A Historical Ecology of the Limpopo and Kruger National Pakrs & Lower Limpopo Valley
Harvesting mopane worm in Limpopo and underlying...
-
Upload
phungtuong -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Harvesting mopane worm in Limpopo and underlying...
Harvesting mopane worm in Limpopo and underlying Ecological Infrastructure
Ruan Veldtman*, Zwanda Nethavhani & Stefan Foord
Utilizing mopane worms
• Food Security• Natural harvesting• Benefits of Biodiversity• Ecologically based Adaptation• Minimum intervention techniques• Mapping of Ecological Infrastructure
Phylogenetic constraints on dynamics
Time
N
Time
N
DynamicsLarvalaggregation
Egg clumpingFlyingability
less eggs small batches few larvae
Latent
Eruptive
more eggs large batches many larvae
Variability across field sites
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
CS1 CS2 CS3 CS4Survey date
Num
ber
of p
upae
V1
V2
H
G
Ku
Ko
Gonometa postica cocoons surveyed during fieldwork (on 100 host plants)
Distribution of Colophosphermum mopane (blue icons) and sites with mopane worm outbreaks in 2016 and 2017 (yellow icons).
MSc project:Development of minimum intervention
techniques to reduce variability in Mopane worms supply for harvesting.
ByZwannda Nethavhani
Supervisor: Prof Stefan FoordUniversity of Venda
Co‐supervisor: Dr Ruan VeldtmanSANBI
Research objectives and aims of MSc
i. Develop techniques to reduce variability in mopane worm supply for harvesting in both space and time.
ii. Develop an understanding of mopane worm population dynamics and spatial structuring.
iii. Quantify the effectiveness of sleeves to reduce I–III instar mortality in the field.
iv. To determine the spatial structure of mopane worm.
v. To compare mortality rate of seeded local population to that of established populations
Watch this spaceSemi-domestication of mopane worm can increase the
amount of biomass available for harvestingThis means that more mopane veld can potentially be
used as mopane worm forage as a biodiversity compatible resource use
In the face of climate change population management can reduce variability in mopane worm supply and thus improve food security.
This case study has many cross cutters that can highlight the importance of mapping EI that supports food security and ensuring sustainable benefits from biodiversity
Key mopane worm related references
Akpalu, W., Muchapondwa, E., & Zikhali, P. (2009). Can the restrictive harvest period policy conserve mopane worms in southern Africa? A bioeconomic modelling approach. Environment and Development Economics, 14(05), 587-600.
Gardiner, A.J. (2003) Internal Final Report: Mopane Woodlands and the Mopane Worm: Enhancing Rural Livelihoods and Resource Sustainability, DFID Project No. R7822. The Domestication of Mopane Worms (Imbrasia belina). Veld Products Research & Development, Gaborone, Botswana.
Ghazoul, J. (2006). Mopane woodlands and the mopane worm: enhancing rural livelihoods and resource sustainability. Forest Research Programme Report, 7822.
Hope, R. A., Frost, P. G., Gardiner, A., & Ghazoul, J. (2009). Experimental analysis of adoption of domestic mopane worm farming technology in Zimbabwe. Development Southern Africa, 26(1), 29-46.
Madibela, O. R., Mokwena, K. K., Nsoso, S. J., & Thema, T. F. (2009). Chemical composition of Mopane worm sampled at three sites in Botswana and subjected to different processing. Tropical animal health and production, 41(6), 935-942.
Makhado, R.A., Potgieter, M.J., Wessels, D.C., Saidi, A.T., Masehela, K.K., 2012. Use of mopane woodland resources and associated woodland management challenges in rural areas of South Africa. Ethnobot. Res. Appl. 10, 369–379.