Hamas Fatah Agreement

download Hamas Fatah Agreement

of 2

Transcript of Hamas Fatah Agreement

  • 8/3/2019 Hamas Fatah Agreement

    1/2

    What Would a Hamas-Fatah AgreementMean?

    by Elliott Abrams

    December 28, 2011

    There are repeated efforts to forge a unity agreement of some sort between Hamas and Fatah,leading to a new unity government for the Palestinian Authority. Such a coalition was

    briefly in force in 2007 after the Saudi-sponsored Mecca Agreement. It quickly broke downinto violence and led to the Hamas coup in Gaza. What would it mean today?

    One immediate effect of such an agreement would be a new PA cabinet in which SalamFayyad would no longer be prime minister. Fayyads presence has meant, first, transparencyand a struggle against corruption. His departure almost guarantees that the integrity of thePAs books and finances will decline. But Fayyad as prime minister not only oversees the

    books; he also oversees the security forces. What were once thirteen armed gangs reporting toYasser Arafat is an increasingly professional sector, keeping order in the West Bank andworking well with the Israeli army and police against terror. With Fayyad gone, it is

    predictable that the PA services, including the American-trained police, will tend to becomemore corrupt and more political, serving the interests of Fatah or of certain Fatah leaders.

    At a deeper level, a unity agreement would bring Hamas into the PLO and therebycompromise the PAs and PLOs commitment to fight terrorism and seek a Palestinian statewithout violence. Since the death of Arafat in 2004, the PA and PLO have abandonedterrorism and spoken out against it. But consider two recent statements [courtesy of Palestinian Media Watch] , made days apart in December. First, PA president and PLOchairman Mahmoud Abbas, talking about negotiations with Hamas:

    we established some foundations for an agreement. Among these foundations first, Hamasconcurs with us on the following points: the first point is that the calm and the ceasefire are[in place] not only in Gaza, but also in the West Bank thats one. Two the resistance must

    be non-violent -popular. There will be no military resistance, honestly. And we agreed on this.The third point [was] that the permanent solution is on the 67 borders. Hamas agreed to this,too. The fourth point that we would go to elections in May of next year.

    Second, the statement by the Hamas prime minister Ismail Haniyah on the 24th anniversaryof the founding of Hamas:

    We say today, explicitly, so it cannot be explained otherwise, that the armed resistance and

    the armed struggle are the path and the strategic choice for liberating the Palestinian land,from the [Mediterranean] sea to the [Jordan] river, and for the expulsion of the invaders andusurpers [Israel] from the blessed land of Palestine. The Hamas movement will lead Intifadaafter Intifada until we liberate Palestine all of Palestine, Allah willing. Allah Akbar and

    praise Allah. We say with transparency and in a clear manner, that Palestinian reconciliation and all sides must know this cannot come at the expense of [our] principles, at the expenseof the resistance. These principles are absolute and cannot be disputed: Palestine all of Palestine is from the sea to the river. We wont relinquish one inch of the land of Palestine.The involvement of Hamas at any stage with the interim objective of liberation of [only]

  • 8/3/2019 Hamas Fatah Agreement

    2/2

    Gaza, the West Bank, or Jerusalem, does not replace its strategic view concerning Palestineand the land of Palestine.

    So, the most one can say is that Hamas is willing to stop committing acts of terror for a whilewhen that seems tactically smart, but ultimately the goal is a violent destruction of the State of Israel. How could there possibly be a peace negotiation if half of the PA government is

    committed to the Haniyah view?

    In the past, it was sometimes possible to argue that Hamas participation in the PA did not giveit a role in the PLOand it is the PLO with which Israel is in principle negotiating. But nowHamas is on the verge of joining the PLO as well, and according to the United Nations andthe Arab League the PLO is the sole legitimate voice of the Palestinian people. So whathappens when that voice is calling for Israels destruction? And when Hamas joins the PLO,how can the United States possibly allow the PLO to maintain its representative office inWashington?

    Perhaps these negotiations between Hamas and Fatah will never bear fruit. Perhaps both sidesmerely wish to appear to favor unity while in fact neither wants it. Perhaps the elections

    planned for May will never take placea reasonable bet, considering that there have been noelections for six years. Perhaps a new cabinet will be formed in Ramallah and soon collapse,as happened last time. But peace negotiations cannot occur until we know the answeruntilwe know the identity and intentions of those who may be governing the West Bank and maysit across the table should talks resume. So Secretary of Defense Panetta s now famousdemand just get to the damn table looks especially foolish today, when people who wantPalestine all of Palestine -from the sea to the river and say they will lead Intifada after Intifada until we liberate Palestine all of Palestine may be part of both the PA governmentand of the PLO.