for present season:
Mobile camps only – caravans and
tents to be established on open
areas, no clearing proposed.
Domestic rubbish will be removed
and disposed of at an approved
facility. Long drop toilet.
N/A for present season:
Only 2 camps are anticipated.
Camp sites to be vacated will be
cleaned-up before vacating the
area. Long drop toilets will be
filled in.
N/A for present season:
The camps will be located on
naturally occurring open
areas or previously cleared
areas. The sites will be left in
“as found” condition.
N/A for present season:
Camp sites will be inspected at
end of the wet season or
within 6 months to ensure that
they remain safe and stable
and that regrowth on the area
is satisfactory.
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
Page | 43
8. COSTING OF CLOSURE ACTIVITIES
8.1 Legacy Security
The historical rehabilitation includes some limited tracks at the Thunderball Deposit area and core
storage facility is presented in Appendix B, which totals $12,042.
8.2 New Security Appendix M shows the new proposed security calculation for a costean and 13 drill holes in the Yam Ck area. There is extensive historical disturbance in the area dating more than 100 year, and a network of tracks providing sufficient access for the proposed work. Nevertheless a contingency of 1 km long track has been included. A summary of the calculation is show in Table 15, totalling $6,755.
Table 15 Summary of Security Calculation from Appendix M
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
Page | 44
9. PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES
During the period of the work programme covered by this MMP, the following Environmental
Objectives are to be met.
Table 16 Table of Environmental Objectives
Item Measureable Outcome Time Frame Person Responsible
Removal of all waste
from work areas
No introduced materials
within work area
Commencement of
operations and ongoing
Thomas Northcott – Managing Director
Geoff Beckitt – Exploration Manager
Capping/plugging and
rehabilitation of
drillholes to DME
approved standard
All holes plugged and buried
except for holes required for
possible re-entry
Majority by end of 2014
field season, and ongoing
Thomas Northcott – Managing Director
Geoff Beckitt – Exploration Manager
Rehabilitation of all drill
access tracks and pads
to DME standards
All pads cleaned and mounds
of natural surface debris and
topsoil respread, except for
holes required for possible
re-entry
Ongoing as tracks are no
longer required
Thomas Northcott – Managing Director
Geoff Beckitt – Exploration Manager
No transport of
imported species of
flora and fauna to or
from work areas
No flora or fauna observed at
work sites or at base
Commencement of
operations and ongoing
Thomas Northcott – Managing Director
Geoff Beckitt – Exploration Manager
Completion of Statutory
Rehabilitation Reports
Reports submitted within
time limits and to
requirements
Ongoing Thomas Northcott – Managing Director
Geoff Beckitt – Exploration Manager
Compliance with OHS
and Environmental
guidelines with regards
to noise and dust
emissions
Sound levels and dust
emissions below allowable
limits
Commencement of
operations and ongoing
Thomas Northcott – Managing Director
Geoff Beckitt – Exploration Manager
Monitoring and
recording of
Environmental effects
of work programme for
incorporation in future
MMPs
Compilation and
maintenance of site specific
and project scale disturbance
register
Commencement of
operations and ongoing
Thomas Northcott – Managing Director
Geoff Beckitt – Exploration Manager
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
Page | 45
10. REFERENCES
Thundelarra, 2013. 2013 Mining Management Plan for Hayes Ck Project, Current Authorisation
Number 0437-04, Element 92 Pty Ltd (A wholly owned subsidiary of Thundelarra Ltd.).
Crocodile Gold, 2013, 2013 Mining Management Plan for South East Burnside Project Area,
Authorisation 0531-01, Care and Maintenance 2013-2017.
Kerle, J.A. 1996, Bioregions of the Northern Territory. Draft report Conservation Commission of
Northern Territory, Palmerston, Northern Territory.
NT Government, 2015, Northern Territory Weed Management Handbook: https://nt.gov.au/environment/weeds
NT Government, 2012, Mining Management Act
11. APPENDICIES
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
Page | A
8.3 Appendix A Operator Nomination
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
B
8.4 Appendix B Previous Security Calculations
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
C
8.5 Appendix C Registry of Disturbed Sites
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
D
8.6 Appendix D Natural Resource Management
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
E
8.7 Appendix E Landholder Details and Land Access Agreement
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
F
8.8 Appendix F AAPA Search Reports
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
G
8.9 Appendix G Heritage Site Search Reports
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
G
8.10 Appendix H Historic Site Search Report
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
G
8.11 Appendix I Radiation Management Plan
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
J
8.12 Appendix J S29 Reporting Guideline
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
K
8.13 Appendix K DME Advisory Notes
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
L
8.14 Appendix L Induction and Training
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
M
8.15 Appendix M Security Calculation
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
N
8.16 Appendix N Crocodile Gold Confirmation Letter Re Brocks Core Storage
Hayes Creek Project – MMP 0804-01-V1 March 2018 Amendment
P
8.17 Appendix O Security Calculation for Brocks Core Storage