Gun And Ammunition Policy In The United States

20
Gun and Ammunition Policy in the United States By Mitch Enriquez

description

Final policy project presentation

Transcript of Gun And Ammunition Policy In The United States

Page 1: Gun And Ammunition Policy In The United States

Gun and Ammunition Policy in the United States

By Mitch Enriquez

Page 2: Gun And Ammunition Policy In The United States

The 2nd Ammendment

Page 3: Gun And Ammunition Policy In The United States

The two important issues Gun regulation

Ammunition Regulation

Page 4: Gun And Ammunition Policy In The United States

Current Gun laws

The four basic requirements -Sanity -Criminal record -Age -Citizenship

Page 5: Gun And Ammunition Policy In The United States

CCW (Concealed Carry Weapon)

Page 6: Gun And Ammunition Policy In The United States

Then how do criminals obtain firearms?

Page 7: Gun And Ammunition Policy In The United States

Ammunition laws in California

Page 8: Gun And Ammunition Policy In The United States

California Assembly bill 962

Page 9: Gun And Ammunition Policy In The United States

Repercussions of C. A. bill 962

Page 10: Gun And Ammunition Policy In The United States

Advataged

Page 11: Gun And Ammunition Policy In The United States

Contenders

Page 12: Gun And Ammunition Policy In The United States

Dependants

Page 13: Gun And Ammunition Policy In The United States

Deviants

Page 14: Gun And Ammunition Policy In The United States

California Assembly bill 962 effectiveness

Page 15: Gun And Ammunition Policy In The United States

The Ammunition Limit

Page 16: Gun And Ammunition Policy In The United States

962 shuts down interstate commerce

Page 17: Gun And Ammunition Policy In The United States

Opponents to California AB 962

Page 18: Gun And Ammunition Policy In The United States

How this bill will affect the rest of the nation

Page 19: Gun And Ammunition Policy In The United States

How local vendors are affected

Page 20: Gun And Ammunition Policy In The United States

In Conclusion

Do you think that it is fair that a minority can suppress a majority?

And in what ways can we really show what the majority really thinks?