Happie Haema
-
Upload
happie-aliu -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Happie Haema
-
7/28/2019 Happie Haema
1/21
FLUORESCENT IN SITU
HYBRIDIZATION (F.I.S.H.)
AS A PRE-NATALDIAGNOSTIC TOOL.
BY
ALIU U. HAPPINESS
DISCUSSANT: BIVAN MURNA
CO-ORDINATOR: A. J. WHYTE.
JANUARY, 2013.
-
7/28/2019 Happie Haema
2/21
OUTLINE.
INTRODUCTION
HISTORY.
IMPORTANCE OF FLOURESCENCE IN SITU
HYBRIDIZATION (F.I.S.H.)
THE USE OF F.I.S.H IN PRE-NATAL DIAGNOSIS.
LIMITATIONS OF F.I.S.H.
CONCLUSION.
RECOMMENDATION.
REFERENCES.
-
7/28/2019 Happie Haema
3/21
INTRODUCTION.
Fluorescence in situ hybridization
(F.I.S.H.), is the assay of choice for
localization of specific nucleic acid
sequences in native context.
Fish is a DNA mapping technique in which
a DNA probe labeled with a marker
molecule is hybridized to chromosomes ona slide and visualized using a fluorescence
microscope.
-
7/28/2019 Happie Haema
4/21
HISTORY.
In the 1960s, researchers Joseph Gall and
Mary Lou realized that molecular
hybridization could be used to identify the
position of DNA sequences in situ (i.e. in
their natural positions within a
chromosome).
In 1969, the two scientists published alandmark paper demonstrating that
radioactive copies of DNA sequence could
-
7/28/2019 Happie Haema
5/21
Historycontd.
be used to detect complementary DNA
sequences in the nucleus of a frog egg.
Soon after Gall & Lous work, fluorescent
labels quickly replaced radioactive labels
in hybridization probes because of their
greater safety, stability and ease of
detection.
Today, most in situ hybridization is done
using FISH procedures.
-
7/28/2019 Happie Haema
6/21
BASIC PRINCIPLES OF
F.I.S.H. The basic elements of F.I.S.H. are a DNA
probe and a target sequence.
Before hybridization, the DNA probes are
labeled with a fluorophore.
Combining the denatured probe and target
allows the annealing of complementary
DNA sequences.
-
7/28/2019 Happie Haema
7/21
THE HUMAN CHROMOSOME.
Normalfinding:
46,XY
Micro-deletionshould be
confirmed by
the FISH
analysis
-
7/28/2019 Happie Haema
8/21
IMPORTANCE OF F.I.S.H. IN
PRE-NATAL DIAGNOSIS. Pre-natal diagnosis involves testing for
disease conditions in a fetus before its
birth, with the aim of detecting birth
defects, chromosome abnormalities andgenetic diseases.
This may sound as a total waste of time,
however, women over the age of 35 andthose with high blood pressure, diabetes,
asthma, epilepsy as well as those with
-
7/28/2019 Happie Haema
9/21
Contd.
family histories or ethnic backgrounds prone
to genetic disorders, or whose partners
have these are likely to give birth to babies
with some birth defect.
Hence, the need for pre-natal diagnosis to
give the parents the chance to prepare
psychologically, socially, financially andmedically for a baby with a health problem/
disability, or for the likelihood of a stillbirth.
-
7/28/2019 Happie Haema
10/21
INDICATIONS FOR PRE-
NATAL TESTING. History of multiple miscarriage.
When parents have children with known
genetic disorders.
When prospective mother is more than 35
years of age.
When either parents have produced achild with chromosome abnormality.
When either parents is a mosaic or carrier
of a chromosome anomaly.
-
7/28/2019 Happie Haema
11/21
Case 1: DiGeorge syndrome
hypertelorism
micromandibulalow set dysplastic
ear
antimongoloid
slant of eyelids
-
7/28/2019 Happie Haema
12/21
Microdeletion confirmed (loss of
one red signal)
Red signal
TUPLE1 (HIRA)
locus
Green signal
ARSA locus
(control probe)
Deleted chromosome
red signal absent
normal
chromosome
red signal on
HIRA locus is
present
Microdeletion 22q11.2 is associated with
DiGeorge syndrome.
-
7/28/2019 Happie Haema
13/21
Case 2
Phenotypic features and inborn defects
are typical for Williams-Beuren syndrome
This syndrome is caused by micro-deletion
of the long arm of the chromosome 7 (sub-
band 7q11.23).
It presents with inborn cardiac defects as
well as mental retardation.
-
7/28/2019 Happie Haema
14/21
Case 2 (boy, 2 years)
irides
stellataehypertelorism
open mouth,
thick lip
abnormal teeth
elfin face
low set ears
-
7/28/2019 Happie Haema
15/21
OTHER APPLICATIONS OF
F.I.S.H. Gene mapping.
Chromosome identification.
Aneuploidy detection. Total chromosome analysis.
Unique sequence DNA detection.
Gene amplification analysis. Micro-deletion syndrome analysis.
-
7/28/2019 Happie Haema
16/21
PROS OF F.I.S.H.
Advantage: less labor-intensive method for
confirming the presence of a DNA
segment within an entire genome than
other conventional methods like Southernblotting.
F.I.S.H. assays have high levels of
reliability, reproducibility and accuracywhen compared with other pre-natal
diagnostic techniques.
-
7/28/2019 Happie Haema
17/21
LIMITATIONS OF F.I.S.H.
Fish does not look at the actual structure
of the chromosome analyzed, it only tells
how many copies of a particular
chromosome are present.
Probe availability must be cleared with the
laboratory before specimen is collected,
because probes often have limitedavailability.
-
7/28/2019 Happie Haema
18/21
CONCLUSION
FISH - a process which vividlypaints chromosomes or portions of
chromosomes with fluorescent
molecules. FISH results provide couples with a
means to make rational andinformed decisions concerning the
pregnancy in cases where
anomalies are detected.
-
7/28/2019 Happie Haema
19/21
RECOMMENDATION.
Pre-natal diagnosis can detectchromosome abnormalities
associated with unexplained mental
retardation and miscarriages.
Therefore, it is recommended that
Teaching hospitals and otherclassic health institutions should
request F.I.S.H. for pregnant
mothers at risk.
-
7/28/2019 Happie Haema
20/21
REFERENCES.
Dobzhansky T. (2012), Genetics and the
origin of species. Columbia University
Press, New York 20: 10-15.
Dolan S.M. (2011), Prenatal Genetic
Testing. Pediatr.Ann 38: 426-430.
Kottler M. (2009), Preconception and the
counting of the Human Chromosomes.
Bull Histo Med48: 465-502.
-
7/28/2019 Happie Haema
21/21
Contd
Macdonald F. (2008), Practice of Pre-nataldiagnosis in the UK. Clinc Risk6: 14:
218-221.
Painter T.S. (2012), A new method for the
study of chromosome re-arrangements
and the plotting of chromosome maps.
Science 78: 585-586.
Stefansdottir V. (2010), Acceptance of 1st
trimester screening for chromosomal
anomalies. Obstet Gynaecol89: 931-
938