GSMP Franchise Working Session July 18, 2007. Introduction To Famous Dutch Things.
-
Upload
brooke-fuller -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of GSMP Franchise Working Session July 18, 2007. Introduction To Famous Dutch Things.
GSMP Franchise Working Session
July 18, 2007
Introduction To Famous Dutch Things
©2005 GS13GSMP: The Global Collaborative Forum
Famous Dutch Animals
©2005 GS14GSMP: The Global Collaborative Forum
Famous Dutch Architecture…
…(not famous dutch visitor)
©2005 GS15GSMP: The Global Collaborative Forum
Famous Dutch Soccer Player
©2005 GS16GSMP: The Global Collaborative Forum
Famous Dutch Automotive Industry
©2005 GS17GSMP: The Global Collaborative Forum
Famous Dutch Culinary Expert
©2005 GS18GSMP: The Global Collaborative Forum
Goal
• To enhance the GSMP Franchise Process and deliver “phase 2” documentation
• To incorporate additional feedback from the MO’s in the pilot
©2005 GS19GSMP: The Global Collaborative Forum
Agenda
• 1. Status report from existing Franchises. • This will be to provide feedback to the team on what's going on in your area, how the model is
working, etc.
• 2. Voting/Validation model. • Complete this model from the discussion in Budapest.
• 3. Moving from a "compiled" to an "ad hoc" Global Agenda environment. • It appeared from the last global agenda call and the feedback from the last survey, that we may be
having trouble synchronizing our meeting schedules. This has lead to feedback coming too late with development. A proposal is to work in a more extemporaneous environment. This will be the topic of discussion.
• 4. Management and Oversight of MO Franchises. • This topic will touch on the subject of overseeing administration of the Franchises. As we
discussed on the phone, this is a sensitive subject which I believe needs a creative solution.
• 5. Name Change: • As we move ahead, we need to begin thinking about the long term "go to market" name for the
Franchise process.
• 6. Other. • If you have any additional topics, feel free to let me know.
©2005 GS110GSMP: The Global Collaborative Forum
Status report from existing Franchises
• “We’re on the right track”• Confusion of use of Franchise for Simple vs.
Complex• Resource loads beginning to be known• Need for subject matter expertise identified• Still in a formative state• “When its going right, why vote?”
©2005 GS111GSMP: The Global Collaborative Forum
Status report from existing Franchises, cont
• Selectivity being used• Time• Relevance when divided by Business Unit• “Product” is not ready for prime time• Are we getting the right questions in a timely
manner from the development process?• Are we missing other opportunities?• Are we focusing on communicating the nature of
the problem we’re solving• Is the term “global agenda” confusing?
©2005 GS112GSMP: The Global Collaborative Forum
What does the new GSMP process look like, for Complex CR’s?
StatementOf
Business Need
Require-ments &
Gathering Analysis
BusinessSolutionDesign
TechnicalSolutionDesign
Pilot Posting
4 5 62 31
BRG Sponsored Work Groups
Sign UpDraft, Review,
and MotionCore
eBallotDraft, Review,
and MotionDraft, Review,
and MotionDraft, Review,
and Motion
StatementOf
Business Need
Require-ments &
Gathering Analysis
BusinessSolutionDesign
TechnicalSolutionDesign
Pilot Posting
4 5 62 31
GSMP Global BRGs and Work Groups
Sign UpDraft, Review,
and MotionPost to
websiteDraft, Review,
and MotionCore eballot
Pilot - update standard
MO Franchise Work GroupsGSMP MO Franchises
This feedback must occur
before eballot, during or around
TSD motion.Action: adjust
picture and documentation
accordingly
©2005 GS113GSMP: The Global Collaborative Forum
“No” Vote (Objections) Scenarios
Divergence(No Votes)
< 5 votes in all MO’s;
< 33% across all MO’s
FM’s add comments to public review
≥ 33% across all MO’s
FMO comment period;Mandatory 2nd motion
< 33% across all MO’s;
≥ 5 votes in any single MO’s
FMO comment period;Optional 2nd motion
Scenario 1
Scenario 2
©2005 GS114GSMP: The Global Collaborative Forum
Voting/Validation model
• Scenario 1: “Global” divergence• Means broad or uniform disagreement w the core
across the local communities
• Over 33% of aggregate of Franchise members say no.
• Remedy:
• Require a dialogue session with the BRG or work group…MO reps would communicate the rationale for “non-acceptance”
• Require a second eballot or motion
©2005 GS115GSMP: The Global Collaborative Forum
Voting/Validation model, cont
• Scenario 2: “Local” divergence• Overall, less than 33% of Franchise members
say no
• But one or more MO communities disagreeing with the core (No>33% at local level)
• Require a session with the BRG or WG for comment by the MO rep
• No required additional eballot
©2005 GS116GSMP: The Global Collaborative Forum
Calculation of “NO”
• Same as the core…33% say no, then the formal comment activity occurs
• Includes a minimum of 5 trading partners
• Note: • Less than 33%, “no” users can add comments
directly or join the core
©2005 GS117GSMP: The Global Collaborative Forum
Other points:
• Notes:• This process must align with core during the
public review/comment and motion to progress prior to pilot and eballot• (need to adjust picture)
• GA must be distributed prior to or during public review
• Action: need to analyse time allowance
©2005 GS118GSMP: The Global Collaborative Forum
Scenario One Comments
• Time impact concern (2 weeks too short)• Language concern (work needs to be
translated)• We need to balance speed against
consensus
• Time Problem:• Cycle time for a review
• Frequency of the global agenda
©2005 GS119GSMP: The Global Collaborative Forum
Notes On Common Global Agenda Issuance and Usage
• Need to move forward in separating truly simple from those now called simple but their not
• 30 day review• Formal Franchise outreach at the end of the
BRAD• Review current BRAD design for “business
worthy” language of key requirements• Fix dates for GA calls in advance (12
months), including feedback dates
©2005 GS120GSMP: The Global Collaborative Forum
Purpose of Feedback
• To understand if the requirements are complete• Are the requirements complete?
• To know if the world considers the solution effective• Is the solution valid, correct and complete?
• Technically sound
• Address the need
• To know if the world will migrate to the new standard• Will you implement the solution and when?
©2005 GS121GSMP: The Global Collaborative Forum
Improving Requirements Gathering Feedback
• Need to communicate the problem and the requirements clearly
• Are the requirements complete?
• Add “Business Function/Purpose” information from the CR to the GA
• Ensure the problem is stated in business terms
©2005 GS122GSMP: The Global Collaborative Forum
Management and Oversight of MO Franchises
• Issue• Is the local MO prepared to administer a
Franchise?
• Do they have an engaged community?
• Do they know the resource requirements and are they prepared to devote the resources?
• Are they aware of the intent of the program?
• Do they agree to the required norms?
©2005 GS123GSMP: The Global Collaborative Forum
Tools
• Check list of success criteria and readiness report
• Documentation/Launch kit• Franchise application and approval process• MO Franchise Oversight Team• “MO buddy system”
©2005 GS124GSMP: The Global Collaborative Forum
Criteria
• Must be directly involved in GSMP• Must have strong GSMP process knowledge• Must have GS1 system & business process subject
matter expertise• Must have ability to translate from English• Must have a community of users that the MO is
currently engaged with• Must follow a philosophy of collaboration (applies to
MO facilitator and member)• Must devote sufficient resource time to execute the
process…1 FTE (including GSMP engagement)
©2005 GS125GSMP: The Global Collaborative Forum
Franchise Oversight by Process Group
• Assure “on-boarding” tools and support are adequate and provided
• Oversees the Execution of the application process• An application template will be developed• Applications will be submitted to the Process
Group
• Review concerns and appeals, submit recommendations on actions to BCS
©2005 GS126GSMP: The Global Collaborative Forum
Name Change
• GSMP Precincts• GSMP Regional• GSMP Regional Involvement Process• GSMP Local User Connection• Global User Connection• RSMP – Regional Standards Management Process• Regional User Management Process• Regional Standards Validation Process• Regional Standards Development• GSMP-NET• GSMP Local User Communities• GSMP Outreach Process• GSMP Satellites• GSMP Satellite Network• Global Community Network• Global Standards Network• Extended GSMP• GSMP Extended Engagement Committees/Communities• GSMP MO Deployment• GSMP MO Network• GSMP Network• GSMP Regional Assessment – Development – Action – Response (RADAR)
©2005 GS127GSMP: The Global Collaborative Forum
Next Steps
1. The new voting/validation model will be written up and communicated to the process group for approval
2. The proposal for extension of all public review periods to 30 days will be proposed also to the Process Group
3. There will be a review of the BRAD to analyse the document for improved communication of business rationale (for communication to the Franchises)
4. The Oversight process will be proposed to the Process Group (inclusive of application process)
5. We will continue to search for a new name
©2005 GS128GSMP: The Global Collaborative Forum
Thank You