Chandra_Synthesis and Electronic Transport in Single Walled Carbon Nanotubes
Growth of single-walled carbon nanotubes on porous silicon
Transcript of Growth of single-walled carbon nanotubes on porous silicon
www.elsevier.com/locate/apsusc
Applied Surface Science 252 (2006) 7347–7351
Short communication
Growth of single-walled carbon
nanotubes on porous silicon
Rui Wang, Huaming Xu, Liqiu Guo, Ji Liang *
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Received 31 May 2005; accepted 27 August 2005
Available online 28 September 2005
Abstract
Porous silicon is an important and versatile material in the semiconductor industry, and can be achieved by electrochemically
etching silicon wafers. Employing porous silicon as substrates, this article presents a new approach to grow single-walled carbon
nanotubes on wafers for device applications. Free from support materials, this method is a clean one. At the same time it is
feasible and robust, as porous silicon is remarkably superior to polished surface in facilitating the nucleation of catalyst. The
superiority of porous silicon over polished surface is attributed to their different dewetting manners.
# 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Single-walled carbon nanotubes; Porous silicon; Synthesis; Silicon wafers; Dewetting
1. Introduction
Chemical vapor deposition (CVD) of single-
walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) on wafers is a
promising approach to integrate nanotubes into
electronic devices and structural systems. In many
instances, the key to success lies in the nano-scale
size of catalyst particles [1]. Thus it is essential to
develop novel methods to form catalyst nanopar-
itcles on substrates and prevent them from migrating
and sintering at elevated temperature. Various
approaches have so far been presented, classified
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +86 010 62782413.
E-mail address: [email protected] (J. Liang).
0169-4332/$ – see front matter # 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved
doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2005.08.067
into dry methods and wet methods. In the case of
dry methods, very thin film of catalyst is sputtered
or deposited onto substrates [2]. And in the case of
wet methods, catalyst precursors are prepared in the
form of solution. Support materials such as Al2O3
are employed in many wet methods [3]. They make
these methods feasible and reliable, but possibly
lead to contamination. In order to avoid contamina-
tion from support materials, investigators have taken
efforts to search for new wet methods recently. For
example, laborious measures are taken to achieve
catalyst particles of the same size in solvents before
delivery [4]. In comparison, directly reducing the
thickness of the liquid films covered on wafers
seems to be a simpler one [5]. However, in demand
.
R. Wang et al. / Applied Surface Science 252 (2006) 7347–73517348
of smooth surface, this method is difficult to carry
out in practical device manufacture.
Here we focus on the modification of substrates and
present a new wet method to grow SWNTs on wafers
without support materials. In this method, Si wafers
are electrochemically etched before impregnation in
the solution of catalyst precursors, and porous silicon
(PS) rather than polished surface is employed as
substrates. Porous silicon is compatible with silicon
technology. As an important and versatile material in
the semiconductor industry, it has been intensely
investigated since 1990 [6]. With porous silicon as
substrates, the approach described here is as robust as
those using support materials, and can be directly
applied to wafers after patterning.
Fig. 1. Schematic process flow for the synthesis of SWNTs on
porous silicon.
2. Experiments
Porous silicon samples were prepared by electro-
chemical etching of n+ type Si(1 0 0) wafers
(resistivity 0.001–0.005 V cm). Etching was carried
out without illumination for 15 min. The electrolyte
contained one portion of hydrogen fluoride (50%
aqueous solution), one portion of ethanol and two
portions of water. The anodization current density was
kept constant at 30 mA/cm2. The resulting substrates
were then annealed in air at 300 8C overnight to
protect their porous structure from collapsing later in
the high-temperature CVD process.
As-grown porous silicon substrates were impreg-
nated in the ethanol or aqueous solution of Fe(NO3)3
for a few minutes. Excess solution was removed and
the substrates were dried in ambient air. Subsequently,
the samples were placed in a quartz boat and inserted
into the center of 1 in. tube reactor housed in a furnace.
The furnace was heated to 900 8C in flowing Ar. The
reaction began as Ar was replaced by CH4 (flow rate
1000 sccm). After 15 min, the flow was switched to Ar
and the furnace was cooled to room temperature. The
whole process is sketched out in Fig. 1.
The results were characterized with SEM and
TEM. Electron-transparent samples for TEM were
prepared by direct cleavage from the porous wafer
surface [7]. In details, a sharp scalpel blade was
drawn carefully across the surface, causing the
porous layer to fracture and yield fragments of many
sizes. These fragments were collected and sonicated
in ethanol. A few drops of ethanol containing
sufficient material were dropped onto specimen grids
for TEM analysis.
3. Result and discussion
The typical images of porous silicon are shown in
Fig. 2. The cross section (Fig. 2a) indicates that porous
silicon layers have the dendrite morphology for
heavily doped n wafers. According to the plan view
(Fig. 2b), micropores are exposed on wafer surface.
The diameter of pores depends on etching parameters
such as electrolyte composition, dopant concentration
and anodization current density. Under the condition
described above, most pores have the diameter of
�10 nm. In our experiments, the pore diameter was
varied within a wide range by controlling etching
parameters. However, the variation in the pore size has
been found to have little effect on the growth of
SWNTs. The cause will be discussed in the latter
paragraph.
R. Wang et al. / Applied Surface Science 252 (2006) 7347–7351 7349
Fig. 2. TEM micrographs of porous silicon. (a) Cross section. (b)
Plan view.Fig. 3. SWNTs attached to the fragments of porous silicon.
Fig. 4. The SEM micrograph of SWNTs grown on porous silicon
layers.
After the CVD process, wafers with CNTs were
carefully observed under SEM and TEM. TEM
analysis has proved almost all nanotubes to be
single-walled. Typical images are given in Fig. 3. In
these figures, SWNTs extend from the surface of
porous silicon. SWNTs are straight and have a good
quality. Only a little amorphous carbon sticks to them.
The SEM images present the distribution of SWNTs
on porous silicon layers, as shown in Fig. 4. The
Fe(NO3)3 concentration corresponding to this figure is
15 mg/ml. Here the white lines are SWNTs or thin
SWNT bundles, and the bright dots represent catalyst
nanoparticles. A gap was purposely created to show
nanotubes more clearly. Dark shadow is artificial and
caused by magnetism of catalyst. SWNTs go through
catalyst particles, close to the surface. Most SWNTs
are several micrometers in length. In contrast to the
web-like morphology previously reported, as-grown
SWNTs (or bundles) have free ends and are isolated
with one another. All these features are beneficial to
the application of SWNT devices.
Investigation into the dominant factors indicates
that this approach is a reliable one. Various growth
R. Wang et al. / Applied Surface Science 252 (2006) 7347–73517350
conditions adopted in the traditional approaches,
for example CH4 1080 sccm/H2 125 sccm/900 8Cor C2H4 10 sccm/Ar 600 sccm/H2 400 sccm/750 8C[8,9], are applicable to this method. The remarkably
different concentration of Fe(NO3)3 solution will
lead to the growth of SWNTs. Moreover, the
morphology is similar except that the density of
SWNTs is varied from the Fe(NO3)3 concentration.
A wide range from 150 mg/ml to 25 mg/ml has been
tested to prove it. Compared with this, as polished
wafers are directly used as substrates, a very low
concentration of catalyst solution is required [10].
Besides ferric salts, other catalyst systems such as
Fe/Mo and Co/Mo are being tried for this approach,
and feasibility is expected.
In the following paragraphs, the function that
porous silicon layers perform during the formation
of catalyst nanoparticles will be discussed. To
understand it, wafers with catalyst were observed in
a higher magnification under SEM. The resulting
figures (such as Fig. 5) indicate that only a few
catalyst nanoparticles are embedded in pores, and
the others are dispersed on surface. That is to say, in
this approach porous silicon layers function as
support materials rather than templates, which is
similar to Al2O3 or MgO in the mass-production of
SWNTs. Thus catalyst nanoparticles are not
identical to the pores in dimension. This point
would explain why the pore diameter of porous
silicon layers has little effect on the growth of
SWNTs.
Fig. 5. Catalyst nanoparticles dispersed on porous silicon.
As support materials, porous silicon is superior to
polished surface because of different dewetting
manners. In the case of polished wafers, liquid film
will shrink across the whole surface, probably leading
to residual solution and large-size particles. Thus in
order to form catalyst nanoparticles with the uniform
distribution on silicon wafers, perfect surface is
required and additional measures should be taken.
In contrast, in the case of porous silicon, the manner of
dewetting is from surface to interior. As wafers are
dried, liquid film on surface would shrink into the
nearby pores. That means dewetting is restricted
within a very small area. This dewetting manner
inhibits the growth of catalyst particles, so it is
favorable to the formation of nanoparticles.
4. Conclusion
In conclusion, we present a new wet method to
grow separated SWNTs on wafers for device
applications. In this method, silicon wafers are
electrochemically etched and the resulting porous
silicon layers are employed as substrates to grow
SWNTs. Porous silicon is a developed material in
semiconductor industry and compatible with prac-
tical silicon technology. Compared with polished
surface, porous silicon layers are more beneficial to
the formation of catalyst nanoparticles with the
uniform distribution. Different dewetting manners
would be responsible for it. With porous silicon as
substrates, the method described here is simple and
robust, and can be directly applied to wafers after
patterning.
References
[1] A. Gorbunov, O. Jost, W. Pompe, A. Graff, Appl. Surf. Sci. 197
(2002) 563.
[2] Lance Delzeit, Bin Chen, Alan Cassell, Ramsey Stevens,
Cattien Nguyen, M. Meyyappan, Chem. Phys. Lett. 348
(2001) 368.
[3] Jing Kong, Hyongsok T. Soh, Alan M. Cassell, Calvin F.
Quate, Hongjie Dai, Nature (London) 395 (1998) 878.
[4] Yiming Li, Woong Kim, Yuegang Zhang, Marco Rolandi,
Dunwei Wang, Hongjie Dai, J. Phys. Chem. B 105 (2001)
11424.
[5] Yoichi Murakami, Yuhei Miyauchi, Shohei Chiashi, Shigeo
Maruyama, Chem. Phys. Lett. 377 (2003) 49.
R. Wang et al. / Applied Surface Science 252 (2006) 7347–7351 7351
[6] A.G. Gullis, L.T. Canham, P.D.J. Calcott, J. Appl. Phys. 82
(1997) 909.
[7] A.G. Gullis, L.T. Canham, Nature (London) 353 (1991) 335.
[8] Nathan R. Franklin, Yiming Li, Robert J. Chen, Ali Javey,
Hongjie Dai, Appl. Phys. Lett. 79 (2001) 4571.
[9] Chin Li Cheung, Andrea Kurtz, Hongkun Park, Charles M.
Lieber, J. Phys. Chem. B 106 (2002) 2429.
[10] Jason H. Hafner, Chin Li Cheung, Tjerk H. Oosterkamp,
Charles M. Lieber, J. Phys. Chem. B 105 (2001)
743.