Half-yearly review 2016 - JKX Oil & Gas/media/Files/J/JKX-V2/download... · 2017-06-06 · This...
Transcript of Half-yearly review 2016 - JKX Oil & Gas/media/Files/J/JKX-V2/download... · 2017-06-06 · This...
Half-yearly review 2016 29 July 2016
2
Disclaimer
This presentation contains certain forward-looking statements that are subject to the usual riskfactors and uncertainties associated with the oil and gas exploration and production business.
Whilst JKX believes the expectations reflected herein to be reasonable in light of the informationavailable to them at this time, the actual outcome may be materially different owing to factors beyondthe Group’s control or within the Group’s control where, for example, the Group decides on a changeof plan or strategy.
The Group undertakes no obligation to revise any such forward-looking statements to reflect anychanges in the Group’s expectations or any change in circumstances, events or the Group’s plansand strategy. Accordingly no reliance may be placed on the figures contained in such forward lookingstatements
Agenda
3
Summary 2016
Financial review
Operations review
Outlook
Average production of 10,393 boepd (2015: 8,611 boepd)
Production gains achieved through well-27 in Russia coming on line in late 2015 and an enhancement program targeting the technical potential of existing well stock in Ukraine
Updated Field Development Plans under final review
Monetization process of our Russian and Hungarian assets ongoing
Bond repayment of $12.3m made in February 2016. Bond liabilities reduced by $2.6m through bond repurchase program
Significant efficiencies and costs savings implemented at London headquarters and throughout the group
Summary 2016Restoring shareholder value at JKX
4
Agenda
5
Summary 2016
Financial review
Operations review
Outlook
Financial summary Tight cost control in the face of under-pressure revenues
Revenue down 20% at $35.4m resulting mainly from lower realisations in both Ukraine and Russia denominated in the US Dollar: Ukraine: $5.77/Mcf (2015: $8.25/Mcf) Russia: $1.47/Mcf (2015: $1.68/Mcf)
Loss from operations of $2.8m has been impacted by the decline in oil and gas prices and the further deterioration of local currencies but is an improvement on the loss of $7.3m for the same period last year
Despite the lower revenues, cash from operations more than doubled to $7.8m due to lower costs
Exceptional charges of $3.1m mainly relate to the replacement of the Board in January 2016
Group capital spend for the first half-year remains low pending completion of our Field Development Plans
6
Key Financials
($m) H12015
H1 2016
Change%
Group revenue 44.4 35.4 (20.3)
Loss from operations before exceptional items (7.3) (2.8) 61.6
Exceptional items - (3.1) N/A
Loss from operations after exceptional items (7.3) (5.8) 20.5
Cash from operations 3.5 7.8 >100
Capital expenditure 4.2 2.2 (47.6)
Realised gas price ($ per Mcf) 4.46 2.96 (33.6)
Realised oil price($ per bbl) 49.87 39.92 (20.0)
Group revenueReduction in revenues due to lower commodity prices
7
Group revenue declined by 20.3% to $35.4m mainly due to lower commodity prices and the weakening of local currencies which offset production gains
Group gas realisations were 33.6% lower at $2.96/Mcf largely due mainly to the weakening of the Ukrainian Hryvnia (by 20.6%) and the Russian Rouble (by 22.1%)
Group oil realisations were 20.0% lower at $39.92/bbl in line with international oil prices
Group revenues ($m)
44.4
35.4(8.4) (1.1)
(1.6) 2.1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1H2015 Ukraine gas revenues Ukraine oil revenues Ukraine LPG and otherrevenues
Russia revenues 1H2016
Loss from operationsImpacted by lower revenues
8
Results affected by $9.0m decrease in revenues as discussed on slide 7 Administrative expenses have increased due to higher legal costs related to the international arbitration
claim and court-mandated settlement of fees for the legal action previously taken against certain shareholders
DD&A charge reduced largely as a result of lower asset carrying values resulting from impairments recognised in Ukraine
Production based taxes decreased by $12.2m mainly due to reduction in gas production tax rate in Ukraine from 55% to 29% with effect from 1 January 2016
(7.3)
(2.8)
(5.8)
(9.0)2.4
1.9
(3.0)
(3.1)
-18
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
Loss fromoperations
1H2015
Sales Operating costs DD&A Production basedtaxes
Administrativeexpenses and
forex
Loss fromoperations
1H2016 (beforeexceptional items)
Exceptional items- remunerationand severance
costs
Loss fromoperations
1H2016 (afterexceptional items)
12.2
Loss from operations ($m)
Group capital spend remained low at $2.2m following a full review of operations and in anticipation of a new Field Development Plan (FDP) based on global best practices
Investment in Ukraine to support maintenance capex
Investment in Russia significantly reduced to $0.6m
Capital expenditure Low capital investment
9
20152016
Capital expenditure by country ($m)
1.7
2.3
0.2
1.5
0.6
0.1
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
Ukraine Russia Rest of the World
Movement in cashFocus to maintain liquidity
Key factors: Cash generated from operations improved to $7.8m Bond repayment of $12.3m made in February 2016. Further $1.7m used to repurchase 11
convertible bonds in June 2016 Despite significant payments in January and February 2016, liquidity has been successfully
managed
10
Movement in cash ($m)
25.9
18.47.8
(1.4)(2.2)
(10.9)(1.7) 0.9
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
40.0
31 December 2015 Cash fromoperations
Interest paid Purchase ofproperty, plant and
equipment andintangible assets
Bond repayment Repurchase ofcorporate bonds
Interest receivedand other cash
movements
30 June 2016
Agenda
11
Summary 2016
Financial review
Operations review
Outlook
Operational summary Key developments
12
Ukraine Elizavetovskoye – Maintained stable production from 3 wells Ignatovskoye – 3 velocity strings installed and re-started water injection Molchanovskoye – Successful workover of IG132 enhanced production Novo-Nikolaevskoye complex – Progress made on field development plans.
Implementation of enhancement list ongoing
Russia Koshekhablskoye - Steady production from wells 15, 20 and 25 Wireline intervention in Well 20 has meant no follow-up acid jobs required in H1 Well 27 acidized regularly to increase average production
Hungary No production in H1 2016 Farmout process underway Field Development Planning underway
Reserves & production
Group Reserves of 93.8 MMboe Production averaged 10,393 boepd, up 21% from the same period in 2015. Gas production is
40% higher in Russia and stable in the Ukraine. Oil production is 15% up in Ukraine
Ignatovskoye Field Successfully installed velocity strings in M155,
M157 and M159 Re-started water injection in Ignatovskoye Tubing replacement in IG106Molchanovskoye Field IG132 recompleted to the Devonian Recompletion of M163 into Devonian as part of
waterflood projectNovo-Nikolaevskoye Complex Field Development Plans to develop contingent
resources using the most up to date drilling and stimulation techniques
UkraineNovo-Nik area: Production Optimisation
13
Novo-Nikolaevskoye Complex
Reserves An update of the reserves is expected for the year end
Elizavetovskoye Field E301 and E302 production following
expected decline Salt treatments helping to arrest the
decline of production from E303 Field development plan in progress
Reserves An update of the Elizavetovskoye
reserves is expected for the year end
Ukraine Elizavetovskoye area: Focus on Production Optimization
14
Elizavetovskoye and West Mashivske Licenses
Steady production from wells 15, 20, 25 Well-27 being acidised regularly to
increase average rate Well design and FDP for the Callovian
reservoir initiated Reserves update on-going
RussiaKoshekhablskoye field: stable production
15
Agenda
16
Summary 2016
Financial review
Operations review
Outlook
Commencing development drilling in Ukraine once the Field Development Plan is approved
Completing our inherited legal battles in Ukraine and re-establishing a positive working relationship with all stakeholders
Monetization of our Russian and Hungarian assets is underway Mitigation of the $27.6 million bond payment liability due in February 2017
Outlook for 2H 2016 and 2017Focus on Ukraine
17
18
Our markets
Appendices
Loss for the periodImpacted by improvement in operations
19
$2.7m decrease in fair value movement on derivative liability is associated with the convertible bond since its placement on 19 February 2013
Loss for the period ($m)
(13.8)
(7.0)
(10.1)
4.5
2.7
0.3(0.7)
(3.1)
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
Loss after tax1H2015
Movement in lossfrom operations in
1H2016
Fair value onderivative liability
Net finance chargesand other
Increase in taxation Loss after tax (beforeexceptional items)
1H2016
Exceptional items Loss after tax (afterexceptional items)
1H2016