8/7/2019 Guy Neighbors Kansas

1/2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF KANSAS

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

(FICTITIOUS PARTY)

plaintiff,

V .

)

)

)

)

))

)

)

)Trust # 983160-340348-080047

)Issue Date E8:Y3160:A48:S4:M3:D1

)Trust # 983158-310405-020026

)Issue Date E8:Y3158:A5:SI:M4:D3

1/1512011

Case Nos. 10-3202

10-3203

10-3204D.C. NOs. 2:07-cr-20124

2:08-cr-20105-CM-JPO-1

2:07 -cr-20073-CM-1

CARRIE M. NEIGHBORS

(Beneficiary)

Defendant 1

GUY M. NEIGHBORS

(Beneficiary)

Defendant 2

JUDICIAL NOTICE BY WAY OF AFFIDAVIT OF FORMAL COMPLAINT,

IT WOULD APPEAR MY ATIORNEY MR. PINCUS IS ENGAGED IN PROSECTORIAL MISCONDUCT, BY REFUSING TO

PRESENT THE TRUE FACTS ON THE RECORD, AND SUBPOENA THE GRAND JURY TRANSCRIPTS, AND WITNESS

STATEMENTS, BASED ON THE FACT IT APPEARS THE INDICTMENT IS FRAUD, AND IT IS NOT SIGNED BY THE U.S.

ATIORNEY, OR A GRAND JURY FOREPERSON, WHICH IS REQUIRED BY LAW TO MAKE THE DOCUMENT A TRUEBILL.

I

COMES NOW Guy M. Neighbors Defendant (2) on this (\ f . . . . day of Febuary 2011, acting sui juris is giving

JUDICIAL NOTICES and affirms that the foregoing affidavit is True, Correct, and Complete to the best of my

knowledge and belief and not misleading.

It would appear the appellate attorney for these cases is engaged in prosectorial misconduct, by refusing to

present the TRUE facts of the case to the court, and his failure to enter several affidavit signed under the penalty

of perjury on the record, he is adding and abetting fraud on the court, and is involved in the cover up of a possibleFraudulent Indictment that is missing Key signatures that would be required to make the document a "TRUE BILL."

Mr. Pincus is acting with Malice Intent to keep evidence OUT of the Record, and is only interested in discussing

the facts he wants to discuss, and NOT all of the facts of the case.

I'm being denied my 5th Amendment right to "Due Process" in that my attorney is adding and abetting the fraud in

District court by his refusal to demand the Grand Jury transcripts and witnesses to the Grand Jury based on the fact

there is strong evidence that will suggest the indictment was handed down Absent a Grand Jury, which is

"Extrinsic Fraud" on the court.

My attorney has failed to demand the reply from district court to the issues of the fraudulent indictment be made

under the penalty of perjury, which would Protect his client from Fraud, and he has refused to file for an appellate

bond for his client after his client requested that he do so.

My 6th Amendment Right is also being violated in that ineffective assistance of counsel, by my attorney preventing the

facts of fraud in the case from being entered into the record.

8/7/2019 Guy Neighbors Kansas

2/2