Guillermo Foladori - UNITAR Applications.pdf · Guillermo Foladori ReLANS Red Latinoamericana de...
-
Upload
truongthien -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Guillermo Foladori - UNITAR Applications.pdf · Guillermo Foladori ReLANS Red Latinoamericana de...
Guillermo FoladoriReLANS
Red Latinoamericana de Nanotecnología y Sociedad
Latin American Nanotechnology& Society Network
Outline1. The Context: Towards a knowledge
society?
2. Nanotechnology initiatives and capabilities in Latin America
3. Challenges
Inequality landscape in Latin America
• 540 million inhabitants • 284 million live in poverty• 60 million children do not have access to potable
water• 30 million children suffer from malnutrition
(ECLAC, 2007, 2008; FAO, 2008)
• Latin America & Caribbean is the most unequal region in the world, with 10 out of the 15 most unequal countries in the world (Bolivia, Haiti and Brazil at the top)
(UNDP, 2010)
Knowledge Economy
• Knowledge is becoming the main source of wealth; it is decisive for innovation
• Late industrialized countries (Japan, “Asian tigers” etc. show it is possible
The question is how to get there….?
Since late 90´s World Bank, OCDE, etc. pushed forward the knowledge economy paradigm
(NT part of it.)
But, with a strategy very different from
that of the late industrialized countries:
No improvement in worker's conditions
Participation of workers in economic growth (increase in salaries, etc.) and qualification of workforce
No control of companies behavior
Government supervising companies activities (rewarding & punishing)
Suddenly and almost unrestricted opened of the market
Slow & step by step opened of the market
Creation of Centers of excellence at post graduate level
Raising educational levels from elementary to university
Latin AmericaLate ind. countries
Besides, in Latin America,
• Most countries without a diagnosis on where to invest in NT (no priorities)
• Many countries with scarce science tradition embarked in NT development
• No transparency for consumers…
Kay, L & Shapira, Philip (2008). Developing nanotechnology in Latin America. Journal of Nanoparticle Research
Publications
BrazilInvestment in S&T/GDP = 1,1 %
• 2001 - S&TM funded first four NT research networks
• 2004 - First Program on NT in S&TM Plan• 2009 Nanotechnology Competitiveness Forum –
government, business, labor, and university• More than 1300 researchers + 2000 postgrad.
students• 150 companies developing nanotechnologies;
half of them with products on the market
USP, UNESP, UNICAMP, EMBRAPA, PUC, IPT,UFSCar, INPE, LNLS, CNEN, UMC,
CBPF, CETUC, UERJ, UFRJ, FIOCRUZ, IMA, PEMM/COPPE,
PUC, UFF
UFMG, FUNREI, UFU, SUFVCDTN,
CETEC, UFOP
UFPR, UEM, UEPG
UFSC
UFRGS
CEFET
UFC
UFRN, UERN,
UFA
UFPB
UFPE
UnB
UFG
UFBA
MexicoInvestment in S&T/GDP = 0,4 %
• 2001 - NT strategic area in S&T Policy• Several bilateral agreements between
Mexican and EUA universities and research centers
• High Tech Industrial Parks • 2007 Two National NT labs• 2009 – National Nanotechnology Network –
integrate all research groups in NT• More than 500 researchers in 50 or more
centers• About 60 companies
Argentina Investment in S&T/GDP =0,42%
• 2006 – Argentinean Foundation for Nanotechnology- Four nanotechnology networks + 1
• Interdisciplinary Center of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (connecting several institutions)
• About 150 researchers• More than 20 companies use nanotechnology
Centro AtomicoBariloche (Inst. Balseiro)
U. Buenos Aires, U. Quilmes, C.A. Constituyentes, C.A. EzeizaU.N. La PlataU. San MartínCITEFA
U.N. Rio CuartoU.N. Cordoba
U.N. San Luis
INTEL
IMBECU
UNER
UNE
UNT
Nanotech Labs Brazil • 1985. LAS (Associated Laboratory of Sensors and Materials). INPE – MCT. Sao Paulo. (Upgraded 2007). • CBPF (Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas), MCT., Rio de Janeiro.
1994 Nanoscopie Lab. 2005 LabNano (Nanoscience and NT Multiusers Lab).
• 1997. LNLS (National Synchrotron Light Lab.), São Paulo. (Only facility of the type in Latin America). 2008 Centro de Nanociencia e Nanotecnologia. 2011 SIRIUS (2nd. Synchrotron Light Lab -partnership with Argentina).
• 2002. Millennium Institute in Nanotechnology. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. MG.. • 2005. CETENE (Center for Strategic Technologies of the Northeastern), MCT. Pernambuco. • 2005. Lateo (Laboratory for Theoretical Nanometrology). NCNM (National Center on Nanometrology), INMETRO,
Rio de Janeiro. 2008. Titan, Tecnai, NanoLab 600.
• 2006 CNANO (Nanosciences and NT Virtual Center). Coordinates: Advance Polymer Lab; Micro & Nanoelectronics Lab; Bio-Macro Molecules Lab; Spectroscopia Laser & Optic films Lab; Ceramic Materials Lab; Methods Lab; Catalysis Lab.
• 2008. CEITEC S.A. (National Center on Advanced Electronic Technology), Rio Grande do Sul. • 2009. LNNA (National NT Laboratory for Agribusiness), EMBRAPA, São Paulo. • LNCC (Scientific Computation National Laboratory). MCT. Rio de Janeiro • CenPRA (Research Center Renato Archer), MCT. Informatics Industrial Park, São Paulo. [Following other universities and public institutions with NT labs: Federal University of Pernambuco, Federal University of Ceará, Federal University of Rio do Norte, Federal University of Bahia, Federal University of Minas Gerais; Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Federal University of Sao Carlos, Federal University of Paraná, Federal University of Uberlandia, Federal University of Santa Catarina, University of Brasilia, University of Sao Paulo, State University of Sao Paulo, University of Campinas, Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Institute of Technology Research of the State of Sao Paulo, Brazilian Center for Physical Research, Osvaldo Cruz Foundation, Institute for Advanced Studies of the Air Force, Technology Center of the Navy, Technology Center of the Army, Technology Center for the Development of Nuclear Energy.
Nanotech Labs Mexico • 1995. UAM-I. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Lab. (Upgraded 2006 and 2009), UAM I., D.F.
2004. NT and Molecular Engineering Lab; NT Chemical Lab; 2007. CI3M (National Research Center on Imagenology & Biomedical Instrumentation).
• 1996. CFATA (Center for Applied Physics and Advanced Technology), UNAM-Qro. Querétaro. • 2002. Central Microscopy Lab. IFUNAM, UNAM, D.F. • 2004. UAM-X – INNN (Lab. of NT applied to Medicine), INNN “MVS” (Secretaría de Salud), D.F. • 2005. LANGEBIO (National Lab. in Genomics for BioDiversity), CINVESTAV-Gjto, IPN, Guanajuato. • 2006. Nanotronic Lab. BUAP, Puebla. • 2006. Electronic Microscopy of Ultra High Resolution, IMP, D.F. • 2007. LINAN (National Lab. for Nanoscience and NT Research), IPICyT -CONACYT, San Luis Potosí. • 2007. NaNoTeCH (National NT Lab). CIMAV- CONACYT, Chihuahua. • 2008. CNyN (Center of Nanosciences & NT).UNAM – Ensenada, Baja California Norte. • 2008. CIIDIT (Center for Innovation Research and Development in Engineering and Technology), UANL, Nuevo
León. [titan] • 2008. LabMic. (Electronic Microscopy Lab), CIQA – CONACYT, Coahuila. • 2009. Center of Nanosciences, Micro & NT, CINVESTAV -Qro, IPN, Queretaro. • 2010. Lab. for Innovation in NT & MEMS. INAOE, Puebla. • 2010. MICRONA (Micro & Nanotechnology Lab). UV. Veracruz. • CENAM (National Center on Metrology), Querétaro. • Department of Electric Engineering. CINVESTAV – Zco, IPN. D.F. • CTS (Semiconductors Technology Center). CINVESTAV – Gdja, IPN, Guadalajara.
Nanotech Labs Argentina • 1992. INIFTA (Lab. of Microscopy and Physic-chemical Surface), CONICET / UNLP, P. Bs. As. • 1995. INQUIMAE (Inst. of Materials Chemist and Physics, Environment and Energy), CONICET / UBA, Cap.
Federal. • 1999. Nanoscopies Lab., INTI, P. Bs. As. (Upgraded 2005). • 2002 CINSO (Center for Research on Solids), CITEDEF - Ministry of Defense, P. Bs. As. • 2005. Strategic Design for Targeting of Drugs Lab., UNQ, P. Bs. As. • 2007. Institute of Nanoscience and NT, Bariloche Atomic Center, CNEA, P. Río Negro. (Upgraded 2007, 2009). • Centro Atómico Constituyentes, CNEA, P. Bs. As. • 2007. Lab. of Tissue Engineering, Regenerative Medicine and Cellular Therapies, Cucaiba – Gob. de la P. de Bs.
As., P. de Bs. As. • 2008. INTEMA (Center for Material Science & Technology), CONICET / UNDMP, P. Bs. As. • LaFiSo (Phisics of Solid Lab). UNT. Tucumán.
Nanotechnology companies in México
México
02468
10121416
Chem
icals
Pharmaceutical
Cosm
etics
Medical devices
Textiles and
Nanoestructured
Petrochemical
Biotechn
ology
Electron
ic
Machines and
Hom
e App
liances
Mineral
Services fo
r
Energy
Agriculture and
Food
and
drinks
Constructio
n
Metallurgical
Telecommun
icati
Paper and
Other sectors*
Number of firms
Nanotechnology companies in Argentina -2009
0123456
Che
mic
als
Pha
rmac
eutic
al
Med
ical
dev
ices
Nan
oest
ruct
ured
Mat
eria
ls
Ele
ctro
nics
Mac
hine
s an
dde
vice
s
Ser
vice
s fo
rin
dust
ry
Agr
icul
ture
and
Cat
tle
Food
and
drin
ks
Env
ironm
enta
lre
med
iatio
n
Sectors
Num
ber o
f com
pani
esNanotechnology companies in Argentina
Common features of NT policies in LA• Goal: To increase competitiveness to gain broader
access to global market – social benefits expected as a mechanical consequence
• Considerable efforts to develop research infrastructure and qualify humans resources but all at high level.
• Increasing formal and informal networking within the region and with other regions
• Slight consideration of social implications and risks
• Scarce public information
• Poor level of information & no regulation
3. Challenges
Will the path for NT development be an instrument for improving the standard of living? Or just to increase international
competitiveness?
• Health & Environmental Risks• Regulation
– Economic international accounting– Transportation issues– Patents and Intellectual Property rights– Health/environment– Worker's safety … (UITA – collect. Contracts)
• Ethical issues (Transhumanism…)• Social implications: consumers acceptance;
impact on employment
How does nanotechnology affect employment?
Based on the analysis of NT products four main trends can be identified:
1. Are more efficient than similar existing ones
2. Are multifunctional
3. Require different and/or less raw materials4. Have a longer market life spam
All these connect to increasing unemployment
Products are more efficient 1Nanoprene (tires): more roadholding and resistance toabrasive wear. Lifespan 15%+
Lanxess
Amsoil (filters): captures 5 times dust and captures 2.5 times contaminants. Lifespan400%+
Products are more efficient 2
Behr (ink): resistance towater, mold, strains andgrease
DEPT (remediation): for textil andpaper industries. 100% more efficient than active carbonmethods35
Products are multifunctional 1
TipTop. GWFoods (bread): Nano-Omega3
Nutriceutical
Qinghuangdao Ialji Ring Nano-Product Co. Ltd (Tea): with nano-selenio
Nouwell E. (cosmetic): Transfers vitamine E andparfume from textil to skin
LifeShirt (health control): monitors respiratory activity, cardiac activity, storesinformation in a portable device
Products are multifunctional 2
Products require less or different rawmaterial 1
BMC (byckes): frames23% lighter
Abraxane (drug): paclitaxelnanoencapsulate in albumina. Reduces amout of the drug
Products require less or different rawmaterial 2
Elko’s (screen): CNT in layers OLED. (Organic light-emitting materials, do not require any backlight and filtering systems as in LCDs).
BMW (body-car): polymers
Products have a long lasting life span in the market 1
Miller (beer): 6 months onsupermarket shelves. Ceramic bottles
Suzano (films): plastic films double lifespan in refrigerator
Sem Sem nanopartnanopartíículacula Com Com nanopartnanopartíículacula
Após 3 semanas em refrigerador
Sem Sem nanopartnanopartíículacula Com Com nanopartnanopartíículacula
Após 3 semanas em refrigerador
Products have a long lasting life span in the market 2
Embrapa (bio-edible films): tocover macadamia nuts
PrimoMaxx (grassgrowing modifier): reduces cut circles