Gunnedah Basin HIA Proposal March 2014 · 2018. 8. 4. · SEPTEMBER 2014 Caroona District...
Transcript of Gunnedah Basin HIA Proposal March 2014 · 2018. 8. 4. · SEPTEMBER 2014 Caroona District...
GunnedahBasinHIAProposalDraft 1
GUNNEDAHBASIN
HEALTHIMPACTASSESSMENT
PROPOSAL
SEPTEMBER2014
CaroonaDistrictoverlookingtheLiverpoolPlainstotheLiverpoolRange
Contact:PhilLaird(Chairperson) NickyChirlian(Secretary)0428712622 [email protected] [email protected]
GunnedahBasinHIAProposalDraft 2
CONTENTS
1.Purposeofthisdocument..............................................................................................3
2.GoalsofGunnedahBasinHealthImpactAssessment(GB-HIA).....................................3
3.PotentialUsesofGunnedahBasinHealthImpactAssessment......................................4
4.Projectmanagementandsupervision............................................................................5
5.Timeframe......................................................................................................................5
6.JustificationforGunnedahBasinHealthImpactAssessment........................................7
7.GunnedahBasinLocationandDescription....................................................................8
APPENDIX1–GB-HIADraftTermsofReference23/10/12.............................................11
APPENDIX2–GB-HIAKeyquestionsfortheproject.......................................................17
APPENDIX3-Notesrelevanttopotentialmethodologies..............................................19First Component of Project - Identification of baseline levels .................................................................. 19
APPENDIX4–IndicativeWaterQualityBenchmarks.......................................................22Draft Data Management Guidelines - Forensic Groundwater Monitoring Program .............................. 22
Groundwater Test and Analyte Suite ......................................................................................................... 23APPENDIX5–IndicativeCSGAirQualityBenchmarks.....................................................24
References........................................................................................................................26
GunnedahBasinHIAProposalDraft 3
1.PurposeofthisdocumentTheGunnedahBasinHealthImpactSteeringCommittee,constitutedofcommunitygroupsandorganisationsintheGunnedahBasin,hasbeenchargedwithcommissioningastudyofthehealthandwelfarerisksofminingandgasextractioninthatbasin.RefertoAppendix1forDraftTermsofReference.Thisdocumentisintendedto:1. presenttheobjectivesandtheneedfortheGunnedahBasinHealthImpact
Assessmenttofundingbodies;andto
2. providebackgroundinformationforacallforExpressionsofInterestfortheGunnedahBasinHealthImpactAssessment.
2.GoalsofGunnedahBasinHealthImpactAssessment(GB-HIA)ThepurposeofthisproposedstudyistoanalysethehealthandwelfarerisksassociatedwithvariousminingandgasextractionscenariosfortheGunnedahBasin,andtoconsiderpotentialstrategiesfortheavoidance,minimisationandmanagementoftheserisks.Thestudyshould:1. Assessriskstophysical,mental,social/communityandenvironmental
wellbeing,potentiallyreflectingscenariosalignedtoNamoiCatchmentWaterStudy,broadenedtoincludedevelopmentscenariosacrosstheGunnedahBasin.
2. Establishbaselinelevelsofwaterquality,airqualityandnoiseintheregion,subjecttodefinedbenchmarks.(SeeAppendix3forindicativebenchmarks).
3. Identifycauseandeffect(orcausalpathways)ofarangeofidentifiedhealth
andwelfareissues.4. Considershort,mediumandlongtermincludingimpactonfuture
generations.Asaguide,shorttermwouldincludeplanningandrampup(1-2years);mediumtermwouldincludeconstruction,productionandextraction(2-5years)andlongtermwouldinclude(5yearsuntilaftermine/gaswellclosure);and,
5. IdentifyandconsidercumulativeimpactsTherisksuponwhichthestudywillfocusareintwocategories:1. Healthandwelfareeffectsofthedirectimpactsofminingandgasextraction,
notablyuponwater,airqualityandnoise;and
GunnedahBasinHIAProposalDraft 4
2. Risksassociatedwithdiverse‘secondorder’effectsofminingandgasextractionactivitiesincluding(forexample)impactsuponvulnerablepeopleorindustries,ofworkforcechanges,impactsuponhealthorwelfareservices,andimpactsofchangestothedemandforservicessuchashousing.
Broadly,theprojectwill:
§ covertheresidentsofGunnedahBasinandworkers(includingfly/drivein,fly/driveout),andidentifyvulnerablegroups,forexample,children,andagedpersons;
§ assessdifferentimpactsondifferentgroups;
§ determineifbenefits/costsmaybeexperiencedtoagreaterextentbyonegroupandnotothers,
§ identifywhatactionsmightbetakentomaximisepositiveandmitigatenegativehealthimpacts..
ArangeofpotentialrisksrelatingtohealthandwelfarearelistedinAppendix2.Itisexpectedthatthesuccessfultendererwillspecifyintheirproposalsthefollowingmatters
1. whichspecifichealthandwelfareriskstheywillevaluate,drawingonboththeinformationprovidedandtheirownknowledgeoftheissues;
2. thesourcesofdata(bothprimaryandsecondary)thattheyproposetouseandthesourcesofthisdata,foreachoftheriskstheyproposetoinvestigate;
3. themodellingorothermethodsthattheyproposetousefortheanalysisofthedataforeachtypeofrisk;
4. Theformoftheoutputsthatwillbedelivered,andinparticularthewaysinwhichthesewillbedeliveredandpresentedsoastomeetthepotentialusesoftheHIAasspecifiedbelow.
Thestudyshouldidentifythespecificriskstohealthandwelfare,theregionalandplanningimplicationsofthoserisks,theimplicationsfortheapprovalofminingandgasextractionprojects,andtheimplicationsforresourcingofhealthandwelfareintheregion.
3.PotentialUsesofGunnedahBasinHealthImpactAssessment1. Toprovidethecommunitywithclearandwell-researcheddataandanalysisto
informtheirdecisions,includingdecisionstowillinglyhost(ornot)miningactivities.
2. Toprovidethegovernmentwithspecificrecommendationsaboutsafeguardsandpolicysettingsthatarelikelytomaximisecommunityhealthandwelfareandtominimiserisks.
3. Toprovideminingcompanies,localgovernmentandotherkeystakeholders:
§ withspecificinformationaboutriskandriskmitigationoptions,
GunnedahBasinHIAProposalDraft 5
§ withpotentialopportunitiesthatmightarise;
§ recommendationsforstrategiestomaximisecommunityhealthandwelfare.
§ withproposedsolutionoravoidanceissueswhereissuesarise,
§ whereopportunitiesmightarise,exactlyhowthesemightbesecured.
4. Toprovideaframeworkforongoingtransparentdealingwithhealthandwelfareissuesincludinginterventionsthatmaybeneededtooptimisehealthandwelfareoutcomesforhostcommunitiesformining.
5. Toidentifycontingencies(positiveandnegative)andtospecifythesortsofconditionsandarrangementsthatoughttobeputinplaceupfront.Thisincludesaccountabilityforactionsandforcostsandproposalsforinvestmentsthatareneeded/desirable,andcompensationandriskaccountability.Identifywhatarrangementscanbeputinplacetoensurethatproposedaccountabilitiesandcontingencymeasurescanbemadebindingandeffective(notemptypromisesorassurances).Thisincludescostsharingandactionstoensurethatminingdoesleadtohealthinvestmentbenefitstothecommunity.
ItistheresponsibilityofthetenderertoensurethatthedataandanalysisareconductedanddeliveredinsuchawayastoensuretheutilityoftheHIAtomeettheseneeds.Withinthisrequirement,itisexpectedthatthetendererwilladdressarrangementstoensurethatthedataandanalysisremainreadilyaccessibleforthevarioususers,andinformsthatarecompatiblewiththeirdecision-makingrequirements.Tenderersareexpectedtoaddressissuesofongoingdataandinformationaccessintheirproposals,includinghighlightingandcostsofongoingprovisionoraccessthatarenotincludedinthecosting.
4.ProjectmanagementandsupervisionItisintendedthatthisprojectbesubjecttooversightbyTheGunnedahBasinHealthImpactSteeringCommittee.Fundingwillbeheldbyanindependentorganisation,suchastheNationalRuralHealthAlliance.TheCommitteeshallhavethefollowingauthority.
1. Toapprove(ornot)thefinalprojectplanpriortoanybindingcontractsandimplementationplans
2. Toapprove(ornot)acceptanceofanyprojectmilestonesincludingreports,relativetothecontractrequirements.
5.TimeframeTheprojectdeliverygoalis18months,withacompletiondateofJune2014.ItisexpectedthatmanyminingproposalswillbesubmittedtotheDepartmentofPlanningatthistime.Theproposedtimeframeforthecallingandlettingofatendertoconductthisprojectissetoutbelow.
GunnedahBasinHIAProposalDraft 6
“GunnedahHealthForum”(publicinformationmeeting)4August2012
ResolvedtoinitiateGunnedahBasinHIA
CallsforEOIsformembersofScopingCommitteeAugust2012
ScopingCommitteedevelopeddraftTermsofReferenceSeptember-October2012
SteeringCommitteeformedtorefineHIAStudy&ProcessesNovember2012
CurrentDate-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ApproachestoFundingBodiesforFunding
CallforEOIstoprepareTenderDocuments
EOIssubmittedbyindividuals/organisationstoprepareTenderDocumentsandRequestforTender
TenderDocumentsPrepared,RequestforTenderAdvertised
Tenderssubmittedbyindividuals/organisationstoconductpart,orall,oftheGunnedahBasinHealthImpactAssessment
GunnedahBasinHIAProposalDraft 7
6.JustificationforGunnedahBasinHealthImpactAssessmentTheneedforaGunnedahBasinHealthImpactAssessmentisbasedonthefollowing:1. CurrentNSWGovernmentPlanningprocessesarebasedonincrementalproject
approvals.Theseapprovalprocessesdonotaccountforcumulativeimpactsofdevelopments.Therearemajorconcernsincommunitiesregardingincreasedhealthproblems(forexampleBreretonetal,2008),resultingfromtheinterrelatedsystemsofhuman,socialandenvironment,includingwater,soil,floraandfauna.Theseconcernsarebasedonbothscientificandanecdotalevidenceofserioushealthandsocialharmsassociatedwithcoalminingandcoal-firedpowerstationsforpeoplelivinginsurroundingcommunities(Colagiurietal2012,p.iii).Thesehealthproblemsincludehigherrisksofcardiopulmonarydisease,chroniclungdisease,hypertensionandkidneydisease(Hendryx&Ahern,2008,citedbyDeloitteAccessEconomics,2012)
Despitethesepotentialdangerstohealth,therehavebeennosignificantformalepidemiologicalstudiesconductedanywhereinAustralia,onthehealthimpactsofmining(DeloitteAccessEconomics,2012p41).ThesignificantcostsandpolicyimplicationsoftheseriskshasnotbeenrecognizedbyAustralianGovernmentstodate.TheHealthImpactAssessmentwillassistinidentifyingcosts,enablepolicychanges,andinformplanningdecisions.
2. CommunitiesareconcernedthattheNSWGovernmentdoesnotconsiderthetruecostsandbenefitsofdevelopments.Whiletheyvalue,ineconomicterms,theprospectiveroyaltyincomefromcoalandcoalseamgascompanies,environmentalandsocialimpactsreceivelessattention.Thecostsofhealthimpactsonpopulationsdonotappeartobeconsideredeitherinthedevelopmentapprovalprocessesorinhealthserviceplanning.
3. TheNSW’sDepartmentofPlanningreportImpactsofUndergroundCoalMiningonNaturalFeaturesintheSouthernCoalfieldStrategicReview(2008)recommendstheapplicationofPrecautionaryPrinciple,which“requiresrisksassociatedwithotheroptionsandsocio-economicfactstobetakenintoaccount”(p107).Todate,thereappearstobelittleapplicationbygovernmentsoftheprecautionaryprinciple,regardingarangeofimpacts,includinghealth.TheHealthImpactAssessmentwillworktowardsredressingthis.
4. TheGunnedahBasincommunityiscommittedtopursuingatriplebottomline(TBL)assessmentofimpactspriortodevelopmentsbeingapproved.TheseTBLstudiesmusttransparentlyandobjectivelyidentifyandvaluethetruelong-termcumulativeeconomic,environmentalandsocialbenefitsandcostsofcoalandCSGextraction,ascomparedwithcurrentlandusesandpotentialalternativebusinessdevelopment.HealthisamajorcomponentofthesocialaspectsofTBLdecisionmaking,withinterrelatedimpactsontheeconomicaspectsduetocosts.TheHealthImpactAssessmentwillidentifytheseimpactsandimprovedecision-making.
GunnedahBasinHIAProposalDraft 8
ThehazardousnatureofchemicalsusedinCoalSeamGasextractionisdocumented(Lloyd-SmithandImmig,2011;Witteretal,2008).However,thereappearstohavebeenlittleworkdoneinAustralia.Thehealthriskstocommunitiesareunknown,andbasedonworkconductedoverseas,seemtobesubstantial.Thesesubstantialrisksequatetosignificanthumancosts,aswellassignificantfinancialcoststogovernments.TheHealthImpactAssessmentwillassistinidentifyingandvaluingpotentialhealthissuesrelatedtocoalseamgasextraction.
7.GunnedahBasinLocationandDescriptionThefocusoftheGB-HIAisthecoalfieldsandgasfieldsexistingwithinandadjoiningtheGunnedahBasin.TheGunnedahBasinisageologicalregioninNorthWestNSWcovering15,000squarekilometers(seemap1).ItjoinstheSydneyBasininthesouthandtheSuratBasininthenorth.Itsboundariesdonotcompletelycoincidewithcatchmentorlocalgovernmentboundaries.TheareaofinterestincludestheNamoiCatchmentportionoftheBasin(seemap2).
Theregionanditspopulationarefacinglarge-scaleexplorationdevelopmentsofcoalminesandcoalseamgas,andassociatedinfrastructure.MajortownsareQuirindi,Gunnedah,Narrabri,Coonamble,WalgettandMoree.Tamworthistheregion’sbiggesturbancentre,andalthoughcoalandcoalseamgasdevelopmentsliemorethan60kmtothewestofthecity,Tamworthislikelytobeimpactedbysocio-economicfactors,includingincreaseddemandforhealthservices.
TheGeographicBoundariesofthestudycanbelooselydescribedas;
NorthernExtent–theQueenslandBorder
SouthernExtent–theMurrurundiRange
EasternExtent-theMookiThrust
WesternExtent–thewesternedgeoftheCSGgasfieldswestofCoonamble
GunnedahBasinHIAProposalDraft 9
©StateofNewSouthWalesthroughDepartmentofTradeandInvestment,RegionalInfrastructureandServices
Map1:NSWcoalfields(NSWGovernmentTradeandInvestment,2012),showinglocationoftheGunnedahBasin.
GunnedahBasinHIAProposalDraft 10
Map2:CatchmentBoundaries,withNamoiCatchmentidentifiedinpink(CottonCRC,2011)
GunnedahBasinHIAProposalDraft 11
APPENDIX1–GB-HIADraftTermsofReference23/10/12
Item Comments/examples
Projecttitle GunnedahBasinHealthImpactAssessment
Background/Context
GunnedahBasinpopulationisfacinglarge-scaledevelopmentsofcoalminesandcoalseamgasdevelopment.CurrentStateGovernmentPlanningprocessesarebasedonincrementalprojectapprovals-notcumulative.
Thereismajorconcerninthecommunityregardingincreasedhealthissuesforenvironmentalsystems-humans,domesticanimals,flora,fauna,andwater.
CommunitiesareconcernedthattheNSWGovernmentmaynothavebalancedcostbenefitsofprospectiveroyaltiesvscostofhealthimpactstopopulation,orhaveconsideredpossiblehealthimpactsinitsHealthServicePlanning.
Thecommunityhasexpressedinterestinatriplebottomlineapproach:toconsiderhuman,social,environmentalfactorsonhealthimpacts.
Purpose Toassessthepotentialcumulativeimpactsofcurrentandpotentialcoalandcoalseamgasexploration,andotherextractiveindustriesanddevelopmentonthehealthofthepeoplelivingandworkingintheGunnedahBasin.
ObjectivesoftheProject
1. Toassesscurrentandpotentialdevelopmentsagainstscopedareasofimpact
2. Toidentifypotentialpositiveandnegativehealthimpactsresultingfromcurrentandpotentialcoal,CSGandotherextractiveindustriesintheGunnedahBasin.
3. To develop recommendations to facilitate theconsiderationandcostsofhealthimpactswithin:
a. Planningprocessesb. HealthServicesplanningc. Legislationd. Governmentpolicy
4. To informand influencekeydecisionmakerswithin thoseareas.
5. Tobuildcapacitytoundertakehealthimpactassessments.6. To link the HIA to relevant existing studies such as the
Namoi Catchment Water Study in order to develop an
GunnedahBasinHIAProposalDraft 12
integrated approach to protecting and promoting healthwithinnaturalresourcemanagement.
Projectscope Areasofimpact
• Assesspositiveandnegativeimpactsonphysical,mental,social/communityandenvironmentalwellbeing,usingsevenscenariosalignedtoNamoiCatchmentWaterStudy.
• Toidentifycauseandeffect(orcausalpathways)ofarangeofidentifiedhealthissues.
• Populationgroups:
• TheworkersandresidentsofGunnedahBasin• Theprojectwillassessdifferentimpactsondifferent
groupsanddetermineifbenefits/costsmaybeexperiencedtoagreaterextentbyonegroupandnotothers,andwhatactionsmightbetakentomaximisepositiveandmitigatenegativehealthimpacts.Vulnerablegroupsegchildren,agedpersonswillbeidentified.
• Afocuswillbegiventoassessingwhetherdifferentialimpactsareunfairandavoidable
Geographicalarea
• GunnedahBasin• WithintheHIAspecificgeographicalareasoffocusmaybe
definedTimeframeofimpacts
• Short,mediumandlongtermincludingimpactonfuturegenerations
• Cumulativeimpacts• IffeasiblethetimeframewillbealignedwiththeNamoi
WaterStudytoensurecomparabilityandintegrationPrioritisationofImpacts
• Impactswillbeprioritisedaccordingtolikelihoodofoccurrence.
Values Health: Therewasa consensus thathealth isa verybroad termandwe need to consider issues relating to equity and access tohealthservicesaspartofhealthandtheHIAprocess. Therewasagreementthatthereisawiderangeofsocial,physicalandmentaldeterminants that impact on people and affect their quality ofhealth at an individual and community level. The project willutiliseasocialorwellnessmodelofhealth,whichincorporatesthe
GunnedahBasinHIAProposalDraft 13
socialdeterminantsofhealthandequity.
Equity: Theproject adopts theprinciple of equitable distributionof health outcomes and reducing the differences in populationhealthstatusandmortalityrates.
Evidence:ThegroupdiscussedsomeofthetypesofevidencethatcouldberelevanttotheHIA.Differenttypesofevidencewillneedtobegatheredincludingbothqualitativeandquantitativeevidence.Thegroupidentifiedthattherewillneedtobefurtherdiscussionabouthowdifferenttypesofevidencewillbevaluedandhowtoaddressconflictingsourcesofevidence.
Participation:TherewasagreementthattheHIAshouldincorporateaparticipatoryprocessthatwillbeopentotheinvolvementofallrelevantstakeholders.
Theprecautionaryprincipletobeadopted.
TypeofHIA Communityled.
DepthofHIA Comprehensive.
Governance INCORPORATION:GunnedahBasinHIAAssociationInc.
adopttheModelconstitution,comprisedof:
• 5members.Toholdthecontractsforfunding.• CommitteemembersfromScopingCommittee
Committeemembership
• +Referencegroup(=Scopingcommittee–shortterm,2meetings)
• +Steering/managementcommittee(6–10members),
• Widergroup=stakeholdersTermsofreferencerequired.
• UniversityTechnicalexpert• Projectmanager• Independentconsultanttowritereport
Roleofcommittee
SteeringCommitteeisGovernanceCommittee,withresponsibilityforcarriageofprocess.Termsofreferencerequired.
Rolesandresponsibilitiesofcommitteemembers
• .Termsofreferencerequired.
Decision Quorum
GunnedahBasinHIAProposalDraft 14
making Consensusdecisionmaking,bymajorityvote.
Howtodealwithconflictandtheinabilityto
achieveconsensus
Peerreview Thereportwillbeindependentlypeerreviewed.
ChangestoTOR (howchangestothetermsofreferencewillbe
handledshouldtheyneedtobemade)
• ChangestotermsofreferencebelegitimizedbyquorumdecisionatStakeholdermeetings
• SmallerprocesschangescouldbemadebySteeringCommittee
• GrievanceprocesstobedevelopedIntellectualproperty
Report:TheHIAreportwillbecommunityledandthereforetheGunnedahBasinHIAIncwillownthereportanditwillbepublicallyavailable.
Budgetandsourcesoffunding
Tobedetermined.
Projectplan Timeframe:ItwasagreedthattheprojectTermsofReferenceandprojectplanshouldbecompletebytheendof2012.TheBusinessPlanshouldbecompletebytheendof2012toincludecostingoftheactivitiesbelow.CosttobedeterminedbyinvestigationofsimilarprojectswithSingletonCouncilAsacomprehensiveassessmenttheremayalsobesomeshorterterm/intermediateoutputsfromtheHIAtoinformcurrentdecision-makingprocesses.TherewassuggestionthattheHIAprocessmaytakeapproximately18months.
Activities:
• Profile–(ieoverviewofcurrentdataofdemographics,readilyavailable).Therewassupportfordevelopingacommunityprofilethatcouldbeusedasastandaloneproductandformthebasisformonitoringofimpacts.Thiswouldincludedemographicandhealthdata.HNEHealthwillprovidesupportfortheprovisionofhealthservicedata.Inaddition,therewassomediscussionbutnodecisionaboutgatheringadditionalprimarydatathrough,forexample,lungfunctiontestsandsurveys,currentbaselinedataonairqualityandnoise.Wherepossibledatawillbedisaggregatedtoidentifydifferencesbetweenpopulationgroups.
• Literaturereviews–therearesomealreadyexisting
GunnedahBasinHIAProposalDraft 15
literaturereviewsofhealthimpactsrelatedtoCoalandCSGmining.Thesewillneedtobeassessedforqualityandsuitability.Inaddition,literaturereviewsmayneedtobecommissionedusingstandardisedmethodsofreview,similartoaCochranereview.Upcomingcoalliteraturereviewtobeused.
• Localknowledge-therewasagreementthatevidenceshouldbegatheredfromthelocalcommunityandotherrelevantstakeholders.Thiswouldincludeidentifyinglocalconcernsandanxieties,impactsonlivingconditionsandhowpeoplelivetheirlives,contextualinformation,andunanticipatedimpacts.
• Modellingofhealthimpacts–someofthepotentialpriorityimpactsrelatetothephysicalenvironment(airqualityandnoise).TherewasbroadagreementthattheHIAshouldincludeaquantitativeriskassessment(modelling)thesepotentialhealthimpactsaccordingtoscenariosthatwillbedevelopedaspartoftheHIA.Thiswillrequirecommissioningexpertstocarryoutthiswork.
Potentialimpactsofcoalminingandcoalseamgasextractionidentifiedinscopingmeeting:
Alistofpotentialimpacts/determinantsidentifiedintheWHIASUGuidetoassessingthehealthandwellbeingimpactsofopencastminingiwasusedasastartingpointfordiscussion.SurveysofdamagedcommunitiesrequestedbySteveRobinsonegdisabilityadjustedlifeyears,morbidityandmortality.ThescopinggroupagreedthattheseareallapplicabletotheGunnedaharea.Additionalimpacts(inbold)wereidentifiedbycommitteemembers.Thelistincludesbutisnotlimitedtothefollowingdeterminantsandoutcomes:
• Airquality(Particulatematter,Nitrogendioxide,Dust)• Noise• Visualimpact• Lightpollution• Vibration• Lossofamenity
• Solastalgia• Severanceandsocialcapital
• Lackofvolunteers• Mentalhealthwellbeing
• Anxiety,stress,lossofcontrol,uncertainty• Housing
• AffordableHousing• Lackofinfrastructure
GunnedahBasinHIAProposalDraft 16
• AgriculturalLanddevaluation• Services
• AccesstoGPs• AccesstoHospitals• AccesstoCommunityHealth• Localinfrastructure
• Employment• employmentthroughmining• lackoffarmworkers
• Transport• Increasedtraffic• Increasedtrafficaccidents• Decreasedairquality
• Safety• Crime• Domesticviolence
• Lifestyle• Alcoholconsumption• Sexuallytransmitteddisease• Physicalactivity
• Groundwater• Drinkingwaterquality
Inadditionthescopinggroupidentifiedarangeofpotentialhealthoutcomes:
• RespiratoryDisease(measuringlungfunctioncurrentlyandpredictingtothefuture)
• Cardiovasculardisease• Cancer• Autism• ADHD• Neurologicaldisorders(specific)• Sexuallytransmitteddisease• Headaches• Nosebleeds• Depression• Suicide• Anxietydisorders• SleepdisordersusingthePittsburghSleepQualityIndex.
Otherpotentialoutcomesasidentifiedthroughliteraturereview
GunnedahBasinHIAProposalDraft 17
APPENDIX2–GB-HIAKeyquestionsfortheproject
WhatistheimpactofcoalandcoalseamgasdevelopmentsoncommunityhealthandwellbeingintheGunnedahBasin?Thesequestionsinclude,butnotlimitedtothefollowing:
LIVINGCONDITIONS&WORKINGCONDITIONS
WORKENVIRONMENT UNEMPLOYMENT
EDUCATION WATERANDSANITATION
• DrinkingwaterqualityAGRICULTUREANDFOODPRODUCTION HEALTHCARESERVICES
• AccesstoGPs• AccesstoHospitals• AccesstoCommunity
Health/AlliedHealth HOUSING
• AffordableHousing• Lackofinfrastructure• AgriculturalLanddevaluation
HEALTHOUTCOMES
• RespiratoryDisease• Cardiovasculardisease• Cancer• Autism• ADHD• Neurologicaldisorders(specific)• Sexuallytransmitteddisease• Headaches• Nosebleeds• Depression• Suicide• Anxietydisorders
PHYSICALOUTCOMES:
• Airquality• Waterquality• Waterquantity.• Increasedtraffic• Increasedtrafficaccidents
MEASURABLESSOCIO:
• Domesticviolence• Solastalgia• Lossofamenity
QUALITATIVE/ANECDOTAL
• CommunityDivision• Equity
GunnedahBasinHIAProposalDraft 18
• Increasedcrime• Lackofvolunteers
• Whatarethecurrentbaselinelevelsfor:groundandsurfacewaterquality,includingorganic,inorganicandmicrobiallevels?
• Whatarethecurrentbaselinelevelsforairqualityincludingparticulatematter,nitrousoxides,methaneandothergas?
• WhatarethecurrentbaselinelevelsforillnessanddisabilityintheGunnedahBasin?
• Whatarethepredictedincidenceincreaseandcostsof“miningrelatedillness”(e.g.Asthma,cardiovascularillness)andaccidentsoverthenext30years(accordingtopredictedminelife)intheGunnedahBasin.
• WhatisthepredictedcostofsocialdisruptionintheGunnedahBasinoverthepredictedminelife.
• WhatwillbetherequiredincreaseinserviceinfrastructureandcostofsamewithintheGunnedahBasinoverthepredictedminelife?
• WhatimpacttotheDALY’sdotheNamoiWaterStudyscenarioshave?• Whatcontingencyplansarerequiredforanyincreasedhealthcost?• WhatbindingobligationsareheldbytheDepartmentofPlanningtosupport
anyadditionalcosts?Theinformationtobepresentedasa30yearitemisedcostanalysis,mappingofhighriskareasas“nogo”zones.
GunnedahBasinHIAProposalDraft 19
APPENDIX3-Notesrelevanttopotentialmethodologies
TheProjectmaybeconductedintwocomponents,witheachofthesecomponentsbeingfurtherdividedintospecificparts,asdescribedbelow.
FirstComponentofProject-Identificationofbaselinelevels
a) airandnoisequality,
b) waterquality,
c) existinghealthlevelsinthepopulation.Thefollowingprocessisproposed:
§ Specificbaselineparameterrequirements,andthresholds,willbedeterminedbasedoncurrentknowledge.Thiswillincludeinvestigationofnumberofdatapointsandmeasurementtimeframestoenablestatisticalsignificantresults.
§ Itislikelythatwithfurtherresearchintocoalandcoalseamgas
hazards,thatmoreparameterswillberequiredinthefuture.Independentmonitoringandtrendanalysiswillusedtodeterminebaselineslevels.Followingbaselinedatacollection,monitoringandtrendanalysiswillcontinue,toenableidentificationoffuturechangesandtrends.
§ WaterQualityManagementandBaselineAirQualityandNoise
ManagementProjectTeamswilloversightthework.§ Therewillbethreethemesasdetailedbelow:
o WaterQuality–monitoringstationswillbesetuptomonitorsurfaceandgroundwater,basedonexpertrecommendations.DraftDataManagementGuidelines,andarecommendedGroundWaterAnalyteSuiteappearinAppendix4.Similarguidelinesandrecommendedtestingregimewillbedeterminedforsurfacewater.
o AirQualityandNoise-monitoringstationswillbesetup
inlocationsrecommendedbyexperts.DraftrecommendationforairtoxinsincoalseamgasfieldsthatwillbemonitoredarelistedinAppendix5.Informationregardingrelevanttoxinstobemonitoredincoalfieldswillbesourced,andinformedbyDepartmentofEnvironment
GunnedahBasinHIAProposalDraft 20
ClimateChangeandWater(2011).Noisemonitoringwillbeimplementedontheadviceofexperts.
o Existinghealthlevelsinthepopulation–baseleveldata
fromNSWHealthandotherorganisationswillbecollated.Thiswillfocusonhealthissueslikelytobeimpactedbycoalandcoalseamgasextraction,basedonresearchandanecdotalevidencefromothernationalandinternationalcoalandcoalseamgasregions.SomeoftheseissuesarelistedinAppendix2.
SecondComponent–identificationofimpacts,modelingandassessmentrisksofbasedonfuturedevelopmentscenarios,andriskassessment,asdetailedbelow:
a) Identificationofimpactstophysical,mental,socialandenvironmental
healthfromcoalandcoalseamgasexplorationandextraction,includingexisting,proposedandpotentialdevelopments;
b) modelingofimpactsbasedondevelopmentscenariosusedinNamoi
CatchmentWaterStudyc) riskassessmentandmappingofmodeledimpactsd) recommendationsofstrategiesthatwillminimisethenegative
impactsandcapitaliseonthebenefits.
PotentialMethodologies
ThereareanumberofmethodologiesandsystemsthatmaybeusedtoguideandconducttheHIA.Thesewillneedtobeassessedintermsofrelevance,andabilitytointegratewitheachother.Examplesofsystems,guidelinesandtoolsareasfollows:
§ HealthImpactAssessment:aPracticalGuide(Harrisetal,2007)willprovidethebroadguidelinesofthestudy.
§ ItisanticipatedthatanymodellingfortheHIAwillusethecoalandcoalseam
gasdevelopmentscenariosthatformedthebasefortheNamoiCatchmentWaterStudy(Schlumberger,2012)modelling.Thiswillprovideconsistencyandwillenablemappingoflevelsofrisk,similartomapspresentedintheNamoiCatchmentWaterStudy.
GunnedahBasinHIAProposalDraft 21
§ ThesuitabilityandpotentialforusingthecumulativeriskframeworkdevelopedforNamoiCatchmentManagementAuthoritybyEcologicalAustraliaPtyLtd(2011)forNRMassetswillbeinvestigated.
§ TheresilienceapproachanduseofthresholdsaspertheNamoiCatchment
ManagementAuthority’sCatchmentActionPlan(thismayassistwithappropriatethresholdidentificationforbaselinedatamonitoring.)
§ CostBenefitAnalysisislikelytoprovideausefulandobjectivetooltoidentify
costsofhealthimpacts.Thelatestthinkingandrecommendationsforimpactswhicharedifficulttomeasureinapurelyeconomicsensewillneedtobeinvestigated,forexampleDeloitteAccessEconomics(2012,p11)
§ Asystemsandadaptivemanagementapproachtocumulativeimpact
identificationandmonitoring.ForexampleFranksetal(2010),“CumulativeImpacts-AGoodPracticeGuidefortheAustralianCoalMiningIndustry.”
GunnedahBasinHIAProposalDraft 22
APPENDIX4–IndicativeWaterQualityBenchmarks
DraftDataManagementGuidelines-ForensicGroundwaterMonitoringProgram
GunnedahBasinHIAProposalDraft 23
GroundwaterTestandAnalyteSuite
GunnedahBasinHIAProposalDraft 24
APPENDIX5–IndicativeCSGAirQualityBenchmarksCoalSeamGas-Compoundstobemonitored
InformationprovidedbyJohnPolglase,Geochemist
Gases listed in the groundwater benchmark (Appendix 3) plus the following medium to high molecular weight Volatile Organic compounds (VOCs) are some 'suspects' that have been gas field tested elsewhere, and ought to be considered for inclusion in an evolving benchmark used by whoever / wherever emissions assessments are done: Gp 1 Butane Butane, 2-methyl- Pentane Pentane, 3-methyl- Hexane Hexane, 3-methyl- Cyclohexane Methylcyclohexane Heptane Heptane, 2,2,4,6,6-pentamethyl- Hexadecane Heptadecane Gp 2 Benzene 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene Toluene m/p-Xylene o-Xylene Phenol Ethylbenzene Naphthalene alpha-Pinene Gp 3 Phenylmaleic anhydride Benzothiazole 1-Hexanol, 2-ethyl- Ethyl acetate background and 'up-wind' levels of organic and inorganic gases naturally emitted from coal seam bearing sedimentary basins must also be monitored.
GunnedahBasinHIAProposalDraft 25
CoalSeamGas–AirToxicstobemonitored
InformationprovidedbyDrMariannLloyd-SmithPhD(Law)SeniorAdvisor,IPEN-InternationalPOPsEliminationNetwork
SeniorAdvisor,NationalToxicsNetworkInc.
list of relevant air toxics :
Butane Butane, 2-methyl- Pentane Pentane, 3-methyl- Hexane Hexane, 3-methyl- Cyclohexane Methylcyclohexane Heptane Heptane, 2,2,4,6,6-pentamethyl- Hexadecane Heptadecane Benzene 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene Toluene m/p-Xylene o-Xylene Phenol Ethylbenzene Naphthalene alpha-Pinene
Phenylmaleic anhydride Benzothiazole 1-Hexanol, 2-ethyl- Ethyl acetate
I would also add the CFCs, Dichlorodifluoromethane & Trichlorofluoromethane and methylene chloride/dichloromethane as well as they are turning up. The National Measurement Institute does a volatile screen that includes all of these and then reports on the top 10 detected, or more depending on costs.
References
GunnedahBasinHIAProposalDraft 26
Brereton,D,Moran,C,McIlwain,G,McIntosh,J,Parkinson,K2008,‘Assessingthecumulativeimpactsofminingonregionalcommunities:anexploratorystudyofcoalminingintheMuswellbrookareasofNSW’,CentreforSocialResponsibilityinMining&CentreforWaterintheMineralsIndustry,SustainableMineralsInstitute,TheUniversityofQueensland.
ColagiuriR,CochraneJ,GirgisS,2012,HealthandSocialHarmsofCoalMininginLocalCommunities:SpotlightontheHunterRegion.BeyondZeroEmissions,Melbourne,October2012.ISBN:978-1-74210-292-4
CottonCatchmentCommunitiesCRC,2011,NamoiCatchment,downloadedfrom: http://www.cottoncrc.org.au/catchments/My_Catchments/Namoi_CatchmentDeloitteAccessEconomics,2012,EconomicandsocialimpactsoftheWarkworthExtensionProject,SingletonCouncil.
DepartmentofEnvironmentClimateChangeandWater(2011),CompendiumofUpperHunterAmbientAirQualityMonitoringData,15February2011
EcologicalAustraliaPtyLtd,2011,ProposedFrameworkforAssessingtheCumulativeRiskofMiningonNaturalResourceAssetsintheNamoiCatchment,Project11COFNRM-006preparedfortheNamoiCMA,September2011.
Franks,D,Fidler,C,Brereton,D,Vanclay,FandP,Clark,2009,LeadingPracticeStrategiesforAddressingtheSocialImpactsofResourceDevelopmentsCentreforSocialResponsibilityinMining,SustainableMineralsInstitute,TheUniversityofQueensland.BriefingpaperfortheDepartmentofEmployment,EconomicDevelopmentandInnovation,QueenslandGovernment,Brisbane.
Franks,DM,Brereton,D,Moran,CJ,Sarker,T,andCohen,T.,2010,CumulativeImpacts-AGoodPracticeGuideForTheAustralianCoalMiningIndustry,CentreforSocialResponsibilityinMining&CentreforWaterintheMineralsIndustry,SustainableMineralsInstitute,TheUniversityofQueensland.AustralianCoalAssociationResearchProgram,Brisbane,downloadedfrom
http://www.csrm.uq.edu.au/docs/CSRM%20SMI%20Good%20Practice%20Guide%20document%20LR.PDFHarris,P.,Harris-Roxas,B.,Harris,E.,andKemp,L.,2007,HealthImpactAssessment:aPracticalGuide,Sydney,CentreforHealthEquityTraining,ResearchandEvaluation(CHETRE),PartoftheUNSWResearchCentreforPrimaryHealthCareandEquity,UNSW.
GunnedahBasinHIAProposalDraft 27
Lloyd-Smith,M.,andImmig,J,2011,SubmissiononbehalfoftheToxicsNetworkInc,toNSWEnquiryintoCoalSeamGas,LegislativeCouncilNSWStandingCommitteeNo.5,downloadedfrom
http://www.ntn.org.au/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/NTN-submission-to-the-NSW-Inquiry-Into-Coal-Seam-Gas3.pdf
NamoiCatchmentManagementAuthority,2012,NamoiCatchmentActionPlan2010-2020,downloadedfrom
http://www.namoi.cma.nsw.gov.au/931351.html?5NSWGovernmentTradeandInvestment:ResourcesandEnergy(2012)MapofNSWCoalfields,downloadedfrom:
http://www.resources.nsw.gov.au/resources/coal/coalfieldsNSWDepartmentofPlanning,2008,ImpactsofUndergroundCoalMiningonNaturalFeaturesintheSouthernCoalfieldStrategicReview,Sydney.
SchlumbergerWaterServices,2012,NamoiCatchmentWaterStudy,PreparedforDepartmentofTradeandInvestment,RegionalInfrastructureandServices,NSWGovernment,Australia
WalesHIASupportUnit.(2011)Aguidetoassessingthehealthandwellbeingimpactsofopencastmining.WHIASU:Cardiff
Witter,R.,Stinson,K.,Sackett,H.,Putter,S.,Kinney,G.,Teitelbaum,D.,andNewman,L.,2008,PotentialExposure-RelatedHumanHealthEffectsofOilandGasDevelopment:ALiteratureReview(2003-2008),ColoradoSchoolofPublicHealth,UniversityofColoradoDenver.