Harlem United The Blocks Project
description
Transcript of Harlem United The Blocks Project
Harlem UnitedThe Blocks Project
Presented by Sara Gillen
Prepared by Z. Naqvi, S. Gillen, E. Aponte, V. Mojica, P. McGovern
HIV in Harlem
District Diagnoses (per 100,000)
Prevalence (% of population)
Death (per 1,000 PLWHA)
NYC Total 47.6 1.3% 17.9Central Harlem
137.6 2.9% 25.8
East Harlem 91.6 2.8% 26.9
Data from the NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, 2008 Surveillance Report
East and Central Harlem report the 2nd and 3rd highest rates of HIV diagnoses and prevalence, and the death rate is 1.5 times the city rate
Opportunities for Intervention
People Living With HIV/AIDS* New Infections
Marks G et al. AIDS. 2006;20(10):1447-1450.
~54%of new
infections
~46% of new
infections
Accounting for:
Accounting for:
~25% unaware
of infection(n=250,000)
~75%aware of infection
(n=750,000)
*N=1,000,000.
42% of these people are not in care
The CBO Challenge
2006: Federal guidance on HIV screening in clinical settings changed – universal testing, regardless of HIV risk history– Universal access to testing in medical
settings does not reach all NYC residents• lack of health insurance or a primary care
doctor• stigma related to same sex behavior or drug
use keeps people from seeking care• Risk perception is low, patients may refuse
test
Testing Services
Blocks/Zone Based Testing Risk Based Testing
Identification of high prevalence zones, community saturation
with prevention messages and HIV facts, increased testing accessibility via alternative venue and mobile testing
Social Networks: MSM, high-risk African American women
Venue Based: IDU, MSM, high
risk women, immigrants
Risk is defined as sharing syringes, unprotected anal or vaginal sex with an HIV-positive person or a person of unknown HIV status in a high risk group, STI in the last 12 months, unprotected sex in the last 12 months with multiple partners
Changing the Paradigm: Risk-Targeting with a Zone/Geographic
Approach
1) Geo-code clients to identify hot-spots for outreach and testing;
2) Saturate the zone with relevant and targeted HIV prevention facts and messages to remove stigma of testing and HIV;
3) Provide accessible, on-the-spot HIV testing; and
4) Provide referrals to linkage to care
Blocks: Tools and Tactics
Identification of Zones: Hot Spot Maps
• Saturate the identified zone with messages and promotional materials: “HIV is a community disease”, emphasis on routine testing and access to care
• Use guerilla marketing techniques to prompt interest in our services and promote testing (i.e., “Let’s Do It” blitz)
• Community-wide and local HIV awareness & outreach events
• Door-by-door surveys and outreach
Message Saturation
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3Zone A Zone B
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
It's All About Access
In-House Mobile
Num
ber
of T
ests
Increasing Accessibility
Overall Increase in Testing: 84% from
2008 to 20091200 1550
2662
4642
8431
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Num
ber o
f Tes
tsFindings: Increase In Overall
Testing
Testing 2008Approach Tests Positives Sero-positivity
Zone-Based 3,351 90 2.7%Risk-Based 1,291 48 3.7%� Venue-based 1,186 38 3.2%
� Social Networks 105 10 9.5%Totals 4,642 138 3.0%
Testing 2009Approach Tests Positives Sero-positivity
Zone-Based (incl. collabs) 5,919 86 1.5%Risk-Based 2,512 70 2.7%� Venue-based 1,201 37 3.1%
� Social Networks 1,311 33 2.5%Totals 8,431 156 1.9%
Findings: Positive Cases
Increasing Linkage to Care57%63%
78%81%
0%10%20%
30%40%50%60%
70%80%90%
2006 2007 2008 2009
Perc
enta
ge
We have increased connection to primary care for HIV positive clients to 80%, far surpassing the NYCDOHMH connection to care rate for Harlem (57. 7%).
Findings: Linkage to Care
Modification of Beliefs: N=693
χ2 =402.216, df 6 p<0.001;χ2=536.97, df 12 p<0.001; χ2=375.72, df 12, p<0.001;
Dispelling Myths
0%20%40%60%80%
100%120%
Can Tell By Lookingat Someone That
They Have HIV
Only Gay Men, DrugUsers & Sex
Workers Get HIV
MosquitoesTransmit HIV
% A
gree Baseline
Post
Findings
HIV Testing Since Blocks : N=693
χ2= 62.79, df 12 p<0.001;
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
frequ
ency
Never At Least Once Twice
Statistically Significant Increase in # of People who Tested for HIV in the Last 2 Years
Baseline
Post
Findings
%
Self-Perceived HIV Risk Among HIV+ Clients: N= 138
Medium =20
High= 55
Low =29
Other= 34 Don't know
= 21
No answer= 13
Specifically older adults (>40 yr old) and women make up the majority in the “low,” “medium,” and “other” categories.
Findings: 2008 Risk Perception
In high prevalence communities:
• Universal testing is critical
• Testing programs outside the clinical setting have a vital role in reaching community residents
• Stigma can be reduced by promoting HIV testing as a community norm
Conclusion
Thanks to the Gilead Sciences, MAC AIDS Fund and New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene for funding that supports our Blocks and Linkage to Care activities.
For more information, please contact:Sara Gillen: [email protected]
Acknowledgements